Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5205_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •2.3 Diagnostic Modalities
- •2.4 Antibiotic Stewardship Principles
- •1.1 Historical Background
- •1.2 Epidemiology
- •1.4 Management
- •1.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.5 Surgical Management
- •Bibliography
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Pharmacokinetics
- •3.3 Fluoroquinolones
- •3.6 Cephalosporins
- •3.7 Ceftobiprole
- •3.9 Linezolid
- •3.11 Daptomycin
- •3.12 Fosfomycin
- •3.15 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Aetiology
- •4.1.2 Risk Factors
- •4.1.2.2 Bacteria
- •4.1.2.3 Other Causative Agents
- •4.2 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
- •4.2.1 Summary
- •References
- •5: Bacterial Resistance
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3.1 Antibiotic Destruction
- •5.3.4 Target Replacement or Target Bypass
- •5.3.5 Target Site Alteration
- •References
- •6.1 Blood Chemistry Tests
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 New Diagnostic Tools
- •7.2.1 Serological Tests
- •7.2.1.1 D-dimer
- •7.2.1.2 Fibrinogen
- •7.2.1.3 Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio
- •7.2.1.4 Procalcitonin
- •7.2.2 Synovial Tests
- •7.2.2.1 Mass Spectrometry
- •7.2.2.2 Alpha Defensin
- •7.2.2.3 Synovial C-Reactive Protein
- •7.2.2.4 Synovial Interlukin-6
- •7.2.2.5 Calprotectin
- •7.2.3.1 Culture Sonication
- •7.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Etiology
- •8.4 Clinical Diagnosis
- •8.5 Laboratory Investigations
- •8.6 Biopsy
- •8.7 Radiological Investigations
- •8.8 Medical Management
- •8.8.1 Acute Osteomyelitis
- •8.8.2 Septic Arthritis
- •8.9 Pyomyositis
- •8.10 Surgical Management
- •8.11 Acute Osteomyelitis
- •8.12 Septic Arthritis
- •8.13 Complications
- •8.14 Chronic Osteomyelitis
- •8.15 Pathological Fractures
- •8.16 Post-infective Segmental Bone Loss
- •8.17 Post-infective Physeal Growth Arrest
- •8.18 Post-septic Hip Sequelae
- •8.19 Summary
- •References
- •9.2 Locations
- •Bibliography
- •10: Chronic Osteomyelitis
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Etiology
- •10.3 Epidemiology
- •10.4 Pathophysiology
- •10.7 Laboratory Test
- •10.8 Diagnostic Radiology
- •10.11 The Host
- •10.12 The Disease
- •10.13 Treatment
- •10.14 Systemic Antibiotic Therapy
- •10.15 Local Antibiotic Depots
- •10.16 Surgical Treatment
- •10.18 Soft Tissue Coverage
- •11.1.6 Imaging
- •11.2 Risk Factors
- •11.3 Common Species
- •10.20 Results
- •10.21 Summary
- •References
- •11.1 Diagnosis
- •11.1.2 Labs
- •11.1.3 Synovial Fluid
- •11.1.4 Culture
- •11.1.5 Histopathology
- •11.4.1 Soft Tissue
- •11.4.2 Bone
- •11.4.3 Joint
- •11.4.4 Periprosthetic
- •References
- •Further Readings
- •12.6 Conclusion
- •12.7 Biography
- •References
- •13.1 Vertebral Osteomyelitis
- •13.1.1 History
- •13.1.2 Epidemiology
- •13.1.3 Pathophysiology
- •13.1.4 Most Common Manifestations
- •13.1.5 Diagnosis
- •13.1.6 Imaging Studies
- •13.1.7 Treatment
- •13.2 Vertebral Tuberculosis
- •13.2.1 History
- •13.2.2 Epidemiology
- •13.2.3 Pathophysiology
- •13.2.4 Most Common Manifestations
- •13.2.5 Pediatric Spinal Tuberculosis
- •13.2.6 Diagnosis
- •13.2.7 Treatment
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.2 Primary Injury
- •14.2.3 Early Versus Late Infection
- •14.2.5.1 Sequestrum
- •14.2.6 Patient Comorbid Factors
- •14.3 Treatment Options
- •14.3.3 Soft Tissue Coverage
- •14.3.4 External Fixation
- •14.3.5 Antibiotic Loaded Cement/Bioceramics
- •14.3.6 Membrane-Induced Osteogenesis (Masquelet Technique)
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Conservative Approach
- •15.1.2 Reconstructive Approach
