Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_190_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
40 Мб
Скачать
Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis 267
https://t.me/med1917
adenocarcinoma may develop after bilateral oophorectomy, even at sites far from the pelvis.[74] Unopposed estrogen stimulation may lead to premalignant or malignant transformation in the residual foci of endometriosis. Therefore, the addition of pro­gestins to estrogen replacement therapy should be considered in women who have undergone hysterectomy with oophorectomy because of endometriosis, especially if they are known to have residual endometriosis.
APPEARANCES OF ENDOMETRIOSIS
Laparoscopic assessment in combination with histologic exami­nation of the excised lesions remains the gold standard for diag­nosis of endometriosis. Knowledge of the most common loca­tions of endometriosis is required for accurate visual inspection of the pelvic and abdominal cavities. Three different forms of endometriosis must be considered during laparoscopic visualization: peritoneal implants, endometriomas, and deep infiltrating lesions of the rectovaginal septum. An increased awareness of the variations in the appearance of endometriotic lesions hasresulted in an almost twofoldincrease in the diagnosis of endometriosis at laparoscopy.[75] Peritonealimplantsaremost commonly localized in the uterosacral ligaments, cul-de-sac, ovarian fossa, and adjacent pelvic side walls. Less frequently, implants may also be found in the upper abdomen as well as on the surface of the bladder and the bowel (predominantly rec­tum, sigmoid colon, appendix, and cecum). Hence, careful and close inspection of the entire peritoneal cavity should be per­formed. Magnification obtained during laparoscopy depends on the distance between the laparoscope and the area inspected; for example, the magnification rateis approximately3.2and 1.7 from a distance of 10 and 20 mm, respectively. Magnification allows the recognition of lesions as small as 400 μm for red and 180 μm for clear lesions.
Complete removal of endometriotic implants is difficult because of their variability in appearance and visibility. Powder burn lesions represent foci of inactive disease containing stroma and glands embedded in hemosiderindeposits.[76] These lesions are more common in older women and may not cause pain or infertility.[77] When implants involve the uterosacral ligaments, they are palpable as tender nodularities and can cause dysmenor­rhea and dyspareunia. Atypical andnonpigmented lesions, which are seen as clear vesicles, pink vascular patterns, white scarred lesions, red lesions, yellow-brown patches, and peritoneal win­dows, represent active endometriosis and secrete prostaglandin in the peritoneal fluid.[78] The peritoneum must be examined from different angles and at different degrees of illumination to see vesicles or whitish lesions and the peritoneal folds must be stretched and searched for small, atypical lesions.
Deep nodular endometriosis is usually localized in the rec­tovaginal and uterovesical septum, in other fibromuscular pelvic structures (e.g., uterosacral ligaments), and in the muscular wall of pelvic structures. Rectovaginal nodules are histologically sim­ilar to an adenomyoma, being composed of smooth muscle, endometrial glands, and stroma. They probably constitute an entity distinct from peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis and are thought to originate from the mullerian rests present in
the rectovaginal septum.[79] Deep endometriotic lesions may be predominantly retroperitoneal, with little or no superficial peritoneal involvement. The depth of endometriotic implants may be related to the level of disease activity and symptoms (Figure 10.3.1). Cornillie and coworkers [80] reported that cel­lular activity of endometriosis was greater for both superficial and deep implants (58% and 68%, respectively) than for inter­mediate implants (25%). They postulated that earlylesions result from proliferation of retrograde menstrual tissue and present as superficial implants. These lesions progress to an intermediate depth, where they either become inactive or progress and infil­trate deeper layers, usually more than 5 mm. Implants continue their biologic activity and proliferate, being stimulated by circu­lating steroid hormones because they are no longer dependent on the steroids in the peritoneal fluid.[78,81]
Microscopic endometriosis may be overlooked during surgi­cal exploration but is identified by light and electron microscopy in normal-appearing peritoneum. This finding has been noted in patients with visible endometriosis in other areas of the pelvis [52,53] and patients with unexplained infertility in whom no endometriosis was seen at laparoscopy.[54,82] Microscopic pre­sentation may preclude total resection, but two techniques can enhance visual detection. Near-contactlaparoscopymagnifiesthe peritoneal area. In a series of 20 women with pelvic endometrio­sis, biopsy specimens were taken from peritoneum that appeared normal. The histologic studies of this tissue revealed only one case of microscopic endometriosis, and an additional two cases were suspicious for endometriosis.[53] The second technique for improved detection of microscopic endometriosis is “paint­ing” the peritoneum and broad ligament with blood or serosan­guineous fluid to render atypical lesions more evident.[83] Retroperitoneal hydrodissection of the anterior cul-de-sac, pos­terior broad ligaments, and pelvic side wall sometimes facilitates the identification of lesions (Figure 10.3.2).
