Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5587_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Figure 10. Plots between experimental and calculated toxicity of CPs against (A) D. magna, (B) B. rerio,
and (C) Bacillus
(Reprinted with permission from Padmanabhan et al., 2006c. Copyright © 2006, American Chemical Society).
92.8% variation data (r
2
= 0.878) having correlation coefficient value (r) of 0.964 (see Figure 10(B))
cv
whereas in case against Bacillus this model was able to describe maximum variation in data (91.9%)
2
along with r
value of 0.863 and r value of 0.959 (see Figure 10(C).
cv
Therefore, this result implied that group philicity along with electrophilicity are very much effective in representing the toxicity of CPs against D. magna, B. rerio, and Bacillus. It in turn showed the
importance of these reactivity indices as effective descriptors in ecotoxicological studies.
156
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
6. EFFECT OF CHOSEN FUNCTIONALS IN BUILDING GLOBAL
REACTIVITY DESCRIPTORS BASED QSAR/QSPR/QSTR MODELS
Vijayaraj et al. (2009) assessed the effect of studied functionals on the ionization potential (IP) and the
electron affinity (EA) of the systems, which were generally used to compute the CDFT based reactivity
descriptors. Therefore, the dependence of IP and EA on the chosen functionals would raise questions
about the level of theory chosen to construct QSAR, QSPR and QSTR based on the reactivity descriptors. In other words, the predictive power of a regression model might depend on the chosen level of
theory. In order to explore the efficacy of various density functionals along with different basis sets in
calculating IP and EA, hence, to benchmark, systematic computations were performed considering a
series of chlorinated benzenes (CBs). Some common functionals of pure, GGA, hybrid, and meta and
hybrid meta GGA types were employed. It was found that a good agreement between computed and
experimental IP and EA values could be attained with the increase in the rigor of the level of computation. The prediction of IP and EA of CBs, computed using both Koopmans’ approximation and ΔSCF
method, was most accurately made by the use of M05-2X functional. Further, in between Koopmans’
approximation and ΔSCF method, IP and EA computed by ΔSCF method matched more closely with
the corresponding experimental values than that by the Koopmans’ approximation.
Now, using those descriptors computed at different levels of theory, different regression models were
designed to predict the toxicity of nine CBs against Poecilia reticulata. Different descriptors along with
different approximations were included. It was found that although the computation of global reactivity descriptors at different levels and/or different basis sets yielded considerably different values, the
mean deviation of a certain property among all the studied systems with respect to the chosen method/
basis set was comparable. It meant that with the change in studied method and/or basis set, the values of
computed global reactivity descriptors would be changed, however, the magnitude of the difference in
between the systems were more or less same in all the methods. This finding was important in this sense
that the efficacy of a regression model and hence the correlation coefficient would not alter significantly
with the change in level of theory. For example, in spite of good agreement with the experimental IP
and EA using ΔSCF method, it did not improve the correlation coefficient with respect to that obtained
using Koopmans’ theorem. In general, to construct a QSAR/QSPR/QSTR model, one has to consider
a data set containing a large number of systems. Therefore, it can be concluded that if one considers
computationally a very cheap level of theory to model QSAR/QSPR/QSTR, it can be possible to get
reliable results similar to the one constructed from the results of a high level of theory, which will in
deed save a lot of computational time.
7. CONCLUSION
In order to better understand the variation of property, activity and toxicity with the structural change
of a molecular motif, the Quantitative-Structure-(Property/Activity/Toxicity) Relationship models are
widely applied. Various types of methods and models were employed to construct effective regression
equations. Both, global and local reactivity descriptors based on Conceptual Density Functional Theory
are found to be very effective indices in order to predict biological activity or property or toxicity
of a set of systems. We have specially drawn attention on the efficacy of the regression models built
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
157
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
based on the different combinations of the parameters viz., electrophilicity index, net electrophilicity index, group philicity along with their local variants, atomic charge, number of carbon or Cl or
non-hydrogenic atoms, atomic number, chemical potential, LUMO energy and Hartree-Fock energy
in predicting the toxicity of various aliphatic compounds, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, chloroanilines,
phenol, nitrobenzene, benzonitrile-derivatives, halogen, sulfur and chlorinated aromatic compounds,
testosterone, estrogen derivatives, and different alkali, alkaline-earth, transition-metal, arsenic ions
as well. Although individual descriptors were found to vary with the change in level of theory and /or
basis set, the efficacy of the overall QSAR/QSPR/QSTR models depend hardly on the level of theory.
