Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_892_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
6 Advancements andInnovations inSleep Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
99
Nasal Surgeries
The internal nasal valve represents the area of highest resistance in the upper air­way. The internal nasal valve is composed of the nasal septum, the upper lateral cartilage, the head of the inferior turbinate, and the nasal oor. Airway patency can be enhanced by correcting a septal deviation, upper lateral stabilization, inferior turbinate reduction, or expansion of the nasal oor. Improving nasal patency decreases the associated sequence of mouth breathing, posterior tongue collapse, and hypopharyngeal narrowing. Treating nasal obstruction does not cure OSA.However, it improves continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compli­ance and sleep quality of life (QoL) [5]. A narrow nasal oor is a previously under­recognized cause of nasal obstruction and failure of nasal surgeries [6]. Nasal obstruction early on in life leads to a facial growth pattern characterized by trans­verse maxillary deciency. This is associated with nasal obstruction later in life and predisposes to sleep-disordered breathing, nasal surgery failure, and CPAP intolerance.
Maxillary Expansion—“Rhinognathic Surgery”
The dissociation of adult and pediatric OSA is articial. The underpinnings and development of OSA follow a continuum across age. Orofacial growth is inuenced by many upper airway variables with nasal airow playing a critical role. Mouth breathing and an abnormal position of the tongue in the oral cavity occurs when skeletal growth is at a maximum early in life, leading to a decrease in growth stimu­lation of intermaxillary cartilage [7]. That, in turn, leads to a high-arched palate and predisposes to sleep apnea later in life [8]. Furthermore, the dysfunction in facial growth has secondary consequences on the maxillomandibular position, and such changes have a negative feedback impact on the support of the muscles of the upper airway. Hence, skeletal development inuences dental occlusal angle, facial aes­thetics, and upper airway patency [9].
Ideally, transverse maxillary hypoplasia (TMH) is addressed while facial growth is still active [10]. There is strong evidence demonstrating the resolution of persis­tent pediatric OSA post adenotonsillectomy with maxillary expansion [11]. The need for a similar treatment in adults was observed by Christian Guilleminault of Stanford University [12, 13]. However, such as the cribriform plate, parts of the temporal bone, and zygoma. Excessive force applied to these areas can result in cerebrospinal uid leakage, transient hearing loss, and facial asymmetry.
Craniomaxillofacial surgeons conventionally perform surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) for adult TMH, which combines LeFort I level oste­otomies, pterygoid disjunction, and a tooth-anchored expander. However, there are a couple of drawbacks to this technique: [1] the LeFort I osteotomies are not enough for transverse expansion; therefore, a midpalatal suture split is required.
100
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y.-C. Liu and A. A. Al-Sayed
However, [2] even with multipiece osteotomies, the tooth-anchored expander exerts the lateralizing forces on the dentoalveolar segments, thus lateralizing the teeth more so than the split maxilla. Consequently, the SARPE does not ade­quately address the nasal oor, the key area in sleep-disordered breathing in adults [14].
The need to expand the maxilla of adults in a predictable, fast, and stable man­ner is clear. In fact, most surgical interventions for OSA focus on the Anterior­Posterior (AP) dimension of the airway. Even with expansion pharyngoplasty, where the goal is to expand the palatopharyngeus and palatoglossus muscles, the expansion is limited by the width of the maxilla. Hence, skeletal maxillary expan­sion would be the only procedure that addresses the lateral dimension of the skel­eton. Physiologically, the improvement in nasal breathing during sleep expands upper airway dilator muscles (Fig.6.2) [6, 15]. Maxillary expansion has both struc- tural and physiological contributions to a wider airway during sleep. It is important to note distraction osteogenesis maxillary expansion (DOME) is not meant to be a single procedure. Rather, in a patient- specic fashion, DOME has continually evolved to convert a high-arched palate to a dome-shaped palate [13]. Over time, with virtual surgical planning, Lefort guides to be used for nasal endoscopic approaches, and improved orthodontic anchorage devices, DOME is a patient-spe­cic approach to address nasal breathing during sleep. DOME has become an inte­gral part of the revised Stanford sleep surgery protocol. As the technique was rened over time, it is possible nowadays to perform the procedure in a minimally invasive nasal endoscopic approach (MINI- DOME) [16].
