Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_101_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
https://t.me/med1917
288
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
the gastrointestinal tract or absorption through the nasal mucosa, which can cause signicant metabolism. After administration, adequate drug absorption through the respective barrier layers may be
a signicant factor in achieving a pharmacological response. Encapsulation in hydrophobic carriers,
penetration enhancers, electrical transport, or chemical modication to increase hydrophobicity are
all strategies for improving absorption of hydrophilic (thus poorly absorbed) compounds. Given
the advances in nanotechnologies, new nano- formulations with regulated particle size and surface
modication are being developed, which improve target selectivity, systemic half- life, and bioavailability of protein drugs.
However, newer approaches, like devices administering drugs orally into the gastrointestinal
tract, face approval challenges due to dosing variability, akin to the withdrawal of inhalation insulin.
Additionally, risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and dose limitations deter their approval.
12.4.1 intRavenous adMinistRation
Intravenous bolus, intravenous infusion, and subcutaneous delivery stand as the most commonly
utilized methods for administering biopharmaceuticals. Typically, medications exhibiting poor
or highly variable bioavailability, like oncology drugs, are administered intravenously to ensure
precise dosing. Drugs that might provoke irritation in subcutaneous tissue are better suited for
intravenous injection. However, this approach isn’t recommended for self- administration due to
the signicant costs associated with drug therapy. Formulation challenges are minimal, except for
the requirement that the drug be in a solution or a very ne emulsion to prevent vein blockage.
Some biopharmaceuticals initially designed for intravenous injection or infusion have recently been
reformulated for subcutaneous administration, enabling patients to self- administer them.
12.4.2 subcutaneous adMinistRation
Insulin holds the distinction of being the rst biopharmaceutical accepted for subcutaneous use.
Intravenous bolus or infusion remains the most common route for medications necessitating precise dosing calculations, particularly oncology drugs, and is typically administered by healthcare
professionals. However, there has been a recent shift from intravenous to subcutaneous administration due to economic reasons. After the introduction of subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab
and rituximab in Europe between 2013 and 2014, numerous medications are now reformulated as
subcutaneous dosage forms, moving away from intravenous administration. This shift enables selfinjection of therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or primary immunodeciency,
where mixed dosing (not based on body weight) is recommended.
Biopharmaceutical products given subcutaneously have a different pharmacokinetic prole than
those given intravenously. The pharmacokinetic prole of biopharmaceutical products injected subcutaneously is typically marked by a slow rate of absorption from the subcutaneous extracellular
matrix, resulting in lower C
levels lower than those obtained with intravenous dosing.
max
The absorption of molecules into the bloodstream follows a particular pattern, attributed to the
reduced permeability of macromolecules through the vascular endothelial layer. Consequently,
lymphatics serve as an alternative route for absorption into the circulatory system. Despite this
function, lymphatic absorption poses a barrier to complete penetration for molecules injected subcutaneously. Interactions with interstitial glycosaminoglycans, proteins, and enzymatic degradation
collectively contribute to the incomplete bioavailability of molecules injected subcutaneously.
