Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_832_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
glycemic control is optimized. Patients should not shave themselves prior to sur­gery, as this results in small wounds that may increase risk of infection.
401
4 Mesh Choice andPreparation
There exists a large variety of prosthetic mesh options for hernia repair. Evidence suggests that monolament, macroporous mesh is optimal for hernia repair. Monolament bers minimize surface area and crevices that may harbor bacterial contamination, and macroporous mesh allows for wider areas for natural tissue ingrowth and exibility while minimizing the amount of foreign material implanted over a given surface area, minimizing infectious risk and postoperative discomfort. Polypropylene and polyester are both suitable inert mesh materials [4]. Lightweight mesh is preferred, as this results in a repair of adequate strength and with recurrence rates equivalent to heavier mesh, but with lower rates of post-operative discomfort and pain [5]. A mesh of 7.5×15cm is used to achieve complete coverage of the inguinal oor. The mesh is trimmed to approximate to the inguinal ligament and rectus sheath in a rounded shape at its medial corner.
5 Operative Technique
5.1 Positioning andPreparation
Patients are positioned supine with preparation of skin from the umbilicus to the scrotum, which should be included in the eld in the case of large inguinoscrotal hernias. Perioperative antibiotics are not required for clean, elective cases, but may be benecial in high-risk environments or in the setting of bilateral inguinal hernia repairs or recurrent hernias [4].
5.2 Anesthesia andSedation
Our preferred technique for sedation is local anesthesia with monitored sedation for adults with reducible inguinal hernias. Local anesthesia is safe, effective, low cost, and allows for quicker return to normal for patients without the side effects of gen­eral anesthesia. A 50:50 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine is our preferred local anesthetic. In the setting of incarcer­ated hernias, large inguinoscrotal hernias, or recurrent hernias, general or spinal anesthesia may be benecial.
402
https://t.me/med1917
Z. N. Weitzner et al.
5.3 Operative Steps
After the skin is prepped and draped, an incision is marked from the pubic tubercle extending 5-6cm laterally following Langer lines to the deep ring. Local anesthesia is injected both intradermally and in the deep subcutaneous tissue. The skin is incised sharply and cautery is used to dissect down to the external oblique aponeu­rosis. Another 10mL of local anesthetic is injected through the external oblique aponeurosis into the inguinal canal to lift the external oblique bers off the underly­ing nerves and cord structures, and to provide local anesthetic to the ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve (Fig.1).
The external oblique aponeurosis is incised over the entire canal. The divided edges of external oblique aponeurosis are then grasped with clamps and retracted to expose the spermatic cord and inguinal oor (Fig.2). In order to provide adequate mesh overlap of the inguinal oor, the external oblique aponeurosis should be opened at least 3cm superior to the inguinal oor. The ilioinguinal and iliohypogas­tric nerves are next identied and protected. The ilioinguinal nerve is most often found medial to the anterior superior iliac spine, running over the cord and then exiting the external ring. The iliohypogastric nerve is typically found emanating from the internal oblique aponeurosis and running medially through the canal towards the medial ap of the external oblique aponeurosis. It is important to keep in mind that there is signicant variation to nerve courses.
Using a gauze Kittner dissector, the spermatic cord is atraumatically separated from the inguinal oor and pubic tubercle. This is continued approximately 2cm inferiorly past the tubercle. Care should be taken to avoid trauma to the cremasteric bers and their contents. Retraction of the cord may be achieved by passage of a Penrose drain around the cord (Fig.3). After isolation of the cord, the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve may be identied where it courses alongside the blue
Fig. 1 Injection of local anesthetic through the bers of the external oblique aponeurosis, inltrating the inguinal canal
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2 The external oblique bers are incised and retracted to expose the spermatic cord and inguinal oor
403
Fig. 3 The spermatic cord and ilioinguinal nerve are isolated using a Penrose drain
404
https://t.me/med1917
Z. N. Weitzner et al.
streak of the external spermatic vein, located lateral and posterior in the cord. Ideal practice is to identify and protect all three major nerves during dissection. Any nerves noted to be injured may be managed with “pragmatic neurectomy,” which involves ligating the nerve ending and burying it in the muscle belly. This practice helps avoid neuroma formation and minimizes development of post-operative neuropathic pain.
To assess for the presence of an indirect sac, the proximal cremaster bers are divided longitudinally and the cord contents are explored. Any indirect hernia sac present is dissected free from cord structures until the sac is completely isolated to the level of the neck of the sac (Fig.4). The sac is then inverted into the abdomen. Ligation and excision of the sac is acceptable, but does not improve outcomes.