In this section, we will be reviewing the indications, contraindications, patient selection, diagnostic workup, specic risks, patient consent, anesthetic consider­ations, required equipment, procedural steps, complications, and postoperative care of DOME and MINI-DOME.
Fig. 6.2 Distraction Osteogenesis Maxillary Expansion (DOME) increases the transverse dimen­sion of the maxilla, which provides more space for the tongue to rest in the oral cavity. Additionally, it allows for greater pharyngoplasty expansion
6 Advancements andInnovations inSleep Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
101
Indications andContraindications
DOME is recommended generally for adults with OSA who have any or more of the following features: (1) TMH with or without crossbite, (2) persistent nasal obstruc­tion after nasal surgery with mild OSA and a high-arched palate, and (3) moderate to severe OSA with a high-arched palate as a phased procedure preceding further interventions. Contraindications to the procedure are relative and include: (1) peri­odontal disease, (2) inability or unwillingness to undergo perioperative orthodontic care, and (3) difculty adhering to distraction.
Diagnostic Workup
We strongly recommend a preoperative attended polysomnography (PSG), with attention to airow limitation. Maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) is neces­sary for virtual surgical planning (VSP) and assessment of surgical landmarks (pre­maxilla thickness, nasopalatine nerve position, and distance between central incisors roots). The thickness of the maxilla dictates the length of screws used on the expander. Pre- and posttreatment photos are recommended. It is important to note that one’s facial appearance does not change signicantly posttreatment.
Specic Risks, Patient Information, andConsent
Patients must be counseled about the goals of treatment. The most signicant and reproducible outcome is the subjective decrease in nasal obstruction as measured by the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale and the functional compo­nent of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS). For severe OSA, surgical success is approximately 70%, and these patients will continue to receive further interventions either in the form of other surgical proce­dures or CPAP.For patients with upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS), the reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) is signicant, but surgical success cannot be dened by the Sher’s criteria because pretreatment AHI is usually less than ten events per hour.
Surgical risks include loss of dental vitality, particularly of the central incisors; asymmetric maxillary expansion; inadequate expansion; and persistent paresthesia from the vestibular incision. VSP has signicantly reduced these risks. Moreover, the MINI-DOME approach signicantly reduces the risk of paresthesia and swell­ing [16]. Pain is minimal post procedure and could be managed with over-the­counter analgesia. A minority may require narcotics for the rst few days postoperatively. The risk of palatal stula is around 2% and most self-resolve.
102
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y.-C. Liu and A. A. Al-Sayed
Anesthesia andPatient Positioning
Oral intubation with total intravenous anesthesia is preferred to reduce postopera­tive nausea and vomiting. A exible reinforced tube is secured to one side of the oral commissure. The patient is turned 180° away from the anesthesia cart. Hypotensive anesthesia is rarely required as only Lefort level 1 osteotomies are performed. If both anterior and posterior maxilla need expansion (posterior for occlusion indica­tions), then the pterygoid junctions are separated.
Equipment
A standard head and neck or maxillofacial set including Bovie electrocautery, Molt periosteal elevators, toe-out retractors, curved Freer elevator, reciprocating saw, piezoelectric saw (optional), several straight osteotomes, and 3–0 and 4–0 chromic sutures. For MINI-DOME, a 0° rigid endoscope and a surgical assistant are required. Patient-specic cutting guides are recommended to reduce the chances of asym­metrical osteotomies, particularly in minimally invasive approaches.
Surgical Steps withFocus onEndoscopic Approach
Prior to surgery, the collaborating orthodontist has designed and sometimes placed the expander with the transpalatal implants. It is crucial that the implants are placed as medially as possible, straddling the midpalatal suture. Additional implants can be placed against the sides of the alveolus bilaterally near the molar region.
