Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4479_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Ducic Pearls
- •Advancement Flap
- •Rotational Flap
- •Transposition Flap
- •1: Local Flaps
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •2: Facial Regional Flaps
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique
- •Paramedian Forehead Flap
- •Melolabial Flap
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •3: Nasal Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Implant Materials
- •Prosthetic Materials
- •Prosthetic Placement
- •Site-Specific Considerations
- •Auricular Reconstruction
- •Auricular Alloplastic Implant Reconstruction
- •Auricular Prosthetics
- •Nasal Reconstruction
- •Maxillary/Midface Reconstruction
- •Orbital Reconstruction
- •Ocular Implants
- •Orbital Prosthesis
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Musculature
- •Innervation
- •Arterial Supply
- •Reconstructive Ladder Approach
- •Perioperative Care
- •Intraoperative Setup
- •Postoperative Care
- •Partial Thickness Reconstruction
- •Partial Thickness Defects: Vermillion
- •Secondary Intention
- •Vermillion Advancement Flap
- •FAMM Flap [17]
- •Partial Thickness Defects: Cutaneous
- •Primary Closure
- •Skin Grafting
- •Local Flaps
- •Ergotrid Flap
- •Melolabial Flap
- •Full Thickness Reconstruction
- •Special Considerations: Lower Lip
- •Small Defects
- •Larger Defects
- •Special Considerations: Upper Lip
- •Local Flaps
- •Bilateral Lip Advancement Flap
- •Stair-Step Advancement Flap
- •Alar Crescent Flap
- •Karapandzic Flap
- •Gillies Fan Flap
- •Bernard–von Burow (and Webster Modification)
- •Local Flaps: Cross-Lip Flaps
- •Abbe Flap
- •Extended Abbe Flap
- •Estlander Flap
- •Free Tissue Transfer
- •Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Managing Microstomia
- •Commissuroplasty
- •Summary
- •References
- •6: Pectoralis Major Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Neurovascular Supply
- •Advantages
- •Flap Usage
- •Case Examples
- •Complications
- •Disadvantages
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Important Considerations
- •References
- •7: Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Arterial Anatomy
- •Venous Anatomy
- •Neural Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Ducic Pearls
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •8: Free Rectus Flap Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Operative Steps
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Flap Features
- •Pearls
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •9: The Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indication/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Donor Site Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Pearls/Pitfalls
- •References
- •10: Cervicodeltopectoral Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Neurovascular Supply
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Advantages
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Disadvantages
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Important Considerations
- •Important Dimensions
- •Skin Island Dimensions
- •Artery
- •Vein
- •Nerve
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Usage
- •Complications
- •Case Example
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Relevant Anatomy [and Nomenclature]
- •The Trapezius Muscle
- •Regional Anatomy
- •Blood Supply: Nomenclature
- •Flap Nomenclature
- •Operative Technique
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Positioning
- •Harvest Technique
- •Upper Trapezius Flap
- •Lower Trapezius Flap
- •Trapezius Free Flap
- •Donor-Site Morbidity
- •Limitations
- •Indications
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •12: Supraclavicular Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Surgical Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •13: The Free Fibula Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indication/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Donor Site Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Pearls/Pitfalls
- •References
- •History
- •Vascular System
- •Muscle
- •Bone
- •Fasciocutaneous Flaps
- •Operative Technique
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Scapular Tip Flap
- •Chimeric Flaps
- •Fascial Flaps
- •Virtual Surgical Planning
- •Midface Reconstruction
- •Mandible Reconstruction
- •Dental Implants
- •Limitations
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •15: The Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Introduction
- •Historical
- •Anatomy
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Clinical Exam
- •Imaging
- •Instrumentation/Requirements
- •Design/Technique
- •Patient Positioning
- •Radius Osteotomy
- •Proximal Donor Vessel Preparation
- •Nonvascularized Donor Site Reconstruction Techniques
- •Vascularized Soft Tissue Donor Site Reconstruction Techniques
- •Postop Management
- •Complications
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Iliac Crest Nonvascularized Bone Harvest
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Wound Closure
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •Pearls
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Buccal Branch Identification
- •Masseteric Nerve Identification
- •Nerve Transfer
- •Pearls
- •References
- •18: Outpatient Periocular Reanimation
- •Introduction
- •Pretarsal Upper Eyelid Weight Placement
- •Lateral Tarsal Strip Canthoplasty
- •Pearls
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Fascia Lata Harvest
- •Static Facial Suspension
- •Pearls
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Recipient Site Preparation
- •Sural Nerve Harvest
- •Cross-Face Nerve Grafting
- •Sterno-omohyoid Muscle Flap Harvest
- •Sterno-omohyoid Muscle Flap Inset
- •Pearls
- •References
- •21: Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instruments/Equipment
- •Surgical Technique
- •Marking
- •Surgical Steps/Incisions
- •Closing/Suturing
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •22: Cleft Palate Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instruments/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Pearls
- •Von Langenbeck Palatoplasty
- •Two-Flap Palatoplasty (Bardach)
- •Special Considerations
- •Postoperative Management
- •Outcomes
- •Oronasal Fistula Rate
- •Velopharyngeal Dysfunction
- •Facial Growth
- •Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
- •References
- •23: Mandible Trauma Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Body
- •Condylar
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment
- •Surgical Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •24: Midface Trauma Reconstruction
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Classification
- •Clinical Assessment
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Setup
- •Site-Specific Surgical Techniques
- •Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures
- •Le Fort II Fractures
- •Pan Facial Fractures
- •Pediatric Midface Fracture Management
- •Complications
- •References
- •25: Frontal Sinus Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Anterior Table
- •Posterior Table
- •Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract
- •Grafts
- •Autologous Bone Grafts
- •Alloplastic Implants
- •Titanium Mesh
- •Medpor (Porous Polyethylene)
- •PEEK (Polyether-Ether Ketone)
- •Hydroxyapatite Cement
- •Methyl Methacrylate
- •Pericranial Flap
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •26: Orbital Trauma Reconstruction
- •Intro/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preop Planning/Workup
- •Instruments/Setup
- •Surgical Technique/Pearls (Treatment)
- •Postop Management
- •References
- •27: Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Surgical Technique: Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
- •Grade 0
- •Grade 1
- •Grade 2
- •Grade 3
- •Intranasal Vascularized Pedicled Flaps
- •Nasoseptal Flap (Hadad-Bassagasteguy Flap)
- •Posterior Pedicle Inferior Turbinate Flap
- •Posterior Pedicle Middle Turbinate Flap
- •Regional Vascularized Extranasal Flaps
- •Endoscopic-Assisted Pericranial Flap
- •Temporoparietal Fascial Flap
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •28: Open (Anterior) Skull Base Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Planning
- •Anatomic Factors
- •Patient Factors
- •Surgical Technique
- •Free Tissue Transfer
- •Temporoparietal Fascia Flap (TPFF)
- •Temporalis Muscle Flap
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Index

84
border
S. Kohlert
Excise
Preserve
vermilion
Fig. 5.18 Extended Abbe ap
skin
Abbe flap extends
to inferior chin
advancement
Extended
Abbe flap
Cheek
and functional results for patients with large-scale defects of the lip and chin [51,
52], although there have been reports of long-term loss of oral competence in cer-
tain patients [16].
Modications to the RFFF technique aimed at providing dynamic reconstructions of major lip defects. Grinsell and Herle recently described a composite procedure including an innervated pronator quadratus muscle ap coapted to the buccal
branch for motor innervation and to the mental nerve (in lower lip reconstruction)
or infraorbital nerve (upper lip reconstruction) for sensory input [53].
