Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_842_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Preface
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1: Clinical Anatomy of the Groin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
- •2.1.2 Contralateral Side
- •References
- •1.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1.1 General
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •Journals
- •Books
- •Miscellaneous
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Patient-Related Factors
- •6.3 Hernia-Related Factors
- •6.4 Surgeon-Related Factors
- •6.5 Anesthesia-Related Factors
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •6.9 Anesthesia-Related Factors
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 North American Trial
- •7.3 UK Trial
- •7.4 Long-Term Follow-Up
- •7.5 Summary
- •References
- •8: Perioperative Management of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •8.1.2 Dynamic Inguinal Ultrasound (DIUS)
- •Results
- •8.1.3 Treatment Plan
- •8.3.2 Perioperative Antibiotics
- •8.3.3 Thromboembolic Prophylaxis
- •Therapeutic Approach
- •Physical Activities
- •Heparin
- •Duration of VTE-Prophylaxis
- •8.3.8 Postoperative Pain Control
- •8.3.9 Discharge Management
- •8.4.1 Clinical Examination
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.1.2 Instruments
- •9.1.3 Operative Room Setup
- •Diagnostic Round View
- •9.2.4 Special Technical Remarks
- •Cord Lipoma
- •9.2.6 Comments
- •9.2.7 Peritoneal Closure
- •9.2.8 Port-Site Closure
- •References (in parentheses graduation of evidence)
- •10.1 Complications
- •10.1.3 Ad 3: Bowel Lesion
- •10.1.4 Ad 4. Urinary Bladder Injury
- •10.1.5 Ad 5. Hematoma/Seroma
- •10.1.7 Ad 7. Wound/Mesh Infection
- •10.1.8 Ad 8: Bowel Obstruction
- •10.1.10 Ad 10. Trocar Hernias
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •References
- •11.1 History
- •11.2 Standard Technique [10–13]
- •11.2.1 Patient Preparation
- •11.2.2 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •11.2.3 Thromboembolic Prophylaxis
- •11.2.4 Patient Positioning
- •11.2.5 Anesthesia
- •11.2.6 Team Positioning
- •11.2.7 Instruments
- •11.2.9 Dissection
- •11.2.10 Mesh Placement
- •11.3.1 Bilateral Inguinal Hernias
- •11.3.2 Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
- •11.3.3 Scrotal Hernias
- •11.3.4 Incarcerated Hernias
- •References
- •12: Technique Total Extraperitoneal Patch Plasty (TEP): Complications, Prevention, Education, and Preferences
- •12.1 Intraoperative Complications
- •12.1.3 Bleeding
- •12.1.7 Bladder Injury
- •12.1.8 Bowel Injury
- •12.1.10 Conversion
- •12.2 Postoperative Complications
- •12.2.1 Hematoma/Bleeding
- •12.2.2 Seroma
- •References
- •13: Comparison TAPP vs. TEP: Which Technique Is Better?
- •14.2.1 Preoperative Considerations
- •14.3.1 Post-op Care
- •13.3.2 Learning Curve
- •14: Complex Inguinal Hernias
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Inguinoscrotal Hernias
- •14.4.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 3
- •Level 5
- •14.6.1 Level 3
- •14.7.1 Level 3
- •14.7.2 Level 5
- •Level 5
- •14.8 Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Level II
- •Level IIC
- •14.9 Femoral Hernias
- •14.10 Obturator Hernia
- •14.11.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 4
- •Grade C
- •14.12.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 3
- •Grade D
- •14.13 Bilateral Hernia
- •14.13.1 Evidence [3]
- •References
- •15: Mesh Technology at Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •15.1 Biocompatibility
- •15.1.1 Synthetic Nonabsorbable
- •15.1.2 Synthetic Absorbable
- •15.1.3 Biological
- •15.2 Size
- •15.3 Slit: Yes or No?
- •15.4 Fixation (René H. Fortelny)
- •Recurrence
- •15.4.2 Glue Fixation
- •Permanent Versus Nonpermanent Fixation (Staple/Tack Versus Glue)
- •Recurrence
- •15.4.4 Self–Fixating Mesh
- •15.5 Summary
- •References
- •Biocompatibility
- •Fixation (Rene Fortelny)
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.2 Postoperative Activity
- •16.3.2 Postoperative Activity
- •References
- •17: Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP)
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.5 Diagnostics
- •17.14 Selective Neurectomy
- •17.15 Triple Neurectomy
- •17.18 Mesh Removal
- •17.19 Conclusion
- •References
- •18: Costs
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.6.4 Non-commercial Mesh
- •References
- •19: Sportsmen Hernia
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.3 How Is This Entity Diagnosed?
- •19.3.1 Physical Examination
- •19.3.2 Ultrasound
- •19.4 How Is This Entity Treated?
