Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3663_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
26 Extra-Anatomical Venous Bypass Through aMalignant Tumor forPalliation ofMassive Arm Edema
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
91
Fig. 26.3 The right arm venography showed the occlusion of the right brachial vein and numerous collateral veins
Fig. 26.4 The space was made with the ination of balloon catheter
inserted via the left internal jugular vein
Fig. 26.5 Using the stent as a target, a 0.035inch guidewire was pulled through from the right brachial vein to the right internal jugular vein using a loop snare
92
Fig. 26.6 Two VIABAHN stent grafts were placed communicating between the right brachial vein and the right jugular vein
Y. Arai and M. Sone
Fig. 26.8 The edema of the right upper limb was signicantly improved 2weeks later
Fig. 26.7 The venography via the right brachial vein showed the smooth venous return to the right atrium
Retrieval ofPermanent VenaTech Filter
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
withRetained Migrated Fragments intheHeart andLung
MichaelMarkovitz andGlennHoots
27
A 68-year-old male with Factor V Leiden had a permanent VenaTech inferior vena cava (IVC) lter (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) placed for recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation [1]. Incidental imaging 4years later showed a tilted lter with struts extending posteriorly beyond the IVC (Fig.27.1). Despite being aware that the lter was technically permanent, the patient insisted on attempted lter retrieval.
ab
Jugular-directed forceps were used to bring the lter legs together, allowing them to be snared from a femoral approach. Whilst distracting the lter, the 18 Fr sheath kinked and mangled it (Fig.27.2). The main lter body was retrieved from above and retained caval struts individually removed with forceps. A fragment embolized to the proximal pulmonary artery was snared and removed. Additional frag­ments had embolized to the left lung and right heart; the risk
Fig. 27.1 (a) AP and bilateral oblique (not shown) scout images demonstrate a permanent VenaTech IVC lter tilted anteriorly. (b) Digital subtracted inferior venacavogram shows the posteromedial struts outside the IVC lumen
M. Markovitz (*) Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA e-mail: michaelmarkovitz@usf.edu
G. Hoots Department of Radiology, Tampa General Hospital, Florida Interventional Specialists, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Z. J. Haskal (ed.), Extreme IR, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24251-9_27
94
27 Retrieval ofPermanent VenaTech Filter withRetained Migrated Fragments intheHeart andLung
ab
95
Fig. 27.2 (a) AP uoroscopic image demonstrates kinking of the right femoral vein sheath within the IVC (b) with mangling of the lter upon sheath retraction
abc
Fig. 27.3 (a) Axial computed tomography (CT) shows a metallic den- sity in a peripheral branch of the left lower lobe superior segmental artery (yellow arrow) consistent with fractured lter fragment. (b) Axial
of retrieving these was deemed excessive. Final venography afrmed an intact IVC.CT demonstrated lter fragments in a peripheral branch of the left lower lobe superior segmental artery (7mm) and the tricuspid valve (3mm) (Fig.27.3). At 2-month follow-up, he was asymptomatic. To avoid CT radi­ation, chest radiography was performed: known lter frag­ments were not seen (Fig. 27.4). Further imaging was deferred as the small fragments were considered unlikely to
and (c) coronal CT demonstrate additional metallic density along the medial tricuspid valve (red arrows)
Removal of nearly every permanent lter has been reported, intact or in piecemeal fashion [2, 3]. Fluoroscopy and fused intracardiac echocardiography to remove intra­cardiac struts has been described [4]. This case empha­sizes the challenges and unique risks of such permanent lters, especially ones where multiple struts make long segments of wall contact, such as the VenaTech and TrapEase lters.
cause a complication or migrate.
96
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 27.4 Chest radiograph obtained 2months after lter retrieval demonstrating no acute ndings. Known left lung and right heart lter fragments are not visualized
M. Markovitz and G. Hoots
Bibliography
1. Millward S, Peterson R, Moher D, Lewandowski B, Burbridge B, Aquino J, Formoso A.LGM (vena tech) vena Caval lter: experi­ence at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5:351–6.
2. Kuo WT, Deso SE, Robertson SW.Vena tech LGM lter retrieval 16 years after implantation: piecemeal removal by intentional mechan­ical fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1731–7.
3. Ahmed O, Hadied MO, Madassery S. Retrieval of a perma­nent VenaTech LGM lter 18 years after implantation using a novel removal method. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6:526–9.
4. Hannawa KK, Good ED, Haft JW, Williams DM. Percutaneous extraction of Embolized Intracardiac inferior vena cava lter struts using fused Intracardiac ultrasound and Electroanatomic mapping. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1368–74.
Think Fast andAct Quick: Complex IVC Filter Removal
ZacharyHaber andMonaRanade
28
A rare complication of inferior vena cava (IVC) lters is upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) secondary to caval­duodenal stula. Here, we present the same complication managed by a minimally invasive percutaneous approach.
A 61-year-old male with complex surgical history for ret­roperitoneal liposarcoma, presented to the ED for UGIB secondary to duodenal perforation by his indwelling IVC lter strut. Chronic lter-related iliocaval thrombosis was noted on imaging (Fig.28.1). Vascular access was obtained, venogram was performed (Fig. 28.2). Complex IVC lter removal and through access from IJ to bilateral femoral vein was obtained with a gooseneck snare and serial balloon venoplasty was performed. Venography demonstrated active
a
extravasation around lter strut into duodenum (Fig.28.3a). To ensure re-entry, two kissing Vici stents (Boston Scientic, Marlborough, MA) were placed (Fig.28.3b). Using endo­bronchial forceps, advanced through a 16 French sheath, the IVC lter was removed. The caval-duodenal stula was then cannulated with a Progreat Omega microcatheter (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and embolization was performed with a 1:1 n-Butyl cyanoacrylate and Lipiodol (Guerbet, Villepinte, France) mixture (Fig. 28.4). Venography with glue cast (arrow) and coronal CT images conrmed resolution of the caval-duodenal stula (Fig.28.5). On post-procedure day 2, the patient resumed a normal diet and had no further epi­sodes of UGIB.
b
Fig. 28.1 (a) Coronal CT demonstrates IVC lter with strut within duodenum. (b) Endoscopy photograph conrms perforated lter strut
Z. Haber · M. Ranade (*) Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: zhaber@mednet.ucla.edu; mranade@mednet.ucla.edu
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Z. J. Haskal (ed.), Extreme IR, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24251-9_28
98
28 Think Fast andAct Quick: Complex IVC Filter Removal
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
99
Fig. 28.2 Venogram demonstrates iliocaval thrombosis
ab
Fig. 28.4 Spot uoroscopic image with microcatheter within caval­duodenal stula (arrow) and inated balloon within IVC to protect from non-target embolization (arrowhead)
Fig. 28.3 (a) Venogram demonstrates active extravasation around lter strut into duodenum. (b) Spot uoroscopic image shows placement of two 14×90mm stents within the iliocaval system
100
Z. Haber and M. Ranade
ab
Fig. 28.5 (a) Venogram with glue cast (arrow) with resolution of caval-duodenal stula. (b) Coronal CT correlate with glue cast seen (arrow)
Stent-Excluded IVC Filter Causing
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Severe Abdominal Pain: ThePorthole Retrieval Technique
RaghuramPosham, RobertLookstein, andAaronFischman
A 43-year-old female developed sudden severe abdominal pain and intractable vomiting. She had a history of DVT, PE, and symptomatic IVC-lter associated iliocaval thrombosis requiring prior multiple interventions. She ultimately under­went complete iliocaval reconstruction with stent-exclusion of the lter. On arrival, a CT scan showed one strut of the lter eroding into the duodenum (Fig.29.1).
29
Fig. 29.2 The right renal vein is catheterized using a 5-F× 65 cm,
Multipurpose A glide catheter, and 150cm, 0.038in Angle Gllidewire
Fig. 29.1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography axial image at the inferior aspect of the inferior vena cava (IVC) lter (Günther Tulip, Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN) shows penetration of the anterior strut into the duodenum
R. Posham (*) · R. Lookstein · A. Fischman Department of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA e-mail: Raghuram.posham@mountsinai.org;
Robert.lookstein@mountsinai.org; aaron.schman@mountsinai.org
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Z. J. Haskal (ed.), Extreme IR,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24251-9_29
(Terumo, Somerset, NJ) through the interstices of the Wallstent (Boston Scientic, Watertown, MA). The hook of the lter is seen near the ori­gin of the renal vein
Attempts to dissect along the right side of the stent were unsuccessful as the stent was completely endothelialized. The right renal vein was successfully catheterized through the stent interstices (Fig.29.2), showing the lter neck within the proximal renal vein. A wire was successfully directed back into the stent for through-and-through access (Fig.29.3a). Sequential venoplasty was performed through the interstices to create a “port-hole” in the stent next to the lter neck (Fig.29.3b).
An 18-Fr sheath was advanced from the internal jugular vein through the defect using the “swallow-the-balloon” technique (Fig.29.4), allowing endoscopic forceps to engage the lter neck and pull it into the sheath (Fig.29.5). A bal-
102
29 Stent-Excluded IVC Filter Causing Severe Abdominal Pain: ThePorthole Retrieval Technique
ab
103
Fig. 29.3 (a) The wire is passed back into the stent lumen and snared from above (6Fr × 120 cm, 20 mm loop diameter gooseneck snare, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for through-and-through access through stent interstices. (b) Sequential venoplasty was performed through the
loon was simultaneously inated over a safety wire in the stent to free the lter legs from the surrounding soft tissue, prevent stent crumpling as the lter was pulled into the sheath, and provide hemostasis in case of IVC rupture (Fig.29.6).
interstices using 4 mm–12 mm × 60 mm balloon (Charger, Boston Scientic, Watertown, MA) to create a “port-hole” fenestration in the wall stent in direct apposition to the lter neck
Following retrieval, a cone-beam CT was performed demon­strating a patent stent with adequate opposition to the IVC lumen. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged 2 days later with complete resolution of abdominal pain. She remained asymptomatic at 3-month follow-up (Fig.29.7).