Alternative Donor Sites forFree Tissue Transfer
While the RFFF is the workhorse for total lip and chin defects, other donor sites are
occasionally used for free tissue transfer as well. Functional gracilis muscle aps
(covered by split thickness skin grafts) can be employed for total lip defects. Studies
have demonstrated satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes (with clinical
recovery of sensation to the ap as well as normal pattern motor unit potentials in
the muscle on postoperative needle electromyography studies with this technique)
[54]. Composite defects of the lip and mandible can be reconstructed with osteocutaneous aps from a wide array of donor sites including the radial forearm, bula
[55], scapula [56], and latissimus dorsi with rib [57, 58]. While anterolateral thigh
aps have traditionally been felt to be too bulky for lip reconstruction, “super-thin”
ALT aps have been successfully employed for large lower lip and skin defects with
good success [59]. Details regarding the harvest of many of these aps can be found
in the later chapters of this text.

5 Reconstruction oftheLip
85
Complications ofLip Reconstruction
Complications of lip reconstruction can be divided into short-term and long-term
complications. Short-term complications include pain, infection, wound dehiscence, difculty tolerating a normal diet, ap failure, numbness of the surrounding
area (temporary or permanent), and need for additional surgery. Long-term complications include poor cosmetic result, microstomia (which may impair the patient’s
ability to wear dentures or eat certain foods), abnormal mobility of the lips/facial
muscles, dysarthria, and permanent loss of oral competence (and associated drooling). The risk of many of these complications is mitigated by a proper choice of
reconstructive method and meticulous operative technique, although not all can be
avoided completely (especially in patients presenting with very large and complicated defects).
Managing Microstomia
While the risk can be mitigated, microstomia is a somewhat common complication
of major lip reconstruction, especially in patients with large defects. In our practice,
signicant improvement is often seen when following therapy with a combination
of manual massage techniques, orofacial exercises, as well as the use of formal oral
stretching devices. A wide array of oral appliances have been developed throughout
the years [60]. We employ the Therabite® rehabilitation system (Atos Medical; New
Berlin, WI) for our patients with microstomia and trismus. Unfortunately, the
Therabite® can be prohibitively expensive for many patients, and we often employ
a modication of the thermoplastic mouth stretcher described by Dougherty [60,
61] for home-based exercises in this population.
Commissuroplasty
Blunting of the oral commissure is a potential complication of lip reconstruction,
especially when the defect involves the oral commissure. Given the nature of the
Estlander and Karapandzic aps, blunting is frequently observed after these procedures. Oral commissuroplasty can be performed secondarily to improve the cosmetic result.
There are two primary techniques for commmissuroplasty: buccal mucosal
advancement and myomucosal advancement (of the labial mucosa and the underlying orbicularis oris). Both approaches begin with a triangular-shaped resection of
the skin lateral to the blunted oral commissure, with the apex of the triangle in the
location of the expected position of a normal commissure.
The simpler of the two techniques (and our preferred approach) is the buccal
mucosal advancement ap technique. After wedge resection of the skin lateral to the
blunted commissure, the vermillion over the commissure is excised, and the underlying orbicularis oris is divided horizontally through the commissure. The upper

86
dcba
Mucous memb.
incisions
Fig. 5.19 Oral commissuroplasty
S. Kohlert
and lower muscle edges are then advanced and attached to the skin at the apex of the
previously excised triangular wedge (Fig.5.19). Buccal mucosa is then advanced
over the top of the muscle and secured to the skin with resorbable suture.
A full description of both approaches has been well described in an excellent
review article by Parsel and Winters [62].
Summary
Lip defects are commonly encountered by the head and neck reconstructive surgeons. Neoplasia, trauma, and congenital abnormalities are the most common causes.
There are a wide array of reconstructive options available for upper and lower lip
reconstructions that span the length of the reconstructive ladder. The surgeon should
carefully assess the defect (including which subsites are involved) and select the
least complex reconstructive option available that will result in a satisfactory cosmetic and functional result. Complications of reconstruction include poor cosmetic
result, temporary and/or permanent loss of sensation, impaired motor function and
loss of oral competence, dysarthria, and microstomia. A careful ap selection and
meticulous surgical technique can mitigate the risk of these complications.