At the time of laparoscopy, endometriomas may be iden­tified as smooth-walled, dark-brownish cysts, usually strongly associated with the presence of adhesions. Upon incision, dense, brown, chocolate-like fluid is released. As reported by Vercellini et al.[84], careful visual inspection of the ovariesis usually highly reliable in identification of endometriomas, with 97% sensitiv­ity and 95% specificity. Normal-appearing ovaries may contain endometriosis under an apparently normal cortex. By inserting a needle deep in the stroma and aspirating the ovary, Candiani and coworkers [85] identified small endometriomas in 48% of otherwise normal-appearing or slightly enlarged ovaries. They suggested that preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation is use­ful to screen for small subcortical ovarian cysts, which should be explored surgically with needle aspiration. The diagnosis of endometriosis is missed in at least 7% of patients and under­staged inas many as 50%.[53] Acareful examination of the pelvis is essential to diagnose and stage endometriosis and to be aware of its various appearances, including its presence as microscopic implants on visually normal peritoneal surfaces or as small, deep endometriomas within slightly enlarged but otherwise normal ovaries.
Using patient-assisted laparoscopy, Demco [86] studied the relationship of lesions of endometriosis to pelvic pain. He found that pain from endometriosis has little relationship to the loca­tion or color of lesions. However, red and vascular lesions were
268 Bulent Berker, Thomas H. S. Hsu, Keith L. Lee, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, and Camran Nezhat
https://t.me/med1917
Symphysis
Pouch of Douglas
Pubic bone (cut)
Bladder
Ureter
Vagina
Rectum
Uterosacral ligament
Peritoneal defect
Superficial endometriosis
Peritoneal defect
Superficial endometriosis
(sagittal section)
A
Figure 10.3.1. (A) A peritoneal defect in the pouch of Douglas has an endometriotic implant at its base. The
inset reveals a healed peritoneal defect with infiltrating endometriosis beneath it.
Peritoneal defect is healed
Retraction of peritoneum and rectum toward the uterosacral ligament
Peritoneal defect is healed
Infiltrating endometriosis
B
Figure 10.3.1. (Continued )(B) Sagittal view of endometriotic implants involving the uterosacral ligament. The inset shows infiltrating endometriosis beneath the peritoneum.
Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis 269
https://t.me/med1917
The bowel is retracted over the uterosacral ligaments
Vagina
Rectum
Infiltrating endometriosis
Uterosacral ligament
A
Figure 10.3.2. (A) Anatomic representation of the pelvic structures involved with implants of endometriosis. (Continued )
the most painful, followed by clear and white scar lesions. Least painful were black lesions. Pain extended beyond lesions to normal-looking peritoneum for up to 27 mm but was not con­sistent with respect to the type of lesion.
