Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4451_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
131
Fig. 73 Tongue ap for the buccal mucosa defect
Fig. 74 Follow-up photo showing slight trismus with
well-inset free radial forearm ap for the oral commissure and lower lip defect
Fig. 76 One-year follow-up photo showing good epithe­lisation of FRAFF
Fig. 77 One-year follow-up of the oor of mouth advancement with buccal fat pad grafting for marginal mandibulectomy defect
Fig. 75 Upper lip and commissure defect reconstructed with the FRAFF
Fig. 78 Bipaddle FRAFF for the buccal mucosa and cheek skin defect
132
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 79 One-year follow-up of the oor mouth advance­ment with the skin grafting
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 82 Deltopectoral ap reconstruction for the osteora­dionecrosis debridement of the mandible
Fig. 80 Six-month follow-up showing good mouth open­ing in FRAFF reconstruction
Fig. 81 Six-month follow-up of buccal fat pad grafting for buccal mucosa malignancy
Fig. 83 Forehead ap reconstructions are usually not done commonly as the rst line of management. This was done for patients with a second primary in the oral cavity and previously operated neck
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 84 Tongue ap for marginal mandibulectomy defect
133
Fig. 87 Intraoral view of PMMC ap
Fig. 85 Contractures may form within the oral cavity if a
large buccal mucosa defect is not reconstructed with a ap
Fig. 86 Chest wall wound showing well-healed PMMC ap scar
Fig. 88 Postoperative view of FRAFF: ap monitoring can be done by colour, skin turgor and scratching the ap with a 22G needle, checking the ap blood sugar and cor­relating it with the peripheral blood sugar
134
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 91 Intraoral view of free bula osteocutaneous ap
Fig. 89 Radial free forearm ap defect closed with the
split skin grafting
Fig. 90 Excellent contour following mid-segmental mandibulectomy defect reconstruction with free bula osteocutaneous ap
Fig. 92 Free bula osteocutaneous ap for mid­segmental mandibulectomy
Fig. 93 Mid-segmental mandibulectomy with deltopec­toral ap reconstruction after 1year
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 94 Follow-up of free bula osteocutaneous ap for recurrent ameloblastoma resection with skin involvement
135
Fig. 97 Intraoral view of free bula osteocutaneous ap for the posterior segmental mandibulectomy
Fig. 95 Excellent contour following free bula osteocu­taneous ap
Fig. 96 Contour following the right segmental mandibu­lectomy reconstruction with free bula osteocutaneous ap
3.5 Reconstruction Options
The aims are to restore the form and function. Whether to repair a defect depends on its size and depth, and whether there is a through-and­through defect into the neck:
Fig. 98 Primary closure was done to close the buccoal­veolar defect
• Buccal soft tissue defect only: Small defects
can be closed primarily or left to granulate and
heal by secondary intention like a tonsillec-
tomy defect. Larger defects that include resec-
tion of the buccinator muscle that are left to
granulate may lead to signicant trismus due
to scarring and contraction of the scar tissue.
• Marginal mandibulectomy: A marginal man-
dibulectomy defect can be strengthened with
an onlay bula or radial forearm osseocutane-
136
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 99 A dental step prosthesis can be used to prevent the upper dentition impinging on the lower alveolar reconstruction
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 101 Reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh ap for composite defect
Fig. 100 The prosthesis prevents the upper dentition impinging on the FFOCF, especially while taking adju­vant radiotherapy
ous ap or a vascularised soft tissue ap may be used to close the exposed bone.
• Segmental mandibulectomy: If the resection crosses the midline and includes the mandibular arch, e.g. mid-third mandible seg­ment, reconstruction with an osseocutaneous free ap is mandatory to avoid a debilitating Andy Gump deformity:
– For lateral and posterior segmental or
hemimandibulectomy defects, reconstruc-
Fig. 102 Heister’s mouth gag can be used to rehabilitate the patients with reduced mouth opening
Fig. 103 Plate can be exposed due to ORN: such exposed plates must be removed, and a vascularised ap must use to close the ORN wound
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 104 Hyperpigmentation can occur in the eld of radiation
Fig. 105 Mucositis can occur as a consequence of radiotherapy
tion with a pectoralis major myocutaneous ap is an acceptable alternative if osseocu­taneous free ap reconstruction is not pos­sible or is inadvisable, e.g. in the elderly, frail and unt.
• Large soft tissue defect: A large soft tissue defect following, e.g. a “bite excision” or infratemporal fossa clearance can be recon­structed with pedicled aps (forehead, tempo­ralis, pectoralis major, deltopectoral) or free aps (radial free forearm, anterolateral free thigh).
• Facial skin defect: The skin can be recon­structed by bipaddling a radial free forearm, anterolateral thigh or pectoralis major ap to provide both inner and external skin covers. Else a double ap, i.e. one ap to cover the
137
inner mucosal and soft tissue defect and the other to cover the skin loss, can be used:
– Commissure defects—primary closure of
the lip commissure usually leads to trismus and reduced mouth opening:
Estlander ap can be modied to feed the oral commissure defects. One must be extremely careful while dealing with the commissure defects following midline lip split incision. The intervening lip and skin may be devas­cularised due to loss of blood supply from the superior and inferior labial arteries. The bipaddled ap can be fed into the commissure by deepithelisation of split­ting the ap. A small intervening skin may be left at the point of skin paddle fold to create the new commissure.
– Whenever oncologically safe, the commis-
sure must be left intact as it is the func­tional unit of the lip, helping in oral competence.
• Split skin graft: Split skin grafts can be employed for supercial defects. The graft is harvested from the thigh, and the mucosal defect is quilted with the skin graft with absorbable sutures. Pressure is applied to the graft by using a bolster, e.g. BIPP impreg­nated gauze, which is tied over the graft and kept in situ for 5days. However, using a split skin graft for deeper and larger defects causes brosis that may cause trismus.
• Buccal fat pad graft: The buccal fat is conve­niently located in the posterior part of the buc­cal space and can be gently delivered into the defect and used to ll the defect. It subse­quently mucosalises. In some cases, it may cause a scar band and trismus.
• Pectoralis major ap: This was the workhorse of oral cavity reconstruction prior to the advent of free microvascular tissue transfer aps. The pectoralis major ap has a robust blood supply and has a long pedicle length which makes it amenable to reconstruction of a defect as superior as the lower border of the
138
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
zygoma; the shape of the ap can be adjusted to the shape of the defect; and a large ap can be harvested. It remains a good choice when free aps are not available, as a salvage proce­dure for a failed free aps or when patients cannot tolerate a long procedure, e.g. the elderly and inrm.
• Nasolabial ap: The nasolabial ap has advan­tages that the donor site is adjacent to the defect and that the ap is thin and pliable and has a robust blood supply that permits shaping of the ap to precisely ll the defect. A larger defect, particularly when located anteriorly, can be covered with bilateral nasolabial aps.
• Tongue ap: Advantages are that the ap is harvested adjacent to the defect and that there is insignicant donor site morbidity. Generally a posteriorly based ap is used.
• Floor of mouth advancement can be used to close the marginal mandibulectomy defects.
• Temporalis ap: This is favoured by some sur­geons. It is based on the deep temporal artery which courses close to the coronoid process of the mandible which this has to be preserved.
• Forehead ap: It has a robust blood supply and is pliable, and the entire forehead can be uti­lised. It is however associated with signicant cosmetic morbidity and is therefore generally reserved as a second-line reconstructive option.
• Deltopectoral ap: It is quick and easy to har­vest, has consistent anatomy and is a pliable ap. For oral cavity repair, it generally requires a second-stage surgery after 3weeks to dis­connect the pedicle.
• Radial free forearm ap: It is a thin, pliable ap with a consistent blood supply and a long vascular pedicle. It is quick and easy to har­vest. Donor site morbidity is worse than with anterolateral thigh free aps. Its pliability makes it amenable to reconstruct a variety of oral defects. It can also be harvested as an osseocutaneous ap.
• Anterolateral free thigh ap: It can be har­vested with the muscle and hence used for larger soft tissue defects. Donor site morbidity is insignicant.
• Radial osseocutaneous ap: This can be com­plicated by fractures of the remaining radius
and restriction of forearm range of movement.
• Free bula ap: Advantages include long bone length, a segmental blood supply making mul­tiple osteotomies feasible and minimal donor site morbidity. Single vascular pedicle is most commonly used for maxillary and orbital defects.
3.6 Postoperative Care
• Airway: Elective tracheostomy is always indi­cated if mandibular resection crosses the mid­line with excision of both genial tubercles resulting in the tongue dropping back, exten­sive composite palatal resection or buccal mucosal resection requiring reconstruction with a bulky ap.
• Position: Maintain the patient at 15 degrees head high to reduce venous congestion and bleeding. Maintain a head position that avoids twisting of the vascular pedicle of a free ap.
• Feeding: Patients are fed by nasogastric feed­ing tube for at least 5 days, and until that patient is able to tolerate their own saliva.
• Antibiotics: A broad-spectrum antibiotic is administered for 24h.
3.7 Rehabilitation
• Jaw stretching exercises: Trismus is one of the most common and most disabling sequelae of surgery for buccal cancer because of scarring and shortening of the muscles of mastication, as well as scarring in the tumour bed and of the ap or skin graft. Jaw stretching exercises should commence after initial wound healing, i.e. about 5–7days after surgery, and should be continued for a long period of time.
• Bite guide prosthesis: Unopposed contraction of the opposite muscles of mastication results in deviation of the lower jaw following hemi­mandibulectomy. A bite guide prosthesis pre­vents this deviation and should be used for at least 6–8weeks following surgery until com­plete healing has occurred.
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
139
4 Principles ofManagement
ofPalatal Tumours
Small lesions may be treated with transoral-wide local excision with resection performed to the level of the bony portion of the hard palate with anticipated reepithelialisation. The periosteum of the palatal bone acts as a barrier to spread; exci­sion with bony preservation may be adequate for small lesions. Involvement of the periosteum requires removal of a portion of the bony palate, and partial or subtotal maxillectomy is required for larger lesions and for those that involve the maxillary antrum. For malignancies that extend along the greater palatine nerve, biopsy of this nerve is important for identifying neurotropic spread. Small- to medium-sized defects may be reconstructed with the aid of a temporalis, palatal island, facial artery musculomucosal or buccal fat pad ap. For lesions that result in a palatal defect after resection, prosthetic rehabilitation can offer the patient an excellent functional result. In this circumstance, a maxillofacial prosthodontist may construct a splint preopera­tively for use at the time of resection. A split­thickness skin graft is used to cover edges of the bone from the osteotomy and surrounding soft tissue. The cavity is then packed with petroleum gauze, and a screw or wire xation can be used to secure the prosthesis to the maxilla and to pro­vide support to the underlying repair. The tempo­rary prosthesis is removed approximately 1week later, and the packing is evacuated; an interim prosthesis is worn until a more permanent option can be tailored to the resultant defect:
1. Approaches to the surgical management of tumours limited to the hard palate and alveo­lar ridge include:
(a) Wide local excision—palatectomy—fen-
estration procedure.
(b) Partial lateral maxillectomy: Surgical
approach for tumours of the hard palate that involve the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity.
(c) Inferior maxillectomy: Surgical approach
for tumours of the hard palate that do not involve the oor of the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity.
2. Approach to benign mucosal tumours of the palate (biopsy-conrmed benign tumours only involving the mucosa (i.e. pleomorphic adenoma, etc.))
(a) Wide excision 0.5-cm margins of the
lesion.
(b) The deep margin should be the perios-
teum of the hard palate.
(c) If there is a concern for tumour involve-
ment deep to the periosteum, the surface of the hard palate is drilled with a burr to remove the supercial layer of the bone.
3. Reconstruction—A palatal island rotational ap or rotational ap based on either the greater palatine or ascending palatine arteries is used to cover the site of the defect.
4.1 Technique ofInfrastructure
Maxillectomy
• The approach can be either intraoral or by
upper cheek ap approach.
• Intraoral approach: Retract the lips with a
hands-free cheek retractor, a bite block or a side-biting mouth gag to gain access to the oral cavity.
• Intraorally, mark the margins of the resection
with a marking pen or electrocautery.
• Margins should be a minimum of 1cm for any
lesion suspicious of malignancy or biopsy­proven malignancy.
• The maxillary sinus is entered, and the infe-
rior aspect of the maxillary sinus is thoroughly evaluated.
• A sagittal saw is used to make precise
osteotomies:
– The osteotomy is usually completed with
the osteotome at the level of the pterygoid plates.
• The nasal cavity is entered, and the septum is
transected with heavy curved Mayo scissors 1–2cm superior to the oor of the nose.
• The soft palate is transected with electrocau-
tery, and any residual soft tissue attachments are transected with scissors.
• After the mucosa of the maxillary antrum is
removed as previously described, the inferior turbinate is also removed to prevent infection
140
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
and oedema, which would interfere with the application of a palatal prosthesis.
• More extensive tumours limited to the hard palate and alveolar ridge can be removed by simply extending the osteotomies.
• Once the specimen is removed, it is sent to the pathology laboratory for frozen section diag­nosis and assurance of clear surgical margins.
• A split skin graft can be placed to cover the cheek, and an obturator is planned.
The surgical steps of infrastructure maxillec-
tomy and its follow-up are depicted in Figs.106,
107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112 and 113.
4.2 Rehabilitation
The four major means of rehabilitation include:
1. Dental prosthetic management: A patient with a limited lesion of the alveolar ridge alone or the alveolar ridge and palate that does not involve more than half the hard palate can be rehabilitated relatively easily. Preoperative dental impressions are made, and a surgical splint is fashioned and inserted at the time of resection as described earlier. Prostheses are designed according to the Aramany classica­tion. The permanent prosthesis will have teeth
Fig. 106 Marking for the intraoral infrastructure maxillectomy
Fig. 107 Infrastructure maxillectomy defect
Fig. 108 Specimen of infrastructure maxillectomy
Fig. 109 Medial view of the infrastructure maxillectomy
defect