Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5210_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
38 Мб
Скачать
 
388
22.3.6  Fixed Drug Eruption
Fixed drug eruptions (FDEs) are characterised by recurrence at the same site with repeated expo­sure to a particular drug. It usually presents as a solitary reactive area associated with the initial exposure, developing within 30 minutes to 8 hours after taking the drug. The size of the area infected may increase with subsequent exposure to the drug, and on occasions, multiple sites of involvement may develop(46).
The pathogenesis of FDE is still not fully elucidated; however, a number of factors including antibody production, antibody- dependent cell- mediated cytotoxicity and serum properties have been identified as contributors(47, 48).
+
T cells produce interferon γ, and by interacting with other inflammatory cells are thought
CD8 to be involved in the initial epidermal injury. The persistence in situ of CD8
+
memory T cells is hypothesised to account for the recurrence of lesions at the same location with repeated exposure to the offending drug. It has been suggested that cell- mediated hypersensitivity may play a role in pathogenesis(48, 49).
Cutaneous lesions appear as a dusky red macule, usually involving the extremities, genital region and lips. There may be an accompanying stinging or burning sensation. The lesions may be solitary or multiple clusters of lesions which can progress to vesiculation following repeated exposure to the inciting drug. These lesions will recur at the same anatomical location when the individual is exposed to the same drug again. There are often signs of post- inflammatory melanosis. Intraoral involvement of FDE is rare.
Management entails withdrawal of the inciting drug, topical application of corticosteroids and systemic antihistamines. In severe cases, supportive therapy such as maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance and systemic corticosteroids may be indicated(50).
Drugs that have been implicated in FDE are listed in Table22.9.
Table22.9  Drugs associated withfixed drug eruption.
Drug group Examples
Sulphonamide antibiotics/sulphones Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
Dapsone
Nitroimidazoles Metronidazole
Ornidazole Tinidazole
Tetracyclines Tetracycline
Doxycycline
Quinolones Ciprofloxacin
Norfloxacin Ofloxacin
Penicillins Penicillin
Amoxicillin
Macrolides Azithromycin
Clarithromycin Glycopeptides Vancomycin Cephalosporins Ceftriaxone
Cefixime
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
    
Table22.9  (Continued)
Drug group Examples
COX- 2inhibitors Etoricoxib
Celecoxib
Haemostatic drugs Tranexamic acid
Clopidogrel Ticagrelor Ticlopidine
Cardiovascular drugs Beta- blockers: atenolol, bisoprolol and propranolol
Statins: atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin
Antihistamines Cetirizine
Loratadine
Antivirals Acyclovir
Valacyclovir Famciclovir
Oral hypoglycaemics Dapagliflozin
Metformin Sitagliptin
Proton pump inhibitors Esomeprazole
Rabeprazole
Omeprazole Antifungals Fluconazole Phosphodiesterase- 5inhibitors Tadalafil
Sildenafil Immunomodulating agents Mycophenolate
Axitinib Musculoskeletal drugs Allopurinol Psychotropic drugs Modafinil Chemotherapeutic drugs Paclitaxel
Capecitabine Others Influenza vaccine
Covid vaccine
Herbal medicines
Iodine containing contrast
Multivitamins
389
Source: Adapted from McClatchy etal.(49).
22.3.7 Angioedema
Angioedema is characterised by rapid short- lived swelling of the skin, mucous membranes, or both including the upper respiratory and intestinal epithelial linings. It is short- lived, resolving within 24–72 hours without visible sequelae. The swelling is non- pitting and may be erythematous and slightly warm to touch. Pain is a variable symptom. When swelling occurs in the oropharynx and
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
 
390
Table22.10  Drugs associated withangioedema.
IgE mediated Penicillins
Cephalosporins Iodinated contrast media Neuromuscular blocking agents Pyrazoles Quinolones
Intolerance NSAIDs
Iodinated contrast media Neuromuscular blocking agents Pyrazolones Quinolones
Kinin- dependent ACEIs
Angiotensin II receptor blockers
Source: Adapted from Lerch etal.(51).
respiratory tract, it may be life- threatening. Gastrointestinal tract involvement may result in abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea.
Orofacial manifestations usually appear as rapid painless swelling of the lips, periorbital region and tongue. In cases of drug- induced angioedema, this reaction is triggered by contact with a specific drug in susceptible patients. The mechanism of drug- induced angioedema relates to the direct action of certain medications on mast cells, causing degranulation and subsequent inflammatory cytokine (histamine, serotonin and kinins) release(51).
