Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4466_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
18
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. Türe et al.
membrane—into the region of the middle ear. It may be present from birth or acquired later. It generally causes conductive hearing loss through direct impinge­ment on the ossicles or by eroding the ossicles. Cholesteatoma occurs as a primary condition after birth and begins with tympanic membrane retraction. This is typi­cally the result of eustachian tube malfunction. Sinus cholesteatoma affects the pos­terior aspect of the pars tensa whilst the more common attic cholesteatoma affects the pars accida. The portion of the tympanic membrane where retraction occurs forms a pocket with a lining composed of normal stratied squamous epithelium and lled with keratin sloughed by desquamated cells. Secondary acquired choles­teatoma occurs following the perforation of the tympanic membrane if the epithe­lium regrows in the wrong direction (i.e. into the middle ear, rather than closing off the defect) [1].
The main objective of operative intervention is to clean and dry the ear, leaving it safe from further disease arising from recurrence or as a result of parts of the cholesteatoma remaining in situ. The condition recurs more commonly in paediatric than adult cases, which may be due to the fact the eustachian tubes are still develop­ing in a child. The other objective is to remedy any CHL resulting from the condi­tion. To achieve this, the reconstruction of the ossicles may be needed, either at the time of cholesteatoma removal or subsequently. A conventional hearing aid may help, as may a bone conduction device; consideration should also be given to edu­cational accommodations, including an FM system and preferential seating [1].
1.4 Conclusion
Paediatric hearing loss may be congenital or acquired, sensorineural or conductive. While sensorineural loss is more common in pure congenital hearing loss, the most common cause of hearing loss in the general paediatric population remains otitis media with effusion. Individual patient factors dictate differences in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
References
1. Dougherty W, Kesser BW.Management of conductive hearing loss in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48(6):955–74.
2. Downs MP.Relationship of pathology to function in congenital hearing loss. II.The auditory function in congenital hearing loss. Audiology. 1972;11:330–6.
3. Eisen MD, Ryugo DK.Hearing molecules: contributions from genetic deafness. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64(5):566–80.
4. Antonio SAM.Syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. In: Meyers AD, editor. Medscape. 2018.
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/856116- overview#a5. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
5. Saunders JE, Vaz S, Greinwald JH, Lai J, Morin L, Mojica K.Prevalence and etiology of hear­ing loss in rural Nicaraguan children. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(3):387–98.
6. Song J, Feng Y, Acke FR, Coucke P, Vleminckx K, Dhooge IJ.Hearing loss in Waardenburg syndrome: a systematic review. Clin Genet. 2015;89:416.
1 Pediatric Hearing Loss
https://t.me/medicina_free
7. Kofer T, Ushakov K, Avraham KB. Genetics of hearing loss: syndromic. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48(6):1041–61.
8. Usher syndrome. Genetics home reference. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/usher-
syndrome/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
9. Pendred syndrome. Genetics home reference. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/
pendred- syndrome/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
10. Jervell and Lange-Nielson syndrome. Genetics home reference. https://medlineplus.gov/
genetics/condition/alstrom- syndrome/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
11. Cockayne syndrome. Genetics home reference. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/
cockayne- syndrome/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
12. Alstrom disease. Genetics home. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/
alstrom- syndrome/.
13. Nadol JB Jr, Marshall JD, Bronson RT.Histopathology of the human inner ear in Alstrom’s syndrome. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(4):267–72.
14. Merchant SN, Burgess BJ, Adams JC, Kashtan CE, Gregory MC, Santi PA. Temporal bone histopathology in Alport syndrome. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1609–18.
15. Norrie disease. Genetics home reference. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/norrie-
disease/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022.
16. Hartel BP, van Nierop JWI, Huinck WJ, Rotteveel LJC, Mylanus EAM, Snik AF, et al. Cochlear implantation in patients with Usher Syndrome type IIa increases performance and quality of life. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(6):e120–7.