In contrast to small molecules, biopharmaceutical products with molecular weights exceeding
20 kDa exhibit limited transportation through blood capillaries, predominantly entering the circulatory system via lymphatics. Subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics is more immunogenic
compared to intravenous dosing due to heightened exposure to the lymphatic system. Presently,
regulatory agencies mandate immunogenicity testing for subcutaneous dosages over intravenous

https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
TABLE 12.12
289
Examples of Biopharmaceuticals Delivered in Subcutaneous Dosage Forms
Dosing
Molecule Brand Name (Originator)
Abatacept Orencia (Bristol- Myers
Squibb)
Adalimumab Humira (AbbVie) q2w 0.4– 0.8 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen
Anakinra Kineret (Swedish Orphan
Biovitrum GmbH)
Certolizumab
pegol
Etanercept Enbrel (Amgen) q1w or twice
Glatiramer acetate Copaxone (Teva) q1d or three times
Golimumab Simponi (Janssen) q1m 0.5– 1 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
Insulin Several PRN variable Vials, prelled pen, syringes
Interferon- beta- 1a Rebif (EMD Serono/ Pzer) Three times per
Interferon beta- 1b Betaseron/ Betaferon (Bayer) q2d 0.25– 1 mL Prelled syringe. vial, autoinjector
Interferon beta- 1b Extavia (Novartis) q2d 0.25– 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, autoinjector
Peg- interferon
beta- 1a
Rituximab MabThera/ Rituxan Hycela
Sarilumab Kevzara (Sano- Aventis) q2w 1.14 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen
Tocilizumab Actemra (Roche) q1w and q2w 0.9 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen
Trastuzumab Herceptin (Roche) q3w 5 mL Vial and syringe
Cimzia (UCB- Euronext and
Plegridy (Biogen) q2w 0.5 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
BEL20)
(Roche)
a
a
Frequency
q1w 1 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
q1d or q2d 0.67 mL Prelled syringe
q2w and q4w 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen
weekly
per week
week
q3w– q3mc 11.7– 13.4 mLVial and syringe
Injection
Volume Device
autoinjector
0.5– 1 mL Prelled syringe, vial, prelled pen/
autoinjector, prelled cartridge
for reusable autoinjector
1 mL Prelled syringe, pen/ autoinjector
autoinjector
0.2– 0.5 mL Prelled syringe, prelled pen/
autoinjector, electronic injection
system
autoinjector
ones. Instances requiring administration of a biological drug via both subcutaneous and intravenous
routes necessitate the demonstration of the safety of subcutaneous administration over intravenous
administration.
Subcutaneous administration of biopharmaceutical products suffers from incomplete bioavailability of the injected molecule, typically ranging from 50% to 80% for monoclonal antibodies
(mAbs). Understanding the enzymes involved and their translation across species in the pre- systemic
catabolism at the subcutaneous administration site or the lymphatic system remains limited. For
mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability correlates inversely with clearance after intravenous dosing;
mAbs exhibiting lower intravenous clearance demonstrate higher subcutaneous bioavailability.
Hematopoietic cells, such as macrophages or dendritic cells, play a role in both subcutaneous rstpass clearance and systemic clearance after intravenous dosing. Due to poor bioavailability, subcutaneous infusions generally necessitate higher dosages compared to intravenous infusions, resulting in
higher costs for subcutaneous formulations.
To enhance the subcutaneous bioavailability of a biotherapeutic, subcutaneous infusions employing
the dispersion- enhancer hyaluronidase can be administered or developed as co- formulations. This
enzyme aids in the spread of injected uid within subcutaneous tissue, potentially increasing the
bioavailability of co- injected molecules due to enhanced dispersion in the interstitial tissue.

https://t.me/med1917
290
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Subcutaneous injections, typically administered in a buffered aqueous solution, may induce pain,
especially with solutions containing citrate buffer. For instance, Humira, a top- selling biopharmaceutical drug, initially contained a citrate buffer causing discomfort upon injection. After the gene
sequence patent expired, AbbVie reformulated the medication without the buffer, asserting that the
large proteins themselves function as a buffer, a fact known to the developer. The reformulated
version, being more concentrated, reduces injection volume and inammation, as stated in AbbVie’s
new patent that now protects the company.
Subcutaneous administration offers sustained activity, as seen with insulin glargine, which
precipitates upon subcutaneous injection, allowing for prolonged release. Recent advances in
polymer science have led to the development of hydrogels for sustained drug release, high tissue
compatibility, and patient self- administration. Hydrogels produce a deformable drug depot that
steadily elutes a high drug concentration to surrounding tissue over time. However, most hydrogels
chemically bind to drugs rather than covalently, resulting in rapid drug release over hours to days,
limiting their suitability for long- term drug delivery.
