Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2721_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
20. Middleton P, Kelly AM, Brown J, et al. Agreement between arterial and central venous values for pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and lactate. Emerg Med J, 2006. 23(8): 622–624.
21. Hillman K. Fluid resuscitation in diabetic emergencies–a reappraisal. Intensive Care Med, 1987. 13(1): 4–8.
22. Molitch ME, Rodman E, Hirsch CA, et al. Spurious serum creatinine elevations in ketoacidosis. Ann Intern Med,
1980. 93(2): 280–281.
23. Kitabchi AE, Murphy MB, Spencer J, et al. Is a priming dose of insulin necessary in a low-dose insulin protocol for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis? Diabetes Care,
2008. 31(11): 2081–2085.
24. Luzi L, Barrett EJ, Groop LC, et al. Metabolic effects of low­dose insulin therapy on glucose metabolism in diabetic ketoacidosis. Diabetes, 1988. 37 (11): 1470–1477.
25. Brown PM, Tompkins CV, Juul S, et al. Mechanism of action of insulin in diabetic patients: a dose-related effect on glucose production and utilisation.Br Med J, 1978. 1(6122): 1239–1242.
26. Umpierrez GE, Cuervo R, Karabell A, et al. Treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis with subcutaneous insulin aspart. Diabetes Care, 2004. 27(8): 1873–1878.
27. Hillier TA, Abbott RD, Barrett EJ. Hyponatremia: evaluating the correction factor for hyperglycemia. Am J Med,
1999. 106(4): 399–403.
28. Narins RG, Cohen JJ. Bicarbonate therapy for organic acidosis: the case for its continued use. Ann Intern Med, 1987. 106(4): 615–618.
29. Okuda Y, Adrogue HJ, Field JB, et al. Counterproductive effects of sodium bicarbonate in diabetic ketoacidosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1996. 81(1): 314–320.
30. Wolfsdorf J, Glaser N, Sperling MA. Diabetic ketoacidosis in infants, children, and adolescents: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 2006. 29(5): 1150–1159.
31. Medical Managment of Type I Diabetes. American Diabetes Association, 2004. Alexandria, VA.
32. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2009. 32(1): 193–203.
33. Tokarski GF, Kahler JK. Diabetic ketoacidosis in the emergency department and clinical decision unit. Ann Emerg Med, 1998. 32(3): S15.
Hyperglycemia
043
21:05:56
Subpart IVE
Chapter
40
Clinical – Metabolic, Endocrine
Hypoglycemia
Pawan Suri, MD Taruna Aurora, MD
Introduction
Severe hypoglycemia is defined as an episode that is undetected by the patient or is detected so late that intervention by someone else is required to inject glucagon or take the patient to the hospital to receive intravenous (IV) glucose.
1
Varying degrees of hypoglycemia are seen in both type I and type II diabetics. Type I diabetic patients on intensive insulin therapy have a greater than threefold increased risk of severe hypoglycemia.
2
Less commonly, severe hypoglycemia may also affect patients with type II diabetes who take either oral antidiabetic medications or insulin. In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), type I diabetics had a 65% inci­dence of severe hypoglycemia when followed over
6.5 years.
2
In contrast, the cumulative incidence of hypoglycemia in type II diabetics who were followed over a period of 6 years was 3.3% in patients taking sulfonylureas and 11.2% in patients taking insulin.
3
Thus, hypoglycemia becomes a progressively more frequent clinical problem in type II diabetics as they approach the insulin deficient end of the disease spectrum.
Risk factors for hypoglycemia include patients over age 65, those taking multiple medications and those who are frequently hospitalized.
4,5
. Commonly, patients have inadvertently taken excessive or ill-timed dose of their insulin or oral hypoglycemic agent. Decrease in exogenous glu­cose delivery – as seen with missed meals, delayed gastric emptying or an overnight state – is another frequent cause of hypoglycemic episodes. Long­acting agents such as chlorpropamide and glybur­ide are more likely to cause hypoglycemia.
4,6
Renal insufficiency is associated with a fourfold increased risk for hypoglycemia in patients taking sulfonylureas. Interaction of gatifloxacin with sul­fonylureas can also cause hypoglycemia.
7
This is unique to gatifloxacin and not a quinolone class effect. ACE inhibitors increase insulin sensitivity
and glucose disposal, incr easing the risk of hypo­glycemia. Nonselective ß-blockers can impair early warning symptoms and can lead to severe hypoglycemia.
8,9
One of the best predictors for developing severe hypoglycemia is a previous epi­sode of severe hypoglycemia. The risk is also increased in patients with high initial HbA1c levels that decreased quickly after intensive insu­lin therapy was begun. Other minor risk factors include male sex, higher insulin doses and adolescents.
Pathophysiology
In normal subjects the extrac ellular supply of glucose is carefully regulated by insulin and glu­cagon.