17. Bayrak F, Catli T, Atsal G, Tokat T, Olgun L.Waardenburg syndrome: an unusual indication of Cochlear implantation experienced in 11 patients. J Int Adv Otol. 2017;13(2):230–2.
18. Koyama H, Kashio A, Sakata A, et al. The hearing outcomes of Cochlear implantation in Waardenburg syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2854736.
19. Alzhrani F, Alhussini R, Hudeib R, Alkaff T, Islam T, Alsanosi A. The outcome of cochlear implantation among children with genetic syndromes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(2):365–9.
20. Davidson J, Hyde ML, Alberti PW.Epidemiologic patterns in childhood hearing loss: a review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1989;17:239–66.
21. Gravel JS, Wallace IF.Effects of otitis media with effusion on hearing in the rst 3 years of life. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:631–44.
22. Khodaverdi M, Jorgensen G, Lange T, etal. Hearing 25 years after surgical treatment of otitis media with effusion in early childhood. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:241–7.
23. Roberts J, Hunter L, Gravel J, etal. Otitis media, hearing loss, and language learning: contro­versies and current research. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004;25:110–22.
24. Wallace IF, Gravel JS, McCarton CM, etal. Otitis media and language development at 1 year of age. J Speech Hear Disord. 1988;53:245–51.
25. Bellucci RJ.Congenital aural malformations: diagnosis and treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1981;14:95–124.
26. Dostal A, Nemeckova J, Gaillyova R, et. al. Identication of 2.3-Mb gene locus for congenital aural atresia in 18q22.3 deletion: a case report analyzed by comparative genomic hybridiza­tion. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:427–32.
27. Casselbrant ML.Epidemiology of otitis media in infants and preschool children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:S10–1.
28. Broen PA, Moller KT, Carlstrom J, et. al. Comparison of the hearing histories of children with and without cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:127–33.
29. Sheahan P, Blayney AW, Sheahan JN, et. al. Sequelae of otitis media with effusion among children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27:494–500.
30. Flynn T, Moller C, Jonsson R, etal. The high prevalence of otitis media with effusion in children with cleft lip and palate as compared to children without clefts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73:1441–6.
19
20
https://t.me/medicina_free
31. Friedman RA, Kesser BW, Derebery JM. Surgery of ventilation and mucosal disease. In: Brackman DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA, editors. Otologic surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier;
2010. p.73–91.
32. Fiellau-Nikolajsen M.Epidemiology of secretory otitis media. A descriptive cohort study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1983;92:172–7.
33. Mehta RP, Rosowski JJ, Voss SE, et al. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27:136–43.
34. James AL, Papsin BC.Ten top considerations in pediatric tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:992–8.
35. Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, et. al. Tympanoplasty for chronic tympanic membrane perforation in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:796–804.
36. Duval M, Grimmer JF, Meier J, etal. The effect of age on pediatric tympanoplasty outcomes: a comparison of preschool and older children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:336–41.
37. Gross CW, Bassila M, Lazar RH, etal. Adipose plug myringoplasty: an alternative to formal myringoplasty techniques in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;101:617–20.
38. Saliba I, Froehlich P. Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: an ofce-based technique adapted to children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137:1203–9.
N. Türe et al.
Newborn Hearing Screening
https://t.me/medicina_free
RecepKaramert, AylaGünlemez, andStephanLang
2.1 Introduction
Congenital hearing loss (HL) is the most common congenital disability. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the estimated prevalence of disabling HL in the neonatal period is 2 per 1000 live births [1]. Hearing loss in infancy has a marked negative impact on developing communication skills and achieving good academic and social performance. Even mild losses yield delayed speech and lan­guage development [2]. Time is crucial in managing the diagnosis and rehabilitation of HL in infancy. If early access to rehabilitation is provided, infants with hearing impairment may achieve comparable speech and language development with their normal hearing peers. Such performance is less likely in infants diagnosed with HL after the rst 6months of life due to missing the critical period for the maturation of the central auditory pathway [3, 4].
