Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_101_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
52 Мб
Скачать
https://t.me/med1917
288
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
the gastrointestinal tract or absorption through the nasal mucosa, which can cause signicant metab­olism. After administration, adequate drug absorption through the respective barrier layers may be a signicant factor in achieving a pharmacological response. Encapsulation in hydrophobic carriers, penetration enhancers, electrical transport, or chemical modication to increase hydrophobicity are all strategies for improving absorption of hydrophilic (thus poorly absorbed) compounds. Given the advances in nanotechnologies, new nano- formulations with regulated particle size and surface modication are being developed, which improve target selectivity, systemic half- life, and bioavail­ability of protein drugs.
However, newer approaches, like devices administering drugs orally into the gastrointestinal tract, face approval challenges due to dosing variability, akin to the withdrawal of inhalation insulin. Additionally, risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and dose limitations deter their approval.
12.4.1 intRavenous adMinistRation
Intravenous bolus, intravenous infusion, and subcutaneous delivery stand as the most commonly utilized methods for administering biopharmaceuticals. Typically, medications exhibiting poor or highly variable bioavailability, like oncology drugs, are administered intravenously to ensure precise dosing. Drugs that might provoke irritation in subcutaneous tissue are better suited for intravenous injection. However, this approach isn’t recommended for self- administration due to the signicant costs associated with drug therapy. Formulation challenges are minimal, except for the requirement that the drug be in a solution or a very ne emulsion to prevent vein blockage. Some biopharmaceuticals initially designed for intravenous injection or infusion have recently been reformulated for subcutaneous administration, enabling patients to self- administer them.
12.4.2 subcutaneous adMinistRation
Insulin holds the distinction of being the rst biopharmaceutical accepted for subcutaneous use. Intravenous bolus or infusion remains the most common route for medications necessitating pre­cise dosing calculations, particularly oncology drugs, and is typically administered by healthcare professionals. However, there has been a recent shift from intravenous to subcutaneous administra­tion due to economic reasons. After the introduction of subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab and rituximab in Europe between 2013 and 2014, numerous medications are now reformulated as subcutaneous dosage forms, moving away from intravenous administration. This shift enables self­injection of therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or primary immunodeciency, where mixed dosing (not based on body weight) is recommended.
Biopharmaceutical products given subcutaneously have a different pharmacokinetic prole than those given intravenously. The pharmacokinetic prole of biopharmaceutical products injected sub­cutaneously is typically marked by a slow rate of absorption from the subcutaneous extracellular matrix, resulting in lower C
levels lower than those obtained with intravenous dosing.
max
The absorption of molecules into the bloodstream follows a particular pattern, attributed to the reduced permeability of macromolecules through the vascular endothelial layer. Consequently, lymphatics serve as an alternative route for absorption into the circulatory system. Despite this function, lymphatic absorption poses a barrier to complete penetration for molecules injected sub­cutaneously. Interactions with interstitial glycosaminoglycans, proteins, and enzymatic degradation collectively contribute to the incomplete bioavailability of molecules injected subcutaneously.
In contrast to small molecules, biopharmaceutical products with molecular weights exceeding 20 kDa exhibit limited transportation through blood capillaries, predominantly entering the circula­tory system via lymphatics. Subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics is more immunogenic compared to intravenous dosing due to heightened exposure to the lymphatic system. Presently, regulatory agencies mandate immunogenicity testing for subcutaneous dosages over intravenous
https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
TABLE 12.12
289
Examples of Biopharmaceuticals Delivered in Subcutaneous Dosage Forms
Dosing
Molecule Brand Name (Originator)
Abatacept Orencia (Bristol- Myers
Squibb) Adalimumab Humira (AbbVie) q2w 0.4– 0.8 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen Anakinra Kineret (Swedish Orphan
Biovitrum GmbH) Certolizumab
pegol
Etanercept Enbrel (Amgen) q1w or twice
Glatiramer acetate Copaxone (Teva) q1d or three times
Golimumab Simponi (Janssen) q1m 0.5– 1 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
Insulin Several PRN variable Vials, prelled pen, syringes Interferon- beta- 1a Rebif (EMD Serono/ Pzer) Three times per
Interferon beta- 1b Betaseron/ Betaferon (Bayer) q2d 0.25– 1 mL Prelled syringe. vial, autoinjector Interferon beta- 1b Extavia (Novartis) q2d 0.25– 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, autoinjector Peg- interferon
beta- 1a
Rituximab MabThera/ Rituxan Hycela
Sarilumab Kevzara (Sano- Aventis) q2w 1.14 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen Tocilizumab Actemra (Roche) q1w and q2w 0.9 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen Trastuzumab Herceptin (Roche) q3w 5 mL Vial and syringe
Cimzia (UCB- Euronext and
Plegridy (Biogen) q2w 0.5 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
BEL20)
(Roche)
a
a
Frequency
q1w 1 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
q1d or q2d 0.67 mL Prelled syringe
q2w and q4w 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen
weekly
per week
week
q3w– q3mc 11.7– 13.4 mLVial and syringe
Injection Volume Device
autoinjector
0.5– 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen/ autoinjector, prelled cartridge for reusable autoinjector
1 mL Prelled syringe, pen/ autoinjector
autoinjector
0.2– 0.5 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/ autoinjector, electronic injection system
autoinjector
ones. Instances requiring administration of a biological drug via both subcutaneous and intravenous routes necessitate the demonstration of the safety of subcutaneous administration over intravenous administration.