5
Insulin acts to restore normoglycemia in three ways: (a) It decreases hepatic glucose pro­duction by inhibiting both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, (b) Increased glucose uptake by skeletal muscle and adipose tissue by translocat­ing glucos e transporters from an intracellular pool to the cell surface, and (c) It reduces the delivery of gluconeogenetic precursors alanine and glycerol to the liver via its antiproteolytic and antilipolytic actions. Insulin also inhibits glu­cagon secretion by direct inhibition of the gluca­gon gene in the pancreatic alpha cells,
10
which
further diminishes hepatic glucose production.
The ability to suppress insulin release is an important component of the normal response to hypoglycemia. Another defense against hypogly­cemia is the increased release of counter-regulatory hormones, which raise plasma glucose concentra­tion by stimulating glucose production and by antagonizing insulin induced increase in glucose utilization. In diabetics, since insulin is supplied exogenously and cannot be suppressed, the release of conterregulatory hormones becomes the pri­mary defense against hypoglycemia.
These hormones are, in order of importance, glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth
044
21:05:54
hormone.
5,11
Glucagon acts only on the liver, increasing glucose production by stimulating both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis from amino acids, glycerol, and pyruvate. Epinephrine, acting via ß-adrenergic receptors has similar hep­atic effects. It also increases the delivery of gluco­neogenic substrates from the periphery, inhibits glucose utilization and via alpha-2 receptors inhibits insulin secretion. In addition, epineph­rine induces early warning symptoms of hypogly­cemia including anxiety and sweating. If the hypoglycemia is severe and persists for several hours, there is increased secretion of cortisol and growth hormone, which limit glucose utilization and enhance hepatic glucose production. It is important to understand that the actions of insu­lin and glucagon are interdependent. In the pan­creatic islets of Langerhans, the insulin producing ß-cells form the core, surrounded by glucagon producing alpha cells. Arterial blood enters the core of each islet, delivering substrates and information first to the beta cells and then to alpha and delta cells.
12
The alpha cells rely heavily on the presence of functioning beta cells in order to function,
13
a situation that is disturbed
in diabetes.
Glycemic thresholds in normal subjects
– 80 mg/dl – Insulin secretion falls to very
low levels
– 65–70 mg/dl – Release of glucagon and
epinephrine, early protective response: sweating, anxiety, palpitations and tremors
< 60 mg/dl – Early cognitive dysfunction and
release of cortisol and growth hormone
4550 mg/dl Letha rgy and obtundation< 30 mg/dl Coma and convulsions
Response to Hypoglycemia in Diabetic Patients
The protective response to hypoglycemia is impaired in many diabetic patients.
14
This is par­ticularly true when hypoglycemia is induced either directly from exogenous insulin injection or indirectly from sulfonylurea stimulation. In these patients insulin release cannot be turned off and therefore glucose utilization and inhib­ition of hepatic glucose production continues. Further, both glucagon and epinephrine response
to hypoglycemia are impaired in many diabetic patients. Diabetic patients who are well controlled (HbA1c levels < 8%) may have few warning symptoms when their plasma glucose concentra­tion falls below 60 mg/dl. The absence of epineph­rine induced early warning symptoms can often lead to dangerously low blood glucose levels. The concept of hypoglycemia associated auto­nomic failure (HAAF) in type I diabetes mellitus (DM),
15–17
posits that recent antecedent hypogly­cemia causes both defective glucose counter­regulation and hypoglycemia unawareness, setting up a vicious cycle. Hypoglycemic episodes may lead to up regulation of glucose transport in the brain resulting in the maintenance of glucose uptake and therefore the prevention of warning symptoms of hypoglycemia. The compensatory increase in cortisol production during the first hypoglycemia episode may also play a critical role in minimizing the protective hormonal response during a subsequent episode.
18,19
As few as 2–3 weeks of scrupulous avoidance of hypoglycemia reverses hypoglycemia unawareness and improves the reduced epinephrine component of defective glucose counter regulation.
Hypoglycemia is less common in type II DM because deficits in glucagon and epinephrine are much less prominent
20
and strict glycemic con-
trol is much more difficult to achieve.
21
How­ever, when hypoglycemia does occur in older patients, the glucose threshold for the onset of cognitive dysfunction may overlap with the onset of symptoms, thus limiting the time to initiate self treatment and increasing the risk of severe neurological events.
22
Patient Selection
Hypoglycemic patients on long-acting insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents who fail to respond to oral or parenteral glucose or show recurrence of hypoglycemia in the emergency department (ED) are often hospitalized for further management. While most of these patients can be successfully managed in an ED observation unit (ED OU), some may require inpatient admission. These include patients with intentional insulin or oral antidiabetic medication overdose, patients with acute or chronic renal or hepatic insufficiency, persistent mental status changes despite glucose administration or those with an acute precipitating illness like sepsis, chronic heart failure, and others.