- •19.4.1 Conservative Treatment
- •19.4.2 Surgery
- •References
- •20.1.1 Introduction
- •Operative Time
- •Chronic Pain
- •Recurrences
- •20.1.4 Clinical Practice
- •References
- •21.2.1 Access Devices
- •21.2.2 Telescope
- •21.2.3 Instruments
- •21.3.1 Indications
- •21.3.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •21.4 Operation Theater Layout
- •21.5 Surgical Techniques
- •21.5.1 Reduced Port TEP
- •21.5.2 Reduced Port TAPP
- •References
- •22: Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall: What Is Important for Laparoscopic Surgery?
- •22.1.1 Introduction
- •22.1.2 The Body Wall
- •22.1.4 Topographic Situation
- •22.2 The Surgical View
- •22.2.1 Introduction
- •22.2.2 Abdominal Entry
- •22.2.3 Hernia Location
- •22.2.4 Fixation
- •22.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •Absolute Contraindications
- •Relative Contraindications
- •References
- •Indications for Laparoscopic Surgery: Limitations
- •24.1 Part I
- •24.2 Part II
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •References
- •26.1 Part I
- •References
- •27: Standard Technique Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral and Incisional Hernia
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.3 Pneumoperitoneum
- •27.6 Dissection Techniques
- •27.6.1 Adhesiolysis
- •27.7.1 Introduction
- •27.7.2 Problem
- •27.7.3 Method
- •27.7.4 Results
- •27.7.5 Discussion
- •27.7.6 Conclusion
- •27.8.1 Introduction
- •27.8.2 Indication
- •27.8.3 Technique
- •27.8.4 Discussion
- •27.8.5 Conclusion
- •27.9.1 Mesh Sizing
- •27.9.2 Mesh Manipulation
- •27.9.3 Mesh Fixation
- •References
- •28.1 Introduction
- •References
- •29: Complications, Pitfalls and Prevention of Complications of Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair and Comparison to Open Repair
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Bowel Injury
- •29.3 Infection
- •29.3.1 Patient-Related Risk Factors
- •29.3.2 Surgery-Related Risk Factors
- •29.4 Mesh Infection
- •29.5 Seroma
- •29.5.1 Risk Factors
- •29.6 Pain
- •29.7 Recurrence
- •29.7.1 Risk Factors
- •29.8 Miscellaneous Complications
- •References
- •30.2 Discussion
- •References
- •31.4 Parastomal Hernias
- •31.5 Obese Patients
- •References
- •Recurrence After Previous Open Repair
- •Recurrence After Previous Laparoscopic Repair
- •Giant Hernias: Loss of Domain
- •Parastomal Hernias
- •Obese Patients
- •References
- •33.1 Summary
- •References
- •34.1 Introduction
- •34.2 Operative Technique
- •34.3 Preliminary Results
- •34.4 Discussion
- •34.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •35.1 Introduction
- •35.2 Laparoscopic Technique
- •35.3 Evidence
- •35.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •References
- •37.4 Diagnostic Work-Up
- •37.6 Perioperative Management
- •References
- •38.2 Division of Short Gastric Vessels
- •38.4 Cruroplasty
- •38.5 Fundoplication
- •38.6 Mesh Augmentation
- •References
- •39.1 Suture Versus Mesh Repair
- •References
- •40.1.1 Introduction
- •40.1.2 Intraoperative Complications
- •40.1.6 Laparoscopic Approach
- •40.1.8 Postoperative Care
- •40.2.1 Comments
- •40.2.2 Comments
- •40.2.3 Comments
- •References
- •Praxis in Detail, “How I do It”, Daily Routine Tips and Tricks
- •Is What I am Doing Every Day Evidence Based?
- •41: Complex Hiatal Hernias
- •41.1 Upside-Down Stomach
- •41.1.2 Mesh Augmentation
- •Hiatal Surface Area (HSA)
- •Hiatus Reconstruction
- •Fundoplication
- •Follow-Up
- •41.1.4 Summary
- •41.2 Short Esophagus
- •41.2.1 Introduction
- •Types [38]
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •41.2.3 Treatment Options Include
- •Open
- •Laparoscopic
- •Intrathoracic Fundoplication
- •Esophagectomy
- •Collis Procedure
- •41.2.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Upside-Down Stomach
- •Short Esophagus
- •42.1 Recurrent Hiatus Hernia
- •42.1.1 Introduction
- •42.1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •42.1.3 Management
- •References
- •Recurrent Hiatus Hernia
- •Hiatal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients
- •References
- •44.1 Introduction
- •44.2 Indications
- •44.3 Preoperative Preparation
- •44.3.1 SILS Hiatal Hernia Repair
- •Operation Theater Layout
- •Instrumentation
- •Single Incision Multiple Fascial Puncture Method
- •Homemade Glove Port Method
- •Multichannel Port Method
- •44.5.1 Robotic Hiatus Hernia Repair
- •Operation Theater Layout
- •Instrumentation
- •44.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •45.1 Introduction
- •45.2 Training Center
- •45.2.1 Teaching Faculty
- •45.2.2 Interactive Classroom Teaching
- •45.2.4 Animal and Cadaveric Laboratory for Training
- •45.2.9 Learning Curve
- •45.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •46.1.2 Hemodynamic Changes
- •46.3 Anesthesia Practice
- •46.7 Summary
- •References
- •Index

Standard Technique Laparoscopic Repair ofVentral andIncisional Hernia
301
27
17. Chelala E, Barake H, Estievenart J, Dessily M, Charara F,
Alle L.Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience. Hernia.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. online
June 2015. (level 2C).
