Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3695_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 2 Close-up views of the lonescu-Shiley bioprostheses in the tricuspid (T) and mitral (M) valve positions. a and a′, from the atrial aspects, the orices of each are xed in a triangular shape. b, 1 stent (dashed arrow) has burrowed into thê right ventricular free wall. One stent is encircled by a suture (curved solid arrows). b′, 1 suture (arrows) crosses 2 bioprosthetic cusps holding each rigidly in place. The Björk-Shiley prosthesis is visible at the upper left. c, another view of the suture encircling the stent. c′, close-up of the suture inadvertently holding down 2 biopros- thetic cusps. (Photographs by M.M.M. Moore.)
operator has satisfactorily shown that each cusp of the bioprosthesis is freely mobile, a requirement to prevent bioprosthetic regurgitation.
REFERENCE
1. Silver MA, Orenburg PR, Roberts WC. Severe mitral regurgitation after mitral
valve replacement with a parietal pericardial bovine bioprosthesis. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:218–219.
170
CASE 724 EXTENSIVE CALCIFICATION OF A BIOPROSTHESIS IN THE TRICUSPID VALVE POSITION
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 724 Extensive Calcification of a Bioprosthesis in the Tricuspid Valve Position and Minimal Calcification of a Simultaneously Implanted Bioprosthesis in the Mitral Valve Position
Deborah J. Barbour, MD, Charles L. Mcintosh, MD, PhD, and William C. Roberts, MD
Previous reports describing results of simultaneously implanted and explanted porcine bioprostheses in the mitral and aortic valve positions tricuspid valve positions
3
have shown greater degeneration in those bioprostheses
1, 2
and mitral and
in the mitral position than in either aortic or tricuspid valve positions. The reasons for the more rapid degeneration of the bioprostheses in the mitral position than in either the aortic or tricuspid valve positions are not clear, but probably are related to the higher closing pressure on the bioprosthetic cusps in the mitral position. In contrast to previous observations, a patient who had recently undergone study had much heavier calcic deposits on the cusps of the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position than on those of the bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Abrief description of this patient follows.
T.H., a 38-year-old Greek woman, had a mitral valve commissurotomy at age 19years. By age 29, anasarca prompted cardiac catheterization (Table 1) and then simultaneous tricuspid and mitral valve replacements with 31- and 27-mm Hancock porcine bioprostheses for pure tricuspid valve regurgitation and mitral valve stenosis. She did well for 7years, and then peripheral edema, dyspnea, anasarca and dizziness occurred. Catheterization (Table 1) at age 37 revealed severe stenosis of the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position and moderate stenosis of the bioprosthesis in the mitral valve position, and 105 months after their initial simultaneous implantation, both bioprostheses were replaced, a 29-mm Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position and a Starr-Edwards mechanical prosthesis in the mitral position. At operation, thrombus was removed from both atria. The bioprosthesis explanted from the tricuspid valve position had far heavier calcic deposits than did the one explanted from the mitral position (Figure1).
The cause of the greater degree of calcium on the bioprosthetic cusps in the tricuspid valve position than on the bioprosthetic cusps in the mitral valve position
Table 1: Hemodynamic data
Age
(yr)
PA
(S/d)
RV
(s/d)
RA
(m)
RA-RV
mdg
LV
(s/d)
SA
(s/d)
PAW
(m)
PAW-LV
mdg Cl
29 115/60 115/18 18 0 105/12 105/65 25 17 1.8 38 32/19 32/4 16 13 95/4 100/60 12 11 2.4
Pressures are in mm Hg. Cl=cardiac index in liters/min/m
ent; PA=pulmonary artery; PAW=pulmonary artery wedge; RA=right atrium; RV=right ventricle; SA=systemic artery; s/d=peak systole/end diastole.
From the Pathology and Surgery Branches, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Manuscript received and accepted July1, 1986.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-30 171
2
; LV=left ventricle; m=mean; mdg=mean diastolic gradi-
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 1 Explanted bioprostheses. Upper panel, radiograph (left) and photographs (center and right) of the bioprosthesis explanted from the tricuspid valve position; lower panel, radiograph (left) and photographs (center and right) of the bioprosthe-
sis explanted from the mitral position. The photographs in the center are the atrial aspect of the bioprosthesis and those at the right, the ventricular aspect.
was not determined. The closing pressure on the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position was only one-third of that on the bioprosthetic cusps in the mitral position (32 vs 95mm Hg).
REFERENCES
1. Warnes CA, Scott ML, Silver GM, Smith CW, Ferrans VJ, Roberts WC. Comparison
of late degenerative changes in porcine bioprostheses in the mitral and aortic valve position in the same patient. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:965–968.
2. Cipriano PR, Billingham ME, Miller DC. Calcication of aortic versus mitral
porcine bioprosthetic heart valves; a radiographic study comparing amounts of calcic deposits in valves explanted from the same patient. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:1030–1032.
3. Cohen SR, Silver MA, McIntosh CL, Roberts WC. Comparison of late (62 to 140
months) degenerative changes in simultaneously implanted and explanted por­cine (Hancock) bioprostheses in the tricuspid and mitral valve positions in six patients. Am J Cardiol 1984;53;1599–1602.
172
CASE 788 BIOPROSTHESES IN TRICUSPID AND MITRAL VALVE POSITIONS FOR 100 MONTHS
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 788 Bioprostheses in Tricuspid and Mitral Valve Positions for 100 Months with Heavier Calcific Deposits on the Left-Sided Valve Followed by New Bioprostheses in Both Positions for 95 Months with Heavier Calcific Deposits on the Right-Sided Valve
Benjamin N. Potkin, MD Charles L. Mcintosh, MD, PhD, Richard O. Cannon III, MD, William C. Roberts, MD
Previous reports describing results of simultaneously implanted and explanted bioprostheses in the mitral and aortic valve positions and in the mitral and tricuspid positions usually, but not always, have shown greater degeneration of the bioprostheses in the mitral position than in either the aortic or tricuspid valve position, presumably because of the h igher closing pressure on t he bioprosthet ic cusps in the mitral p osition. Herein, we describe a patient who had simultaneous bioprosthetic replacement of both mitral and tricuspid valves. Later replacement of both bioprostheses revealed heavier calcic deposits on the bioprosthesis in the mitral position after the rst bioprosthetic replacement and heavier calcic deposits on the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position after the second bioprosthetic replacement.
E.V., a 62-year-old white woman with systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus, had 4 cardiac valve operations (Table 1). Congestive heart failure developed during her second pregnancy and 1 year later, at age 35, she underwent closed mitral commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. She was nearly asymptomatic for 2 years thereafter and then congestive heart failure and atrial brillation developed. Because of worsening congestive heart failure, at age 46 she had simultaneous replacement of both native mitral and tricuspid valves with Hancock no. 29 and 31 glutaraldehype processed bioprostheses, respectively. She was asymptomatic for the next 8years when congestive heart failure reappeared at age 54. Left ventricular cineangiogram now demonstrated 4+/4+ mitral regurgitation and a 22mm Hg mean diastolic pressure gradient across the bioprosthesis in the mitral position. At age 54, the 2 bioprostheses, each of which had been in place for 100 months, were excised along with the diffusely thickened, purely regurgitant aortic valve and all 3 were replaced with Hancock bioprostheses. The excised bioprosthesis in the mitral position had heavier calcic deposits than did the bioprothesis in the tricuspid valve position (Figure1). Postoperatively, she again was asymptomatic. Catheterization, 7 months later, disclosed a 11mm Hg mean diastolic pressure gradient across the bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Pulmonary hypertension persisted. Congestive heart failure recurred at age 61years, 86 months after the last operation. Nine months later or 3 days before death the 3 bioprosthetic valves were replaced because of refractory congestive heart failure. The bioprosthesis that had been in the tricuspid valve position had heavier calcic deposits than that present on the bioprostheses that had been in either the mitral or aortic valve position (Figure2).
This patient is unique in that 2 prostheses had each been in place for 100 months and 3 other bioprostheses had each been in place for 95 months. When the initially inserted 2 bioprostheses were explanted, heavier calcic deposits were present in the bioprosthesis that had been in the mitral valve position compared with the one that
1–4
From the Pathology, Surgery and Cardiology Branches, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institues of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Manuscript received October15, 1987; revised manuscript received and accepted November13, 1987.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-31 173
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
Figure 1 Radiographs (top) and photographs (bottom) of bioprostheses that had been in place in the tricuspid (T) and mitral (M) valve positions for 100 months. Heavier calcic deposits are present in the prosthesis that had been in the mitral valve position. Additionally, 1 cusp of the prosthesis in the mitral position was torn (arrow) and this bioprosthesis was severely regurgitant.
Figure 2 Radiographs (top) and photographs (bottom) of bioprostheses explanted 3 days before death and which had been in place in the tricuspid (T), mitral (M) and aortic (A) valve positions for 95 months. Heavier calcic deposits are present in the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position than in the bioprosthesis in either the mitral or aortic valve positions.
174
CASE 788 BIOPROSTHESES IN TRICUSPID AND MITRAL VALVE POSITIONS FOR 100 MONTHS
https://t.me/medicina_free
had been in the tricuspid valve position. When these malfunctioning bioprostheses were excised and replaced with other bioprostheses that were in place for nearly the same amount of time, namely 95 months, heavier calcic deposits developed in the bioprosthesis that had been in the tricuspid valve position compared with that occurring in either bioprosthesis located on the left side of the heart.
The explanation for the reversal of the heavier calcic deposits in the tricuspid and mitral valve positions during the 2 time frames (100 months with the initially inserted bioprostheses and 95 months with the replaced bioprostheses) is unclear. It is likely that during much of the postoperative period after the initial double valve replacement the right ventricular systolic pressure, which represents the closing pressure on the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position, was only mildly elevated (37mm Hg). In contrast, after the bioprostheses in the tricuspid and mitral valve positions were replaced, the right ventricular systolic pressure remained elevated (65mm Hg), probably during the entire 95-month period. During this latter 95-month period of high right ventricular systolic pressures, heavier calcic deposits developed on the cusps of the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position than on the cusps of the bioprosthesis in the mitral valve position. The closing pressure, i.e., the left ventricular systolic pressure, on the bioprosthesis in the mitral position, however, was always considerably higher than was the closing pressure on the bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position: 160 vs 37mm Hg after the rst valve replacements and 210 vs 65mm Hg after the bioprosthetic replacements. Thus, factors other than bioprosthetic closing pressures must have played a role in determining which bioprosthesis in the atrioventricular valve positions contained the heavier calcic deposits.
Table 1: Patient’s hemodynamic data
Month/year 5/1970 8/1971 6/1979 1/1980 8/1986
Age (yr) 45 46 54 55 61 NYHA FC III I III I III SA (s/d) 160/95 150/90 112/70 205/90 137/76 RA V (mean) 25 (18) 14 (10) 26 (22) 16 (13) 22 (20) RV (s/d) 60/9 37/7 75/16 65/7 67/20 PA (s/d) 60/30 37/20 80/40 65/28 68/28 PAW V (mean) 34 (25) 26 (20) 47 (38) 40 (28) 34 (25) LV (s/d) 155/16 160/12 117/16 210/25 158/17 CO/CI 5.4/3.1 6.3/3.8 2.2/1.4 5.2/3.3 4.0/2.5 LV-SA psg 0 10 0 5 21 PAW-LV mdg 13 8 22 11 10 RA-RV mdg 6 7 8 7 6 MVA/MVI *0.8/0.5 2.8/1.7 TVA/TVI 2.2/1.3 1.4/0.9 1.4/0.9 1.4/0.9 AR by AA cine (0 to 4+) 0 0 2+/4+ 0 1+/4+ MRby LV cine (0 to 4+) 1+/4+ 0 4+/4+ 0 0
All pressures are in mm Hg. All valve replacements were with Hancock bioprosthesis (size in
parenthesis): mitral commissurotomy, 1959; MVR (29) and TVR (31), 2/1971; MVR (27), TVR (31) and AVR (19), 6/1979.
* Calculated valve area underestimated because of mild mitral regurgitation.
Not possible to calculate valve area because of severe mitral regurgitation.
AA=ascending aorta; AR=aortic regurgitation; AVR=aortic valve replacement; CI=cardiac
index (liters/min/m ventricular; mdg=mean diastolic gradient; MR=mitral regurgitation; MVA=mitral valve area; MVI=mitral valve index; MVR=mitral valve replacement; NYHA FC= New York Heart Association functional class; PA=pulmonary artery; PAW=pulmonary artery wedge pressure; psg=peak systolic gradient; RA=right arterial; RV=right ventricular; SA=systemic artery; s/d = systolic/diastolic; TVA = tricuspid valve area; TVI = tricuspid valve index; TVR=tricuspid valve replacement.
2
); Cine=cineangiography; CO=cardiac output (liters/min); LV=left
2.1/1.3 1.3/0.8
175
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
REFERENCES
1. Warnes CA, Scott ML, Silver GM, Smith CW, Ferrans VJ, Roberts WC. Comparison
of late degenerative changes in porcine bioprostheses in the mitral and aortic valve position in the same patient. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:965–968.
2. Cipriano PR, Billingham ME, Miller DC. Calcication of aortic versus mitral por-
cine bioprosthetic heart valves: a radiographic study comparing amounts of calcic deposits in valves explanted from the same patient. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:1030–1032.
3. Cohen SR, Silver MA, McIntosh CL, Roberts WC. Comparison of late (62 to 140
months) degenerative changes in simultaneously implanted and explanted por­cine (Hancock) bioprostheses in the tricuspid and mitral valve positions in six patients. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1599–1602.
4. Barbour DJ, McIntosh CL, Roberts WC. Extensive calcication of a bioprosthe-
sis in the tricuspid valve position and minimal calcication of a simultaneously implanted bioprosthesis in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:179–180.
176
CASE 806 “QUADRICUSPIDIZATION” OF APREVIOUSLY THREE-CUSPID AORTIC VALVE
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 806 “Quadricuspidization” of aPreviously Three-Cuspid Aortic Valve
Jessica M. Mann, MD, and William C. Roberts, MD
Bethesda, MD
Quadricuspid aortic valves have always been described as congenital in origin.
1–4
Surgical manipulation of a previously normal tri-cuspid aortic valve may transform the latter into a quadricuspid valve. Such was the case in the patient described below.
R.B., a 39-year-old man, was found at age 13years to have discrete subaortic stenosis with a left ventricular (230/8mm Hg)-to-aortic (96/60mm Hg) peak systolic pressure gradient of 134mm Hg. The cardiac index was 3.6 L/min/m
2
. When he was 13years old he underwent resection of a subaortic “membrane” by Dr. Andrew G. Morrow. At operation, the aortic valve was described as tri-cuspid and each cusp was normal. The patient was asymptomatic after operation. At age 16, no peak systolic pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the aortic valve was present, but an aortic angiogram disclosed 2+/4+ aortic regurgitation. At age 30, he had several dizzy spells and a Holter monitor disclosed multifocal ventricular premature complexes and runs of ventricular tachycardia. Serial echocardiograms showed anterior mitral leaet utter and progressive left ventricular dilatation,
Figure 1 View of the acquired quadricuspid aortic valve from the aorta. The four cusps are thickened by brous tissue and some degree of commissural fusion is present. Arrows point out the four commissures. The accessory cusp is posterior and smaller than the “true” posterior cusp. LM=left main coronary artery; R=right coronary artery.
