Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4451_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 6 Growth on the left lateral border with good mouth opening, a good candidate for peroral resection
111
Fig. 8 Posteriorly based growth on the left lateral border of the tongue: the posterior margin is not visible ade­quately. A cheek ap approach may be required in such cases
Fig. 7 Growth on the dorsum of the tongue, such lesions entail anterior second/third glossectomy
2.1 Types ofGlossectomies
This was proposed by Ansarin and colleagues in 2019 [23]:
• Type I glossectomy (mucosectomy)—The mucosa and submucosa are included up to the intrinsic muscle bres of the tongue. The deep resection margin should include a thin layer of the intrinsic muscles because of a possible
invasion of the submucosa. Generally, the wound is left to heal by secondary intention, although the defect may be partially closed primarily:
– Indication: Precancerous, supercial suspi-
cious lesions, limited to the epithelium of the tongue without previous biopsy
• Type II glossectomy (partial glossectomy)—It includes the lesion and adjacent normal mucosa, submucosa and the intrinsic muscles up to the surface of the extrinsic muscles (when the directions of the muscle bres change), with appropriate safety margins:
– Lesions inltrating the submucosa and
supercially into intrinsic muscles, but not extrinsic muscles, or inltration less than 10mm deep
• Type IIIa glossectomy (hemiglossectomy)— The specimen includes the mucosa, submu­cosa and intrinsic and extrinsic muscles ipsilateral to the lesion. The mucosa is resected up to the healthy tissue with appropriate safety margins (at least 1.5 cm); the lingual artery must be ligated and removed en bloc with the lingual and hypoglossal nerves, in the speci-
112
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
men of the primary tumour and neck nodes. The base of the ipsilateral tongue is preserved. The tip of the tongue can be preserved or not:
– Lesions inltrating the intrinsic and mini-
mally extrinsic muscles or inltration greater than 10mm but conned within the ipsilateral tongue
• Type IIIb glossectomy (compartmental hemi­glossectomy)—The specimen includes the mucosa, submucosa, intrinsic and extrinsic muscles ipsilateral to the lesion, genioglossus, hyoglossus and styloglossus muscles and the inferior portion of the palatoglossus muscle. Medially, the midline raphe is included in the resection. The lingual nerve is resected as far cranially as possible. The hypoglossal nerve is removed after the ansa, the lingual artery and vein are ligated in proximity to the horn of the hyoid bone and removed en bloc with speci­men and neck nodes:
– Lesions massively inltrating the intrinsic
and extrinsic muscles but conned to the ipsilateral tongue
• Type IVa glossectomy (subtotal glossec­tomy)—This is an anterior subtotal glossec­tomy with preservation of both sides of the base of the tongue, posterior hyoglossus muscle and hypoglossal and lingual nerves, from the less involved side:
– Lesions that arise in the anterior portion of
the mobile tongue and exceed the hemilin­gual area of origin involving the contralat­eral genioglossus muscle but limited to mobile tongue
• Type IVb (near-total glossectomy)—Type IVa glossectomy with extension to the ipsilateral base of the tongue. The following contralat­eral structures are preserved: hyoglossus and styloglossus muscles, hypoglossal and lingual nerves and lingual artery (functional unit of the base of the tongue):
– Massive lesions that exceed the border of
the hemilingual area of origin inltrating the ipsilateral base of the tongue and the contralateral genioglossus muscle
• Type V glossectomy (total glossectomy)— The specimen includes all of the mobile tongue and the base of the tongue transected at the level of the vallecula; it includes intrinsic and extrinsic muscles, both lingual arteries, hypoglossal, lingual nerves and the oor of the mouth:
– Massive inltrating lesions, for instance,
those of the anterior ventral surface of the tongue, dorsum of the tongue or the tongue base, which bilaterally involve the extrinsic genioglossus, hyoglossus and styloglossus with impairment of the mobility of the tongue.
2.2 Indications forPeroral
Approach
• Good mouth opening.
• All of the tumour margins are visible.
• Anteriorly placed tumours.
• Able to perform satisfactory reconstruction.
2.3 Indications forLower Cheek
Flap Approach
• Trismus.
• Deep inltrative tumours.
• Posteriorly placed tumours.
• Tumours reaching the base of the tongue.
• Need for composite resection.
2.4 Indications forVisor Approach
• Trismus.
• Posteriorly placed tumours.
• Total or near-total glossectomy.
Follow-up photographs of surgical excision of
tongue malignancy are depicted in Figs. 9, 10,
11, 12, 13 and 14.
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 9 Wedge primary closure following tongue-wide local excision
113
Fig. 11 Tongue defect left to heal by secondary intention
Fig. 10 Longitudinal closure helps in maintaining the tip and tongue length
2.5 Reconstruction Options forTongue Defects
• Partial glossectomy defects:
– Primary closure:
Wedge closure. Longitudinal.
– Healing by secondary intention. – Pedicled aps:
Facial artery myomucosal aps. Nasolabial aps.
Fig. 12 Follow-up after 6months
Submental aps. Infrahyoid ap. Supraclavicular ap. Pectoralis major myofascial ap (PMMF).
– Free Flap.
Radial free forearm ap.
114
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 13 One-year follow-up after wedge closure
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
• Hemiglossectomy defects. – Pedicled aps.
Facial artery myomucosal aps. Nasolabial aps. Submental aps. Infrahyoid ap. Supraclavicular ap. Pectoralis major myofascial ap (PMMF).
– Free Flap.
Radial free forearm ap. Anterolateral thigh ap. Free bula osseocutaneous ap (FFOCF) for composite defects.
• Total or near-total glossectomy. – Pedicled aps:
Pectoralis major myocutaneous ap.
– Free aps:
Free radial forearm ap. Free anterolateral thigh ap.
The specimen of tongue composite lingual plate marginal mandibulectomy is shown in Fig.15.
Surgical steps for islanded nasolabial ap for reconstruction following tongue-wide local exci­sion are depicted in Figs.16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and
21.
Patient underwent tongue-wide local excision with free radial forearm ap reconstruction that is shown in Figs.22 and 23.
Follow-up photos are depicted in Figs.24, 25,
26, 27, 28, 29 and 30.
Fig. 14 One-month follow-up following Trotter’s proce­dure for the base of tongue tumour excision
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 15 Specimen of tongue composite lingual plate mar­ginal mandibulectomy
115
Fig. 16 Marking for islanded nasolabial ap reconstruc­tion for tongue defects
Fig. 17 Islanded nasolabial ap with its intact vessels
116
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 20 Intraoral photo showing the nasolabial ap t­ting into the defect like a jigsaw
Fig. 18 Islanded nasolabial ap with its intact blood vessels
Fig. 19 Following islanded nasolabial ap inset
Fig. 21 Hair growth on the ap indicates good ap vas-
cularity. Depilation may be required if hair growth is troublesome
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
117
Fig. 22 McGregor incision and cheek ap approach for the tongue composite resection
Fig. 23 Postoperative picture showing the free radial artery forearm ap reconstruction following hemiglossec­tomy composite segmental mandibulectomy
Fig. 24 Excellent scar following nasolabial ap reconstruction
Fig. 25 Well-healed scar following tongue composite resection
Fig. 26 En face view shows negligible scar following reconstruction
118
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 27 One-year follow-up showing good graft uptake in the left radial forearm
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 28 Excellent mucosalisation of the islanded nasola­bial ap, fourth month of follow-up
Fig. 29 (a, b) One-year follow-up after hemiglossectomy with free radial forearm ap
Oral Cavity andNeck Dissection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 30 Total glossectomy with free radial forearm reconstruction
3 Principles ofManagement
ofBuccoalveolar Cancers
Carcinoma of the buccal mucosa represents 5–10% of all oral cavity malignancies and has a 4: 1 male predominance; the typical patient is in the sixth decade of life. An association between smokeless tobacco use and buccal carcinomas has been noted, and an increased incidence of these tumours is seen in the western population. In India, betel nut use is associated with a high incidence of buccal carcinoma.
The site of the buccal mucosa where squa­mous carcinoma is most frequently noted is adja­cent to the third mandibular molar. Patients with advanced-stage disease may present with trismus as a result of direct invasion of the tumour into the muscles of mastication, and parotid duct involvement may produce obstructive sialadeni­tis. Anterior lesions metastasise regionally to submandibular nodes, whereas posterior buccal lesions metastasise to upper jugulodigastric lymph nodes:
• Small lesions can be excised transorally.
• Intermediate-stage primary tumours may be
resected transorally or through a lip-splitting
119
incision. With the exception of supercial lesions, the buccinator muscle should be resected in continuity to provide adequate margin depth.
• Adequate subcutaneous fat must be left behind to ensure viability of the skin, whenever onco­logically safe. Palpation must be done at every step to ensure the button hole of the buccal skin is not created.
• Local intraoral spread may necessitate resec­tion of the alveolar ridge of the mandible or maxilla. Deep invasion into the cheek may require through-and-through resection.
• Peroral: Small anterior lesions are accessible without an external incision. However a per­oral approach should be avoided in posterior lesions even if they are small. It is pertinent to resect an adequate base with wide margins as the base is the commonest site of compro­mised margins with peroral excision. Occasionally an anterior lesion requiring mar­ginal mandibulectomy can be approached perorally.
• Cheek ap: Most lesions of the buccal mucosa (with above exceptions) are approached via a cheek ap with straight lip split, angle split or McGregor incision.
• Midline lip split: When a lesion is located away from the oral commissure, the lip is split in the midline. This incision maintains better oral competence. The incision is continued over the mentum, curving towards the hyoid up to the mastoid process along a suitable skin crease at least two nger breadths below the mandible. The midline lip split incision can be modied for better cosmesis.
The wide variation in the presentation of the
lesion over the buccal mucosa is depicted in Figs.31, 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36.
3.1 Management oftheMandible
• Periosteum is a robust barrier to bone inva­sion. The mandible is generally invaded via its occlusal surface in alveolar lesions with intact dentition. In the retromolar trigone or in eden-
120
https://t.me/medicina_free
N. M. Nagarkar et al.
Fig. 31 Growth in the left buccal mucosa
Fig. 32 Hypertrophic leukoplakic patch in the right buc-
cal mucosa
tulous mandibles, the occlusal surface corre­sponds to the junction of the attached and reected mucosa (point of abutment).
• In irradiated mandibles and in large tumours, the mandible can be invaded at multiple points due to multiple breaks in the periosteum.
• With cancers of the oor of the mouth, the mandible is inltrated at the point of abut­ment. Hence a horizontal marginal mandibu­lectomy can be attempted in early gingivobuccal complex cancer lesions to include invasion at the occlusal surface; the oor of mouth cancer requires vertical or oblique marginal mandibulectomy to
Fig. 33 Verrucous growth in the left buccal mucosa
Fig. 34 Ulceroproliferative growth in the left buccal
mucosa
completely excise the lingual plate due to invasion occurring directly at the point of abutment.
Marginal mandibulectomy—Marginal man­dibulectomy is indicated when tumour abuts the mandible without gross invasion or when there is only supercial bony invasion (Figs.37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42):