2
R. Karamert (*) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye e-mail: recepkaramert@gazi.edu.tr
A. Günlemez Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye e-mail: aylagunlemez@yahoo.com
S. Lang Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany e-mail: stephan.lang@uk-essen.de
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A. E. Arısoy et al. (eds.), Hearing Loss in Congenital, Neonatal and Childhood Infections, Comprehensive ENT, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38495-0_2
21
22
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Karamert et al.
Awareness of the positive impact of early diagnosis and prompt intervention on congenital HL dates back to the 1940s [5]. But establishing the rst universal screening program took several decades because of the lack of feasible screening methods. After the introduction and widespread use of objective physiologic screen­ing tests like automated otoacoustic emissions (A-OAEs) and automated auditory brainstem response (A-ABR), universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) pro­grams gradually spread worldwide [68]. Newborn hearing screening has provided a denite advantage in detecting HL compared to previous methods, such as behav­ioral or risk-targeted screening [911].
The mean time interval for the diagnosis of congenital HL is 4.6months, and the mean time interval for the rst intervention is 6.7months in very highly developed countries for infants enrolled in an NHS program. On the contrary, the mean time intervals for diagnosis and rst intervention are 34.9months and 36.7 months in unscreened infants [11]. As a consequence, NHS has become a routine of the national healthcare system in many countries in the new millennium, but overall global access to NHS is still limited. A recent survey showed that 38% of newborns are born in countries with less than 1% NHS coverage [12].
Screening is the initial effort for the early diagnosis and remediation of con­genital HL.Further steps require strong participation of the families and interdis­ciplinary collaboration among medical professionals like otorhinolaryngologists, audiologists, and pediatricians. According to Holte etal. [13], only one-third of the infants who failed the initial screening receive a timely diagnosis and enroll in an early intervention program. Therefore, the NHS system should be family-cen­tered to avoid follow-up loss and encourage the family members to maintain the diagnostic and remediation procedure. It should be emphasized that passing the screening tests does not mean that the hearing threshold of the infant is within normal limits.
Current audiologic screening tests may miss mild (thresholds under approxi­mately 35–40 deciBel [dB]) or neural HL, and progressive or delayed-onset HLs are still cause for concern, particularly in infants who have specic risk factors [14]. As the incidence of disabling HL in school-age is twice as high as in the neonatal period, ongoing surveillance of auditory perception and communication skills should be mandatory in all children [15]. Risk factors for progressive or delayed- onset HL are listed in Table2.1 [14, 1618]. Infants who meet any high­risk criterion must receive a meticulous audiologic evaluation in the rst 9months of age [14].
2 Newborn Hearing Screening
https://t.me/medicina_free
23
Table 2.1 Risk factors for progressive or delayed-onset hearing loss
Perinatal
1. Family history of deafness with onset in childhood
2. The neonatal intensive care unit stay longer than 5days
3. Mechanical ventilation
4. Hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion
5. Perinatal asphyxia and/or hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy
6. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
7. In-utero infections: Cytomegalovirus, rubella, toxoplasmosis, syphilis, herpes, human immunodeciency virus, Zika virus
8. Craniofacial and physical conditions related to hearing loss
9. Very low birth weight (<1500g)
10. Maternal substance use disorder
11. Syndromes related to hearing loss
Perinatal or Postnatal
1. Ototoxic medications: aminoglycosides, diuretics
2. Meningitis or encephalitis
3. Head trauma
4. Suspicion of hearing loss and related abnormalities noticed by family or caregiver
a
Adapted and modied from Ref. [14, 1618]
a
2.2 Etiology
2.2.1 Prenatal Period
2.2.1.1 Genetic Factors
Hearing loss is genetic in origin in more than 50% of neonates [19]. Hereditary HL may accompany other disorders like visual impairment, endocrinologic and neuro­logic pathologies as a part of a syndrome, or present as isolated defects. More than 250 genes are associated with hereditary HL [1]. Inheritance of the genetic HL may be in autosomal recessive (AR), autosomal dominant (AD), X-linked (XL), or mito­chondrial manner.
