Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5516_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
92 NATURE THERAPY
Dr. Kellert promoted the idea of building structures with environmen­tally sensitive materials and designing structures to create an experi­ence with nature when indoors, looking out (Kellert et al. 2008).
Dr. Kellert’s most recent book was published posthumously and is a groundbreaking guide to understanding a changing perspective in the way we design and build the environment we live, work, and play in. The essays examine all aspects of the environment, from home and work to community and city, proposing that the future built world should foster the human-nature connection (Kellert 2018).
RELEVANT RESEARCH: QUANTIFYING THE EFFECT OF THERAPEUTIC HORTICULTURE INTERVENTIONS
The seminal 1984 study, “View Through a Window,” examining the restor­ative effect of a view of nature on surgical patients, was conducted by Roger Ulrich, Ph.D., a professor in the Department of Architecture and Centre for HealthcareArchitecture, Chalmers University of Technology, in Sweden. At an acute care hospital, Dr. Ulrich reviewed medical records for surgical patients who had gallbladder surgery over the course of a 9-year period. He and his team were able to narrow the field to 46 patients by identifying commonalities in the following characteristics: gender, age, smoker or nonsmoker, obesity or normal weight, and similar traits. In the postsurgical unit, exactly half the beds faced the sky and trees, and the other half faced a brick wall. The study was undertaken to determine whether having a view of nature would have a restorative effect. The re­searchers identified 23 patients with the natural view and paired them with 23 patients with the wall view. They extracted information from four areas in each medical chart in order to compare outcomes. Following are the findings of the “View Through a Window” study (Ulrich 1984).
• Patients with the view of nature were discharged almost 1 full day
sooner than those with the wall view.
• Patients with the view of nature needed a smaller amount and
strength of analgesic medication on days 3–5 (on the first 2 days and
last 2 days, the difference was insignificant).
• Nursing notes indicated more positive comments from the patients
with the natural view and more negative notes from the patients
Horticultural Therapy 93
with the wall view (notes documented mood, level of pain, and need for nursing attention).
• Patients with the view of nature had fewer requests for additional medication for anxiety or other minor postsurgical complications.
Another study by Dr. Ulrich showed that after 5 minutes of viewing
a scene with vegetation, stress levels decreased, evidenced by reduc­tions in blood pressure and muscle tension. He encouraged others in the field, including horticulturists and psychologists, to engage in on­going research by using physiological and health-related measure­ments to show tangible evidence of the important benefit of plants to improve well-being (Ulrich and Parsons 1992).
Environmental psychologist Rachel Kaplan, Ph.D., and her hus-
band, psychologist Stephen Kaplan, Ph.D., studied the restorative expe­rience of being in nature and the psychological benefit of being “nearby nature” (S. Kaplan 1992). The Kaplans defined “nearby nature” as vegetation that is experienced in a person’s ordinary day. It can be in­doors or outdoors or viewed through a window. After dozens of stud­ies, they found that having access to nature throughout a person’s daily life is an important factor in satisfaction and well-being at work, at home, or at play.
Dr. Stephen Kaplan’s work focused on the attention restoration theory,
which posits that people experience directed attention fatigue when en­gaged in prolonged mental effort. Furthermore, connecting with nearby nature restores the ability to direct attention or focus. The Kaplans con­tended that the availability of nearby nature is not an amenity or decora­tion but an essential human need because of its ability to reduce attention fatigue. A student studying, an office worker creating documents on a computer, or a patient staying in a hospital will each find relief from atten­tion fatigue if they can look around at images of nature or through a win­dow at a view of nature (R. Kaplan 1992; S. Kaplan 1992, 1995).
In the early twenty-first century, studies supporting the work of ear-
lier theorists and researchers have been published at a furious pace. Re­searchers from countries and cultures all over the globe are finding evidence of the physiological and psychological benefits of being in na­ture or nearby nature. For example, a 2011 study published in Public Health found decreased levels of cortisol and pulse rates in participants when walking in the forest (Lee et al. 2011). Another study discussed at length later in this chapter found decreased perception of stress, pain, depression, and loneliness (Figure 5–5) among veterans engaging in therapeutic horticulture activities such as the grounding activity shown in Figure 5–6 (Meore et al. 2021).
94 NATURE THERAPY
Therapeutic horticulture: before
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Extreme
distress
Extreme
pain
Extremely depressed
Extremely
lonely
No
distress
No
pain
No
loneliness
No
depression
1. Circle th e number on the “thermometer” that best describes the overall amount of stress you have felt over the past week
2. Circle the number on the “thermometer” that best describes how much your pain has interfered with your daily life inthe past week
3. Circle the number on the “thermometer” that best describes your overall mood in the past week
4. Circle the number on the “thermometer that best describes the overall amount of loneliness or isolation you have felt over the past week
Therapeutic horticulture: after
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Extreme
distress
Extreme
pain
Extremely
depressed
Extremely
lonely
No
distress
No
pain
No
loneliness
No
depression
1. Circle th e number on the “thermometer” that best describes the overall amount of stress you feel at this moment
2. Circle the number on the “thermometer” that best describes
how much your pain
has interfered with
moment
3. Circle the number on the “thermometer” that best describes your overall mood at this moment
4. Circle the number on the “thermometer” that best describes the overall amount of loneliness or isolation you feel at this moment
Figure 5–5. Participant-reported outcome thermometers for
the four symptom domains (stress, pain, mood, and social iso­lation) administered before and after each horticultural ther­apy session.