References
1. Gatti GL, Freda N, Giacomina A, Montemagni M, Sisti A. Cleft lip and palate repair. J
Craniofac Surg. 2017;28:1918–24.
2. Grunebaum LD, Smith JE, Hoosien GE. Lip and perioral trauma. Facial Plast Surg.
2010;26:433–44.
3. Zitsch RP 3rd, Park CW, Renner GJ, Rea JL.Outcome analysis for lip carcinoma. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:589–96.
4. Peterson DJ, Azad AD, Gkorila A, Patel AA, Boudreault MS, Nazerali RS.Assessing gaze
patterns in common cosmetic procedures with eye-tracking technology. Ann Plast Surg.
2020;84:S268–72.
5. Sebben JE. Wedge resection of the lip: minimizing problems. J Dermatol Surg Oncol.
1985;11:60–4.

5 Reconstruction oftheLip
6. Tan RA, Mulder FJ, Schwirtz RMF, Mosmuller DGM, De Vet HCW, Griot JPWD.Atypical
outcomes of nasal and lip appearance after unilateral cleft lip repair: judgment by professionals, patients, and laypeople. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58:1226–35.
7. Burget GC, Menick FJ.Aesthetic restoration of one-half the upper lip. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1986;78:583–93.
8. Luce EA.Upper lip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:999–1007.
9. Janfaza P.Surgical anatomy of the head and neck. Harvard University Press; 2011.
10. Vanison C, Beckmann N, Smith A. Recent advances in lip reconstruction. Curr Opin
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27:219–26.
11. Ono T, Hori K, Masuda Y, Hayashi T.Recent advances in sensing oropharyngeal swallowing
function in Japan. Sensors. 2010;10:176–202.
12. Dey JK, Ishii M, Boahene KDO, Byrne P, Ishii LE.Impact of facial defect reconstruction on
attractiveness and negative facial perception. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:1316–21.
13. Lee EH, Klassen AF, Lawson JL, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Patient experiences and
outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery: a qualitative study. Australas J Dermatol.
2016;57:e100–4.
14. Wang T-J, Lu M-H, Kuo P-L, Chen Y-W, Lee S-C, Liang S-Y.Inuences of facial disgurement and social support for psychosocial adjustment among patients with oral cancer in
Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e023670.
15. Gloster HM Jr. The use of second-intention healing for partial-thickness Mohs defects involving the vermilion and/or mucosal surfaces of the lip. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:893–7.
16. Sanniec K, Harirah M, Thornton JF. Lip reconstruction after Mohs cancer excision: lessons
learned from 615 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:533–42.
17. Pribaz JJ, Meara JG, Wright S, Smith JD, Stephens W, Breuing KH.Lip and vermilion reconstruction with the facial artery musculomucosal ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:864–72.
18. Becker S, Lee MR, Thornton JF.Ergotrid ap: a local ap for cutaneous defects of the upper
lateral lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:460e–4e.
19. Roh DS, Bojovic B, Woolard AC, Donelan MB.Triangular fossa graft for philtral reconstruction after facial burns: a 34-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84:144–8.
20. Yen C-I, Chen H-C, Hsiao Y-C, Chang S-Y, Chuang S-S.Upper lip reconstruction with modication for creating a philtrum with single-stage full-thickness skin graft in burned face injury.
Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83:513–7.
21. Baumann D, Robb G.Lip reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2008;22:269–80.
22. Gómez A, Pomares A. Primary W-plasty closure for surgical repair of the injured lip. J
Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:e57–8.
23. Harris L, Higgins K, Enepekides D.Local ap reconstruction of acquired lip defects. Curr
Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20:254–61.
24. Uglesic V, Amin K, Dediol E, Kosutic D.Combined Karapandzic-Abbé/Estlander/Stein ap
for subtotal and total lower lip reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:484–90.
25. Salgarelli AC, Bellini P, Magnoni C, Anesi A, Collini M.Synergistic use of local aps for total
lower lip reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37:1666–70.
