Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_902_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
116
https://t.me/medicina_free
14 Presentation, Symptoms, Imaging, Grading, andComplications ofUreteral Injuries
1. Intra-operative suspicion of ureteric injury: The patient is already in the Operating
theater and is under general or spinal anesthesia, retrograde urography is the
best choice, and is indeed the most sensitive imaging means for the detection of ureteral trauma.
2. Post-operative suspicion of ureteric injury suggested by specic complaints and
complications (pain, tenderness, raised creatinine, fever, inammatory markers, etc.): Ultrasonography is the most rapid test to orient the diagnosis but has limited sensitivity and specicity. If the suspicion of ureteral injury is strength­ened by the ultrasonographic ndings (ipsilateral hydronephrosis, free uid in the retroperitoneal or intraperitoneal cavity), a CTU will be the best imaging
modality to ascertain the diagnosis, harboring high specicity and sensitivity.
3. In a patient presenting with a history of trauma, either penetrating or blunt, the
rst imaging modality is an abdominal and pelvic multi-detector CT (MDCT) images or a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scan of the abdomen which will provide a view of the whole post-trauma damage. If the CECT-scan raised sus­picion of ureteral injury but provides unclear images of the anatomy, delayed­phase images, namely a CTU should be requested [4, 5].
4. Sometimes the patient might have an obvious obstruction or leak in the ureter
suggestive of ligation or transection, respectively, for which a percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) has already been performed. When a further denition of the lesion is necessary, the ideal modality here is an antegrade urography or
pyelography performed through the PCN tube, technically known as ante­grade nephrostogram (ANG).
After an initial non-contrast phase, CTU comprises three phases following IV-contrast injection [5] (Fig.14.1):
– Vascular (angiographic or corticomedullary) phase: at 25–40s after IV-contrast
injection.
– Nephrographic (parenchymal) phase: at 75–90s after IV-contrast injection, – Urographic (excretory) phase: at 3–5min after IV-contrast injection.
MR urography has a limited value in the evaluation of a suspected injured ureter because it doesn’t add much information compared to a CT scan, is not widely dis­tributed, is not cost-effective, and is time-consuming and therefore not suitable in an emergency setting. However, being radiation-free, it can be useful for selected cases such as pregnant women and children, with a reservation for the latter category who would require general anesthesia for the completion of the investigation.
As mentioned above, ultrasonography is only useful in the primary assessment of the kidney for any hydronephrosis suggestive of ureteric obstruction, and for the visualization of a free uid collection compatible with a urinoma. However, it has no value in the direct identication of a ureteric injury.
ac
14.3 Grading
https://t.me/medicina_free
117
d
b
Fig. 14.1 A 50-year-old woman presents with pain and fever after transabdominal hysterectomy. Excretory-phase CTU image shows right hydronephrosis (arrow, a) and a leak of contrast from the right distal ureter (arrow, b). (c) Retrograde pyelography conrmed right ureteral transection with a leak of contrast (arrow) (grade 3 injury). (d) Antegrade pyelography after percutaneous drainage of right hydronephrosis was performed for the management of the ureteral injury. (From Alabousi A. etal. [5], with permission from Springer)
14.3 Grading
The ureteral injuries are commonly described as per their anatomic location, being at the ureteropelvic junction, abdominal, or pelvic, or according to the timing of their diagnosis, being immediate (at the time of, or shortly after, the injury), or delayed [6]. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classi­cation is very widely used for kidney injury but is seldom utilized for ureteral
118
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
14 Presentation, Symptoms, Imaging, Grading, andComplications ofUreteral Injuries
Table 14.1 AAST ureter injury scale
Injury type Description of injury
Grade I Hematoma Contusion or hematoma without devascularization 2 II Laceration Less than 50% transection 2 III Laceration 50% or greater transection 3 IV Laceration Complete transection with less than 2cm of devascularization 3 V Laceration Avulsion with greater than 2cm of devascularization 3
Advance one grade for bilateral lesions up to grade III From Moore etal. [7], with permission from Elsevier
AIS 90
Fig. 14.2 (a) Left arteriogram showing contrast extravasating through the stula tract in a 65-year-old male patient who underwent radical cystectomy with ureterocutaneostomy 15months earlier. (b) The catheter entering the ureter through the stula of the iliac artery. (From Jiang Z etal. [11]. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License)
injuries and many Urologists are unfamiliar with it. It comprises the following grades [7] (Table14.1):
Contrary to kidney trauma, the majority of reported ureteric injuries are interme­diate and high grade (III and IV), but this might probably be due to underdiagnosis and underreporting of minor cases [8].
14.4 Complications ofUreteral Injury
Mild to moderate injuries caused by endourology might progress insidiously and give rise to delayed strictures with chronic hydronephrosis and progressive loss of kidney function. Serious ureteral injuries are associated with increased morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. Those subsequent to blunt or penetrating trauma are associ­ated with higher mortality because of associated injuries to other organs. Regardless of other associated injuries, ureteral perforation alone causes anuria (if solitary
References
https://t.me/medicina_free
119
kidney), uremia, urinoma, and ascites. In more severe cases, there might be abdomi­nal compartment syndrome and death [9].
