Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_824_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
Diculty Swallowing After Open Heart Surgery
79

References

1. Monish R, Maheshawari A, Joshi R, etal. Vocal cord paralysis after cardiac surgery and inter-
ventions: a review of possible etiologies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(6):1661–7.
2. Clement M, Zhu W, Neshkova E, Bouin M.Jackhammer esophagus: from manometric diagno-
sis to clinical presentation. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:1–7.
3. Tolone S, Savarino E, Docimo L. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial brillation
elicited "jackhammer esophagus": a new complication due to vagal nerve stimulation? J
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(4):612–5. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm15034.
4. García-Lledó J, Clemente-Sánchez A, Merino-Rodríguez B, etal. Hypercontractile “jackham-
mer esophagus”. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015;107:234.
5. Schlottmann F, Patti M.Primary esophageal motility disorders: beyond achalasia. Int J Mol
Sci. 2017;18(7):1399.
6. Jia Y, Arenas J, Hejazi RA, Elhana S, Saadi M, McCallum RW.Frequency of jackhammer
esophagus as the extreme phenotypes of esophageal hypercontractility based on the new
Chicago classication. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50(8):615–8.
7. Marjoux S, Brochard C, Roman S, et al. Botulinum toxin injection for hypercontractile or
spastic esophageal motility disorders: may high-resolution manometry help to select cases? Dis
Esophagus. 2015;28(8):735–41.
8. Estremera-Arévalo F, Albéniz E, Rullán M, Areste I, Iglesias R, Vila J.Efcacy of peroral
endoscopic myotomy compared with other invasive treatment options for the different esopha-
geal motor disorders. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017;109(8):578–86.
Unexpected Dysphagia andHeartburn After Neck Radiotherapy
SubhanAhmad

1 Case Presentation

A 61-year-old female with a history of anal canal squamous cell carcinoma status post-chemoradiation, and progressive metastatic disease involving the cervical, supraclavicular, and mediastinal lymph nodes, pulmonary nodules, and tracheal mass requiring radiation therapy for neck adenopathy presented to the gastroen­terology clinic for evaluation of dysphagia. She described food sticking at the level of the lower neck without associated weight loss, heartburn, odynophagia, or chest pain. A modied barium swallow study showed delayed passage of the bar­ium cookie at the level of the vallecula. A barium esophagram showed a hiatal hernia and a large amount of induced gastroesophageal reux. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) showed a 2cm sliding hiatal hernia, lax lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and circumferential erosive esophagitis in the proximal 3cm of the esophagus consistent with radiation esophagitis (Fig.1). The dysphagia was thought to be multifactorial and likely an oropharyngeal dyspha­gia, suspected gastroesphageal reux disease (GERD), and radiation esophagitis in the proximal esophagus. She was instructed to take omeprazole 40mg every morning and follow dysphagia precautions.
The patient returned to the clinic nearly twoyears later for evaluation of heart­burn and ongoing dysphagia to solids and liquids. She endorsed symptoms of daily heartburn despite taking 40mg of omeprazole twice daily and ranitidine 150mg at bedtime. She described the dysphagia as a sensation of food getting stuck in her chest one to two times per week, usually when eating meat. She also reported coughing, choking, and occasional nausea with emesis, for which she occasionally
S. Ahmad (*) Division of Hospital Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: sahmad1@metrohealth.org
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Fass et al. (eds.), Esophageal Disorders,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56441-3_21
81
82
Fig. 1 Upper endoscopy showing normal z-line (left) but circumferential erosive esophagitis in the proximal 3cm of the esophagus (right)
Fig. 2 Upper endoscopy showing whitish esophageal plaques and no luminal narrowing
S. Ahmad
takes xyloxadryl oral solution but did not have odynophagia. Repeat EGD showed a 4cm hiatal hernia, whitish esophageal plaques, and decreased esophageal peristal­tic activity without any luminal narrowing (Fig.2). Biopsies did not show evidence of eosinophilic esophagitis but did identify candida esophagitis, which was treated with uconazole. As symptoms persisted, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was performed and showed normal median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), borderline LES resting pressure, 50% weak swallows, and 50% failed swal­lows (Fig.3). She was diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and management of GERD was optimized with high-dose PPI and lifestyle changes as well as dysphagia precautions. She did well and regained her lost weight.
Unexpected Dysphagia andHeartburn After Neck Radiotherapy
Fig. 3 High-resolution esophageal manometry showing a representative weak swallow. Tabular numbers pertain to this particular swallow
83