The following three main categories of drug- induced angioedema are recognised:
1) Immediate hypersensitivity reaction to beta- lactam antibiotics.
This is the most frequent allergic reaction and is mediated by IgE. Iodinated contrast media, pyrazolones, quinolones and neuromuscular blockers may also cause angioedema byIgE- mediated pathways(52).
2) Aspirin and other NSAID- induced angioedema are generally considered to be an intolerance
rather than a true allergic reaction. Cyclooxygenase inhibition results in alterations in arachidonic acid metabolism, with overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes(53).
3) ACEI can elicit angioedema, which, although rarely occurring, can be life- threatening due to
upper airway obstruction. This reaction is caused by inhibition of bradykinin degradation(54).
Drugs most commonly implicated in angioedema are listed in Table22.10.
22.3.8 Mucosal Pigmentation
Certain drugs may induce oral mucosal pigmentation. This may be either extrinsic (non- melanocytic) or intrinsic (melanocytic) in origin. Drug- induced oral pigmentation usually appears as a widespread alteration in colour. There is a direct relationship between exposure to an inciting drug and the development of mucosal pigmentation. The timing of this is variable, with some cases noted soon after administration of the drug and others appearing days, weeks or years after(55).
The exact mechanism by which certain drugs induce oral mucosal pigmentation is not fully understood. It has been observed that some medications cause an increase in the number of
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
    
melanocytes in the epithelium, others increase melanin synthesis, and some pigmentation is the result of deposition of drug metabolites in the tissues (56–58). Certain drugs may also cause a change in colour of the alveolar bone and tooth substance.
The drugs most frequently associated with melanocytic mucosal pigmentation are the antineo­plastic agents, followed by the antimalarial medications. There appears to be a dose- dependent relationship between the intensity and extension of pigmentation. Lesions usually regress when the offending drug is withdrawn(58, 59).
Drug- induced intrinsic pigmentation has a variable presentation, ranging from grey–blue to brown macular lesions on the oral mucosa. These may be focal or multiple, localised or diffuse. The most frequent sites to be affected are the hard palate, gingival tissues and buccal mucosa.
Drugs most commonly associated with oral mucosal pigmentation are listed in Table22.11.
Additionally, some drugs such as iron, chlorhexidine, antibiotics and bismuth have been noted to cause temporary yellow–brown discolouration of the tissues, particularly the dorsal surface of the tongue.
Table22.11  Drugs associated withoral mucosa pigmentation.
Drug Pigmentation colour
Amiodarone Blue Aminophenazone Brown Amodiaquine Black, grey Arsenic Bismuth Blue, yellow–brown, black Busulphan Brown Chlorhexidine Yellow, brown Chloroquine Blue, grey Clofazimine Brown Copper Green Cyclophosphamide Doxorubicin Brown Fluorouracil Brown Fluoxetine Grey Gold Heroin Brown Hormone replacement therapy Brown Hydroxychloroquine Grey Iron Ketoconazole Brown Lead Grey Manganese Mepacrine Blue Methyldopa Black
391
(Continued)
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
 
392
Table22.11  (Continued)
Drug Pigmentation colour
Minocycline Blue, brown, black Oral contraceptives Brown Phenolphthalein Brown Phenothiazines Propranolol Brown Quinacrine Quinidine Blue Silver Blue, Grey Sulphasalazine Blue Thallium Tin Grey Vanadium Zidovudine Brown Zinc Grey
Source: Scully etal.(33)/with permission of International & American Associations for Dental Research.
22.3.9 Drug- Induced Gingival Enlargement
Drug- induced gingival enlargement is a well- documented adverse effect of certain medications(60). Many of these drugs are broadly categorised into three groups: calcium channel blockers, anticonvulsants and immunosuppressants(61).
This reaction is thought to occur in genetically susceptible patients in the presence of dental plaque or gingival inflammation(62), with painless overgrowth of both epithelium and connective tissues developing between one and three months after treatment has been instigated. The most common appearance is generalised fibrotic enlargement of the interdental papilla, usually affect­ing the anterior teeth before the posterior teeth. The hyperplastic tissue may encroach on the teeth, making oral hygiene difficult. The severity of the enlargement is proportionate to the duration of therapy, the drug dose, as well as the amount of bacterial plaque build- up.
The pathophysiology of drug- induced gingival enlargement appears to be common amongst these three categories of drugs, with the key feature being inhibition of cation influx (particu­larly sodium and calcium) into cells. The decrease of cation- dependent folic acid active trans­port within gingival fibroblasts results in a reduction of folic acid uptake by the cells. This alters matrix metalloproteinase metabolism and causes an inability to activate collagenase. This relative lack of collagenase results in increased accumulation of connective tissue and collagen(62).
Drugs most commonly associated with this type of reaction are listed in Table22.12.
Management of drug- induced gingival enlargement entails conservative measures such as consideration of altering the drug regimen and adequate plaque control in the first instance. In some cases, surgical debulking of the affected tissue may be indicated to facilitate oral hygiene or improve cosmesis.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
22.4 Hard Tissue Involvement
Table22.12  Drugs commonly associated withgingival enlargement.
Calcium channel blockers Amlodipine
Diltiazem Felodipine Lacidipine Nifedipine
Verapamil Anticonvulsants Phenytoin Immunosuppressants Cyclosporin
Source: Scully etal.(33)/with permission of International & American Associations for Dental Research.
22.4 Hard Tissue Involvement
22.4.1  Medication- Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ)
Medication- related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a well- documented adverse effect associ­ated with various bone modifying (such as bisphosphonates) and antiangiogenic drugs. These medications are commonly used to manage osteoporosis or malignancy. Drugs commonly associ­ated with MRONJ are listed in Table22.13.
The diagnosis of MRONJ requires:
393
1) Previous or current treatment with a bone- modifying agent or angiogenesis inhibitor;
2) Exposed bone or bone that can be probed through an intra- oral or extra- oral fistula in the maxil-
lofacial region that has persisted for longer than eight weeks; and
3) No history of radiation therapy of the jaws or metastatic disease of the jaws(64).
The pathogenesis of MRONJ is not clear; however, there are several hypotheses, which are as
follows:
Unique jaw characteristics: Medications implicated in MRONJ affect osteoclastic function within the entire skeletal system, and it is thought that several characteristics that are unique to the jaw bones predispose them to this condition.
High calcium concentration in the mandible, increasing the absorption of bisphosphonates
compared with other bones(65).
Relationship between the teeth and the jawbone provides a route of entry for microorganisms
from the oral cavity.
A major risk factor for the development of MRONJ is tooth extraction or dentoalveolar
surgery(65).
Bisphosphonates have been found to be more effective on craniofacial bone cells than elsewhere
in the body(66).
Mandibular mesenchymal stem cells proliferate at a higher rate than other bone stem cells(67).
Bisphosphonates induce reactive oxygen species production, which in turn inhibit proliferation
and migration of oral fibroblasts(68).
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
 
394
Table22.13  Drugs commonly associated withMRONJ.
Drug class Examples Indications
Bisphosphonates Oral–alendronate
and risedronate Intravenous–
Zoledronate
Monoclonal antibodies
Denosumab Bevacizumab Adalimumab
Osteoporosis, osteopenia, Paget’s disease, hypercalcaemia of malignancy, skeletal- related events of malignancy, bone metastases, multiple myeloma.
Osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease.
Infliximab Rituximab Romosozumab
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Sunitinib Imatinib Sorafenib
Haematological malignancy, renal cell carcinomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, soft tissue sarcomas, neuroendocrine tumours.
Panzopanib Axitinib Regorafenib Cabozantanib
Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors
Variant fusion proteins
Disease- modifying anti- rheumatic drugs
Everolimus Temsirolimus
Aflibercept Etanercept
Renal cell cancer, neuroendocrine cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma, solid organ transplantation.
Renal cell carcinoma, macular degeneration, macular oedema.
Methotrexate Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis,
inflammatory bowel disease.
Corticosteroids Prednisolone Numerous
Source: Adapted from King etal.(63).
Osteoblasts and osteoclast balance alteration in bone remodelling:
Bisphosphonate medications can increase apoptosis of osteoclasts. Antiresorptive medications
may inhibit differential and function of osteoclasts. These changes may lead to a reduction in bone resorption and remodelling(69).
Jaw osteoclasts are more sensitive to drugs implicated in MRONJ compared to osteoclasts in
long bones.
