Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_841_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •The Basics
- •1: Introduction
- •Reference
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.7 Discussion
- •References
- •3.2 Legal Framework
- •3.6 Enlightenment
- •3.7 Documentation
- •3.8 Conclusion
- •3.1 Introduction
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •5: Introduction
- •5.1.1 Approach
- •Reference
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2.3 Crural Repair
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2.1 Access
- •7.2.2 Dissection
- •7.2.4 Fundoplication
- •Paraesophageal Hernia/Upside-Down Stomach
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Preparation
- •8.3 Operative Technique
- •8.5 Hiatoplasty
- •8.6 Fundoplication
- •8.7 Summary
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Preoperative Workup
- •9.3 Preparation
- •9.4 Surgical Technique
- •9.4.1 Reduction of Hernia Sac
- •9.4.2 Mediastinal Dissection
- •9.4.3 Crural Closure
- •9.5.1 Short Esophagus
- •9.5.3 Bleeding
- •9.5.4 Visceral Injury
- •References
- •10.1 Background
- •10.2 Evaluation
- •10.3 Procedure
- •10.4 Post-op Regimen
- •10.5 Complications
- •10.6 Follow-Up
- •11.1.1 Preoperative Workup
- •11.1.2 Operating Room Setup
- •11.1.3 Operative Technique
- •11.1.4 Fundoplication Construction
- •11.2.1 Abnormal Vascular Anatomy
- •11.2.2 Adipose Tissue
- •11.2.3 Adhesions
- •11.2.4 “Small Gastric” Fundus
- •11.2.5 Intrathoracic Stomach
- •11.3 Personal Experiences
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Technique
- •12.2.2 S-Nissen Fundoplication
- •12.2.3 S-Gastric Resection
- •12.2.4 S-Gastric Ulcer Repair
- •12.3 Discussion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Preoperative Assessment
- •13.3 Operative Technique
- •13.4 Special/Unusual Situations
- •13.5 Postoperative Course
- •References
- •Individual Surgery for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •14: Introduction
- •14.3 Distal Gastrectomy
- •14.5 Multivisceral Resection
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.4 Postoperative Problems
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Prognostic Factors
- •16.3 Preoperative Considerations
- •16.3.1 Presentation
- •16.3.4 Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •16.4 Surgical Technique
- •16.4.2 Laparoscopic Approach
- •Patient Selection
- •Preparation
- •Technique
- •16.4.3 Open Approach
- •Patient Selection
- •Preparation
- •Technique
- •16.5 Intraoperative Complications
- •16.5.1 Pneumothorax
- •16.6.2 Reoperative Gastric Surgery
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •Individual Surgery for Gastric Cancer
- •17: Introduction
- •17.1 Approach
- •18.2 Remnant Gastrectomy
- •18.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.1.2 Therapeutic Strategies
- •19.1.3 Extent of Resection
- •19.2 Preparation
- •19.3 Surgical Technique
- •19.3.3 Subtotal Gastric Resection
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.3 Operative Technique
- •20.3.1 Resection
- •20.3.2 Reconstruction
- •20.3.4 Subtotal Distal Gastrectomy
- •Literature
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.3 Subtotal Gastrectomy
- •References
- •Individual Surgery for Benign Gallbladder and Bile Ducts Diseases
- •22: Introduction
- •22.1 Patients with Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis
- •22.2 Patients with Acute Cholecystitis
- •23.5 Abnormal Anatomy
