Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_842_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Preface
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1: Clinical Anatomy of the Groin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
- •2.1.2 Contralateral Side
- •References
- •1.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1.1 General
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •Journals
- •Books
- •Miscellaneous
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Patient-Related Factors
- •6.3 Hernia-Related Factors
- •6.4 Surgeon-Related Factors
- •6.5 Anesthesia-Related Factors
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •6.9 Anesthesia-Related Factors
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 North American Trial
- •7.3 UK Trial
- •7.4 Long-Term Follow-Up
- •7.5 Summary
- •References
- •8: Perioperative Management of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •8.1.2 Dynamic Inguinal Ultrasound (DIUS)
- •Results
- •8.1.3 Treatment Plan
- •8.3.2 Perioperative Antibiotics
- •8.3.3 Thromboembolic Prophylaxis
- •Therapeutic Approach
- •Physical Activities
- •Heparin
- •Duration of VTE-Prophylaxis
- •8.3.8 Postoperative Pain Control
- •8.3.9 Discharge Management
- •8.4.1 Clinical Examination
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.1.2 Instruments
- •9.1.3 Operative Room Setup
- •Diagnostic Round View
- •9.2.4 Special Technical Remarks
- •Cord Lipoma
- •9.2.6 Comments
- •9.2.7 Peritoneal Closure
- •9.2.8 Port-Site Closure
- •References (in parentheses graduation of evidence)
- •10.1 Complications
- •10.1.3 Ad 3: Bowel Lesion
- •10.1.4 Ad 4. Urinary Bladder Injury
- •10.1.5 Ad 5. Hematoma/Seroma
- •10.1.7 Ad 7. Wound/Mesh Infection
- •10.1.8 Ad 8: Bowel Obstruction
- •10.1.10 Ad 10. Trocar Hernias
- •Case 1
- •Case 2
- •Case 3
- •Case 4
- •References
- •11.1 History
- •11.2 Standard Technique [10–13]
- •11.2.1 Patient Preparation
- •11.2.2 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •11.2.3 Thromboembolic Prophylaxis
- •11.2.4 Patient Positioning
- •11.2.5 Anesthesia
- •11.2.6 Team Positioning
- •11.2.7 Instruments
- •11.2.9 Dissection
- •11.2.10 Mesh Placement
- •11.3.1 Bilateral Inguinal Hernias
- •11.3.2 Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
- •11.3.3 Scrotal Hernias
- •11.3.4 Incarcerated Hernias
- •References
- •12: Technique Total Extraperitoneal Patch Plasty (TEP): Complications, Prevention, Education, and Preferences
- •12.1 Intraoperative Complications
- •12.1.3 Bleeding
- •12.1.7 Bladder Injury
- •12.1.8 Bowel Injury
- •12.1.10 Conversion
- •12.2 Postoperative Complications
- •12.2.1 Hematoma/Bleeding
- •12.2.2 Seroma
- •References
- •13: Comparison TAPP vs. TEP: Which Technique Is Better?
- •14.2.1 Preoperative Considerations
- •14.3.1 Post-op Care
- •13.3.2 Learning Curve
- •14: Complex Inguinal Hernias
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Inguinoscrotal Hernias
- •14.4.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 3
- •Level 5
- •14.6.1 Level 3
- •14.7.1 Level 3
- •14.7.2 Level 5
- •Level 5
- •14.8 Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Level II
- •Level IIC
- •14.9 Femoral Hernias
- •14.10 Obturator Hernia
- •14.11.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 4
- •Grade C
- •14.12.1 Evidence [3, 4]
- •Level 3
- •Grade D
- •14.13 Bilateral Hernia
- •14.13.1 Evidence [3]
- •References
- •15: Mesh Technology at Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •15.1 Biocompatibility
- •15.1.1 Synthetic Nonabsorbable
- •15.1.2 Synthetic Absorbable
- •15.1.3 Biological
- •15.2 Size
- •15.3 Slit: Yes or No?