Subcutaneous administration of biopharmaceutical products suffers from incomplete bioavail­ability of the injected molecule, typically ranging from 50% to 80% for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Understanding the enzymes involved and their translation across species in the pre- systemic catabolism at the subcutaneous administration site or the lymphatic system remains limited. For mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability correlates inversely with clearance after intravenous dosing; mAbs exhibiting lower intravenous clearance demonstrate higher subcutaneous bioavailability. Hematopoietic cells, such as macrophages or dendritic cells, play a role in both subcutaneous rst­pass clearance and systemic clearance after intravenous dosing. Due to poor bioavailability, subcuta­neous infusions generally necessitate higher dosages compared to intravenous infusions, resulting in higher costs for subcutaneous formulations.
To enhance the subcutaneous bioavailability of a biotherapeutic, subcutaneous infusions employing the dispersion- enhancer hyaluronidase can be administered or developed as co- formulations. This enzyme aids in the spread of injected uid within subcutaneous tissue, potentially increasing the bioavailability of co- injected molecules due to enhanced dispersion in the interstitial tissue.
https://t.me/med1917
290
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Subcutaneous injections, typically administered in a buffered aqueous solution, may induce pain, especially with solutions containing citrate buffer. For instance, Humira, a top- selling biopharma­ceutical drug, initially contained a citrate buffer causing discomfort upon injection. After the gene sequence patent expired, AbbVie reformulated the medication without the buffer, asserting that the large proteins themselves function as a buffer, a fact known to the developer. The reformulated version, being more concentrated, reduces injection volume and inammation, as stated in AbbVie’s new patent that now protects the company.
Subcutaneous administration offers sustained activity, as seen with insulin glargine, which precipitates upon subcutaneous injection, allowing for prolonged release. Recent advances in polymer science have led to the development of hydrogels for sustained drug release, high tissue compatibility, and patient self- administration. Hydrogels produce a deformable drug depot that steadily elutes a high drug concentration to surrounding tissue over time. However, most hydrogels chemically bind to drugs rather than covalently, resulting in rapid drug release over hours to days, limiting their suitability for long- term drug delivery.
12.4.3 oRal adMinistRation
While oral administration is the most common route, it’s nearly impossible for protein drugs due to permeability issues and chemical instability. Oral formulations often exhibit inconsistent bioavail­ability, particularly problematic for biological drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Investigations into lipophilic insulin and thyrotropin- releasing hormone derivatives, created by fatty acylation with palmitic or lauric acid for oral administration, are ongoing. These transformed drug molecules form vesicle- like structures (Prosome®, Pharmacosome®), signicantly enhancing drug bioavailability and circulation time in patients.
Microspheres, liposomes, or nanoparticles encapsulate polypeptide drugs within polymeric, phospholipid, or carbohydrate particulate delivery systems.