The oor is then examined for a direct hernia. If a large direct hernia sac is pres­ent, this may be inverted into the abdomen and a sutured closure of the transversalis fascia of the inguinal oor may be performed to improve mesh positioning.
Assessment for a coexisting femoral hernia may be performed by opening the hernia sac or inguinal oor. If present, a femoral hernia may be repaired by modify­ing the mesh to extend to Cooper’s ligament.
The 7.5×15cm piece of mesh is cut to the appropriate shape as described above. This is then sutured to the pubic tubercle using permanent monolament suture. The suture should not extend into the periosteum, as this can increase pain. Medially, the mesh should overlap the pubic tubercle by 2 cm. This overlap protects against medial recurrence as the mesh contracts over time. The same permanent suture is then used in running fashion to x the mesh to the inguinal ligament (Fig.5). This suture line runs from tubercle to just lateral to the deep inguinal ring.
Fig. 4 An indirect hernia sac is dissected free to the level of the neck of the sac
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 The lateral edge of the mesh is sutured to the inguinal ligament using running permanent monolament suture
405
Two tails are created in the lateral portion of the mesh by cutting a slit along the long dimension of the mesh. The inferior tail should be approximately half the width of the superior tail. The superior tail is passed under the spermatic cord, posi­tioning the spermatic cord between the two mesh tails.
The medial and superior borders of the mesh are then sutured to the anterior rectus sheath and aponeurotic portion the internal oblique (Fig.6). The iliohypogas­tric nerve should be identied and avoided during this process. The use of inter­rupted absorbable sutures minimizes risk to this nerve and its branches. Leaving these interrupted stitches loose may also reduce the chance of nerve injury. These medial interrupted sutures proceed superiorly to the level of the deep inguinal ring.
The nal step of mesh placement is to recreate the internal ring by overlapping the superior tail of the mesh over the inferior tail just lateral to the spermatic cord. These tails are then sutured to the inguinal ligament using permanent monolament suture (Fig.7). A new mesh internal ring of appropriate size will allow for uncon­structed passage of the spermatic cord, but will not be so loose as to accommodate the passage of a nger.
The lateral mesh tails may be trimmed, but should extend a minimum of 5cm beyond the mesh deep inguinal ring. Next, the tails are positioned at underneath the external oblique aponeurosis (Fig.8). The external oblique is closed over the cord and mesh with running absorbable suture, ultimately creating a new external inguinal ring.
Absorbable suture is used to reapproximate the subcutaneous tissues and the skin.
406
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 6 The medial border of the mesh is sutured to the anterior rectus sheath and conjoint tendon using interrupted absorbable sutures
Z. N. Weitzner et al.
Fig. 7 The lateral mesh tails are overlapped to surround the spermatic cord, forming a new deep inguinal ring
Lichtenstein Tension-Free Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 8 In its nal orientation, the mesh covers the entire inguinal oor and extends at least 5cm lateral to the inguinal ring
407
6 Post-operative Management
Lichtenstein hernia repair is typically an outpatient procedure. Oral analgesic medi­cations are appropriate. Immediate post-operative resumption of normal cardiovas­cular activities is encouraged. It is not our practice to place restrictions on vigorous exercise and heavy lifting post-operatively for recurrence prevention, but these may be advised for reasons of comfort.
7 Discussion andConclusion
Success in hernia surgery requires detailed knowledge of the relevant anatomy and the ability to perform the repair technique most appropriate for clinical circum­stances. It is crucial to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each tech­nique. In 2018, the HerniaSurge Group published updated consensus guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adults [4]. Based on data from the latest random­ized controlled trials (RCTs), the use of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty for repair of primary, unilateral, symptomatic inguinal hernias is strongly
408
https://t.me/med1917
Z. N. Weitzner et al.
recommended by the HerniaSurge guidelines. This technique is considered superior to the Bassini and Shouldice methods of tissue repair [69].
The Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair has the benets of being effective, low cost and possible to perform under local anesthesia. The outcomes of recur­rence, post-operative pain, chronic pain, and other complications compare equiva­lently or favorably to other repair techniques. For repair of initial, unilateral inguinal hernias and in patients wishing to avoid the risks of general anesthesia, the Lichtenstein hernia repair remains an excellent option.