The presence of an indwelling DJ stent, major pelvic vascular or visceral surger­ies may trigger an intense inammatory response around the ureters ending in an arterio-ureteral stula (AUF) [10, 11], a potentially life-threatening complication (Fig.14.2). When considering all possible causes, hundreds of cases of AUF stulae have been reported in the literature [12, 13]. A very recent comprehensive review included up to 445 patients with AUF and showed that the most common associated factors are chronic indwelling ureteral stents (80%) and a history of pelvic cancer (70%), the best diagnostic mean is angiography with 62% sensitivity, and the most predominant location is the common iliac artery ureteral crossing [14].
References
1. Medina D, Lavery R, Ross SE, Livingston DH.Ureteral trauma: preoperative studies neither predict injury nor prevent missed injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(6):641–4. https://doi.
org/10.1016/s1072- 7515(98)00108- 2.
2. Pereira BM, Ogilvie MP, Gomez-Rodriguez JC, Ryan ML, Peña D, Marttos AC, Pizano LR, McKenney MG.A review of ureteral injuries after external trauma. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757- 7241- 18- 6. PMID: 20128905; PMCID: PMC2830948
3. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam March 2022. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5. https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full- guideline/EAU-
Guidelines- on- Urological- Trauma- 2022_2022- 03- 24- 104100_fwda.pdf.
4. Ramchandani P, Buckler PM. Imaging of genitourinary trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1514–23. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2470.
5. Alabousi A, Patlas MN, Menias CO, Dreizin D, Bhalla S, Hon M, O'Brien A, Katz DS.Multi­modality imaging of the leaking ureter: why does detection of traumatic and iatrogenic ure­teral injuries remain a challenge? Emerg Radiol. 2017;24(4):417–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10140- 017- 1507- 5. Epub 2017 Apr 27
6. Engelsgjerd JS, LaGrange CA.Ureteral injury 2021. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
7. Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, McAninch JW, Browner BD, Champion HR, Flint LM, Gennarelli TA, Malangoni MA, Ramenofsky ML, etal. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma. 1989;29(12):1664–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039- 6109(16)46589- 8.
8. Best CD, Petrone P, Buscarini M, Demiray S, Kuncir E, Kimbrell B, Asensio JA. Traumatic ureteral injuries: a single institution experience validating the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale grading scale. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1202–5. https://doi.
org/10.1097/01.ju.0000155526.37963.ef.
9. Katz R, Meretyk S, Gimmon Z.Abdominal compartment syndrome due to delayed identica­tion of a ureteral perforation following abdomino-perineal resection for rectal carcinoma. Int J Urol. 1997;4(6):615–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442- 2042.1997.tb00320.x.
10. Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6(3):115–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287214526767.
11. Jiang Z, Wang J, Cui J, etal. Arterioureteral stula after radical cystectomy and ureterocutane­ostomy: two case reports and a systematic literature review. BMC Urol. 2022;22:117. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s12894- 022- 01071- y.
12. van den Bergh RC, Moll FL, de Vries JP, Lock TM.Arterioureteral stulas: unusual suspects­systematic review of 139 cases. Urology. 2009;74(2):251–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urol-
ogy.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Apr 10
120
https://t.me/medicina_free
14 Presentation, Symptoms, Imaging, Grading, andComplications ofUreteral Injuries
13. Turo R, Hadome E, Somov P, Hamid B, Gulur DM, Pettersson BA, Awsare NS. Uretero­arterial stula—not so rare? Curr Urol. 2018;12(1):54–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489419. Epub 2018 Jun 30. PMID: 30374282; PMCID: PMC6198778
14. Kamphorst K, Lock TMTW, van den Bergh RCN, Moll FL, de Vries JPM, Lo RTH, de Kort GAP, Bruijnen RCG, Dik P, Horenblas S, de Kort LMO.Arterio-ureteral stula: systematic review of 445 patients. J Urol. 2022;207(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002241.
Management ofUreteral Injuries:
https://t.me/medicina_free
Prevention, Conservative, andMinimally
15
Invasive Management
The management of ureteral injuries depends on the causes, either iatrogenic, blunt, or penetrating trauma.
15.1 Prevention andEarly Detection
This applies to iatrogenic ureteric injuries.
Obviously, in order to avoid ureteric damage during any open or laparoscopic surgery, the rst critical point is to identify and clearly visualize the ureters and many techniques and tricks help achieve this goal:
1. Pre-operative urteral catheter placement: There is a controversy on whether the
ureteric catheter prevents ureteric injury or just helps diagnose it once it has hap­pened, or is not effective in none [1].
A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteral catheters recruiting a
total of 102,370 patients with ureteric stents/catheters versus 767,233 controls, without randomization, paradoxically showed a higher rate of ureteric inju- ries in stented patients than in the controls, which may retrospectively be attributed to a selection bias where the stented patients were selected based on a higher risk of ureteral injuries and more complex surgeries [2].
A nationwide survey conducted among Swiss surgeons showed that 93.5% of them considered that ureteral stenting was useful in complex procedures, 56.9% of them admitted the use of stents at least once in the past year, and 54.5% of the participants considered only noninvasive techniques for identifying ureters in their regular daily practice [3].