Hypoglycemia
044
21:05:54
Observation Unit Management
A thorough history is essential in determining the cause of hypoglycemia. The amount, timing and reason for any ingestion, what drug was taken, and coingestants including other diabetic medica­tions must be noted. Laboratory tests should include a basic metabolic panel and renal function with further testing as deemed necessary.
Hypoglycemia will respond rapidly to IV Dex­trose (D-glucose) 0.5–1 gm/kg available in 50 ml ampoules containing 25 g glucose in a 50% solu­tion (D50). If thiamine deficiency from alcohol­ism or other forms of malnutrition is suspected, parenteral thiamine, 100 mg IV is given in con­junction with glucose.
Glucagon 5 mg, given IM raises serum glucose levels slightly and is often used in pre-hospital setting as a temporizing measure
23
when IV access has not been established. The efficacy of glucagon is dependent upon hepatic glyco gen stores, which may be depleted in the setting of prolonged hypoglycemia.
24
Once the initial hypo­glycemia is corrected, blood glucose should be measured twice more at 30-minute intervals and if patient remains euglycemic, serum glucose can be checked every 4–6 hours thereafter. If the patients respond to initial therapy with IV glucose based on clinical symptoms and serum glucose of more than 60 mg/dl, they should be fed a calorie rich meal.
If the hypoglycemia is due to an oral hypogly­cemic medication, then holding the medication, feeding calorie rich meal and observation will suffice for the majority of patients. The role of octreotide in the observation setting is less clear. If the patient develops a second episode of hypo­glycemia, the authors have on occasion safely administered octreotide, which is a somatostatin analog that inhibits insulin release from pancre­atic beta islet cells.
25
The drug is rapidly and completely absorbed when given subcutaneously, reaching 100% bioavailability within 30 min­utes.
26
In adults, the dose of octreotide is 50–150
mcg administered by IM or SQ injection every
6 hours. It may also be given as an IV bolus over several minutes or by continuous infusion.
When discharging a diabetic patient with hypoglycemia from the OU, consider consulting with the patients primary care provider or endo­crinologist to determine the need for modification to the current antidiabetic regimen. Since the patient is at risk for recurrence of severe hypogly­cemia following the initial episode, it is important to avoid tight blood sugar control for 1–2 subse­quent weeks. Consider insulin regimens that min­imize the risk of hypoglycemia.
15
In a split mixed insulin regimen, moving the dose of NPH insulin to bedtime has been reported to decrease the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Another alternative is the use of basal-bolus insulin regi­men that involves the use of a long-acting basal insulin analog once a day with rapid acting insu­lin analog with meals.
Observation Unit Outcome
Goh et al. performed a prospective observational study of consecutive patients with diabetes admit­ted to the ED OU for severe hypoglycemia. Out of 203 patients admitted, 170 were discharg ed and 33 transferred to an inpatient team for a longer period of treatment. The median length of stay for discharged patients was 23 hours. Of the 170 patients discharged, 151 were contacted at 7 and 28 days after discharge. Six patients had symptoms of recurrent hypoglycemia of which two returned to the ED and were admitted. This study showed that selected patients with hypogly­cemia and be effectively and safely treated in an observation unit.
27
In our experience, carefully selected patients are ideally suited to observation management and can be safely discharged from an ED OU. The controlled environment of the ED OU also provides an excellent opportunity to further educate the patients on their disease pro­cess as well as tips to avoid future hypoglycemic episodes. There could be potential cost saving for the hospital if the ED OU can demonstrate earlier disposition as opposed to inpatient admission.
References
1. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetic Association (A.D.A.), Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in
diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care, 2005. 28(5): 1245–1249.
2. Lasker RD. The diabetes control and complications trial. Implications for policy and practice. N Engl J Med, 1993. 329(14): 1035–1036.
Pawan Suri and Taruna Aurora
044
21:05:54
3. U.K. prospective diabetes study
16. Overview of 6 years
therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes, 1995. 44(11): 1249–1258.
4. Krentz AJ, Ferner RE, Bailey CJ. Comparative tolerability profiles of oral antidiabetic agents. Drug Saf, 1994. 11(4): 223–241.
5. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, et al. Incidence and risk factors for serious hypoglycemia in older persons using insulin or sulfonylureas. Arch Intern Med, 1997. 157(15): 1681–1686.
6. Stahl M, Berger W. Higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia leading to hospital admission in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with long-acting versus short-acting sulphonylureas. Diabet Med,
1999. 16(7): 586–590.
7. Menzies DJ, Dorsainvil PA, Cunha BA, et al. Severe and persistent hypoglycemia due to gatifloxacin interaction with oral hypoglycemic agents. Am J Med, 2002. 113(3): 232–234.