High levels of bisphosphonate accumulation in the bones impact the survival of osteoblasts and
their precursor cells(70).
RANK ligand inhibitors (e.g. denosumab) decrease bone resorption by blocking RANK/RANKL
interaction. The overall effect is inhibition of osteoclastic activity and reduction in the bone turnover(71).
Infection and the immune response:
Oral infections, including dental caries, periodontal disease, and periapical infections, increase
the risk of patients developing MRONJ(72, 73).
Dental extraction in areas of periodontal or periapical infection increases the risk of developing
MRONJ(74).
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
22.4 Hard Tissue Involvement
pH changes due to dentoalveolar infection or inflammation have been associated with develop-
ment of MRONJ(75).
Some nitrogen- containing bisphosphonates have been shown to impair neutrophil activity and
thus normal wound healing. Macrophages have also been shown to have reduced viability when exposed to these drugs(76, 77)
RANK ligand inhibitors have been shown to alter the function and survival of macrophages and
monocytes(78).
Angiogenesis:
Zoledronic acid has an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis, thus impairing healing after an oral
surgical procedure(79).
Antiangiogenic medications used to prevent cancer metastasis may result in ischaemia and pre-
dispose patients to MRONJ(80).
Soft tissue toxicity:
Several medications implicated in MRONK have been shown to inhibit oral fibroblasts and are
thought to predispose patients to mucosal breakdown and impaired wound healing(68).
Other factors:
Medical comorbidities and genetic factors are also thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of
MRONJ(81, 82).
395
Clinical staging has been used to categorise patients with MRONJ, ranging from no clinical evidence of necrotic bone but present with non- specific symptoms or clinical and radiographic findings (stage 0) to exposed and necrotic bone or a fistula that probes to bone in patients with pain, infection and one or more of the following: exposed necrotic bone extending beyond the region of alveolar bone, pathologic fracture, extraoral fistula, oral antral/oral nasal communica­tion, osteolysis extending to the inferior border of the mandible or sinus floor (stage 3).
Management ranges from conservative measures to extensive surgical intervention.
22.4.2 Tetracycline Staining
Tetracycline and its derivatives are well documented to cause intrinsic staining of dental hard tis­sues due to their affinity for calcified tissues. This results in binding of the drug to calcium, form­ing tetracycline–calcium orthophosphate complex. The quicker the rate of mineralisation of the tissues, the more tetracycline is deposited(83).
Tetracycline- stained calcified tissues exhibit yellow fluorescence when exposed to UV light. Minocycline has been associated with pigmentation of a number of tissues including skin, nails, teeth, bone, thyroid, sclera, conjunctiva and tongue. Affected calcified tissues do not fluoresce under UV light. Bone pigmentation is most noticeable beneath the alveolar mucosa of the maxilla and mandible, as well as the hard palate, with the incidence rising with prolonged exposure of thedrug. Up to 10% of patients taking this medication for over 12months develop black bone pigmentation in the oral cavity. The incidence rises to up to 20% after four years of continued exposure(83, 84).
Intrinsic discolouration and enamel hypoplasia of primary and permanent teeth occur if exposure to tetracycline occurs during tooth development. This can occur during utero as tetracycline may cross the placental barrier. The amount of tetracycline deposited in tooth substance depends on the dosage, duration of therapy and stage of tooth development. The distribution of tooth discolouration
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
 
396
corresponds with the stage of tooth development at the time of exposure. It is permanent, varying from yellow to grey or brown. Once the tooth has erupted and is exposed to light, the discolouration changes slowly from a fluorescent yellow to a non- fluorescent brown as a result of a light- induced oxidation product of tetracycline. Minocycline tooth staining appears as a band- like blue–grey discolouration of the tooth crown and a green or black appearance of the roots of the teeth.
There are three theories of the pathophysiology of minocycline discolouration, which are as
follows(85, 86):
1) Iron theory– Minocycline is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, chelating with iron to
form insoluble complexes which is thought to incite tooth discolouration.
2) Extrinsic theory–Minocycline is excreted in the gingival fluid in high concentrations and may
mineralise enamel. This allows the drug to discolour the enamel by diffusing through the pulp or affecting tooth development.
3) Intrinsic theory– Minocycline is bound to plasma proteins during absorption and then distrib-
uted to various body tissues. Tooth dentine, cementum, pulp and alveolar bone, by virtue of their high collagen content, have an affinity for minocycline, which then undergoes oxidisation and transformation to a pigmented metabolite.