Anyway, to date, there is insufcient data to conclude about the effective­ness of the stents to decrease ureteric injury or increase intraoperative detection of ureteral injuries.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 S. A. AL-Mamari, Urogenital Trauma: A Practical Guide,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6171-9_15
121
122
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Management of Ureteral Injuries: Prevention, Conservative, and Minimally…
However, the European Association Of Urology (EAU) recommends the pre-operative prophylactic use of stents in high-risk cases (major procedures, large pelvic tumors, or history of previous surgery with distorted anatomy) [4].
Technology to enhance ureteric detection: Early clinical experience of
lighted ureteral catheters was published in the mid-90s; however, they are still not widely distributed [5, 6].
A novel technology was recently introduced using stents coated with biocom­patible uorescent material (NICE: near-infrared coating of equipment) with conclusive results in pigs and human cadavers [7] (Figs.15.1 and 15.2).
Fig. 15.1 (a, b) NICE- coated catheter demonstration under white light (a) and near-infrared light (b). (From Barberio etal. [7] Commons Creative License)
a
b
ab
15.1 Prevention andEarly Detection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 15.2 Demonstration of a NICE-coated catheter under white light (a) and near-infrared mode (b). The arrow highlights the uorescence reference card. Contrary to humans, the ureter is easily visible under white light in pigs due to the thin overlying tissues. (From Barberio et al. [7] Commons Creative License)
123
2. No-stent tricks and technique: Where no ureteric tube is used, the ureter may be identied through its characteristic vermiculations (peristalsis). If sluggish or at prolonged intervals, these reptations can be stimulated by gentle manual pres­sure, the so-called “Kelly’s sign”. There is also a promising rat model that showed perfect visualization of the ureters and their vasculatures after intrave­nous administration of sodium uorescein and activation with a 530-nm light transmitter, with no stent use [8].
3. Finally, once a ureteric injury is suspected, on-table IVP or an retrograde pyelography (RGP) or retrograde injection of methylene blue are easy and effective diagnostic methods [9].
Regarding ureteral injuries in endourological procedures, the following rec-
ommendations should be considered [10]
– Use of small-sized instruments, i.e., to adapt the instruments to the patient’s
anatomy and not vice-versa.
– When the ureter is deemed narrow, leave a ureteral stent and retry the interven-
tion after a few weeks, to allow time for passive ureteral dilatation. – Use baskets with utmost care under direct vision. – Fragment the ureteral stones from the center, far from the mucosa.
Abboudi etal. have suggested a practical algorithm to manage an intra- operatively
suspected ureteric injury [11] (Fig.15.3).
Notwithstanding the above recommendations of clearly visualizing the ureter to
prevent injury and proceeding to its immediate repair or stenting if diagnosed intra­operatively, the situation may sometimes dictate priority to the patient survival in
124
https://t.me/medicina_free
15 Management of Ureteral Injuries: Prevention, Conservative, and Minimally…
Suspected ureteric injury
Cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography and/or ureteroscopy
Injury
Ureteric stent and/or ureteral catheter
Successful
Close monitoring
of urine output and
renal function and
postoperative CT
Reassess extent of ureteric injury with CT and/or
ureteroscopy and decide on definitive management
Nonsurgical management Surgical management
Open or laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy.
psoas hitch, and/or Baori flap
Unsuccessful
Percutaneous nephrostomy
and antegrade stent
Successful
output and renal function plus
Laparoscopic
exploration
and repair
No injury
Ureteric stent is possible,
but not mandatory
Close monitoring of urine
postoperative intravenous
or CT urogram
Unsuccessful
Open
exploration
and repair
Open or laparoscopi ureteroureterostomy
Fig. 15.3 A suggested schematic for the clinical management of an intraoperatively suspected ureteric injury. (From Abboudi H etal. [11], with permission from Springer Nature)
cases with severe bleeding and therefore a so-called “damage-control strategy” should be preferred, consisting of ligation of the damaged ureter and urinary diver­sion with a temporary nephrostomy, and a repair to be considered later [12].
15.2 Minimally Invasive Techniques inUreteral Injury
1. Percutaneous nephrostomy, antegrade or retrograde DJ stenting with or without balloon dilatation: A review of post-open hysterectomy ureteral injury
showed a successful rst attempt stenting of 52.4% within a median time of 25days. However, out of those who had successful stenting, only 27.3% had a resolution of the ureteral injury requiring no further intervention, and others required open delayed reconstruction [13] (Fig.15.4a–d).
15.2 Minimally Invasive Techniques inUreteral Injury
https://t.me/medicina_free
125
a
c
d
b
Fig. 15.4 (a–d) 38-year-old man with a history of right iatrogenic lower ureteric injury sustained during an endourological procedure. (a) Antegrade nephrostogram showing severely strictured distal right ureter (prone position). (b) Successful negotiation of a guidewire through the stricture. (c) Balloon dilatation of the stricture. (d) Successful antegrade insertion of the DJ stent. (Courtesy Mahmood Al Hajri, Interventional Radiologist, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman)