Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5587_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
CASE STUDIES
Today, modern computational techniques revolutionized the drug design and discovery process by accelerating and economizing the procedure. There are successful QSAR-driven examples of drug design
projects which yielded pharmaceuticals already in the market or under investigation. Especially during past two decades, the toxicological based QSAR studies denoted by quantitative structure toxicity
relationship (QSTR) have received lots of attention (Zhu, 2013) deduced from the huge volumes of
reviews and research papers in the literature carried on several endpoints such as human health risk
effects including carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, liver effects and cardiac toxicity (Toropov, et al., 2014).
Few applications of 2D- and 3D-QSAR methods in drug design and development processes as well as
toxicity related examples have been presented in this section.
®
Norfloxacin (Noroxin)
investigated oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acids derivatives as the antibacterial agents and established a
QSAR model in which antibacterial activity was parabolically correlated to steric parameters (Koga,
Itoh, Murayama, Suzue, & Irikura, 1980). By structural modification of the compounds and subsequent
in vitro and in vivo studies, Norfloxacin reached the market. This drug is used in urinary tract infections.
In an attempt to design safe anti ulcer H
tiamide through the quantitative comparison of physicochemical properties and bioisosteric replacements
of thiourea group of metiamide by cyanoguanidine group (Durant et al., 1977; Topliss, 1993). When
Cimetidine was marketed in 1976, it was one of the largest selling pharmaceutical products in the world.
GRID based 3D-QSAR study on inhibitors of sialidases from both influenza viruses A and B based
on crystal structure of the enzyme leads to discovery of Zanamivir (Relenza)
1993). Active site structure was computationally probed using GRID program and the analyses suggested energetically favorable substitutions for modification of parent structure. It is the best example
of structure-based drug design approach.
is one of earliest examples of QSAR guided drug design. Koga and co-workers
blockers, Cimetidine (Tagamet)® was developed from me-
2
®
(von Itzstein et al.,
Table 2. Comparison of multidimensional QSAR studies carried out on two databases by Katritzkya et
al. (Katritzkya et al., 2007) and Damale et al. (Damale et al., 2014)
Study Database Method
2D-QSAR 36 BMLR 0.811 0.734 0.737 - 3D-QSAR
(steric fields)
3D-QSAR (electrostatic fields) 36 PLS 0.789 - 0.642 0.280 -
3D-QSAR (electrostatic fields) 36 Weighted-LS 0.931 - 0.847 0.434 0.522
3D-QSAR
(force fields)
4D-QSAR 106 Quasar - 0.810 0.788 - -
5D-QSAR 106 Quasar + induced fit - 0.872 0.790 - -
6D-QSAR 106 Quasar + solvation - 0.903 0.885 - -
26
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
36 PLS 0.937 - 0.811 0.624 0.715
106 AMBER(Macro- Model
AND AMSOL software)
2
R
- 0.821 0.563 - -
R
CV
2
R
2
pred
Q
R
2
ext
2

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
In a QSAR-directed design, a data set of tylophorine derivatives as anticancer agents was studied
using validated QSAR modeling and virtual screening. The original data set was split into training
and test set. The variable selection k-nearest neighbors (kNNs) method was used for descriptor selection followed by statistical evaluation procedures. Among the compounds predicted to be highly
active (the hits) based on QSAR analysis, the experimental studies showed that eighty percent of
them were active (Zhang et al., 2007). A similar QSAR study was performed for anticonvulsant
agents indicating a rational drug design of novel compounds before synthesis (Shen et al., 2004).
In our previous investigation, a 2D-QSAR study was conducted on arylbenzofuran derivatives
receptor antagonists. In this study, MLR-based QSAR models were generated using GA-
as H
3
PLS descriptor selection strategy with different kinds of descriptors. The predictive power of the
models was assessed by applying cross validation, external validation, and Y-scrambling methods.
The structural requirements needed for the antagonistic activity was identified. The result of this
investigation may aid to the development of new potent H
antagonists (Dastmalchi, et al., 2008).
3
As mentioned earlier, one of the important fields of QSAR application is the prediction of toxicity behavior of drugs and hazardous materials. Numerous examples can be found in the literature
on this topic and the full coverage is beyond this chapter. However, few examples are provided to
address some recent cases.