- •15.2 Pedicled Flaps
- •15.2.1 Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap
- •15.2.1.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.2.3 Gastrocnemius Flap
- •15.2.3.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.2.4 Soleus Flap
- •15.2.4.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.2.5 Vascularized Fibula Flap
- •15.2.5.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.2.6.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.2.7 Sural Flap
- •15.2.7.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.3 Microsurgical Flaps
- •15.3.1 Anterolateral Thigh Flap
- •15.3.1.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.3.2 Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap
- •15.3.2.1 Surgical Technique
- •15.3.3 Gracilis Free-Flap
- •15.3.3.1 Surgical Technique
- •References
- •16: Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (DFO)
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3.3 Radiographic Examinations
- •16.3.3.1 X-ray
- •16.3.3.2 MRI
- •16.3.3.3 PET-CT
- •16.3.4 Biopsy
- •16.4.1 Antibiotics Therapy
- •16.4.2 Conservative Surgery
- •16.4.3 Aggressive Surgery
- •References
- •17.1.1 Osteoradionecrosis (ORN)
- •17.1.1.1 Prevalence
- •17.1.1.3 Management
- •17.1.2 Risk Prediction
- •17.1.2.1 Conclusion
- •17.1.3.1 Medications
- •17.1.3.3 Patients At-Risk
- •17.2 Pathophysiology
- •17.2.1 Bone Remodeling Inhibition
- •17.2.3 Angiogenesis Inhibition
- •17.2.4 Acquired Immune Dysfunction
- •17.3.2 Local Factors
- •17.3.2.1 Dentoalveolar Procedures
- •17.3.2.2 Anatomic Factors
- •17.3.2.3 Concomitant Oral Disease
- •17.3.2.4 Treatment Goals
- •17.3.3 MRONJ Prevention Strategies
- •17.3.4 Treatment Strategies
- •17.3.4.1 Nonoperative Therapy
- •17.3.5 Operative Therapy
- •17.3.6.1 Pulpitis
- •17.3.6.2 Acute Apical Periodontitis (Periapical Abscess)
- •17.3.6.3 Periapical Granuloma
- •17.3.6.4 Periapical Cyst
- •17.3.7.3 Garre’s Sclerosing Osteomyelitis
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Risk Factors
- •18.3 Evidence-Based Preventive Measures
- •18.3.1 Preoperative Measures
- •18.3.1.1 Surgical Hand Preparation
- •18.3.1.5 Preoperative Bathing or Showering
- •18.3.1.6 Preoperative Skin Preparation
- •18.3.1.7 Hair Removal
- •18.3.1.8 Glycemic Control
- •18.3.2 Intraoperative Measures
- •18.3.2.2 Second Dose Antibiotic
- •18.3.2.3 Incisional Wound Irrigation
- •18.3.2.4 Perioperative Oxygenation
- •18.3.2.8 Behavioral Aspects
- •18.3.3 Postoperative Measures
- •18.3.3.1 Postsurgical Wound Care
- •18.3.3.2 Postoperative Antibiotics
- •References
- •19: Periprosthetic Joint Infection: General Aspects
- •19.2 “Local” Patient Risk Factors
- •19.4.1 Presurgical
- •19.4.2 Intraoperative
- •19.4.3 Post-operative
- •19.4.3.1 “Mechanical” Thromboembolic Prophylaxis [101, 102]
- •References
- •20: Low-Grade Periprosthetic Infections
- •20.1 Diagnosis
- •20.3 Outcomes
- •20.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.5.1 Multidisciplinary Approach
- •21.5.2 Surgical Strategies
- •21.5.3 Other Therapeutic Strategies
- •References
- •22.1.1 Introduction
- •22.2 PJI After Shoulder Arthroplasty
- •22.2.1 Epidemiology
- •22.2.2 Risk Factors
- •22.2.3.2 Diagnostic Criteria
- •22.2.3.3 Clinical Presentation
- •22.2.3.4 Radiology
- •22.2.3.6 Synovial Aspirate
- •22.2.4 Management
- •22.2.4.1 Prevention
- •22.2.4.2 Treatment
- •Implant Retention
- •One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
- •Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
- •Antibiotic Spacer
- •Resection Arthroplasty
- •22.3 PJI after Elbow Arthroplasty
- •22.3.2 Risk Factors
- •22.3.3 Diagnosis
- •22.3.4 Treatment
- •22.3.4.1 Implant Retention
