Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_888_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
276
Fig. 20.5 Port placement for a right-handed surgeon addressing a lower midline defects. We initiate the dissection in the upper portion of left retrorectus space. Balloon dissector is used at port position #1 to develop the left retrorectus space, followed by direct visualization for placement of port #2 into the developed space with an optional port #3. Port #4 is used as a camera port
Fig. 20.6 Medial aspect of the left posterior rectus sheath is incised and the preperitoneal space entered just supercial to falciform ligament
F. M. M. de Oliveira et al.
sharply dissect the distal attachments, thus mobilizing it downward. Alternatively, the sac can be sharply entered and laparoscopic adhesiolysis performed as needed.
Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR)
For more complex defects that require large mesh placement, the TAR procedure is added [9, 10]. We have found that incorporation of TAR is benecial in cases with wide (>10cm) defects, narrow (<5cm) retrorectus spaces, or when dealing
20 Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: MIS Extraperitoneal Repair Techniques
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 20.7 The right posterior rectus sheath is identied and its medial aspect incised and then released in a cephalad to caudal direction followed by blunt dissection in the right retrorectus space
Fig. 20.8 The cut edge of PRS is retracted medially revealing the posterior lamina of the internal oblique muscle, a thin layer of connective tissue covering. Once identied and incised with hook electrocautery, the transversus abdominis muscle bers can be appreciated
277
with a poorly compliant abdominal wall. Any defects in the posterior layer are closed with 2-0 absorbable suture. The abdominal wall defect is primarily closed using 0 barbed suture in running fashion, while pneumoperitoneum is dropped to 8mmHg.
For defects wider than 10cm, primary fascial closure can rarely be achieved under physiologic tension unless additional component separation in the form of TAR is added to the procedure. The edge of the cut posterior rectus sheath (PRS) on one side is retracted medially, and a thin, almost transparent layer of connec­tive tissue that covers the transversus bers is identied as the posterior lamina of the internal oblique muscle and incised with hook electrocautery, thus expos­ing the transversus abdominis muscle bers (Fig.20.8). Care must be taken to stay medial to the perforating nerves and vessels at the linea semilunaris to main­tain functional segmental innervation to the rectus (Fig.20.9). Hook cautery is used to elevate and transect the exposed transversus bers, revealing the glisten­ing transversalis fascia underneath. This is continued from cephalad to caudad until the transversalis fascia is seen as a glistening line extending the entire cra­niocaudal length of the abdominal wall. Blunt dissection is now used to develop the plane just deeper to the transversus muscle bers and supercial to the trans­versalis fascia resulting in a retromuscular preperitoneal plane, thereby achiev­ing TAR (Fig.20.10). The plane can be extended in the lateral direction as far as
278
Fig. 20.9 When incising the lateral edge of the PRS sheath to expose the transversus abdominis, care must be taken to prevent injury to the neurovascular bundles near the linea semilunaris
Fig. 20.10 The transversalis fascia is separated from the transversus abdominis by blunt dissection achieving TAR
F. M. M. de Oliveira et al.
the midaxillary line. A unilateral TAR can achieve as much as 7cm of medial fascial mobilization at the level of the umbilicus. Bilateral TAR can be performed as needed.
Closure
Posterior layer: The edges of the PRS are sutured together in the midline with 2-0 absorbable or barbed suture starting near the xiphoid process running caudally. Starting at the dome of the bladder, the surgeon and assistant switch positions, and suture is run cranially, meeting in the middle where the two sutures are tied together.
Anterior layer: Pneumoperitoneum is dropped to 8–10mmHg to decrease the tension placed on the anterior layer closure. The defect being closed is at the top of the monitor and is sutured “upside down” with back-handed needle driving. A 0 barbed suture is used for this closure due to technical ease of use afforded in this situation. If a large subcutaneous sac is present, one or more bites of the sac are included in the suture line for plication in order to reduce the likelihood of develop­ing a postoperative seroma (Fig.20.11). With the previously performed posterior
20 Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: MIS Extraperitoneal Repair Techniques
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 20.11 Closure of the anterior layer. A 0 barbed suture is used in a back-handed fashion with an “upside down” view to take bites of the edges of the defect while including the sac (if a large subcutaneous portion is present) in between to reduce the chance of postoperative seroma
279
CS, the defect edges should come together in a tension-free fashion. The defect is closed with v-lock suture, completed with four or ve throws run in a backward fashion.
Mesh Placement
Once both anterior and posterior fascial layers are closed, the mesh is deployed in the retromuscular sublay position. The developed retromuscular space is measured for appropriate mesh size selection. Our preference is medium-weight macroporous polypropylene mesh which is deployed through our 12-mm trocar (Fig. 20.12). There is no need for antiadhesion barriers as there now exists an autologous barrier between the mesh and viscera, a signicant advantage of the sublay position. Mesh placement in the retromuscular space has allowed for the discontinuation of aggres­sive penetrating xation techniques with transfascial sutures, transitioning rst to brin glue and, more recently, to complete cessation of mesh xation as our data illustrates penetrating xation is associated with higher incidence of chronic pain without the added benet of lowered rates of recurrence. Pneumoperitoneum is released under direct vision, assuring the mesh is lying at and wrinkle-free between the posterior and anterior layers.