The developmental toxicity is an important endpoint for risk assessments of chemical exposure
in human health, and is often considered as hard to find data because of the cost and associated
complexity. In an interesting study, Craig et al. (Craig, Wang, & Zhao, 2013) have used a set of
free software and publically available toxicity databases to develop a single variable QSAR model
using log of octanol–water partition coefficient (log K
) for the prediction of developmental tox-
OW
icity of halogenated azole compounds. In order to increase the predictive power of the model, they
elegantly extracted 35 structurally similar toxic compounds for their QSAR study, and by doing so,
the developed model performs well on external dataset compounds provided that they fall within
the defined applicability domain (AD).
In an investigation conducted by Zarei et al. (Zarei, Atabati, & Kor, 2014), they have used a
QSAR approach based on bee colony algorithm and Adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS)
to predict the toxicity of 268 substituted benzene derivatives on Tetrahymena pyriformis. The bee
algorithm was used as feature selection tool to choose three structural variables describing hydrophobicity, number of electronegative groups and the molecular shape of the studied compounds,
which then they were used in the prediction step carried out by ANFIS method. As there is a good
agreement between fish (aquatic animal) toxicity and toxic potency of T. pyriformis (Netzeva, Pavan,
& Worth, 2008), the results of such in vitro predictions have practical applications in environmental
safety assessment.
The above mentioned case studies are few examples of using QSAR methodologies, which can be
used in predicting toxicity of newly designed and/or discovered drugs. However, there are numerous
studies in this field which can provide useful insights into drug design, toxicity, and development
processes. The data from these investigations have been organized in various toxicity databases
32
such as OECD QSAR Toolbox
, REACH33, TOXNET34, SIDER35, ACToR36, DailyMed37, DSSTox38
just to mention few (Panagiotou & Taboureau, 2012; Sullivan, et al., 2014; Toropov, et al., 2014).
These databases are valuable resources for QSAR studies.
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
27

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
In this chapter, we have tried to introduce almost main aspects of QSAR in drug design in an stepwise
manner. However, the chapter is not by any means thorough and the readers are encouraged to follow
the details of different topics covered here in the supplied references. The field of QSAR studies in
drug development is an open area and it seems that the current methods are far from predicting the
exact activity of the test compounds. However, as a principle, the prediction methods cannot provide
answer more accurate than the experimental data. The maximum accuracy one may expect to achieve
from QSAR modeling is in the order of biological data. Therefore, although not an inherent feature of
the modeling methods, the improved assay methods can have profound effects on the developed models. One of the main players of the QSAR studies is the way the chemicals are presented numerically
by the descriptors. There are huge numbers of descriptors which have been developed to capture the
molecular features. In most cases, they are calculated by programs with high speed and are used without any pre-judgment in the subsequent steps. But in most instances, the interpretation of the observed
activities based on the descriptors is not obvious. Development of new methods for presenting those
features of the molecular structures more relevant to drug-likeness may improve the applied aspects of
the QSAR modeling efforts. The choice of which algorithm should be used for descriptor selection is
also a challenging stage making it a vitally fundamental phenomena for generating QSAR models. The
better selection of descriptors, the more reliable the QSAR models. The important parts of every QSAR
model generation are the robustness of model prediction and the validity of the generated model. So
comparing the results of several types of descriptors through multiple machine learning methods along
with cross validating the generated models and testing the data not included in the training set (i.e., the
external validation) is an important step for QSAR experiments. The QSAR modeling problems can be
related to model prediction and optimization whether on descriptors selection or model generation. Many
optimization algorithms have been proposed and employed in computational modeling of drug design.
The GA, PSO, ACO, ANN, and variations of them are the most applied algorithms in QSAR studies
among which ANN and GA have a strong historical background in pharmaceutical drug design. The
ANN as an inspiration of human brain functionality is mostly utilized in model predictions which take
effects from many parameters such as feature selection, network topology design, network optimization
and validation. From the recent QSAR studies, it can also be deduced that hybrid and ensemble versions
of machine learning algorithms as well as graph based machine learning technologies had promising
results in comparison with the original artificial intelligence algorithms. However, using the combination of the methods, whether it is in hybrid or ensemble mode, will need a higher computation power
to make it possible for huge data sets of pharmaceutical drug industry to be processed. The improved
computational algorithms with high efficiency and performance may aid to farther the success rate of
QSAR based drug development. The last but not the least, the QSAR models can be improved by utilizing advanced hardware and computational resources.
