Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4466_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
44 Мб
Скачать
19 Mastoiditis andHearing Loss inChildren
https://t.me/medicina_free
257
19.7.1.2 Empirical Treatment
When deciding on the initial antibiotic agent and before culture results are known, bear in mind if the child has been subject to recurrence in attacks of AOM and what agents have been administered to the patient recently [3].
In a case where AOM is not recurrent and no antimicrobial therapy has been administered within the preceding 6 months, a reasonable option is vancomycin alone, given intravenously at a dose of 15mgkg−1 at 6-h intervals, the maximum single dose not to exceed 1 g. A second option is linezolid, also intravenously admin­istered, at a dose of 10mgkg−1 8-h if the children is under the age of 12years, or 12-h for older children. The linezolid dose given each time must not exceed 600mg. These regimes may be changed when culture is complete. The pathogens most likely to be responsible are S. pneumoniae (some strains of which are insensitive to multiple agents), S. pyogenes and S. aureus (which also may be insensitive to methicillin) [3].
In paediatric patients where episodes of AOM have been recurrent or an antimi­crobial agent has been prescribed within the preceding 6 months, it is recommended to use agents in combination. One rational empirical approach is combining either vancomycin or linezolid with an anti-pseudomonal agent initially, then adjusting treatment if required once the results of microbiological analysis are known [3].
It may be necessary to add in further antibiotics in cases where a complication is present, such as a cerebral abscess, or where the initial gram staining points towards a less usual pathogen [3].
Treatment According to Pathogen. Once the microbiological analysis has shown the pathogen responsible and its sensitivity, the choice of antibiotic may need to be revised. Frequently occurring pathogens include the following [3]:
S. pneumoniae
S. pyogenes
S. aureus (including strains insensitive to methicillin)
It is usually necessary in treating a patient with acute mastoiditis to drain any purulent discharge from the middle ear space and mastoid cells. Antibiotic treat­ment is generally inadequate as monotherapy, especially as the condition develops, since there may be problems delivering pharmaceutical agents at the necessary con­centration within the osseous tissues [22]. Draining the lesion also helps to arrest further pathological development and may stop the condition becoming compli­cated [23]. Whilst it has been reported in the literature that acute mastoiditis responded fully to antibiotics without the need to undertake tympanocentesis or myringotomy [24], it is generally advisable to obtain a sample of uid from the middle ear if antibiotic treatment is to avoid being blind.
There is considerable variation between clinics in terms of the optimal approach used to drain the lesion. Potential methods available are tympanocentesis, myrin­gotomy, myringotomy with grommet insertion or mastoidectomy. The approach taken may depend on what stage mastoiditis has reached (e.g. with periosteal involvement or coalescent) and whether a complication is present and of what kind [4, 25, 26].
258
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Karaogullarindan et al.
19.7.1.3 Mastoidectomy
This operation results in excision of the cortical bone of the mastoid and removal of the mastoid air spaces. There are two types. The simple type (which may be referred to as cortical, complete or canal-wall-up) involves preservation of the posterior por­tion of the external meatus. The radical procedure (which may be termed canal­wall- down) does not permit preservation of the posterior section of the meatus.
The simple procedure aims to clear away any infected material from the mastoid, allowing opening of the antral entrance and letting any remaining uid drain to the outside [4]. The radical procedure is conned to cases where a simple mastoidec­tomy fails to relieve the problem and the patient still has an ear discharge and otalgia [4].
19.7.2 Chronic Mastoiditis
The approach to treating chronic mastoiditis resembles that taken in chronic sup­purative middle ear infections, namely application of antibiotics topically. In cases of treatment failure, the ear needs to be regularly cleaned and antibiotics adminis­tered systemically. The initial agent given is one that targets both aerobes and anaer­obes. More than 50% of Gram-negative anaerobes (such as pigment-bearing Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Bacteroides and Fusobacterium species) are no longer penicillin-sensitive, since they express a beta-lactamase. The agents that are still effective against anaerobes are clindamycin, cefoxitin, metronidazole, chloram­phenicol, co-amoxiclav and piperacillin-tazobactam [2].