- •23.6 Variants
- •23.6.3 Accessory Bile Ducts (II-III)
- •23.7 Pathological Anatomy
- •23.7.2 Mirizzi Syndrome (III-IV)
- •23.8 Extrahepatic Bile Duct Injuries
- •23.9 Common Bile Duct Stones
- •Reference
- •24.2.1 Introduction
- •24.2.2 Surgical Technique
- •24.2.3 Indications
- •24.2.4 Results
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.3 Laparoscopic Technique
- •25.3.1 Positioning
- •25.3.2 Trocar Placement
- •25.3.6 Right Hemicolectomy
- •25.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.3 Duodenal Fistula
- •26.4 Sigmoid and Rectal Fistulae
- •26.5 Stricturing Disease
- •26.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •27.1 Crohn’s Disease
- •27.1.4 Abdominal Fistulae
- •Ulcerative Colitis
- •Anal Canal-Sustaining Colectomy
- •The Pouch Design
- •Pouch Redo Surgery
- •27.3 Conclusions
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •Individual Surgery for Right Hemicolectomy
- •28: Introduction
- •28.1.1 Approach
- •28.1.2 Exploration
- •28.1.3 Right Colon Mobilisation
- •28.1.4 Transection of Vessels
- •28.2.1 Trocar Placement
- •28.2.2 Transection of Vessels
- •28.2.3 Right Colon Mobilisation
- •28.2.5 Removing of Specimen
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Operating Room
- •29.3 Surgical Technique
- •29.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •30.1 Introduction
- •30.2 Preparation
- •30.3 Technique
- •30.4 Intraoperative Complications
- •30.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •31.1 Introduction
- •31.2 Preparation
- •31.3 Surgical Technique
- •References
- •32.1 Introduction
- •32.2 Patient Preparation
- •32.3 Operation Technique
- •32.4 Reconstruction Phase
- •Individual Surgery for Left Hemicolectomy
- •33: Introduction
- •34.1 Introduction
- •34.2 Preparation
- •34.3 Surgical Technique
- •34.4 Postoperative Management
- •34.5.1 Splenic Injury
- •34.5.2 Ureteral Injury
- •Other Colon Tumors
- •PeritoneaI Carcinomatosis
- •Liver Metastases
- •Liver Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension
- •References
- •35.1 Introduction
- •35.2.1 Concept
- •35.2.5 Anastomosis
- •35.3.1 Concept
- •35.3.2 Set-Up
- •35.3.6 Anastomosis
- •36.1 Preparation
- •36.2 Operation Technique
- •Individual Surgery for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
- •Reference
- •38.2 Tactics of the Operation
- •38.3 Loop Ileostomy
- •38.4 Hartmann’s Procedure
- •38.6 Loop Ileostomy
- •38.7 Hartmann’s Procedure
- •38.9 Open Loop Ileostomy
- •38.10 Open Hartmann’s Procedure
- •Individual Surgery for Rectal Cancer
- •39: Introduction
- •39.1.1 Approach
- •Step 5: Rectal Transection
- •Step 6: Anastomosis
- •39.3 Rectum Extirpation
- •40.1 Introduction
- •40.2 Preparations
- •40.3 Surgical Technique
- •42.1 Introduction
- •42.1.2 Insertion of the Trocars
- •42.2 Operation Technique
- •42.2.2 Protective Ileostomy
- •42.3 Discussion and Conclusion
- •42.4.1 Situation
- •42.4.2 Solution of the Problem
- •42.4.3 Analysis
- •42.4.4 Conclusion
- •43.1 Introduction
- •43.2 Surgical Technique
- •43.2.2 Anterior Rectal Resection
- •43.2.3 Low Anterior Resection
- •44.2 The Surgery
- •44.2.1 High Anterior Resection (HAR)
- •44.2.2 Low Anterior Resection (LAR)
- •44.3 Locally Advanced Tumours
- •44.4 When to Convert
- •44.5 Tips
- •44.5.1 Patient Positioning
- •44.5.2 Port Placement
- •44.5.4 Technical Tips
- •44.5.5 The Adipose Patient
- •44.6 Quality Control
- •44.7 Pitfalls
- •44.7.2 Small Bowel Injury