Source. Reprinted from Meore A, Sun S, Byma L, et al: “Pilot Evaluation of Horticultural Therapy in Improving Overall Wellness in Veterans With History of Suicidality.” Comple- mentary Therapies in Medicine 59:102728, 2021 33965561. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Horticultural Therapy 95
Figure 5–6. Therapeutic benefits of grounding incorporated
into the horticultural therapy process.
Source. Photograph courtesy of A. Meore.
HORTICULTURAL THERAPY AND THERAPEUTIC HORTICULTURE: COMMONALITIES AND DIFFERENCES
As the profession of horticultural therapy grows, the American Hor­ticultural Therapy Association continues to refine definitions and ter­minology as it works on developing a credentialing examination. The
96 NATURE THERAPY
American Horticultural Therapy Association has described commonal­ities and differences between horticultural therapy and therapeutic hor­ticulture, as illustrated in Figure 5–7.
Components of horticultural therapy include the following:
• The participant engages in horticulture-related activities.
• The participant has an identified disability, illness, or life circum­stance requiring services.
• The activity is facilitated by an HTR.
• The participation is in the context of an established therapeutic, re­habilitative, or vocational plan, which includes measurable goals and objectives, assessment, and documentation (Haller et al. 2019).
Components of therapeutic horticulture include the following:
• The participant engages in horticulture-related activities.
• The participant has an identified disability, illness, or life circum­stance requiring services.
• The activity is facilitated by an HTR or other professional therapist with training in horticulture.
• The participation is in the context of the goals and mission of an orga­nization or the needs of the individual or group and may include health maintenance, well-being, and leisure activity (Haller et al. 2019).
Although there are distinct differences in who is conducting the
intervention and for what purpose, there is a strong overlap in the methods and materials used in horticultural therapy and therapeutic horticulture practice. Similar to humanistic psychology, both horticul­tural therapy and therapeutic horticulture are person-centered prac­tices, and the needs and goals of the individual are the driving force of the intervention. With the patient considered to be at the center of the relationship, the therapist’s role in both modalities is to guide and facil­itate the engagement with the plant or natural materials, making mod­ifications or adaptations in order to achieve the desired outcome and considering safety in every step of the process.
Both horticultural therapy and therapeutic horticulture can be
practiced in diverse and wide-ranging settings, from hospitals and spe­cialized residential communities for people with developmental dis­abilities, older adults, or others with a specific therapeutic need to correctional facilities, botanical gardens, schools, and community set­tings (Table 5–1). Programs can be divided into three types: therapeutic, psychosocial, and educational and vocational.
Horticultural Therapy 97
Horticultural therapyTherapeutic horticulture
The activity is facilitated
by a registered horticultural
therapist or other
professional with training
in horticulture.
The participationisinthe
context of the goals and
mission of the program.
Participant engages in
a horticultural activity.
The participant has an
identied disability, illness,
or life circumstance
necessitating services.
The activity is facilitated
by a registered
horticultural therapist.
The participationisin
the context of an
established therapeutic,
rehabilitative, or vocational
plan.
Figure 5–7. Components of therapeutic horticulture and horticultural therapy.
Source. Definitions have been adapted from P. D’Amico, HTM, Program Coordinator, NYBG Horticultural Therapy Certificate Program. American Horti­cultural Therapy Association: “Definitions and Positions.” 2021. Available at: id=86:ahta-definitions-and-positions&catid=20:site-content&Itemid=152.
htt
ps://w
ww.ahta.or
g/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&
98 NATURE THERAPY
Table 5–1 . Populations and settings for therapeutic
horticulture interventions
Community (social)
Drug and alcohol
rehabilitation support groups
Community
gardens
Community
centers
Religious
communities Public parks LGBTQ+ youths LGBTQ+ families Farms Food-insecure
neighborhoods Refugee
communities BIPOC
communities Day habilitation
programs Corporate and
other worksites
Note. BIPOC=Black, Indigenous, and people of color.
Residential (social)
Retirement
communities
Assisted living
facilities
Skilled nursing
facilities Halfway houses Community-
based group
homes Supported
independent
living Developmental
disability
centers Residential
schools Farms Correctional
facilities Urban
neighborhoods Patients’ homes Homeless shelters Foster homes Domestic
violence shelters
Educational and vocational
Vocational school Special needs
school
At-risk youth
detention center
Mainstream
school (public and private)
Incarceration
program Religious school Garden center
vocational
program Prison vocational
training
program Schools for
autistic persons
Medical
Acute care
hospital
Physical medicine
and rehabilitation
hospital Pediatric hospital Psychiatric
hospital Long-term care
facility Intermediate care
facility Cancer care Memory care Hospice care Practitioner’s
office
• Therapeutic programs follow a medical model. The focus is on re­covery from illness, injury, or life circumstances that negatively af­fect a person’s health.
• Psychosocial programs follow a wellness model. The focus is on in­troducing a valuable leisure activity that can provide the benefit of overall well-being and improved physical, mental, and spiritual health.
• Educational and vocational programs follow an educational model. The focus is on learning new, meaningful skills in the physical, cog-
Horticultural Therapy 99
nitive, and psychosocial realms that could lead to higher levels of education, job placement, volunteering, or making a meaningful contribution to the community (Haller 1998).
With hortophilia at the core of the therapeutic horticulture practice, horticultural therapists maintain that every patient has the capacity to tap into their innate connection with plants and benefit from the active process of engaging with them, as shown in Figure 5–8. However, peo­ple who are so removed from plants and nature as to be described as “nature deficient” (Louv 2008) and averse to nature might need a slow introduction to becoming aware of their connection with the natural world. In such cases, a passive nature experience, such as watching a garden-related video, sampling the scents of the garden, or having a talk session while walking or seated in a garden or park, might be an important first step in providing exposure to nature. With this type of incremental approach, it is likely that plants eventually can be success­fully introduced to such a person.
GUIDELINES FOR THE PRACTICAL USE OF THERAPEUTIC HORTICULTURE
The process of engaging in a horticulture-related activity distinguishes therapeutic horticulture from other nature therapies. The practice is flexible and adaptable and is an appropriate resource to address issues in nearly every functional domain (e.g., physical, cognitive, psycholog­ical, social, emotional, spiritual, vocational, recreational) (Table 5–2).
Therapeutic horticulture is generally practiced as an active experi­ence, and the patient’s relationship with the plant can be multisensory. In the richest sensory environment, this would take place in an outdoor garden bursting with diversity, color, scent, texture, and four-season in­terest. Other types of outdoor gardens, parks, yards, or even small apartment balconies are adequate spaces in which to engage in a thera­peutic treatment session outdoors. An indoor area with plants also may be an appropriate therapeutic setting (e.g., in a greenhouse, atrium, or naturally lit room in an office, school, or residence). The beauty of the people-plant relationship is that even in a room with one plant, a person can have a meaningful, therapeutic experience in relationship with that plant under the guidance of a skilled practitioner. If the care and culture
100 NATURE THERAPY
Figure 5–8. Thinning seedlings as an exercise in mindful na-
ture engagement.
Source. Photograph courtesy of A. Meore.
of plants will be a component of the therapeutic practice, it is recom­mended that the practitioner have at least a rudimentary knowledge of horticulture and be familiar with the activity, tools, plants, and materi­als that will be used.
Horticultural Therapy 101
Table 5–2. Potential beneficial outcomes of therapeutic
horticulture interventions
Psychological Cognitive domain
and emotional
domain
Psychosocial domain
Physical domain
Develop new
interests Learn new skills Learn new
vocabulary Practice following
single-step and
multistep
instructions Practice
sequential tasks Practice goal
setting Stimulate
curiosity and
questioning Exercise short-
and long-term
memory recall Improve
sustained
focused
attention Improve divided
attention Enhance the
understanding
of abstract
concepts
including time,
growth, change,
and death Increase
awareness of
our living
environment Experience an
opportunity to
feel a sense of
wonder and
“being away”
Cultivate well-
being
Reduce stress and
anxiety
Reduce
restlessness
Practice
mindfulness
Improve self-
confidence and
self-esteem Improve mood Nurture another
living thing Explore self-
expression
through a
creative plant-
based activity Develop a sense
of responsibility
to others and to
our
environment Practice delayed
gratification and
patience Lift spirits for
those who have
lost a sense of
purpose or hope Provide a feeling
of satisfaction at
accomplishing a
set goal Help to relieve
feelings of
depression
Decrease isolation Increase
socialization
Promote
interaction through a common interest
Practice and
improve socialization skills
Practice group
participation
Practice turn-
taking, sharing, and teamwork
Provide
opportunities to practice leadership skills
Provide an
opportunity to experience wonder
Provide an
opportunity to observe life cycles
Provide an
opportunity to make metaphoric comparisons to self
Exercise fine
motor skills
Increase strength
and dexterity in hands and fingers
Increase strength
and range of motion at upper extremities
Exercise gross
motor skills (e.g., increase strength and range of motion at lower extremities and core and improve coordination, balance, and stability)
Provide moderate
exercise, helping to increase coordination, strength, stamina, and endurance
Provide
opportunity for sensory stimulation (vision, hearing, touch, taste, and smell)
Provide outdoor
activity and access to fresh air and sunshine