Consanguineous marriages increase the risk of congenital diseases, as well as HL [20], and linguistic homogamy (intermarriage between deaf individuals) has an essential role in the increased prevalence of recessive mutations in connexin 26 genes [21]. Genetic counseling and testing are recommended for all infants with HL [22].
Syndromic Hearing Loss
Over 400 identied syndromes exist associated with HL [23]. Of these, Pendred syndrome, related to the solute carrier family 26 member 4 (SLC26A4) gene muta­tions in both alleles and inherited in an AR manner, with a due of 10% seems to be the most common reason for syndromic HL [6, 24, 25]. The SLC26A4 gene pro­vides instructions for making a protein called pendrin which transports negatively charged particles (ions), including chloride, iodide, and bicarbonate, across cell
24
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Karamert et al.
membranes. Pendrin is produced in several organs and tissues, particularly the thy­roid gland and inner ear.
Pendred syndrome is characterized by goiter, sensorineural HL (SNHL), and an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). Goiter may not be apparent until adolescence, and HL may be late-onset. Thus, the diagnosis of Pendred syndrome may be delayed. There appears to be a relationship between the most common inner ear malformation EVA and SLC26A4 mutation [24]. Apart from Pendred syndrome, 61% of nonsyndromic patients with EVA also carry a heterozygous SLC26A4 mutation [25].
Usher syndrome is characterized by retinitis pigmentosa, SNHL, and in some forms, vestibular symptoms. Usher syndrome is the most common cause of deaf­ness and blindness combination. Impairment in hearing and visual functions yields specic limitations in communication skills, so early intervention for HL is critical to maintain auditory perception and speech and language development.
Biotinidase deciency is one of the preventable causes of HL.Although it is a rare, about 1/60,000, metabolic disease in the Western population, the incidence may be as high as about 1/7000in countries such as Turkey and Brazil [6, 26, 27]. When biotinidase deciency is diagnosed in the neonatal period, it is possible to prevent HL with biotin supplements [27]. Neonatal biotinidase activity screening is routine in many countries’ newborn screening programs.
Some of the most common syndromes associated with deafness are summarized in Table2.2 [6, 22, 23].
Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss
Nonsyndromic HL constitutes the vast majority (80%) of the genetic HLs and can be caused by mutations in nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Inheritance is mostly (80%) in an AR manner. Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic HL inherited from normal-hearing parents is the most common (75–80%) scenario among congenital genetic HLs [19]. The risk is even higher in consanguineous marriages and assorta­tive matings among the deaf population [28].
Gap junction protein beta-2 (GJB2) gene mutations are the most common cause of nonsyndromic deafness and account for about 30–50% of all cases [29]. More than 100 distinct mutations affect the GJB2 gene, but 35delG consists of about 70% of all mutations [30]. The gap junction protein beta-2 gene encodes a transmem­brane protein, connexin 26, expressed widely in stria vascularis and the basement membrane of the cochlea. Connexin 26 protein is essential in potassium (K+) ion homeostasis and maintaining the high endocochlear potential necessary for normal inner ear function [31]. The pathology in connexin 26-related deafness is limited to cochlear hair cell damage, and higher brain functions are expected to be normal, unlike in many connexin 26 unrelated etiologies. Histopathologic evaluations revealed normal neural infrastructure and spiral ganglion cell population despite the severe degeneration of sensory cells in connexin 26-related deafness [32]. These make GJB2-related deaf children excellent candidates for cochlear implantation, as cochlear implants bypass the cochlear hair cells and directly stimulate the spiral ganglion cells [33].
2 Newborn Hearing Screening
https://t.me/medicina_free
25
Table 2.2 Summary of features, type of inheritance and incidence of some of the most common syndromic hearing loss
Syndrome Pendred
syndrome Usher syndrome SNHL, vestibular symptoms, retinal
Waardenburg syndrome
Branchio-oto­renal syndrome
Alport’s syndrome
X-linked deafness
Treacher Collins syndrome
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome
Biotinidase deciency
AR autosomal recessive, AD autosomal dominant, EVA enlarged vestibular aqueduct, SNHL senso­rineural hearing loss, XL X-linked
a
Adapted and modied from Ref. [6, 22, 23]
a
Characteristic features Inheritance
EVA and SNHL, vestibular symptoms, and goiter
dystrophy, hematuria, and renal failure Hearing loss, hypopigmentation in the
eye, skin, or hair, white forelock, heterochromia iridis, and dystopia cantorum
Hearing loss, branchial arch malformations (branchial stula, external auditory canal, and auricula malformations, pre-auricular pits), and renal malformations
SNHL, hematuria, progressive renal failure, and ocular abnormalities
Characteristic with incomplete partition type 3 malformation of the cochlea (bulbous internal auditory canal, absent modiolus). Progressive hearing loss
Midface hypoplasia, microtia, cleft palate, and conductive type hearing loss
SNHL, prolonged QT interval, syncopal attacks, and sudden death
Neurologic and cutaneous abnormalities: SNHL, seizures, ataxia, hypotonia, visual problems, and alopecia
AR 4–10%
AR 4–6%
AD/AR 1–4%
AD 2%
XL/AR 1%
XL >1%
AD 1%
AR 0.25–0.5%
AR 1/7000–
Incidence (among deaf people)
1/60,000in the general population
a
Sensorineural HL is common in mitochondrial diseases. Mitochondrial HL may occur in isolation or as a component of a syndrome. Pathogenic mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) is transmitted by maternal inheritance. The onset of mtDNA-related SNHL tends to be in infancy or early life, with a gradual progres­sion. Hearing loss is exclusively symmetrical, sensorineural, and progressive and primarily affects the higher frequencies in mitochondrial disease. The penetration of the mutation may vary, and the onset and severity of the HL may differ even in fam­ily members carrying the same genetic variations. Some pathogenetic variants in mtDNA, such as A1555G, are associated with a predisposition to aminoglycoside ototoxicity [34, 35].
26
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Karamert et al.
2.2.1.2 Intrauterine Infections
Although intrauterine infections of viral, protozoal, and bacterial pathogens can cause congenital HL, viral infections are incomparably more common and solely responsible for about 40% of nongenetic congenital HL. Hearing loss related to intrauterine infections is sensorineural, and severity and onset characteristics may vary depending on the infectious agent [36]. Common infectious causes of congeni­tal HL are cytomegalovirus (CMV), rubella, toxoplasmosis, syphilis, herpes sim­plex virus type 1 and 2 (HSV-1, HSV-2), Zika virus, human immunodeciency virus (HIV), and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV).
Congenital CMV infection (cCMVI) is the most common congenital infection and the most common cause of congenital infection-related HL.The prevalence of cCMVI is 0.4–2.3% in newborns and 6–7% among individuals with congenital HL [37]. About 10–15% of infants with cCMVI are diagnosed with unilateral or bilat­eral SNHL; of these, 3–5% have bilateral moderate to profound HL [38, 39]. Congenital CMVI may cause delayed-onset HL; up to 43% of newborns with cCMVI pass the hearing screening but develop SNHL in the following period [37]. Close follow-up and audiologic monitoring are required in all infants with cCMVI to avoid delayed diagnosis and intervention of HL.