18. Earle D, Roth S, Saber A, Haggerty S, Bradley JF III,
Fanelli R, Price R, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, SAGES
Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. http://www.sages.org.
(level 5).
19. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE.Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy in 100
patients. Am J Surg. 2000;180(3):193–7. (level 4).
20. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV, Bellanger DE, Rhynes VK.Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy: our initial 100 patients. Hernia. 2001;5:41–5. (level 4).
21. LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE, et al. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons
learned from 200 patients. Hernia. 2003;7:118–24.
(level 4).
22. LeBlanc KA.Incisional hernia repair: laparoscopic techniques. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):1073–9. Review (level
2C).
23. Chelala E, Thomas M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M,
Alle JL.The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh
xation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: midterm
analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(3):391–5.
(level 3).
24. Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL.The
suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh xation in
ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia. 2003;7(4):191–6. (level 5).
25. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, Fabian M, Ferzli
GS, Fortelny RH, Köckerling F, Kukleta JF, LeBlanc K,
Lomanto D, Misra MC, Bansal VK, Morales-Conde S,
Ramshaw B, Reinpold W, Rim S, Rohr M, Schrittwieser
R, Simon T, Smietanski M, Stechemesser B, Timoney M,
Chowbey P. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of
ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))—part 1. Surg
Endosc. 2014;28:2–29.
26. Cuccurullo D, Piccoli M, Agresta F, Magnone S,
Corcione F, Sancanelli V, Melotti G.Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the rst Italian consensus conference. Hernia.
2013;17(5):557–66.
27. Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, Ceccarelli G,
Antinori A, Ansaloni L, Olmi S, Ferrari GC, Cuccurullo
D, Baccari P, Agresta F, Vettoretto N, Piccoli M.Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed consensus
development conference. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2463–
84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4293-8.
28. Kukleta J, Chelala E, Chowbey. “Bridging”, “augmentation” and reconstruction of the linea alba: closure of
the defect before IPOM. Guidelines for laparoscopic
treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall
hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-part
1. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00464-013-3170-6.
29. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLead RS, Okrainec A.Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing
open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia
repair with mesh. Br J Surg. 2009;96(8):851–6. (level
1a).
30. Arita NA, Nguyen MT, Nguyen DH, Berger RL, Lew
DF, Suliburk JT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK. Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site
infections for all ventral hernias. Surg Endosc.
2015;29(7):1769–80. (level 4).
31. Sajid MS, B okhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK.Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2009;197(1):64–72.
(level 1a).
32. Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Mathews BD, Brunt
LM.Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg
Endosc. 2007;21(3):378–86. (level 2A).
33. LeBlanc KA.Incisional hernia repair: laparoscopic techniques. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):1073–9. (level 5).
34. Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK. Transcutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg.
2012;37(1):42–51. (level 4).
35. Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kaol S, Liang
MK. Primary facial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg.
2014;38(12):3097–104. (level 2A).
36. Franklin M, Dorman J, Glass J, Balli J, Gonzalez J.Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc.
1998;8(4):294–9. (level 4).
37. Liang MK, Subramanian A, Awad SS. Laparoscopic
transcutaneous closure of central defects in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc
Percutan Tech. 2012;22(2):66–70. (level 4).
38. Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK, Linn J, Noria S, Zagol
B, Mikami DJ. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair:
does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh
decrease recurrence? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1264–8.
(level 2C–3).
39. Zeichen MS, Lujan HJ, Mata WN, Maciel VH, Lee D,
Jorge I, Plasencia G, Gomez E, Hernandez AM. Closure versus non-closure of hernia defect during
laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh. Hernia.
2013;17(5):589–96. (level 4).
40. Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg
Endosc. 2011;25(5):1452–7. (level 4).
41. Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Selber JC, Nguyen
AT, Clemens MW, Liu J, Butler CE.Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged
mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am
Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):999–1009. (level 4).
42. Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K. Closure versus nonclosure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and
incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.
Surg Today. 2015;46(7):764–73. [Epub ahead of print]
(level 2A).
43. LeBlanc KA.Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia
repair: complications—how to avoid and handle. Hernia. 2004;8:323–31. (level 4).