TREATMENT OF ENDOMETRIOTIC IMPLANTS
Diagnostic Laparoscopy
Initially,the surgeon exploresthe pelvic cavity to assess the extent of disease and identify abnormalities or distortions of the pelvic organs. Photographs and video recordings have been very use­ful for documenting the surgeon’s findings. In a recent opin­ion statement, however, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Professional Liability advised against physicians recording proceduresbecause of a growing fear among clinicians that procedural tapes can be edited, enhanced, or otherwise manipulated for the purposes of winning liability suits against doctors.[87] Thecommittee further cautionedthatif a recording is made, the health care facility should keep the origi­nal tape and provide an exactcopy tothepatient.Thelocationand boundaries of the bladder, ureter, colon, rectum, pelvic gutters, uterosacral ligaments, and major blood vessels are noted. The upper abdominal organs, abdominal walls, liver, and diaphragm should be evaluated for endometriosis or any other condition that may contribute to the patient’s symptoms. The omentum and the small bowel are evaluated for disease and to ensure that they were not injuredduring insertionof the Veress needle or tro­car. A rectovaginal examination is accomplished to evaluate deep and retroperitoneal endometriosis found in the lower pelvis at the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligament, lower colon, and
pararectal area. Deep retroperitoneal endometriosis is rare with­out a connection to the surface peritoneum.
In 15% of patients with endometriosis, the appendix is involvedand should be examined.[88] An implant that has pene­trated retroperitoneally several centimeters is called an “iceberg” lesion. It can be detected laparoscopically by palpating areas of the pelvis and bowel with the suction–irrigator probe. With the forceps or probe, endometriotic implants are examined to gauge size, depth, and proximity to normal pelvic structures. The diag­nostic laparoscopy is extended to an operative procedure if the patient has been advised of this possibility.
Operative Laparoscopy
The operative procedure begins by lysing adhesions between the bowel and the pelvic organs to expose the pelvic cavity ade­quately. The ovaries are dissected from the cul-de-sac or pelvic side wall,and the tubes are freed fromadhesions and chromoper­tubated. Endometrial implants and endometriomas are resected or vaporized, and if thepatienthassignificantmidline pelvic pain, uterosacral nerve ablation or presacral nerve resection is done.
Lysis of Bowel Adhesions
Bowel adhesions vary in thickness, vascularity, and cohesive­ness. Some adhesions are stretched without tearing the tissue, excised with a laser harmonic scalpel or electrosurgery at the points of attachment to the pelvic organs, and removed. Dense adhesions are excised with scissors or any other cutting instru­ment. The CO
laser has more controlled penetration than do
2
electrosurgery and fiber lasers. The structures requiring separa­tion arepulled apart with forceps, and a cleavage planeis formed.
270 Bulent Berker, Thomas H. S. Hsu, Keith L. Lee, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, and Camran Nezhat
https://t.me/med1917
Superior rectal artery
Inferior rectal artery
B
Figure 10.3.2. (Continued )(B) The ureters are at risk because of infiltrating endometriosis.
Hydrodissection is useful to identify and develop the dissection plane, which is ablated or excised, using a laser or dissecting scis­sors or any other cutting instrument.
Peritoneal Implants
In treating peritoneal endometriosis, the implants should be destroyed in the most effective and least traumatic manner to minimize postoperative adhesions. Although different modalities have been used, hydrodissection and a high-power superpulse or ultrapulse CO
laser are the best choices for treatment.[89] This
2
laser doesnot penetrate water, anda fluid backstop (hydrodissec­tion) allows the surgeon to work on selected tissue with a greater safety margin than would otherwise be available (Figure 10.3.3). A small opening is made in the retroperitoneum with the laser or scissors, and lactated Ringer’s solution is injected beneath the lesion to provide a protective cushion of fluid between the lesion to be excised and the underlying ureter or blood vessels. The fluid under the implant absorbs the CO
laser energy, buffering
2
the underlying tissue. For retroperitoneal disease, the lesion is picked up with grasping forceps, pulled medially, and removed, using sharp or blunt dissection.