12.4.4 nasal/ PulMonaRy adMinistRation
The lung provides rapid and high drug absorption due to its expansive surface area (around 80– 140 m2), thin alveolar epithelium (0.1– 0.5 mm), and ample blood supply. Pulmonary drug delivery avoids hepatic rst- pass effects, is noninvasive, effective at lower doses, and can be used locally or systemically, pulmonary drug delivery is advantageous. Although lung tissue exhibits lower enzym­atic activity compared to the gastrointestinal tract, the pulmonary epithelium possesses several immunological properties. However, pulmonary delivery has certain drawbacks, including a short
TABLE 12.13 Orally Administered Biopharmaceuticals
Product Drug Route Indications
Minirin Desmopressin Oral, Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with multiple
sclerosis Sandimmune Cyclosporine A Oral Immunosuppressants Colomycin Colistin Oral Intestinal infection (caused by sensitive gram- negative organisms) Cytorest Cytochrome C Oral Leukopenia Cachexon Ceredist OD Taltirelin Oral Spinocerebellar ataxia Anginovag Tyrothricin Oral Pharyngitis Vancocin Vancomycin Oral Infection, Clostridium difcile- associated diarrhea Oral- Lyn Insulin Buccal Diabetes mellitus
®
Glutathione Oral AIDS- related cachexia
https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
291
duration of action due to the rapid removal of the drug. Inhaled drugs deposited in the lungs are swept towards the mouth, where they are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages and eliminated. Therefore, achieving a sustained drug release requires a method to circumvent or suspend the normal clearance mechanisms of the lungs before administering encapsulated drugs effectively. Generally, proteins within the molecular weight range of 6000 to 50,000 D exhibit high bioavailability after inhalation. Consequently, pulmonary administration has gained signicant attention as a promising method for delivering protein drugs.
Only a handful of drugs currently in development for pulmonary delivery encompass interleukin­1 receptor (asthma therapy), heparin (blood clotting), human insulin (diabetes), alpha- 1 antitrypsin (emphysema and cystic brosis), interferons (multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B and C), and cal­citonin and other peptides (osteoporosis). Inhalation delivery targeting specic tissues or organs can also be employed for gene therapy. Innovative dry powder formulations, packaging, and lling technologies like those by Inhale enable patients previously receiving injections to inhale medica­tion into the deep lung independently and painlessly, facilitating natural and effective bloodstream absorption.
Given its critical role in the efcacy of pulmonary drug administration, selecting an appropriate delivery system is vital in the formulation design for pulmonary drug delivery. Nebulizers (e.g., jet nebulizers, ultrasonic nebulizers, and vibrating mesh nebulizers), metered- dose inhalers, and dry powder inhalers are commonly used instruments to administer therapeutics as aerosols.
Various nanotechnology- based approaches have been extensively studied for successful protein delivery via the pulmonary route. Nanoparticles, in general, are promising as a protein delivery car­rier in the lungs due to their ability to target and release drugs in a controlled manner. Nanoparticles smaller than 200 nm can also avoid detection by alveolar macrophages, resulting in better absorption and drug action. In addition to polymeric nanoparticles, other nanocarriers such as liposomes, and solid lipid nanoparticles have all been utilized as nanocarriers for delivering protein drugs through pulmonary administration. Subsequent sections will explore these nanocarriers in more detail.
Inhalable insulin, a powdered form of insulin, is inhaled and absorbed through the lungs. Inhaled insulins work faster than subcutaneously injected ones, resulting in a higher peak blood concentra­tion and faster metabolism. Pzer introduced Exubera, the rst inhaled insulin medication, in 2006, initially developed by Inhale Therapeutics (later renamed Nektar Therapeutics). However, due to poor sales, it was withdrawn in 2007. The FDA approved Mannkind’s monomeric inhaled insulin, Afrezza, in 2014. Dypreza inhaled insulin by Highlands Pharmaceuticals received approval for sale in Europe in 2013 and in the United States in 2016. Achieving precise dosing with inhalable insulin can be challenging, particularly when administered through a specic system.
While the nasal route offers advantages such as increased bioavailability and ease of adminis­tration, it can also result in delivery to the brain. Macromolecules pass through the lungs easily, making pulmonary delivery a feasible noninvasive option for protein delivery. Inhaled insulin is absorbed faster than subcutaneously injected insulin, leading to an improved physiological response to a meal. However, an inhalation insulin device was recalled due to dose inconsistency. The nasally administered items are listed in Table 12.14.