2 Discussion

Our patient had several potential etiologies of dysphagia. As suggested by the modi­ed barium swallow, oropharyngeal defecits were present. Radiation esophagitis in the upper esophagus may have contributed as well. However, the clear symptom of esophageal dysphagia with the patient experiencing food sticking at the level of the chest suggested a problem in the more distal esophagus was the cause of the patient’s symptoms. An investigation including upper endoscopy and HREM determined that the likely etiology of the patient’s dysphagia was ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). IEM is an abnormality in peristaltic amplitude, contraction vigor, and/or peristaltic integrity with normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation [1]. According to the Chicago Classication v4.0, at least 50% of swallows must be fol­lowed by failed contractions or more than 70% of swallows followed by ineffective contractions to meet diagnostic criteria [2].
IEM, the most common disorder identied on HREM, is found in 15–30% of patients undergoing the procedure, though the prevalence has lowered under the more stringent diagnostic criteria of Chicago Classication v4.0 [2]. Patients with IEM typically present with reux-like symptoms or dysphagia. IEM is commonly discovered in patients with GERD, although which came rst remains unknown [24]. Our patient had a large hiatal hernia and experienced heartburn that did not respond to standard dose PPI, making the link between GERD and IEM especially relevant to our patient. Had our patient experienced GERD symptoms that persisted
84
S. Ahmad
despite high dose PPI, reux testing to determine candidacy for more aggressive antireux therapy, including antireux surgery, would have been appropriate. Development of IEM after radiation therapy to the chest has not been previously described, and in our case it remains unknown whether radiation therapy triggered the development of IEM or the patient already had it.
The clinical signicance of IEM is primarily that it may affect GERD treatment, specically, patient’s candidacy for endoscopic or surgical treatment of GERD.If our patient had been diagnosed with refractory GERD, the diagnosis of IEM would support pursuing a partial fundoplication, rather than a complete one, if antireux surgery was to be pursued. However, IEM remains relevant on its own and can also be a cause of dysphagia even in the absence of GERD.Management of IEM is focused on optimizing treatment of GERD [5]. There is no effective treatment that can restore impaired smooth muscle contractility of the esophagus and thus improve symptoms [15].

References

1. Gyawali CP, Sifrim D, Carlson DA, etal. Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future
directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium. Neurogastroenterol Motil.
2019;31:e13584.
2. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, etal. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution
manometry: Chicago classication version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058.
3. Scheerens C, Tack J, Rommel N.Buspirone, a new drug for the management of patients with
ineffective esophageal motility? United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2015;3:261–5.
4. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, etal. The chicago classication of esophageal motility
disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–74.
5. Triadalopoulos G, Tandon A, Shetler KP, etal. Clinical and pH study characteristics in reux
patients with and without ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM). BMJ Open Gastroenterol.
2016;3:e000126.
Achalasia inaPoor Surgical Candidate
SubhanAhmad