The surgical options encompass mastoidectomy, grommet insertion or tympano­plasty, depending on the specic indication. An important factor to consider is whether there is osteitis or periosteitis present. Any child with a chronic middle ear infection needs referral to an ENT specialist.
19.8 Complications
The following complications may arise from extracranial extension of mastoid inammation [27]
• Seventh cranial nerve palsy.
• Auditory impairment, which may be of conductive or sensorineural type.
• Abscess formation within the subperiosteum.
• Osteomyelitis of the cranium, or an erosive process of the bone.
• Formation of a Bezold abscess. This lesion is located deeply within the cervical
soft tissues.
• Inammation of the labyrinth.
• Post-anginal septicaemia.
• Gradenigo syndrome, which consists of the following three features: sixth cra-
nial nerve palsy, deep prosopalgia originating from the fth cranial nerve and
suppurative otitis media. Gradenigo syndrome arises because of inammation of
the petrous temporal bone.
19 Mastoiditis andHearing Loss inChildren
https://t.me/medicina_free
259
The following complications may arise from intracranial extension of mastoid inammation
• Extension of infection to the meninges. Abscess formation within the epidural
space, the temporal lobe or elsewhere in the brain. Empyema formation under
the dura mater. Abscess formation in the subperiosteum.
• Thrombus formation within the sinuses of the dura mater.
References
1. Glynn F, Osman L, Colreavy M, Rowley H, Dwyer TP, Blayney A.Acute mastoiditis in chil­dren: presentation and long term consequences. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(3):233–7.
2. Brook I.Pediatric mastoiditis. In: Steele RW, editor. Medscape; 2021. https://emedicine.med-
scape.com/article/966099- overview. Accessed 11 Feb 2022.
3. Wald ER.Acute mastoiditis in children: treatment and prevention. In: Kaplan SL, Messner AH, Armsby C, editors. . UpToDate; 2019.
4. Bluestone CD, Klein JO. Intratemporal complications and sequelae of otitis media. In: Bluestone CD, Casselbrant ML, Stool SE, et al., editors. Pediatric otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p.687.
5. Holt GR, Gates GA.Masked mastoiditis. Laryngoscope. 1983;93:1034.
6. Leibovitz E.Complicated otitis media and its implications. Vaccine. 2008;26(Suppl 7):G16–9.
7. Jung TT, Alper CM, Hellstrom SO, Hunter LL, Casselbrant ML, Groth A, et al. Panel 8: Complications and sequelae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(4 Suppl):E122–43.
8. Laulajainen-Hongisto A, Saat R, Lempinen L, Aarnisalo AA, Jero J. Children hospitalized due to acute otitis media: how does this condition differ from acute mastoiditis? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(9):1429–35.
9. Kaplan SL, Mason EO, Wald ER, et al. Pneumococcal mastoiditis in children. Pediatrics. 2000;106(4):695–9.
10. Gorphe P, de Barros A, Choussy O, Dehesdin D, Marie JP.Acute mastoiditis in children: 10 years experience in a French tertiary university referral center. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(2):455–60.
11. Brook I.Fusobacterial infections in children. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2013;15(3):288–94.
12. Brook I.Role of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in head and neck infections. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(12):1301–7.
13. Brook I. The role of anaerobic bacteria in acute and chronic mastoiditis. Anaerobe. 2005;11(5):252–7.
14. Shamriz O, Engelhard D, Temper V, Revel-Vilk S, Benenson S, Brooks R, et al. Infections caused by Fusobacterium in children: a 14-year single-center experience. Infection. 2015;43(6):663–70.
15. Yarden-Bilavsky H, Raveh E, Livni G, Scheuerman O, Amir J, Bilavsky E. Fusobacterium necrophorum mastoiditis in children—emerging pathogen in an old disease. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(1):92–6.