- •15.4 Fixation (René H. Fortelny)
- •Recurrence
- •15.4.2 Glue Fixation
- •Permanent Versus Nonpermanent Fixation (Staple/Tack Versus Glue)
- •Recurrence
- •15.4.4 Self–Fixating Mesh
- •15.5 Summary
- •References
- •Biocompatibility
- •Fixation (Rene Fortelny)
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2.2 Postoperative Activity
- •16.3.2 Postoperative Activity
- •References
- •17: Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain (CPIP)
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.5 Diagnostics
- •17.14 Selective Neurectomy
- •17.15 Triple Neurectomy
- •17.18 Mesh Removal
- •17.19 Conclusion
- •References
- •18: Costs
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.6.4 Non-commercial Mesh
- •References
- •19: Sportsmen Hernia
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.3 How Is This Entity Diagnosed?
- •19.3.1 Physical Examination
- •19.3.2 Ultrasound
- •19.4 How Is This Entity Treated?
- •19.4.1 Conservative Treatment
- •19.4.2 Surgery
- •References
- •20.1.1 Introduction
- •Operative Time
- •Chronic Pain
- •Recurrences
- •20.1.4 Clinical Practice
- •References
- •21.2.1 Access Devices
- •21.2.2 Telescope
- •21.2.3 Instruments
- •21.3.1 Indications
- •21.3.2 Preoperative Preparation
- •21.4 Operation Theater Layout
- •21.5 Surgical Techniques
- •21.5.1 Reduced Port TEP
- •21.5.2 Reduced Port TAPP
- •References
- •22: Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall: What Is Important for Laparoscopic Surgery?
- •22.1.1 Introduction
- •22.1.2 The Body Wall
- •22.1.4 Topographic Situation
- •22.2 The Surgical View
- •22.2.1 Introduction
- •22.2.2 Abdominal Entry
- •22.2.3 Hernia Location
- •22.2.4 Fixation
- •22.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •Absolute Contraindications
- •Relative Contraindications
- •References
- •Indications for Laparoscopic Surgery: Limitations
- •24.1 Part I
- •24.2 Part II
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •References
- •26.1 Part I
- •References
- •27: Standard Technique Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral and Incisional Hernia
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.3 Pneumoperitoneum
- •27.6 Dissection Techniques
- •27.6.1 Adhesiolysis
- •27.7.1 Introduction
- •27.7.2 Problem
- •27.7.3 Method
- •27.7.4 Results
- •27.7.5 Discussion
- •27.7.6 Conclusion
- •27.8.1 Introduction
- •27.8.2 Indication
- •27.8.3 Technique
- •27.8.4 Discussion
- •27.8.5 Conclusion
- •27.9.1 Mesh Sizing
- •27.9.2 Mesh Manipulation
- •27.9.3 Mesh Fixation
- •References
- •28.1 Introduction
- •References
- •29: Complications, Pitfalls and Prevention of Complications of Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair and Comparison to Open Repair
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Bowel Injury
- •29.3 Infection
- •29.3.1 Patient-Related Risk Factors
- •29.3.2 Surgery-Related Risk Factors
- •29.4 Mesh Infection
- •29.5 Seroma
- •29.5.1 Risk Factors
- •29.6 Pain
- •29.7 Recurrence
- •29.7.1 Risk Factors
- •29.8 Miscellaneous Complications
- •References
- •30.2 Discussion
- •References
- •31.4 Parastomal Hernias
- •31.5 Obese Patients
- •References
- •Recurrence After Previous Open Repair
- •Recurrence After Previous Laparoscopic Repair
- •Giant Hernias: Loss of Domain
- •Parastomal Hernias
- •Obese Patients
- •References
- •33.1 Summary
- •References
- •34.1 Introduction
- •34.2 Operative Technique
- •34.3 Preliminary Results
- •34.4 Discussion
- •34.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •35.1 Introduction
- •35.2 Laparoscopic Technique
- •35.3 Evidence
- •35.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •References
- •37.4 Diagnostic Work-Up
- •37.6 Perioperative Management
- •References
- •38.2 Division of Short Gastric Vessels
- •38.4 Cruroplasty
- •38.5 Fundoplication
- •38.6 Mesh Augmentation
- •References
- •39.1 Suture Versus Mesh Repair
- •References
- •40.1.1 Introduction
- •40.1.2 Intraoperative Complications
- •40.1.6 Laparoscopic Approach
- •40.1.8 Postoperative Care
- •40.2.1 Comments
- •40.2.2 Comments
- •40.2.3 Comments
- •References
- •Praxis in Detail, “How I do It”, Daily Routine Tips and Tricks
- •Is What I am Doing Every Day Evidence Based?