Bifurcation
Middle sacral artery
Middle rectal artery
Superficial peritoneal endometriosis is vaporized with the laser, coagulated with monopolar or bipolar current, or excised. Implants less than 2 mm are coagulated, vaporized, or excised. When lesions exceed 3 mm, vaporization or excision is nee­ded. For lesions greater than 5 mm, deep vaporization or exci­sional techniques are used. Superficial implants on the pelvic side wall are ablated with the CO
laser (3500 to 5500 W/cm2).
2
Low-power densities cause greater damage and more charring. High-power densities penetrate too deeply and injure underly­ing normal structures or cause unnecessary bleeding. Firing in a continuous mode will ablate the lesion from the surface to its base, where the peritoneal fat should appear as unpigmented and soft rather than fibrotic, like endometriosis or scars. To suction the laser plume and irrigate the lesion base, the suction–irrigator is placed next to or behind the lesion, removing char and identi­fying any vascular structure within the operative field. If carbon is allowed to accumulate, the field is obscured. In either situa­tion, carbon may be mistaken for endometriosis. Therefore, if vaporization is chosen, it is important to copiously irrigate and remove the charred areas to confirm complete removal of the lesion and avoid confusing endometriosis with a carbon deposit.
Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis 271
https://t.me/med1917
Without Hydrodissection With Hydrodissection
0.5cm. opening
Round ligament
Fallopian tube
Ovary
Wheal formed by injection of lactated Ringer’s solution
Peritoneum
Pararectal space
Injection site 1
Paravesical
space
Inj. site 2
Ureter
Bladder
Inj. site 3
Rectum
Uterus
Uterosacral ligament
Peritoneum raised off of pararectal space and rectum
Peritoneum raised from the bladder
Peritoneum raised off of ureter
Peritoneum raised from pelvic wall
Ringer’s solution infused
Ureter
Figure 10.3.3. Hydrodissection protects retroperitoneal structures such as the bladder, ureter, and blood vessels from the CO2laser. The insets show the creation of retroperitoneal space.
When used in the superpulse/ultrapulse mode, this laser achieves more rapid vaporization and decreased carbonization.
The accepted histologic criterion for the diagnosis of endometriosis is the presence of endometrial glands and stroma.[93] Chernobilsky and Morris [94] described a vari-
Resection of Ovarian Endometriosis
The ovaries are a common site for endometriosis. Ovarian endometriosis causes adhesions between the ovarian surface and the broad ligament. In 1921, Sampson [90] noted that the his­tologic findings varied in different portions of the same cyst. Some implants also developed from spilling of the contents of endometriomas after rupture, resulting in the invasion of func­tional cysts by these surface implants. Large endometriomas could develop because of secondary involvement of follicular or luteal cysts by surface implants. Ovarian implants are simi­lar to endometriosis in extra-ovarian sites and are limited in size by fibrosis and scarring. Endometriomas might originate from metaplasia of the celomic epithelium that lines the cystic epithelial inclusions that frequently are found in the ovaries.[91,92] Samp­son [90] believed that there was local spread of endometriosis by salpingeal reflux.
ety of epithelial characteristics found in ovarian endometrio­sis. Nissole-Pochet and associates [95] studied 113 instances of ovarian endometriosis before and after hormone therapy. Those authors could identify typical endometrial glandular epithelium and stroma. In 18%, only the endometrial epithelium lined the cyst. Areas with ciliated cells representing oviduct-like epithe­lium were observed in 47%. In the others, flattened endometrial epithelium and typical glandular and stromal structures were seen. Martin and Berry [96] examined 41 “chocolate” cysts and found that 61% were endometriomas, 27% were corpora lutea, and in 12%, no lining was found. Vercellini and coworkers [84] confirmed 97.7% of visually diagnosed endometriomas by using at least two of the following microscopic patterns to diagnose them: (1) the presence of endometrial epithelium, (2) endome­trial glands or glandlike structures, or (3) endometrial stroma and hemosiderin-laden macrophages.
