Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5850_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
310
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. BaradaranRahimi and V. R. Askari
11. Wang L, Ma R, Liu C, Liu H, Zhu R, Guo S, etal. Salvia miltior­rhiza: a potential red light to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(7):1077–97.
12. An L, Zhou M, Marikar F, Hu XW, Miao QY, Li P, etal. Salvia miltiorrhiza lipophilic fraction attenuates oxidative stress in dia­betic nephropathy through activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2. Am J Chin Med. 2017;45(7):1441–57.
13. Zhang G, Cui G, Tong S, Cao QJACB.Salvianolic acid A allevi­ates the renal damage in rats with chronic renal failure. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(2):e201900204.
14. Zhang HF, Wang YL, Gao C, Gu YT, Huang J, Wang JH, et al. Salvianolic acid A attenuates kidney injury and inammation by inhibiting NF-κB and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018;39(12):1855–64.
15. Zhang HF, Wang JH, Wang YL, Gao C, Gu YT, Huang J, etal. Salvianolic acid A protects the kidney against oxidative stress by activating the Akt/GSK-3β/Nrf-2 signaling pathway and inhibit­ing the NF-κB signaling pathway in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:2853534.
16. Wang X, Qi D, Fu F, Li X, Liu Y, Ji K, et al. Therapeutic and antiproteinuric effects of salvianolic acid A in combined with low-dose prednisone in minimal change disease rats: involvement of PPARγ/Angptl4 and Nrf-2/HO-1 pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;858:172342.
17. Mai X, Yin X, Chen P, Zhang M. Salvianolic acid B protects against fatty acid-induced renal tubular injury via inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:574229.
18. Pang Y, Zhang PC, Lu RR, Li HL, Li JC, Fu HX, etal. Andrade­oliveira salvianolic acid B modulates caspase-1-mediated pyrop­tosis in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury via Nrf-2 pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:541426.
19. Hu Y, Wang M, Pan Y, Li Q, Xu L.Salvianolic acid B attenuates renal interstitial brosis by regulating the HPSE/SDC1 axis. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(2):1325–34.
20. Chen X, Wu R, Kong Y, Yang Y, Gao Y, Sun D, etal. Tanshinone II attenuates renal damage in STZ-induced diabetic rats via inhibiting oxidative stress and inammation. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):31915.
21. Xu S, He L, Ding K, Zhang L, Xu X, Wang S, etal. Tanshinone IIA ameliorates streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy, partly by attenuating PERK pathway-induced brosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:5773–82.
22. Liang R, Zhao Q, Jian G, Cheng D, Wang N, Zhang G, etal. Tanshinone IIA attenuates contrast-induced nephropathy via Nrf-2 activation in rats. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(6):2616–23.
23. Zhou Y, Jiang SM, Li L, Wang Y, Ding L, Liu CX, et al. Efcacy and safety of tanshinone for chronic kidney dis­ease: a meta- analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:3091814.
24. Xu J, Zhang C, Shi X, Li J, Liu M, Jiang W, et al. Efcacy and safety of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection on hyperten­sive nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1542.
25. Neag MA, Mocan A, Echeverría J, Pop RM, Bocsan CI, Crişan G, etal. Berberine: botanical occurrence, traditional uses, extraction methods, and relevance in cardiovascular, metabolic, hepatic, and renal disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:557.
26. Zhou M, Deng Y, Liu M, Liao L, Dai X, Guo C, etal. The pharma­cological activity of berberine, a review for liver protection. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;890:173655.
27. Wang FM, Yang YJ, Ma LL, Tian XJ, He YQ.Berberine ame­liorates renal interstitial brosis induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. Nephrology (Carlton). 2014;19(9):542–51.
28. Qin X, Zhao Y, Gong J, Huang W, Su H, Yuan F, et al. Berberine protects glomerular podocytes via inhibiting Drp1­mediated mitochondrial ssion and dysfunction. Theranostics. 2019;9(6):1698–713.
29. Zhang M, Zhang Y, Xiao D, Zhang J, Wang X, Guan F, et al. Highly bioavailable berberine formulation ameliorates dia­betic nephropathy through the inhibition of glomerular mesan­gial matrix expansion and the activation of autophagy. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;873:172955.
30. Li Z, Zhang W.Protective effect of berberine on renal brosis caused by diabetic nephropathy. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(2):1055–62.
31. Zhu L, Han J, Yuan R, Xue L, Pang W.Berberine ameliorates dia­betic nephropathy by inhibiting TLR-4/NF-κB pathway. Biol Res. 2018;51(1):9.
32. Ni WJ, Ding HH, Zhou H, Qiu YY, Tang LQ. Renoprotective effects of berberine through regulation of the MMPs/TIMPs sys­tem in streptozocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;764:448–56.
33. Guo Z, Sun H, Zhang H, Zhang Y. Anti-hypertensive and reno­protective effects of berberine in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37(4):332–9.
34. Tian H, Kang YM, Gao HL, Shi XL, Fu LY, Li Y, etal. Chronic infusion of berberine into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus attenuates hypertension and sympathoexcitation via the ROS/Erk1/2/iNOS pathway. Phytomedicine. 2019;52:216–24.
35. Dai P, Wang J, Lin L, Zhang Y, Wang Z.Renoprotective effects of berberine as adjuvant therapy for hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: evaluation via biochemical markers and color Doppler ultrasonography. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(3):869–76.
36. Li ZY, Liu B, Zhuang XJ, Shen YD, Tian HR, Ji Y, etal. [Effects of berberine on the serum cystatin C levels and urine albumin/ creatine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;98(46):3756–61.
37. Yücel Ç, Karatoprak G, Açıkara ÖB, Akkol EK, Barak TH, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, et al. Immunomodulatory and anti­inammatory therapeutic potential of gingerols and their nanofor­mulations. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:902551.
38. Yahyazadeh R, Baradaran Rahimi V, Yahyazadeh A, Mohajeri SA, Askari VR.Promising effects of gingerol against toxins: a review article. Biofactors. 2021;47(6):885–913.
39. Alipour A, Baradaran Rahimi V, Askari VR.Promising inuences of gingerols against metabolic syndrome: a mechanistic review. Biofactors. 2022;48(5):993–1004.
