Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_832_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
164
https://t.me/med1917
A. L. Shada
2 Classication
Paraesophageal hernias occur when the esophageal hiatus is disrupted causing progressive migration of abdominal contents (often the gastric fundus, occasionally
other adjacent organs) into the chest cavity. PEH is a disease of the diaphragm and/
or phrenoesophageal ligament and can be regarded separately from GERD which is
a disease of the gastroesophageal valve. Similar to other muscular hernias (ie: groin
hernias), enlargement of the hiatal defect leads to attenuation and atrophy of surrounding diaphragm muscle and thinning of the peritoneum. This creates a hernia
sac. This sac includes an anterior component (made up of phrenoesophageal ligament plus abdominal peritoneum) and a posterior component (made up of phrenoesophageal ligament plus retroperitoneum and lesser gastric sac). The blood supply
of the stomach within both the gastrohepatic omentum as well as the greater omentum also migrates upward as the hernia enlarges. Thinning out of the phrenoesophageal ligament, coupled with the intrathoracic negative pressure, can allow the
stomach to progressively move up into the mediastinum. The stomach can create
adhesions in the mediastinum that leads to incarceration of the stomach in a volvulized position and lead to outlet obstruction.
There are four types of hiatal hernias (Fig.1): sliding hiatal hernia (type I), and
para-esophageal hernias types II, III and IV.Sliding hiatal hernias (type 1) are the
most common (95%) and occur when the GEJ and the proximal stomach move
above diaphragm. Sliding hiatal hernias (Fig. 1, top middle) are not considered
paraesophageal hernias, and are typically repaired in setting of refractory GERD
(addressed in a separate chapter). Type II paraesophageal hernias occur when the
gastric fundus moves into the chest alongside a normally positioned GEJ (Fig.1, top
right). These are exceedingly rare. Type III paraesophageal hernias are characterized by the herniation of both GEJ and the fundus and body of the stomach to an
intra-thoracic position and account for the majority of the paraesophageal hiatal
hernias (Fig.1, bottom left) [8]. Most authors would call a sliding hiatal hernia a
Type III paraesophageal hernia when at least 50% of the stomach is herniated into
the chest. Finally, Type IV paraesophageal hernias are dened as the herniation of
other viscera such as colon, small bowel, or others alongside a Type III paraesophageal hernia (Fig.1, bottom right).

Type III Type IV
Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
GEJ
Normal Type I Type II
Fig. 1 Normal GE junction appearance (top left) and subtypes I-IV of hiatal and paraesophgeal
hernias. (Artwork by Clinton T.Morgan, MD)
165
3 Preoperative Preparation
An upper GI contrast study is helpful to both establish a diagnosis of a paraesophageal hernia and to evaluate gross esophageal motility and length as well as the location and extent of the supradiaphragmatic stomach. Figure2 shows an upper GI
study of a patient with a large type 3 hiatal hernia with organoaxial volvulus. This
study can evaluate for volvulus and obstruction and give an assessment of the type
of the hernia. Endoscopy should always be performed to measure esophageal length,
amount of herniated stomach, amount of volvulus, and mucosal abnormalities
including Cameron ulcers, Barrett’s esophagus, or neoplasms [11]. Patients with
paraesophageal hernias are often older and may have symptoms warranting cardiopulmonary evaluation prior to surgery. Esophageal manometry can be helpful to
rule out esophageal motility disorders but is also often difcult to obtain in settings
of large hernia and volvulus. Pressurization of the stomach against the distal esophagus within the chest may also create a falsely elevated integrated relaxation pressure and cause a patient to be misdiagnosed with EGJ outow obstruction. Cross
sectional imaging in the form of computed tomography can also be helpful to identify anatomy but is not required preoperatively (Fig.3).

166
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2 Barium
esophagram showing large
type III para-esophageal
hiatal hernia with
organoaxial volvulus of the
intrathoracic stomach
A. L. Shada
Fig. 3 Computed tomography of the chest showing a paraesophageal hernia. A large portion of the
stomach (green outline), is noted high in the mediastinum, at the level of the heart H note the proximity of the posterior aspect of the hernia to the aorta (red outline). On coronal view, the duodenum
is seen adjacent to the hiatus (blue outline)
4 Operative Approach
Paraesophageal hernias can be repaired using an abdominal or thoracic approach.
They can be repaired via open incision or minimally invasively, with or without
robotic assistance. Minimally invasive laparoscopic approach is currently preferred
in most centers. The possible benets of the trans-thoracic approach include direct
visualization of the sac and hernia, complete mobilization of the esophagus to the
aortic arch and the ease of a relaxing incision on the left hemidiaphragm [6, 11].
Disadvantages include the pain of a thoracotomy, higher risk of peri-operative complications and the extended length of hospital stay [6, 11]. Most centers in the
U.S. favor the use of laparoscopic techniques as complication rates seem lower than