302
K. A. LeBlanc et al.
27
44. LeBlanc KA.Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: are
transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(4):508–13. (level 3a).
45. Wassenaar EB, Shoenmeckers EJP, Raymakers JTF,
Rakic S.Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505
repairs. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:825–32. (level 4).
46. Hauters P, desmet J, Gherardi D, Dewaele S, Poilvache H, Malvaux P.Assessment of predictive factors
for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
using a bridging technique. Surg Endosc. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0.
47. Theodoropoulou K, Lethaby D, Hill J, Gupta S, Bradpiece H.Laparoscopic hernia repair: a two-port technique. JSLS. 2010;14:103–5. (level 3b).
48. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Shuaib S, El-Hasani S.Prevention of trocar site incisional hernia following laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair. JSLS. 2008;12:206–9. (level 3B).
49. Perry KA, Millikan KW, Huang WW, Myers JA. A novel
approach to extraction of incarcerated omentum and
mesh insertion in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Surg Endosc. 2008;22:798–801. (level 5).
50. Perrone JM, Soper NJ, Eagon JC, Klingensmith ME, Aft
RL, Frisella MM, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcomes
and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia
repair. Surgery. 2005;138:708–15. discussion 715-706
(level 4).
51. Agarwal BB, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC.Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: innovative anatomical closure, mesh
insertion without 10-mm transmyofascial port, and
atraumatic mesh xation: a preliminary experience of a
new technique. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:900–5. (level 3B).
52. Nimeri AA, Brunt LM.Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair:
5-mm port technique and alternative mesh insertion
method. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:708–10. (level 4).
53. Carter PR, LeBlanc KA.Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. In: Kingsnorth AN, LeBlanc KA,
editors. Management of abdominal wall hernias. 4th
ed. NewYork: Springer; 2013. p.345–62. (level 5).
54. Carlson MA, Petersen A.Technique for the insertion of
large mesh during minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1243–4. (level 5).
55. Miller KS, Carey SD, Rodriguez FJ, Smoot RT. Complications and their management. In: LeBlanc K, editor.
Laparoscopic hernia surgery. London: Arnold; 2003.
p.161–9. (level 4).
56. Wassenaar EB, Shoenmeckers EJP, Raymakers JTF,
Rakic S.Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505
repairs. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:825–32. (level 5).
57. Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez
A.Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an
11-year experience. Hernia. 2004;8(1):23–7. (level 4).
58. Ballem N, Parikh R, Berber E, Siperstein A.Laparoscopic
versus open ventral hernia repairs: 5 year recurrence
rates. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1935–40. (level 4).
59. Topart P, Ferrand L, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac'h P. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with the Goretex
Dualmesh: long-term results and review of the literature. Hernia. 2005;9(4):348–52. (level 4).
60. Berger D, Bientzle M, Müller A. Postoperative complications after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Inci-
dence and treatment. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1720–3.
(level 4).
61. Bingener J, Buck L, Richards M, Michalek J, Schwesinger
W, Sirinek K.Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs
open ventral hernia repair. Arch Surg. 2007;142(6):562–
7. (level 4).
62. McKinlay RD, Park A. Laparoscopic ventral incisional
hernia repair: a more eective alternative to conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(6):670–4. (level 4).
63. Yavuz N, Ipek T, As A, Kapan M, Eyuboglu E, Erguney
S. Laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias: our experience in 150 patients. J Laparoendosc
Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15(6):601–5. (level 4).
64. Chelala E, Thoma M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle
JL.The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh xation
in ventral and incisional hernia repair: mid- term analysis
of 400 cases. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(3):391–5. (level 4).
65. Palanivelu C, Jani KV, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R,
Madhankumar MV, Malladi VK.Laparoscopic sutured
closure with mesh reinforcement of incisional hernias.
Hernia. 2007;11:223–8. (level 4).
66. Carbajo MA, del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, de la Cuesta C,
Martin F, Toledano M, Perna C, Vaquero C.Laparoscopic
treatment of ventral abdominal wall hernias: preliminary results in 100 patients. JSLS. 2000;4:141–5. (level 4).
67. Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Bo B, Farsi M, Martini F, Rossi M,
Bernini M, Moretti R.Comparison of laparoscopic and
open repair for primary ventral hernias. Surg Laparosc
Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(4):341–4. (level 4).
68. Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M,
Vashistha A.Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;10(2):79–84. (level 4).
69. Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Zografakis JG, Madan AK,
Moore RE.Minimally invasive incisional herniorrhaphy:
a review of 208 cases. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(10):1488–
91. (level 4).
70. Kirshtein B, Lantsberg L, Avinoach E, Bayme M, Mizrahi
S.Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. Surg
Endosc. 2002;16(12):1717–9. (level 4).
71. Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano A, Bustos M, Martín J,
Morales-Mendez S.Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
without sutures–double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40
months. Int Surg. 2005;90(3 Suppl):S56–62. (level 4).