12.4.3 oRal adMinistRation
While oral administration is the most common route, it’s nearly impossible for protein drugs due to
permeability issues and chemical instability. Oral formulations often exhibit inconsistent bioavailability, particularly problematic for biological drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Investigations
into lipophilic insulin and thyrotropin- releasing hormone derivatives, created by fatty acylation with
palmitic or lauric acid for oral administration, are ongoing. These transformed drug molecules form
vesicle- like structures (Prosome®, Pharmacosome®), signicantly enhancing drug bioavailability
and circulation time in patients.
Microspheres, liposomes, or nanoparticles encapsulate polypeptide drugs within polymeric,
phospholipid, or carbohydrate particulate delivery systems.
12.4.4 nasal/ PulMonaRy adMinistRation
The lung provides rapid and high drug absorption due to its expansive surface area (around 80–
140 m2), thin alveolar epithelium (0.1– 0.5 mm), and ample blood supply. Pulmonary drug delivery
avoids hepatic rst- pass effects, is noninvasive, effective at lower doses, and can be used locally or
systemically, pulmonary drug delivery is advantageous. Although lung tissue exhibits lower enzymatic activity compared to the gastrointestinal tract, the pulmonary epithelium possesses several
immunological properties. However, pulmonary delivery has certain drawbacks, including a short
TABLE 12.13
Orally Administered Biopharmaceuticals
Product Drug Route Indications
Minirin Desmopressin Oral, Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with multiple
sclerosis
Sandimmune Cyclosporine A Oral Immunosuppressants
Colomycin Colistin Oral Intestinal infection (caused by sensitive gram- negative organisms)
Cytorest Cytochrome C Oral Leukopenia
Cachexon
Ceredist OD Taltirelin Oral Spinocerebellar ataxia
Anginovag Tyrothricin Oral Pharyngitis
Vancocin Vancomycin Oral Infection, Clostridium difcile- associated diarrhea
Oral- Lyn Insulin Buccal Diabetes mellitus
®
Glutathione Oral AIDS- related cachexia

https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
291
duration of action due to the rapid removal of the drug. Inhaled drugs deposited in the lungs are
swept towards the mouth, where they are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages and eliminated.
Therefore, achieving a sustained drug release requires a method to circumvent or suspend the normal
clearance mechanisms of the lungs before administering encapsulated drugs effectively. Generally,
proteins within the molecular weight range of 6000 to 50,000 D exhibit high bioavailability after
inhalation. Consequently, pulmonary administration has gained signicant attention as a promising
method for delivering protein drugs.
Only a handful of drugs currently in development for pulmonary delivery encompass interleukin1 receptor (asthma therapy), heparin (blood clotting), human insulin (diabetes), alpha- 1 antitrypsin
(emphysema and cystic brosis), interferons (multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B and C), and calcitonin and other peptides (osteoporosis). Inhalation delivery targeting specic tissues or organs
can also be employed for gene therapy. Innovative dry powder formulations, packaging, and lling
technologies like those by Inhale enable patients previously receiving injections to inhale medication into the deep lung independently and painlessly, facilitating natural and effective bloodstream
absorption.
Given its critical role in the efcacy of pulmonary drug administration, selecting an appropriate
delivery system is vital in the formulation design for pulmonary drug delivery. Nebulizers (e.g., jet
nebulizers, ultrasonic nebulizers, and vibrating mesh nebulizers), metered- dose inhalers, and dry
powder inhalers are commonly used instruments to administer therapeutics as aerosols.
Various nanotechnology- based approaches have been extensively studied for successful protein
delivery via the pulmonary route. Nanoparticles, in general, are promising as a protein delivery carrier in the lungs due to their ability to target and release drugs in a controlled manner. Nanoparticles
smaller than 200 nm can also avoid detection by alveolar macrophages, resulting in better absorption
and drug action. In addition to polymeric nanoparticles, other nanocarriers such as liposomes, and
solid lipid nanoparticles have all been utilized as nanocarriers for delivering protein drugs through
pulmonary administration. Subsequent sections will explore these nanocarriers in more detail.