1 Case Presentation

An 82-year-old Caucasian male with known achalasia, diagnosed approximately 7years ago, presented to the gastroenterology clinic with progressive worsening of dysphagia and regurgitation of solid and liquid foods several times a week. He endorsed a ten-pound weight loss in the past year and has had to sleep at an incline with bed wedges due to regurgitation of food at night. His past medical history is signicant for colon cancer with a partial colectomy, coronary artery disease requir­ing percutaneous coronary intervention, peripheral vascular disease with prior femoral- popliteal bypass, and a transient ischemic attack. The patient was not treated at the time of diagnosis of achalasia due to his age and comorbidities and thus was advised to follow a soft diet. A timed barium esophagram showed a bird beak appearance of the distal esophagus, with less than 10% change in esophageal contrast volume between zero and ve minutes as well as a large right epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum (Fig.1).
An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was completed which showed a large esophageal diverticulum, retained food in the esophagus and stomach, and resis­tance at the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) all consistent with the diagnosis of achalasia (Fig.2). Due to his age and poor surgical candidacy, one hundredunits of botulinum toxin were injected successfully, divided into four quadrants at the LES. Subsequent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) showed 100% failed swallows and an integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) within normal range, but the test was non-diagnostic as the catheter appeared to enter the diverticulum rather than cross the LES (Fig. 3). The patient had a positive symptom response but
S. Ahmad (*) Division of Hospital Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: sahmad1@metrohealth.org
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Fass et al. (eds.), Esophageal Disorders,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56441-3_22
85
86
Fig. 1 Barium esophagram showing a large right epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum
Fig. 2 EGD showing retained food in the esophagus
S. Ahmad
developed severe dysphagia again six months later. Repeat EGD with repeat Botulinum toxin injection into the LES was again performed. This time the patient had a near-complete response. Subsequent HREM showed a normalized IRP with scant peristaltic activity in the distal esophagus, consistent with successfully treated type 1 achalasia (Fig. 4).
Plans were made for further botulinum toxin injections as needed.
Achalasia inaPoor Surgical Candidate
Fig. 3 A representative swallow from high-resolution esophageal manometry showing no peri­stalsis but no denite pressure inversion, suggesting the catheter did not cross into the stomach. Tabular values pertain to this particular swallow
87
Fig. 4 A representative swallow from high-resolution esophageal manometry post-botulinum toxin injection therapy demonstrating a median IRP within the normal range, consistent with suc­cessfully treated type 1 achalasia, as well as development of peristaltic activity in the distal esopha­gus. Tabular values pertain to this particular swallow
88
S. Ahmad

2 Discussion

Although we have very denitive therapies for achalasia, such as pneumatic dila­tion, peroral endoscopic myotomy, and surgical myotomy, not all patients are can­didates for these therapies. Our patient temporarily responded to a less invasive treatment option. Noninvasive management with oral medications or local botuli­num toxin (BT) injection is considered in patients who are high-risk for a denitive interaction, like our patient [1, 2]. BT injection is the most effective, and commonly utilized, pharmacological therapy for achalasia. Injection into the LES inhibits the release of acetylcholine, causing smooth muscle relaxation and facilitating the pas­sage of the food bolus into the gastric body. This is an effective short-term therapy; however, duration of effectiveness and need for repeat injections is variable but typi­cally lasts between three and twelvemonths [2]. In some patients, the effect of BT injection may last longer. Our patient responded well in the short term, and BT injections can be repeated as needed.

References

1. Patel DA, Lappas BM, Vaezi MF.An overview of achalasia and its subtypes. Gastroenterol
Hepatol (N Y). 2017;13(7):411–21.
2. Pasricha PJ, Rai R, Ravich WJ, Hendrix TR, Kalloo AN.Botulinum toxin for achalasia: long-
term outcome and predictors of response. Gastroenterology. 1996;110(5):1410–5.

Two Disorders Wrapped into One

SubhanAhmad

1 Case Presentation

A 58-year-old African American female presented for evaluation of dysphagia while undergoing presurgical evaluation for a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Her past medical history was signicant for morbid obesity, well-controlled hyperten­sion, hyperlipidemia, compensated chronic nonischemic systolic heart failure (ejec­tion fraction 35%), obstructive sleep apnea, depression, osteoarthritis, and prediabetes. At the time of bariatric surgery evaluation, she complained of intermit­tent symptoms of esophageal dysphagia but had no symptoms of gastroesophageal reux disease (GERD).
An upper endoscopy was performed and was unremarkable. She underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), which showed an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) in both supine and upright positions, abnor­mally high lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, 60% normal swal­lows, and 40% hypercontractile swallows (Fig.1). The patient was diagnosed with esophagogastric junction outow obstruction (EGJOO) with hypercontractile esophagus. Given her symptoms were intermittent and relatively mild, no changes in her therapy were recommended, and she proceeded with bariatric surgery.
S. Ahmad (*) Division of Hospital Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: sahmad1@metrohealth.org
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Fass et al. (eds.), Esophageal Disorders,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56441-3_23
89