72. Moreno-Egea A, Cartagena J, Vicente JP, Carrillo A,
Aguayo JL.Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair as a
day surgery procedure: audit of 127 consecutive cases
in a university hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18(3):267–71. (level 4).
73. Olmi S, Erba L, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E.Prospective clinical study of laparoscopic treatment
of incisional and ventral hernia using a composite
mesh: indications, complications and results. Hernia.
2006;10(3):243–7. (level 3).
74. Harth KC, Rosen MJ.Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):342–6. (level 3).
75. Harth KC, Rose J, Delaney CP, Blatnik JA, Halaweish I,
Rosen MJ.Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2865–
70. (level 3).

Standard Technique Laparoscopic Repair ofVentral andIncisional Hernia
303
27
76. Albright E, Diaz D, Davenport D, Roth JS.The component separation technique for hernia repair: a comparison of open and endoscopic techniques. Am Surg.
2011;77(7):839–43. (level 3).
77. Giurgius M, Bendure L, Davenport DL, Roth JS. The
endoscopic component separation technique for
hernia repair results in reduced morbidity compared
to the open component separation technique. Hernia.
2012;16(1):47–51. (level 3).
78. Bachman SL, Ramaswamy A, Ramshaw BJ. Early
results of midline hernia repair using a minimally
invasive component separation technique. Am Surg.
2009;75(7):572–7. (level 3).
79. Parker M, Bray JM, Puke JM, Asbun HJ, Smith CD, Bowers SP. Preliminary experience and development of
an algorithm for the optimal use of the laparoscopic
component separation technique for myofascial
advancement during ventral incisional hernia repair.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(5):405–10.
(level 4).
80. Azoury SC, Dhanasopon AP, Hui X, Tuaha SH, De
La Cruz C, Liao C, Lovins M, Nguyen HT. Endoscopic
component separation for laparoscopic and open
ventral hernia repair: a single institutional comparison of outcomes and review of the technique. Hernia.
2014;18(5):637–45. (level 3).
81. Switzer NJ, Dykstra MA, Gill RS, Lim S, Lester E, de Gara
C, Shi X, Birch DW, Kamali S.Endoscopic versus open
component separation: systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):787–95. (level 3).

Aftercare andPain
Management
JulianeBingener-Casey andRalfM. Wilke
28.1 Introduction – 306
28.1.1 How IDo It – 306
28.1.2 Is What IamDoing Evidence Based? – 308
References – 309
305
28
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
R. Bittner et al. (eds.), Laparo-endoscopic Hernia Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_28

306
J. Bingener-Casey and R. M. Wilke
28
28.1 Introduction
In many areas of the United States, laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair is an outpatient surgical
procedure. As a matter of fact, the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services considers laparoscopic ventral hernia repair an outpatient procedure, and the regulatory framework and nancial
reimbursements are matching that expectation.
Within this framework, it is important to work
with patients on the shared goal of swi recovery.
Traditionally, perioperative teams focused on
understanding the operative indication and the
patient’s cardiovascular limitations for anesthesia.
With the introduction of the enhanced recovery
pathways in surgery, the surgical community is
more deliberately sharing physical and cognitive
preparation for surgery with our patients’ before
entering the operating room.
28.1.1 How IDo It
It is important for the patient to understand before
surgery that they will be an outpatient and how
their postoperative care and recovery can progress at home. In addition, it is important that the
remainder of the perioperative team (nurses, desk
sta, anesthesia team members, residents, physician assistants, pharmacists) also share and support
this expectation to facilitate a successful pathway.
To set the patient on a path for an outpatient
surgical course, we have applied the components
of enhanced recovery aer surgery (ERAS) to
the laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. A discussion of postoperative pain control is part of the
preoperative evaluation. We ask the patients to
identify a friend or family member as a postoperative caregiver for the rst night at home aer
surgery and to remain physically active and well
hydrated. Carbohydrate loading can be a component of the preoperative diet the night before
surgery. For adult patients, we limit solid food
aer midnight on the day of surgery; however,
clear beverages up until 2h prior to surgery are
encouraged. ese could be electrolyte- and
carbohydrate- containing drinks or black coee
for habitual coee drinkers to avoid dehydration
and caeine withdrawal headaches. We do not
routinely employ a bowel preparation for ventral
hernia repair, even if dissection of colon from the
abdominal wall is anticipated.
On the day of surgery, the patient receives
preemptive oral pain medication with a sip of
water in the holding area prior to induction of
anesthesia, usually 1000 mg of acetaminophen/
paracetamol. A COX inhibitor could also be used.
I personally nd the acetaminophen to be easy
to administer on a routine basis because of the
safety prole and the few contraindications. e
preemptive pain medication is ordered as part of
our electronic surgical scheduling system, along
with preoperative antibiotics and pharmacologic thromboembolic prophylaxis. Unless there
is a special requirement, patients do not receive
benzodiazepine premedication. Patients are prewarmed with hot air warming gowns in the holding area.