Inhalable insulin, a powdered form of insulin, is inhaled and absorbed through the lungs. Inhaled
insulins work faster than subcutaneously injected ones, resulting in a higher peak blood concentration and faster metabolism. Pzer introduced Exubera, the rst inhaled insulin medication, in 2006,
initially developed by Inhale Therapeutics (later renamed Nektar Therapeutics). However, due to
poor sales, it was withdrawn in 2007. The FDA approved Mannkind’s monomeric inhaled insulin,
Afrezza, in 2014. Dypreza inhaled insulin by Highlands Pharmaceuticals received approval for sale
in Europe in 2013 and in the United States in 2016. Achieving precise dosing with inhalable insulin
can be challenging, particularly when administered through a specic system.
While the nasal route offers advantages such as increased bioavailability and ease of administration, it can also result in delivery to the brain. Macromolecules pass through the lungs easily,
making pulmonary delivery a feasible noninvasive option for protein delivery. Inhaled insulin is
absorbed faster than subcutaneously injected insulin, leading to an improved physiological response
to a meal. However, an inhalation insulin device was recalled due to dose inconsistency. The nasally
administered items are listed in Table 12.14.
The blood- brain barrier poses a signicant challenge in treating many neuronal degenerative
disorders as it regulates the passage of most therapeutics, including proteins, into the central
nervous system. In this context, the nasal route might be more effective than oral or parenteral
routes. Strategies involving absorption enhancers to promote permeation through the membrane,
mucoadhesive formulations to enhance nasal residential time, and prodrug approaches aim to optimize absorption. Various absorption enhancers, such as bile salts, surfactants, uidic acid derivatives,
phosphatidylcholines, fatty acids (Tauro dihydro fusidate), cyclodextrins (CDs), cationized polymers,
chelators, and cell penetration peptides, aid in facilitating drug passage through the nasal membrane.
Mucoadhesive systems extend nasal retention time, enhancing protein bioavailability. For instance,
the use of Carbopol 941 and carboxymethyl cellulose led to increased calcitonin and insulin nasal

https://t.me/med1917
292
TABLE 12.14
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Nasally Administered Biopharmaceuticals
Product Drug Route Indications
Antepan Protirelin Nasal Hypothyroidism and acromegaly
Desmospray Desmopressin Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with
multiple sclerosis
FluMist® Quadrivalent Vaccine Nasal Inuenza
®
Fortical
Kryptocur LHRH Nasal Cryptorchism
Miacalcin Salmon calcitonin Nasal Hypercalcemia or osteoporosis
Minirin Desmopressin Oral, Nasal Cranial diabetes insipidus or nocturia associated with
Suprecur Buserelin Nasal Prostate cancer, endometriosis
Suprifact Buserelin Nasal Prostate cancer, endometriosis
Synarel Nafarelin Nasal Endometriosis
Syntocinin Oxytocin Nasal This medication is used to start or strengthen uterine
Salmon calcitonin Nasal Hypercalcemia or osteoporosis
multiple sclerosis
contractions
bioavailability. Mucoadhesive polymers also enhance permeation by loosening the tight junctions in
the nasal epithelium. Consequently, mucoadhesive micro- / nanoparticles, providing longer residence
time and better permeation through the membrane, serve as useful carriers for protein drug delivery
via the nasal route.
12.4.5 tRansdeRMal adMinistRation
Numerous cytokines are topically applied, yet using liposomes to deliver human epidermal growth
factor signicantly improves its effectiveness. Peptide drugs could utilize the skin’s pilosebaceous
pathway through niosomes (liposomes made of nonionic surfactants). For instance, vesicles made
of glyceryl dilaurate cholesterol and polyoxyethylene- 10- stearyl ether enhance the absorption of
interferon- alpha and cyclosporine. Transfersomes (a phosphatidylcholine/ sodium cholate mixture)
have also been employed to deliver insulin through topical application in vivo.