28
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
CONCLUSION
Pharmaceutical companies always follow the cost effectiveness strategy for drug design and development. Undoubtedly, computational (in silico) techniques have paved the way by streamlining a
number of processes for today’s lead generation and identification needs. In this framework, QSAR
modeling has been proved as one of the important and viable computational tools. In its widest
concept, it includes finding the systematic structural differences between compounds in terms of
molecular descriptors which lead to differences in corresponding biological activities. Moreover,
this technique provides synthetic guidance for rational drug design prior to synthesis. In this way,
the molecules possessing suitable features can be identified as hits. Over the last 50 years, QSAR
studies still play an important role in identification of new chemical entities and also help to find
out the borders of distinct properties of compounds for better activity. The success of QSAR models is greatly affected by accuracy of biological data obtained from experimental assays. However,
gathering experimental data is not always error-free. It is important to keep in mind that, no QSAR
model replaces the experimental studies and the real validation strategy is to synthesize and evaluate the new analogs. It should be emphasized that although trial-and-error factor or serendipity in
drug development cannot be ruled out completely, nevertheless, QSAR and other computational
approaches reduce the number of compounds needed to be synthesized and tested by identifying
the most promising candidates. Although, the introduced new chemical entities do not necessarily
enter the clinical trials because of the complexity of biological processes influenced by several
factors such as pharmacokinetics, and lots of evaluation processes are required before reaching the
market, however, the QSAR methods increase the success rate of drug development projects. The
prediction of the toxicities for the chemical agents is a more complicated issue relative to that of
the pharmacological effects due to limited toxicity data and related resources. However, improved
in vitro high throughput toxicity screening test and “omics” technologies provides a roadmap for
advances in QSAR-aided toxicity prediction.
REFERENCES
Abbasi, E., Ghatee, M., & Shiri, M. E. (2013). FRAN and RBF-PSO as two components of a hyper
framework to recognize protein folds. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 43(9), 1182–1191.
doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.05.017 PMID:23930812
Adhikari, N., Maiti, M. K., & Jha, T. (2010). Predictive comparative QSAR modelling of (phenylpiperazinyl-alkyl) oxindoles as selective 5-HT1A antagonists by stepwise regression, PCRA, FA-MLR
and PLS techniques. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 45(3), 1119–1127. doi:10.1016/j.
ejmech.2009.12.011 PMID:20053486
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
29

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Afantitis, A., Melagraki, G., Sarimveis, H., Koutentis, P. A., Markopoulos, J., & Igglessi-Markopoulou, O.
(2006). A novel simple QSAR model for the prediction of anti-HIV activity using multiple linear regression analysis. Molecular Diversity, 10(3), 405–414. doi:10.1007/s11030-005-9012-2 PMID:16896545
Aguiar-Pulido, V., Gestal, M., Cruz-Monteagudo, M., Rabunal, J. R., Dorado, J., & Munteanu, C. R.
(2013). Evolutionary computation and QSAR research. Current Compuer Aided Drug Design, 9(2),
206–225. doi:10.2174/1573409911309020006 PMID:23700999
Akamatsu, M. (2002). Current state and perspectives of 3D-QSAR. Current Topics in Medicinal Chem-
istry, 2(12), 1381–1394. doi:10.2174/1568026023392887 PMID:12470286
Andrade, C. H., Pasqualoto, K. F., Ferreira, E. I., & Hopfinger, A. J. (2010). 4D-QSAR: Perspectives
in drug design. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 15(5), 3281–3294. doi:10.3390/molecules15053281
PMID:20657478
Angulo, J. C., & Antolin, J. (2007). Atomic quantum similarity indices in position and momentum spaces.