From the Pathology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of
Health.
Reprint requests: Pathology Branch, NHLBI-NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 2N-258, Bethesda, MD
20892.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-32 177
CASE REPORTS IN CARDIOLOGY
https://t.me/medicina_free
with a left ventricular diastolic dimension increasing from 66 to 80 mm and the systolic dimension increasing from 38 to 58mm. He died suddenly at home at age
39. At necropsy, the heart weighed 560 gm. The left ventricular outow tract was not narrowed. No foci of myocardial brosis or necrosis were present. The aortic valve was quadri-cuspid with two posterior cusps of unequal size (Figure1). The coronary arterial system was right-dominant, and all three coronary arteries had wide-open lumens.
Although there are no photographs to document the appearance of the aortic valve at operation 26years before death, the surgeon, Andrew G. Morrow, was an excellent describer of both normal and abnormal cardiovascular ndings at operation, and consequently there can be little doubt that the aortic valve consisted of three normal cusps at that time. Aortic regurgitation was noted for the rst time 2 years after operation, and it persisted for the remaining 24years of life. Thus operative manipulation of the aortic valve during operative resection of discrete subaortic stenosis can lead to transformation of a tricuspid into a quadricuspid aortic valve.
REFERENCES
1. Simonds JP. Congenital malformations of the aortic and pulmonary valves. Am J
Med Sci 1923;166:584–595.
2. Robicsek F, Sanger PW, Daugherty HK, Montgomery CC. Congenital quadri-
cuspid aortic valve with displacement of the left coronary orice. Am J Cardiol 1969;23:288–290.
3. Luisi VS, Pasque A, Vernelli F, Aliboni M, Urbano V, Reginato E. Quadricuspid
aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Surg 1984;25:252–254.
4. Matsumoto M, Miki S, Kusuhara K, Ueda Y, Ohkita Y, Tahata T, Komeda M.
Quadricuspid aortic valve associated with severe aortic regurgitation. Jpn Circ J 1984;49:190–191.
178
CASE 811 DEVELOPMENT OF SEVERE STENOSIS IN A CONGENITALLY BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE
https://t.me/medicina_free
Case 811 Development of Severe Stenosis in a Previously Purely Regurgitant, Congenitally Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Jay M. Kalan, MD, Charles L. McIntosh, MD, PhD, Robert O. Bonow, MD, and William C. Roberts, MD
A congenitally bicuspid aortic valve may function normally, it may be stenotic with or without associated regurgitation or it may be purely regurgitant (no associated stenosis). become stenotic (as calcic deposits build up) or it may become purely regurgitant (because of superimposed infective endocarditis or because of reasons unclear). Once a bicuspid valve develops some degree of stenosis, its course thereafter is one of gradually worsening stenosis; once a bicuspid valve develops some degree of pure regurgitation (without associated stenosis), its course thereafter is one of gradually worsening regurgitation. Recently, we encountered a man who 8 years earlier had evidence of severe pure aortic regurgitation (no element of stenosis) and thereafter he went on to develop severe aortic valve stenosis with virtual loss of the regurgitation. To our knowledge, conversion from pure aortic regurgitation to severe aortic stenosis has not been reported. This report records such an occurrence.
The posterior cusp was mobile but thickened by brous tissue; it contained a single small deposit of calcium. The anterior cusp, in contrast, was immobile and contained heavy calcic deposits.
1, 2
Such a valve may function normally for many years and then it may
A.H., a 70-year-old white man, had a precordial murmur when inducted into the armed
The excised native aortic valve consisted of 2 cusps weighing together 5.9 g (Figure2).
From the Pathology, Surgery and Cardiology Branches, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. Manuscript received May19, 1988; revised manuscript received and accepted June19, 1988.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003409281-33 179