The blood- brain barrier poses a signicant challenge in treating many neuronal degenerative disorders as it regulates the passage of most therapeutics, including proteins, into the central nervous system. In this context, the nasal route might be more effective than oral or parenteral routes. Strategies involving absorption enhancers to promote permeation through the membrane, mucoadhesive formulations to enhance nasal residential time, and prodrug approaches aim to opti­mize absorption. Various absorption enhancers, such as bile salts, surfactants, uidic acid derivatives, phosphatidylcholines, fatty acids (Tauro dihydro fusidate), cyclodextrins (CDs), cationized polymers, chelators, and cell penetration peptides, aid in facilitating drug passage through the nasal membrane. Mucoadhesive systems extend nasal retention time, enhancing protein bioavailability. For instance, the use of Carbopol 941 and carboxymethyl cellulose led to increased calcitonin and insulin nasal
https://t.me/med1917
292
TABLE 12.14
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Nasally Administered Biopharmaceuticals
Product Drug Route Indications
Antepan Protirelin Nasal Hypothyroidism and acromegaly Desmospray Desmopressin Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with
multiple sclerosis
FluMist® Quadrivalent Vaccine Nasal Inuenza
®
Fortical Kryptocur LHRH Nasal Cryptorchism Miacalcin Salmon calcitonin Nasal Hypercalcemia or osteoporosis Minirin Desmopressin Oral, Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with
Suprecur Buserelin Nasal Prostate cancer, endometriosis Suprifact Buserelin Nasal Prostate cancer, endometriosis Synarel Nafarelin Nasal Endometriosis Syntocinin Oxytocin Nasal This medication is used to start or strengthen uterine
Salmon calcitonin Nasal Hypercalcemia or osteoporosis
multiple sclerosis
contractions
bioavailability. Mucoadhesive polymers also enhance permeation by loosening the tight junctions in the nasal epithelium. Consequently, mucoadhesive micro- / nanoparticles, providing longer residence time and better permeation through the membrane, serve as useful carriers for protein drug delivery via the nasal route.
12.4.5 tRansdeRMal adMinistRation
Numerous cytokines are topically applied, yet using liposomes to deliver human epidermal growth factor signicantly improves its effectiveness. Peptide drugs could utilize the skin’s pilosebaceous pathway through niosomes (liposomes made of nonionic surfactants). For instance, vesicles made of glyceryl dilaurate cholesterol and polyoxyethylene- 10- stearyl ether enhance the absorption of interferon- alpha and cyclosporine. Transfersomes (a phosphatidylcholine/ sodium cholate mixture) have also been employed to deliver insulin through topical application in vivo.
Penetration enhancers, such as N- alkylazacycloheptanones (Azone) for desglycinamide arginine vasopressin, temporarily compromise the skin’s integrity or physicochemical characteristics to facilitate peptide transmission through the skin. In vitro studies demonstrate that the nonionic sur­factant n- decyl methyl sulfoxide enhances Leu- enkephalin penetration through hairless mouse skin, while a urea/ ethanol/ menthol/ camphor/ methyl salicylate hydroxypropyl cellulose gel improves the absorption of the nonapeptide leuprolide (a luteinizing- hormone- releasing- hormone analog) by increasing hydration and exhibiting a keratolytic effect.
Recently, researchers have explored iontophoresis, employing electrical stimulation of skin permeability to enhance the delivery of short peptides (model tripeptides, vasopressin), growth hormone- releasing factor (amino acids 1– 44), insulin, and luteinizing hormone- releasing hormone. Ultrasonic vibration has shown some success in delivering insulin in vivo.
Microneedles enhance patient compliance and provide a versatile platform for hydrophilic and high molecular weight drugs, including protein drugs, to overcome the skin barrier without causing pain. Comprised of silicon, plastics, biodegradable polymers, and carbohydrates, microneedles represent a painless instrument. The initial generation of microneedles utilized sturdy needles to perforate the skin membrane and enhance drug permeability. While solid microneedles seemed effective in delivering insulin, their usage is limited due to poor delivery performance, complicated
https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
293
administration, imprecise dosing, and the risk of infection. Recent advancements involve directly coating the drug payload onto the microneedle surface, resulting in more robust microneedles. Various
microneedles ensure continuous drug release upon the hydrolysis of the biodegradable polymer matrix. Polymers with high molecular weights and crosslinking density are preferred in the con­struction of these microneedles.