In the MINI-DOME approach, needle tip cautery is used to make a 1–1.5cm incision parallel to the piriform rim at the level of the head of inferior turbinate, and toward the anterior maxilla. This helps with closure at the end of the procedure. Molt periosteal elevator is used initially to obtain a subperiosteal pocket. Once an adequate pocket is developed, 0° endoscope is introduced to visualize the remainder of the inferolateral dissection toward the lateral maxillary buttress. Subperiosteal dissection can be quite limited because with guides, there is not a need to expose the infraorbital nerve and inferiorly to identify the canine eminence (Fig.6.3). A small malleable blade is fashioned to rest against the lateral buttress to retract the soft tis­sue away from the bony structures. It is helpful to rst cut at the middle of the clas­sic Lefort osteotomy, where the anterior maxillary wall is located. This would allow a natural drainage hole for the irrigation from ultrasonic cutting blades. This allows one less instrument in the nasal cavity (suction tip). After this drainage hole is cre­ated, the osteotomy is carried forward past the buttress and then outwards toward the piriform rim. The nasal incisions are closed on each side with 4–0 chromic sutures.
6 Advancements andInnovations inSleep Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
103
ab
Fig. 6.3 (a) Depicts the extent of dissection in a MINI-DOME.The Lefort I osteotomy. ION infraorbital nerve. (b) A custom made cutting-guide is inserted and secured. The bony cut is made with a piezoelectric saw
The primordial groove of the midpalatal suture is seen inferior to the anterior nasal spine, and between the apices of the maxillary central incisors. A piezoelec­tric saw, which does not cut the mucosa of the palate across the maxillary alveo­lus, is used to deepen the groove. Osteotomes are used in sequential fashion to wedge open the midpalatal suture from the groove. A diastema between the cen­tral incisors is seen immediately as the suture opens. The expander is then turned to ensure easy and symmetric separation of the maxilla bilaterally, until a 2mm separation is created. In adults, it is generally advisable to place a cancellous or a bone progenitor bone graft between the separated maxillae and not activate the expansion for about 10–14days. This will allow improved bony healing, which is not a concern in children. Closure of the vestibular wound is performed by 3–0 chromic sutures.
Complications
Major complications include bone healing issues such as malunion, nonunion, and asymmetric expansion. Minor asymmetric expansion can be corrected with ortho­dontics. Most bone healing issues self-resolve with completion of distraction. Rarely, they may require a secondary bone graft. V2 paresthesia is usually tempo­rary and resolves between 1 and 6months. Nasal sinus and odonotogenic infections have not been reported with DOME.Maxillary central incisors occasionally show signs of decreased perfusion. Loss of central incisors vitality requiring root canal treatment is less than 5%. No loss of dentition is reported with DOME. Patients with thin gingiva, which is common in OSA, likely benet from presurgical periodontal and bone grafting to prevent the dental complications.
104
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y.-C. Liu and A. A. Al-Sayed
Postoperative Care
Patients can be discharged home the same day. There are no true diet restrictions, though we advise a soft diet for a few days as the bone graft and wounds heal. Limited epistaxis and nasal congestion are expected and are self-resolving and is best addressed by nasal irrigation. Blood and blood clots collect in the maxillary sinus during the procedure.
Patients turn the expander daily at a rate of 0.25mm. For most patients, 7–12mm of expansion at the nasal oor is achieved within 4–6weeks. Orthodontic treatment is then applied to close the diastema, while the expander is left in place to prevent relapse during the bone consolidation period. Typically, the consolidation period is around 3-months for pediatric patients and 6–8 months in adults. The expander does not interfere with dental movement, allowing the restoration of proper occlusion without its removal. Average orthodontic treatment required is 12–18 months. Following orthodontic treatment, the expansion can be maintained passively by a removable retainer.
Outcomes
The early Stanford experience suggests the adult OSA patients with narrow and high-arched palate improve the most with DOME if they also have an acute internal nasal valve angle, narrow nasal oor, no signicant septal deviation or turbinate hypertrophy, and TMH recalcitrant to palatopharyngoplasty. For adults with moder­ate to severe OSA, multilevel or multistage treatments remain the hallmarks of effective surgical treatment. We have performed DOME in conjunction with genio­glossus/genioplasty advancements. For patients with both transverse maxillary and maxillary-mandibular hypoplasia, multistage treatment may be required. That is usually in the form of DOME followed by UPPP (uvulopalato-preservation pharyn­goplasty), upper airway stimulation, or maxillomandibular advancement (MMA). Post-DOME patients have shown resolution of circumferential collapse of the velum that would otherwise disqualify them from receiving upper airway stimulation.