Penetration enhancers, such as N- alkylazacycloheptanones (Azone) for desglycinamide arginine
vasopressin, temporarily compromise the skin’s integrity or physicochemical characteristics to
facilitate peptide transmission through the skin. In vitro studies demonstrate that the nonionic surfactant n- decyl methyl sulfoxide enhances Leu- enkephalin penetration through hairless mouse skin,
while a urea/ ethanol/ menthol/ camphor/ methyl salicylate hydroxypropyl cellulose gel improves the
absorption of the nonapeptide leuprolide (a luteinizing- hormone- releasing- hormone analog) by
increasing hydration and exhibiting a keratolytic effect.
Recently, researchers have explored iontophoresis, employing electrical stimulation of skin
permeability to enhance the delivery of short peptides (model tripeptides, vasopressin), growth
hormone- releasing factor (amino acids 1– 44), insulin, and luteinizing hormone- releasing hormone.
Ultrasonic vibration has shown some success in delivering insulin in vivo.
Microneedles enhance patient compliance and provide a versatile platform for hydrophilic and
high molecular weight drugs, including protein drugs, to overcome the skin barrier without causing
pain. Comprised of silicon, plastics, biodegradable polymers, and carbohydrates, microneedles
represent a painless instrument. The initial generation of microneedles utilized sturdy needles to
perforate the skin membrane and enhance drug permeability. While solid microneedles seemed
effective in delivering insulin, their usage is limited due to poor delivery performance, complicated

https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
293
administration, imprecise dosing, and the risk of infection. Recent advancements involve directly
coating the drug payload onto the microneedle surface, resulting in more robust microneedles. Various
microneedles ensure continuous drug release upon the hydrolysis of the biodegradable polymer
matrix. Polymers with high molecular weights and crosslinking density are preferred in the construction of these microneedles.
Sonophoresis utilizes ultrasonic waves to enhance drug permeability in the skin. Ultrasound waves
cause expansion and oscillation of air pockets in the stratum corneum, disrupting the lipid bilayer
and creating cavities that boost drug permeability. The degree of drug delivery via sonophoresis
depends on the physicochemical properties of the drug, the duration of ultrasound exposure, and the
pulse “on” length. While sonophoresis aids in biopharmaceutical transdermal delivery, caution is
necessary due to the risk of protein instability from ultrasound exposure. Combining sonophoresis
with methods such as chemical enhancers, electroporation, and iontophoresis signicantly improves
drug delivery through the skin compared to using sonophoresis alone.
Electroporation, a recent approach in transdermal delivery of proteins and peptides, uses ultrashort pulses and electrical strength to alter the skin, enabling hydrophilic compounds to penetrate.
Unlike iontophoresis, which propels a drug directly into the skin, electroporation primarily changes
membrane permeability to enhance drug penetration.
12.4.6 oculaR adMinistRation
Ocular protein delivery faces challenges due to the blood- retinal barrier and efux transporters.
Formulation viscosity affects ocular drug delivery, where higher viscosity increases corneal contact
time but induces reex weeping and blinking.
Two products, an anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (anti- VEGF) aptamer and a monoclonal
antibody (Lucentis; Ranibizumab), have gained approval for ocular delivery. Traditional topically
applied dosage forms, such as eye drops, suffer from low bioavailability and therapeutic efcacy.
Hence, new strategies have emerged to overcome ocular delivery barriers and enhance protein bioavailability through the ocular route. For instance, coadministration of chemical chaperones and
recombinant human hyaluronidase facilitates protein delivery via the ocular path. To address protein
aggregation concerns in ocular disease treatment, a novel strategy involving chemical chaperones,
which act as protein aggregation inhibitors, has been devised to prevent misfolding and self- assembly
of aggregation- prone protein sequences. Additionally, combining recombinant hyaluronidases with
biopharmaceutical drugs has long been practiced to enhance drug penetration through ocular tissue
barriers by breaking down hyaluronic acid, a vital tissue component. Research into nanocarriers like
polymeric micelles, liposomes, nanospheres, nano wafers, and dendrimers focuses on controlled
and targeted protein delivery through the ocular route, aiming to overcome ocular delivery barriers.
Table 12.15 lists drugs administered through the eyes.