8. ter Braak EW, Appleman AM, van de Laak M, et al. Clinical characteristics of type 1 diabetic patients with and without severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care, 2000. 23(10): 1467–1471.
9. Pedersen-Bjergaard U,Reubsaet JL, Nielsen SL, et al. Psychoactive drugs, alcohol, and severe hypoglycemia in insulin-treated diabetes: analysis of 141 cases. Am J Med, 2005. 118(3): 307–310.
10. Gerich JE. Oral hypoglycemic agents. N Engl J Med, 1989. 321(18): 1231–1245.
11. Eliasson L, Renstrom E, Ammala C, et al. PKC­dependent stimulation of exocytosis by sulfonylureas in
pancreatic beta cells. Science,
1996. 271(5250): 813–815.
12. Spiller HA, Management of sulfonylurea ingestions. Pediatr Emerg Care, 1999. 15(3): 227–230.
13. Dizon AM, Kowalyk S, Hoogwerf BJ. Neuroglycopenic and other symptoms in patients with insulinomas. Am J Med, 1999. 106(3): 307–310.
14. Hepburn DA, Deary IJ, Frier BM, et al. Symptoms of acute insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans with and without IDDM. Factor-analysis approach. Diabetes Care, 1991. 14(11): 949–957.
15. Cryer PE. Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II diabetes. Diabetologia,
2002. 45(7): 937–948.
16. Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2003. 26(6): 1902–1912.
17. Dagogo-Jack SE, Craft S, Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in insulin­dependent diabetes mellitus. Recent antecedent hypoglycemia reduces autonomic responses to, symptoms of, and defense against subsequent hypoglycemia. J Clin Invest,
1993. 91(3): 819–828.
18. Davis SN, Shavers C, Davis B, et al. Prevention of an increase in plasma cortisol during hypoglycemia preserves subsequent counterregulatory responses. J Clin Invest, 1997. 100(2): 429–438.
19. Davis SN, Shavers C, Costa F, et al. Role of cortisol in the pathogenesis of deficient counterregulation after antecedent hypoglycemia in normal humans. J Clin Invest,
1996. 98(3): 680–691.
20. MacLeod KM, Hepburn DA, Frier BM. Frequency and
morbidity of severe hypoglycaemia in insulin­treated diabetic patients. Diabet Med, 1993. 10(3): 238–245.
21. Abraira C, Colwell JA J, Nuttall FQ, et al., Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1995. 18(8): 1113–1123.
22. Saudek CD, Duckworth WC, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Implantable insulin pump vs multiple-dose insulin for non­insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. Department of Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group. JAMA,
1996. 276(16): 1322–1327.
23. Schwartz NS, Clutter WE, Shah SD, et al. Glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems are higher than the threshold for symptoms. J Clin Invest, 1987. 79(3): 777–781.
24. Brelje TC, Scharp DW, Sorenson RL. Three­dimensional imaging of intact isolated islets of Langerhans with confocal microscopy. Diabetes, 1989. 38(6): 808–814.
25. Weir GC, Bonner-Weir S. Islets of Langerhans: the puzzle of intraislet interactions and their relevance to diabetes. J Clin Invest, 1990. 85(4): 983–987.
26. White NH, Skor DA, Cryer PE, et al. Identification of type I diabetic patients at increased risk for hypoglycemia during intensive therapy. N Engl J Med, 1983. 308(9): 485–491.
27. Goh HK, Chew DE, Miranda IG, et al. 24-Hour observational ward management of diabetic patients presenting with hypoglycaemia: a prospective observational study. Emerg Med J, 2009. 26(10): 719–723.
Hypoglycemia
044
21:05:54
Subpart IVE
Chapter
41
Clinical – Metabolic, Endocrine
Electrolyte Abnormalities
Kimberly A. Ressler, MD, MSN Jonathan Glauser, MD, FACEP
Introduction
Patients with electrolyte abnormalities may be appropriate for the observation unit (OU) depending on the severity of the disturbance, the patients comorbidities, and the suspected eti­ology of the imbalance. Optimal management of specific electrolyte problems must take into account acid-base status, patient-volume status, underlying disorders, and measurements of other electrolytes. Especially as regards the intracellular cations: potassium and magnesium, serum levels may not be an accurate indicator of total body stores. Patients with the potential for requiring lifesaving interventions or prolonged treatments are better suited for admission to higher levels of care.
Potassium
Potassium is responsible for the resting mem­brane potential for electrical impulses and is crit­ical in the bodys acid-base homeostasis. Buffering an acute acidosis or alkalosis entails the exchange of K
+
and H+across the cell membrane. A general rule is that for a change of 0.1 pH unit there is an inverse change of 0.5 mEq/L in the serum K
+.1
Hypokalemic patients who are acidotic may require vigorous repletion.