The Journal of Chemical Physics, 126(4), 044106. doi:10.1063/1.2429064 PMID:17286461
Bababadani, B. M., & Mousavi, M. (2013). Gravitational search algorithm: A new feature selection
method for QSAR study of anticancer potency of imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine deravatives. Chemometrics
and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 122, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.12.002
Bagheri, S., Omidikia, N., & Kompany-Zareh, M. (2013). Unsupervised selection of inforamtive descriptors in QSAR study of anti-HIV activities of HEPT derivatives. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory
Systems, 128, 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.08.004
Barker, M., & Rayens, W. (2003). Partial least squares for descrimination. Journal of Chemometrics,
17(3), 166–173. doi:10.1002/cem.785
Baroni, M., Costantino, G., Cruciani, G., Riganelli, D., Valigi, R., & Clementi, S. (1993). Generating optimal linear PLS estimations (GOLPE): An advanced chemometric tool for handling 3D-QSAR
problems. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 12(1), 9–20. doi:10.1002/qsar.19930120103
Baskin, I. I., Ait, A. O., Halberstam, N. M., Palyulin, V. A., & Zefirov, N. S. (2002). An approach to the
interpretation of backpropagation neural network models in QSAR studies. SAR and QSAR in Environ-
mental Research, 13(1), 35–41. doi:10.1080/10629360290002073 PMID:12074390
Baskin, I. I., & Zhokhova, N. I. (2013). The continuous molecular fields approach to building 3D-QSAR
models. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 27(5), 427–442. doi:10.1007/s10822-013-9656-
4 PMID:23719959
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (2000). Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour. Nature, 406(6791), 39–42. doi:10.1038/35017500 PMID:10894532
Butkiewicz, M., Lowe, E. W. Jr, Mueller, R., Mendenhall, J. L., Teixeira, P. L., Weaver, C. D., & Meiler,
J. (2013). Benchmarking ligand-based virtual High-Throughput Screening with the PubChem database.
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 18(1), 735–756. doi:10.3390/molecules18010735 PMID:23299552
30
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Chen, S. A., Ou, Y. Y., Lee, T. Y., & Gromiha, M. M. (2011). Prediction of transporter targets using efficient RBF networks with PSSM profiles and biochemical properties. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England),
27(15), 2062–2067. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr340 PMID:21653515
Chen, Y., Xu, J., Yang, B., Zhao, Y., & He, W. (2012). A novel method for prediction of protein interaction
sites based on integrated RBF neural networks. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 42(4), 402–407.
doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.12.007 PMID:22226645
Cheng, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, C. (2011). QSAR models for phosphoramidate prodrugs of 2’-methylcytidine as inhibitors of hepatitis C virus based on PSO boosting. Chemical Biology & Drug Design,
78(6), 948–959. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01236.x PMID:21895985
Chupakhin, V., Marcou, G., Baskin, I., Varnek, A., & Rognan, D. (2013). Predicting ligand binding
modes from neural networks trained on protein-ligand interaction fingerprints. Journal of Chemical
Information and Modeling, 53(4), 763–772. doi:10.1021/ci300200r PMID:23480697
Craig, E. A., Wang, N. C., & Zhao, Q. J. (2013). Using quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling to quantitatively predict the developmental toxicity of halogenated azole compounds. Journal of
Applied Toxicology. doi:10.1002/jat.2940 PMID:24122872
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988). Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society,
110(18), 5959–5967. doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 PMID:22148765
Cruciani, G. (Ed.). (2006). Molecular interaction fields. Application in drug discovery and ADME pre-
diction (Vol. 27). Darmstadt: WILEY-VCH.