- •41: Complex Hiatal Hernias
- •41.1 Upside-Down Stomach
- •41.1.2 Mesh Augmentation
- •Hiatal Surface Area (HSA)
- •Hiatus Reconstruction
- •Fundoplication
- •Follow-Up
- •41.1.4 Summary
- •41.2 Short Esophagus
- •41.2.1 Introduction
- •Types [38]
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •41.2.3 Treatment Options Include
- •Open
- •Laparoscopic
- •Intrathoracic Fundoplication
- •Esophagectomy
- •Collis Procedure
- •41.2.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Upside-Down Stomach
- •Short Esophagus
- •42.1 Recurrent Hiatus Hernia
- •42.1.1 Introduction
- •42.1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •42.1.3 Management
- •References
- •Recurrent Hiatus Hernia
- •Hiatal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients
- •References
- •44.1 Introduction
- •44.2 Indications
- •44.3 Preoperative Preparation
- •44.3.1 SILS Hiatal Hernia Repair
- •Operation Theater Layout
- •Instrumentation
- •Single Incision Multiple Fascial Puncture Method
- •Homemade Glove Port Method
- •Multichannel Port Method
- •44.5.1 Robotic Hiatus Hernia Repair
- •Operation Theater Layout
- •Instrumentation
- •44.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •45.1 Introduction
- •45.2 Training Center
- •45.2.1 Teaching Faculty
- •45.2.2 Interactive Classroom Teaching
- •45.2.4 Animal and Cadaveric Laboratory for Training
- •45.2.9 Learning Curve
- •45.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •46.1.2 Hemodynamic Changes
- •46.3 Anesthesia Practice
- •46.7 Summary
- •References
- •Index

Clinical Anatomy oftheGroin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
Median umbilical plica
7
1
Lateral umbilical plica
. Fig.1.1 Five peritoneal folds (plica)
Spina
Ileo - pubictract
. Fig.1.2 Recurrent hernia. Lateral plica is dicult to
identify (?)
Medial umbilical plica
Urinary bladder
?
the groin in a medial (space of Retzius) and a lateral (space of Bogros) compartment. Depending
on the patient’s body habitus and fat distribution,
the lateral ligament may not be readily visualized
laparoscopically (. Fig.1.2). However, the epigas-
tric vessels should always be preserved, and careful assessment of the anatomy prior to dissection
of the peritoneal ap is an essential operative step.
External palpation of the surface anatomy allows
for precise localization of the anterior superior
Fossa lateralis
. Fig.1.3 Three at fossae
Fossa medialis
Fossa vesicalis
iliac spine and pubic tubercle, thereby delineating
the ileo-pubic tract that divides the groin into an
upper and a most critical lower part (
. Fig.1.2).
e ileo-pubic tract which corresponds to the
inguinal ligament seen in open surgery is therefore one of the most important landmarks and
should always be identied. e inferior epigastric vessels are found approximately at the midpoint of the tract, and careful dissection in this
region will prevent injury.
In addition to the ve plicae, three at fos-
sae are recognizable on each side, corresponding
with possible hernia defects (. Fig.1.3). e lateral fossa, located in the triangle between the lateral umbilical ligament and the ileo-pubic tract,
corresponds to the location of the internal ring
from which a lateral (indirect) inguinal hernia
originates. e medial fossa is located between
the lateral and the medial umbilical ligament
and is inferiorly limited by the ileo-pubic tract
(
. Fig.1.4a). A direct hernia will be found in this
region passing through Hesselbach’s triangle.
e third fossa (vesicalis) is located medial to
the medial umbilical ligament and cranial to the
ileo- pubic tract, pubic bone, and urinary bladder. Rare defects in this point of weakness may
be the origin of a so-called supravesical hernia
(. Fig.1.4b, c). A fourth location where a hernia
may develop is within the region of the femoral
canal, the triangle below the ileo-pubic tract,
medial to the femoral vein and superior to the
pubic bone and Cooper’s ligament. A hernia
present in this region can be more easily diagnosed by laparoscopy (. Fig. 1.4d) compared
to the totally extraperitoneal technique or open
surgery.