Tetracycline and minocycline- induced tooth discolouration is permanent, and when the secondary dentition is affected, there maybe aesthetic and psychological concerns for which patients may seek dental advice.
22.5   Non- specific Reactions
22.5.1  Drug- Induced Taste Disorders (DITD)
Disturbance of taste has been reported to be associated with a large number of commonly prescribed medications. The precise pathophysiology of DITD is not completely understood, and there may be various between individuals which may be a result of polypharmacy, differences in dosage and genetic factors(87, 88).
A number of drugs have been reported to cause a metallic or bitter taste. These medications affect the taste buds after oral exposure, by dissolution in the saliva, gastrointestinal absorption or intravenous administration, or by accumulation within the taste buds when used over a protracted period of time. DITD may occur months–years after the initial exposure.
Some drugs are known to affect smell and taste signals for salt and sweet, resulting in the perception of a bitter or sour taste(88).
Drugs that affect the quantity and quality of saliva may also induce taste changes. Taste receptor cells are protected by saliva in the oral cavity, with this acting as a solvent and transport medium for taste substances(89). Many drugs that are known to cause oral dryness are also associated with DITD.
Drugs commonly associated with DITD are listed in Table22.14.
22.5.2  Drug- Related Halitosis
Drug- related halitosis has been reported to occur with a number of drugs including dimethyl sulfoxide, nitrates and nitrites, and penicillamine(87, 90, 91). Drugs commonly associated with halitosis are listed in Table22.15.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
22.5 Non-specific Reactions
Table22.14  Drugs implicated intaste disorders.
Acarbose Acetazolamide Allopurinol Amiloride Amitriptyline Amphetamines Amphotericin Amrinone Aspirin Atorvastatin Auranofin Aurothiomalate Azathioprine Azelastine Aztreonam Baclofen Biguanides Bleomycin Bretylium Calcitonin Captopril Carbamazepine Carbimazole Carboplatin Cetirizine Cephamandole Chlormezanone Cisplatin Clarithromycin Clidinium Clofibrate Clomipramine Cocaine Diazoxide Dicyclomine Diltiazem Dipyridamole Enalapril Ethambutol Ethionamide Etidronate Fluoxetine Flurazepam 5- Fluorouracil Fluvoxamine Glycopyrrolate Griseofulvin Hydrochlorothiazide Hydrocortisone Indomethacin Interferon gamma Iodine Isotretinoin L- dopa Levamisole Levodopa Lincomycin Lisinopril Lithium Losartan Lovastatin Methotrexate Methylthiouracil Metronidazole Nifedipine Nitroglycerin Omeprazole Penicillamine Pentamidine Phenformin Phenindione Phenylbutazone Phenytoin Procaine penicillin Propafenone Propranolol Propylthiouracil Quinapril Ramipril Rifabutin Rivastigmine Selegiline Sodium lauryl sulphate Spironolactone Sulfasalazine Terbinafine Tetracycline Thiamazole Tocainide Topiramate Trandolapril Triazolam Venlafaxine Zopiclone
397
Source: Scully etal.(33)/with permission of International & American Associations for Dental Research.
Table22.15  Drugs commonly associated withhalitosis.
Chloral hydrate Paraldehyde Cysteamine Penicillamine (penicillin) Dimethyl sulfoxide 3 Phenothiazine Disulfiram Suplatast tosilate Nitrates and nitrites (isosorbide dinitrate)
Source: Adapted from Torzten etal.(90).
Dimethyl sulfoxide may cause a garlic- like odour and taste in the mouth. This is transported
from the blood into the alveolar air, then into the breath(92).
Drugs containing nitrates are reduced to nitrites by anaerobic bacteria residing in the crypts at the tongue base in the process of respiration. Further reduction to nitric oxide and reaction with foul- smelling volatile organosulfur compounds contribute to halitosis(93, 94).
Penicillamine, a degradation product of penicillin, is structurally similar to the sulphur­containing amino acid cysteine. Both penicillamine and cysteine can be degraded by microbes within the biofilm on the tongue, with this reaction raising the pH and favouring growth of Gram- negative bacteria. Enzymes such as serine protease, which is involved in the putrefaction process, are activated and contribute to halitosis(95).
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH