Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3695_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 3 Radiograph of the heart at necropsy. Ahuge amount of calcium is located beneath the posterior mitral leaet and extends across the anterior (A) mitral leaet forming a circle “O.” The left circumex coronary artery (LCCA) is heavily and dif­fusely calcied (about 50% of patients with a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve have a dominant left circumex rather than a dominant right coronary artery [RCA], the situation in about 90% of patients with a tricuspid aortic valve). Calcic deposits also are present in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries.
of the posterior mitral valve leaet and the mural endocardium of the left ventricle. When the calcium deposits are extensive, a “C”-shaped or “J”-shaped conguration can appear on radiograph. In rare cases, the calcium extends across the anterior mitral leaet forming an “O”-shaped conguration. annular calcium is often associated with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation, but severe regurgitation due to the calcium deposits alone probably does not
2
Signicant mitral stenosis due to annular calcium has been reported only
occur. in the setting of left ventricular outow obstruction, as occurred in the present patient.
3
REFERENCES
1. Roberts WC. The senile cardi ac calcication syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1986;58: 572–574.
2. Roberts WC, Waller BF. Mitral valve “annular” calcium forming a complete
circle or “O” conguration: clinical and necropsy observations. Am Heart J 1981;101:619–621.
3. Hammer WJ, Roberts WC, deLeon AC. “Mitral stenosis” secondary to combined
“massive” mitral annular calcic deposits and small, hypertrophied left ventri­cles. Hemodynamic documentation in four patients. Am J Med 1978;64:371–376.
210
2
Mitral
CASE 1357 MITRAL “ANNULAR” CALCIUM FORMING A COMPLETE CIRCLE “O”
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 4 Photographs of the heart at necropsy. Upper left: view of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricles showing normal-sized cavities and a small area of myocardial necrosis in the posterior wall; lower left: transverse sections of the cardiac ventricles showing small cavities and no myocardial lesions; upper right: view of mitral (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) orices from the atrial aspects, with pulmonary trunk (PT); lower right: close-up view of the MV from the left atrium showing the anterior (A) and posterior (P) leaets.
211
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 1359 The Heaviest Known Operatively-Excised Aortic Valve
John B. Sims, MD
a,b
, Brad J. Roberts, BS, RDCS
Robert F. Hebeler, Jr., MD
a,c
, and Paul A. Grayburn, MD
a,b
, William C. Roberts, MD
a,b
*
a,b
,
A 60-year-old man whose operatively excised stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve weighed nearly 15 g, approximately 30 times the normal weight in an adult, is described. To the investigators’ knowledge, this is the heaviest aortic valve ever encountered in a human being. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
(Am J Cardiol 2006;97:588–589)
1
The normal tricuspid aortic valve in adults weighs on average 0.5 g. stenotic operatively excised aortic valves weigh from 1 to 6 g, and the heaviest, until the present case, seen by 1 of us (WCR) over a 40-year period was just >11 g.
Most
2
In this report, we describe a patient whose operatively excised stenotic aortic valve weighed nearly 15 g.
• • •
A 60-year-old weightlifter born in August1944 was referred due to a thoracic aortic aneurysm. At age 55, he was told that his heart was “too severely damaged to undergo a cardiac operation.” In recent months, he had developed exertional and nocturnal dyspnea, lower leg edema, and a 20-pound increase in weight. His body mass index was 26 kg/m
2
. He was well developed and muscular. Agrade 4/6 diastolic blowing murmur was present and best heard over the cardiac apex, and a grade 3/6 systolic ejection murmur was present and best heard over the right upper sternal border. The lungs were clear, and there was no subcutaneous edema. The blood hematocrit was 36%. An electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia with left bundle branch block and a QRS width of 160 ms. By transthoracic echocardiography, the diameter of the aorta at or near the sinotubular junction was 6.5cm, the left ventricular peak systolic diameter was 7.7cm, and the left ventricular peak diastolic diameter was 8.3cm. The left ventricu lar ejection fract ion was about 25%. The aortic valve was bicuspid, severely regurgitant, moderately stenotic, and heavily calcied. Calcic deposits were also present in the mitral annular region, and moderate mitral regurgitation was present. During evaluation, the patient developed atrial brillation, with a ventricular rate of 120 beats/min, his blood pressure decreased to 90/60mm Hg, and severe dyspnea ensued. Rapid cardioversion was successfully performed, and the dyspnea lessened. His serum creatinine decreased from 1.8 to 1.4 mg/dl with diuresis.