8
R. Bittner et al.
1
a
c
b
d
. Fig.1.4 Hernia localizations. a Medial and lateral hernia. b Supravesical hernia. c Supravesical hernia, partially
reduced. d Femoral hernia
1.2 Anatomic Structures of
the Preperitoneal Space:
View After Creation of the
Peritoneal Flap inTAPP or
Total Extraperitoneal (TEP)
Dissection Plane
1.2.1 Transversalis Fascia
andPreperitoneal Space
Initial laparoscopic inguinal repairs utilized
intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) techniques
to cover inguinal hernia defects. is led to high
recurrence rates and complications because of the
inability to safely and securely xate the mesh in
this location rendering it “a boat in a rough sea.”
To address this limitation, mesh was placed within
the preperitoneal space in direct apposition to
the muscular, tendinous, and bony structures
of the posterior abdominal wall and pelvis. e
preperitoneal space lies between the peritoneum
internally and the transversalis fascia externally.
Within the preperitoneal space is a variable quantity of adipose tissue, loose areolar connective
tissue, and membranous tissue [12]. e transversalis fascia is perhaps the most important fascial
structure in the groin as it is involved in both the
development of a hernia as well as its treatment.

Clinical Anatomy oftheGroin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
Peritoneum
Internal
oblique m.
Transverse abd.m.
Epigastr.
vessels
9
1
External oblique
muscle
External oblique
aponeurosis
. Fig.1.5 a, b Schematic representation of the planes of the abdominal wall in the inguinal region (Modied
according Colborn and Skandalakis [15])
Cooper originally described the transversalis
fascia as a bilaminar structure with a strong anterior layer and a membranous deep layer [1] with
the epigastric vessels lying between. However,
the question whether the transversalis fascia is
bilaminar or whether the “deep/posterior lamina”
is simply a signicant regional condensation of
extraperitoneal connective tissue (“extraperitoneal fascia”) [13, 14] is still unresolved [15]. Both
structures appear strong and dicult to break
through especially in the young patient with an
indirect hernia. e deep membranous layer
(extraperitoneal fascia) divides the preperitoneal
space into a visceral and a parietal compartment.
Mirilas and Skandalakis [16] describe this membranous septum as creating a second internal ring
and separating the planes (. Fig.1.5a, b).
e parietal compartment contains the epigastric vessels and numerous small tributaries
and may be associated with troublesome bleeding
during dissection. e genitofemoral and lateral
femoral cutaneous nerves also travel within this
compartment, and over-dissection resulting in
“naked” nerves should be avoided to prevent perineural scarring and direct contact with mesh. e
visceral compartment is avascular and dissection
should proceed in this plane. Understanding this
anatomic distinction will greatly facilitate proper
dissection, ease of developing the correct preperi-
Fascia transversalis,
deep/post. layer
Fascia transversalis,
superficial/ant. layer
Iliac vessels
Pubic bone
toneal plane, and help to prevent vascular, nerve,
and mesh complications [17]. Despite numerous
cadaveric studies, the nature of the transversalis
fascia is still a source of controversy for surgeons
and anatomists [17, 18]. According to our clinical
experience with more than 16,000 laparoscopic
hernia repairs, two reasons may be responsible
for the continuing uncertainties: (1) ere is great
individual variability in its topographic occurrence and strength, and (2) whereas medial to the
epigastric vessels the bilaminar structure is recognizable in most patients (
its identication may be dicult. In some patients,
especially with obesity, adipose tissue and small
vessels may occupy the preperitoneal space making it dicult to clearly delineate the compartments medially. Lateral to the epigastric vessels,
the deep layer is less discrete and closely related
to the anterior lamina. In contrast to the medial
compartment, the dissection plane is immediately
in front of the deep lamina. erefore, because it is
easier to nd and separate the correct plane in this
region, it is recommended to start with the dissection of the groin at the lateral aspect at the level
of the anterior superior iliac spine (. Fig. 1.7a,
b
most of the preperitoneal dissection can be safely
and eciently performed by bluntly sweeping
away the peritoneum and fatty tissue from the
. Fig.1.6a, b), medially,
). Aer making a generous peritoneal incision,
Urin.
bladder
Rectus
muscle

10
R. Bittner et al.
1
a
. Fig.1.6 a Supercial and deep layer of transversalis fascia medially. b Supercial layer of transversalis fascia after
breaking through the deep layer
a
b
b
. Fig.1.7 a Deep layer of the transversalis fascia. b Access to the visceral laterally compartment from lateral-caudal.
The deep layer of the transversalis fascia is protected
abdominal wall covered by the transversalis fas-
cia. However, when crossing the epigastric ves-
sels in order to dissect the medial compartment,
it is necessary to break through the deep layer to
approach the rectus muscle and the symphysis.