- •22.3.4.2 One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
- •22.3.4.3 Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty
- •22.3.4.4 Salvage Procedures
- •References
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.2 Epidemiology
- •23.3 Pathophysiology
- •23.4 Etiology
- •23.6 Diagnosis
- •23.6.1 Lab Test
- •23.6.2 Imaging
- •23.6.3 Cultures
- •23.7 Risk Factors
- •23.8 Surgical Treatment
- •23.8.2 One-Stage Revision Surgery
- •23.8.3 Two-Stage Revision Surgery
- •23.9 Conclusions
- •References
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2 Knee
- •24.2.1 Overview
- •24.2.3 Static Spacers
- •24.2.4 Static Versus Articulating Spacers
- •24.2.5 Distal Femoral or Proximal Tibial Replacement Infection
- •24.2.6 Stage 1 Arthrodesis Spacers
- •24.2.7 Articulating DFR/PTR Spacers
- •24.3 Hip
- •24.3.1 Static Spacers
- •24.3.2 Articulating Spacers
- •References
- •25: Native Hip Joint Infection
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2.1 Epidemiology
- •25.2.2 Etiology
- •25.2.3 Clinical Presentation
- •25.2.4 Diagnosis
- •25.2.6 Treatment
- •25.3 Infection Following Hip Preservation Surgery
- •25.3.1 Hip Arthroscopy
- •25.3.1.1 Epidemiology
- •25.3.1.2 Diagnosis
- •25.3.1.4 Treatment
- •25.3.2 Periacetabular Osteotomy
- •25.3.2.1 Epidemiology
- •25.3.2.2 Diagnosis
- •25.3.2.4 Treatment
- •25.3.3 Surgical Hip Dislocation
- •25.3.3.1 Epidemiology
- •25.4.1 Epidemiology
- •25.4.2 Diagnosis
- •25.4.3 Treatment
- •References
- •26: Infective Complications After Trauma Surgeries
- •26.1 Introduction
- •26.3 Epidemiology
- •26.4 Risk Factors
- •26.5 Pathogenesis
- •26.8 Treatment
- •26.8.1 Radical Debridement
- •26.8.2 Implant Handling
- •26.9 Local Antimicrobial Therapy
- •26.9.1.1 Ilizarov Technique
- •26.9.1.2 The Masquelet Technique
- •26.9.1.4 3D Printing
- •26.12.1 Pre-operative Measures
- •26.12.1.1 Skin Preparation Solutions
- •26.12.1.2 Skin Hair Management
- •26.12.2 Peri-operative Management
- •26.12.2.1 Drapes
- •26.12.2.2 Double Gloving
- •26.12.2.3 Antibiotics Coated Implants
- •References
- •27: Infective Complications After Open Fractures
- •27.1 Introduction
- •27.2 Epidemiology
- •27.3 Pathophysiology
- •27.4 Risk Factors
- •27.5.1 Laboratory Examination
- •27.5.2 Imaging Procedures
- •27.6 Nuclear Imaging
- •27.7 Microbiology
- •27.8 Molecular Technologies
- •27.9 Histopathology
- •Irrigation
- •27.10.1.2 Appropriate Intravenous Antibiotics
- •Timing
- •Local Antibiotics
- •27.10.1.3 Meticulous Injury Zone Excision (Debridement)
- •Irrigation
- •27.10.1.4 Fracture Stabilization
- •27.10.1.5 Second Look
- •27.10.1.6 Soft Tissue Closure
- •27.10.2.1 Advantages
- •References
- •28.1 Introduction
- •References
- •29: Infective Complications After Spinal Instrumentation
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.4 Diagnosis
- •29.5 Treatment
- •29.7 Conclusions
- •References

29 Infective Complications After Spinal Instrumentation
417
infection and even guide a puncture of it.
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide the best data for
diagnosis and should be acquired with the use of
an intravenous contrast medium if possible
[32–35]. CT scans can show changes in the vertebrae, bone lysis, and even uid collection. Also,
CT can be used to guide biopsy. MRI is essential,
in particular, if a discitis or epidural abscess are
suspected. Discitis diagnosis is suggested by a
high-intensity signal in the disc and the adjacent
vertebral bodies on T2 sequences with close-by
uid collection. Elements suggesting infection of
instrumentation at the MRI are enhanced highintensity T2 signal on soft tissue or ringed
enhancement of uid collection after gadolinium
injection.