At the pre-procedural brieng, we review our
plan for local anesthetics, ketorolac administration, and postoperative nausea prophylaxis with
the team to ensure medications are available.
Aer induction of anesthesia, we do not routinely
place bladder catheters to prevent urinary tract
infection and unintentional urethral injury. If the
anticipated procedural length is less than 4h, we
ask the patients to use the restroom just prior to
their entry into the OR. As the ERAS protocol
involves limiting intravenous uids during anesthesia to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting, a full bladder at the end of the case is rarely
observed. Patients with extensive bladder involvement in a ventral hernia may require a bladder
catheter which is usually removed before extubation. For any patient with a le upper quadrant
Veress needle entry, we will place an oral gastric
tube that is removed at the end of the case. During
the prepping of the operative procedure, attention is paid to maintenance of normothermia
with limited skin exposure, room pre-warming,
and heated insuation gas. If the patient appears
hypothermic, a plastic adhesive may be placed
over the operative eld.
During the procedure, we administer local
anesthetic to the trocar incision sites and the sites
of any transfascial sutures and tacks. Currently, we
use a mixture of 30cc of 0.25% bupivacaine (~4h
halime) with 20cc long-acting liposomal bupivacaine (halime 48h) for a total of 50cc of local
anesthetic to be applied to the abdominal wall. At
the end of the procedure, if the patient has no contraindication to nonsteroidal anti- inammatory
drugs (NSAIDS), we will ask our anesthesia colleagues to administer 15 mg ketorolac i.v. prior

Aftercare andPain Management
307
28
to the patient being awakened. Aer wound closure, occlusive, water-proof surgical dressings are
applied (Band-Aid plus clear plastic tape). We
place an abdominal binder for patient comfort
as the patient is transferred from the operating
room table to the bed. If in the recovery room
pain is not well controlled, an additional 15 mg
ketorolac i.v. may be given if the patient has no
contraindications. Alternatively (or in addition)
intravenous acetaminophen is used if more than
6h have elapsed since the preoperative dose and
the patient is not yet able to take oral medications.
Intravenous or oral narcotics may be necessary if
pain control is still not adequate.
Aer the immediate postoperative recovery,
the patient will return to an outpatient surgical oor. e nurses will assist the patient with
ambulation and oral intake. Oral intake will be
resumed within hours aer anesthesia starting
with liquids and advancing to a general diet as
the patient tolerates. In the postoperative period,
we recommend to go easy on any foods that will
create signicant bloating or constipation. We do
not place prophylactic nasogastric tubes in the
postoperative period relying on early postoperative oral intake to stimulate gastrointestinal tract
activity.
In the postoperative period, we will rely heavily on oral medication. As the patient awakens,
we prescribe scheduled nonnarcotic pain medication, using acetaminophen- and ibuprofen-based
medication as much as possible. We will administer acetaminophen every 6h on a scheduled basis
for the next 48h, as well as ibuprofen or other
NSAID-based medication on a scheduled basis
(unless there is a contraindication). e patient
receives a schedule with the times of administration from the perioperative period and for the
next 24h so that it is easy to keep track (see table
below). For example, if a 50-year-old, otherwise
healthy patient received acetaminophen 1000mg
at 7:00am in the preoperative holding area and
ketorolac 15mg i.v. at 10:00am at the conclusion
of the procedure, followed by an oral narcotic at
11:00 am, the patient would receive a schedule
similar to this:
Medication 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00
Acetaminophen
1000mg p.o. (q 6h)
Ibuprofen
600mg p.o. (q 6h)
Narcotic pain
medication q 3–4h,
parentheses indicate
as needed
Should a patient not be able to take nonsteroidal anti-inammatory medication, we will use
scheduled tramadol, a low level narcotic, for the
rst 48 h. is medication would then replace
ibuprofen/NSAIDS in the postoperative instructions. In addition to the non-opioid medication,
we will oer oral narcotics (non-acetaminophen/
NSAID containing) as needed. Patients with signicant muscle cramping may also benet from a
benzodiazepine for muscle relaxation. Other
adjunct measures include warm blankets, music,
massage (e.g., foot massage for relaxation), and
distraction.
Of note, it is important to remember that pain
perception is dierent by gender and age. In general, patients less than 40years of age will have a
x x
x x
(X) (X)
need for a higher dose of pain medication than
patients older than 40. Women will frequently
need more pain medication than men. us, in
my practice I expect to prescribe more narcotic
pain medication for a woman less than 40years of
age who is undergoing a hernia repair than for a
man over the age of 70.