Therefore, very low level of theory can also yield reliable results.
Therefore, the reactivity descriptors within the purview of conceptual DFT will be a good choice in
predicting the desired properties of a set of systems.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to Professor Kunal Roy for inviting us to contribute this chapter. PKC would like to thank
DST, New Delhi for the J. C. Bose National Fellowship. SP thanks CSIR, New Delhi for his fellowship.
REFERENCES
Aboye, T. L., Sobhia, M. E., & Bharatam, P. V. (2004). 3D-QSAR studies of pyruvate dehydrogenase
kinase inhibitors based on a divide and conquer strategy. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 12(10),
2709–2715. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.03.019 PMID:15110852
Abraham, M. H. (1994). New solute descriptors for linear free energy relationships and quantitative
structure-activity relationships. In Quantitative treatments of solute/solvent interactions. Elsevier.
Abraham, M. H., Chadha, H. S., Dixon, J. P., Rafols, C., & Treiner, C. (1995). Hydrogen bonding. Part
40. Factors that influence the distribution of solutes between water and sodium dodecylsulfate micelles.
Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions, 2(5), 887–894. doi:10.1039/p29950000887
Adhikari, N., Halder, A. K., Mondal, C., & Jha, T. (2013). Exploring structural requirements of aurone
derivatives as antimalarials by validated DFT-based QSAR, HQSAR, and COMFA–COMSIA approach.
Medicinal Chemistry Research, 22(12), 6029–6045. doi:10.1007/s00044-013-0590-8
Adhikari, N., Halder, A. K., Mondal, C., & Jha, T. (2014). Structural findings of quinolone carboxylic
acids in cytotoxic, antiviral, and anti-HIV-1 integrase activity through validated comparative molecular
modeling studies. Medicinal Chemistry Research, 23(6), 3096–3127. doi:10.1007/s00044-013-0897-5
Akamatsu, M. (2002). Current state and perspectives of 3D-QSAR. Current Topics in Medicinal Chem-
istry, 12(12), 1381–1394. doi:10.2174/1568026023392887 PMID:12470286
Amin, E. A., & Welsh, W. J. (2006). Highly predictive CoMFA and CoMSIA models for two series
of stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) inhibitors elucidate S1‘ and S1−S2‘ binding modes. Journal of Chemical
Information and Modeling, 46(4), 1775–1783. doi:10.1021/ci060089d PMID:16859309
158
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Arning, J., Stolte, S., Böschen, A., Stock, F., Pitner, W.-R., & Welz-Biermann, U. etal. (2008). Qualitative and quantitative structure activity relationships for the inhibitory effects of cationic head groups,
functionalised side chains and anions of ionic liquids on acetylcholinesterase. Green Chemistry, 10(1),
47–58. doi:10.1039/b712109a
Avery, M. A., Alvim-Gaston, M., Rodrigues, C. R., Barreiro, E. J., Cohen, F. E., Sabnis, Y. A., & Woolfrey,
J. R. (2002). Structure−activity relationships of the antimalarial agent artemisinin. 6. The development
of predictive in vitro potency models using CoMFA and HQSAR methodologies. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry, 45(2), 292–303. doi:10.1021/jm0100234 PMID:11784134
Ayers, P. W., & Levy, M. (2000). Perspective on “Density functional approach to the frontier-electron
theory of chemical reactivity”. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 103(3-4), 353–360. doi:10.1007/
s002149900093
Ayers, P. W., & Parr, R. G. (2000). Variational principles for describing chemical reactions: The Fukui
function and chemical hardness revisited. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122(9), 2010–2018.