40. Al Hroob AM, Abukhalil MH, Alghonmeen RD, Mahmoud AM. Ginger alleviates hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress, inammation and apoptosis and protects rats against diabetic nephropathy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:381–9.
41. Fathi R, Akbari A, Nasiri K, Chardahcherik M.Ginger (Zingiber ofcinale roscoe) extract could upregulate the renal expression of NRF-2 and TNFα and prevents ethanol-induced toxicity in rat kid­ney. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2021;11(2):134–45.
42. Joshi D, Srivastav SK, Belemkar S, Dixit VA.Zingiber ofcinale and 6-gingerol alleviate liver and kidney dysfunctions and oxida­tive stress induced by mercuric chloride in male rats: a protective approach. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:645–55.
43. Reddy YA, Chalamaiah M, Ramesh B, Balaji G, Indira P. Ameliorating activity of ginger (Zingiber ofcinale) extract against lead induced renal toxicity in male rats. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51(5):908–14.
44. Han SJ, Kim M, D’Agati VD, Lee HT. 6-Shogaol protects against ischemic acute kidney injury by modulating NF-κB and heme oxygenase-1 pathways. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(3):F743–56.
45. Yi JK, Ryoo ZY, Ha JJ, Oh DY, Kim MO, Kim SH.Benecial effects of 6-shogaol on hyperglycemia, islet morphology and apoptosis in some tissues of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:15.
46. Gwon MG, Gu H, Leem J, Park KK.Protective effects of 6-shogaol, an active compound of ginger, in a murine model of cisplatin­induced acute kidney injury. Molecules. 2021;26(19):5931.
Role ofHerbal Medicines fortheTreatment ofChronic Kidney Disease
https://t.me/medicina_free
311
47. Almatroodi SA, Alnuqaydan AM, Babiker AY, Almogbel MA, Khan AA, Husain Rahmani A. 6-Gingerol, a bioactive compound of ginger attenuates renal damage in streptozotocin-induced dia­betic rats by regulating the oxidative stress and inammation. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(3):317.
48. Hegazy AM, Mosaed MM, Elshafey SH, Bayomy NA. 6-Gingerol ameliorates gentamicin induced renal cortex oxida­tive stress and apoptosis in adult male albino rats. Tissue Cell. 2016;48(3):208–16.
49. Salihu M, Ajayi BO, Adedara IA, Farombi EO. 6-Gingerol-rich fraction from Zingiber ofcinale prevents hematotoxicity and oxi­dative damage in kidney and liver of rats exposed to Carbendazim. J Diet Suppl. 2016;13(4):433–48.
50. Imani H, Tabibi H, Naja I, Atabak S, Hedayati M, Rahmani L. Effects of ginger on serum glucose, advanced glycation end products, and inammation in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nutrition. 2015;31(5):703–7.
51. Ghadiri M, Baradaran Rahimi V, Moradi E, Hasanpour M, Clark CCT, Iranshahi M, etal. Standardised pomegranate peel extract lavage prevents postoperative peritoneal adhesion by regulating TGF-β and VEGF levels. Inammopharmacology. 2021;29(3):855–68.
52. Rakhshandeh H, Baradaran Rahimi V, Habibi Z, Sirousi Z, Askari VR.Punica granatum seed oil detracts peritoneal adhesion: perus­ing anti-oxidant, anti-inammatory, anti-brotic, and antiangio­genic impacts. Physiol Rep. 2022;10(24):e15545.
53. Rahimi VB, Askari VR, Mousavi SH.Ellagic acid dose and time­dependently abrogates d-galactose-induced animal model of aging: investigating the role of PPAR-γ. Life Sci. 2019;232:116595.
54. Baradaran Rahimi V, Ghadiri M, Ramezani M, Askari VR.Antiinammatory and anticancer activities of pomegranate and its constituent, ellagic acid: evidence from cellular, animal, and clinical studies. Phytother Res. 2020;34(4):685–720.
55. Ankita P, Deepti B, Nilam M.Flavonoid rich fraction of Punica granatum improves early diabetic nephropathy by ameliorating proteinuria and disturbed glucose homeostasis in experimental animals. Pharm Biol. 2015;53(1):61–71.
56. Mestry SN, Dhodi JB, Kumbhar SB, Juvekar AR.Attenuation of diabetic nephropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by Punica granatum Linn. leaves extract. J Tradit Complement Med. 2017;7(3):273–80.
57. Mestry SN, Gawali NB, Pai SA, Gursahani MS, Dhodi JB, Munshi R, etal. Punica granatum improves renal function in gentamicin­induced nephropathy in rats via attenuation of oxidative stress. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(1):16–23.
58. El Bohi KM, Abdel-Motal SM, Khalil SR, Abd-Elaal MM, Metwally MMM, ELhady WM. The efciency of pomegran­ate (Punica granatum) peel ethanolic extract in attenuating the vancomycin- triggered liver and kidney tissues injury in rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(6):7134–50.
59. Abdel Moneim AE, El-Khadragy MF. The potential effects of pomegranate (Punica granatum) juice on carbon tetrachloride­induced nephrotoxicity in rats. J Physiol Biochem. 2013;69(3):359–70.
60. Zhou B, Li Q, Wang J, Chen P, Jiang S. Ellagic acid attenuates streptozocin induced diabetic nephropathy via the regulation of oxidative stress and inammatory signaling. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;123:16–27.
61. Mehrzadi S, Fatemi I, Malayeri AR, Khodadadi A, Mohammadi F, Mansouri E, etal. Ellagic acid mitigates sodium arsenite-induced renal and hepatic toxicity in male Wistar rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2018;70(4):712–9.
62. Chen S, Zhou M, Ying X, Zhou C.Ellagic acid protects rats from chronic renal failure via MiR-182/FOXO3a axis. Mol Immunol. 2021;138:150–60.
63. Liu Q, Liang X, Liang M, Qin R, Qin F, Wang X.Ellagic acid ame­liorates renal ischemic-reperfusion injury through NOX4/JAK/ STAT signaling pathway. Inammation. 2020;43(1):298–309.