26. Campos MA, Varela P, Marques C. Near-total lower lip reconstruction: combined
Karapandzic and Bernard-Burrow-Webster ap. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat.
2017;26:19–20.
27. Gunnarsson GL, Demmissie MB, Havemann I, Topstad TK, Thomsen JB.Complete lower lip
reconstruction with a large lip switch ap and a composite modiolus advancement ap. Plast
Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1607.
28. Oseni OG, Fadare AE, Majaro MO, Olaitan PB.Total reconstruction of the upper lip using
bilateral nasolabial aps, submental ap, and mucosa graft following complete resection for
squamous cell carcinoma. Case Rep Surg. 2015;2015:782151.
29. Williams EF 3rd, Setzen G, Mulvaney MJ.Modied Bernard-Burow cheek advancement and
cross-lip ap for total lip reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:1253–8.
87

88
30. Johanson B, Aspelund E, Breine U, Holmström H.Surgical treatment of non-traumatic lower
lip lesions with special reference to the step technique. A follow-up on 149 patients. Scand J
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;8:232–40.
31. Spinelli HM, Tabatabai N, Muzaffar AR, Isenberg JS.Upper lip reconstruction with the alar
crescent ap: a new approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1566–70.
32. Karapandzic M. Reconstruction of lip defects by local arterial aps. Br J Plast Surg.
1974;27:93–7.
33. Hanasono MM, Langstein HN.Extended karapandzic aps for near-total and total lower lip
defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1199–205.
34. Dediol E, Čvrljević I, Dobranić M, Uglešić V.Extended karapandzic ap technique for reconstruction of lower lip and chin defect. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76:213–20.
35. Gillies H, Millard DR.The principles and art of plastic surgery. Butterworth; 1957.
36. Bhama PK.Lip reconstruction using the gillies fan ap. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2020;31:18–20.
37. Bernard C.Cancer de la levre inferieure opere par un procede nouveau. Bull Mem Soc Chir
Paris. 1853;3:357–64.
38. Von Burow CA. Beschreibung einer neuen Trasplantations-Method (Method der seitlichen
Dreiecke) zum Wiederersatz verlorengegangener Teile des Gesichts. Berlin: Nauk; 1855.
39. Webster RC, Coffey RJ, Kelleher RE.Total and partial reconstruction of the lower lip with
innervated muscle-bearing aps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;25:360.
40. Renner GJ.Reconstruction of the lip. In: Baker SR, editor. Local aps in facial reconstruction.
Elsevier; 2014. p.481–529.
41. Renner GJ, Zitsch RP 3rd. Reconstruction of the lip. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1990;23:975–90.
42. Sabattini P (1838) Cenno storico dell’origine e progressi dela rinoplastica e cheiloplastica
seguita dalla descrizione di queste operazioni Praticamente eseguite sopra un solo individuo.
43. Stein SA. Lip repair (cheiloplasty) performed by a new method. Hospitals-Meddelelser.
1848;1:212–6.
44. Estlander JA.Eine Methode aus der einen Lippe Substanzverluste der anderen zu ersetzen.
Arch Klin Chir. 1872;14:622–31.
45. Abbe R.A new plastic operation for the relief of deformity due to double harelip. Med Rec.
1898;53:1866.
46. Kriet JD, Cupp CL, Sherris DA, Murakami CS. The extended Abbé ap. Laryngoscope.
1995;105:988–92.
47. Smith JW. The anatomical and physiologic acclimatization of tissue transplanted by the lip
switch technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1960;26:40–56.
48. Thompson N, Pollard AC.Motor function in Abbe aps. A histochemical study of motor reinnervation in transplanted muscle tissue of the lips in man. Br J Plast Surg. 1961;14:66–75.
49. Rea JL, Davis WE, Rittenhouse LK.Reinnervation of an Abbe-Estlander and a Gillies fan ap
of the lower lip: electromyographic comparison. Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104:294–5.
50. Sakai S, Soeda S, Endo T, Ishii M, Uchiumi E.A compound radial artery forearm ap for the
reconstruction of lip and chin defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:337–8.