272 Bulent Berker, Thomas H. S. Hsu, Keith L. Lee, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, and Camran Nezhat
https://t.me/med1917
and are difficult to excise. Microscopically, endometrial tissue is seen in all of them. Although small, these endometriomas are difficult to remove intact because of associated fibrosis and adhe­sions. They can be biopsied, drained, and vaporized by using a laser or electrosurgery or removed in pieces.
Type IIA endometriomas are hemorrhagic cysts and grossly look like endometriomas. The cyst wall is separated easily from the ovarian tissue. Endometriotic implants are superficial and adjacent to a hemorrhagic cyst, which is either follicular or luteal in origin; microscopically, no endometrial lining is seen.
In type IIA lesions, the peri-ovarian adhesions are lysed, the ovarian cortex is evaluated, and the cyst is aspirated. Superficial ovarian implants adjacent to the cyst are vaporized or excised. The cyst is opened, its wall is examined, and a biopsy specimen is taken for frozen section. If it has a yellowish appearance, removal is easy (Figure 10.3.6). Postoperatively,either danazol 800 mg/day or a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue may be used for 6 to 8 weeks.
In type IIB lesions, the cyst lining is separated easily from the ovarian capsule andstroma,except near the endometrialimplant. Intype IIC lesions, surface endometrial implantspenetratedeeply into the cyst wall, making excision difficult. Histologic findings of endometriosis are seen in the cyst wall in these two subtypes. The basis for differentiating between these two subtypes is the progressive difficulty in removing the cyst wall.
Type IIB and type IIC endometriomas are large and are associated with peri-ovarian adhesions that attach them to the pelvic side wall and the back of the uterus. When suction and
Superficial endometriosis of the ovary
Figure 10.3.4. Superficial implants are seen on this ovary.
irrigation are alternated, the contents are removed. The inside of the cyst is examined, and the portion of ovarian cortex involved with endometriosis is removed. Using the grasping forceps and the suction–irrigator probe,the cyst wall isgrasped and separated from the ovarian stroma by traction and countertraction.[101]
Endometriotic implants or endometriomas less than 2 cm in diameter are coagulated, laser ablated, or excised, using scissors, biopsy forceps, lasers,orelectrodes (Figure 10.3.4).Forsuccessful eradication, all visible lesions and scars must be removed from the ovarian surface. Entrapment of oocytes within the luteinized ovarian follicle,as reported in experimental animalmodels, must be avoided.[97]Drainingtheendometrioma or partially resecting its wall is inadequate because the endometrial tissueliningthecyst can remain functionaland may cause the symptomsto recur.[98] However, photocoagulation of the cyst wall has been equally therapeutic and occasionally less difficult.[41,99,100] Brosens and Puttemansi [99] recommended cytology and biopsy of the cyst wall before ablating the cyst. When a double optic laparo­scope,whichinvolvesthepassageofasmalleroperative endoscope through thechannel of the main laparoscope, is used, theovarian cyst is punctured and drained, the fluid is sent for cytology, and the lining is inspected visually. Any suspicious area is biopsied, and the specimen is sent for frozen section. Once it has been ascertained that the cyst is not malignant, its wall is ablated to a depth of 3 to 4 mm using a laser or an electrocoagulator intro­duced through the operative channel of the second laparoscope. This procedure is analogous to endometrial ablation and seems to be successful, with no recurrence on follow-up ultrasound or second-look laparoscopy.
Endometriomas can be classified as types I to IV. Type I endometriomas are 1 to 2 cm in size and contain dark fluid (Fig­ure 10.3.5). They develop from surface endometriotic implants
Small blood vessels from the ovarian bed and bleeding from the ovarian hilum are controlled with bipolar electrocoagulation.