doi:10.1021/ja9924039
Bajot, F. (2010). The use of QSAR and computational methods in drug design. In Recent advances in
QSAR studies (pp. 261–282). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_9
Balaban, A. T. (1997). From chemical topology to 3D geometry. Journal of Chemical Information and
Computer Sciences, 37(4), 645–650. doi:10.1021/ci960168x
Balaban, A. T. (1998). Topological and stereochemical molecular descriptors for databases useful in
QSAR, similarity/dissimilarity and drug design. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 8(1-2),
1–21. doi:10.1080/10629369808033259
Bao, Y., Huang, Q., Li, Y., Li, N., He, T., & Feng, C. (2012). Prediction of nitrobenzene toxicity to the
algae (Scenedesmus obliguus) by quantitative structure–toxicity relationship (QSTR) models with quantum chemical descriptors. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 33(1), 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.
etap.2011.09.003 PMID:22088683
Bearden, A. P., & Schultz, T. W. (1998). Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxic-
ity based on mechanism of action. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 9(3-4), 127–153.
doi:10.1080/10629369808039153 PMID:9933957
Berkowitz, M., & Parr, R. G. (1988). Molecular hardness and softness, local hardness and softness,
hardness and softness kernels, and relations among these quantities. The Journal of Chemical Physics,
88(4), 2554–2557. doi:10.1063/1.454034
Bhongade, B. A., & Gadad, A. K. (2004). 3D-QSAR CoMFA/CoMSIA studies on urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) inhibitors: A strategic design in novel anticancer agents. Bioorganic & Medicinal
Chemistry, 12(10), 2797–2805. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2004.02.019 PMID:15110861
Blaney, J., & Hansch, C. (1990). Application of molecular graphics to the analysis of macromolecular
structure. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, 4, 459–496.
Blankley, C. J. (1996). Structure property correlations in drug research. Academic Press.
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
159
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Bohari, M. H., Srivastava, H. K., & Sastry, G. N. (2011). Analogue-based approaches in anti-cancer
compound modelling: The relevance of QSAR models. Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 1(1),
1–12. doi:10.1186/2191-2858-1-3 PMID:22373294
Bonaccorsi, R., Scrocco, E., & Tomasi, J. (1970). Molecular SCF calculations for the ground state of
some three-membered ring molecules: (CH
N
. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 52(10), 5270–5284. doi:10.1063/1.1672775
2CH2
, (CH2)2NH, (CH2)NH
2)3
+
, (CH2)2O, (CH2)2S, (CH)2CH2, and
2
Buttingsrud, B., Alsberg, B. K., & Åstrand, P.-O. (2007a). An investigation of descriptors based on
the critical points in the electron density by building quantitative structure–property relationships for
proton chemical shifts. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM, 810(1-3), 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.
theochem.2007.01.031
Buttingsrud, B., Alsberg, B. K., & Åstrand, P.-O. (2007b). Quantitative prediction of the absorption
maxima of azobenzene dyes from bond lengths and critical points in the electron density. Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics, 9, 2226–2233. doi:10.1039/b617470a PMID:17487319
Buttingsrud, B., Alsberg, B. K., & Åstrand, P.-O. (2007c). Validation of critical points in the electron
density as descriptors by building quantitative structure-property relationships for the atomic polar tensor. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 28(13), 2130–2139. doi:10.1002/jcc.20666 PMID:17464968
Camenisch, G., Folkers, G., & van de Waterbeemd, H. (1998). Shapes of membrane permeabilitylipophilicity curves: Extension of theoretical models with an aqueous pore pathway. European Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(4), 321–329. doi:10.1016/S0928-0987(98)00033-5
Chakraborty, A., Duley, S., Giri, S., & Chattaraj, P. K. (2012). An understanding of the origin of
chemical reactivity from a conceptual DFT approach. In J. Wiley (Ed.), A matter of density, exploring the electron density concept in the chemical, biological, and materials sciences. Academic Press.
doi:10.1002/9781118431740.ch7
Chakraborty, A., Pan, S., & Chattaraj, P. K. (2013). Biological activity and toxicity: A conceptual DFT
approach. Structure and Bonding, 150, 143–179. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32750-6_5
Chamorro, E., Chattaraj, P. K., & Fuentealba, P. (2003). Variation of the electrophilicity index along
the reaction path. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 107(36), 7068–7072. doi:10.1021/jp035435y
Chattaraj, P. K. (1992). Electronegativity and hardness: A density functional treatment. Journal of the
Indian Chemical Society, 69, 173–183.
