Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_832_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
368
https://t.me/med1917
C. Choi
also benet from a postoperative antibiotic course. If there is adequate drainage, then clinical improvement should be seen within 24h, with decreased pain and decreasing leukocytosis. Depending on the depth of the cavity, drains can reas­sessed in the outpatient setting about 7days later. Factors such as drainage volume can help with decision of slow removal (requiring re-suturing the drain at the skin after partial removal) versus complete removal. Sitz baths or wound irrigation is encouraged. Bowel regimen including ber supplement is also important to maintain.
References
1. Carmichael JC, Mills S.Anatomy and embryology of the colon, rectum, and anus. In: ASCRS
textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Cham: Springer; 2016.
2. Davis BR, Kasten KR.Anorectal abscess and stula. In: ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal
surgery. Cham: Springer; 2016.
3. Vasilevsky C-A. Anorectal abscess and stula. In: The ASCRS manual of colon and rectal
surgery. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer; 2014.
4. Kiran RP.Anorectal abscess. In: Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. 3rd ed. Amsterdam:
Elsevier; 2017.
5. Bolshinsky V, Trunzo J.Anorectal abscess. In: Cleveland clinic illustrated tips and tricks in
colon and rectal surgery. Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
6. Gaertner WB, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice
Guidelines for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal
Fistula. Diseases of Colon and Rectum. 2022.
Figures References
1. Reference from ASCRS Textbook edition 3: # 168. Vasilevsky CA.Anorectal abscess and s-
tula- in ano. In: Beck DE, editor. Handbook of colorectal surgery. St Louis: Quality Medical
Publishing; 1997. SAME FIGURE also in the ASCRS Manual of CRS.
2. Fig.1.7—ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, anatomy and embryology of the colon,
rectum, and anus—Joseph C.Carmichael, Steven Mills.
Anorectal Fistula Repair
https://t.me/med1917
SowmyaSharma andJuliaT.Saraidaridis
1 Introduction
The treatment of anal stula has been a challenging problem for both surgeons and patients for millennia. This is due to a combination of factors including the hetero­geneity of the condition, the complexity of the anatomy, and the continued failure of available methods to consistently cure the condition. Hippocrates described using a horse-hair cutting seton in 400 and we are still beset by the same challenges he faced [1].
Perianal sepsis begins with abscess formation, most commonly secondary to cryptoglandular infection. The glands within the anal canal can become obstructed resulting in stasis of glandular secretions and eventual abscess formation. In addi­tion to cryptoglandular etiologies of anal stula, stulae can arise from Crohn’s disease, radiation injury, malignancy, trauma, iatrogenesis, tuberculosis, and other more rare infections. Following abscess formation, the abscess will either spontane­ously drain or require surgical drainage. 30–50% of the time an abscess will result in the development of an epithelialized tract connecting the abscess cavity to an epithelialized surface (perianal skin), referred to as anal stula.
Classication of anal stulae is via Parks’ classication, which includes inter­sphincteric, trans-sphincteric, supra-sphincteric, and extra-sphincteric stulae. Other important distinctions when considering stula repair is whether the stula is low versus high dened as the amount of involvement of external anal sphincter. High trans-sphincteric stulae are dened as those involving greater than 25–30% of the external anal sphincter. Complex anal stulas include high trans-sphincteric
S. Sharma · J. T. Saraidaridis (*) Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA e-mail: Sowmya.Sharma@lahey.org; Julia.T.Saraidaridis@Lahey.org
Switzerland AG 2024 H. Chen, B. Lindeman (eds.), Illustrative Handbook of General Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63878-7_31
369© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
370
https://t.me/med1917
stulae, supra-sphincteric stulae, extra-sphincteric stulae, horseshoe stulae, inammatory bowel disease (IBD) related stulous disease, stulae in the setting of radiation, and malignant stulae [2].
The overarching goals of stula repair are twofold: rst to repair the stula and second to preserve continence. The choice of procedure as to how to accomplish these goals is dependent on the location and complexity of stula.
S. Sharma and J. T. Saraidaridis
2 Pre-operative Preparation
Prior to undergoing surgical repair of their anal stula, patients require a disease specic history and physical. Questions should focus on the history of the stula, bowel habits, presence of incontinence, previous anorectal surgery, obstetric his­tory, colon cancer screening, personal history of IBD, and family history of IBD.It is very important to have a good baseline understanding of the patient’s continence status. Validated questionnaires like the Wexner score, FIQL, FISI, and Vaizey score can be helpful in characterizing continence [3]. In addition, pre-operative acquisi­tion of this data provides a baseline from which to track continence following s­tula repair.