- •44.7.3 Injury to the Ureter
- •44.7.4 Nerve Injury
- •44.7.5 Colon/Rectum Injury
- •44.7.6 Injury to the Vagina
- •Reference
- •Further Reading
- •45.1 Introduction
- •45.3 Preparation
- •45.3.1 Procedure, Abdominal Part
- •45.3.2 Procedure, Perineal Part
- •References
- •46.1 Introduction
- •46.3 Initial Workup
- •46.4 Patient Preparation
- •46.5 Patient Positioning
- •46.6 Equipment
- •46.7 Operative Technique
- •46.7.1 Port Placement
- •46.7.2 Colonic Mobilisation
- •Exposure
- •Isolation and Ligation of the Vascular Pedicle
- •Medial to Lateral Mobilisation and Ligation and Division of the Inferior Mesenteric Vein
- •Lateral Mobilisation
- •Mobilisation of the Left-Sided Transverse Colon
- •Step 1: Posterior Dissection
- •Step 2: Right Lateral Dissection
- •Step 3: Anterior Dissection (Exposure)
- •Step 4: Left Lateral Dissection
- •Step 5a: Anterior Dissection in Male
- •Step 5b: Anterior Dissection in Female
- •Step 6: Right and Left Posterolateral Dissection, Exposure of Erigent Pillars
- •Step 7: Completion of Dissection
- •Step 8: Rectal Washout
- •Step 9: Stapler Division
- •46.7.4 Extraction of Specimen
- •46.7.5 Anastomosis
- •46.7.6 Loop Ileostomy
- •46.8 Postoperative Care
- •46.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •47.1 Introduction
- •47.2.1 Preoperative Evaluation
- •47.2.2 Preoperative Radiotherapy
- •47.2.3 Preparation
- •47.2.5 Surgical Procedure
- •First Stage: Abdominal Phase
- •Second Stage
- •47.4.1 Bleeding
- •Further Reading
- •References
- •50: Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation during Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) from Werner Kneist
- •50.1 Introduction
- •50.2 Preoperative Aspects
- •50.2.1 Medical History
- •50.2.2 Clinical Examination
- •50.2.3 Imaging Diagnostics
- •50.3 Surgery Technique
- •Pelvic Neuroanatomy
- •Inferior Mesenteric Plexus
- •Hypogastric Nerves and Superior Hypogastric Plexus
- •Inferior Hypogastric Plexus, Pelvic Splanchnic Nerves
- •Nn. Rectales Inferiores
- •50.5 Postoperative Aspects
- •50.6 Case Examples
- •References
- •Individual Surgery for Rectal Prolapse
- •51: Introduction
- •52.1 Introduction
- •52.2 The Concept of NOTES
- •52.3 Patient Preparation
- •52.4 Operative Technique
- •53.1 Introduction
- •53.2 Technique
- •53.2.1 Patient Selection
- •53.2.2 Preparation
- •53.2.3 Operative Technique
- •53.2.4 Postoperative Care
- •References
- •54.1 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
- •Ideal Case
- •Not Quite Ideal Cases
- •Problematic Cases
- •Very Problematic Case
- •54.2 STARR
- •Ideal Cases
- •Not Quite Ideal Cases
- •Problematic Cases
- •Very Problematic Cases
- •Technique by Two Staplers
- •Very Problematic Case
- •Technique by Contour Transtar
- •54.4 SIR Procedure
- •54.5 POPS Technique
- •54.5.1 Very Problematic Case
- •Index

226
K.-H. Vestweber
27
21. Mathis KL, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Ama RR, Wol B,
Pemberton JH. Outcome in patients with ulcerative
colitis undergoing partial of complete reconstructive
surgery for failing pouch-ileal anastomosis. Ann Surg.
2009;249:409.
22. Gorfine SR, Harris MT, Bub DS, Bauer JJ. Restorative
proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis complicating
by colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;
47:1377–85.
Further Reading
1. Mikulicz J. Zur operativen Behandlung des stenosierenden Magengeschwürs. Langenbecks Arch Chir.
1887;XXXVII:1.