Cardiac catheterization disclosed normal epicardial coronary arteries and the
following pressures: pulmonary artery wedge A wave 35, V wave 42, and mean
a
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, bHeart and Vascular Institute,
c
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
and Manuscript received August31, 2005; revised manuscript received and accepted September2,
2005.
*
Corresponding author: Tel: 214-820-7712; fax: 214-820-7533. E-mail address: paulgr@baylorhealth.edu (P.A. Grayburn).
212 DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-43
CASE 1359 THE HEAVIEST KNOWN OPERATIVELY-EXCISED AORTIC VALVE
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 1 The patient’s aortic valve is shown in a photograph (left) and an x-ray (right). The valve consists of 2 cusps. One cusp has a raphe, and the length of the
raphe from the free margin to its extension of the aorta measures about 3.8cm. The raphe cusp is heavily calcied and weighs 8.78 g. The nonraphe cusp weighs 5.53 g. The 2 cusps together weigh 14.31 g.
33mm Hg; pulmonary artery 65/30mm Hg; right ventricle 63/17mm Hg; and aorta 90/52mm Hg (mean 69). The left ventricular cavity was not entered by the catheter. The cardiac index was 2.54 L/min/m
2
.
On December 14, 2004, the ascending aorta was replaced with a 30-mm Hemashield graft (Boston Scientic, Natick, Massachusetts), which included a 29 free style porcine xenograft with implantation of the coronary arteries into the graft. Mitral valvuloplasty was also performed. The aortic valve weighed 14.31 g (Figure 1). Because of early bleeding postoperatively, the patient was taken back to the operating room for reexploration of the mediastinum, where a hematoma was found and evacuated. Because of complete heart block produced at operation, a biventricular pacemaker was inserted 7 days postoperatively. When contacted 7 months after the operation, the patient had no symptoms attributable to heart disease.
• • •
What might be the explanation for the huge mass of this patient’s aortic valve? It is now well established that congenitally unicuspid and bicuspid stenotic aortic valves are on average much heavier than stenotic tricuspid aortic valves.
2
The present patient had a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Furthermore, it is now well established that men with stenotic aortic valves on average have heavier valves than women with stenotic aortic valves, and the patient described herein was a man. It is also known that patients with signicantly elevated serum cholesterol levels have more calcic deposits in their aortic valve cusps, mitral annuli, and epicardial coronary arteries than other subjects of similar ages and the same gender with much
213
2
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
lower levels. have serum total cholesterol levels >800 mg/dl at birth and by age 10years may develop considerable calcic aortic stenosis.
3
Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, for example,
4
Unfortunately, the cholesterol numbers in the present patient were uncertain. Larger adult patients with stenotic aortic valves tend to have larger valves than smaller patients of similar ages and the same gender. The present patient, however, weighed only 165 pounds (75 kg) and was 68 inches (173cm) in height.
The weight of a stenotic aortic valve is determined principally by the quantity of calcium in the valve. Of nearly 2,000 operatively excised stenotic aortic valves in patients >20years of age examined by 1 of us (WCR), only 2 did not have calcic deposits. The quantity of deposits in the aortic valve in this patient was by far the greatest any of us had seen previously, but the reason for such a large quantity of calcium in the present patient was unclear.
REFERENCES
1. Silver MA, Roberts WC. Detailed anatomy of the normally functioning aortic
valve in hearts of normal and increased weight. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:454 – 461.
2. Roberts WC, Ko JM. Weights of operatively-excised stenotic unicuspid, bicuspid,
and tricuspid aortic valves and their relation to age, sex, body mass index, and presence or absence of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1057–1065.
3. Boon A, Cheriex E, Lodder J, Kessels F. Cardiac valve calcication: character-
istics of patients with calcication of the mitral annulus or aortic valve. Heart 1997;78:472–474.
4. Sprecher DL, Schaefer EJ, Kent KM, Gregg RE, Zech LA, Hoeg JM, McManus
B, Roberts WC, Brewer HB Jr. Cardiovascular features of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: analysis of 16 patients. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:20–30.
214
CASE 1361 A STARR-EDWARDS PROSTHESIS IN THE MITRAL VALVE POSITION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 1361 A Starr-Edwards Model 6120 Mechanical Prosthesis in the Mitral Valve Position for 38Years
Mark A. Peterman, MD, Michael S. Donsky, MD, Gregory J. Matter, MD, and William Clifford Roberts, MD*
The Starr-Edwards caged-ball prosthesis for cardiac valve replacement was rst successfully used in the mitral position in September1960. Because of swelling of the silicone rubber poppet due to lipid inltration, the processing of the silicone rubber was altered in 1965 in hopes of preventing poppet degeneration. We describe ndings in a woman who had mitral valve replacement in 1965 utilizing the revised silicone rubber poppet; the prosthesis remained in place for 38years.