51. Carroll CM, Pathak I, Irish J, Neligan PC, Gullane PJ.Reconstruction of total lower lip and
chin defects using the composite radial forearm—palmaris longus tendon free ap. Arch Facial
Plast Surg. 2000;2:53–6.
52. Jeng S-F, Kuo Y-R, Wei F-C, Su C-Y, Chien C-Y.Total lower lip reconstruction with a composite radial forearm-palmaris longus tendon ap: a clinical series. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;113:19–23.
53. Grinsell D, Herle P. Composite pronator quadratus: radial forearm free ap in functional lip
reconstruction. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89:940–4.
54. Coskunrat OK, Bektas G, Cinpolat A, Unal K, Coskunrat N.Experiences with functional
gracilis muscle ap in lower lip reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2017;37:487–93.
55. Godefroy WP, Klop WMC, Smeele LE, Lohuis PJFM.Free-ap reconstruction of large fullthickness lip and chin defects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121:594–603.
S. Kohlert

5 Reconstruction oftheLip
56. Jacobson L, Dedhia R, Kokot N, Chalian A.Scapular osteocutaneous free ap for total lower
lip and mandible reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2016;36:480–4.
57. Huang R, Blackwell KE.Microvascular reconstruction of composite defects of the mandible
and lip: aesthetic and functional considerations. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1066–9.
58. Trignano E, Fallico N, Nitto A, Chen H-C.The treatment of composite defect of bone and soft
tissues with a combined latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior and rib free ap. Microsurgery.
2013;33:173–83.
59. Bali ZU, Ozkan B, Parspancı A, Kececi Y, Yoleri L.Reconstruction of lower lip defects with
free super-thin anterolateral thigh ap. Microsurgery. 2021;41:216–22.
60. Dougherty ME, Warden GD.A thirty-year review of oral appliances used to manage microstomia, 1972 to 2002. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003;24:418–31; discussion 410.
61. Dougherty ME, Schwanholt CA. Thermoplastic mouth stretcher. J Burn Care Rehabil.
2001;22:S151.
62. Parsel SM, Winters RD. Commissuroplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2020;31:33–7.
89

Part II
Muscular and Musculocutaneous Flaps

Pectoralis Major Flap
NimaVahidi, KevinQuinn, CherylYu, SeungLee,
andThomasS.Lee
Introduction
Reconstructive surgery with the pectoralis major myocutaneous ap was rst
described in 1968; however, it wasn’t until Ariyan in 1979 that its application in
head and neck reconstruction was well described [1–3]. It is now commonly used in
the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, as well as external skin defects of the face and neck. The pectoralis ap offers
both myocutaneous and myofascial ap options to support reconstruction needs.
Prior to wide-scale adoption of microvascular free tissue transfer in the 1980s,
the pectoralis myocutaneous ap was used extensively for head and neck reconstruction. It still remains a popular reconstructive option in developing nations with
a limited access to microvascular surgery and is now used selectively in developed
nations, particularly in the setting of salvage surgery or in patients without adequate
donor vessels for free ap reconstruction [4].
6
N. Vahidi · C. Yu · S. Lee · T. S. Lee (*)
Department of Otolaryngology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center,
Richmond, VA, USA
e-mail: Nima.vahidi@vcuhealth.org; Cheryl.yu@vcuhealth.org; Seong.lee@vcu.edu;
Thomas.Lee@vcuhealth.org
K. Quinn
Department of Otolaryngology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
e-mail: Kevin.quinn@osumc.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2024
F. Sokoya, A. G. Vincent (eds.), Manual of Head and Neck Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65999-7_6
93

94
N. Vahidi et al.
Anatomy
The pectoralis major muscle is situated in the upper chest and functions to rotate
and adduct the arm. It has four sites of origin which include the anterior surface of
the medial half of the clavicle, the anterior surface of the lateral half of the manubrium and sternum, the costal cartilage from the second to sixth ribs, and the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. From these points, the muscle bers
converge laterally toward their insertion on the humerus. The pectoralis minor muscle, which lies deep to the pectoralis major, originates from the anterior surface of
the third and fth ribs and inserts on the coracoid process of the scapula. It functions
to draw the scapula downward and forward. Typically, there is an avascular, fatty
tissue plane present between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor within which
the motor nerve to the pectoralis major muscle is found. Deep to the pectoralis
muscles are the serratus anterior and intercostal muscles. Superolaterally, the pectoralis major muscle is bordered by the deltoid muscle.