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
167
open approaches and recurrence rates with laparoscopic techniques seem similar to
the ones obtained with the trans-thoracic and open abdominal approach [12, 13].
The laparoscopic approach to repair of paraesophageal hernias was rst described
in 1992 and emphasized crural approximation and fundoplication [14]. Five steps
are essential components of a laparoscopic repair of a paraesophageal hernia:
1. reduction of the hernia contents
2. excision of the hernia sac,
3. complete esophageal mobilization,
4. crural repair, and
5. antireux operation
One of the most important aspects of successful paraesophageal hernia repair is to
create a tension-free repair. Axial tension can be addressed with mediastinal esophageal mobilization in most cases. Occasionally, a Collis gastroplasty may be necessary. Lateral tension, due to a large diaphragmatic defect, is usually addressed by
using appropriate technique for crural closure or an absorbable synthetic or biologic
mesh. However, in selected cases relaxing incisions with or without absorbable
mesh placement may be benecial [11, 13, 15]. Only absorbable synthetic or biologic mesh should be used at the hiatus. Non-absorbable meshes should be avoided
as they have potential to erode into the esophagus. However, even the use of absorbable synthetic or biologic mesh is controversial since its efcacy in long-term objective recurrence has not been demonstrated [13]. Reduction of early recurrences with
biologic mesh placement, however, may be one advantage over primary repair [16].
Laparoscopic repair is associated with less blood loss, fewer intraoperative complications, faster diet advancement, and shorter hospital stays [6, 17]. Unfortunately,
the radiographic recurrence rate is still quite high, ranging from 23% to 50% in
selected series [15, 17–20]. However most radiographic recurrence are small recurrences of a small portion of the proximal stomach and the vast majority are asymptomatic, thus of little clinical signicance and needing no treatment [18, 20].
Laparoscopic port sites are positioned in a conguration similar to that of a standard Nissen fundoplication. An additional 5mm port in the left lower quadrant may
be benecial to assist with retraction and dissection. After inspection of the abdominal contents, the left lobe of the liver is retracted cephalad with a self-retaining laparoscopic retractor, exposing the hiatal defect and hernia (Fig.4).
Fig. 4 Laparoscopic view
of hiatus with giant hiatal
hernia. RC right crus, LC
left crus, S stomach, P
pylorus

168
https://t.me/med1917
A. L. Shada
5 Description oftheLaparoscopic Procedure
5.1 Positioning andAnesthesia
All patients should undergo induction of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation using techniques to prevent aspiration. The patient should be placed in either
the supine position or on a split-leg table. The arms are secured on padded arm
boards at a 90° angle to the body’s axis. A footboard is placed and the patient
secured to the bed in anticipation of a steep reverse Trendelenburg position during
the case. An orogastric or nasogastric tube can be placed as needed to decompress
the stomach. Sequential compression devices should be placed on the lower legs
bilaterally and subcutaneous heparin can be administered for deep vein thrombosis
prophylaxis. A foley catheter can be considered for close monitoring of urine output
if the procedure is emergent or the patient has multiple comorbidities. The skin of
the abdomen should be widely prepped after hair has been clipped short using an
atraumatic electric clipper. A single dose of antibiotics should be administered
within 1h of incision [21].
5.2 Access andTrocar Placement
Local anesthetic can be used prior to making incisions. Insufation via Veres needle
at the left subcostal midaxillary point, followed by placement of a dilating trocar,
can be used to obtain access. A laparoscope is inserted and the abdomen surveyed.
The remaining trocars can be placed under direct visualization. In total four ports
are placed: one 10/12mm port for introduction of sutures and mesh as needed and
three 5mm ports. A liver retractor can be used to elevate the left lobe of the liver to
expose the hiatus. Alternative liver retraction techniques include use of a suture
hammock between anterior hiatus and the falciform ligament to suspend the left
lobe [22].
6 Reduction ofHernia Contents andEsophageal
Hiatus Dissection
We typically avoid reducing the stomach by direct traction. The herniated stomach
can be easily injured due to underlying edema from acute/chronic incarceration or
inammation. If the hiatus is completely obscured by omentum, this can be grasped
and reduced to visualize the anterior hiatus. Dissection begins at the hiatal apex,
where the hernia sac can be easily grasped and the mediastinum entered right at the
junction of hernia sac and diaphragm muscle edge (Fig.5). This allows entry into
the mediastinal space. Time and care to identify the precise plane between hernia