Chattaraj, P. K. (1996). The maximum hardness principle: An overview. Proceedings of the Indian
National Science Academy - Part A, 62, 513–531.
Chattaraj, P. K. (Ed.). (2009). Chemical reactivity theory: A density functional view. Taylor and Francis/
CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781420065442
Chattaraj, P. K., Arun Murthy, T. V. S., Giri, S., & Roy, D. R. (2007). A connection between softness
and magnetizability. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM, 813(1-3), 63–65. doi:10.1016/j.
theochem.2007.02.035
160
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Chattaraj, P. K., Chakraborty, A., & Giri, S. (2009). Net electrophilicity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 113(37), 10068–10074. doi:10.1021/jp904674x PMID:19702288
Chattaraj, P. K., Fuentealba, P., Gomez, B., & Contreras, R. (2000). Woodward-Hoffmann rule in the
light of the principles of maximum hardness and minimum polarizability: DFT and ab initio SCF studies.
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122(2), 348–351. doi:10.1021/ja992337a
Chattaraj, P. K., Fuentealba, P., Jaque, P., & Toro-Labbé, A. (1999). Validity of the minimum polarizability principle in molecular vibrations and internal rotations: An ab initio SCF study. The Journal of
Physical Chemistry A, 103(46), 9307–9312. doi:10.1021/jp9918656
Chattaraj, P. K., & Giri, S. (2009). Electrophilicity index within a conceptual DFT framework. Annual
Reports on the Progress of Chemistry Section C, 105, 13–39. doi:10.1039/b802832j
Chattaraj, P. K., Giri, S., & Duley, S. (2011). Update 2 of: Electrophilicity index. Chemical Reviews,
111(2), PR43–PR75. doi:10.1021/cr100149p PMID:21306180
Chattaraj, P. K., Liu, G. H., & Parr, R. G. (1995). The maximum hardness principle in the GyftopoulosHatsopoulos three-level model for an atomic or molecular species and its positive and negative ions.
Chemical Physics Letters, 237(1-2), 171–176. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(95)00280-H
Chattaraj, P. K., Maiti, B., & Sarkar, U. (2003). Philicity: A unified treatment of chemical reactivity and
selectivity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 107(25), 4973–4975. doi:10.1021/jp034707u
Chattaraj, P. K., & Poddar, A. (1998). A density functional treatment of chemical reactivity and the associated electronic structure principles in the excited electronic states. The Journal of Physical Chemistry
A, 102(48), 9944–9948. doi:10.1021/jp982734s
Chattaraj, P. K., & Roy, D. R. (2007). Update 1 of: Electrophilicity index. Chemical Reviews, 107(9),
PR46–PR74. doi:10.1021/cr078014b PMID:21306180
Chattaraj, P. K., Roy, D. R., Geerlings, P., & Torrent-Sucarrat, M. (2007). Local hardness: A critical
account. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 118(5-6), 923–930. doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0373-8
Chattaraj, P. K., Roy, D. R., Giri, S., Mukherjee, S., Subramanian, V., & Parthasarathi, R. etal. (2007).
An atom counting and electrophilicity based QSTR approach. Journal of Chemical Sciences, 119(5),
475–488. doi:10.1007/s12039-007-0061-1
Chattaraj, P. K., Sarkar, U., & Roy, D. R. (2006). Electrophilicity index. Chemical Reviews, 106(6),
2065–2091. doi:10.1021/cr040109f PMID:16771443
Chattaraj, P. K., & Sengupta, S. (1996). Popular electronic structure principles in a dynamical context.
Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100(40), 16126–16130. doi:10.1021/jp961096f
Chattaraj, P. K., & Sengupta, S. (1997). Dynamics of chemical reactivity indices for a many-electron
system in its ground and excited states. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 101(42), 7893–7900.
doi:10.1021/jp971408u
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
161
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Chaudry, U. A., & Popelier, P. L. A. (2003). Ester hydrolysis rate constant prediction from quantum
topological molecular similarity descriptors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 107(22), 4578–4582.
doi:10.1021/jp034272a
Chaudry, U. A., & Popelier, P. L. A. (2004). Estimation of pKa using quantum topological molecular
similarity descriptors: application to carboxylic acids, anilines and phenols. The Journal of Organic
Chemistry, 69(2), 233–241. doi:10.1021/jo0347415 PMID:14725434
Consonni, V., Todeschini, R., & Pavan, M. (2002). Structure/response correlations and similarity/diversity
analysis by GETAWAY descriptors. Part 1. Theory of the novel 3D molecular descriptors. Journal of
Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 42(3), 682–692. doi:10.1021/ci015504a PMID:12086530
Counsell, R. E., Klimstra, P. D., & Colton, F. B. (1962). Anabolic agents. Derivatives of 5α-Androst-1ene. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 27(1), 248–253. doi:10.1021/jo01048a060
Cramer, R. D. III, & Milne, M. (1979). Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society. Computer
Chemistry Section, 44.
Cramer, R. D. III, Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988). Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society,
110(18), 5959–5967. doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 PMID:22148765
Cronin, M. T. D., Gregory, B. W., & Schultz, T. W. (1998). Quantitative structure-activity analyses of
nitrobenzene toxicity to tetrahymena pyriformis. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 11(8), 902–908.
doi:10.1021/tx970166m PMID:9705752
Cronin, M. T. D., & Schultz, T. W. (1996). Structure-toxicity relationships for phenols to Tetrahymena
pyriformis. Chemosphere, 32(8), 1453–1468. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(96)00054-9 PMID:8653384
Cronin, M. T. D., & Schultz, T. W. (1998). Structure–toxicity relationships for three mechanisms of action of toxicity to vibrio fischeri. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 39(1), 65–69. doi:10.1006/
eesa.1997.1618 PMID:9515077
Cruciani, G., Pastor, M., & Guba, W. (2000). VolSurf: A new tool for the pharmacokinetic optimization
of lead compounds. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11, S29–S39. doi:10.1016/S09280987(00)00162-7 PMID:11033425
Dalgarno, A. (1962). Atomic polarizabilities and shielding factors. Advances in Physics, 11(44), 281–315.
doi:10.1080/00018736200101302
Damme, S. V., & Bultinck, P. (2010). 3D QSAR based on conceptual DFT molecular fields: Antituberculotic activity. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM, 943(1-3), 83–89. doi:10.1016/j.
theochem.2009.10.031
de Melo, E. B., & Ferreira, M. M. C. (2009). Multivariate QSAR study of 4,5-dihydroxypyrimidine carboxamides as HIV-1 integrase inhibitors European. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 44(9), 3577–3583.
doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.03.001 PMID:19327872
162
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Debnath, A. K., Shusterman, A. J., Lopez de Compadre, R. L., & Hasch, C. (1994). The importance of
the hydrophobic interaction in the mutagenicity of organic compounds. Mutation Research/Fundamental
and Molecular Mechanisms, 305, 63-72.
Devillers, J., & Chambon, P. (1986). Acute toxicity and QSAR of chlorophenols on Daphnia magna.
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 37(1), 599–605. doi:10.1007/BF01607810
PMID:3768559
Eroglu, E., Palaz, S., Oltulu, O., Turkmen, H., & Ozaydın, C. (2007). Comparative QSTR study using semi-empirical and first principle methods based descriptors for acute toxicity of diverse organic
compounds to the fathead minnow. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 8(12), 1265–1283.
doi:10.3390/ijms8121265
Ferguson, A. M., Heritage, T. W., Jonathon, P., Pack, S. E., Phillips, L., Rogan, J., & Snaith, P. J. (1997).