Sonophoresis utilizes ultrasonic waves to enhance drug permeability in the skin. Ultrasound waves cause expansion and oscillation of air pockets in the stratum corneum, disrupting the lipid bilayer and creating cavities that boost drug permeability. The degree of drug delivery via sonophoresis depends on the physicochemical properties of the drug, the duration of ultrasound exposure, and the pulse “on” length. While sonophoresis aids in biopharmaceutical transdermal delivery, caution is necessary due to the risk of protein instability from ultrasound exposure. Combining sonophoresis with methods such as chemical enhancers, electroporation, and iontophoresis signicantly improves drug delivery through the skin compared to using sonophoresis alone.
Electroporation, a recent approach in transdermal delivery of proteins and peptides, uses ultra­short pulses and electrical strength to alter the skin, enabling hydrophilic compounds to penetrate. Unlike iontophoresis, which propels a drug directly into the skin, electroporation primarily changes membrane permeability to enhance drug penetration.
12.4.6 oculaR adMinistRation
Ocular protein delivery faces challenges due to the blood- retinal barrier and efux transporters. Formulation viscosity affects ocular drug delivery, where higher viscosity increases corneal contact time but induces reex weeping and blinking.
Two products, an anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (anti- VEGF) aptamer and a monoclonal antibody (Lucentis; Ranibizumab), have gained approval for ocular delivery. Traditional topically applied dosage forms, such as eye drops, suffer from low bioavailability and therapeutic efcacy. Hence, new strategies have emerged to overcome ocular delivery barriers and enhance protein bio­availability through the ocular route. For instance, coadministration of chemical chaperones and recombinant human hyaluronidase facilitates protein delivery via the ocular path. To address protein aggregation concerns in ocular disease treatment, a novel strategy involving chemical chaperones, which act as protein aggregation inhibitors, has been devised to prevent misfolding and self- assembly of aggregation- prone protein sequences. Additionally, combining recombinant hyaluronidases with biopharmaceutical drugs has long been practiced to enhance drug penetration through ocular tissue barriers by breaking down hyaluronic acid, a vital tissue component. Research into nanocarriers like polymeric micelles, liposomes, nanospheres, nano wafers, and dendrimers focuses on controlled and targeted protein delivery through the ocular route, aiming to overcome ocular delivery barriers. Table 12.15 lists drugs administered through the eyes.
TABLE 12.15 Ocular Biopharmaceutical Products
Product Drug Route Indications
Cenegermin Oxervate Eye drop Neurotrophic keratitis Eylea Aibercept Ocular Wet age- related macular degeneration (WAMD), diabetic macular Lucentis Ranibizumab Ocular
edema (DME) or diabetic retinopathy (DR) in DME, macular edema following retinal vein occlusion (MEtRVO) WAMD, DME or DR in DME, MEtRVO, myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV)
https://t.me/med1917
294
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Nano wafers are small, transparent circular or rectangular membranes containing arrays of drug­loaded nano reservoirs that release drugs in a more controlled and long- lasting manner compared to eye drops (lasting from a few hours to several days). Among the polymers used are polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Placed on the patient’s ngertip, nano wafers can endure continuous blinking without being dislodged. They slowly release the drug, extending drug residence time, enhancing absorption into ocular tissues, and improving therapeutic efcacy. Moreover, as the drug is released, the nano wafer gradually dissolves, leaving the ocular surfaces free of polymers.
For ocular drug administration, drug- loaded contact lenses can be utilized. These lenses pro­long drug residence in the eye, thereby enhancing drug permeation into the cornea. Sustained drug release is achievable as drug molecules diffuse slowly from the lens matrix. Encapsulating the drug in nanocarriers and dispersing these loaded nanocarriers in the lens matrix further increases residence time and drug release rate. However, using contact lenses has downsides such as drug leaching during storage and delivery, along with safety concerns related to surface roughness that need addressing.
12.4.7 Rectal adMinistRation
Protein drugs, highly susceptible to physicochemical and enzymatic destabilization, benet from absorption enhancers, protease inhibitors, prodrugs, and nano formulations. Insulin, heparin, calci­tonin, recombinant human granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (rhGCSF), and human chorionic gonadotrophin require absorption enhancers. However, certain enhancers used in rectal drug delivery may cause irritation and damage to the mucous membrane. Protease inhibitors enhance rectal bio­availability by minimizing protein degradation. Using prodrugs shields proteins from peptidases and mucosal enzyme degradation, boosting protein and peptide absorption. Nanotechnology- based formulation methods further aid in enhancing protein drug delivery via rectal administration.