227
Individual Surgery for Right Hemicolectomy
Contents
Chapter 28 Introduction – 229
MichaelKorenkov, Christoph-omasGermer,
andHaukeLang
Chapter 29 Surgical Technique and Dicult
Situations from Roberto Bergamaschi
(Laparoscopic) – 235
SethA.Stein andRobertoC.M.Bergamaschi
VII
Chapter 30 Surgical Technique and Dicult
Situations from Alain Gainant
(Conventional) – 243
AlainGainant
Chapter 31 Surgical Technique and Dicult
Situations from Werner Hohenberger
(Conventional) – 249
WernerHohenberger
Chapter 32 Surgical Technique and Dicult
Situations from Stefano Saad
(Laparoscopic) – 255
StefanoSaad

229
Introduction
MichaelKorenkov, Christoph-omasGermer, andHaukeLang
28.1 Open Right Hemicolectomy for Colon
Cancer – 230
28.1.1 Approach – 230
28.1.2 Exploration – 230
28.1.3 Right Colon Mobilisation – 230
28.1.4 Transection of Vessels – 231
28.1.5 Creation of Ileotransverse Anastomosis – 231
28.2 Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy
for Colon Cancer – 232
28.2.1 Trocar Placement – 232
28.2.2 Transection of Vessels – 232
28.2.3 Right Colon Mobilisation – 232
28.2.4 Creation of Ileotransverse Anastomosis – 233
28.2.5 Removing of Specimen – 233
28.2.6 Classification of Intraoperative Difficulties – 233
28
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017
M. Korenkov et al. (eds.), Gastrointestinal Operations and Technical Variations,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49878-1_28

M. Korenkov et al.230
28
e surgical treatment for right colon cancer consists from an ablative and reconstructive phase.
e ablative phase is subdivided into following
steps:
1. Approach
2. Exploration
3. Mobilisation of the right colon in CME technique (complete mesocolic excision)
4. Transection of vessels
5. Transection of the terminal ileum and transverse colon
In reconstructive phase, an ileotransverse anastomosis will be performed.
Currently both open and laparoscopic right
hemicolectomy are established.
28.1 Open Right Hemicolectomy
for Colon Cancer
28.1.1 Approach
Midline laparotomy, paramedian laparotomy and
middle abdomen transverse laparotomy are most
common approaches. All these incisions permit
an adequate exploration. We believe that vertical
incisions are more advantageous for patients with
narrow inferior thoracic aperture. Contrary we
prefer transverse laparotomy for obese patients
with a broad distance between the right and le
anterior axillary lines.
28.1.2 Exploration
For an adequate exploration, dierent wound
retractor systems (Omni-Tract, Bookwalter,
Rochard, Mercedes, etc.) will be used. In the
abdominal exploration, a local tumour extent
and availability of distant metastasis or peritoneal
carcinomatosis will be evaluated. In dependence
on the intraoperative ndings, the perioperative
dened strategy will be upgraded. Technical difculties by this step can occur in patients with
previous abdominal surgery and depend on the
extent of abdominal adhesions. Accordingly a sufcient adhesiolysis is necessary for the adequate
exploration. Strategical diculties related to the
extent of resection can occur in patients with
locally advanced tumours (see below).
28.1.3 Right Colon Mobilisation
This step consists from mobilisation of the terminal ileum, caecum, ascending colon and the
right part of transverse colon. The technical
and tactical problems can occur for the most
part in patients with locally advanced tumours
with infiltration of neighbouring organs especially the superior mesenteric vessels, duodenum and pancreatic head. In this regard, the
preoperative performance of abdominal CT
scan is obligated. With the planning of operation, the following questions should be discussed already preoperatively:
1. How extent should be applied en bloc resection (wedge resection or complete resection of
involved neighbouring organs or structures)?