Hypokalemia
Hypokalemia, a serum level < 3.5 mmol/L, most frequently follows potassium (K
+
) losses or intra­cellular shifts. Diureti c therapy, both loop and thiazide, is the commonest cause. The most fre­quently seen extra-renal cause of hypokalemia is severe or chronic diarrhea from both volume depletion and direct K
+
losses in the stool.2In
the presence of metabolic alkalosis, K
+
ions shift into the cells in exchange for hydrogen ions to maintain normal pH of the extracellular fluid. Respiratory acid-base abnormalities do not have
this same effect on potassium.
3
Low serum mag­nesium may contribute to hypokalemia through renal wasting. Typically patients have no symp­toms with mild hypokalemia at serum levels of
3.0–3.5 mmol/L, but patients with underlying heart disease have an increased risk of dysrhyth­mia even within this range.
4
Patients appropriate for the OU include those
with serum K
+
> 2.0, without severe symptoms
such as ileus, rhabdomyolysis, respiratory muscle weakness, or ascending paralysis, not on digitalis and without ventricular dysrthymias. Typically, these will be patients taking a thiazide or loop diuretic, or have an acute GI fluid loss. Classic EKG changes of hypokalemia with U waves, T wave flattening, and ST segment changes should not preclude an OU stay. ECG monitoring for ventricular dysrhythmia is required during intra­venous (IV) potassium replacement.
5
Treatment
For mild and asymptomatic hypokalemia, oral replacement is preferred over IV supplementa­tion. If oral medication is tolerated, K
+
supple-
ments can be given as an oral dose of 20 mEq KCl every 30–60 minutes or 40–60 mEq every 4–6 hours until the goal level is reached.
3
Liquid solu­tions are more absorbable but tablets are better tolerated.
If hypokalemia is symptomatic or causes ECG changes, patients should be treated with IV KCl and continuous ECG monitoring. KCl is generally given as 10–20 mEq mixed in 50–100 ml sa line infused over 1 hour through a large bore periph­eral IV. A dose of 20 mEq should increase the serum K
+
by approximately 0.25 mEq/L.3After
IV dosing of K
+
, a maintenance IV can be given that should contain no more than KCl 40 mEq per liter bag. If the solution causes burning, it should be diluted with saline preferentially to slowing the rate of potassium repletion. Potas­sium phosphate can be used instead of KCl in
045
21:05:58
those patients thought to have hypophosphatemia such as those in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
1
In this specific population, insulin administration should be delayed if serum K
+
is < 3.5. Decreased
magnesium levels should be addressed simult an­eously; combined deficiency with hypokalemia can increase the risk for cardiac dysrhythmias.
5
Laboratory monitoring should be done every 2–4 hours to determine the response to the potas­sium replacement. Consideration for causes of hypokalemia should be given while the patient is in the OU. For example, measures may include adding or substituting a potassium sparing diur­etic for a current loop or thiazide diuretic in con­sultation with the patient’s primary care provider. (Table 41.1)
Hyperkalemia
Hyperkalemia, a serum potassium (K+) > 5.5 mEq/L, mandates that hemolysis during phlebot­omy, extreme elevations of platelets or of white blood count first be ruled out. Acidosis, β-block­ade, and digital is toxicity can cause hyperkalemia by shifting K
+
from inside the cells to the extra-
cellular space.
1
Tissue injury or necrosis from rhabdomyolysis, tumor lysis or severe burns can cause life-threatening hyperkalemia from release of intracellular K
+.6
Medications including potas­sium sparing diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin recep­tor blockers (ARBs) can precipitate increased K
+
in those with renal insufficiency (RI). A history of β-blocker or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAI D) use should be noted. Patients with
chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) are generally able to excrete K
+
normally unless their kidney
disease is severe (GFR < 15– 20 ml/min).
6
While there are classic ECG findings associ­ated with hyperkalemia, some patients will have a relatively normal EKG even with severe hyperka­lemia yet develop potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias without warning.
7
The rate of the
rise in serum K
+
may be more important than the absolute value. There is much inter-patient variability in clinical presentation and response to treatment.
8
A patient with a serum K+> 6.5 mEq/L, on digoxin, with acid-base abnormalities, wide QRS complex or absence of P waves may be inappropriate for the OU. A stable chronic renal failure (CRF) patient without ECG changes and a K
+
< 7 mEq/L without those ECG abnormalities
may be appropriate for stabilization in the OU as a bridge to hemodialysis within the next 12 hours.
Treatment
Initial management of the hyperkalemic patient occurs in the ED prior to the OU. A repeat potas­sium level should be drawn to verify the level and an ECG performed. Treatment should be initiated immediately if hyperkalemia is suspected without waiting for laboratory confirmation, and continu­ous ECG monitoring performed. There are three treatment strategies: stabilization of cell mem­branes, shifting extracellular potassium into the intracellular space, and promoting loss of potas­sium through renal and gastrointestinal systems.