Damale, M. G., Harke, S. N., Kalam Khan, F. A., Shinde, D. B., & Sangshetti, J. N. (2014). Recent
advances in multidimensional QSAR (4D-6D): A critical review. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry,
14(1), 35–55. doi:10.2174/13895575113136660104 PMID:24195665
Dastmalchi, S., Hamzeh-Mivehroud, M., & Asadpour-Zeynali, K. (2012). Comparison of different 2D
and 3D-QSAR methods on activity prediction of histamine H3 receptor antagonists. Iranian Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research, 11(1), 97–108. PMID:25317190
Dastmalchi, S., Hamzeh-Mivehroud, M., Ghafourian, T., & Hamzeiy, H. (2008). Molecular modeling
of histamine H3 receptor and QSAR studies on arylbenzofuran derived H3 antagonists. Journal of
Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 26(5), 834–844. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.05.002 PMID:17561422
Datar, P. A., Khedkar, S. A., Malde, A. K., & Coutinho, E. C. (2006). Comparative residue interaction
analysis (CoRIA): A 3D-QSAR approach to explore the binding contributions of active site residues
with ligands. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 20(6), 343–360. doi:10.1007/s10822-006-
9051-5 PMID:17009094
de Melo, E. B., & Ferreira, M. M. (2012). Four-dimensional structure-activity relationship model to
predict HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibition using LQTA-QSAR methodology. Journal of Chemical
Information and Modeling, 52(7), 1722–1732. doi:10.1021/ci300039a PMID:22657398
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
31

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Dearden, J. C., Cronin, M. T., & Kaiser, K. L. (2009). How not to develop a quantitative structureactivity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR). SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research,
20(3-4), 241–266. doi:10.1080/10629360902949567 PMID:19544191
Dobler, M., Lill, M. A., & Vedani, A. (2003). From crystal structures and their analysis to the in
silico prediction of toxic phenomena1. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 86(5), 1554–1568. doi:10.1002/
hlca.200390134
Doo Ho, C., Sung Kwang, L., Bum Tae, K., & Kyoung Tai, N. (2001). Quantitative structure-activity
relationship (QSAR) study of new fluorovinyloxyacetamides. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society,
22(4), 388–394.
Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996). Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating
agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 26(1), 29–41. doi:10.1109/3477.484436
PMID:18263004
Du, H., Wang, J., Hu, Z., & Yao, X. (2008). Quantitative structure-retention relationship study of the
constituents of saffron aroma in SPME-GC-MS based on the projection pursuit regression method.
Talanta, 77(1), 360–365. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2008.06.038 PMID:18804646
Du, H., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Yao, X., & Hu, Z. (2008). Novel approaches to predict the retention
of histidine-containing peptides in immobilized metal-affinity chromatography. Proteomics, 8(11),
2185–2195. doi:10.1002/pmic.200700788 PMID:18446801
Du, Q. S., Huang, R. B., Wei, Y. T., Pang, Z. W., Du, L. Q., & Chou, K. C. (2009). Fragment-based
quantitative structure-activity relationship (FB-QSAR) for fragment-based drug design. Journal of
Computational Chemistry, 30(2), 295–304. doi:10.1002/jcc.21056 PMID:18613071
Ducki, S., Mackenzie, G., Lawrence, N. J., & Snyder, J. P. (2005). Quantitative structure-activity
relationship (5D-QSAR) study of combretastatin-like analogues as inhibitors of tubulin assembly.
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 48(2), 457–465. doi:10.1021/jm049444m PMID:15658859
Dudek, A. Z., Arodz, T., & Galvez, J. (2006). Computational methods in developing quantitative
structure-activity relationships (QSAR): A review. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput
Screening, 9(3), 213–228. doi:10.2174/138620706776055539 PMID:16533155
Duran, A., Zamora, I., & Pastor, M. (2009). Suitability of GRIND-based principal properties for the
description of molecular similarity and ligand-based virtual screening. Journal of Chemical Informa-
tion and Modeling, 49(9), 2129–2138. doi:10.1021/ci900228x PMID:19728739
Durant, G. J., Emmett, J. C., Ganellin, C. R., Miles, P. D., Parsons, M. E., Prain, H. D., & White, G.
R. (1977). Cyanoguanidine-thiourea equivalence in the development of the histamine H2-receptor
antagonist, cimetidine. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 20(7), 901–906. doi:10.1021/jm00217a007
PMID:17751
Dury, L., Latour, T., Leherte, L., Barberis, F., & Vercauteren, D. P. (2001). A new graph descriptor
for molecules containing cycles. Application as screening criterion for searching molecular structures
within large databases of organic compounds. J Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sci-
ences, 41(6), 1437–1445. PMID:11749566
32
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Dutt, R., & Madan, A. K. (2012). Predicting biological activity: Computational approach using novel distance based molecular descriptors. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 42(10), 1026–1041. doi:10.1016/j.
compbiomed.2012.08.006 PMID:22964398
El Kerdawy, A., Gussregen, S., Matter, H., Hennemann, M., & Clark, T. (2013). Quantum mechanicsbased properties for 3D-QSAR. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(6), 1486–1502.
doi:10.1021/ci400181b PMID:23692495
Esposito Vinzi, V. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications.
Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
Estrada, E., & Molina, E. (2001). Novel local (fragment-based) topological molecular descriptors for QSpr/
QSAR and molecular design. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 20(1), 54–64. doi:10.1016/
S1093-3263(01)00100-0 PMID:11760003
Farahani, M. R. (2013). Third-connectivity and third-sum-connectivity indices of circumcoronene series
of benzenoid H(k). Acta Chimica Slovenica, 60(1), 198–202. PMID:23841353
Fernandez, M., Caballero, J., Fernandez, L., & Sarai, A. (2011). Genetic algorithm optimization in drug
design QSAR: Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks (BRGNN) and genetic algorithm-optimized
support vectors machines (GA-SVM). Molecular Diversity, 15(1), 269–289. doi:10.1007/s11030-0109234-9 PMID:20306130
Fernandez-Blanco, E., Aguiar-Pulido, V., Munteanu, C. R., & Dorado, J. (2013). Random Forest classification based on star graph topological indices for antioxidant proteins. Journal of Theoretical Biology,
317, 331–337. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.10.006 PMID:23116665
Fernandez-Lozano, C., Gestal, M., Pedreira-Souto, N., Postelnicu, L., Dorado, J., & Munteanu, C. R.
(2013). Kernel-based feature selection techniques for transport proteins based on star graph topological
indices. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 13(14), 1681–1691. doi:10.2174/1568026611313999
0119 PMID:23889046
Ferraty, F. r., & Romain, Y. (2011). The Oxford handbook of functional data analysis. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Ghosh, P., & Bagchi, M. C. (2009). QSAR modeling for quinoxaline derivatives using genetic algorithm
and simulated annealing based feature selection. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 16(30), 4032–4048.
doi:10.2174/092986709789352303 PMID:19747124
Gohlke, H., & Klebe, G. (2002). DrugScore meets CoMFA: Adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein. Journal of
Medicinal Chemistry, 45(19), 4153–4170. doi:10.1021/jm020808p PMID:12213058
Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2002). Beware of q2! Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 20(4),
269–276. doi:10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1 PMID:11858635
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Reading,
MA: Addison Welsey.
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
33

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Gonzalez, M. P., Teran, C., Saiz-Urra, L., & Teijeira, M. (2008). Variable Selection Methods in QSAR: An
overview. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 8(18), 1606–1627. doi:10.2174/156802608786786552
PMID:19075770
Goodarzi, M., & Freitas, M. P. (2010). MIA-QSAR coupled to principal component analysis-adaptive
neuro-fuzzy inference systems (PCA-ANFIS) for the modeling of the anti-HIV reverse transcriptase activities of TIBO derivatives. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 45(4), 1352–1358. doi:10.1016/j.
ejmech.2009.12.028 PMID:20060625
Goodarzi, M., Jensen, R., & Vander Heyden, Y. (2012). QSRR modeling for diverse drugs using different feature selection methods coupled with linear and nonlinear regressions. Journal of Chroma-
tography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 910, 84–94. doi:10.1016/j.
jchromb.2012.01.012 PMID:22341354
Goodarzi, M., Saeys, W., Araujo, M. C., Galvao, R. K., & Vander Heyden, Y. (2013). Binary classification of chalcone derivatives with LDA or KNN based on their antileishmanial activity and molecular
descriptors selected using the Successive Projections Algorithm feature-selection technique. European
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.019 PMID:24090733
Goodarzi, M., Saeys, W., Deeb, O., Pieters, S., & Vander Heyden, Y. (2013). Particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm as feature selection techniques for the QSAR modeling of imidazo[1,5-a]
pyrido[3,2-e]pyrazines, inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 10A. Chemical Biology & Drug Design, 82(6),
685–696. doi:10.1111/cbdd.12196 PMID:23906083
Goodford, P. J. (1985). A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites
on biologically important macromolecules. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 28(7), 849–857. doi:10.1021/
jm00145a002 PMID:3892003
Goodsell, D. S. (2009). Computational docking of biomolecular complexes with AutoDock. Cold Spring
Harbor Protocols, 2009(5). doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5200
Goodsell, D. S., Morris, G. M., & Olson, A. J. (1996). Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of AutoDock. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 9(1), 1–5. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10991352(199601)9:1<1::AID-JMR241>3.0.CO;2-6 PMID:8723313
Gozalbes, R., Doucet, J. P., & Derouin, F. (2002). Application of topological descriptors in QSAR
and drug design: History and new trends. Current Drug Targets. Infectious Disorders, 2(1), 93–102.