Instrumentation can complicate the radiographic examination due to the presence of artifacts. Nowadays is possible to obtain sequences
with reduced artifacts software. The choice
between CT and MRI is made considering the
presence or not of instrumentation and the type of
infection suspected, and can help to determine
the extension of the infection. One of the most
critical steps when diagnosing an SSI is to determine the specic regions of the spine involved. It
is essential to rule out medullary involvement,
such as meningitis. Additionally, if instrumentation is present, assessing the stability of the
implant is crucial.
29.5 Treatment
After diagnosis, it is essential to begin treatment
of the infection promptly, as spinal surgical site
infections (SSIs) can be challenging to eradicate.
These infections typically require a multidisciplinary approach with long-term antibiotic therapy and multiple meticulous surgical sessions for
debridement [36–38]. The causative bacteria
must be identied through blood cultures or cultures obtained from biopsy samples or surgical
debridement. After the samples are taken a broadspectrum antibiotic therapy should always be
started, to be switched to a more specic one
after the pathogenic agent is identied. The infec-
tious disease specialist should always be
addressed in those parts of the treatment [39–41].
In extremely supercial SSI, limited just to the
suture or skin incision, local treatment associated
with antibiotic therapy can be enough. However,
those cases are quite rare. In the majority of cases
SSI, both supercial or deep, can be quite difcult to eradicate and can make the surgeon face
difcult decisions.
For early post-operative infections where spinal instrumentation is present, the hardware is
maintained in order to prevent spinal instability;
every loose bone graft should be carefully
removed, keeping only one integrated. If there
are signs of mobility in the implants they should
be removed and replaced with new instrumentation [42–46]. For late post-operative infections
involving spinal instrumentation where solid
bone graft fusion has occurred, hardware removal
is highly recommended. This action helps prevent pathogens from forming a glycocalyx,
which contributes to antibiotic resistance.
Furthermore, removing the hardware allows for
more thorough debridement of any infected tissue. Abbey etal. [47] developed a treatment algorithm, where they suggest removing the
implantation only when debridement and long
period antibiotics have failed. Picada etal. [48]
proposed that instrumentation removal is not necessary in acute infections. The wound is closed
on an aspiration drain. It is advised to perform a
second look 48 to 72hours after the initial surgery if there is a severe infection [49–51].
The efcacy of treatment is monitored with
clinical monitoring and periodic blood exams.
There is still no clear consensus on the duration
of the antibiotic regimen, but usually, long-term
IV antibiotics are followed by oral suppressive
antibiotics [4, 6, 46, 52–54].
29.6 Prevention ofPostoperative
Infections
Prevention of SSI should focus on the changeable
factors listed previously. The sterile technique in
the operating room is of course paramount and
should always be as accurate as possible. As

418
A. Angelini et al.
described by other authors, to cause an infection,
bacteria must be present in signicant quantity
[20, 55–56]. The surgeon should always investigate and rule out the presence of any kind of
infectious disease (urinary tract, pulmonary system) before performing surgery, and treat them as
a priority [57]. As stated before, the risk of postoperative infection is highly dependent on the
type of surgery performed; therefore, the surgeon
should always try to prioritize less invasive methods when possible.
29.7 Conclusions
SSI after spine surgery is a challenging problem
with a major toll on the patient, the surgeon, and
the healthcare national system. Infection is a
major complication both in short and long term
due to being challenging to diagnose, and even
more to treat. It often requires prolonged medical
therapy and sometimes more than one surgical
debridement. Many factors play a role in determining the risk of SSI, both changeable or
unchangeable; the surgeon should look to minimize the risk of postoperative infection by taking
action on the changeable elements. A strict follow- up in the post-operative short and long time
period is mandatory. SSI should be investigated
every time there is an anomalous postoperative
course, using blood exams and radiological
exams; an early diagnosis is the key to success.
Once diagnosed, a treatment strategy can be
dened. It is advised to obtain blood cultures and
local tissue samplings to identify the pathogenic
agent responsible for the infection; broadspectrum IV antibiotics are mandatory until
results are obtained, and it is possible to switch to
a more specic antibiotic. Treatment can change
based on the patient’s clinical history, the site of
infection (supercial or deep), the postoperative
infection timing (early or late), and the type of
surgery (presence or absence of spine implant),
but it is usually based on long-term antibiotic and
local surgical debridement. Implant removal is
usually avoided but can be necessary in difcult
cases when neurological symptoms are present.