4
The initial treatment of hyperkalemia is 10–20 ml of 10% calcium gluconate IV over 2–5 min­utes, which can be repeated in 5–10 minutes.
4
Calcium antagonizes the toxic effects of hy perka­lemia on the myocardium, but its protective effects last only 60 minutes and other interven­tions must be started simultaneously.
9
Regular insulin 10 units IV with 50 ml of 50% dextrose will shift potassium into the cell for an expected fall in plasma K
+
of 0.5 to 1.5 mEq/L with peak
effect within 30–60 minutes.
4
If the glucose is
above 250, insulin can be given without dextrose.
1
High-dose nebulized albuterol 10–20 mg results in a shift of extracellular potassium into cells within 1–2 minutes with peak effect lasting 90–120 minutes.
10
Up to 40% of renal dialysis patients may not respond to β-agonists even if not on β-blockers.
4
There is an additive decrease
in serum K
+
if both insulin/glucose and nebulized
albuterol are given together, decreasing serum
Table 41.1 Hypokalemia Management in the Observation Unit
Oral supplementation (if possible): 10–120 mEq/day or 40–60 mEq of KCl every 4–6 hours in divided doses. High potassium foods give more gradual increase than oral K
+
concentrates
Intravenous KCl 10–20 mEq in 50–100 ml over 1 hour infused through large bore IV. If burning from the infusion, may need to dilute the solution rather than slow the repletion rate
If needed, a maintenance IV can contain up to KCl 40 mEq per liter bag
Check and replete magnesium as needed
Monitor K
+
closely during replacement. Continuous
ECG monitoring if administering IV
Electrolyte Abnormalities
045
21:05:58
K+by an average of 1.21 mEq/L.8Research has not supported the role of bicarbonate in routine treatment for hyperkalemia, and its use may be limited to those with hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis.
Potassium levels should be rechecked at regu­lar intervals. In the presence of intact renal func­tion, a potent loop diuretic such as furosemide 40–80 mg IV or ethacrynic acid 50–100 mg IV can be used to remove potassium from the body.
4
Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, Kayexalate®) as oral dose or enema exchanges Na
+
for K
+
across the intestinal wall but has not been shown to increase K
+
excretion in the stool any more
than expected in diarrhea induced by laxatives.
5
A recent review does not support the use of SPS for hyperkalemia due to lack of evidence and potential risks.
10
Hemodialysis is the most effective way to remove potassium from the body. Preven­tion should be addressed. Medication lists should be reviewed along with diet discussion including the use of salt substitutes. Medications that slow progression of kidney disease such as ACE­inhibitors and ARBs may need to have dose adjust­ment or other agents prescribed.
6
Medication adjustments may have to be made in patients with heart failure and hypertension.
5
Changes should
be made in collaboration with the patientspri­mary physician, as ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, ARBs, and potassium-sparing diuretics may be lifesaving in heart failure patients, with plans for close outpatient follow-up. See Table 41.2.
Calcium
Calcium is involved in nerve conduction, muscle contraction and blood coagulation. Only 1% of the calcium in the body is in the ECF compart­ment. Measured serum calcium includes that which is bound and unbound to albumin, and should be corrected for low albumin states:
Corrected Ca
þ2
ðmg=dlÞ¼measured
Ca
þ2
ðmg=dlÞþ½0:8×4-albumin ðgm=dlÞ:
Alkalosis increases binding of calcium to albumin so that for each 0.1 rise in pH the ionized Ca
+2
is lowered by about 3–8%.3Respiratory alkalosis or hyperventilation can inc rease protein binding, decreasing ionized calcium. Correction of cal­cium disorders in the OU mandates measure­ment of serum magnesium, albumin, creatinine,
and phosphate. Tests such as serum parathor­mone (PTH) levels, 25-OH D3, and 1, 25-(OH)
2
D3 levels may be helpful in tracking the etiology, but are of little relevance in the observation medi­cine setting.
Hypocalcemia
Hypocalcemia, ionized calcium < 2.1 mEq/L (or < 1.05 mmol/L) in the ambulatory popula­tion, is seen in patients with hypoparathyroidism (primary or iatrogenic) or CRF due to hyperpho­sphatemia and decreased activated vitamin D. Hypomagnesemia may exist in conjunction with low serum calcium in patients with alcoholism, diuretic use, epilepsy, and renal failure, and
Table 41.2 Hyperkalemia Management in the Observation Unit
Treatment Onset and Duration
of Action
Calcium gluconate 10 ml of 10% solution IV over 2–5 minutes. Calcium chloride as alternative. Repeat dose in 5–10 minutes if no effect.
Effects within 1–3 minutes, duration 30–60 minutes. Start other treatment simultaneously.