Medially, both laminae of the transversalis
fascia insert inferiorly on the ligament of Cooper.
Laterally, its course is less clear. Around the internal inguinal ring, the deep bers may envelop the
cord structures and contribute at least partially
to the spermatic sheath as extensively described
by Stoppa [19]. e morphology of the spermatic
sheath is triangular with an anterior apex at the
deep aspect of the inner inguinal orice and a
posterior medial base. e vas deferens makes
up its medial border while the spermatic vessels delineate the lateral border. e base of the
sheath disappears beneath the retracted peritoneal sac when parietalization is performed [19].
Additionally, the spermatic sheath covers the
external iliac vessels which reside just deep to the
triangle. Although the origin of this sheath is not
clearly dened – prolongation of the urogenital
fascia as Stoppa [19] suggested or a continuation
of the deep layer of the transversalis fascia– for the
surgeon it is of essential importance to recognize
this sheath and not to violate it when dissecting
the pelvic oor, except at the level of the internal

Clinical Anatomy oftheGroin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
11
1
a
. Fig.1.8 a Transition of the deep layer of the transversalis fascia into the spermatic sheath (Stoppa). b The spermatic
sheath is wrapping the cord structures
b
Stretching the deep layer
. Fig.1.9 The spermatic sheath is cut anteriorly to
parietalize the hernia/peritoneal sac
inguinal ring anteriorly (. Fig. 1.8a, b). With an
indirect hernia, the sheath is opened at the ring to
identify and reduce the hernia sac as well as when
parietalizing the cord structures (. Fig.1.9).
According to Stoppa et al. [19], the sheath
(deep layer of the transversalis fascia) joins the
lateral wall of the iliac fossa and may be a part of
the iliac fascia which covers the inguinal nerves.
. Fig.1.10 The deep layer (extraperitoneal fascia)
continues laterally into the iliac fascia which protects the
nerve lying behind
In summary, the spermatic sheath (deep layer of
the transversalis fascia) should be preserved during separation from the hernia/peritoneal sac
(parietalization) because it protects the external
iliac vessels and the nerves that are lying beneath
. Fig. 1.10). e surgeon must preserve this
(
important fascial layer for two reasons: (1) to
avoid an injury to the vessels or the nerves during
dissection and (2) to avoid direct contact between
the nerves and mesh which may produce pain in
the later postoperative period due to perineural
scarring. For the same reason, implantation of a
slitted mesh cannot be recommended as the integ-

12
R. Bittner et al.
rity of the fascia will be destroyed and the nerves,
1
spermatic vessels, and vas are all placed at risk.
as lymph nodes. is tissue must be respected and
not removed when dissecting the groin. e same
consideration applies to the iliac vessels which are
protected by the spermatic sheath. e iliac artery,
1.2.2 Preperitoneal Space
andtheVessels
located at the bottom of the pelvis and in the middle of the preperitoneal space, may be identied by
following the epigastrics downward toward their
e location and the course of the vessels remain
fairly constant with a few common variations, and
identication is typically straightforward. e
inferior epigastric vessels are perhaps the most
important landmark in the myopectineal orice
and are easily recognized even in obese patients
(see above). It is important to recognize that in
case a large hernia sac or a lipoma is present, the
vessels may be dislocated medially (. Fig.1.11a, b).
e epigastric vessels divide the myopectineal orice into a medial and a lateral compartment. e
proper dissection plane should be just in front
of these vessels (from the posterior laparoscopic
approach). When performing a TEP repair, creation of the preperitoneal space relies on this same
dissection plane. With a dissecting balloon, the
epigastric vessels should be above the plane of dissection before ination and preserved against the
abdominal muscles. With camera and manual dissection of this space, the areolar plane posterior to
the epigastric vessels is developed separating the
epigastric vessels from the peritoneum. e epigastric vessels originate from the external iliac vessels and may be surrounded by fatty tissue as well
origin (. Fig. 1.12a, b). e iliac vessels may be
accompanied by fatty tissue and lymph nodes and
over-dissection may lead to bleeding, potential
nerve injury, or lymphatic leakage. Preservation of
the spermatic sheath will avoid these issues. e
iliac vein is located posterior and slightly medial to
the artery. It may be visualized during dissection
of the groove in the triangle between the lower
branch of the pubic bone, the iliac vessels, and the
wall of the urinary bladder (. Fig.1.13).