16. Brook I.The role of beta-lactamase-producing-bacteria in mixed infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;14(9):202.
17. Nguyen JT, Challapalli M, McElheny K, Fridirici Z. Blastomycosis presenting as isolated otitis and otomastoiditis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(3):301–2.
18. Mongkolrattanothai K, Oram R, Redleaf M, Bova J, Englund JA.Tuberculous otitis media with mastoiditis and central nervous system involvement. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(5):453–6.
19. Bal ZS, Sen S, Yildiz KB, Ciftdogan DY, Vardar F.Tuberculous otomastoiditis complicated by sinus vein thrombosis. Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16(6):608–9.
20. van den Aardweg MT, Rovers MM, de Ru JA, Albers FW, Schilder AG.A systematic review of diagnostic criteria for acute mastoiditis in children. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(6):751–7.
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
21. Vazquez E, Castellote A, Piqueras J, etal. Imaging of complications of acute mastoiditis in children. Radiographics. 2003;23(2):359–72.
22. Luntz M, Brodsky A, Nusem S, etal. Acute mastoiditis—the antibiotic era: a multicenter study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;57:1.
23. Geva A, Oestreicher-Kedem Y, Fishman G, etal. Conservative management of acute mastoid­itis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72:629.
24. Lin HW, Shargorodsky J, Gopen Q.Clinical strategies for the management of acute mastoiditis in the pediatric population. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010;49:110.
25. Zanetti D, Nassif N.Indications for surgery in acute mastoiditis and their complications in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70:1175.
26. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. (Guideline) Evidence based clinical practice guideline for medical management of acute otitis media in children 2 months to 13 years of age. 2004.
27. Fischer JB, Prout A, Blackwood RA, Warrier K.Lemierre syndrome presenting as acute mas­toiditis in a 2-year-old girl with congenital dwarsm. Infect Dis Rep. 2015;7(2):5922.
A. Karaogullarindan et al.
Labyrinthitis inChildren andHearing
https://t.me/medicina_free
Loss
MehmetErkanKaplama, NurayBayar Muluk, andMarioMilkov
20.1 Introduction
Labyrinthitis refers to inammation occurring in the labyrinth/inner ear. The clini­cal presentation involves symptoms of disordered balance and auditory impairment, which may vary in severity. It may be uni- or bilateral. Labyrinthitis may be trig­gered by bacterial or viral pathogens and occurs in the context of a local or systemic infection. Another potential cause is autoimmunity. Interruption to the blood supply of the labyrinth may cause symptoms that closely resemble labyrinthitis [1].
20.2 Aetiology
20
To appreciate the pathophysiological mechanism of labyrinthitis, it is vital to know the anatomy of the labyrinth and adjoining structures, namely the middle ear cavity, mastoid and subarachnoid space. The inner ear consists of an external bony frame­work that protects the fragile arrangement of membranes constituting the sense organs that allow for auditory perception and equilibrioception [1].
M. E. Kaplama (*) Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Private Sanmed Hospital, Sanliurfa, Türkiye e-mail: drmehmeterkan@yahoo.com
N. Bayar Muluk Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Türkiye e-mail: nbayarmuluk@yahoo.com
M. Milkov Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Varna University, Varna, Bulgaria e-mail: mario.milkov@gmail.com
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 A. E. Arısoy et al. (eds.), Hearing Loss in Congenital, Neonatal and Childhood Infections, Comprehensive ENT, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38495-0_20
261
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
The organs of perception consist of the utricle, saccule, semicircular canals and cochlea. Inammation within the labyrinth results from invasion by pathogenic microbes or mediators of inammation into the labyrinthine membranes. This then causes injury to the vestibular and auditory organs [1].