Neurovascular Supply
The pectoralis major ap is an axial ap based on the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery and vein (Fig.6.1). The thoracoacromial artery is a branch of the
axillary artery which is itself a continuation of the subclavian artery and can be
traced back to the aorta.
The thoracoacromial trunk arises from the second segment of the axillary artery
associated with the pectoralis minor muscle and has four distal branches including
the acromial, humeral, clavicular, and pectoral branches. The pectoral branch travels along the deep surface of the pectoralis major muscle (supercial to the pectoralis minor muscle) and provides the majority of its blood supply. The lateral thoracic
artery, which also arises from the second segment of the axillary artery, provides a
secondary blood supply but is often sacriced to maximize ap reach which can be
restricted by its lateral attachment. The pectoralis perforator vessels may also provide supplemental blood supply to the overlying skin.
The venous drainage of the pectoralis major mirrors the arterial supply, with
pectoral veins draining directly to the axillary vein. The cephalic vein which provides venous drainage for the upper extremities also supports the drainage of portions of the skin overlying the pectoralis muscle.
The pectoralis major muscle is innervated by the medial and lateral pectoral
nerves which arise from the brachial plexus. Additionally, the pectoralis major and
minor receive innervation from the seventh and eight cervical and rst thoracic
nerves. Of note, the motor nerve that innervates the pectoralis major muscle is often
sacriced during the harvesting process. It will appear as a nerve structure that
pierces the pectoralis minor muscle and enters the pectoralis major muscle from its
deep aspect. The denervated pectoralis major muscle will often lose signicant soft
tissue volume as a result of muscle atrophy, which can be advantageous in certain
scenarios where such loss of tissue bulk is desired. However, if this volume loss is
undesirable, such as if the ap is being used for near total glossectomy

oral branch of
6 Pectoralis Major Flap
Clavicle
Pect
thoracoacromial
artery/vein
Pectoralis minor
muscle
Lateral thoracic
artery
Pectoralis major
muscle
Xyphoid
Fig. 6.1 Anatomical depiction of the left chest, highlighting surgical landmarks for the pectoralis
ap harvest. Halfway point along the clavicle marks the approximate location where the pectoral
branch of thoracoacromial artery and vein is located immediately deep to the pectoralis major
muscle. The pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial artery provides the primary blood supply for
the pectoralis major, while the lateral thoracic is a secondary blood vessel and is often sacriced
during ap harvest
95
reconstruction, the surgeon should consider providing additional muscle and soft
tissue bulk as in anticipation of these post-operative changes.
Advantages
– The pectoralis ap offers a single-stage reconstructive option.
– It is a relatively easy ap to harvest and offers an abundance of soft tissue volume
as well as a large skin ap for reconstruction.
– The vascular supply of the pectoralis ap is reliably identiable within a well-
established tissue plane located deep to the pectoralis major muscle.
– The tissue bulk and well-vascularized nature of the pectoralis major ap afford it
a superior ability to withstand contamination with saliva, tissue infection, or
radiation damage. It also typically lies outside the primary radiation elds for
head and neck cancer and can provide healthy, non-radiated tissues in the previ-
ously irradiated patient. Thus, it is ideal for intraoral, pharyngeal mucosal defects
in patients who are poor free ap candidates. Furthermore, it is the ap of choice
in situations where there is a potential for carotid artery injury or exposure in the
setting of a radical neck dissection with resection of sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