• • •
A 78-year-old woman was admitted to Baylor University Medical Center in August2003 in functional class IV heart failure. At age 38 (1963), she had had aortic valve replacement with a Starr-Edwards mechanical prosthesis and mitral valve commissurotomy. At age 40 (1965), she had repeat aortic valve replacement and mitral valve replacement, both with Starr-Edwards mechanical prostheses. She did well until age 63 (1988), when a third aortic valve replacement, this time with a St. Jude Medical prosthesis, and a tricuspid valve annuloplasty were performed. She also had chronic anemia, for which she had received several transfusions.
On admission, blood pressure was 110/63mm Hg, and heart rate was 82 beats/ min. Her body mass index was 23 kg/m the left sternal border and a grade 2/6 diastolic murmur at the cardiac apex. Rales were heard at the bases of both lungs. The liver was large, and the lower legs were severely edematous. The hemoglobin was 9.5 g/dl, and the hemotocrit was 29.5%.
An echocardiogram disclosed that her mean transmitral diastolic gradient was 18mm Hg; the left ventricular ejection fraction was about 50%. The aortic pressure was 150/59mm Hg, and the pulmonary artery pressure, 75/20mm Hg. Coronary arteriography showed no signicant coronary narrowings.
The Starr-Edwards model 6120/30 mm (3M) mechanical valve, which had been in the mitral position for 38 years, was excised and a porcine bioprosthesis was implanted via a right mini-thoracotomy approach. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the fth postoperative day after reinitiation of warfarin therapy.
After photographi ng it, the excised Sta rr-Edwards prosthesis was sent to Edwards Lifesciences LLC (Irving, California), the laboratory that had originally produced the prosthesis. The prosthesis was disassembled to acquire the serial number of the valve, which conrmed it to be a model 6120. The poppet was deeply orange, swollen,
2
. Agrade 3/6 systolic murmur was heard at
Departments of Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division), Cardiothoracic Surgery and Pathology, and the Baylor Heart & Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Manuscript received September 6, 2005; revised manuscript received and accepted October11, 2005.
*
Corresponding author: Tel: 214-820-7911; fax: 214-820-7533.
E-mail address: wc.roberts@BaylorHealth.edu (W.C. Roberts).
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-44 215
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 1 Views of the operatively excised model 6120 Starr-Edwards prosthesis that had been in place for 38years.
Figure 2 View of the poppet and age after incising the poppet in its mid-portion. The arrow (left) shows a region of elongated wear marks. The ball shows a demarca­tion of color probably corresponding to penetration of blood components, primarily lipids, by absorption (right).
216
CASE 1361 A STARR-EDWARDS PROSTHESIS IN THE MITRAL VALVE POSITION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 3 Scanning electron micrograph showing micropores on the poppet’s sur­face (each ×500).
and moved only when signicant pressure was applied (Figure1). Asenior scientist at the manufacturer’s laboratory determined that the prosthetic poppet weighed 7.4 g, a gain of 0.9 g from its original weight (14% increase). After cutting the poppet in half, the maximal diameter was 21.8mm, an increase of 1.7mm (8% increase) from its original diameter (Figure2). Several cuts were present on the poppet’s surface, each about 1mm long, and light wear groovings, due to restricted motion/rotation, also were present on the poppet’s surface. Additionally, micropores were evident on the poppet’s surface on scanning electron microscopy (Figure3). The maximal excursion of the poppet was about 0.5cm. There was also host tissue overgrowth covering about 50% of the aortic aspect of the prosthetic ring (Figure1). (This tissue overgrowth combined with the poppet swelling restricted poppet motion leading to both prosthetic stenosis and erythrocyte hemolysis. The latter resulted from high shear jetting backow from incomplete seating of the poppets.) Other than a local burnish region on 1 of the 4 metallic struts, corresponding to the sliding contact of the poppet as opposed to the normal rolling contact, the cage and the other 3 metallic struts showed no evidence of wear.
• • •
The rst successful mechanical prosthesis in the mitral valve position in humans was the Starr-Edwards Model 6000. systemic embolization as well as ball variance
1
This model had a signicant incidence of
1
(occasionally lethal2). The model 6120 Starr-Edwards mitral valve prosthesis was introduced in 1965 with a reduction in the surface area of metallic components, and an improved barium-impregnated
1
poppet.
This model had a far lower incidence of systemic embolization (3% vs 38%)
217
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
compared with model 6000.