The inner ear is contained by the petrous temporal bone and lies next to the mas­toid air cells. The communication with the middle ear cavity is via the round and oval windows. The internal acoustic meatus and canaliculus provide communica­tion with the brain and the leptomeningeal space. Bacterial pathogens may invade the membranous labyrinth by this route or via a defect in the osseous labyrinth, which may have been present since birth or formed later. Viral pathogens reach the inner ear either via the bloodstream or through the canaliculus and internal acoustic meatus [1].
M. E. Kaplama et al.
20.2.1 Causative Viral andBacterial Pathogens
There is a lack of direct experimental conrmation that viruses cause labyrinthitis. Nonetheless, epidemiological data point towards several viral pathogens as likely causes of labyrinthitis. Viral labyrinthitis frequently follows an infection of the upper respiratory tract and may occur in outbreaks. On histopathological examina­tion, the axons are degenerated within the vestibular nerve, and this implies that vestibular neuritis results from a virus [2].
Bacterial pathogens implicated in cases of labyrinthitis are identical with those causing meningitis and ear infections. If cholesteatoma is present, the pathogen involved is frequently a Gram-negative bacterium [1].
There are a number of viruses that may be responsible for labyrinthitis, namely [1]
• Cytomegalovirus
• Mumps virus
• Varicella-zoster virus
• Rubeola virus
• Inuenza virus
• Parainuenza virus
• Rubella virus
• Herpes simplex virus 1
• Adenovirus
• Coxsackievirus
• Respiratory syncytial virus
There are also a number of bacteria that may be responsible for labyrinthitis, namely [1]
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Haemophilus inuenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria meningitidis
20 Labyrinthitis inChildren andHearing Loss
https://t.me/medicina_free
Streptococcus species
Staphylococcus species
Proteus species
Bacteroides species
Escherichia coli
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
263
20.3 Classification
20.3.1 Viral Labyrinthitis
Both congenital and acquired deafness may result from a viral infection. The most well-documented viruses responsible for congenital deafness are rubella and cyto­megalovirus. If deafness occurs after birth, it is typically caused by mumps or mea­sles. Viruses also appear likely to cause sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in idiopathic cases. Molecules expressed in inammation have been shown experi­mentally to feature signicantly in the pathological mechanism by which cytomega­lovirus causes deafness [3].
Herpes zoster oticus, also termed Ramsay-Hunt syndrome, is a distinctive sub­type of labyrinthitis occurring secondary to a viral infection. In this syndrome, varicella- zoster virus, which has persisted from an earlier primary episode of infec­tion, becomes active once more. It appears that the vestibulocochlear nerve is not the only region affected, since the spiral and vestibular ganglia are also affected [4]. This viral reactivation causes paralysis of facial muscles, the eruption of vesicles and, in around a quarter of cases, symptoms affecting hearing and balance [5].
20.3.1.1 Vestibular Neuritis
There are several synonyms used for vestibular neuritis, namely vestibular neuroni­tis, labyrinthitis, neurolabyrinthitis and acute peripheral vestibulopathy [6]. This condition resolves spontaneously and entirely in the majority of cases. However, patients with this condition may suffer briey from limitations caused by the unpleasant symptoms. Patients complain of vertigo, feeling they are about to vomit or actual vomiting and difculty in walking [7].
There is an overlap between the presentation of vestibular neuritis and other conditions with a graver prognosis, especially ischaemic events affecting the brain. It is vital that these more serious conditions are not misdiagnosed as vestibular neu­ritis, since failure to recognise them may lead to excessive morbidity or patient death [7].
The clinical picture of vestibular neuritis is a condition that occurs suddenly, without warning and affects the peripheral vestibular nerve. The patient suffers sud­den vertigo, which is severe and accompanied by nausea, vomiting and difculty walking without falling. Although vertigo in adults is often attributable to vestibular neuritis, this is not so for children. Patients demonstrate a preference for lying motionless on the opposite side from the lesion. Auditory impairment does not
264
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. E. Kaplama et al.
result from vestibular neuritis. The aetiology has been hypothesised to involve a post-viral inammatory response or an infection of the vestibular nerve caused by mumps, measles, Epstein-Barr virus or herpesvirus. One problem with this hypoth­esis is that under 50% of cases are found in patients where a recent infection with a virus has occurred. The duration of symptoms is between weeks and months [8].