Intolerance of a certain pain medication (e.g.,
nightmares or nausea/vomiting aer a certain
narcotic) may prompt the patient not to take the
prescribed medication only to then be readmitted
to the hospital for poor pain control. It is important to discuss preoperatively which pain medications may have been successful for the patient
in other circumstances. If a patient has had good
experience with hydromorphone hydrochloride

308
J. Bingener-Casey and R. M. Wilke
28
versus another opioid, we try to accommodate
this. Matching the patients’ preferred pain medication (within a reasonable framework – not to
support an addiction) is important to achieving
good pain control and patient satisfaction [1].
Again, we will reinforce that some of the recovery
will indeed happen at home and that the patient
is functional although limited by postoperative
pain. e patient will return home with a phone
number where they can reach the team 24/7 with
any questions or problems.
With this regimen, we have signicantly
decreased our overall need for narcotic pain medication for patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair [2]. In turn, this was associated
with reduction in the length of stay (LOS) and the
number of postoperative complications within
30days postoperatively as measured by the ACSNSQIP (American College of Surgeons National
Surgical Quality Improvement Program) data.
e GI function returns earlier. We aggressively
pursue a bowel regimen to counteract the narcotic
side eects on the GI tract. We recommend the
patient take a laxative, not just a stool soener, for
the duration of the time that they require narcotic
pain medication, including tramadol. e patient
can shower on postoperative day 1 and is asked to
remove the surgical dressing 48h postoperatively
at home, following CDC guidelines.
Aer the patient is discharged, a member of
the team will call the patient within 48 to 72h
aer discharge to check on their wellbeing. e
postprocedural phone calls oen are helpful in
discovering slow GI recovery, and medication can
be adjusted or additional pain medication (such
as a lidocaine cutaneous patch) provided.
28.1.2 Is What IamDoing Evidence
Based?
Guidelines and studies specic to laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair are few. Much of our current care pathway is based on enhanced recovery pathway publications in colorectal surgery,
starting with the concepts as outlined by Kehlet
and Morgenson in 1999 [3]. e components
of ERAS are preoperative, intraoperative, and
postoperative. Preoperatively, patient education,
uid and carbohydrate loading, avoiding bowel
preparation, and prolonged fasting are included
as well as antibiotic and thromboembolic pro-
phylaxis. Intraoperatively, avoiding uid overload
and maintaining normothermia are important.
Drains and tubes are limited, eective analgesia
begins before induction. Postoperatively, eective
non-opioid oral analgesia, early oral nutrition,
stimulation of gut motility, and preventing nausea
and vomiting are included.
Central to the enhanced recovery for patients
undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
is postoperative pain control [1, 4]. A review by
Rawal [5] described acetaminophen/NSAIDS
with inltrative local anesthetics as the most
eective components of multimodal analgesia
for many surgical procedures. For laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair, this is supported specically
by small randomized trials by Mitchell, Bellows,
Gough, and Fields [4, 6–8]. Opioids will oen still
be necessary but should be given orally to maximize steady pain control. Intravenous pain medication, including patient-controlled analgesia, not
infrequently leads to peaks and valleys in the pain
curve and results in higher total opioid doses. In
addition, elastic abdominal binders may aid in
patient comfort [9, 10] as may lidocaine dermal
patch application [11].
e other ERAS components have been nicely
summarized in Steenhagen’s 2016 [12] review for
abdominal surgery. Below we highlight several
factors included in this review that are important
for patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair:
5 Preoperative personalized patient counsel-
ing is an independent risk factor for ERAS
success [13].
5 e entire team needs to be on the same page
[14–17].
5 Avoiding long starvation and administration
of carbohydrate uid minimize postoperative
insulin resistance [18–20], which is associ-
ated with increased morbidity, mortality, and
length of hospital stay [21]. A Cochrane data-
base review found that aspiration pneumoni-
tis was not reported in any patients; a small
reduction in LOS however was found [22].
5 Early postoperative feeding reduces the risk
of infection and LOS [23–26].
5 Postoperative laxatives counteract the opioid
side eects and may promote early bowel
function [27].
5 Routine nasogastric decompression leads to
increased pulmonary complications, delayed
return of GI function, and longer LOS [28].

Aftercare andPain Management
309
28
We have published the data resulting from our
eorts integrating evidence-based enhanced
recovery concepts for abdominal surgery in our
laparoscopic ventral hernia practice in 2015 [2].
e eorts resulted in a decreased LOS, decreased
use of narcotics, reduced complication rate, and a
cost reduction of 10% for the health system. e
eort to introduce the concepts in our system was
accomplished over time and involved conversations with many practitioners and patients. We
continue to evaluate and ne-tune the pathways
as new pain medication and evidence become
available.
References
1. Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B,
Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J. Pain, quality of life
and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Hernia. 2009;13(1):13–21.
2. Leonard J, Hieken TJ, Hussein M, Harmsen WS, Sawyer
M, Osborn J, Bingener J.Delineation of factors associated with prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic
ventral hernia repair leads to a clinical pathway and
improves quality of care. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):
1614–8.
3. Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after
open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation
programme. Br J Surg. 1999;86(2):227–30.
4. Bellows CF, Berger DH.Inltration of suture sites with
local anesthesia for management of pain following
laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized trial. JSLS. 2006;10(3):345–50.
5. Rawal N.Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(3):160–71.
6. Mitchell A, van Zanten SV, Inglis K, Porter G.A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus
ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus
caeine after outpatient general surgery. J Am Coll
Surg. 2008;206(3):472–9.
7. Gough AE, Chang S, Reddy S, Ferrigno L, Zerey M,
Grotts J, Yim S, Thoman SD.Periprosthetic anesthetic
for postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg.
2015;150(9):835–40.
8. Fields AC, Gonzalez DO, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Zhang LP,
Divino CM.Laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized controlled
trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):462–9.
9. Rothman JP, Gunnarsson U, Bisgaard T. Abdominal
binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery - a systematic
review. Dan Med J. 2014;61(11):A4941.
10. Christoersen MW, Olsen BH, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard
T.Randomized clinical trial on the postoperative use of
an abdominal binder after laparoscopic umbilical and
epigastric hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19(1):147–53.
11. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Rao AJ, Itawi EA, Martinez
RL.Early experience with lidocaine patch for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic ventral hernia
repair. Int J Surg. 2009;7(1):36–8.
12. Steenhagen E. Enhanced recovery after surgery: it’s
time to change practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(1):
18–29.
13. Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor
JC, McLeod RS.Adoption of enhanced recovery after
surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length
of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):442–50.
14. Nadler A, Pearsall EA, Victor JC, Aarts MA, Okrainec A,
McLeod RS.Understanding surgical residents’ postoperative practices and barriers and enablers to the
implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guideline. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):632–8.
15. Gillissen F, Ho C, Maessen JM, Winkens B, Teeuwen
JH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Dejong CH. Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery
program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in
The Netherlands. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1082–93.
16. McLeod RS, Aarts MA, Chung F, Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS,
Conn LG, McCluskey S, McKenzie M, Morningstar B,
Nadler A, Okrainec A, Pearsall EA, Sawyer J, Siddique N,
Wood T.Development of an enhanced recovery after
surgery guideline and implementation strategy based
on the knowledge-to-action cycle. Ann Surg.
2015;262(6):1016–25.
17. Homann H, Kettelhack C. Fast-track surgery--conditions and challenges in postsurgical treatment: a review
of elements of translational research in enhanced
recovery after surgery. Eur Surg Res. 2012;49(1):
24–34.
18. Nygren J, Soop M, Thorell A, Efendic S, Nair KS,
Ljungqvist O.Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration reduces postoperative insulin resistance. Clin
Nutr. 1998;17(2):65–71.
19. Torgersen Z, Balters M. Perioperative nutrition. Surg
Clin North Am. 2015;95(2):255–67.
20. Wang ZG, Wang Q, Wang WJ, Qin HL. Randomized
clinical trial to compare the eects of preoperative
oral carbohydrate versus placebo on insulin resistance
after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010;97(3):317–27.
21. Awad S, Varadhan KK, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN.A metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials on preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in elective surgery.
Clin Nutr. 2013;32(1):34–44.
22. Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, Herbison GP, Soop M,
Nygren J. Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for
enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8):CD009161.
23. Han-Geurts IJ, Hop WC, Kok NF, Lim A, Brouwer KJ,
Jeekel J. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of
early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and
recovery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(5):555–61.
24. Dervenis C, Avgerinos C, Lytras D, Delis S.Benets and
limitations of enteral nutrition in the early postoperative period. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2003;387(11–12):
441–9.
25. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S.Early enteral
feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal

310
J. Bingener-Casey and R. M. Wilke
28
surgery: systematic review and meta- analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323(7316):773–6.
26. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral
nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later
commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):
CD004080.
27. Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H.Normal gastrointestinal
transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg.
2001;88(11):1498–500.
28. Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric
decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD004929.

311
Complications, Pitfalls and Prevention of Complications of Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair and Comparison to Open Repair
AsuriKrishna, VirinderKumarBansal, andMaheshC.Misra
29
29.1 Introduction – 312
29.2 Bowel Injury – 312
29.3 Infection – 314
29.3.1 Patient-Related Risk Factors – 315
29.3.2 Surgery-Related Risk Factors – 315
29.4 Mesh Infection – 316
29.5 Seroma – 319
29.5.1 Risk Factors – 320
29.6 Pain – 322
29.6.1 Pain andType ofFixation: Suture or Tacks – 322
29.7 Recurrence – 324
29.7.1 Risk Factors – 324
29.8 Miscellaneous Complications – 328
References – 329
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
R. Bittner et al. (eds.), Laparo-endoscopic Hernia Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55493-7_29
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