Formerly, we once placed drains just supercial to the mesh in all hernia repair cases. We are now more selective with drain placement and do not utilize it for most patients. To date we have not observed an increase in wound morbidity as a result.
Transabdominal Approach
Alternatively, traditional laparoscopic transabdominal approach can be used. Standard laparoscopic entry to the peritoneal cavity can be achieved and adhesions taken down. The PRS is then incised just lateral to the defect or the linea alba. Dissection can proceed from there as we described in l-TAR originally, prior to our adoption of the eTEP access approach [11]. This lateral approach comes with higher degree of difculty on the midline suturing for closure.
280
Fig. 20.12 Placement of a medium-weight macroporous polypropylene mesh deployed through the 12-mm trocar. There is no need for antiadhesion barriers as there now exists an autologous barrier between the mesh and viscera
F. M. M. de Oliveira et al.
Postoperative Management
Patients are transferred from the PACU for admission to the wards or alternatively discharged to home as determined by the complexity of the surgery and other patient factors. Those that underwent an eTEP access Rives-Stoppa repair (retrorectus mesh placement) are typically discharged home the day of surgery. Diet is advanced as tolerated, and patients are encouraged to ambulate early and often as possible to prevent postoperative ileus or thromboembolism. The average length of stay at our center following eTEP access TAR procedures is approximately 1–2days. Prolonged postoperative ileus, although uncommon, is the primary cause for increased length of hospital stay.
Patients are discharged from the hospital once they are sufciently ambulating, tolerating oral intake, have a return of bowel function, and tolerating pain control without the need for intravenous medications. Typically, patients are seen 4weeks following surgery for their rst postoperative clinic visit; however, visits are sched­uled sooner (typically at 1week) if they are discharged with a drain in place.
MILOS andEMILOS Approaches
Since the space to be dissected is the same of eTEP, the contraindications are the same for the MILOS approach.
MILOS stands for mini and less open sublay and uses the hernia itself to get access to the preperitoneal space with a 2–6-cm skin incision directly over the cen­ter of the hernia defect, followed by exposure of the hernia sac (this can be widened for large incisional hernias), as described by Reinpold [12]. The hernia sac can be opened at this time to inspect the abdominal cavity, and this can be followed by open or laparoscopic adhesiolysis if necessary. The abdominal wall is lifted with retractors. After transhernial mini-open dissection of an extraperitoneal space of at least 8cm in diameter and closing of the peritoneal cavity, one can continue the procedure as total extra peritoneal gas endoscopy (TEP of the abdominal wall) using either standard trocars or a transhernial single port. Here the medial aspect of the posterior rectus sheath is opened under direct vision in both sides of the
20 Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: MIS Extraperitoneal Repair Techniques
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 20.13 MILOS technique—Transhernial exploration with exposition of the hernia defect [
13]
281
abdominal wall, enabling a large retromuscular pocket that can receive the mesh. This can be achieved using regular surgical and/or laparoscopic instruments. A spe­cial laparoscopic light source with a working channel in his middle designed to allow the use of regular laparoscopic instruments to dissect this space, normally without the use of a laparoscopic camera port is suggested [12, 13]. This device is called EndoTORCH Light Tube® (Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany). Very large synthetic meshes can be implanted if the size of the hernia requires it. A total sublay repair of the abdominal wall can be achieved with excellent results according to recent publications [12, 13] (Figs. 20.13, 20.14, 20.15, 20.16, 20.17, and 20.18).
The endoscopic mini/less open sublay (EMILOS) technique consists of a modi­cation described by Reinpold where the dissection of the retromuscular space is performed in an endoscopic fashion, using regular laparoscopic instruments and carbon dioxide insufation (or, e.g., using a single port) [14]. The procedure is the same as for MILOS operation until the transhernial exploration is done [13, 14]. After that the endoscopic part (which stands for the E in EMILOS) of the MILOS operation starts with the incision of the posterior sheath of the rectus muscle on one side. The rims of the opened fascia are marked with holding sutures. A sponge for­ceps is placed into the rectus sheath and directed toward the pubis, in a caudal direc­tion. In the original description, a balloon dissector is positioned down and inated, creating a space for safe introduction of the camera port. Carbon dioxide is started at this point, allowing gas to gain the preperitoneal space (sutures at the entrance to the rectus sheath are xed to the port to avoid leak). In the original description, a port is placed in this space and the 10-mm port is removed.
At this point, the opposite side of the posterior sheath of the rectus muscle is incised. These incisions on both sides are continued caudally and cranially as far as it is convenient in relation to the small skin incision. During this step, the
282
F. M. M. de Oliveira et al.
Linea Alba
Peritoneum
posterior lamina of the rectus sheath
dorsal view of the
ventral abdominal wall
Fig. 20.14 MILOS technique—Lifting of the abdominal wall with retractors and dissection of the preperitoneal space. Incision of the medial aspect of the posterior rectus sheath bilaterally to gain access to retromuscular space [12]
long narrow retractors
anterior lamina of the rectus sheath
Fig. 20.15 MILOS technique—Retromuscular nal positioning of the mesh, allowing a big overlap [12]
abdominal wall is elevated by retractors, always taking care to preserve the linea alba. Blunt detachment of the posterior sheath of the rectus muscle using the curved sponge forceps as far as it is possible is accomplished, accompanied by tight clo­sure of the skin incision. The camera is positioned in the lower trocar facing up and the carbon dioxide insufation restarted, which allows endoscopic visualization of the retromuscular space with the surgeon standing between the legs and the video tower behind the head of the patient. Dissection cephalad is achieved after
20 Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: MIS Extraperitoneal Repair Techniques
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 20.16 EMILOS technique—Positioning of a suprapubic trocar after creating the preperito­neal space downward to the pubis [14]
Fig. 20.17 EMILOS technique—Trocar positioning with the surgeon between patient legs and dissecting cephalad. Two port positioned in the hernia defect in this picture [
12]
283
introducing 5-mm working trocars on each side laterally to the midline in the medio-clavicular line and about 3–5cm above of the umbilicus under direct view. In a comfortable position, the surgeon can continue the incision of the posterior rectus sheath cranially up to the costal margin and the xiphoid. The space behind the costal margin as well as behind the sternum (fatty triangle) is easily dissected and opened for later mesh placement. It is always important to remember to pre­serve the linea alba; otherwise one will be working on the subcutaneous space. Detachment of the fascia from the rectus muscle while carefully preserving the vessels and the nerves perforating the fascia laterally is easily performed.
284
Fig. 20.18 EMILOS technique—Endoscopic view of the cephalad aspect of the dissection [14]
F. M. M. de Oliveira et al.
Introducing a 10-mm optic trocar about 5–7cm superior to the working trocars under view through the rectus muscle will allow continuation of the incision of the posterior rectus sheath downward to the arcuate line. The space of Retzius will be opened, and the dissection may be proceeded down to the pubic bone and below of the inferior suprapubic trocar.
A large mesh can be positioned in the enormous preperitoneal space prepared with the dissection described above. Drains are introduced via the 5-mm working trocars. The skin is reopened, the hernia defect is closed with a nonabsorbable run­ning suture in small bite technique, but the posterior rectus sheath is left open. The wound is closed and dressed, and an abdominal binder is placed [13, 14].
Onlay MIS Repair: Subcutaneous Onlay Laparoscopic Approach (SCOLA) andEndoscopic-Assisted Linea Alba Reconstruction (ELAR)
This technique has previous anecdotal descriptions and consists of performing a “subcutaneoscopic” dissection and is directed specially to small umbilical and epi­gastric hernias with concomitant rectus muscle diastasis [15]. Recently, a large series with description of the technique and results was published [16]. In this sub­set of patients, if one only corrects the hernia, the patient might still complain of the abdominal bulge of the rectus diastasis and will result in a higher recurrence rate [15, 16]. Only correcting the diastasis in an onlay fashion will result in a large scar, which is unacceptable from a cosmetic standpoint, especially since there’s no true hernia (and its consequences) in the diastasis part of the operation.
20 Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair: MIS Extraperitoneal Repair Techniques
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
285
Patient Positioning andTrocar Placement
The patient is positioned supine with the left arm tucked at the side and the right arm abducted. Another alternative is to open the patient’s legs. The endoscopic equip­ment is positioned to the left of the patient. The access route consists of a half loop on the left around the umbilicus, extending 2–3 cm cranially in the midline (Fig.20.19). Dissection of the umbilical hernia (if present) is performed as usual, and the anterior layer of the rectus sheath is exposed on both sides from the xiphoid process and extends several centimeters below the umbilicus. The anterior layer of the rectus sheath is freed from subcutaneous tissue by diathermy on both sides in a width of around 4–5cm. The original description uses regular surgical instruments, but one can use laparoscopic instruments and carbon dioxide insufation if desired. When using regular instruments, the surgeon has a direct view of the surgical area via the skin incision but needs the light source to that effect, while the two assistants watch the monitor of the video endoscopic equipment positioned to the right of the patient. A more ergonomic approach (SCOLA) is to be positioned in between the legs, with three ports positioned in the suprapubic area, 6 cm apart each other (Fig.20.20). A robotic approach can be performed as well, with docking from the left shoulder after the suprapubic port access.
SC Space Creation andMidline Plication
The surgeon starts the subcutaneous dissection from bottom up, until he or she reaches the subxiphoid area, going through the entire midline and associated her­nias, creating a 15-cm wide space (Fig.20.21). At this point, the surgeon can decide if only an approximation of the linea alba is necessary or if an incision needs to be made around 2cm from the medial margin of the rectus sheath to reinforce linea alba or to allow approximation without tension (described as endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction—ELAR [15, 16]). If not, the plication can be done with barbed sutures to facilitate after measuring the space and mesh size required
Fig. 20.19 ELAR—Size of the mesh (in blue line) and extent of skin incision [15]