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation (HGNS)
Loss of genioglossus muscle tone and upper airway collapse were rst reported by Remmers etal. in the late 1970s [17]. Since then, attempts to stimulate the pharyn­geal muscles with transcutaneous, intraoral, and intramuscular electrodes to treat OSA were of limited success [1820]. However, hypoglossal nerve stimulation has emerged as a viable alternative option to CPAP in treating moderate to severe OSA due to the technological advancement over the last decade [21, 22]. The indications,
6 Advancements andInnovations inSleep Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
patient selection process, contraindications, surgical technique, postoperative care, and complications are reviewed.
105
Indications andPatient Selection Process
All patients being considered for HGNS surgery must undergo a comprehensive sleep medicine history and upper airway evaluation including drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). HGNS is still considered a second line procedure after CPAP therapy intolerance or failure in patients with moderate to severe OSA.Additional screening criteria include a body mass index (BMI) of less than or equal 32kg/m2, and the absence of concentric velum collapse on DISE.The BMI cutoff has recently been increased to 35kg/m2 [23]. It is important to note that these criteria oversim­plify the complexity of OSA.The patient’s medical comorbidities and skeletal phe­notype should factor in the selection process. A history of breast cancer or breast augmentation may present a signicant challenge. Moreover, a patient with a nar­row, high-arched palate might be at a higher risk of failing the procedure due to the limited space for tongue displacement during stimulation, as well as persistent nasal obstruction.
Contraindications
Contraindications to HGNS can be relative or absolute. Relative contraindications include BMI more than 32kg/m2, electromagnetic incompatibility and interference from other implantable medical devices, and incompatibility and interference from diagnostic or therapeutic devices. Absolute contraindications include sleep study showing greater than 25% central or mixed apneas, concentric palatal collapse seen on DISE, inability to operate the therapy, pregnancy, severe anatomical challenges to implantation, severe neurological conditions, and anticipated or ongoing need for magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the head, cervical spine, or thorax.
Surgical Technique
There are multiple upper airway neurostimulation devices in development. However, there is only one currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, the outlined surgical steps are for the Inspire II Upper Airway Stimulation device (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., Maple Grove, MN). The outlined steps are meant to provide a high-level overview and do not address the nuances beyond the scope of this chapter. In addition, the senior author has moved away from the origi­nal three-incision technique to a contemporary two-incision technique.
106
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 6.4 The stimulation cuff electrode is placed around the distal protrusor branches of the hypoglossal nerve
S. Y.-C. Liu and A. A. Al-Sayed
The steps are as follows: after general orotracheal anesthesia, sensing electrodes are placed in the genioglossus muscle and the hyoglossus/styloglossus muscles for intraoperative nerve monitoring. After standard sterile prep and drape, a 4cm inci­sion is made in the right upper neck parallel to a natural skin crease and carried down to the oor of the submandibular triangle, where the main trunk of the hypo­glossal nerve is identied. Nerve monitoring is used to selectively capture the distal tongue protrusor branches and to exclude branches innervating the tongue retractor muscles. The stimulation cuff electrode is placed around the distal protrusor branches and C1 and secured to the digastric tendon (Fig.6.4). A second incision is made in the right upper chest with the development of a subcutaneous pocket over­lying the pectoralis fascia for the pulse generator. The pocket is carefully sized to t the implantable pulse generator with minimal dead space to minimize seroma for­mation. The sensing lead is then inserted between the external and the internal oblique intercoastal muscles and secured to a cuff of the external intercoastal mus­cle. The sensing lead and stimulation lead are each then tunneled into the right upper chest pocket and connected to the implantable pulse generator (IPG), which is secured to the pectoralis fascia. The telemetry unit is then activated, and the implant conrmed with both a good sensing lead waveform and uninhibited tongue protrusion.