64. Aslan A, Gok O, Beyaz S, Ağca CA, Erman O, Zerek A.Ellagic acid prevents kidney injury and oxidative damage via regulation of Nrf-2/NF-κB signaling in carbon tetrachloride induced rats. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(10):7959–70.
65. Saeed ZM, Khattab MI, Khorshid NE, Salem AE.Ellagic acid and cilostazol ameliorate amikacin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats by downregulating oxidative stress, inammation, and apoptosis. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0271591.
66. Martin ME, Grao-Cruces E, Millan-Linares MC, Montserrat-de la Paz S.Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) seed oil: a functional food from the winemaking industry. Foods. 2020;9(10):1360.
67. Gao Z, Liu G, Hu Z, Shi W, Chen B, Zou P, etal. Grape seed proanthocyanidins protect against streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy by attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(2):1447–54.
68. Ding Y, Li H, Li Y, Liu D, Zhang L, Wang T, etal. Protective effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on the kidneys of dia­betic rats through the Nrf-2 signalling pathway. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:5205903.
69. Yousef MI, Khalil D, Abdou HM.Neuro- and nephroprotective effect of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract against carboplatin and thalidomide through modulation of inammation, tumor sup­pressor protein p53, neurotransmitters, oxidative stress and histol­ogy. Toxicol Rep. 2018;5:568–78.
70. Abdelsalam HM, Samak MA, Alsemeh AE.Synergistic therapeu­tic effects of Vitis vinifera extract and silymarin on experimentally induced cardiorenal injury: the pertinent role of Nrf-2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;110:37–46.
71. Eid RA, Zaki MSA, Al-Shraim M, Eldeen MA, Haidara MA. Grape seed extract protects against amiodarone-induced nephrotoxicity and ultrastructural alterations associated with the inhibition of biomarkers of inammation and oxidative stress in rats. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2021;45(1):49–58.
72. Turki K, Charradi K, Boukhalfa H, Belhaj M, Limam F, Aouani E.Grape seed powder improves renal failure of chronic kidney disease patients. EXCLI J. 2016;15:424–33.
73. Fuloria S, Mehta J, Chandel A, Sekar M, Rani N, Begum MY, et al. A comprehensive review on the therapeutic potential of Curcuma longa Linn. in relation to its major active constituent curcumin. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:820806.
74. Dastani M, Rahimi HR, Askari VR, Jaafari MR, Jarahi L, Yadollahi A, etal. Three months of combination therapy with nano-curcumin reduces the inammation and lipoprotein (a) in type 2 diabetic patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease: evidence of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo- controlled clinical trial. Biofactors. 2022;49:108.
75. Russo ER, Facincani I, Nakazato KC, Coimbra TM, Crevelin EJ, Pereira AMS, etal. Oral administration of powdered dried rhi­zomes of Curcuma longa L. (turmeric, Zingiberaceae) is effec­tive in the treatment of doxorubicin-induced kidney injury in rats. Phytother Res. 2018;32(12):2408–16.
76. Fan HY, Wang XK, Li X, Ji K, Du SH, Liu Y, etal. Curcumin, as a pleiotropic agent, improves doxorubicin-induced nephrotic syn­drome in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;250:112502.
77. Xu G, Gu Y, Yan N, Li Y, Sun L, Li B. Curcumin functions as an anti-inammatory and anti-oxidant agent on arsenic-induced hepatic and kidney injury by inhibiting MAPKs/NF-κB and acti­vating Nrf-2 pathways. Environ Toxicol. 2021;36(11):2161–73.
78. Cao L, Zhi D, Han J, Kumar Sah S, Xie Y.Combinational effect of curcumin and metformin against gentamicin-induced nephro­toxicity: involvement of antioxidative, anti-inammatory and anti­apoptotic pathway. J Food Biochem. 2019;43(7):e12836.
312
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. BaradaranRahimi and V. R. Askari
79. Chen Y, Li C, Duan S, Yuan X, Liang J, Hou S.Curcumin atten­uates potassium oxonate-induced hyperuricemia and kidney inammation in mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109195.
80. Di Tu Q, Jin J, Hu X, Ren Y, Zhao L, He Q.Curcumin improves the renal autophagy in rat experimental membranous nephropathy via regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Nrf-2/HO-1 signaling pathways. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:7069052.
81. Soetikno V, Sari SDP, Ul Maknun L, Sumbung NK, Rahmi DNI, Pandhita BAW, et al. Pre-treatment with curcumin ameliorates cisplatin- induced kidney damage by suppressing kidney inam­mation and apoptosis in rats. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2019;69(2):75–82.
82. Alvarenga L, Salarolli R, Cardozo L, Santos RS, de Brito JS, Kemp JA, etal. Impact of curcumin supplementation on expres­sion of inammatory transcription factors in hemodialysis patients: a pilot randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(12):3594–600.
83. Rodrigues HCN, Martins TFP, Santana N, Braga CC, Silva MAC, Cunha LCD, etal. Anti-oxidant and anti-inammatory response to curcumin supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a random­ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;44:136–42.
84. Jiménez-Osorio AS, García-Niño WR, González-Reyes S, Álvarez-Mejía AE, Guerra-León S, Salazar-Segovia J, etal. The effect of dietary supplementation with curcumin on redox sta­tus and Nrf-2 activation in patients with nondiabetic or diabetic proteinuric chronic kidney disease: a pilot study. J Ren Nutr. 2016;26(4):237–44.
85. Pivari F, Mingione A, Piazzini G, Ceccarani C, Ottaviano E, Brasacchio C, et al. Curcumin supplementation (Meriva(®)) modulates inammation, lipid peroxidation and gut microbiota composition in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2022;14(1):231.
86. Jie Z, Chao M, Jun A, Wei S, LiFeng M.Effect of curcumin on diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:6109406.
87. Emami E, Heidari-Soureshjani S, Sherwin CM.Anti-inammatory response to curcumin supplementation in chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2022;12(6):576–88.
88. Futuhi F, Naghibzadeh Tahami A, Azmandian J, Saber A. The effects of curcumin-containing supplementations on inammatory markers and lipid proles in patients with chronic kidney diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Complement Integr Med. 2022;19(3):531–41.
89. Mokhtari-Zaer A, Norouzi F, Askari VR, Khazdair MR, Roshan NM, Boskabady M, etal. The protective effect of Nigella sativa extract on lung inammation and oxidative stress induced by lipo­polysaccharide in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;253:112653.
90. Hosseini A, Baradaran Rahimi V, Rakhshandeh H, Askari VR. Nigella sativa oil reduces LPS-induced microglial inam­mation: an evaluation on M(1)/M(2) balance. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:5639226.
91. Yimer EM, Tuem KB, Karim A, Ur-Rehman N, Anwar F.Nigella sativa L. (black cumin): a promising natural remedy for wide range of illnesses. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019;2019:1528635.
92. Hosseinian S, Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan A, Shafei MN, Sadeghnia HR, Soukhtanloo M, Shahraki S, etal. Nigella sativa extract is a potent therapeutic agent for renal inammation, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in a rat model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Phytother Res. 2018;32(11):2290–8.
93. Alkis H, Demir E, Taysi MR, Sagir S, Taysi S.Effects of Nigella sativa oil and thymoquinone on radiation-induced oxidative stress in kidney tissue of rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;139:111540.
94. Farooqui Z, Shahid F, Khan AA, Khan F.Oral administration of Nigella sativa oil and thymoquinone attenuates long term cispla­tin treatment induced toxicity and oxidative damage in rat kidney. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:912–23.
95. Hosseinian S, Hadjzadeh MA, Roshan NM, Khazaei M, Shahraki S, Mohebbati R, et al. Renoprotective effect of Nigella sativa against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and oxidative stress in rat. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2018;29(1):19–29.
96. Alam MA, Nasiruddin M, Haque SF, Khan RA.Evaluation of safety and efcacy prole of Nigella sativa oil as an add-on ther­apy, in addition to alpha-keto analogue of essential amino acids in patients with chronic kidney disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2020;31(1):21–31.
97. Razmpoosh E, Sa S, Abdollahi N, Nadjarzadeh A, Nazari M, Fallahzadeh H, et al. The effect of Nigella sativa on the mea­sures of liver and kidney parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Pharmacol Res. 2020;156:104767.
98. Roohbakhsh Y, Baradaran Rahimi V, Silakhori S, Rajabi H, Rahmanian-Devin P, Samzadeh-Kermani A, etal. Evaluation of the effects of peritoneal lavage with Rosmarinus ofcinalis extract against the prevention of postsurgical-induced peritoneal adhe­sion. Planta Med. 2020;86(6):405–14.
99. Farhadi F, Baradaran Rahimi V, Mohamadi N, Askari VR.Effects of rosmarinic acid, carnosic acid, rosmanol, carnosol, and urso­lic acid on the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases. Biofactors. 2022;49:478.
100. Hamed H, Boulila S, Ghrab F, Kallel R, Boudawara T, El Feki A.The preventive effect of aqueous extract of Rosemary (Rosmarinus ofcinalis) leaves against the nephrotoxic­ity of carbon tetrachloride in mice. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2020;126(3):201–8.
101. Hassanen NHM, Fahmi A, Shams-Eldin E, Abdur-Rahman M.Protective effect of rosemary (Rosmarinus ofcinalis) against diethylnitrosamine-induced renal injury in rats. Biomarkers. 2020;25(3):281–9.
102. El-Demerdash FM, El-Sayed RA, Abdel-Daim MM.Rosmarinus ofcinalis essential oil modulates renal toxicity and oxidative stress induced by potassium dichromate in rats. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2021;67:126791.
103. Xiang Y, Ji M, Wu L, Lv L, Liang Q, Deng R, etal. Rosmarinic acid prevents cisplatin-induced liver and kidney injury by inhib­iting inammatory responses and enhancing total anti-oxi­dant capacity, thereby activating the Nrf-2 signaling pathway. Molecules. 2022;27(22):7815.
104. Abduh MS, Alruhaimi RS, Alqhtani HA, Hussein OE, Abukhalil MH, Kamel EM, etal. Rosmarinic acid mitigates chlorpyrifos­induced oxidative stress, inammation, and kidney injury in rats by modulating SIRT1 and Nrf-2/HO-1 signaling. Life Sci. 2023;313:121281.
105. Khalaf AA, Hassanen EI, Ibrahim MA, Tohamy AF, Aboseada MA, Hassan HM, et al. Rosmarinic acid attenuates chromium­induced hepatic and renal oxidative damage and DNA damage in rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2020;34(11):e22579.
106. Joardar S, Dewanjee S, Bhowmick S, Dua TK, Das S, Saha A, etal. Rosmarinic acid attenuates cadmium-induced nephrotoxic­ity via inhibition of oxidative stress, apoptosis, inammation and brosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8):2027.
Herbal Medicines fortheManagement
https://t.me/medicina_free
ofIrritable Bowel Syndrome andConstipation Problem
EswaraRaoPuppala, NeethuPrasad, MeenakshiSingh, ArunN.Prakash, MdAbubakar, PriyankaAdhikari, andV.G.M.Naidu
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a serious digestive disorder, which is mainly of two forms ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). IBS is characterised by abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea, and constipation periods. Among these constipation is accompanied by a number of bowel symptoms including difculty passing stool, hard stool, and inadequate evacuation sensations. Although the aetiology is unknown, it is widely thought that diet and microbiota contribute to the development of IBS. By targeting the various aetiological factors, medical treatment aims to control the symptoms. Due to the multifactorial causes of these disorders, unimpres­sive results from conventional IBS medications, the economic burden for patients and pharmacologic effects, the treatment of IBS and constipation is chal­lenging and the use of complementary and alternative medicines, especially herbal therapies is increasing. Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) for
IBS and related disorders include hypnosis, acupunc­ture, cognitive behaviour therapy, yoga, faecal micro­biota transplantation, and nutritional supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, and herbal medicine. The practice of prescribing herbal medications for a variety of gastrointestinal disorders has a long history in vari­ous parts of the world. Herbal medications have the potential to target multiple organs and have exhibited efcacy for UC and CD in experimental models and clinical trials by maintaining the epithelial integrity barrier, regulating macrophage activation, and modulat­ing the immune response. In this chapter, the author investigates the efcacy of herbal medicines in the man­agement of irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, and related disorders.
Keywords
Lifestyle diseases · Constipation · Herbal medicines
Eswara Rao Puppala and Neethu Prasad contributed equally with all other contributors.
E. R. Puppala · P. Adhikari University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
N. Prasad · A. N. Prakash · V. G. M. Naidu (*) Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical and Research (NIPER)-Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India e-mail: vgmnaidu@niperguwahati.ac.in
M. Singh Centre for GMP Extraction Facility, Sponsored by Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 A. K. Dhara, S. C. Mandal (eds.), Role of Herbal Medicines, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7703-1_16
M. Abubakar Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical and Research (NIPER)-Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)-Hajipur, Hajipur, Bihar, India
313
314
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Puppala et al.
Abbreviations
ATF4 Activating transcription factor 4 ATG5 Autophagy related 5 Bcl-2 B-cell lymphoma 2 CAM Complementary and alternative medicine CAT Catalase CCR2 C-C chemokine receptor type 2 CD Crohn’s disease CD4 Clusters of differentiation 4 CDX-2 Caudal Type Homeobox 2 CHOP C/EBP homologous protein CINC-3 Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattrac-
tant 3 COX2 Cyclooxygenase-2 DAI Disease activity index DAPI 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole DCFDA 2′,7′-Dichlorouorescein diacetate DIM Diindolylmethane DSS Dextran sodium sulphate DSS Dextran sulfate sodium FFAs Free fatty acids FOXP3 Forkhead box P3 GBF Germinated barley foodstuff GLUT1 Glucose transporter 1 GOS Glucooligosaccharide GSH Glutathione GSH/GSH-Px Glutathione peroxidase GSH-Rd Glutathione reductase GSK-3 Glycogen synthase kinase 3 H&E Haematoxylin–eosin H3K9me3 Histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation HO-1 Haeme oxygenase-1 HP Haptoglobin IBD Inammatory bowel disease ICAM-1 Colonic intercellular adhesion molecule-1 IFN-γ Interferon gamma IgA Immunoglobulin A IL-1β Interleukin 1 beta IL-6 Interleukin 6 ISAPP International Scientic Association for
Probiotics and Prebiotics JNK c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase JNKs c-Jun N-terminal kinases LPS Lipopolysaccharide MCP-1 Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 MD Molecular dynamics MDA Malondialdehyde MIP-2 Macrophage inammatory protein MLNs Mesentric lymph nodes MMPs Matrix metalloproteases MPO Myeloperoxidase mRNA Messenger RNA
Msi-1 Musashi RNA binding protein 1 mTOR Mammalian target of rapamycin MyD88 Myeloid differentiation primary response
88 NCI National Cancer Institute NF-κB Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer
of activated B cells NO Nitric oxide Nrf2 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 PAR2 Protease activated receptor 2 PERK Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticu-
lum kinase PGE2 Prostaglandin E2 PHF Poly herbal formulation PI3k Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase PKB Protein kinase B p-NF-κB Phosphorylated nuclear factor kappa-light-
chain-enhancer of activated B cells QRZSLXF Qing Re Zao Shi Liang Xue receipt RIPA Radio-immunoprecipitation assay RORγ RAR-related orphan receptor gamma ROS Reactive oxygen species SCFA Short chain fatty acids SHD Sanhuangshu’ai decoction SIRT1 Sirtuin 1 smad Suppressor of mothers against
decapentaplegic SOC-1 Suppressor of cytokine signalling 1 SOD Superoxide dismutase STAT Signal transducer and activator of
transcription TBARS Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances TF Transcription factor Th1 Type 1 T helper Th17 Type 17 T helper TNBS Trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid TNF-α Tumor necrosis factor alpha UC Ulcerative colitis ULK Unc-51-like kinase 1 Wnt Wingless-related integration site ZO-1 Zonula occludens ZWBQD Zhen-Wu-Bu-Qi Decoction.
1 Introduction
Inammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) or inammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing inammation of the gas­trointestinal tract (GIT) resulting from a dysregulated immune response and was initially reported as a rare case in the Western world. Since then, their numbers and geographic distribution have progressively grown, and they are now rec­ognised on a global scale. Wilks described ulcerative colitis
Herbal Medicines fortheManagement ofIrritable Bowel Syndrome andConstipation Problem
https://t.me/medicina_free
315
(UC) as a distinct pathological condition along with Moxon in 1875. Later, Dr. Crohn and two colleagues submitted an essay on the disorder “Terminal Ileitis” to the American Medical Association in May 1932, in which they detailed the symptoms of Crohn’s disease (CD) [1]. These two main types of IBD share similar pathogenesis and both are charac­terised by a protracted inammatory state. However, they differ considerably in characteristics such as location, the involvement of layers in the intestine, and clinical complica­tions [2].
In UC, mucosal inammation with ulceration extends continuously from the rectum to the proximal part of the colon and the main symptoms include bloody diarrhoea, abdominal pain, urgency, rectal bleeding, fever, and tenes­mus [3]. The sub-acute stage of the disease is marked by mural thickening and luminal narrowing. Chronic UC is characterised by rectal constriction and broadening of the presacral region. On the other hand, any part of the digestive system can be damaged by Crohn’s disease, but the proximal colon and terminal ileum are the most frequently affected [4] (see Fig.1). Focused inammation, aphthoid ulceration, and nearby cobble-stoning are the hallmarks of the acute Crohn’s disease. The chronic phase of CD is accompanied by trans­mural brosis and cicatrisation along with perianal disease in most of the patients. Like UC, patients might go through periods of are-ups and remission with symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhoea, fever, anal ssures, and rectal bleeding [5].
The intestinal epithelium functions as a barrier to prevent the inversion of antigens. The defective regulation of tight junctions increases permeability and thereby the uptake of antigens causes inammation as an immuno-protective mechanism [6]. The aetiology of IBD is still poorly known. Many factors, including genetic, immunological, gut micro­biome, and environmental including nutrition, stress, and free radicals, may contribute to the onset of IBD [7]. An irregular immune system increases the production of cyto-
kines and chemokines that activate cellular or humoral responses and exacerbate IBD progression by disrupting homeostasis and persistently stimulating the local immune response in the intestine [8]. Generally, the gut immune sys­tem maintains a commensal relationship with the microbi­ome and shows tolerance to dietary antigens. However, aberrant immunological reactions to commensal non­pathogenic microorganisms lead to dysbiosis in the GIT. In IBD pathogenesis environmental factors play an important inuence that is one of the least understood and most chal­lenging to address. Based on the proportionally rising inci­dence of IBD in the industrialised nations and the emergence of new feeding behaviours in these regions over the past few decades, numerous studies have emphasised the probable aetiological role played by the diet [9].
IBD was previously widely reported in Europe, North America, and Australia. But now it has a much wider geo­graphic distribution and is becoming more common even in nations that were previously thought to be low-risk zones. Two population-based studies in Haryana and Punjab of India reported a prevalence rate of 42.8/100,000 and
44.3/100,000 [10]. Additionally, hospital-based studies indi­cated a higher incidence of IBD in the southern states of India. Urbanisation, nutritional shifts such as the Westernisation of the Indian cuisine, improvements in envi­ronmental and hygienic conditions, as well as underlying genetic predispositions have all certainly contributed to a rise in the incidence of IBD.One modelling study from Iran predicted a 1.5-fold increase in prevalence for East Asia with
4.5 million cases of IBD and quadrupling of the occurrence for India with 2.2 million cases of IBD in 2035, as compared to 2020 [11].
Regrettably, there is little hope for a complete cure for CD and UC either through medical nor surgical treatment. Approximately 10–20% patients experience relapses and recurring symptoms. Medical treatment mostly addresses symptoms of IBD and aims to treat abdominal pain; infec-
Fig. 1 Schematic representation showing the differences between the two main forms of inammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease, and ulcerative colitis, in terms of their location and the pattern of the affected areas (red-coloured) in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT)
316
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Puppala et al.
tion; diarrhoea; and deciencies in proteins, electrolytes, and vitamins. Medical treatments in allopathic medicine include intestinal antibiotics, anti-diarrhoea medications, steroids, immunomodulatory medicines, and surgery [12]. However, these treatments merely manage the disease’s episodes; they do not provide long-term treatment. Additionally, a number of adverse effects are there for these modern drugs. Steroids can damage CNS and can produce diseases like cardiovascu­lar disease, infertility, renal disease, and liver disease. Long intake of antibiotics has detrimental consequences on the digestive system. Surgery can be performed to treat compli­cations rather than to treat the disease and relapse is still a possibility even after surgery [13].
In the modern era, Ayurveda is a good IBD therapy option.
As per Ayurveda, Crohn’s disease is specically considered as Vatikagrahani” and ulcerative colitis as ‟PittajaGrahani. According to Ayurveda, perfect health exists when the three basic energies (doshas: Vata, Pitta, and Kapha) are in har­mony [14]. The underlying cause of IBD lies within the pro­cess of digestion, supported by a healthy lifestyle and right quantity of food [15]. Ayurveda treatment is essential and has been shown to be successful in alleviating the symptoms of IBD.Ayurveda uses both allopathic and ayurvedic criteria to assess the severity of the IBD condition. Internal medica­tions (ShamanaChikitsa), Panchakarma therapy (ShodanaChikitsa), dietary restrictions, and lifestyle changes are all part of the treatment. Panchakarma therapy is crucial in more severe cases as it swiftly detoxies and regenerates the digestive system, reduces inammation, ceases rectal bleeding, and cures ulcerations [16]. Overall health and digestion of the patients are improved by several herbal treat­ments, which also help to keep these conditions under con­trol. There are several plants, including Bilva (Aegle
marmelos), Vacha (Acorus calamus), Giloy (Tinospora cor- difolia), Vaividang (Emblicaribes), Mulethi (Liquorice root), Daruharidra (Berberis aristata), Kutaj (Holarrhena anti­dysenterica), and Mustak (Cyperus rotundus) that have anti-
inammatory, anti-microbial, and anti-oxidant properties [14]. Thus, lifestyle management through the use of mindful­ness techniques promotes overall health once the disease has been put into remission by taking these herbal medicines [17].
Constipation is another very common medical condition worldwide, negatively affecting patient’s quality of life and health-care system. It is accompanied by nausea, anorexia, and discomfort. Moreover, it may result in extra-intestinal symptoms such as headaches, bad breath, restlessness, and confusion. Collectively, these symptoms signicantly lower the patients’ quality of life. It is reported that 12–19% of Americans and 14% of Asians suffer from constipation, with symptoms varying by geographic location. Pharmacologic agents for constipation include mainly laxatives, but many patients are dissatised with these due to ineffectiveness,
inconsistent results, and safety-related or adverse-effect con­cerns and are interested in other treatment options and com­plementary/alternative therapies. Three often used herbal remedies for achieving regular bowel movements are rhu­barb, senna leaf, and aloe. In addition, rhubarb is a signi­cant component of MaZiRenWan, a Chinese medicine formulation occasionally used in eastern nations to treat constipation.
2 Unravelling theAetiopathogenesis
Even though the exact pathogenesis of IBS remains obscure, it is generally believed that the disease is caused by cross­talk between the host immune system and the gut microbiota, along with genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and socio-economic development. The causes of constipa­tion are mainly three: lifestyle related, disease related, and drug induced. A diet low in both soluble and insoluble bre, inadequate daily intake of uids, lack of physical activity, routine changes, age, and certain drugs are all common causes of constipation. Research on the pathogenesis of IBS and constipation has increasingly relied on the gut microbi­ota in the past few decades [18]. It should be noted that sev­eral IBS drugs, especially antibiotics have been suspected of affecting either the metabolic stability of intestinal cells or the metabolism of gut microbiota. Numerous investigations have revealed alterations in the gut ora in patients having CD, UC, and constipation demonstrating the momentous role of gut microbiota in intestinal homeostasis [7].
2.1 A Healthy Gut Microbiota andIts Role
The “gut microbiota”, a population of more than 100 trillion microorganisms comprising bacteria, virus, archaea, and eukaryote that inhabit the GI tract has a signicant impact on the shaping and maturation of the immune system [19]. The majority of the GI tract is composed of bacteria, both useful bacteria “commensals” and opportunistic harmful bacteria “pathobionts” [20]. The prevailing consensus is that the development of the microbiota is a lifetime process that begins at birth and changes erratically with age and in response to environmental changes. Additionally, each per­son’s pace of change in the composition of the microbial population differs and there is no one-size-ts-all recipe for a healthy microbiome [21].
majority of the healthy gut microbiota, followed by the phyla Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia [22]. While virome primarily resides in the
ofIBS andConstipation
inHuman Health
Altogether, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes make up the
Herbal Medicines fortheManagement ofIrritable Bowel Syndrome andConstipation Problem
https://t.me/medicina_free
317
form of bacteriophages, the most frequent fungal genera that cohabit with bacteria in the gut are Aspergillus, Bullera,
Candida, Galactomyces, Penicillium, Pleospora, Rhodotorula, Sclerotinia, Saccharomyces, and Trametes.
Nearly 96% of healthy people possess archaea mainly, Methanobrevibacter smithii in their GI microbiota, which generates methane from the hydrogen produced by bacterial catabolism [23].
The gut microbiota delivers a number of promising ben­ets to the host, among which the most signicant roles in maintaining the integrity of the mucosal barrier, supplying nutrients like vitamins, and mitigation of infections [24]. Gut bacteria involves in the breakdown and absorption of bile acids, urea, sterols, essential vitamins, xenobiotics, plant­based polysaccharides, and some amino acids [25]. The sub­sequent metabolites are SCFAs like propionate, butyrate, and acetate which regulate functions including altering intersti­tial epithelial cell signalling, gene expression, chemotaxis, differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. Firmicutes are involved in butyrate production and Bacteroidetes phylum can produce propionate [26]. Butyrate, a primary energy source for colon epithelial cells and a regulator of mucin secretion, helps to maintain intestinal homeostasis, by keep­ing the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier and con­trolling the immunological response. Acetate and propionate, on the other hand, serve as substrates for the processes of lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis [27]. The GI microbiota is also vital for the de novo synthesis of essential vitamins which the host is unable to generate, such as riboavin, vita­min K, biotin, nicotinic acid, pyridoxine, pantothenic acid, and thiamine [28]. Vitamin B12 is mostly produced by lactic acid bacteria, and folate, a vitamin essential for the creation and repair of host DNA, is primarily produced by bidobac­teria [19]. Gut microbiota interacts with innate immunity and adaptive immunity in an extensive bidirectional manner and the interaction site is the intestinal barrier which requires the interplay of multiple components: interstitial epithelial cells (IECs), the gut microbiota, and mucosal and submucosal immune cells [29]. IECs serve as innate immunity mediators under normal physiological circumstances. IECs express cell-surface and intracellular pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors, respectively, just like other cell types. Intestinal homeostasis depends on the immune response, which is activated as a result of gut microorganisms stimulating PRRs [30].
2.2 Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis inIBS
andRelated Disorders
Numerous studies have revealed the fact that many risk vari­ables for IBS contribute to the host–microbe interactions that lead to the severe imbalance of gut microbiota which is a key
feature of IBS (i.e. dysbiosis) [31]. Dysbiosis occurs when the microbiota is unable to provide the host with all of its advantageous traits. Usually, various factors can contribute to inammation in IBS. The imbalance of commensal to pathogenic microbiota may cause an excessive amount of pro-inammatory chemicals to be produced, which exacer­bates intestinal inammation [7, 32] (Fig.2).
The gut microbiota of IBS patients exhibits decreased microbial diversity, less prevalence of the Firmicutes phy­lum, particularly F. prausnitzii, one of the most prominent bacterial species in the GI tract, and decreased abundance of Bacteroidetes phylum [7]. A decreased population of muco­lytic bacteria such as Akkermansiamuciniphila increase­ingthe abundance of mucin-degrading bacteria such as Ruminococcusgnavus and decreasing the presence of butyr­ate producers (e.g. Blautia, Lachnospiraceae, Roseburia, and Eubacterium rectale) were also observed in CD and UC patients [33]. Distortions in the epithelial barrier’s integrity can enhance the uptake of luminal antigens, which in turn can cause inammation. Additionally, IBS may be brought on by a decrease in mucin production driven by the destruc­tion of goblet cells and malfunctioning of epithelial cell tight junctions [6]. This supports the key role of dysbiosis in IBS development. Recent studies have found that germ-free mice (decient in the gut microbiota) which received intestinal microbiota transplantation from IBS individuals exhibit an exacerbation in the severity of colitis induction compared with the healthy population [34]. Even though it is proven that faecal microbiota transplantation effectively treats IBS, its safety is yet unknown. Variations in nutrient sources, oxy­gen levels, luminal pH, and the proliferation of different bac­terial species can all be altered by inammation and have an impact on the bacterial population’s equilibrium [35]. The representative gut microbiota alterations and interactions with host cells seen in IBS patients are listed in Table1.
2.3 Association ofPathobionts andPRRs
inIBS
Pathobionts are bacteria that are typically present in the intestines but can become pathogenic when certain endoge­nous and exogenous triggers alter the gut microbiota’s func­tion in the emergence of pathological diseases. Virulent E.
coli strains, Helicobacter species, Klebsiella species, Campylobacter concisus, and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis are some of the pathobionts. By dis-
rupting the intestinal barrier and regulating inammatory reactions, these bacteria promote inammation [32].
Intestinal epithelial cells are involved in pathobiont inter­actions, which can be direct (via adhesion and translocation) or indirect (by the modication of epithelial cell activities). Pathobionts can also interfere with the proper growth and
318
https://t.me/medicina_free
E. R. Puppala et al.
Fig. 2 Dysbiotic interaction in IBS and related disorders. In healthy state, commensal bacteria performs functions which are benecial to the host. To maintain the homeostasis of the intestinal tract, certain bac­teria produce SCFAs like butyrate. The intact mucus layer and antimi­crobial peptides produced by paneth cells stop bacteria from penetrating the epithelial layer. SCFAs help in maintaining the epithelial barrier, and also promote the production of anti-inammatory cytokines through facilitating the regulatory T cells (Treg) and effector T cells (Teff). Contrarily, in IBS patients, the decrease in commensal bacteria, including those that produce SCFAs, leads to imbalance of Treg and Teff cells which further increases the production of pro-inammatory
function of intestinal epithelial cells. For instance, pathobi­onts like Enterobacteriaceae faecalis can adhere to and move through monolayers of epithelial cells, while C. conci- sus can cause apoptosis in the same monolayers of epithelial cells. In addition, pathobionts may continue to trigger inam­mation long after infection by increasing pro-inammatory signalling in intestinal epithelial cells which might result in dysbiosis and colitis. C. difcile is one of the notable patho­bionts which is associated with nosocomial infections that induce mild to severe pseudomembranous colitis. Usually, a healthy microbiome offers resistance against C. difcile pathogenicity [51]. However, a dysbiotic microbiota is what fuels the growth of this bacteria and ensuing disease pathol­ogy. The pathogenesis of C. difcile pathobionts begins with the germination of its spores into vegetative cells, which multiply in the GI tract and release toxins that break the intestinal epithelial barrier to cause severe pseudomembra­nous colitis [52]. IBS-associated E. coli is also a signicant factor in the aetiology of IBS and may contribute to disease relapses in IBS patients [53]. Pathobiont bacteria suppress
cytokines. As a result, the mucosal layer is disrupted resulting in the invasion of bacteria. The mucosal layer is then damaged, allowing bac­teria to invade and prompting an inammatory cascade to combat the invasive bacteria. Moreover, pathobionts and commensal bacteria that could exhibit pathogenic traits under the appropriate circumstances, arise and proliferate in inammatory conditions. As a result, the modi­ed pathobionts survive, further limiting the growth of commensal organisms. The reduction of commensals, the growth of pathobionts, and an imbalance in immune regulation lead to a chronic inammatory condition
the expression of tight junction proteins and enhance mislocalisation, cause dysregulation of apoptosis and prolif­eration, and enhance ER stress and pro-inammatory signal­ling. These effects result in the development of dysbiosis and facilitate inammatory signalling following infection. In contrast, commensal bacteria provide mucosal health by enhancing mucin and IgA secretion, bolstering barrier integ­rity, pro-inammatory responses and apoptosis, and facilitat­ing commensal colonisation. These actions prolong inammatory signalling after infection and aid in the devel­opment of symbiosis [54].
Pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-like recep­tors are capable of detecting a wide variety of microbes and their metabolites and can exert both pro- and anti­inammatory actions. During infections, cells express these PRRs more intensely and produce more pro-inammatory mediators. PRRs can activate specic T-cell phenotypes; for example, few Clostridia strains can activate Tregs in colonic mucosa and thereby protect from colitis examples include
Herbal Medicines fortheManagement ofIrritable Bowel Syndrome andConstipation Problem
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 1 Dysbiosis and its interaction in IBS and related disorders
Changes
Gut microbiota
Firmicutes
Clostridioides difcile
Eubacterium spp.
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Listeria monocytogenes
Roseburia intestinalis
Ruminococcus albus
Ruminococcus gnavus
Bacteroidetes
Bacteroidetes spp.
Verrucomicrobia
Akkermansia muciniphila
Actinobacteria
Bidobacterium bidum
Eggerthella lenta
Mycobacterium avium
Atopobium parvulum
Proteobacteria
Campylobacter spp.
Eikenella corrodens
Escherichia coli
Haemophilus parainuenzae
Fusobacteria
Fusobacterium nucleatum
in IBS Mechanisms Evidence References
Toxins released by this bacteria can activate pro-inammatory cytokines and can cause epithelial barrier damage
Produce butyrate and is essential in maintaining the epithelial barrier integrity
Highly active metabolic commensal bacteria that contributes to the production of butyrate which is essential for the anti-inammatory activity, maintenance of homeostasis of barrier function, and immune responses
Cause epithelial cell infection High infection rates in IBS patients [39]
Protect colonic mucosa Produce butyrate
Produce SCFAs and have anti-inammatory actions
Involved in bile and amino-acid biosynthesis pathways
Production of propionate and damages the mucin layer
Production of SCFAs and activate the number of T cells in colon
Strengthen epithelial barrier function by enhancing the mucin production
Lack of possible mechanism More prevalence in IBS patients [46]
Increased production of pro-inammatory cytokines
Induction of colitis and mitochondrial dysfunction in IBS
Can survive even in anaerobic conditions in IBS Increased in IBS patients [49]
Involved in pro-inammatory response Increased in IBS patients [42]
Damage intestinal epithelial cells monolayers High abundance in colonic and ileal
Promote inammation in IBS Increased in stool of IBS patients [42]
Involved in damaging mucus layer Increased in CD samples [49]
High levels of C. difcile in IBS patients [36]
Low prevalence in CD and UC patients [37]
Low F. prausnitzii levels may be indicative of CD and IBS.Surgery patients with IBS who have low F. prausnitzii levels are more likely to experience post-operative recurrence
Decreased in CD/UC patients [40]
Decreased in IBS patients’ samples [41]
Decreased in CD patient stool samples [42]
Increased in CD patients’ samples [43]
Less prevalence in stool of both CD and UC patients
Decreased levels in IBS patients. Also, few studies reveal that treatment with probiotics which contain this bacterium can show positive response in IBS
High abundance in IBS patients [47]
Increased in CD patients [48]
mucosa of IBS patients
319
[38]
[44]
[45]
[50]
MAMPs, PAMPs, and DAMPs. While NOD-like receptors (NLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors are found in the cytoplasm, TLRs and CLRs are found on the surface of immune cells, epithelial cells, and other cell types. PRRs are generally expressed at greater levels in colonic epithelia and regulating PRR responses is essential to achieving improved clinical outcomes in IBS [32].
2.4 Diet–Microbiota Interaction inIBS
andRelated Disorders
Diet, gut microbiota, colonocytes, and immune cells are inti­mately associated during both the intestinal healthy condi­tions and inammatory state. The composition of microbiota is dynamic, uctuating with age and environmental factors