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Anterior starting position of PEH repair, dividing sac and peritoneum of diaphragm
Fig. 6 View of dissection along left crus (LC), with hernia sac (HS) retracted toward screen left.
S stomach, SG short gastric vessels
169
sac and mediastinum will pay off here. This avascular plane can be dissected circumferentially along the crura. Consistent retraction of the hernia sac toward the
patients feet as dissection progresses will allow preservation of the peritoneum of
the crura, and keep your dissection plane inverted into the abdomen for easy visualization. It will also prevent encroaching up on the crural muscle itself during repair,
which allows for a more robust repair that includes intact peritoneum overlying the
crura. This plane is avascular and thus bleeding is typically minimal. Bleeding during this dissection would indicate that either you are too deep within the mediastinum or encroaching on the esophageal wall. In either case, care should be taken to
reidentify the proper plane before progressing. In general, the left crural pillar is
typically easier to dissect than the right (Fig.6). The right pillar has adjacent vasculature of the stomach (left gastric artery) which must be avoided during dissection
to avoid compromising the gastric blood supply.
Often once a portion of the phrenoesophageal ligament has been divided, insufation will enter the mediastinum and allow passive reduction of herniated contents
to fall into the abdomen without any need to place traction upon the stomach. Once
it is clear that this has allowed the left gastric pedicle to come intraabdominally, the
right crural pillar and pars accida can be divided and the right crural pillar can be
followed down to the decussation of the left and right crura (Fig.7). Within the
gastrohepatic ligament, there is sometimes a replaced left hepatic artery arising
from the left gastric artery. This can be divided after assuring that it is not the sole

170
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 7 View of dissection along right crus (RC) and to the posterior crural decussation. LC left
crus, IVC inferior vena cava
A. L. Shada
blood supply to the left lobe, but in the case of large PEH can sometimes be
left intact.
The hernia sac, which is the thinned out phrenoesophageal ligament, inserts onto
the distal esophagus about 2cm above the GE junction (Fig.7). Thus, reduction of
the hernia sac into the abdomen usually brings the stomach and GEJ into the abdomen satisfactorily. One of the tenets of this operation is reduction of at least 2.5cm
of esophagus into the abdomen. This can be accomplished with a high mediastinal
dissection. Blunt dissection and judicious electrosurgical dissection are reasonable
options here. Often the anterior esophagus has only avascular attachments to the
anterior mediastinum, and posteriorly the mesentery of the esophagus contains
esophageal perforating vessels from the aorta. The inferior pulmonary vein can be
identied during a full mediastinal dissection, and often the carina can be visualized
as well. The anterior and posterior vagus should be identied early and left intact
during dissection. The aorta and inferior vena cava should be identied early and
avoided during dissection of the mediastinum. The left and right pleura can also be
seen during mediastinal dissection.
Mobilization of the short gastrics is necessary, particularly if a fundoplication
will be performed as part of this procedure. This can begin at the watershed area just
above the last arcade of the gastroepiploic artery, which his often at the level of the
lower pole of the spleen (as measured with the stomach reduced into the abdomen
after reduction as above). I would caution an operative approach that starts the dissection of the hiatus with division of the short gastrics, as they are often very elongated and when the entire stomach is intrathoracic there is a risk of devascularizing
the entire greater curve of the stomach and perhaps putting the patient at higher risk
of postop intragastric volvulus [23].
Complete division of the hernia sac from the crural pillars is an essential component of this operation. This can be accomplished by alternating between the left and
right sides of the mediastinum until the crural edges are free of the sac circumferentially. Putting a Penrose drain or similar structure around the esophagus can facilitate this dissection by allowing retraction. Once the stomach is reduced and the
hernia sac has been circumferentially dissected free from the crura, a portion of the

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 8 The hernia sac
(HS) inserts on the distal
esophagus about 2cm
above the GE junction
(Green arrow). HS hernia
sac, S stomach
171
hernia sac can be removed from the esophagus. This should be routinely performed
and helps identify GE junction and also exposes the angle of His for construction of
a proper antireux operation. Identication of the vagus nerves prior to removal of
the hernia sac can avoid injury to these structures. This will necessitate leaving
some of the hernia sac on the lesser curvature side of the stomach to avoid encroaching on the anterior vagus, left gastric artery, and even the posterior vagus.
Intraoperative endoscopy can be very helpful to identify the esophagogastric
junction and ensure there is adequate intraabdominal esophageal length.
Intraabdominal esophageal length measurements can vary depending upon where
you measure them from (anterior crus versus left midcrural pillar, for example).
Adequate intraabdominal length is typically considered 2–3cm from the left crural
pillar to the esophagogastric junction.
In a minority of cases, even a high mediastinal dissection will not allow adequate
intraabdominal length. In these cases a lengthening gastroplasty can be performed
with a stapler (Fig.8) [6, 24, 25].
7 Crural Repair
Once the hernia sac has been excised, we turn our attention to repair of the hiatal
defect. The right crus and left crus are approximated with sutures (Fig.9). We typically use nonabsorbable sutures. Plegets can reinforce closure, and are particularly
helpful if the peritoneum overlying the crura has been violated during dissection or
if the quality of the crural muscle itself is poor. It is our preference to use bioabsorbable mesh plegets, but felt plegets have also been described. A simple interrupted
suture pattern, horizontal suture pattern, or running suture pattern can be used. The
number of sutures needed will vary dependent upon defect size. The crural pillars
should be closed to the point that they about the esophageal wall when it is allowed
to lie tension free within the hiatus (ie: not being retracted with an instrument or