1
The next models (6300) were introduced in 1968 and added cloth covering to the stents. The modied cloth-covered series (model 6400 or track valve) was introduced in 1974 and discontinued in 1980, because results showed no advantage over the original 6120 model.
Although ball variance is usually discovered within 8 years of implantation, late ball variance has been described in early models in patients up to 20 years after implantation. reoperation of a Starr-Edwards mitral prosthesis was 31years in a cloth-covered model with a metal poppet.
3
The longest interval previously reported from implantation to
4
To our knowledge, ball variance has not been reported in the model 6120 Starr-Edwards prosthesis. The present case is remarkable for the extremely late onset of prosthetic mitral valve stenosis and the occurrence of severe ball variance in a model 6120 Starr-Edwards mitral valve prosthesis.
REFERENCES
1. Freimanis I, Starr A. The unnatural history of valvular heart disease. Late results
with silastic ball valve prostheses. J Cardiovasc Surg 1984;25:191–198.
2. Roberts WC, Levinson GE, Morrow AG. Lethal ball variance in the Starr-Edwards
prosthetic mitral valve. Arch Intern Med 1970;126:517–521.
3. Grunkemeier GL and Starr A. Late ball variance with model 1000 Starr-Edwards
aortic valve prosthesis. Risk analysis and strategy of operative management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;91:918–923.
4. Goshima M, Shiono M, Yamamoto T, Inoue T, Hata M, Sezai A, Niino T, Nakamura
T, Ye Z, Negishi N, Sezai Y. Reoperation for a Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis implanted in mitral position 31years ago. Jpn J Thorac Surg 2003;56:535–540.
218
CASE 1374 SUDDEN ONSET OF “CARDIAC” SYMPTOMS
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 1374 Sudden Onset of “Cardiac” Symptoms, (?) Mild or Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Involving a Congenitally Bicuspid Aortic Valve, and Nearly Normal Coronary Arteries in an Octogenarian
William C. Roberts, MD,
1-3
Paul A. Grayburn, MD
1-3
An 86-year-old woman who lived alone was in good health until one evening, just after cleaning the kitchen, she suddenly noted palpitations, dizziness, weakness, and cool clammy skin while sitting. She called an ambulance service and was brought to a hospital. The symptoms resolved spontaneously after a few minutes. She was 61 inches tall and weighed 158 lb (body mass index, 29.8 kg/m
2
). Agrade 2–3/6 systolic ejection murmur was heard over the precordium and best at the cardiac base and into both carotid arteries. An ECG showed sinus rhythm, atrial premature complexes, and no ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities. An echocardiogram (Figure 1) disclosed the following dimensions in centimeters: left ventricle end diastole was 4.3 and peak systole was 3.7, left ventricular and ventricular septal walls were each 1.3, and the left atrial cavity was 3.1. The calculated peak transvalvular aortic gradient was 47 mm Hg; blood hematocrit was 33% and hemoglobin was
10.9 g/dL. S erum total cholesterol was 260mm Hg, low-density lipoprotei n cholesterol 177mm Hg, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 88 mm Hg, and triglycerides 62 mg/dL. Troponins and creatine kinase levels were normal.
Cardiac catheterization disclosed the following pressures: pulmonary artery wedge Awave 29, V wave 36, mean 25; pulmonary artery, 54/26; right ventricle, 62/23; left ventricle, 206/33; and ascending aorta, 183/80m m Hg. The peak transaortic valve gradient was 23 and the mean gradient was 29mm Hg, the calculated aortic valve area was 0.61cm was 60%. The cardiac index was 2.2 L/min/m
2
(index, 0.36cm2/m2), and the left ventricular ejection fraction
2
. Coronary angiogram disclosed no
signicant narrowings.
The aortic valve at operation was found to be congenitally bicuspid (Figure2). It was excised virtually intact. It weighed 2.51 g: the raphe cusp weighed 1.74 g and the nonraphe cusp, 0.69 g
12
. Her postoperative course was uneventful.
COMMENTS
The above-described elderly woman who was known to have a precordial murmur for many years was asymptomatic until a single near-syncopal episode prompted hospitalization and cardiac evaluation. The transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradient across her aortic valve was only 23mm Hg (mean gradient, 29mm Hg) in
From the Departments of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology;1 and Pathology;2 and
the Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute,
Address for correspondence: William C. Roberts, MD, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor
University Medical Center, 621 North Hall Street, Suite H-030, Dallas, TX 75226
E-mail: wc.roberts@baylorhealth.edu
Copyright of American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology is the property of LeJacq Communications, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-45 219
3
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX