Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_764_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
3 Anatomical Base forDiagnosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
23
can present red dots consisting of capillaries. A single plaque or segmentary plaque may be present.
Hyperpigmentation and telangiectasias are often found around clinically asymptomatic lesions. It is not a specic nding of venous insufciency because it can also be detected in other vascular disorders [10]. It may be a prog­nostic factor because its severity is associated with poor wound healing [11].
Stasis Dermatitis
Stasis dermatitis is a chronic eczema forming on the skin where venous stasis is present. Initially, it is more localized and subsequently extends. It is characterized by the presence of yellow serum crusts. Becoming chronic, it may have a lichenied appearance. Dermatitis around the lesion can also be aggravated by sensitization to topical drugs [9].
Pigmented Purpuric Dermatosis
Pigmented purpuric dermatoses are a group of dermatoses that may have different causes. Some triggers can be autoimmune pathologies such as dermatomyositis and rheumatoid arthritis, infec­tious pathologies such as infections with HBV and HCV, and neoplasias such as Hodgkin’s lym­phoma. There are also idiopathic forms such as Schamberg’s pigmentary purple, Majocchi’s tel­angiectasic purple, Doucas and Kapetanakis’ eczematid-like purple, and Gougerot and Blum’s lichenoid dermatitis. There is then a form that can develop in the context of venous insufciency of the lower limbs and is called chronic pigmentary Favre-Chaix purple. It is characterized by purple and hyperpigmentation associated with other signs of venous insufciency such as edema and cyanosis.
The hyperpigmentation is determined by hemo­siderosis or chronic hemoglobin deposition.
3.2.2 Arterial Leg Ulcers
Arterial ulcers usually develop in patients with peripheral arterial disease, represented in most cases by atherosclerosis. On physical examina­tion, arterial ulcers have well-demarcated bor­ders, and they seem to be “punched out” [7]. They are mainly located on bone prominences or pressure sites and particularly on the front of the legs, the toes, the forefoot, the malleolar region, and the heel, where vascularization is less effec­tive. Wounds are often painful. At the base of the wound, there is no granulation tissue but necro­sis. The skin around the lesion is often pale or cyanotic, cold, and atrophic. Alterations of the skin adnexa can be present. In severe peripheral arterial disease, the peripheral pulse may be absent and tissue necrosis may develop, which can lead to gangrene. However, this condition is present in just 20% of peripheral ulcers [12].
3.2.3 Diabetic Ulcers
Diabetic ulcers usually develop in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus for a long time. Diabetes causes damage to both peripheral nerves and arterial vessels. Diabetic ulcers may be asso­ciated with peripheral neuropathy with reduced tactile, vibratory, and pain sensitivity. Hyperkeratosis or callous can be present in areas under pressure and is a sign of risk for the forma­tion of this kind of ulcer. Diabetic ulcers are often located on the soles of the feet and the ngers. Diabetic ulcers can be deep to the bone. Soft­tissue infections and osteomyelitis should always be excluded as they increase the consequences and often the diagnosis is delayed. If osteomyeli­tis is suspected, it is necessary to carry out labo­ratory and imaging tests to exclude it.
Exudate
High ambulatory intravenous pressure can pro­duce exudate. The quality of the exudate and its composition may be useful for diagnosing an underlying infection.
3.2.4 Uncommon Type ofUlcers
Besides the main groups of ulcers represented by venous, arterial, and diabetic ones, there are some others. In these cases, the patient’s history is fun-
24
https://t.me/medicina_free
I. Zalaudek and M. Pauluzzi
damental for the diagnosis. However, they have some clinical features that can lead to the correct diagnosis.
3.2.4.1 Hematological Ulcers
Hematological ulcers develop in patients with beta-thalassemia or sickle cell anemia. There is an increased blood viscosity that leads to blood stasis and insufcient oxygen intake to the tis­sues, developing ulcers. The main features of these ulcers are dull pain and slow healing [13].
3.2.4.2 Martorell’s Ulcer
Martorell’s ulcer is an ischemic ulcer of the lower extremities in patients with hypertension. They present clinically with disproportionate pain to the size of the ulcer itself and a specic color. It is located at the middle third of the leg. Often, a cyanotic area can be seen, formed as a result of trauma. They expand quickly, having a bottom not very deep, clean margins, and a red center.
3.2.4.3 Lymphatic Ulcers
Lymphatic ulcers originate in tissues with chronic edema due to the accumulation of lymph. Cynically, there are often blistered lesions leav­ing erosions after their rupture. The bottom of the lesions is rosy, and cutaneous dystrophies around the ulcer can be found.
3.3 Dierential Diagnosis Based
onClinical Features
3.3.1 Localization
They are located at the right and left legs indif­ferently. The 21% of cases are bilateral. Venous ulcers can also involve the lateral malleoli, and one in 20 patients, the dorsum or lateral aspects of the feet [15].
Arterial ulcers are usually located on the ante­rior leg, distal dorsal foot, or toes and typically show additional signs of cyanosis and pain [4].
Neuropathic ulcers are usually deep. They are localized to the areas of highest body pressure such as plantar regions. Sometimes, they are associated with calluses, a sign of repeated trauma and pressure exerted.
Pressure ulcers are usually localized at the level of the coccyx, heels, and hips, typically above the bone prominences.
3.3.2 Size ofUlcers
Evaluating a patient with ulcers, another aspect to consider during the physical examination is the size of the ulcer. Venous ulcers are dimensionally larger than those of different etiology. Furthermore, venous ulcers are irregular, super­cial, with well-dened margins, and often local­ized on bone prominences. The recurrence of an ulcer in the same area is highly suggestive of a venous etiology [16].
The slow healing of arterial ulcers implies the presence of poor granulation tissue with some­times exposition of tendons. Arterial ulcers can also be associated with the absence of peripheral pulse, cold extremities, and longtime venous ll­ing [7].
The initial assessment of an ulcer must rst con­sider its localization.
Venous ulcers are more frequently located on the legs, while those on the foot are more fre­quently arterial or neuropathic ulcers [4].
Venous ulcers, also called varicose or stasis ulcers, [14] can occur anywhere on the leg. Specically, they are more often found near the medial malleolus. This anatomical region is called the “gaiter area” because it corresponds with the location of certain styles of boots of British soldiers.
3.3.3 Symptoms
Another important clinical aspect of diagnosis is the presence of symptoms. Venous ulcers are typically dened as asymptomatic. In patients with pain, a different etiology should be consid­ered, for example, arterial insufciency (Table3.1). However, 3/4 of patients report pain even with venous ulcers. Despite the symptoms, venous ulcers are extremely impacting on the life quality of the patients.
3 Anatomical Base forDiagnosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 3.1 Differential diagnosis between venous, arteriale and neuropathic extremity ulcers
Lower extremity ulcers—differential diagnosis Ulcer type Pathophysiology Location Morphology Symptoms Venous Venous
insufciency
Arterial Tissue ischemia Anterior leg, distal
Neuropathic Pressure trauma Foot below the ankle,
Gaiter area on medial malleolus
dorsal foot, anterior leg
Pressure sites
Supercial Varicose veins Edema Atrophie blanche Lipodermatosclerosis
Well-demarcated borders Pale Necrosis
Hyperkeratosis or callous
Evening pain Feeling of weight relieved by elevation of leg
Painful
Peripheral neuropathy
25
Arterial ulcers are extremely painful. Pain may be absent when associated with diabetic neuropathy.
Diabetic ulcers present the symptoms of peripheral neuropathy with tactile, painful, and vibratory sensory decits.
Coexisting comorbidities may also help dur­ing the diagnosis process. With concomitant rheumatologic diseases, (10–15% of patients with ulcers) arterial damage can be hypothesized. Diabetes mellitus more frequently deals with neuropathic or arterial ulcers.
References
1. Nelzen O, Bergquist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg. 1994;81:182–7.
2. Callam MJ, Harper DR, Dale JJ, Ruckley CV.Chronic ulcer of the leg: clinical history. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294(6584):1389–91. https://doi.
org/10.1136/bmj.294.6584.1389.
3. Spear M. Venous ulcers-an evidence-based update. Plast Surg Nurs. 2012;32(4):185–8. https://doi.
org/10.1097/PSN.0b013e31827781b8.
4. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufciency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44(3):401–24.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.111633.
5. Alguire PC, Mathes BM. Chronic venous insuf­ciency and venous ulceration. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:374–83.
6. Hampton S. An introduction to various types of leg ulcers and their management. Br J Nurs. (Mark
Allen Publishing). 2006; https://doi.org/10.12968/
bjon.2006.15.sup2.21235.
7. Millan SB, Gan R, Townsend PE. Venous ulcers: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100(5):298–305.
8. Wright N, Fitridge R.Varicose veins: natural history, assessment and management. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42(6):380–4.
9. Falanga V.Venous ulceration. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993;19(8):764–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-
4725.1993.tb00422.x.
10. Cooper DL. Atrophie blanche in a patient with gamma-heavy-chain disease. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(2):272b–273. https://doi.org/10.1001/
archderm.127.2.272b.
11. Greenberg AS, Hasan A, Montalvo BM, Falabella A, Falanga V. Acute lipodermatosclerosis is asso­ciated with venous insufciency. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(4):566–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0190- 9622(96)90681- 7.
12. Collins TC, Suarez-Almazor M, Petersen NJ. An absent pulse is not sensitive for the early detec­tion of peripheral arterial disease. Fam Med. 2006;38(1):38–42.
13. Van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, Mackaay AJ, de Boer EM, Wittens CH.Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, random­ized, multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(3):563–
71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053.
14. Chamanga ET.Understanding venous leg ulcers. Br J Community Nurs. 2018;23:S6–S15. https://doi.
org/10.12968/bjcn.2018.23.Sup9.S6.
15. Schneider C, Stratman S, Kirsner RS. Lower extremity ulcers. Med Clin N Am. 2021; https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.mcna.2021.04.006.
16. Collins L, Seraj S.Diagnosis and treatment of venous ulcers. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(8):989–96.
Wound Hygiene: FromTraditional
https://t.me/medicina_free
toMicroenvironment inCleansing
ArturoCaniglia
4
Since the birth of modern wound care according to the principles of healing in a moist environ­ment [1] and, certainly, for the last two decades, the focus of wound care professionals has mainly been the assessment, needs, and evolutionary state of the wound [2]. Despite the need to con­template a holistic vision [3] of the patient with skin ulcers being formalized in 2019, the impor­tance of hygiene, as a “set of behaviors aimed at good health,” has never been of such crucial importance as it has today.
Until very few years ago, in fact, if practices such as debridement, control of the bacterial load, or management of the exudate were poten­tially led by codied and shared procedures, with cleansing we relied on the assessment and discre­tion of the operator assuming, erroneously, that it could be taken for granted and that it was not sup­ported by well-dened scientic principles, other than those of common sense.
The methods of coarse removal of evident debris—such as the practice of “cleansing” was defined—were commonly performed only when blatantly necessary, mainly by means of irrigation with saline solution, Ringer lactate, or antiseptic solutions and, eminently, only on the wound bed and on the surrounding skin,
A. Caniglia (*) ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
understood as a radius of about 5cm around the lesion [4].
With the exception of any patient allergies of the patient to specic components, the only rec­ommendation was not to use histo-/cyto­damaging solutions or products expressly contraindicated for use on damaged skin.
Cleansing is the rst physical action of topical cleansing, both on the wound bed and peri-wound skin, to remove debris; it must be a constant act in standard care and is a process that promotes tis­sue regeneration and promotes healing.
It is important to constantly perform cleansing to reduce the bacterial load and remove devital­ized tissue, waste, and debris of various origins, thus enabling assessment of the wound back­ground and promoting optimal conditions for the repair process.
Wound cleansing algorithm is displayed in Fig.4.1.
A number of factors must be taken into account to perform proper cleansing:
• The right solution that must not be cytotoxic
and must not procure sensitivity reactions, but
must be biocompatible, and must reduce the
number of pathogenic microorganisms from
the bottom of the lesion.
• The right temperature should be body tem-
perature. Cold solutions should be avoided
because they slow down cell repair and cause
vasoconstriction, and by blocking mitotic
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Maruccia et al. (eds.), Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_4
27
28
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Caniglia
Wound Assessment
Clean
Epithelializing
Wound
Irrigate with < 7 PSI pressure, or pour solution over the wound bed.
Use at least 100cc’s of solution, at room or body temperature.
Cleanse the periwound skin of debris, exudates.
No antimicrobial solutions.
Clean Granulating
Wound, Decreasing in
Surface Area 20-30%
in 3-4 Weeks*
Irrigate with < 7 PSI pressure, or pour solution over the wound bed.
Use at least 100cc’s of solution, at room or body temperature.
No antimicrobial solutions.
Clean Granulating
Wound NOR
Decreasing in Size
20-30% in 3-4
Irrigate with 7-15 PSI pressure.
Use at least 150cc’s of solution, at room or body temperature.
Cleanse the periwound skin of debris, exudates.
*Granulationg wounds not decreasing in size may have a localized infection.
Necrotic Healable
Wound
(Debridement is
Appropriate)
Irrigate with 7-15 PSI pressure.
Use at least 150cc’s of solution, at room or body temperature.
Cleanse the periwound skin of debris, exudates.
Necrotic Non-
Healable Wound
(Debridement is NOT
Appropriate)
Do not irrigate or cleanse the wound itself (the intent is to allow the necrotic tissue to dry out and stabilize).
If there is exudate present on the periwound skin, gently cleanse it and pat dry.
Topical application of proviodine-ipdine solution or Chlorhexadine to the wound surface is appropriate, i.e. paint with Proviodine.
Fig. 4.1 Wound cleansing algorithm
activity for ¾hours, macrophages are inhib­ited, leukocyte activity is nullied, and this can result in the increased incidence of sepsis and cause discomfort and pain sensation to the patient.
• The right hydraulic force, i.e., an irrigation pressure, is 8psi.
• The right volume to ensure adequate cleansing over the entire lesion bed may vary depending on the size, but is usually quantied between 100 and 150ml.
The right technique is choosing between swabbing, soaking, or irrigation, the one that is most appropriate in a given context and that can guarantee the effectiveness of the cleansing process.
Cleansing should be done at every approach to the wound and at every dressing change, before and after the use of antiseptics, and before and after debridement procedures.
Commonly used simple isotonic cleansers include:
4 Wound Hygiene: FromTraditional toMicroenvironment inCleansing
https://t.me/medicina_free
29
• Physiologic Solution—Which is an isotonic solution, biocompatible, does not alter pH, maintains chemical balance at the bottom of the wound, and has no antimicrobial action.
• Drinking Water—Not a very popular method although recommended by some authors in the literature.
• Ringer’s Lactate Solution—Contains lactic acid, calcium chloride, sodium chloride, and potassium chloride that is credited with pro­moting skin trophism.
Recent generation cleansers, on the other
hand, are:
• Surfactant enriched with surface-active action such as the combination of polyhexanide (Phmb), which is an antimicrobial substance that inhibits the growth of microorganisms, and betaine (surfactant), which acts on biolm by promoting its detachment and inhibiting bacterial growth.
• Superoxidized solutions with chlorine that reduce the microbial load and help create a favorable environment for the healing process.
In June 2020, supported by numerous studies
[58], biolm was formally identied as the pri­mary cause of delayed wound healing [9], effec­tively redening, on the basis of the characteristics of this community of pathogens, a skin ulcer management approach according to an operating procedure in four consequential phases (cleans­ing, debridement, reactivation of the edges, and medication), published in an International Consensus document called, not surprisingly, Wound Hygiene [10].
Here, it is unequivocal how much the very
purposes of cleansing must inevitably change, hand in hand with the evolution of our knowledge about the causes of delayed healing, moving toward a methodical application of cleansing pro­cedures, made up of consequential steps, extended to a large area of healthy skin (at least a 10–20 cm radius around the lesion, given the migratory capacity of mature biolm colonies [11, 12]), and with specic solutions and methods.
Hygiene and, more precisely, the cleansing procedure of healthy skin, as well as that affected by the lesion, become a direct tool to contrast the chronicity status of the lesion, acquiring an essential importance and a new denition, which includes, in addition to the removal of visible dirt, even that of what is invisible, i.e., antisepsis [1012].
According to current evidence [11, 12], sim­ple irrigation with solutions, albeit antiseptic, is not effective for the disintegration of the biolm EPS matrix and, therefore, for the elimination of pathogens and elements favoring their engraft­ment and proliferation.
A correct cleansing procedure involves three consecutive acts [13, 14] necessarily united by a mechanical action of variable intensity, depend­ing on the etiology of the lesion [10, 15], one’s own skills15, and the evolutionary state of the tis­sues [15]:
1. Transition with surfactant solutions or non-
foaming soaps at physiological pH [16]. Surfactants, especially if left in a compress, have the ability to reduce surface tension and consequently facilitate the removal of debris and of the EPS matrix (consisting mainly of polysaccharides)12, which protects the bacte­rial colonies of the biolm from the action of antimicrobials. Furthermore, it appears that they can help reduce the perception of proce­dural pain in the patient [17]. Respecting the pH of the skin also helps to preserve its func­tional characteristics and to create an environ­ment hostile to bacterial engraftment.
2. Passage with antiseptic solutions.
Antimicrobials, if used subsequently or con­comitantly to the mechanical action, allow effective bacterial killing and inhibition of the sessile aggregation of pathogens [9, 1113]. When choosing the active ingredient, solu­tions with high cytotoxic power, for example, based on hydrogen peroxide or povidone– iodine, are not recommended [13, 18].
3. Rinse with saline or Ringer lactate. The inten-
sive and repeated use of surfactant and anti­septic solutions could lead to impairment of skin integrity, as well as induced irritation or sensitization phenomena [1921]. The good
30
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. Caniglia
health of the wound bed, peri-wound skin, and healthy skin are essential for a rapid heal­ing process.
To be effective, each of these steps should be performed with the application of mechanical energy, with due exceptions for all those lesions whose etiology determines an explicit contraindi­cation (e.g., neoplastic, autoimmune, and isch­emic lesions [10, 15]).
Furthermore, the intensity of action should respect the progressive state of the tissues and modulate accordingly, reducing the intensity as the positive results of the entire treatment are conrmed and as epithelialization approaches [15]:
• Necrotic Tissue: Vigorous action, compatible
with the patient’s procedural pain, to ensure
adequate reclamation of the environment.
• Slough: Vigorous action, compatible with the
patient’s procedural pain, to ensure adequate
reclamation of the environment.
• Unhealthy Granulation: Vigorous action,
compatible with the patient’s procedural pain,
to ensure adequate reclamation of the
environment.
• Healthy Granulation: Moderate action, so as
not to cause traumatism.
• Epithelialization: Delicate action, in order not
to damage the newly formed tissues, but to
ensure the reclamation of the environment in
the most critical phase of scarring.
The appropriate tools for the transmission of mechanical energy can vary, depending on the materials available, from pre-soaked sponges, to pads and common gauzes, in which case frequent replacement is suggested.
In addition, particular attention should be paid to the removal of hyperkeratotic plaques or skin scales, often home to biolm colonies with the ability to cross-migrate between the wound bed and surrounding areas of healthy skin.
Compliance with the correct execution is essential in contributing to the disintegration of the biolm, in the inhibition of its reformation, in creating an environment hostile to the contamina-
tion and proliferation of pathogens and, there­fore, in accelerating the natural healing process of the lesions.
References
1. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of supercial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293.
2. Schultz GS, Gary Sibbald R, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W.Wound bed preparation: a sys­tematic approach to wound management.
3. International consensus document. Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds. Part 3 February 2020. Br J Health Care Manag 14(2):80-83.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2020.14.2.80.
4. LeBlanc K, Beeckman D, Campbell K, et al. Best practice recommendations for prevention and man­agement of periwound skin complications. Wounds International; 2021.
5. Høiby etal, 2015; Wolcott etal, 2016; Wolcott, 2017.
6. Bjarnsholt T, Eberlein T, Malone M, etal. Management of biolm. Wounds International. 2017;8:2.
7. Schultz G, Bjarnsholt T, James GA, etal. Consensus guidelines for the identication and treatment of bio­lms in chronic nonhealing wounds. Wound Repair Regen.
8. Haesler E, Swanson T, Ousey K, etal. Clinical indica­tors of wound infection and biolm: reaching inter­national consensus. J Wound Care. 2019;28:s4–12.
https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup3b.S4.
9. International Wound Infection Institute (IWII). Wound infection in clinical practice: international consensus update 2016. Wounds International; 2016.
10. Murphy C, Atkin L, Swanson T, Tachi M, Tan YK, Vega de Ceniga M, Weir D, Wolcott R.International consensus document. Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibiolm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. J Wound Care. 2020;29(Suppl 3b):S1–28.
11. Stewart PS. Biophysics of biolm infec­tion. Pathog Dis. 2014;70:212–8. https://doi.
org/10.1111/2049-632X.12118.
12. Malone M, Swanson T. Biolm-based wound care: the importance of debridement in biolm treatment strategies. Br J Community Nurs. 2017;22:S20–5.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.Sup6.S20.
13. Wolcott R, Fletcher J. The role of wound cleans­ing in the management of wounds. Wounds Int. 2014;1(1):25–30.
14. Kamolz L-P, Wild T. Wound bed preparation: the impact of debridement and wound cleansing. Wound Med. 2013;1:44–50.
15. Murphy C, Atkin L, Vega de Ceniga M, Weir D, Swanson T. International consensus document. Embedding Wound Hygiene into a proactive wound healing strategy. J Wound Care. 2022;31:S1–S24.
4 Wound Hygiene: FromTraditional toMicroenvironment inCleansing
https://t.me/medicina_free
31
16. Percival SL, Chen R, Mayer D, et al. Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efcacy on biolms. Int Wound J. 2018;15:749–55.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.1292216.
17. Tyldesley HC, Salisbury A, Chen R, etal. Surfactants and their role in biolm management in chronic wounds. Wounds Int. 2019;10(1):20–4.
18. Sibbald RG, Leaper DJ, Queen D.Iodine made easy. Wounds Int. 2011;2:2.
19. Antisepsi e disinfezione in ambito sanitario e socio­sanitario Regione Emilia Romagna aprile 2011.
20. Roberts CD, Leaper D, Assadian O.The role of topi­cal antiseptic agents within antimicrobial stewardship strategies for prevention and treatment of surgical site and chronic open wound infection. Adv Wound Care. 2017;6(2):63–71.
21. Alves PJ, etal. Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical coloni­zation and\or biolm. Int Wound J. 2020:1–17.
Principles ofAntiseptic Treatments
https://t.me/medicina_free
ElisabettaIacopi , FrancescoGiangreco, andAlbertoPiaggesi
5
5.1 Denition ofAntisepsis
Antisepsis is a term that derives from the Greek words αντι,” which stands for “against” and “σψις meaning “putrefaction.” It consists in the complete abolition of bacterial load, both pathogenic and not from a naturally or articially sterilized substrate [1]. Antisepsis procedures aim to get an ideal state in which it has been achieved the complete absence of pathogenetic organisms and transient ora: the asepsis. Antisepsis can be considered as the collection of preventative methods to promote asepsis [2].
Antisepsis in this sense must be distinct from “disinfection,” which is related to the elimination of only pathogenic species, and from “steriliza­tion,” which consists in the process of full removal of all bacteria, viruses, and fungi from a solid, aerial, or liquid medium [3].
5.2 History ofAntisepsis
The great physicians of ancient ages knew infec­tion as pathological entity and were aware of its importance in determining death for many patients. They were still completely clueless regarding possible causes of infection, and there-
E. Iacopi (*) · F. Giangreco · A. Piaggesi Diabetic Foot Section, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
fore, no concept regarding antisepsis or disinfec­tion was developed [4].
The rst proof of some attempts to treat skin wounds to achieve healing dates back to Ancient Egypt where many papyri report suggestions regarding ulcer treatment. Egyptian doctors had understood the importance of cleaning ulcers: They used honey and donkey feces that are rich in trypsin, an amino acid subsequently proven to be involved in healing processes. They further­more suggested to clean wounds with boiled water or wine [5].
About one thousand years later, other reports of wound treatment were reported in Mesopotamia, under the age of Sumeri. They produced more than 19 different types of beer using some of them also for medical purposes, in particular, applying it on chronic wounds. They also used a mixture of different herbs, among which Aloe Barbadensis, to avoid worsening the wound’s conditions [6].
Going forward also regarding wound approach, as for many other medicinal elds, the Greeks were forerunners and visionaries. The most important intuitions were attributable to Galen, a philosopher and doctor from Pergamum who worked in Greece and Rome and who, in occasion of an epidemic, suggested to isolate affected patients and to keep people away from the city; Hippocrates, instead, for rst described the best behavior in case of wounds. He started to clean the wound with vinegar or wine and to
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Maruccia et al. (eds.), Pearls and Pitfalls in Skin Ulcer Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45453-0_5
33
34
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. Iacopi et al.
cover it with clean towels. They were aware that there was something deeper to be understood but still far from achieving full comprehension [7].
Contemporarily, in Asia, both Ayurvedic Indian medicine and traditional Chinese one developed some theories focused on the search for useful substances to heal wounds. Indian medicine foresaw the complete cleansing of the wound and then the application of copper or sil­ver powder and of turmeric paste that contains curcumin, a powerful anti-inammatory active principle still in use nowadays, and also able to control pain symptoms [8]. In China, instead, the use of herbs was spreading to control inamma­tion, and their application on chronic wounds was considered particularly important.
In the Middle Ages, Europe underwent a long period of obscurantism and scientic censorship in which superstition and religion prevented, with their limitations, the evolution of medical knowledge in general. Therefore, also the aware­ness and knowledge in terms of wound infection and wound healing were limited [9]. In this period, the only ndings were attributable to Hieronymus Fracastorius and Francois Parè. The former postulated that the cause of infectious dis­eases was invisible living seeds. In his work, “De contagione” published in 1546, he described three modalities of disease spreading: direct con­tact with infected persons, indirect contact with fomites, and airborne transmission. Parè, consid­ered one of the fathers of modern surgery, simi­larly believed infection was introduced from the environment and highlighted the importance of a sterile environment in the prevention of disease transmission [10].
In the Modern Ages, with the evolution of medical knowledge and the development of sur­gical techniques, great relevance was given to the huge frequency of post-surgery infection. It was related to dramatic hygiene conditions of hospi­tals, surgical elds, and instruments [11]. First, Ignac Semmelweiss, in the nineteenth century, a Hungarian surgeon who led the rst division of the maternity hospital at Vienna General Hospital, forced doctors, nurses, and midwives to clean their hands with a solution of calcium chloride before visiting women in labor. The result was a
sudden collapse of puerperal fever and subse­quent deaths [12].
The modern concept of infection was born in 1861 by the father of microbiology: Louis Pasteur. With the famous chicken broth experi­ment, he refuted the theory of spontaneous gen­eration according to which bacteria, protozoa, and other microscopic beings could arise directly from matter [13]. In the same period in Germany, an arch-competitor of Pasteur, Robert Koch, demonstrated the direct microbe’s responsibility in the development of infectious diseases. The German physician and scientist, through his stud­ies on tuberculosis and cholera, created the so­called Koch Postulates, which earned him the Nobel Prize in 1905. In these rules, he stated that the pathogenetic microorganism must be present in affected patients, isolable and cultivable, and when inoculated in a healthy subject must deter­mine the initial disease [14].
Eventually, Joseph Lister, a Professor of Surgery at Glasgow, in the 60s of the nineteenth century applied Pasteur discoveries in clinical surgical practice, and he observed that cases of infection were much more numerous in over­crowded hospitals in English cities than in the countryside, where the patient was usually treated in farmhouses. Based on these assumptions, he understood that infection and gangrene were associated with transmission of microorganisms among patients. He therefore decided to apply on an exposed fracture, a recently synthesized com­pound used as a disinfectant for sewers: phenol, at the time called carbolic acid. With this method, he managed to avoid the death of the patient. He continued to use this substance in a series of patients and described his experience in a paper published on Lancet in 1867, entitled “Antiseptic Principle of the Practice of Surgery” where the term “antisepsis” [15] appeared for the rst time.
5.3 Denition ofAntiseptic
Agent
Antiseptic is dened as an agent able to inhibit the growth and development of microorganisms. Antiseptics are chemical products with antimi-