Declarations Author Contributions: Conceptualization, project administration: AA, PR; data curation and formal analysis: AA, RB; supervision: AA, PR;
writing-original draft: GB; writing-review and editing:
AA, PR; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: There was no external funding source in
support of this study.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not
applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Written informed
consent was obtained from patients at the time of admission to our Institute. However, all pictures have been
reported anonymized.
Consent for Publication (Include Appropriate
Statements)
We conrm that this paper, including related data, gures, and tables, has not been published previously, it is
not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and, if
accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same
form, in English or in any other language, without the
written consent of the publisher.
Conicts of Interest/Competing Interests (Include
Appropriate Disclosures)
Ruggieri P is a consultant for Stryker and Exactech
(not relevant to the present manuscript). The other authors
declare that there are no relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conict of interest with the
present manuscript.
Availability of Data and Material (Data
Transparency)
Manuscript data are embedded in the text and fully
available on specic request.
References
1. Beiner JM, Grauer J, Kwon BK, Vaccaro
AR. Postoperative wound infections of the spine.
Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15(3) https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/15347232/
2. Zimmerli W.Clinical practice. Vertebral osteomyelitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1022–9.
3. Pola E, Logroscino C, Gentiempo M, Colangelo D,
Mazzotta V, Meco E, etal. Medical and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med
Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(Suppl 2):35–49.
4. Brown EM, Pople IK, De Louvois J, Hedges A,
Bayston R, Eisenstein SM, et al. Spine update:
prevention of postoperative infection in patients
undergoing spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2004;29(8):938–45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/15083000/
5. Tsantes AG, Papadopoulos DV, Vrioni G, Sioutis S,
Sapkas G, Benzakour A, Benzakour T, Angelini A,
Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF.World association against
infection in orthopedics and trauma W A I O T study
group on bone and joint infection denitions. Spinal

29 Infective Complications After Spinal Instrumentation
419
Infect Update Microorg. 2020;8(4):476. https://doi.
org/10.3390/microorganisms8040476.
6. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson
JR. Salvage of instrumental lumbar fusions complicated by surgical wound infection. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1996 Sep 15 [cited 2024 Apr
2];21(18):2163–9. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8893444/
7. Rechtine GR, Bono PL, Cahill D, Bolesta MJ,
Chrin AM. Postoperative wound infection after
instrumentation of thoracic and lumbar fractures.
J Orthop Trauma [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2024 Apr
2];15(8):566–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/11733673/
8. Attenello J, Allen RT.Postoperative spine infections.
Semin Spine Surg. 2019;31(4):176–83.
9. Pawar AY, Biswas SK.Postoperative Spine Infections.
Asian Spine J [Internet]. 2016 Feb [cited 2024 Apr
2];10(1):176–83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949475
10. Pull Ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site
infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2009 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Apr
2];34(13):1422–8. Available from: https://europepmc.
org/article/med/19478664
11. Koutsoumbelis S, Hughes AP, Girardi FP, Cammisa
FP, Finerty EA, Nguyen JT, etal. Risk factors for postoperative infection following posterior lumbar instrumented arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet].
2011 Sep 7 [cited 2024 Apr 2];93(17):1627–33.
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/21915578/
12. Klein JD, Hey LA, Yu CS, Klein BB, Coufal FJ,
Young EP, etal. Perioperative nutrition and postoperative complications in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1996 Nov 15
[cited 2024 Apr 10];21(22):2676–82. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8961455/
13. Levin R, Bono CM, Garn SR. Vertebral Discitis
and Osteomyelitis. Core Knowl Orthop Spine
[Internet]. 2004 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Apr 10];212–25.
Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/288813986_Vertebral_Discitis_and_
Osteomyelitis
14. Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S, Maltenfort MG, Deutsch
H, Vaccaro AR, et al. Obesity and spine surgery:
relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg
Spine. 2007;6(4):291–7.
15. He Z, Zhou K, Tang K, Quan Z, Liu S, Su
B. Perioperative hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor
for wound complications following posterior lumbar
interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):538.
16. Adogwa O, Martin JR, Huang K, Verla T, Fatemi P,
Thompson P, etal. Preoperative serum albumin level
as a predictor of postoperative complication after spine
fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(18):1513–9.