12.5 FORMULATION TECHNOLOGIES
12.5.1 hydRogels and in situ foRMing gels
Hydrogels, three- dimensional polymeric networks composed of crosslinked hydrophilic and bio­compatible polymers that swell in aqueous media due to their thermodynamic compatibility with water, have diverse clinical applications. These applications include contact lenses, biosensors, tissue engineering components, and drug delivery carriers. Hydrogels aid in safer and more com­fortable delivery of protein drugs. Notable polymers employed in protein delivery hydrogels encompass 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethyl acrylate, N- isopropyl acryl­amide, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid (MAA), poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), and poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA).
A hydrogel- based particulate formulation releases the protein in its active state and maintains therapeutic concentration for at least three months. Hydrogels, polymeric materials that do not dissolve in water and expand signicantly in an aqueous medium under physiological conditions, are formed through crosslinking. Crosslinking involves covalently linking polymer main chains, some­times including strong non- covalent interactions, preventing complete dissolution of the polymer. Hydrophilic polymer- based hydrogels absorb water, causing their network to swell due to the high water content, making them biocompatible and suitable for tissue regeneration. However, despite the potential advantages in drug delivery, designing extended formulations for drug release becomes challenging due to the high water content of hydrogels.
The mechanical properties of hydrogels are crucial in pharmaceutical applications. Adjusting the degree of hydrogel crosslinking is essential, as higher crosslinking yields a stronger but more brittle structure. Copolymerization produces hydrogels that are both solid and elastic.
https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
295
Physiological stimuli such as pH, ionic strength, and temperature are often employed in designing hydrogels. Responsive hydrogels change their swelling behavior, network structure, per­meability, and mechanical strength in response to environmental stimuli. pH- triggered drug release systems protect proteins in harsh gastric environments, facilitating more efcient oral delivery. Ionic hydrogels with groups that ionize in response to pH changes cause the hydrogel network to swell, known as pH- responsive hydrogels.
Nanogels, crosslinked polymer nanoparticles with hydrodynamic sizes ranging from 10 to 100 nanometers distributed in an aqueous medium while retaining their xed conformation, offer tailored properties. They can control their scale, surface charge, network density, and chemical functional groups for specic structural and functional needs.
Insulin molecules bound covalently to highly hydrophilic and multifunctional nanogels for nasal delivery have shown promising results. Poly (N- vinyl pyrrolidone)- based nanogels covalently bound to insulin cross the blood- brain barrier, displaying neuroprotection against amyloid ß- induced dys­function post intranasal administration, compared to free insulin.
12.5.2 nanoPaRticles
Nanoparticles increase protein physicochemical stability in the gastrointestinal tract by encapsu­lating them in a polymeric matrix within a size range of 10– 1000 nm. Non- toxic, non- immunogenic nanoparticles are crucial as oral protein carriers. They play pivotal roles in absorption, distribution, removal, and in- vivo action in the gastrointestinal tract. Nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm are more readily absorbed through the intestinal mucosa, while those larger than 500 nm have signicantly lower absorption rates. Custom ligands on nanoparticle surfaces can target receptor- mediated trans­port pathways.
Nanoparticles can be delivered topically, periocularly, suprachoroidally, or intravitreally. However, intravitreal injection of nanoparticles can cause vitreous clouding due to the light scattering properties of polymeric particles. Challenges in delivering nano- formulations of proteins include loss of bioactivity, low protein stability due to interactions with the nanoparticle matrix, and comprehensive nanoencapsulation methods, limiting the development of ocular delivery systems employing nanoparticles.
Nanoparticles utilize both natural and synthetic polymers for preparation. Common materials include polylactic acid, polylactic- co- glycolic acid, chitosan, gelatin, polymethylmethacrylate, and poly- alkyl- cyanoacrylate. Chitosan is a deacetylated chitin copolymer made up of glucosamine and N- acetyl- glucosamine., due to its biocompatibility, muco- adhesion, and low toxicity, stands out as an excellent choice for protein delivery carriers, improving cellular uptake by opening close junctions.
Alginate, a natural anionic polymer, serves as a commonly used drug carrier in the pharmaceutical industry. Its anionic surface charge facilitates gel formation when interacting electrostatically with cationic materials. However, high porosity in alginate beads often leads to drug leakage. Combining alginate with substances like chitosan or dextran sulfate mitigates this issue.
Various synthetic polymers, alongside natural polymer- based nanoparticles, serve as oral delivery carriers for protein drugs. One representative polymer is polylactic- co- glycolic acid (PLGA), formed from lactic acid and glycolic acid, creating a ring- opening copolymer known as PLGA. Its excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility make PLGA an exceptional drug delivery vehicle for oral protein delivery.
Redox- activated nanocarriers, sensitive to glutathione as a cellular redox regulator, have been proposed as effective mechanisms for drug and gene delivery.
In recent years, the use of nanoparticles for delivering protein drugs through the nose has garnered signicant interest. Mucoadhesive nanoparticles, particularly, tend to spend more time in the nasal cavity. Chitosan nanoparticles have been extensively studied for insulin delivery through the nose. Their positive charge enables prolonged contact with the nasal mucosal membrane, thereby enhan­cing insulin bioavailability. Intranasal administration of chitosan- N- acetyl- L- cysteine nanoparticles
https://t.me/med1917
296
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
and PEG- g- chitosan nanoparticles has shown improvements in insulin bioavailability. In intranasal vaccination, chitosan, PLGA, and polystyrene polymeric nanoparticles have proven effective in terms of antigen absorption. Trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles extend the antigen’s residence time, enhancing IgA and IgG efciency. Similarly, nasal administration of mucoadhesive chitosan nanoparticles signicantly improves nerve growth factor uptake in the brain.
Polymeric nanoparticles, due to their biocompatibility and ease of surface modication and copolymerization, are commonly employed as carriers for pulmonary drug delivery. Among natural polymeric carriers, chitosan, alginate, and gelatin are prevalent. In the realm of synthetic nanocarriers for pulmonary drug delivery, Poloxamer, poly(lactic- co- glycolic) acid, and polyethylene glycol stand out as the most frequently used.
Polymeric nanoparticles and a polymer- based thermo- gelling method prove benecial in ocular drug delivery.
Carbon nanotubes, cylindrically shaped carbon structures with unique physicochemical proper­ties, are easily manipulated on the surface and belong to the fullerene family. These nanotubes are ideal for targeted or controlled drug delivery, biosensing, and bioimaging due to their exceptional mechanical properties, high thermal conductivities, and capacity to penetrate cell membranes.
Nanoparticles exhibit lipid- uidizing properties, which inuence skin permeability by altering the extracellular lipids in the stratum corneum.
Lipid- based nanocarriers, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and nanostructured lipid carriers, have been studied extensively for ocular protein delivery. Prolonged drug release may help reduce the risk of ocular complications associated with multiple intravitreal injections, such as vit­reous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and cataracts.
Solid- lipid nanoparticles offer several advantages, including physical stability, targetability, con­trolled release, fast scale- up, and non- toxicity, owing to their composition of physiological lipids. They enhance drug absorption through the cornea, thereby increasing the ocular bioavailability of both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs.
Niosomes, self- assembling nanovesicles composed of nonionic surfactants resembling liposomes, are preferred for topical ocular drug delivery due to their chemical stability, biodegradability, bio­compatibility, lack of immunogenicity, and low toxicity. They exhibit structural exibility, encap­sulating both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. Discomes, a type of niosome with wide structures (12– 16 mm) as a result of the addition of Solulan C24 (nonionic surfactant), are advantageous for ocular administration, preventing drainage into the systemic pool due to their size and shape, tting comfortably into the eye’s cul- de- sac. However, their development is still in the early stages.
While polymeric nanoparticles have demonstrated benets across various delivery routes, there has been limited progress in developing them for rectal administration. Commonly used materials for polymeric nanoparticles in rectal drug delivery include chitosan and its derivatives such as PLGA, PLA, and methacrylic acid copolymers. Surface modications of these nanoparticles offer additional benets such as site- specicity or prolonged circulation periods.
Nano- sized liposomes are employed for rectal administration of macromolecules, with some studies investigating liposomal formulations. For mucosal immunization, updated nanoliposomes containing hepatitis B surface antigen are suggested consisting of a 1,2- dipalmitoyl- sn- glycerol­3- phosphocholine bilayer engulng a solid fat center (mainly glyceryl tripalmitate) and using monophosphoryl lipid A as an adjuvant and containing hepatitis B surface antigen for mucosal immunization, showing higher stability and signicant humoral and cellular immune responses in rats following intracolonic administration. Solid lipid nanoparticles are also utilized for rectal drug delivery, but evidence of their superiority over traditional formulations is yet to be provided.
