Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_832_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
144
https://t.me/med1917
laparoscopic approach, the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs with the assis­tant on the patient’s left side. If using robotic-assistance, after the robot is docked, the assistant can sit between the patient’s legs while the surgeon is at the robotic console.
M. Grasty and V. Gershuni
5 Technical Steps forMinimally Invasive
Anti-Reux Procedure
5.1 Placement ofTrocars
Five trocars are used for the operation. The initial trocar is placed about 15cm below the xiphoid process about 1–2cm to the left of the midline; this port is used for the laparoscope. The method for rst trocar insertion will vary depending on patient’s specic characteristics and surgeon’s preference; this can include the Hasson technique, Veress needle, or direct trocar insertion with or without pneumo­peritoneum. The second port (5mm) is placed at the same level as the initial entry port between the left midclavicular and the left anterior axillary line; this is the assistant’s port utilized for retraction via Babcock or Penrose drain. The third port (5mm) is placed at the same level as the previous two ports but in the right midcla­vicular line or the sub-xiphoid location. It is used for insertion of the diamond liver retractor, the purpose of which is to lift the lateral segment of the left lobe of the liver and expose the esophagogastric junction. The last two trocars (5mm on the right of the patients and 11mm on the left) are placed as high as possible under the costal margin and about 5–6cm to the right and the left of the midline; these are the surgeon’s working ports. For the robotic approach, multiple port placement options are possible, including using the right lateral port as a dynamic liver retractor in place of a stationary laparoscopic retractor. This has advantages for high mediasti­nal dissection. In addition to the four 8mm robotic ports, a peri-umbilical laparo­scopic 11 mm assistant port is placed. After port placement, pneumoperitoneum should be dropped to 12mmHg, so long as the working space is not compromised. A smoke evacuator can also help with maintaining visualization throughout the case.
6 Essential Technical Elements ofMinimally Invasive
Anti- Reux Surgery (ARS)
There are ve key technical steps of ARS:
1. Complete phrenoesophageal ligament/crural dissection with identication and
preservation of both anterior and posterior vagus nerve and reduction/excision of hiatal hernia sac if present,
Minimally Invasive Anti-Reux Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
145
2. Circumferential dissection of the esophagus and posterior mediastinum to obtain
adequate abdominal esophageal length (at least 3cm),
3. Crural closure,
4. Mobilization of gastric fundus with division of short gastric vessels, and
5. Fundoplication—partial or complete.
The principals of the operation remain the same, whether a laparoscopic or robotic approach is utilized. However, like any new technical approach, there is a learning curve and considerations that should be made to optimize the technique for best patient outcomes.
7 Dissection oftheEsophageal Hiatus
andEsophageal Mobilization
The procedure begins with division of the gastrohepatic ligament above the caudate lobe of the liver, where this ligament usually is very thin, and continues toward the diaphragm until the right crus is identied (Fig.1). In 15% of patients an accessory or replaced left hepatic artery, branching off the left gastric artery, may run in the gastrohepatic ligament altogether with the always present hepatic branch of the vagus nerve. This should be preserved, but if exposure is compromised and the ves­sel has a small size (indicative that it may be an accessory not a replaced left hepatic artery) it can generally be divided without consequence. The peritoneum and the phrenoesophageal membrane above the esophagus are divided (Fig.2) and the ante- rior vagus nerve is identied (Fig.3). The Phrenoesophageal fad pad maybe excised and left crus of the diaphragm is exposed (Fig.4).
The right crus is then separated from the right side of the esophagus by sharp and blunt dissection (Fig.5), and the posterior vagus nerve is identied. The right crus
Fig. 1 Division of the gastrohepatic ligament (A left lobe of the liver,
B gastrohepatic ligament, C diaphragm)
146
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2 Opening of the phrenoesophageal membrane and initial dissection into the posterior mediastinum (A caudate lobe of the liver, B right crus, C areolar tissue of posterior mediastinum, D divided phrenoesophageal ligament and fat pad E left crus, F gastric fundus)
Fig. 3 The anterior vagus nerve (Arrow) is identied (A caudate lobe of liver,
B right crus, C left crus, D esophagus)
M. Grasty and V. Gershuni
Fig. 4 Exposure of the left crus and dissection of the angle of his (A right crus, B posterior mediastinum, C left crus, D gastroesophageal junction (excised phrenoesophageal fat pad), E stomach)
Minimally Invasive Anti-Reux Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Dividing the peritoneum in between the right crus and esophagus (A right crus, B esophagus, C left crus, D stomach)
Fig. 6 Dissecting the right crus inferiorly towards the junction with the left crus (A caudate lobe of liver, B inferior vena cava, C right crus, D esophagus, E left crus)
147
is dissected inferiorly toward the junction with the left crus (Fig.6). Care should be taken to leave the peritoneal lining on the right crus in preparation for crural closure.