Labyrinthitis is a subtype of vestibular neuritis, which appears as acute deafness accompanied by vertigo. The aetiology is infection affecting the inner ear due to a pathogenic virus or bacterium. Labyrinthitis may be seen in isolation or following a middle ear infection or meningitis. Auditory impairment in some cases does not recover [8].
Pathophysiology
Although vestibular neuritis is typically described as inammation, which involves the vestibular division of the vestibulocochlear nerve [6], there is little evidence available to conrm this is what actually occurs in patients. Indeed, below 50% of cases can be linked to a viral infection before symptoms began [912]. A study that used magnetic resonance imaging scans as evidence found that 20 out of 29 cases diagnosed as vestibular neuritis exhibited enhanced lesions consistent with the puta­tive pathogenetic mechanism [13].
Clinical Presentation
Symptoms of vestibular neuritis include an abruptly beginning vertigo of high severity that leaves patients unstable when walking and is accompanied by nausea and vomiting. It is an acute syndrome that occurs without warning and affects peripheral balance [7].
On physical examination, a picture of acutely disturbed balance is noted, namely [7]
• Unprovoked vestibular nystagmus that occurs to one side, in a horizontal direc-
tion, or horizontal plus rotary nystagmus. If the gaze is xed, nystagmus disap-
pears. The direction of nystagmus is not affected by where the patient is looking.
The rapid phase of nystagmus is towards the unaffected ear.
• Positivity of head impulse testing. The physician turns the head swiftly in the
direction of the affected ear, and the patient cannot keep their gaze xed on one
spot. A cases series found positivity of the test in 82% of cases [14]. Positivity of
this test correlated with symptoms that endured for longer than average. Although
positivity of the sign does correlate with vestibular neuritis, it may also occur
with other conditions affecting the central nervous system [15].
• Patients can walk, albeit they are highly unstable. Any swaying or tendency to
fall is on the side of the lesion, hence also in the direction of the rapid phase of
nystagmus [7].
• There should be no other signs or symptoms indicating a nervous system disorder.
Thus, the patient should not be dysarthric; unable to swallow; have weakness of the
limbs, perceptual decits and drooping of the face; or exhibit limb dysmetria.
Although some patients do have double vision in a vertical direction or skew devia-
tion, this nding should make the clinician suspect a cerebrovascular accident [7].
20 Labyrinthitis inChildren andHearing Loss
https://t.me/medicina_free
265
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is clinical, with no test that can rule vestibular neuritis out or in. The patient should present with features of an abrupt onset vestibular syndrome. The ndings on physical examination have been discussed in the preceding section.
Where physical examination suggests features that are not consistent with a peripheral syndrome, imaging of the central nervous system is warranted. This applies where the patient is at an elevated likelihood of suffering a cerebrovascular accident, focal neurology is present or a new onset headache occurs with vertigo [10, 16]. Thus, the diagnosis is most likely in a young individual whose examination reveals a peripheral nervous disorder, exhibits nystagmus, has no other features of a nervous system lesion, and describes vertigo that begins suddenly and persists [10].
The ideal investigation is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion weighting (DWI) or MR angiography. Diffusion-weighted MRI is able to identify infarcted brain in the posterior fossa within 24h of the triggering event. MR angi­ography is excellent for detecting vascular lesions within the posterior circulation, such as stenotic or occluded vessels. It is more than 95% sensitive and specic for this purpose [17]. Diffusion-weighted MRI may not at rst reveal a cerebrovascular accident in the brain stem or cerebellum, if it is small and the investigation may need to be performed again 3days after symptoms began, should a central lesion still seem likely. This second study should have perfusion-weighted sequences where feasible [18, 19].
If MRI is not an option (e.g. in a patient with a metal implanted device), CT may be used, with slices placed close to each other. If CT is performed within 60min of infarction, the appearances do not reveal any abnormality. If there has been bleeding into the parenchyma or a degree of swelling sufcient to cause fourth ventricular compression, this abnormality is generally visible from an early stage. In a case where a scan of the CNS is called for, if MRI will be delayed, CT imaging should be undertaken without delay [7].
Therapy
There are several therapeutic options in cases of vestibular neuritis, such as direct treatment of the disorder using steroids and antiviral medication, treatment aiming to mitigate symptoms and vestibular rehabilitation therapy. There is limited trial evidence to conrm the efcacy of such approaches in vestibular neuritis [7].
Direct Treatment of Vestibular Neuritis Steroids administered during the acute phase of labyrinthitis have proven benet in restoring peripheral balance, according to the results of a single trial. Nonetheless, several studies have since failed to rep­licate this nding. These more recent studies, however, suffered from several weak­nesses [7].
Although the evidence base does not permit a denite conclusion on the clinical efcacy of steroids in acute vestibular neuritis of presumed viral aetiology, this approach appears defensible, provided the treatment is not contraindicated. Similarly, if there is a heightened risk of side effects, withholding this treatment also seems appropriate [7].
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
Palliative Treatment It is common to employ palliative methods to lessen vertigo,
nausea and vomiting within the initial days after the onset of vestibular neuritis. Palliative agents suitable for this purpose are antiemetics and antihistamines. It is usually best not to supply oral agents, due to vomiting. Start at a minimal dose and increase until the desired effect is achieved [7].
Vestibular Rehabilitation Based on the scores used to measure symptomatic severity and functional balance in cases where peripheral damage to the vestibular system has occurred on one side, vestibular rehabilitation may be considered bene­cial [20]. There is considerable clinical experience, too, showing that this treatment results in signicant benet.
M. E. Kaplama et al.
20.3.2 Bacterial Labyrinthitis
Bacterial labyrinthitis may be a complication of infection of the meninges or middle ear and occurs by two mechanisms: in suppurative cases, the pathogens themselves enter the inner ear; in serous cases, it is the entry of toxins synthesised by the bacte­rium or inammatory signalling molecules that trigger the condition. The most fre­quently occurring complication of a middle ear infection is actually labyrinthitis, which may represent 32% of all complications, whether intra- or extracranial, according to a single study [21].
Whilst bacterial labyrinthitis is seldom seen since antibiotics have become widely available, deafness is still often the outcome following meningitis [21]. Up to 20% of paediatric cases of meningitis feature symptoms related to balance and hearing [22]. In cases of meningitis, the symptoms are usually bilateral, in contrast to ear infections, which usually only affect one side [1].
20.3.2.1 Suppurative Labyrinthitis
Bacterial infection can track into the membranous labyrinth via the internal acoustic meatus or cochlear aqueduct from the cerebrospinal uid when meningitis is pres­ent. For bacteria causing otitis media or mastoiditis to reach the inner ear, there is usually dehiscence of the horizontal semicircular canal [23]. This crack in the bone typically occurs because of encroachment by cholesteatoma. Suppurative infection of the labyrinth occurring as a complication of middle ear infection is rare now that efcient antimicrobial treatments are available. Indeed, when seen, it is virtually invariably accompanied by cholesteatoma. Bacterial labyrinthitis frequently causes almost complete deafness, vertigo of high severity, ataxia, nausea and vomiting [1].
20.3.3 Serous Labyrinthitis
In cases of serous labyrinthitis, there are no actual pathogens within the inner ear. Instead, bacteriotoxins, inammatory signalling molecules or complement proteins traverse the round window, setting up an inammatory reaction in the labyrinth