10 U regular insulin with 50 ml 50% dextrose (hold the glucose if BS > 250).
Effects within 15–30 minutes, lasts 4–6 hours. Produces fall in K
+
of
0.5–1.5 mmol/L.
Beta-2 agonists: albuterol high-dose 10–20 mg via high flow nebulizer which may be repeated in 2 hours.
Onset within several minutes, lasting 1–2 hours. Lowers K
+
0.6-1
mmol/L.
Furosemide 40–80 mg IV or ethacrynic acid 50–100 mg IV if renal function intact. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate: 20–50 grams with 100 ml of 20% sorbitol every 4–6 hours. May give 50 g as enema with 50 ml of 70% sorbitol and 100–150 ml water, retained for 1–2 hours.
Consider need for dialysis. Address access and consult nephrology.
Immediate effect but may have rebound hyperkalemia from intracellular K
+
shifts.
Monitor K
+
closely during interventions. Address potential causes including medications that increase serum potassium: ACE inhibitors, NSAIDs, K
+
-sparing diuretics, ARBs, β-blockers.
Kimberly A. Ressler and Jonathan Glauser
045
21:05:58
induces PTH resistance and decreased secretion of PTH.
3
Symptoms of hypocalcemia due to the neuromuscular excitability depend on the absolute level of serum calcium and how rapidly the decline occurred. Chvostek’s or Trousseau’ssigns,myalgia, cramps, and paresthesias should not preclude observation care.
11
Patients with symptoms such as hypotension, psychosis, confusion, or ventricu­lar dysrhythmias are inappropriate candidates for observation care. The differential diagnosis of hypocalcemia is broad, and often impractical to accomplish in a 24-hour stay. Following thyroid or parathyroid surgery, the cause may be obvious.
Treatment
Correction of hypocalcemia is dictated by symp­toms and underlying etiology. ED OU workup should include renal function, electrolytes includ­ing magnesium, ionized calcium level, and albu­min. PTH and vitamin D levels may be obtained to guide further workup as an outpatient. IV calcium replacement should be used if symptoms are present or the hypocalcemia is severe (ionized Ca
+2
< 1.3 or 0.65 mmol/L).
3
Calcium is given as chloride (360 mg of elem-
ental calcium in 10 ml) or gluconate (93 mg of elemental calcium in 10 ml over 2–5 minutes) for an initial adult dose of 100–300 mg of calcium diluted with 5% dextrose.
1
Calcium gluconate is preferred over calcium chloride because of less local tissue irritation and lower risk of tissue necrosis with extravasation. A continuous infu­sion may be needed to prevent further episodes and is achieved by mixing ten 10 ml ampules of 10% calcium gluconate in one liter of 5% dextrose or 0.9% saline infused at 50 ml/hr and titrated to level of calcium.
11
Patients receivin g IV calcium should have continuous ECG monitoring to evaluate for bradycardia or heart block. Oral supplementa­tion should be started i n the OU with 1000–2600 mg of calcium carbonate or calcium citrate daily in divided doses between meals.
4
If the patient is on digitalis, calcium administration should be done cautiously and more slowly. Hypomag­nesemia if present should be addressed. See Table 41.3.
Hypercalcemia
The two most common causes of hypercalcemia are hyperparathyroidism and malignancy, notably
myeloma, breast, renal, and non-small cell lung cancer. Hypercalcemia from malignancy is a poor prognostic sign.
12
Medications such as thiazide diuretics, lithium, and calcium-based antacids can contribute to hypercalcemia, especially in the dehydrated patient. Granulomatous disorders including sarcoidosis and tuberculosis cause hypercalcemia related to excessive 1,25-(OH)
2
Vitamin D production.1Patients appropriate for the OU include those with trouble concen­trating, personality changes, fatigue, weakness, and nausea. Symptoms may relate to the time frame of elevation as much as to the actual cal­cium level. Patients with altered mentation, stupor, o r coma, or requiring an extensive diag­nostic workup are inappropriate for observation stay. Prior to the OU, the cause for hypercalce­mia such as malignancy, sarcoid, or hyper PTH should be evident.
Treatment
The goals of treatment include identifying the cause and reducing serum calcium, especially via rehydration. Laboratory workup should include calcium, albumin, ionized calcium, renal function tests, magnesium, and potassium. Isotonic saline IV should be started with 1–2 liters over the first hour followed by 4–6 liters in the next 24 hours.
4
Table 41.3 Hypocalcemia Management in the Observation Unit
Calcium gluconate 10 ml, 10% (93 mg elemental Ca) diluted in 50 ml of D5 or NS, over 5 minutes. Slow rate of infusion by half; use with caution if patient is on digitalis.
As alternative, may give calcium chloride, but it has increased risk of tissue irritation and tissue necrosis with extravasation.