It is at the beginning of the dissection that care must be taken to identify and excise any potentially present hiatal hernia sac. If present, the sac needs to be reduced in the abdominal cavity and excised in its entirety.
The dissection is continued cranially into the posterior mediastinum to ensure proper mobilization of the distal esophagus, which will then translate into adequate abdominal esophageal length. This posterior dissection is essential to prevent axial tension on the GEJ and decrease risk of recurrence. To avoid the risk of injuring the inferior vena cava or the left gastric artery at the beginning of the dissection, some surgeons use a different method—the so-called left crus approach. In this approach, the operation begins with identication of the left crus of the diaphragm and divi­sion of the peritoneum and the phrenoesophageal membrane overlying it. The next step is division of the short gastric vessels, starting midway along the greater
148
https://t.me/med1917
M. Grasty and V. Gershuni
curvature of the stomach and continuing upward to join the area of the previous dis­section. When the fundus has been thoroughly mobilized, the peritoneum is divided from the left to the right crus, and the right crus is dissected downward to expose the junction of the right and left crura. With this technique, the vena cava is never at risk. In addition, the branches of the anterior vagus nerve and the left gastric artery are less exposed to danger. This technique can be very useful, particularly for man­agement of very large paraesophageal hernias and for re-operative anti-reux operations.
8 Mobilization ofGreater Curvature withDivision ofShort
Gastric Vessels
Dissection and division of the short gastric vessels begins at the level of the superior portion of the gastric body (Fig.7) and continues upward until the most proximal short gastric vessel is divided (Figs.8 and 9). Importantly, all the attachments of the posterior aspect of the gastric fundus to the left crura and the pancreas should also be divided (Fig.10).
Care must be taken to avoid bleeding, either from the short gastric vessels or from the spleen, and damage to the gastric wall. Use of an electrosurgical device with both sealing and cutting properties is often sufcient; however, if there is con­cern, placement of endoscopic clips in the more proximal short gastric vessels may also be used to prevent bleeding.
Fig. 7 Mobilization of greater curvature with division of SGV (A greater curvature of the stomach, B SGV, C spleen)
Minimally Invasive Anti-Reux Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 8 Mobilization of greater curvature with division of SGV (A greater curvature of the stomach, B SGV, C spleen)
Fig. 9 Mobilization of greater curvature with division of SGV (A greater curvature of the stomach, B SGV, C spleen)
149
Fig. 10 Final aspect of complete mobilization of greater curvature with division of SGV (A liver,
B left crus, C pancreas, D greater curvature of the
stomach)
150
https://t.me/med1917
M. Grasty and V. Gershuni
9 Creation ofaRetroesophageal Window
The esophagus is retracted upward with a Babcock clamp applied at the level of the esophagogastric junction. By blunt and sharp dissection, a window is created under the esophagus between the gastric fundus and esophagus, and the left pillar of the crus. The window is enlarged and a Penrose drain is passed around the esophagus. This drain is then used for traction (Fig.11). Alternatively, for the robotic approach, a laparoscopic instrument (i.e. atraumatic bowel grasper or suction irrigator) can be inserted via an assist port and used for anterior and upward retraction within the retroesophageal space (Fig.12).
During this part of the procedure the surgeon should be aware of potential com­mon complications such inadvertent pleurotomy and creation of a capnothorax. Entering the pleural cavity usually occurs during high mediastinal dissection or
Fig. 11 Final aspect of the creation of the retroesophageal window (A right crus, B left crus, C esophagus, D penrose drain around the GE junction)
Fig. 12 Robotic view after completion of hiatal dissection and creation of retroesophageal window (A right crus, B esophagus.