EVA: A new theoretically based molecular descriptor for use in QSAR\QSPR analysis. Journal of
Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 11(2), 143–152. doi:10.1023/A:1008026308790 PMID:9089432
Filho, E. B. A., Moraes, I. A., Weber, K. C., Rocha, G. B., & Vasconcellos, M. L. A. A. (2012). DFT/
PCM, QTAIM, 1H NMR conformational studies and QSAR modeling of thirty-two anti-Leishmania
amazonensis Morita–Baylis–Hillman Adducts. Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM, 1022,
72–80. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.04.051
Free, S. M., & Wilson, J. W. (1964). A mathematical contribution to structure–activity studies. Journal
of Medicinal Chemistry, 7(4), 395–399. doi:10.1021/jm00334a001 PMID:14221113
Fuentealba, P., & Reyes, O. (1993). Atomic softness and the electric dipole polarizability. Journal of
Molecular Structure THEOCHEM, 282(1-2), 65–70. doi:10.1016/0166-1280(93)85035-W
Fujita, T., & Ban, T. (1971). Structure-activity relation. 3. Structure–activity study of phenethylamines
as substrates of biosynthetic enzymes of sympathetic transmitters. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,
14(2), 148–152. doi:10.1021/jm00284a016 PMID:5544401
Fukui, K. (1975). Theory of orientation and stereoselection. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-64261917-5
Fukui, K. (1982). Role of frontier orbitals in chemical reactions. Science, 218(4574), 747–754. doi:10.1126/
science.218.4574.747 PMID:17771019
Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Nagata, C., & Shingu, H. (1954). Molecular orbital theory of orientation in
aromatic, heteroaromatic, and other conjugated molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 22(8),
1433–1442. doi:10.1063/1.1740412
Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., & Shingu, H. (1952). A molecular orbital theory of reactivity in aromatic
hydrocarbons. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 20(4), 722–725. doi:10.1063/1.1700523
Gao, H., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Garg, R., & Hansch, C. (1999). Comparative QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands. Chemical Reviews, 99(3), 723–744. doi:10.1021/cr980018g PMID:11749430
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
163
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Garg, R., Gupta, S. P., Gao, H., Babu, M. S., Debnath, A. K., & Hansch, C. (1999). Comparative quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on anti-HIV drugs. Chemical Reviews, 99(12), 3525–3602.
doi:10.1021/cr9703358 PMID:11849030
Gázquez, J. L., Cedillo, A., & Vela, A. (2007). Electrodonating and electroaccepting powers. The Journal
of Physical Chemistry A, 111(10), 1966–1970. doi:10.1021/jp065459f PMID:17305319
Geerlings, P., De. Proft, F., & Langenaeker, W. (2003). Conceptual density functional theory. Chemical
Reviews, 103(5), 1793–1874. doi:10.1021/cr990029p PMID:12744694
Ghanty, T. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (1993). Correlation between hardness, polarizability, and size of atoms,
molecules, and clusters. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 97(19), 4951–4953. doi:10.1021/j100121a015
Ghanty, T. K., & Ghosh, S. K. (1996). A density functional approach to hardness, polarizability, and
valency of molecules in chemical reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100(30), 12295–12298.
doi:10.1021/jp960276m
Ghosh, S. K., & Berkowitz, M. J. (1985). A classical fluid-like approach to the density-functional formalism
of many-electron systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 83(6), 2976–2983. doi:10.1063/1.449846
Gironés, X., & Carbó-Dorca, R. (2006). Modelling Toxicity using Molecular Quantum Similarity Measures. QSAR & Combinatorial Science, 25(7), 579–589. doi:10.1002/qsar.200530128
Gombar, V. K., Mattioni, B. E., Zwickl, C., & Deahl, J. T. (2006) Computational approaches for assessment of toxicity: A historical perspective and current status. In Computational toxicology: Risk
assessment for pharmaceutical and environmental chemicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi: (Chapter 7).
doi:10.1002/9780470145890
Gramatica, P. (2007). Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external. QSAR & Combinato-
rial Science, 26(5), 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151
Griffith, D. J. (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics. Prentice Hall, Inc.