References
1. Hori T, Yasukawa D.Fascinating history of groin hernias: comprehensive recognition of anat-
omy, classic considerations for herniorrhaphy, and current controversies in hernioplasty. World
J Methodol. 2021;11(4):160–86. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.160.
2. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG.Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept,
introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg. 1986;71(1):1–4.
3. Amid PK. Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles.
Hernia. 2004;8(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029- 003- 0160- y.
4. HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia.
2018;22(1):1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029- 017- 1668- x.
5. Amid PK. Classication of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall
hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426382.
6. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair proce-
dures—PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9749850/. Accessed 17 July 2023.
7. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G.Randomized trial of Lichtenstein
versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):45–9. https://
doi.org/10.1046/j.0007- 1323.2001.01960.x.
8. Danielsson P, Isacson S, Hansen MV. Randomised study of Lichtenstein compared with
Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(1):49–53.
https://doi.org/10.1080/110241599750007504.
9. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on
the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s10029- 009- 0529- 7.
Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia
https://t.me/med1917
Repair: TAPP, TEP, andeTEP Approaches
AdamT.Lucy andMargauxN.Mustian
1 Introduction
Inguinal hernias are one of the most common problems seen in surgical clinics and are among the most common general surgical operations performed worldwide [1, 2]. Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair has become an increasingly utilized approach to inguinal hernias in recent decades, and is an excellent option for bilateral hernias or for women with hernias [3]. There are several minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair options available for surgeons, including transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and extended totally extrapertioneal (eTEP). With the TAPP approach, mesh is placed between the abdominal wall and the perito­neum in the preperitoneal space via access to the abdominal cavity via laparoscopic or robotic approach. This introduces the risk of any intraperitoneal surgery, including iatrogenic injury to abdominal viscera and future adhesive disease. In contrast, the TEP and eTEP techniques create a preperitoneal space without entering the abdominal cavity. However, viscera adherent to the peritoneum remain at potential risk of injury.
2 Preoperative Setup
Preoperative setup remains the same for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair regardless of approach: TAPP, TEP, or eTEP.The patient is instructed to void on call to the operating room and if successful, intraoperative bladder decompression is not
A. T. Lucy · M. N. Mustian (*) Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA e-mail: alucy@uabmc.edu; mmustian@uabmc.edu
Switzerland AG 2024 H. Chen, B. Lindeman (eds.), Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63878-7_35
409© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
410
https://t.me/med1917
routinely performed. However, for large defects containing bladder or large bilateral hernias, foley catheter placement may be considered. The patient is positioned supine with the arms tucked to the side. Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics are administered within 30min of incision and lower extremity pneumatic compression stockings are utilized for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. The abdomen and groin areas are prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion.
A. T. Lucy and M. N. Mustian
2.1 Minimally Invasive Transabdominal Preperitoneal
Approach (TAPP)
2.1.1 Abdominal Entry andPort Placement
Abdominal entry may be achieved through a variety of techniques according to surgeon preference. We will describe our typical approaches below.
For robotic assisted laparoscopic cases: Veress needle insufation is achieved at Palmer’s point and pneumoperitoneum is established to 15mmHg. Local anes­thesia is injected along each port placement site prior to incision. Abdominal entry is performed rst via Optiview technique superior to the umbilicus approximately 15cm above the pubis. Two additional 8mm trochars are placed along the upper abdomen on either side under direct visualization. The patient is placed in Trendelenburg position and the robot is docked to the cannulas after the pelvis is inspected.
For laparoscopic cases: The surgeon and assistant should position themselves optimally for operating in the inferior abdomen and pelvis. The room and equip­ment should be organized to allow clear line of sight to a single monitor which is placed at the patients feet. Abdominal entry can again be performed via veress, optiview, or Hasson technique with a 12mm port placed near the umbilicus. Two additional 5mm ports are then placed at the right and left midclavicular lines at the level of the umbilicus. The patient is then placed in trendelenburg position and both groins are inspected.
2.1.2 Hernia Evaluation
Looking in the inferior abdomen and anteriorly, the hernias are identied by the sac extending through the defect(s) in the abdominal wall in the indirect or direct space as well the epigastric vessels behind their covering of parietal peritoneum (Fig.1). It should be noted, however, that the absence of a visualized hernia defect on peri­toneoscopic view does not fully exclude a hernia containing extraperitoneal fat. The peritoneum is then incised from the median umbilical fold laterally. The incision should be created cephalad to the groin defect and care should be taken not to injure the epigastric vessels which lie just anterior to the peritoneum at this location. At the