In type IIC lesions, it is difficult to develop a cleavage plane between the cyst wall and the ovarian stroma. The portion of the ovary attached tothecyst wall is removeduntil a clear boundaryis found so that the entire cyst can be extirpated. The remainder of the procedure is similar to that which was described earlier. The edges of theovarian defect are brought together with a low-power laser or electrosurgery. Low-power, continuous laser or bipolar coagulation applied to the inside wall of the redundant ovarian capsule causes it to invert. Excessive coagulation of the adjacent ovarian stroma must be avoided. If sutures are needed, they are placed inside the capsule, and 4-0 polyglycolic material is used. Fewer sutures result in fewer adhesions.[102]
The least invasive and technically simplest approach to endometriomas involves laparoscopic fenestration and removal of “chocolate” fluid without cystectomy or ablation of the cyst wall. However, fenestration and irrigation are ineffective, as evi­denced by a 50% recurrence rate. Fayez and Vogel [103] made a wide opening in the cyst wall to drain its contents. They claimed that their technique created fewer periadnexal adhesions (27%). Vercellini andassociates[99]showedthataspirationofthe cyst and irrigation of the endometriomas were ineffective. In 33 women, most endometriomas recurred, although many patients took GnRH analogues postoperatively. Hasson [98] noted recur­rences in eight of nine endometriomas treated by fenestration alone.
Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis 273
https://t.me/med1917
Ovarian ligament
Type I endometrioma
Ovary
AB
Figure 10.3.5. (A) Type I endometriomas are small,contain dark fluid, and develop from surface implants. (B) They are difficult to remove intact because of associated adhesions and fibrosis.
Endometrial implant on the ovarian cortex with no attachment on the cyst wall
Functional cyst
Endometrial implant
Type IIA
Cyst wall
Figure 10.3.6. A functional cyst with a small endometriotic implant.
Ovarian cortex
For endometriomas over 2 cm in diameter, the cyst is punc­tured with the 5-mm trocar and aspirated with the suction– irrigator probe. Using high-pressure irrigation at 500 to 800 mm Hg, thecyst is irrigated, causing it to expand, andis aspirated sev­eral times.[104] This procedure allows examination of the cyst wall. After the repeated expansion and shrinkage with irrigation and suction, the cyst wall should separate from the surrounding ovarian stroma(Figure10.3.7).Ifitdoesnot,5to20 mLoflactated Ringer’ssolution is injected between thestroma and the cyst wall. The cyst wall is removed by grasping its base with laparoscopic forceps and peeling it from the ovarian stroma (Figure 10.3.8). If this isnot successful, thewall is separatedfrom the ovarian cortex with forceps at the puncture site. A cleavage plane is created by pulling the two forceps apart and cutting between the structures. Use of the laser or electrosurgery minimizes bleeding because the blood vessels supplying the endometrioma are usually small enough to be cutandcoagulatedsimultaneously. Anothermethod involves hydrodissection of the plane between the cyst wall and the ovarianstroma.[23,43] These techniques may beapplied suc­cessfully to completely remove the cyst wall, whichshould be sent for histologic evaluation to rule out malignancy. If the entire cyst cannot be separated from the ovary, the adherent sections are ablated or coagulated.[98–100,104] When the entire cyst wall is ablated, representative biopsy specimens are taken for histo­logic diagnosis. These endometriomas tend to rupture during separation because of their adherence to other pelvic structures. Because it is difficult to develop a plane between the cyst wall and the ovarian stroma, the portion of the ovary attached to the
274 Bulent Berker, Thomas H. S. Hsu, Keith L. Lee, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, and Camran Nezhat
https://t.me/med1917
Endometrial implant has reached the cyst wall
Functional cyst
Endometrial implant
A
Functional cyst
Type IIB
Ovarian cortex
Cyst wall
Uterus
Filmy adhesions
Pelvic sidewall
Ovary
Type IIB
Endometrial implant
B
Figure 10.3.7. (A) A type IIB endometrioma with features of a functional cyst involved deeply with histologic findings of endometriosis in the cyst wall. The cyst wall is separated easily from the ovarian capsule and stroma except where adjacent to the areas of endometriosis. (B) In this type IIB lesion, the endometriotic implant has reached the cyst wall. (Continued )
Functional cyst
https://t.me/med1917
Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis 275
Uterus
Dense adhesions
Ovary
Type IIC
Endometrial implant
C
Figure 10.3.7. (Continued )(C) Extensiveperi-ovarianadhesionsarepresent, andthere ismoreextensive involve- ment of the cyst wall with endometriotic implants. When suction and irrigation are alternated, the inside of the cyst can be explored.
cyst wall is removed until an area is located to produce a line of cleavage.