Grover, M., Singh, B., Bakshi, M., & Singh, S. (2000a). Quantitative structure–Property relationships
in pharmaceutical research – Part 1. Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 3, 28–35.
Grover, M., Singh, B., Bakshi, M., & Singh, S. (2000b). Quantitative structure–property relationships in
pharmaceutical research – Part 2. Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 3(2), 50–57. doi:10.1016/
S1461-5347(99)00215-1 PMID:10664573
Gyftopoulos, E. P., & Hatsopoulos, G. N. (1968). Quantum-thermodynamic definition of electronegativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 60(3), 786–793.
doi:10.1073/pnas.60.3.786 PMID:16591659
Haghdadi, M., & Fatemi, M. H. (2010). Quantitative structure–Toxicity prediction of log(1/EC50) for
some benzene derivatives from their density functional theory calculated molecular descriptors. Bulletin
of the Chemical Society of Japan, 83(4), 345–350. doi:10.1246/bcsj.20090309
164
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property/Toxicity Relationships
Hall, L. H., & Kier, L. B. (1995). Electrotopological state indices for atom types: A novel combination
of electronic, topological, and valence state information. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer
Sciences, 35(6), 1039–1045. doi:10.1021/ci00028a014
Hammett, L. P. (1935). Some relations between reaction rates and equilibrium constants. Chemical
Reviews, 17(1), 125–136. doi:10.1021/cr60056a010
Hammett, L. P. (1937). The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. Benzene derivatives. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 59(1), 96–103. doi:10.1021/ja01280a022
Hannongbua, S., Nivasanond, K., Lawtrakul, L., Pungpo, P., & Wolschann, P. (2001). 3D-Quantitative
structure−activity relationships of HEPT derivatives as HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors, based
on ab initio calculations. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 41(3), 848–855.
doi:10.1021/ci0001278 PMID:11410067
Hansch, C. (1993). Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the unnamed science. Accounts of
Chemical Research, 26(4), 147–153. doi:10.1021/ar00028a003
Hansch, C., & Clayton, J. M. (1973). Lipophilic character and biological activity of drugs II: The parabolic
case. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 62(1), 1–21. doi:10.1002/jps.2600620102 PMID:4566530
Hansch, C., & Fujita, T. (1995). Classical and three-dimensional QSAR in agrochemistry. ACS Publica-
tions. doi:10.1021/bk-1995-0606
Hansch, C., & Gao, H. (1997). Comparative QSAR: Radical reactions of benzene derivatives in chemistry
and biology. Chemical Reviews, 97(8), 2995–3060. doi:10.1021/cr9601021 PMID:11851484
Hansch, C., Gao, H., & Hoekman, D. (1998). A generalized approach to comparative QSAR. Washington,
DC: Taylor and Francis.
Hansch, C., Hoekman, D., & Gao, H. (1996). Comparative QSAR: Toward a deeper understanding
of chemicobiological interactions. Chemical Reviews, 96(3), 1045–1076. doi:10.1021/cr9400976
PMID:11848780
Hansch, C., Kim, D., Leo, A. J., Novellino, E., Silipo, C., & Vittoria, A. etal. (1989). Toward a quantitative comparative toxicology of organic compounds. CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 19(3), 185–226.
doi:10.3109/10408448909037471 PMID:2653732
Hansch, C., & Klein, T. E. (1986). Molecular graphics and QSAR in the study of enzyme-ligand interactions. On the definition of bioreceptors. Accounts of Chemical Research, 19(12), 392–400. doi:10.1021/
ar00132a003
Hansch, C., Kurup, A., Garg, R., & Gao, H. (2001). Chem-bioinformatics and QSAR: A review of
QSAR lacking positive hydrophobic terms. Chemical Reviews, 101(3), 619–672. doi:10.1021/cr0000067
PMID:11712499
Hansch, C., Leo, A., Hoekman, D., & Heller, S. R. (1995). Exploring Qsar. Washington, DC: American
Chemical Society.
EBSCOhost - printed on 2/14/2023 7:16 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
165