Rubella is a common cause of congenital infections. Although rubella was eradicated in many high-income countries with large-scale immunization, it still is an important cause of intrauterine infections in low- and middle-income coun­tries. Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) is a devastating intrauterine infection characterized by HL, growth retardation, and neurologic, visual, and cardiac defects. Rubella infection within the rst trimester results in CRS in 90% of new­borns [40]. The prevalence of HL in congenital rubella infection is as high as 19% [36]. As nonimmune pregnant women constitute a signicant risk for developing CRS, maternal vaccination is critical to avoid this devastating infection’s consequences.
Congenital toxoplasmosis is another tragic intrauterine infection associated with HL. Fetal transmission generally occurs in primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy [41]. As most infections are asymptomatic, the screening of Toxoplasma-specic antibodies in all pregnant women is recommended [41, 42].
Congenital syphilis was a common cause of congenital HL.It still is a cause of congenital HL in low- and middle-income countries. However, after the introduc­tion of penicillin and prevention and treatment programs, congenital syphilis preva­lence decreased gradually for decades and is a very exceptional entity today in high-income countries [43]. Hearing loss in congenital syphilis is progressive and delayed-onset in most affected children. Hearing tests are usually normal in the neonatal period, and screening tests may be ineffective [44].
Congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) is associated with numerous congenital mal­formations, including microcephaly. Adverse outcomes of CZS were reported as much as 46% [45]. Current literature supports a possible association between CZS and HL, and prompt audiologic evaluation of infected newborns is recom­mended [46].
2 Newborn Hearing Screening
https://t.me/medicina_free
27
2.2.2 Perinatal Period
2.2.2.1 Perinatal Asphyxia
Perinatal asphyxia can trigger neuronal injury that may result in hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). The prevalence of perinatal asphyxia is about 2%, and although most recover entirely, 0.16% of newborns develop HIE [47]. Hypoxic– ischemic injuries frequently cause sensory impairments, including HL, due to the permanent disruption of hair cells in the organ of the Corti. Hearing loss following HIE is reported as high as 17.1% in patients with accompanying neurologic impair­ments [48].
2.2.2.2 Hyperbilirubinemia
The prevalence of neonatal jaundice in term and late preterm newborns is 84% [49]. It is mostly transient, and long-term complications are rare. But neurologic decits like HL may occur in some infants, particularly those with bilirubin levels over 20mg/dL.Hearing loss is commonly caused by damage to the auditory nerve or brainstem and presents as auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Hearing loss is more common in premature infants as they are more susceptible to bilirubin toxicity [50].
2.2.2.3 Low Birth Weight
As access to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has become widespread, survival rates of very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500g) infants have substantially increased. The incidence of HL is signicantly higher in VLBW infants. There may be no direct relationship between birth weight and HL.Still, VLBW is associated with various risk factors, such as hyperbilirubinemia, the requirement for ototoxic medi­cations, and hypoxia that may synergistically impair hearing [16].
2.2.2.4 Perinatal Infections
The most common cause of acquired HL in infancy and early childhood is bacterial meningitis which accounts for about 6% of all SNHLs [51]. Most cases are under 2years of age and have bilateral HL [52]. Bacterial meningitis results in SNHL in up to 30% of pediatric patients [53]. The pathogenesis of SNHL in bacterial meningitis depends on suppurative labyrinthitis due to bacterial infection spread from the sub­arachnoid space to the cochlea through the cochlear aqueduct. The inammatory pro­cess in the inner ear frequently leads to brosis and subsequent ossication of the perilymphatic spaces, causing the destruction of the sensory hairy cells. The brosis and ossication may occur as early as weeks after the onset of meningitis [54]. Occlusion of the cochlear duct by brous tissue and subsequent ossication, and laby­rinthitis ossicans, consists of an obstacle for cochlear implantation in case of severe SNHL. Therefore, severe hearing impairment after meningitis is an emergency for cochlear implantation. Patients with residual hearing compensable with conventional hearing aids should be followed up closely with audiologic and radiologic monitoring. Care must be taken to avoid missing progressive HL and cochlear ossication, which will make the salvage therapy, and cochlear implantation much more complicated [55].