Following a disease specic history, patient should undergo an anorectal physi­cal exam in the ofce with the caveat that a robust examination will likely require exam under anesthesia. A close visual examination of their perineum should be performed assessing for external openings, previous scars, thinning of the perineal body, and signs of perianal Crohn’s disease. Following visual examination, a digital rectal exam should be performed to provide a rough estimate of sphincter strength. Sphincter strength should be assessed at rest and during squeeze. If anoscopy is available in the ofce, it should be performed, but this can also be deferred for planned exam under anesthesia and seton placement.
Following a presumed diagnosis of stula, the rst step of treatment is to delin­eate the perianal anatomy with an exam under anesthesia (EUA). In most cases, anal stula diagnosis is a clinical one without need for imaging; however, in cer­tain cases, particularly when there is concern for complex or multiple stulae, MRI can be obtained to aid with operative planning [4]. But for the vast majority of stula, patients should be brought to the operating room for an initial EUA to delineate anatomy and draining seton placement without any need of additional imaging.
Bowel preparation for the operating room can be a single eet enema adminis­tered 1 h prior to procedure. In patient whom colon cancer screening is overdue or there is concern for Crohn’s disease, a colonoscopy can be performed as part of the EUA procedure with subsequent need for preoperative bowel preparation with mechanical bowel prep.
Anorectal Fistula Repair
https://t.me/med1917
371
2.1 Procedures
2.1.1 Initial EUA/Seton Placement
Following identication of the clinical suspicion for stula, the patient is brought to the operating room for EUA.Patients can be positioned in lithotomy or jacknife prone depending on surgeon preference. EUA can be done under monitored anes­thesia care (MAC) or general anesthesia depending on patient factors and anesthesia provider preference. Pre-operative antibiotics are not indicated for prophylaxis, and are usually given only in setting of active infection in diabetic or immunocompro­mised patients, or patients with concern for systemic infection. VTE prophylaxis is not indicated unless the patient is in a high risk group.
All exams are initiated with a exible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy depending on age and risk factors for malignancy and IBD.Flexible sigmoidoscopy allows assessment of the rectum for proctitis to help exclude Crohn’s Disease.
The perineum is examined again fully to evaluate for external openings, previous scars, thinning of the perineal body, and signs of perianal Crohn’s disease. Given the location of the external opening, hypotheses regarding the location of the internal opening can be made using Goodsall’s rule. Goodsall’s rule uses the location of the external opening to predict the location of the internal opening. If an external open­ing is anterior to the line dividing the anus in the coronal plane, the internal opening is radial to the nearest anal crypt. If it is posterior to the coronal plane, it curves to the posterior midline. However, recent studies have shown that Goodsall’s rule accurately predicted the course of stulas with a posterior opening, but only pre­dicted 49% of the anterior ones. The same authors suggest that the midline is more prevalent for both anterior and posterior stulae [5, 6].
Anoscopy is performed to evaluate for the internal opening. Special attention is made to evaluate for hemorrhoidal tissue, ssure, and inammation. With the ano­scope inserted, the external opening is gently probed to connect the external to the internal opening. Sometimes, the tract is not easily delineated with probing. Care must be taken not to force the probe so as to create a false tract. If the tract is not easily apparent, these authors suggest instillation of half strength hydrogen perox­ide into the external opening to elucidate the internal opening. Complicated tracts may require a stepwise approach where the incision is extended only as far as the probe can be safely passed; once the tract has been partially opened, the probe is advanced accordingly as the direction of the tract becomes apparent. Once the probe is in the stula tract, the stula can be characterized by the Parks classication scheme: intersphincteric, transsphincteric, suprasphincteric, or extrasphincteric. The relation of the stula to the sphincter muscle determines this classication. Estimates as to how much involvement of the external anal sphincter assist in deter­mining the complexity of the stula and the appropriateness for certain types of repair. Typically patients who have <25% of the external anal sphincter encircled by
372
https://t.me/med1917
S. Sharma and J. T. Saraidaridis
the stula are appropriate for simple stulotomy, whereas “high” trans-sphincteric stulae are not candidates for that “repair.” Overall sphincter strength should be determined as well. Patients with weak tone should have very little derangement to the sphincter complex if possible.
Unless the patient is determined a candidate for simple stulotomy (<25% of sphincter involved in a patient with good strength sphincter), a non-cutting or drain­age seton should be placed (Fig.1). Drainage setons are performed by attaching a silk tie to the probe and pulling it through the stula. The silk tie is then attached to silastic band and the silastic band pulled through the stula. The two ends of the silastic band are then connected using additional silk ties. The draining seton should not be so tight as to become a cutting seton or so loose as to cause difculties with catching on clothes or toilet paper. A draining seton can be left in place indenitely for patients who are not candidates for more complex procedures or for those who prefer the seton to the risk of incontinence with other procedures.
Following placement of a draining seton, it is the authors’ preference to wait 2–3months minimum before proceeding with a denitive stula repair procedure.