If needed, can use continuous infusion of Calcium Gluconate: 10 ampules (930 mg) in 1000 ml bag of 5% dextrose or 0.9% NS given over 24 hours. Consider administration of parenteral calcium until serum calcium reaches 7–7.5 mg/dL.
Continuous ECG monitoring while giving IV Ca
++
.
Evaluate and treat for hypomagnesemia.
Oral calcium supplements 1000–1500 mg/day in divided doses 2–4 times daily with calcium carbonate or citrate between meals.
Consider Vitamin D supplementation if replacement: Calcitriol 1,25 (OH)
2
D 0.25-2 mcg/day.
Electrolyte Abnormalities
045
21:05:58
Rates should be adjusted to degree of hypercalce­mia, fluid status, and ability to toler ate volume expansion.
1
The role of loop diuretics in the man­agement of hypercalcemia should be limited to management of volume overload, which generally is not present.
13
After saline hydration, bisphosphonate ther-
apy is the pharmacologic treatment of choice.
14
Bisphosphonates are given as a single IV infusion over 15 minutes to 4 hours, with an expected ensuing reduction in Ca
++
after 24–72 hours.
Recommended doses are pamidronate 90 mg or zoledronate 4 mg as a single infusion.
13
For severe symptoms, subcutaneous calcito-
nin (4 U/kg) can be given every 12 hours, which should decrease the calcium level within 12–48 hours, and as quickly as 2 hours.
14
Calcitonin can be given simultaneously with the bispho­sphonates.
13
If hypercalcemia is due to excessive Vitamin D production, as in patients with gran­ulomatous diseases such as sarcoid or lymph­oma, glucocorticoids should be administered.
1
(Table 41.4)
Magnesium
Magnesium is mostly intracellular with only 1% present in the serum for a normal value of
0.74–0.95 mmol/L (1.7–2.2 mg/dL).
4
It is a cofac­tor in cell metabolism, protein synthesis, and neuromuscular activity.
3
It plays a role in the
bodys regulation of potassium and calcium, and a low serum magnesium may not accurately reflect total body deficit.
Hypomagnesemia
Magnesium depletion typically is due to renal wasting (alcohol, diuretics) or GI losses (diarrhea, malabsorption, fistula) and is frequently seen in patients with alcoholism, poor nutrition, cirrho­sis, pancreatitis, or chronic diarrhea.
3
It is the most common electrolyte abnormality in the ambulatory diabetic patient and is frequently seen in DKA.
1
Proton pump inhibitors may contribute to hypomagnesemia by increasing GI losses of magnesium.
2
Correction of low magnesium may be necessary to treat refractory hypokalemia and hypocalcemia. With the exception of those with life-threatening dysrhythmias, tetany, and seizures, patients with hypomagnesemia are often good candidates for correction in the OU. For diagnostic purposes, the fractional excretion of magnesium can distinguish renal wasting from GI loss:
FEMg
þ2
¼fðUrine Mgþ2times plasma
creatinineÞ=0:7 times ðplasma Mg
þ2
times urine CrÞg times 100
If FEMg+2> 2%, one can generally assume
renal magnesium wasting.
4
Treatment
Clinical signs and symptoms usually do not occur unless magnesium is below 1.2 mg/dL (0.49 mmol/L), at which point the patient should be treated with IV magnesium.
15
Adequate renal function should be confirmed prior to replace­ment of magnesium (Mg
2+
), with dose reductions
of 50–75% for RI.
16
The initial dose is 2–4 grams of 50% magne-
sium sulfate in saline or dextrose given over 30–60 minutes.
1
Consensus statements recom-
mend 6–12 grams of magnesium sulfate IV over the first 24 hours.
16
During treatment, the
Table 41.4 Hypercalcemia Management in the Observation Unit
Treatment Comments
Saline fluid bolus by giving 1–2 L of 0.9% saline IV over first hour followed by 4–6Lof saline over 24 hours at rate of 200–300 ml/ hour. Keep urine at 100–150 ml/hour.
Monitor for fluid status with hydration especially in the elderly. Use furosemide only if volume overload present.
Bisphosphonates: Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV over 30 minutes (at least 15 minutes) or Pamidronate 60–90 mg IV over 2–4 hours.
Effects within 1–3 days. Usually well-tolerated, may cause arthralgias, fever, myalgia, fatigue. Slow rate or decrease dose in renal failure.
Salmon calcitonin 4 IU/kg subcutaneously, may be repeated in 6–12 hours for Ca
+2
> 14.
Lowers Ca
+2
in 12–48 hours, short-term use only due to tachyphylaxis.
Steroids: prednisone 40–60 mg/day for 3–7 days or hydrocortisone 100–300 mg daily.
Use if 1, 25-(OH)
2
Vitamin D mediated (lymphoma, sarcoid, myeloma). Effective within 2–5 days.
Kimberly A. Ressler and Jonathan Glauser
045
21:05:58