doi:10.2174/1568005024605909 PMID:12462157
Gramatica, P. (2007). Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external. QSAR & Combinato-
rial Science, 26(5), 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151
Gussregen, S., Matter, H., Hessler, G., Muller, M., Schmidt, F., & Clark, T. (2012). 3D-QSAR based on
quantum-chemical molecular fields: Toward an improved description of halogen interactions. Journal
of Chemical Information and Modeling, 52(9), 2441–2453. doi:10.1021/ci300253z PMID:22917472
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002). Gene selection for cancer classification using
support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46(1/3), 389–422. doi:10.1023/A:1012487302797
34
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use

An Introduction to the Basic Concepts in QSAR-Aided Drug Design
Hall, L. H., & Kier, L. B. (1991). The molecular connectivity chi indexes and kappa shape indexes
in structure-property modeling. In K. B. Lipkowitz & D. B. Boyd (Eds.), Reviews in computational
chemistry (pp. 367–422). New York: VCH. doi:10.1002/9780470125793.ch9
Hall, L. H., & Kier, L. B. (2001). Issues in representation of molecular structure the development
of molecular connectivity. Journal of Molecular Graphics & Modelling, 20(1), 4–18. doi:10.1016/
S1093-3263(01)00097-3 PMID:11760002
Hammett, L. P. (1937). The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds: Benzene
derivatives. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 59(1), 96–103. doi:10.1021/ja01280a022
Hansch, C., Maloney, P. P., Fujita, T., & Muir, R. M. (1962). Correlation of biological activity of
phenoxyacetic acids with hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature, 194(4824),
178–180. doi:10.1038/194178b0
Hardin, C. T., & Rouchka, E. C. (2005). DNA motif detection using particle swarm optimization and
expectation-maximization. IEEE Symposium on Swarm Intelligence, 2005, 181-184. doi:10.1109/
SIS.2005.1501620
He, Y., Chen, D., & Zhao, W. (2006). Ensemble classifier syste based on ant colony algorithm and
its application in chemical pattern classification. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems,
80(1), 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.06.003
Hemmateenejad, B., Yousefinejad, S., & Mehdipour, A. R. (2011). Novel amino acids indices based
on quantum topological molecular similarity and their application to QSAR study of peptides. Amino
Acids, 40(4), 1169–1183. doi:10.1007/s00726-010-0741-x PMID:20852906
Higo, J. I., & GÅ, N. (. (1989). Algorithm for rapid calculation of excluded volume of large molecules. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 10(3), 376–379. doi:10.1002/jcc.540100311
Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in natrual and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Press.
Hopfinger, A. J., Wang, S., Tokarski, J. S., Jin, B., Albuquerque, M., Madhav, P. J., & Duraiswami,
C. (1997). Construction of 3D-QSAR models using the 4D-QSAR analysis formalism. Journal of
the American Chemical Society, 119(43), 10509–10524. doi:10.1021/ja9718937
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417-441, 498-520.
Ivanciuc, O. (1999). The neural network MolNet prediction of alkane enthalpies. Analytica Chimica
Acta, 384(3), 271–284. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00777-6
Ivanciuc, O. (2003). Graph theory in chemistry. In J. Gasteiger (Ed.), Handbook of cheminformatics
(Vol. 1, pp. 103–138). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/9783527618279.ch6
Ivanciuc, O. (2013). Chemical graphs, molecular matrices and topological indices in cheminformatics and quantitative structure-activity relationships. Current Computer-aided Drug Design, 9(2),
153–163. doi:10.2174/1573409911309020002 PMID:23701000
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
35
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