17. Massie JB, Heller JG, Abitbol JJ, McPherson D,
Garn SR. Postoperative posterior spinal wound
infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;284:99–108.
18. Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa J.Postoperative
spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive
index procedures. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(5):422–6.
19. Willems P.Decision making in surgical treatment of
chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic
tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion. Acta
Orthop. 2013;84(SUPPL.349):1–37.
20. Chaudhary SB, Vives MJ, Basra SK, Reiter
MF.Postoperative spinal wound infections and postprocedural diskitis. J Spinal Cord Med [Internet].
2007 [cited 2024 Apr 2];30(5):441. Available from: /
pmc/articles/PMC2141723/
21. Thalgott JS, Cotler HB, Sasso RC, LaRocca H,
Gardner V. Postoperative infections in spinal
implants. Classication and analysis--a multicenter
study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1991 [cited
2024 Apr 10];16(8):981–4. Available from: https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1948385/
22. Sasso RC, Garrido BJ. Postoperative spinal wound
infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg [Internet]. 2008
[cited 2024 Apr 2];16(6):330–7. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18524984/
23. Viola RW, King HA, Adler SM, Wilson CB.Delayed
infection after elective spinal instrumentation and
fusion. A retrospective analysis of eight cases. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1997 Oct 15 [cited 2024
Apr 10];22(20):2444–51. Available from: https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9355228/
24. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto
AJ. Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and
their surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2000;25(13):1668–79.
25. Zippelius T, Bürger J, Schömig F, Putzier M, Matziolis
G, Strube P. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of
acute postoperative spinal implant infection (Psii). J
Spine Surg. 2020;6(4):765–71.
26. Prinz V, Vajkoczy P. Surgical revision strategies for
postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII). J spine
Surg (Hong Kong) [Internet]. 2020 Dec [cited 2024
Apr 10];6(4):777–84. Available from: http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447683
27. Meyer B, Schaller K, Rohde V, Hassler W. The
C-reactive protein for detection of early infections
after lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir
(Wien) [Internet]. 1995 Sep [cited 2024 Apr
10];136(3–4):145–50. Available from: https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8748845/
28. Wang L, Yang B, Yin B, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Tang L,
etal. Clinical signicance of PCT, CRP, ESR, WBC
count as predictors in postoperative early infectious
complications with fever after posterior lumbar internal xation. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015;28(1):66–70.
29. Kalfas F, Severi P, Scudieri C.Infection with spinal
instrumentation: a 20-year, single-institution experience with review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. Asian J Neurosurg [Internet].
2019 Dec [cited 2024 Apr 10];14(4):1181–9.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/31903360

420
A. Angelini et al.
30. Kang BU, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, Choi
YG.Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: detection and management based on serial C-reactive protein measurements clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine.
2010 Aug;13(2):158–64.
31. Stambough JL, Beringer D. Postoperative wound
infections complicating adult spine surgery. J
Spinal Disord [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2024 Apr
10];5(3):277–85. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1520986/
32. Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Mian A, Gharaibeh M,
Müller B, Guermazi A.Imaging features of postoperative complications after spinal surgery and instrumentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):123–9.
33. Girão MMV, Miyahara LK, Dwan VSY, Baptista
E, Taneja AK, Gotfryd A, et al. Imaging features
of the postoperative spine: a guide to basic understanding of spine surgical procedures. Insights
Imaging [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Apr
10];14(1):1–10. Available from: https://insight-
simaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/
s13244- 023- 01447- 0
34. Ortiz AO, de Moura A, Johnson BA. Postsurgical
spine: techniques, expected imaging ndings,
and complications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR.
2018;39(6):630–50.
35. Thakkar RS, Malloy JP, Thakkar SC, Carrino JA,
Khanna AJ.Imaging the postoperative spine. Radiol
Clin North Am. 2012;50(4):731–47.
36. Horan TC, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Jarvis WR,
Edwards JR, Reid CR.Nosocomial infections in surgical patients in the United States, January 1986-June
1992. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance
(NNIS) System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
[Internet]. 1993 Feb [cited 2024 Apr 11];14(2):73–80.
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/8440883/
37. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes
RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive
care units in the United States. Crit Care Med.
1999;27(5):887–92.
38. Cunningham ME, Girardi F, Papadopoulos EC,
Cammisa FP.Spinal infections in patients with compromised immune systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res
[Internet]. 2006 [cited 2024 Apr 11];444:73–82.
Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/16523130/
39. Levi ADO, Dickman CA, Sonntag VKH.Management
of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2024 Apr
2];86(6):975–80. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9171176/
40. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Anderson PA,
McCormick P. Management of postprocedural discitis. Spine J [Internet]. 2002 Jul 8 [cited 2024 Apr
2];2(4):279–87. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/14589480/
41. Pull Ter Gunne AF, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL, Van
Laarhoven CJHM, Cohen DB.The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infec-
tions after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010
Jun 1;35(13):1323–8.
42. Lall RR, Wong AP, Lall RR, Lawton CD, Smith ZA,
Dahdaleh NS.Evidence-based management of deep
wound infection after spinal instrumentation. J Clin
Neurosci [Internet]. 2015 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Apr
11];22(2):238–42. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25308619/
43. Yin D, Liu B, Chang Y, Gu H, Zheng X.Management
of late-onset deep surgical site infection after instrumented spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2018;18(1):121.
44. Núñez-Pereira S, Pellisé F, Rodríguez-Pardo D,
Pigrau C, Bagó J, Villanueva C, etal. Implant survival
after deep infection of an instrumented spinal fusion.
Bone Joint J [Internet] 2013 [cited 2024 Apr 11];95B(8):1121–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/23908430/
45. Chen SH, Lee CH, Huang KC, Hsieh PH, Tsai
SY.Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment
outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):561–70.
46. Hegde V, Meredith DS, Huang RC, Kepler
CK.Management of postoperative spinal infections.
World J Orthop [Internet]. 2012 Nov 11 [cited 2024
Apr 11];3(11):182. Available from: /pmc/articles/
PMC3547112/
47. Abbey DM, Turner DM, Warson JS, Wirt TC,
Scalley RD.Treatment of postoperative wound infections following spinal fusion with instrumentation.
J Spinal Disord [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2024 Apr
12];8(4):278–83. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8547767/
48. Picada R, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Pinto
MR, Smith MD, et al. Postoperative deep wound
infection in adults after posterior lumbosacral spine
fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management. J Spinal Disord [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2024 Apr
12];13(1):42–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/10710149/
49. Clark CE, Shufebarger HL.Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1999 Sep 15 [cited 2024 Apr
12];24(18):1909–12. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10515015/
50. Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K.Late implant infections
caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2005 Oct [cited 2024 Apr
12];14(8):783–8. Available from: https://pubmed.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15841406/
51. Richards BS, Emara KM. Delayed infections after
posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic
scoliosis: Revisited. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet].
2001 Sep 15 [cited 2024 Apr 12];26(18):1990–6.
Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/11800492_Delayed_Infections_After_
Posterior_TSRH_Spinal_Instrumentation_for_
Idiopathic_Scoliosis
52. Atesok K, Vaccaro A, Stippler M, Striano BM, Carr
M, Heffernan M, et al. Fate of hardware in spinal
Infections. Surg Infect. 2020;21(5):404–10.

29 Infective Complications After Spinal Instrumentation
421
53. Chahoud J, Kanafani Z, Kanj SS.Surgical site infections following spine surgery: eliminating the controversies in the diagnosis. Front Med [Internet].
2014 [cited 2024 Apr 10];1(MAR):7. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705620
54. Thavarajasingam SG, Vemulapalli KV, Vishnu
KS, Ponniah HS, Vogel ASM, Vardanyan R, et al.
Conservative versus early surgical treatment in
the management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep.
2023;13(1):15647.
55. Gelalis ID, Arnaoutoglou CM, Politis AN, Batzaleksis
NA, Katonis PG, Xenakis TA.Bacterial wound contamination during simple and complex spinal procedures. A prospective clinical study. Spine J [Internet].
2011 [cited 2024 Apr 12];11(11):1042–8. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22122837/
56. Cruse PJE, Foord R.A ve-year prospective study of
23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg [Internet]. 1973
[cited 2024 Apr 12];107(2):206–10. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4719566/
57. Dipaola CP, Saravanja DD, Boriani L, Zhang H, Boyd
MC, Kwon BK, etal. Postoperative infection treatment score for the spine (PITSS): construction and
validation of a predictive model to dene need for
single versus multiple irrigation and debridement for
spinal surgical site infection. Spine J [Internet]. 2012
[cited 2024 Apr 12];12(3):218–30. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22386957/
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