Cyst wall closure is not necessary, according to animal exper­iments [105] and clinical experience.[106] For large defects that result from resecting endometriomas larger than 5 cm, the edges of the ovariancortexare approximatedwith a singlesutureplaced within the ovarian stroma. The knot is tied inside the ovary so that no part of the suture penetrates the ovarian cortex or is exposed to the ovarian surface to minimize adhesion formation. Fibrin sealant has been described to atraumatically approximate the edges of large ovarian defects (Figure 10.3.9).[107]
Rare patients present with localized symptoms and severe involvement of the ovary with disease and adhesions while the opposite ovary is normal, requiring unilateral salpingo­oophorectomy. When the diseased ovary is removed, the risk of disease recurrence is minimized, and the fertility potential is improved by limiting ovulation to the healthy side. In a prospec­tive trial, Beretta and coauthors [108] randomly allocated 64 patients with advanced stages of endometriosis toundergo either cystectomy of the endometrioma or drainage of the endometri­oma and bipolar coagulation of the inner lining. The 24-month cumulative recurrence rates of dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain were lower in the patients who underwent cystectomy than in those who did not (dysmenor­rhea, 15.8% vs. 52.9%;deep dyspareunia, 20% vs. 75%;nonmen­strual pelvic pain, 10% vs. 52.9%). The median interval between the operation and the recurrence of moderate to severe pelvic
Pelvic sidewall
pain was longer after cystectomy: 19 months compared with 5 months. The 24-month cumulative pregnancy rate was higher after cystectomy: 66.7%comparedwith 23.5%.For the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, a better outcome with a similar rate of complications is achieved with laparoscopic cystectomy than with drainage and coagulation.
The efficacy of laparoscopy done by applying the stripping technique was compared retrospectively with that of micro­surgery by laparotomy in 132 women under 40 years of age with ovarian endometriotic cysts at least 3 cm in diameter, stages III and IV endometriosis, rAFS classification.[109] The recurrence rate of ovarian cysts, symptomatic improvement, and the repro­ductive outcomewerefound to be comparable for thetwogroups. However, as was expected, laparoscopy resulted in less postoper­ative febrile morbidity and a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization. The long-term results of laparoscopic fenestra­tion and coagulation of ovarian endometriomas were investigated in a case-control study and compared with the results of ovar­ian cystectomy done by either laparotomy or laparoscopy.[110] The study enrolled 156 premenopausal women with ovarian endometriomas at least 3 cm in diameter, stages III and IV endometriosis, rAFS classification. The mean time to first preg­nancy wasshorter in the 80 patientswho underwent laparoscopic ovarian fenestration and coagulation (1.4 years) than it was in the 23 patients who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (2.2 years) or the 53 patients who underwent ovarian cystec­tomy by laparotomy and a microsurgical technique (2.4 years).
276 Bulent Berker, Thomas H. S. Hsu, Keith L. Lee, Ceana Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, and Camran Nezhat
https://t.me/med1917
Cortical endometrial implant has reached the cyst wall and is firmly attached
Cyst wall
Type IIB
Endometrial implant
A
Figure 10.3.8. (A) The lining is separated easily from the ovarian capsule and stroma except where adjacent to the areas of endometriosis.
Cyst wall has been removed from the ovarian stroma
Ovarian cortex with the endometrial implant has been removed
Removing type IIB
B
Figure 10.3.8. (B) The cyst wall has been removed, and a piece of the ovarian cortex with the endometrial implant has been excised. Using the grasping forceps and the suction–irrigator probe, the cyst wall is separated from the ovarian cortex by traction and countertraction.