Note: lap grasper through retroesophageal window for retraction of GE junction)
Minimally Invasive Anti-Reux Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
151
during redo hernia repairs when there is scarring. This problem can be avoided by properly identifying the pleura and separating it by using blunt dissection.
If the pleural space is entered, the surgeon should immediately notify the anes­thesiologist. The anesthesiologist may observe that peak airway pressure has increased; it is usually managed by adjusting ventilation mode and reducing the pneumoperitoneum pressure down to 8 or 10mmHg. If needed, enlarging the hole in the pleura can minimize any potential for tension physiology by equilibrating the compartments. At the end of the procedure, while deating the CO2 pneumoperito­neum, the surgeon should ask the anesthesiologist to provide the patient a few large volume breaths. Residual CO2 in the pleural space is absorbed within 1 to 2h and chest drainage is not necessary in most cases. Capnothoraces tend to resolve spon­taneously, rendering insertion of a chest tube unnecessary. Neck and face emphy­sema related to progression of the pneumomediastinum into the subcutaneous tissue resolves without intervention within a few hours of the end of the procedure. Unless there is a clinical indication, chest radiographs are not particularly helpful immedi­ately post-operatively and can lead to unnecessary intervention.
10 Crural Closure
The diaphragmatic crura are closed with interrupted 0 non-absorbable braided sutures. For laparoscopic repair, either an Endostitch device (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT) or free-needle approach can be utilized to close the crura. Depending on prefer­ence, the sutures can be tied intracorporeally or extracorporeally. The Endostitch device, when used properly, allows for large crura bites while protecting the needle from inadvertently damaging the aorta or IVC (Figs.13 and 14). Exposure is pro­vided by retracting the esophagus upward and toward the patient’s left with the Penrose drain. The rst stitch should be placed just above the junction of the two
Fig. 13 Closure of the diaphragmatic crura (A right crus, B esophagus,
C aorta, D left crus, E suture device)
152
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 14 Closure of the diaphragmatic crura (A caudate lobe of the liver, B IVC, C right crus, D aorta, E left crus, F suture device)
Fig. 15 Crural closure— nal aspect (A liver, B right crus, C esophagus, D penrose drain, E left crus)
M. Grasty and V. Gershuni
pillars. We prefer a gure of eight stich conguration. Additional stitches are placed 1cm apart, and a space of about 1cm is left between the uppermost stitch and the esophagus (Fig.15). For a robotic approach, the crura can be closed and the suture can be tied using two needle drivers (Figs.16 and 17). A slipknot is helpful for plac- ing the knots when under tension. Occasionally, an anterior crural stitch may be helpful to re-establish the crural relationship around the esophagus and minimize risk of anterior hiatal hernia recurrence.
The bougie is not placed inside the esophagus during this part of the procedure. If a Nissen 360° fundoplication is planned, a 56 French bougie should be inserted by the anesthesiologist and passed through the esophagogastric junction under lapa­roscopic vision. Routine Bougie insertion is not necessary when a partial fundopli­cation is planned. The crura must be snug around the esophagus but not overly tight: a closed grasper should slide easily between the esophagus and the crura.
Minimally Invasive Anti-Reux Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 16 Robotic closure of the diaphragmatic crura (A caudate lobe of the liver, B esophagus, C right crus, D aorta, E left crus)
Fig. 17 Robotic crural closure
153
11 Fundoplication
The choice of a posterior complete (360° Nissen) versus posterior partial (270° Toupet) or anterior partial (180° Dor) fundoplication is based on individual patient characteristics and surgeon preferences. While laparoscopic Nissen predominated for many years, more surgeons are preferentially performing a partial Toupet fundo­plication. In numerous studies, there has been equivalent heartburn relief when comparing between complete and partial posterior fundoplication [29]. Many cen­ters in Europe and North America favor the 270° posterior or 180° anterior partial fundoplication, as recent randomized controlled trials have shown their association with lower rates of re-intervention and post-operative side effect such as gas bloat or dysphagia [1618]. Of note, however, anterior partial fundoplication has been associated with increased use of antisecretory medications and higher prevalence of heartburn at long-term follow-up [30].