Considering the hydrophobic nature of the stratum corneum, nanocarriers in lipophilic vehicles should effectively penetrate it. Nano- emulsions, low viscosity isotropic dispersed systems composed of two immiscible liquid phases, are generated through high- pressure homogenization, phase­inversion temperature, and micro- uidization. Their major disadvantage lies in physical instability
https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
297
during long- term storage due to their thermodynamically unstable nature. Nano- emulsions achieve a metastable state by optimizing particle size and surfactant composition. While less common in transdermal antigen delivery due to their instability, nano- emulsions have shown promise in trans­cutaneous immunization when used as nano- dispersions.
Polymeric micelles, sized between 10 and 100 nm, consist of amphiphilic block copolymers forming a shell of hydrophilic chains and a core of hydrophobic chains. They self- assemble in aqueous media, forming an organized supramolecular structure at concentrations surpassing their critical micellar concentrations. Poloxamer 407, poloxamer 188, methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)- poly(e- caprolactone), poly (butylene oxide)- poly (ethylene oxide)- poly (butylene oxide), polyhydroxyethylaspartamide, and isopropylacrylamide are some polymers used to create poly­meric micelles for ocular distribution.
Dendrimers, small polymeric carriers capable of capturing and conjugating high- molecular­weight molecules, exhibit treelike structures with well- dened, homogeneous, and monodisperse radial symmetry. Commonly utilized dendrimers include polyamidoamines, polyamines, polyamides (polypeptides), poly (aryl ethers), polyesters, and carbohydrates.
12.5.3 liPosoMes
Liposomes serve as carriers to encapsulate proteins within the aqueous core, enhancing membrane permeability for protein drugs. The structural similarity of liposomes to cellular membranes aids in intestinal absorption. However, they do have drawbacks as oral protein carriers due to chemical and enzymatic instability in the gastrointestinal tract. To address stability issues, surface coating becomes essential for oral drug delivery in liposomes. Various approaches, such as altering the liposomal surface using ligands interacting with specic receptors on cellular membranes, present promising possibilities. Lectins, a type of plant- derived glycoprotein, are a potential ligand for spe­cic binding to mucosal carbohydrate receptors.
Liposomes, bilayer vesicles comprising phospholipids, encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds within their aqueous core or bilayer structure. These phospholipid molecules arrange molecularly in water, exposing hydrophilic phosphate head groups to the aqueous environment due to their amphiphilic nature. Upon linking of hydrocarbon chains, a lipid lm forms. Upon addition of water and stirring, this lipid layer transforms into covered vesicles. Liposomes may exist as single bilayer (unilamellar) or multiple bilayers (multilamellar), with sizes ranging from 20– 100 nm for small unilamellar vesicles to 100– 1000 nm for large unilamellar vesicles (large unilamellar vesicles). Various methods such as dry lipid hydration, freeze- thawing extrusion, reverse evapor­ation, and double emulsication are employed to produce liposomes. The main steps involve lipid lm hydration, mechanical dispersion for liposome formation, and solvent removal. While vigorous shaking is commonly used, it results in polydispersed multilamellar vesicles. Extrusion through a narrow orice manipulates liposome size to produce monodispersed small unilamellar vesicle liposomes. Several physical stresses during liposome preparation, including heat, organic solvents, and agitation, can impact protein stability.
Proteins in liposome polymeric particles exhibit prolonged release when encapsulated. Bilayer destabilization causes liposome breakdown, releasing encapsulated agents. Processes like proton­ation of phospholipid head groups and acid- catalyzed bilayer hydrolysis contribute to biolayer breakdown in vivo, consequently altering the drug’s kinetic prole. Surface PEGylation reduces protein interactions with biological uids, preventing liposome aggregation and enhancing stability.
Archaeosomes, a lipid- based oral delivery system derived from polar lipids of various Archaeobacteria, possess unique structural features enabling stability under extreme conditions, including high temperatures, varying pH levels, and in the presence of phospholipases and bile salts. This potential for improved gastrointestinal stability has led to considerable interest in their use as protein carriers, including in vaccines. Nasal administration of drug- loaded liposomes has proven