In case of the correlation between an intraoperative nding and preoperative CT scan, the
operation will be performed as planned. In
case of deviation between CT scan results and
intraoperative nding (intraoperative tumour
adhesions or inltration is more extent than
expected), en bloc resection should be aimed
independent from inammatory or malignant
type of inltration.
2. What kind of mobilisation (from lateral to
medial or opposite) should be favoured for the
locally advanced tumours? In such cases, we
recommend using of “classic” mobilisation
from lateral to medial.
3. When is a patient locally inoperable? From our
point of view, an expanded tumour inltration
of mesenteric vessels is a limited factor for R0
resection. Also a widespread tumour inltration of pancreatic lower edge is a risk factor for
intraoperative tumour cell dissemination.
For the local, not advanced, tumour without serosal inltration, the most dicult situations can
occur during the mobilisation of the right part of
the transverse colon. Not gentle tractions can lead
to tear of gastrocolic trunk of Henle with severe
bleeding. For the better control of this complication, we recommend to perform a mobilisation of
the right part of the transverse colon from medial
to lateral. An opening of the bursa omentalis in
the middle of the transverse colon allows a good
exploration and dissection from all vascular gastrocolic structures from the middle of the transverse colon to the right colon exure.

Introduction
28.1.4 Transection of Vessels
e transection of vessels (ileocolic vessels, right
colic vessels as well as colica media vessels in case
of extended right hemicolectomy) is technically
the most unproblematic; dicult decision situations are not common. Because of oncological
requested high arterial ligation increases a risk of
accidental injury of the superior mesenteric vessels. In order to avoid this complication, arterial
and vein mesenteric superior should be identied
for the transection.
28.1.5 Creation of Ileotransverse
Anastomosis
231
28
An ileotransverse anastomosis can be created
using suture sewn by the hand or stapled end-toend, end-to-side and side-to-side anastomosis.
is part of the operation is usually not connected
with technical or strategical diculties.
Handsewn anastomosis will be created using
one or two rows of sutures. Depending on the surgeon preference, dierential suture materials
(resorbable, non-resorbable, mono- or multilament) will be used.
Stapled anastomosis will be created with a linear or circular stapler side to side or end to side.
For the enterotomy closure, also a stapler but not
a handsewn is recommended. With the creation
of circular-stapled anastomosis, an anvil of circular stapler (25mm mostly) will be introduced in a
terminal ileum. A stapler stab will be introduced
in the transverse colon whereon a stapler pin will
be broken through a tenia libera and end-to-side
anastomosis will be created (. Fig. 28.1).
By using linear stapler, an ileotransverse anastomosis will be side to side with antiperistaltic position
of the ileum created (. Fig. 28.2). An enterotomy
will be also closured with linear stapler (. Fig. 28.3).
Dicult situations occur mostly in patients
with a chronic small bowel ileus due to stenotic
tumours. In such situation, it is sometimes problematic to create a safe anastomosis with severe
dilatated terminal ileum with an oedematous and
fragile wall. e question on “stapled anastomosis
completely” or “handsewn anastomosis completely” or “mixed handsewn/stapled anastomosis”
depends on intraoperative situation and surgeon
preference and will be solved individually.
. Fig. 28.1 Creation of ileotransverse end-to-side
anastomosis with circular stapler
. Fig. 28.2 Creation of antiperistaltic ileotransverse
side-to-side anastomosis with linear stapler
. Fig. 28.3 Enterotomy closure

M. Korenkov et al.232
28
28.2 Laparoscopic Right
Hemicolectomy for Colon
Cancer
Intraoperative steps are similar to the open
approach procedure; however, their order can con-
siderably deviate. Locally advanced tumours are a
contraindication for laparoscopic approach for
many surgeons. e technical performance of lap-
aroscopic right hemicolectomy is much more dif-
cult compared to an open approach. Accordingly,
this operation is related to more intraoperative
problems and dicult decision situations
28.2.1 Trocar Placement
e optic trocar will be placed most commonly
infra- or supraumbilical. Two working trocars will
be placed le from the midline. Number position
and size of trocars are very variable and depend
on the anatomical particularities and personal
surgeon preferences.
28.2.2 Transection of Vessels
A lot of surgeons started the right hemicolectomy
with transection of ileocolic vessels. It is almost
always possible to identify an ileocolic pedicle if a
patient will be placed in Trendelenburg position and
turned on the le. ereby the caecum should be
pulled in ventrolateral direction. Transection of ves-
sels can be performed between the clips, with energy
devices or with vascular stapler. e preparation of
ileocolic vessels can be performed as follows:
kPreparation Along the Ileocolic Pedicle from
Peripheral to Central
will be cut on both sides from the middle of the
vascular pedicle. Further preparation should be
performed in central direction to mesenteric
vessels. Aer the identication of it, the central
transection of ileocolic vessels should be performed.
is step is especially useful in patients with a fatty
mesocolon because it is easier to nd an ileocolic
pedicle than mesenteric vessels.
kPreparation Along the Mesenteric Vessels
ereby the mesenteric and colica media pedicles
will be identied at rst. en the peritoneum will
be cut along the mesenteric pedicle and the lateral
ereby the peritoneum
side of them will be prepared. Aer that, the
ileocolic and right colic (if available) vessels will
be centrally transected.
Technical problems and dicult situation can
occur because of bleeding due to vessel injury.
Venous vessels can be injured frequently due to a
blind preparation, not gentle traction or thermic
damage. Particular dicult intraoperative situation can take place during the injury of mesenteric vessels. Predisposing factors for these
complications are very fatty meso and a bad exposition of a preparation plain.
28.2.3 Right Colon Mobilisation
is step has a lot of technical varieties as follows:
1. From medial to lateral
2. From lateral to medial
3. From bottom to top
4. From top to bottom
5. Combination from one to four
e most common combinations are from medial
to lateral and from bottom to top. e best conditions for such preparation are a good exploration of
ileocolic, mesenteric and colica media pedicles as
well as the lower part of the duodenum. Aer transection of the ileocolic vessels, the preparation
along a mesenteric pedicle has been carried out
between the meso of the right colon and parietal
sheet of the retroperitoneum in the direction of
colica media pedicle. Depends on volumes of
resection (standard or extended right hemicolectomy) the mobilisation of the transverse mesocolon will be performed oral- or aboral sides from the
colica media pedicle. Aer division of peritoneal
sheet, a mesocolon “window” will be created near
the bowel wall and bursa omentalis will be opened.
e greater omentum will be divided at the resection level. A farther mobilisation takes place either
from top to bottom (right transverse colon → right
colic exure → ascending colon → caecum → ileo-
cecal area) or from bottom to top.
Technical problems and dicult decision situation can occur in the following cases:
1. Duodenal injury
2. Pancreatic injury
3. Vessel injury in the right part of the gastro-
colic ligament
4. Opening of the posterior peritoneal sheet and
retroperitoneal preparation

Introduction
233
28
28.2.4 Creation of Ileotransverse
Anastomosis
An ileotransverse anastomosis can be created either
intra- or extracorporeal. For an extracorporeal
anastomosis, a minilaparotomy (median supraumbilical or transverse in upper right abdomen) will be
performed. is technique does not dier from the
above described open technique. In obese patient, it
is sometimes necessary to prolong a minilaparotomy incision that almost negates the advantages of
laparoscopic technique. We recommend an extracorporeal approach for surgeons with not completed learning curve. With more experience, an
intracorporeal anastomosis is preferable.
Technical problems and dicult decision situ-
ation can occur in the following cases:
1. Anastomotic tension
2. “Blue” anastomosis
3. Anastomotic torsion or kinking
4. Small diameter by end-to-end technique
In all these situations, a creation of a new anastomosis is necessary. In doubts about the quality of
anastomosis, the indication to conversion should
be given generously.
An intracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis
will be performed most commonly with a linear
stapler side to side iso- or antiperistaltic. In
isoperistaltic technique, an enterotomy closure will
be performed with hand sewing. An enterotomy
aer antiperistaltic anastomosis will be closed with
a linear stapler. We performed no preoperative
colon cleansing for intracorporeal anastomosis.
An intraoperative testing of anastomotic leak
with coloscopy is laborious and not routinely recommended. But meticulous visual inspection of
all anastomotic segments is essential.
28.2.5 Removing of Specimen
e removing of specimen takes place via
minilaparotomy by extracorporeal anastomosis
technique or via a suprapubic approach by intracorporeal technique. Transumbilical, transvaginal
or transrectal removing is not established as a standard access for oncological surgery. Technical
problems and dicult situations may occur by
discrepancy between the size of specimen and
diameter of minilaparotomy. Because of a risk of
tumour cell dissemination, every “powerful” traction of specimen should be avoided. If necessary, a
minilaparotomy access can be adequately extended.
28.2.6 Classification of
Intraoperative Difficulties
e operative diculty for oncological right
hemicolectomy can be classied as summarised
in . Table 28.1.
. Table 28.1 Grading of operative difficulties for oncological right hemicolectomy
Grading Case type
I (ideal cases)
It is easy to operate; every operative
technique is technically unproblematic
II (not quite ideal)
Some minor technical difficulties may occur;
some operative techniques can be more
difficult as others
III (problematic)
Difficult to operate, some operative
techniques are considerably more difficult
than others
IV (very problematic)
Every operative step is very difficult
Slender or normal-weight patient
No previous abdominal surgery
Moderate obese patient (BMI around 30 kg/m
Cholecystectomy as a previous surgery
Otherwise similar to grade I
Overweight patient (BMI > 35 kg/m
Locally advanced tumours with:
Infiltration of the right flank peritoneum
Infiltration of the duodenum
Probable infiltration of mesenteric vessels or mesenteric root
Probable pancreatic infiltration
Previous oncological colorectal resection especially on
combination with radiotherapy
Previous extended upper abdomen surgery
Extreme form of grade III factors
2
)
2
)

235
Surgical Technique and
Difficult Situations from
Roberto Bergamaschi
(Laparoscopic)
SethA.Stein andRobertoC.M.Bergamaschi
29.1 Introduction – 236
29.2 Operating Room – 236
29.3 Surgical Technique – 236
29.4 Pros and Cons of Intracorporeal Ileocolic
Anastomoses – 239
29.4.1 Pros of Intracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis – 239
29.4.2 Cons of Intracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis – 239
29.4.3 Totally Stapled Versus Stapled/Handsewn
Intracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis – 240
29.4.4 Iso- Versus Antiperistaltic Intracorporeal Ileocolic
Anastomosis – 240
29.4.5 Should the Mesenteric Defect Be Closed? – 240
29
29.5 Conclusions – 240
29.6 T4 Tumors and Alteration of the Standardized
Surgical Approach – 240
References – 241
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017
M. Korenkov et al. (eds.), Gastrointestinal Operations and Technical Variations,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49878-1_29

236
S.A. Stein and R.C.M. Bergamaschi
29
29.1 Introduction
Although laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy was first reported in 1991 [5], descriptions of a standardized surgical technique
became available in recent years. The first,
termed laparoscopic facilitated, consisted of a
five-step lateral-to- medial approach with
extracorporeal vascular ligation and ileocolic
anastomosis [7]. The second, termed laparo-
scopic assisted, included eight steps with a
medial-to-lateral approach in which vascular
ligation was performed intracorporeally while
the anastomosis was fashioned extracorporeally [6]. Laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy entails ten steps with intracorporeal
anastomosis followed by specimen removal in
a bag [1].
29.2 Operating Room
Before starting the surgery, the patient is identified with a time-out prior to the induction of
general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Patients then undergo placement of a
nasogastric tube and urinary catheter. If the
patient cannot tolerate general anesthesia, the
procedure can be performed with a spinal or
epidural with the addition of a transverse
block. A mechanical bowel preparation is
achieved by using 2 l of polyethylene glycol
ingested orally during the day before surgery.
Adequate intravenous access should be
ensured. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics are given. Sequential compression devices
are applied to the legs. Patients are supine in a
bean bag with the right arm abducted and the
left arm tucked. The patient should be securely
strapped to the table at the chest since tilting
the table will be necessary. The abdomen is
prepped and draped sterile. The surgeon and
the scrub nurse stand on the patient’s left side,
and the assistant stands on the patient’s right
side (. Fig. 29.1) with equipment, including
monitors, being placed on the patient’s right
side in clear view of the surgeon. One assistant
is needed to control the camera unless a robotic
camera holder is available.
29.3 Surgical Technique
e abdomen and perineum are prepped and
draped sterilely. e instruments used are all
5mm in diameter and over 40cm long including
bowel graspers, scissors, right-angle forceps, and
needle holders. An electrosurgical vessel-sealing
device is used for division of vascular pedicles.
e peritoneal cavity is accessed in an open fashion at the umbilicus. A reusable 10 mm port is
placed at the umbilicus. A reusable 5mm port is
placed in the right lower quadrant lateral to the
rectus muscle sheath and at least 3cm medial to
the right anterior superior iliac spine. A disposable threaded 12 mm port is placed in the le
upper quadrant lateral to the rectus muscle sheath
and rostral to the umbilicus. A reusable 5mm
port is placed 3cm rostral to the pubic tubercle
just le to the midline. A 30° scope (10mm in
diameter) is placed at the umbilicus.
All steps of the operation are performed laparoscopically, including an intracorporeal handsewn anastomosis. e ten standardized sequential
steps include:
1. Identication and division of the ileocolic
vessels (. Fig. 29.2).
2. Identication of the right ureter (. Fig. 29.3a, b).
3. Continued dissection along the SMV in a ros-
tral direction to Henle’s gastrocolic trunk
(. Fig. 29.4).
4. Division of the omentum and opening of the
lesser sac (. Fig. 29.5).
5. Identication and division of the right branch
of the middle colic (. Fig. 29.6).
6. Transection of the proximal transverse colon
with a laparoscopic stapler (. Fig. 29.7).
7. Hepatic exure mobilization and mobiliza-
tion of the mesentery of the ascending colon
as well as division of the line of Toldt
(. Fig. 29.8).
8. e terminal ileum is transected with a laparo-
scopic stapler and held by the assistant to pre-
vent rotation of its mesentery (. Fig. 29.9).
9. e table is leveled from the le lateral tilt; the
antimesenteric side of the stapled ends of the
transverse colon and terminal ileum is approx-
imated by a stay suture tied intracorporeally
and then held by the assistant; an antimesen-
teric enterotomy and an antimesenteric colot-

Surgical Technique and Difficult Situations from Roberto Bergamaschi (Laparoscopic)
HEATING
CAMERA
HOLDER
237
ULTRASONIC
DEVICE
IRRIGATION
WATER
29
. Fig. 29.1 Operating room setup
. Fig. 29.2 Ligation of ileocolic vessels
SURGEON
SCRUB
NURSE
INSTRUMENTS
INSTRUMENTS
omy are made 10cm proximal and distal to the
stapled ends of the terminal ileum and transverse colon, respectively; a side-to-side anastomosis is fashioned with a laparoscopic stapler;
aer stapler extraction, the enterocolotomy is
closed by two layers of sutures tied intracorporeally (. Fig. 29.10a, b): the rst of which is a
continuous layer of 3-0 absorbable sutures and
the second is a layer of interrupted 3-0 silk
sutures; the mesenteric defect is le open.
10. e specimen is delivered in a bag through an
enlarged umbilical port site.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