Fig. 1 Seton in place
Anorectal Fistula Repair
https://t.me/med1917
373
Denitive Fistula Repair Procedures
Prior to denitive stula repair, patients should be counselled regarding realistic expectations of the likelihood of success of their operation. For most sphincter spar­ing operations, approximately 60–70% are successful and 5–10% of patients report some decrement in their continence. Following informed consent, patients are read­ied for the operating room. It is unclear what bowel preparation is ideal for stula repair. Options include enema versus full mechanical bowel preparation. Most sur­geons do use preoperative antibiotics and VTE prophylaxis is preserved for those with long surgeries or strong risk factors.
Patients can be positioned in lithotomy or jacknife prone depending on surgeon preference. At the authors’ institution, stulotomy and stulectomy are often per­formed in lithotomy, whereas LIFT and advancement ap are performed in the prone position.
2.1.2 Fistulotomy
Inter-sphincteric and low trans-sphincteric stulae are both candidates for primary or secondary stulotomy. In this procedure, once the stula tract is identied with a probe, the stula is laid open over the probe using cautery. The edges of the stula tract can be marsupialized which decreases healing time (but does not decrease recurrence risk) [7]. When appropriately used, over 90% success rates are seen with this procedure, with low incontinence rates [8]. Recurrence or persistence of the stula occurs when the edges heal back over the base of the wound. Occasionally, a stula is not thought to be appropriate for stulotomy during initial identication, but then is deemed appropriate on planned operation for denitive stula repair. In that setting, a secondary stulotomy can be performed. It is thought that the out­comes from secondary stulotomy are slightly improved compared to primary s­tulotomy given the amount of brosis already present from the seton.
2.1.3 Cutting Seton
A cutting seton can be used for supercial trans-sphincteric stulas to perform a gradual stulotomy. The overlying skin and subcutaneous tissue are laid open, and a silk tie seton is placed in the stula tract as described above, and tied tightly around the tract in the muscle. The slow erosion of the seton into the muscle allows brosis and eventually healing of the tract. This technique requires routine ofce visits with seton tightening until the process is complete.
374
https://t.me/med1917
S. Sharma and J. T. Saraidaridis
2.1.4 Fistulectomy
Fistulectomy involves excision of the stula tract (from external opening to internal opening). It does not require probing of the stula for successful repair, but does have signicant tissue destruction. It is only effective for well-dened stula tracts. The external opening should be cored out using an elliptical incision and the stula tissue grasped. Dissection is then performed along the tract to remove the entire tract from the body. Careful attention should be paid to minimizing damage to the sphincter complex. Once the stula tract is removed, the internal opening is closed with either simple stitches or an advancement ap.
2.1.5 Ligation ofInter-sphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT)
LIFT is a sphincter sparing option for trans-sphincteric stulae that was developed in 2007 [9]. The seton is removed and a probe placed into the stula tract (Fig.2). A curvilinear incision is made above the intersphincteric plane (Fig.3). The inter­sphincteric plane is then dissected and developed isolating the stula taking care not to enter into the stula tract (Fig.4). Once the stula tract is clearly identied, it is
Fig. 2 Fistula probe in stula
Anorectal Fistula Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 3 Marking incision
375
Fig. 4 Encircling stula tract
encircled. Ties are placed on either side of the tract (on the side of the internal and external sphincter muscles) (Fig.5). Each side is ligated (Fig.5). Suture ligations can be used if the ties fall off. The external side can be tested with dilute hydrogen
376
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Silk ties on either side of tract
S. Sharma and J. T. Saraidaridis
peroxide to ensure the closure is water tight. The internal opening is curetted and the internal opening is closed with a gure-of-eight stitch. The dissection cavity is closed with interrupted vicryls and the skin is closed loosely with interrupted vicryl suture (Fig. 6). Reported success of the LIFT ranges from 50% to 94% [911] (Fig.7).
2.1.6 Endoanal Advancement Flap
The endoanal advancement ap was rst proposed by Noble in 1902 [12]. In this procedure, the anus is held open using a Lone star device and a Park’s anal retractor. A tongue shaped ap is lifted in the anal mucosa. The ap consists of mucosa, sub­mucosa and part of internal anal sphincter. The inferior portion of the “U” of the ap is 10mm distal to the internal opening. It is imperative to raise a ap with adequate blood supply. Once the ap has been raised, the portion containing the internal
Anorectal Fistula Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 6 Tying silks
377
opening is trimmed. The internal opening is then closed at the level of the muscle. The closure is leak tested from the external opening with dilute hydrogen peroxide. The ap is then sutured over the closure of the muscle. Advancement aps have been shown to have high rates of success (60–70%); however, they do carry a small risk of incontinence (10–20%) [13, 14].
2.1.7 Other Options
There are a plethora of other historical procedures used for denitive stula repair including brin glue, stula plug, stulotomy and immediate reconstruction, and Fistula-tract Laser Closure. Both brin glue and stula plug, while initially very appealing given their sphincter preservation, have fallen out of favour given poor success rates.