Postoperative Care
Postoperative radiographs of the neck and chest are obtained before the patient is discharged to document the baseline position of the device and rule out pneumotho­rax. Patients can be discharged home the same day, but as they tend to be older, an overnight stay is advisable. They are instructed to avoid strenuous or repetitive activity of the ipsilateral arm for the rst 3–4weeks, although this is more permis­sive without the former third incision at right lower chest. Device activation is done
6 Advancements andInnovations inSleep Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
at approximately the 1-month mark. After patients adjust to the therapy, optimiza­tion of stimulation voltage is performed during an attended PSG.
107
Complications
Serious complications are uncommon in the published literature. Bleeding, infec­tion, and injury to the hypoglossal nerve or marginal mandibular nerve and pneumo­thorax formation are the main complications. Hardware failure can also be an issue, particularly with detachment of sensing or stimulation leads. Sleep disturbance and aggravation of insomnia are potential side effects of device activation.
Uvulopalato-“Preservation” Pharyngoplasty (UPPP)
Often referred as the workhorse of sleep apnea surgery, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) is performed alone or in conjunction with other surgeries. The procedure traces its origin to the 1950s [24]. Many technique variations have been described with varying degree of tissue sacrice. Moreover, most of these techniques do not account for the interaction between the vectors of tissue suspension and physiologic muscle function [25, 26]. The indications, patient selection process, contraindications, postop­erative care, complication, and outcomes are thoroughly described in the literature. Therefore, the focus in this section is on the senior author’s surgical technique that emphasizes tissue preservation and augmentation of airway dilator muscle function.
Surgical Technique
When present, tonsillectomy is performed in the standard fashion. After removal of the tonsils, the following vectors of horizontal mattress sutures are performed. First, the palatopharyngeus muscle is anchored to a brous pad at the retromolar trigone and secured to the palatoglossus muscle. Next, the medial palatopharyngeus muscle is sutured toward the levator veli palatini muscle. Finally, the newly approximated medial palatopharyngeus and levator muscles are anchored toward the tensor veli palatini muscle. The rst two vectors dilate the soft palate, whereas the last vector advances it. Overall, the vector of suspension augments the function of pharyngeal dilators and allows for maximal tissue preservation reducing postoperative pain and scarring in the long term (Fig.6.5). The uvula muscle is always preserved. However, there is often long-term negative pressure that results in elongated mucosa. The mucosa can be trimmed slightly, although this is often not necessary and needs to be judiciously performed to prevent velopharyngeal insufciency or globus sensation.
108
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 6.5 Using 3–0 Vicryl the palatopharyngeus muscle is anchored to a brous pad at the retro­molar trigone and secured to the palatoglossus muscle. Next, the medial palatopharyngeus muscle is sutured toward the levator veli palatini muscle. Finally, the newly approximated medial palato­pharyngeus and levator muscles are anchored toward the tensor veli palatini muscle. (a) Depicts presuspension and (b) Depicts postsuspension. Note that the uvula and muscles of the pillars are preserved
S. Y.-C. Liu and A. A. Al-Sayed
Postoperative Care
Unlike tonsil surgery for children, the senior author focuses on adequate pain con­trol for the adult patients so that they can eat as regular of a diet as possible. Active swallowing is important to prevent bleeding resulting from tearing of scab tissue as the wounds heal. Antibiotics have been shown to reduce the incidence of bleeding in OSA patients following UPPP [27].
Complications
The most serious complication is bleeding, and this is 5% [28]. Patients can help reduce incidence of bleeding by the postoperative care regimen as described. Surgically, the use of low heat on monopolar cautery and meticulous hemostasis with bipolar cautery are helpful. The less scabs created with accurate dissection in the avascular plane, the less likely for delayed bleeding. Hemostasis should also be checked with anesthesia directed Valsalva maneuver.
Genioglossus Advancement (GGA)
GGA was initially described by Riley and Powell in 1984 as an intervention for base of tongue collapse in a patient who had failed palate surgery [29]. Many variations of the original GGA have since been described, but they all share the common goal