172
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 9 Collis gastroplasty
of the proximal stomach,
with end target of true GE
junction (green arrow)
Fig. 10 Posterior hiatal
closure. LC left crus, RC
right crus, IVC inferior
vena cava
A. L. Shada
penrose drain) (Fig.10). Closing the hiatus too tightly can risk postoperative dysphagia. Leaving more than a 5mm gap between esophageal wall and crural muscle
can risk a recurrent hernia.
If there is excess lateral tension upon the crura during closure, maneuvers including reduction of CO2 insufation, creation of bilateral capnothoraces, or performance of relaxing incisions can help bring the crura together without tension.
8 Absorbable Synthetic andBiological Mesh Placement
Mesh reinforcement of the crural closure has been used in an attempt to reduce the
relatively high recurrence rates observed after paraesophageal hernia repair [16].
Synthetic mesh has the lowest hernia recurrence rate in randomized studies but erosion of permanent mesh into the esophagus is a feared complication and thus synthetic mesh should not be used to reinforce diaphragmatic closure[26]. Biologic
meshes have a better safety prole and have been shown to improve recurrence rates
in the short term but not the long term [16, 27]. Biosynthetic mesh has been used
with some success and is a bit less expensive than biologic mesh [28–30]. Mesh is
typically used as an onlay, and afxed with sutures or glue.

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair
https://t.me/med1917
The largest randomized controlled trials comparing the use of absorbable mesh
to no mesh with both 6month and 2year results suggest that the objective success
rate seems to be improved with mesh over non-mesh repair in the short term [16,
27]. However, appropriate long-term follow-up is lacking and objective recurrence
tends to increase over time [27, 31]. Another randomized controlled trial found no
difference at any timepoint between suture repair and absorbable mesh repair[32,
33]. Notably, the complications from non-absorbable mesh usage can be severe,
including esophageal erosion (0.2%) and extensive hiatal brosis (0.5%) [6, 34].
For these reasons, absorbable mesh is advised [16, 31].
Despite the lack of level I evidence that the use of mesh reduces recurrence rates,
newer biological and absorbable synthetic products that are less expensive are commonly used in practice. The location of recurrence can vary depending on the size
of the defect, the timing of the recurrence, and the health of the diaphragmatic tissue. We place a U-shaped absorbable mesh around the esophagus at the level of the
hiatus. The mesh onlay is placed posteriorly, with the esophagus cupped by the U
and the approximated posterior hiatus covered. The mesh may be secured in place
with brin glue or sutures.
173
9 Antireux Operation
A gastric fundoplication around the distal esophagus is recommended after the closure of the hiatal defect to prevent de-novo or recurrent GERD symptoms after
surgery. Some patients have a hypotonic LES and will benet from fundoplication
to augment LES tone. All patients have complete disruption of their phrenoesophageal ligament by virtue of their hernia as well as the extensive dissection required to
repair the diaphragm. Some types of fundoplication also assist in securing the gastric fundus to the esophagus and diaphragm as a gastropexy to discourage reherniation. The choice of a posterior complete (360° Nissen), posterior partial (270°
Toupet), or anterior partial (180° Dor or Watson) fundoplication is based on individual patient characteristics and surgeon preferences. Some characteristics that
surgeons take into account when deciding on antireux operation of choice include
patient characteristics, patient symptoms of reux or dysphagia, esophageal function on preoperative testing, size of fundus, and surgeon preference and comfort
with a given antireux operation.
We favor a partial fundoplication as most of these patients have reux as a presenting symptom, and many have inherent esophageal motility dysfunction related
to advanced age or the chronic nature of the partial obstruction caused by the paraesophageal herniation. A completed posterior 270° fundoplication is shown in
Fig.11. The technical steps for the creation of the Nissen, Toupet and Dor fundoplications can be found in the “Laparoscopic Antireux Surgery” chapter of this book.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