Dissection of this region should be performed
with special caution looking for the presence of
a corona mortis, a vascular connection between
the epigastric and obturator vessels. is variant, found in 20–30% of patients, is important
because intraoperative bleeding from disruption
can be dicult to control due to the dual vascular supply from the obturator and iliac vessels
(corona mortis, . Fig.1.14). In case of bleeding
from the corona mortis, control must be achieved
from both sources of inow. In this region, there
may be several variants of anastomosing vascular
branches between the pubic artery/vein and the
epigastric and obturator vessels. ese small vas-
a
. Fig.1.11 a The epigastric vessels just after reduction of the peritoneum with the deep layer of transversalis fascia.
bEpigastric vessels dislocated medially by a large lipoma
b

Clinical Anatomy oftheGroin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
13
1
a
. Fig.1.12 a Pelvic oor after complete dissection. A. iliaca is visible directly in the middle. b A. iliaca dislocated laterally
Iliac vein
Pubic bone
b
. Fig.1.13 Dissection of the “groove,” exposing the
obturator nerve and the iliac vein
cular tributaries may form a network investing
the pubic bone, Cooper’s ligament, and the direct
and femoral spaces (. Fig.1.15). From our clinical experience, these vessels and the underlying
pubic bone are covered by a very thin membrane
(deep layer of the transversalis fascia) which
should not be disrupted.
e correct plane of dissection will preserve this
membranous layer, and blunt dissection may be
used to push away the urinary bladder developing
the retropubic space for mesh placement. In special
cases, e.g., recurrence aer previous preperitoneal
mesh repair, it may be necessary to continue the dissection downward to the urogenital space toward
the origin of the remnant umbilical artery from
the internal iliac artery (
. Fig. 1.16a, b). e vas
. Fig.1.14 Corona mortis
traverses directly over the artery (
. Fig.1.16a), and
care should be taken when dissecting this region.
e surgeon should be aware that the umbilical
artery may be patent and, in the case of injury,
bleeding may be profuse and dicult to control.
e testicular vessels are easily identiable but
can be most clearly dened at their caudal aspect
between the external iliac vessels and the psoas
muscle and course from caudal-lateral to cranialmedial. ere are no signicant vascular structures
lateral to the testicular vessels. e testicular vessels
meet the vas deferens at the apex of the triangle
immediately at the entrance to internal ring. e
vas deferens travels downward crossing the iliac
vessels medially, following the “preperitoneal loop”
(deep layer of the transversalis fascia [20]), but then

14
R. Bittner et al.
changes its direction like a knee and dives down to
1
the urogenital space to join the prostate gland. In
order to complete the parietalization, it is important
to cut this “preperitoneal loop” (. Fig.1.17)
interest in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and
this neuroanatomy should be well understood by
all surgeons. Anatomically, the n. hypogastricus
and the n. ilioinguinalis are not involved in the
dissection and repair planes utilized by laparo-
scopic hernia repair. ese nerves have typically
1.2.3 Preperitoneal Space and
Topographic Anatomy of
theNerves
exited the retroperitoneum and entered into the
anterior abdominal wall and inguinal canal lateral
and superior to the anterior superior iliac spine.
However, as a rule to the lumbar plexus neuro-
e anatomy of the nerves located in the groin
is extensively described by Rossner [5], Seid and
Amos [6], Annibali et al. [7, 8], Rosenberger
etal. [9], Loeweneck et al. [10], and recently by
Reinpold et al. [11]. In total, six nerves are of
anatomy, there is tremendous anatomic variability
especially progressing distally along the branches
away from the spinal origin. In about 32% of
cases, the course of the ilioinguinal nerve may be
within the operating eld and may be at risk dur-
. Fig.1.15 Network of pubic veins, protected by the
deep layer of the transversalis fascia
a
. Fig.1.16 a Remnant A. umbilicalis in situ, coming out of the internal iliac artery. b A. umbilicalis in cadaveric dissection
. Fig.1.17 The vas is riding on the preperitoneal loop
which must be cut for complete parietalization [20]
b

Clinical Anatomy oftheGroin: Posterior Laparoscopic Approach
15
1
ing the placement of staples in the neighborhood
of the anterior superior iliac spine (Rosenberger).
e femoral nerve, which arises from the dorsal branches of the ventral rami of the second,
third, and fourth lumbar nerves, is located just
lateral to the iliac vessels and lateral and beneath
the testicular vessels. is is usually well protected
by the psoas tendon, surrounding fatty and lymphatic tissue, and spermatic sheath or iliac fascia.
erefore, injury to this nerve is extremely rare
during laparoscopic hernia repair. According to
Loeweneck, damage of this nerve was seen in only
1.2% of all nerve injuries reported. Reported injury
to the obturator nerve is rare and anecdotal as it
shares the same origin as the femoral nerve and is
well hidden deep in the triangle between the pubic
bone and the iliac vessels (. Fig.1.13) behind the
vessels. e more common nerve injuries seen
with laparoscopic inguinal repairs are lesions of
the genitofemoral nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (. Fig.1.18). However, in total in large
series, the frequency of damage to these nerves is
not higher than 0.3% [21, 22]. Nevertheless, each
of these complications should be taken seriously,
as it can have disastrous consequences for the
patient. Intractable pain may arise when nerves
are injured, clipped, tacked, or scarred to mesh.
erefore, precise knowledge of the topography of
these nerves is essential to perform a high quality
repair with optimal patient outcomes. While the
course of the obturator and femoral motor nerves
is largely predictable and constant, the course of
the sensory nerves (genitofemoral and lateral
femoral cutaneous) demonstrates great variability.
Most at risk during laparoscopic hernia repair
are the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (58.2% of all
nerve lesions) and the femoral branch of the genitofemoral nerve (31.2% of all nerve lesions). Injury
to the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve
comprises 4.7% of all published nerve lesions. e
lateral femoral cutaneous nerve arises from the dorsal divisions of the second and third lumbar nerves.
It emerges from the lateral border of the mid-psoas
muscle and crosses the iliacus muscle obliquely
traveling toward the anterior superior iliac spine. It
then passes under the inguinal ligament, through
the lacuna musculorum and then over the sartorius
muscle into the thigh, where it divides into an anterior and a posterior branch. e anterior branch
becomes supercial about 10cm below the inguinal
ligament and divides into branches which are distributed to the skin of the anterior and lateral parts
of the thigh reaching as far as the knee.
e posterior branch supplies the skin from
the level of the greater trochanter to the middle of
the thigh. Intraoperatively, the surgeon should be
aware that the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve will
typically cross the middle of the operating eld,
but the majority (57%) demonstrates variability
from the normal course. Single (44%), double
(23%), or multiple nerve trunks may be identied
. Fig.1.19). e point of exit where the nerve pen-
(
etrates the abdominal wall is typically lateral to the
. Fig.1.18 Triangle of pain. The nerves are protected
by the deep layer of transversalis fascia
. Fig.1.19 Two branches of the cutaneous lateral
femoral nerve

16
R. Bittner et al.
1
a
Psoas
muscle
c
b
d
Psoas
muscle
. Fig.1.20 a Only one branch of the genitofemoral
nerve is visible. b Four branches of the genitofemoral
nerve are visible protected by the deep layer of transver-
eld 2–4cm medial to the anterior superior iliac
spine at the level of the ileo-pubic tract. However,
this exit point also demonstrates signicant variability and may be found up to 6cm medially (only
3cm lateral to the inner inguinal ring) and in 7%
of the cases may even exit lateral and cranial to the
anterior superior iliac spine [9]. e genitofemoral
nerve arises from the upper L1–2 segments of the
lumbar plexus. It passes downward and emerges
from the anterior surface of the psoas major muscle. e nerve continues on the surface of the psoas
muscle progressing caudally toward the inguinal
salis fascia. c Three branches of the genitofemoral nerve
are visible. Laterally the n. cut. fem. lat. is visible (arrow).
dThree branches of the genitofemoral nerve are visible
canal and divides into two branches, the genital
branch and the femoral branch (. Fig.1.18).
In men, the genital branch continues down
and supplies the scrotal skin. In women it accompanies the round ligament and supplies the mons
pubis and the labia majora. Wide variation in the
course of this nerve are seen. In contrast to classically described anatomy, the genital branch runs
through the inguinal canal in only 14% of cases.
In 44% of cases, it consists of two to ve branches
. Fig. 1.20a–d); in 49% of the cases, the nerve
(
perforates the abdominal wall 1–3cm lateral to
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