TABLE 12.15
Ocular Biopharmaceutical Products
Product Drug Route Indications
Cenegermin Oxervate Eye drop Neurotrophic keratitis
Eylea Aibercept Ocular Wet age- related macular degeneration (WAMD), diabetic macular
Lucentis Ranibizumab Ocular
edema (DME) or diabetic retinopathy (DR) in DME, macular edema
following retinal vein occlusion (MEtRVO) WAMD, DME or DR in
DME, MEtRVO, myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV)

https://t.me/med1917
294
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
Nano wafers are small, transparent circular or rectangular membranes containing arrays of drugloaded nano reservoirs that release drugs in a more controlled and long- lasting manner compared to
eye drops (lasting from a few hours to several days). Among the polymers used are polyvinyl alcohol,
polyvinyl pyrrolidone, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Placed on
the patient’s ngertip, nano wafers can endure continuous blinking without being dislodged. They
slowly release the drug, extending drug residence time, enhancing absorption into ocular tissues,
and improving therapeutic efcacy. Moreover, as the drug is released, the nano wafer gradually
dissolves, leaving the ocular surfaces free of polymers.
For ocular drug administration, drug- loaded contact lenses can be utilized. These lenses prolong drug residence in the eye, thereby enhancing drug permeation into the cornea. Sustained drug
release is achievable as drug molecules diffuse slowly from the lens matrix. Encapsulating the
drug in nanocarriers and dispersing these loaded nanocarriers in the lens matrix further increases
residence time and drug release rate. However, using contact lenses has downsides such as drug
leaching during storage and delivery, along with safety concerns related to surface roughness that
need addressing.
12.4.7 Rectal adMinistRation
Protein drugs, highly susceptible to physicochemical and enzymatic destabilization, benet from
absorption enhancers, protease inhibitors, prodrugs, and nano formulations. Insulin, heparin, calcitonin, recombinant human granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (rhGCSF), and human chorionic
gonadotrophin require absorption enhancers. However, certain enhancers used in rectal drug delivery
may cause irritation and damage to the mucous membrane. Protease inhibitors enhance rectal bioavailability by minimizing protein degradation. Using prodrugs shields proteins from peptidases
and mucosal enzyme degradation, boosting protein and peptide absorption. Nanotechnology- based
formulation methods further aid in enhancing protein drug delivery via rectal administration.
12.5 FORMULATION TECHNOLOGIES
12.5.1 hydRogels and in situ foRMing gels
Hydrogels, three- dimensional polymeric networks composed of crosslinked hydrophilic and biocompatible polymers that swell in aqueous media due to their thermodynamic compatibility with
water, have diverse clinical applications. These applications include contact lenses, biosensors,
tissue engineering components, and drug delivery carriers. Hydrogels aid in safer and more comfortable delivery of protein drugs. Notable polymers employed in protein delivery hydrogels
encompass 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethyl acrylate, N- isopropyl acrylamide, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid (MAA), poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG), and poly (vinyl
alcohol) (PVA).
A hydrogel- based particulate formulation releases the protein in its active state and maintains
therapeutic concentration for at least three months. Hydrogels, polymeric materials that do not
dissolve in water and expand signicantly in an aqueous medium under physiological conditions, are
formed through crosslinking. Crosslinking involves covalently linking polymer main chains, sometimes including strong non- covalent interactions, preventing complete dissolution of the polymer.
Hydrophilic polymer- based hydrogels absorb water, causing their network to swell due to the high
water content, making them biocompatible and suitable for tissue regeneration. However, despite
the potential advantages in drug delivery, designing extended formulations for drug release becomes
challenging due to the high water content of hydrogels.
The mechanical properties of hydrogels are crucial in pharmaceutical applications. Adjusting the
degree of hydrogel crosslinking is essential, as higher crosslinking yields a stronger but more brittle
structure. Copolymerization produces hydrogels that are both solid and elastic.

https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
295
Physiological stimuli such as pH, ionic strength, and temperature are often employed in
designing hydrogels. Responsive hydrogels change their swelling behavior, network structure, permeability, and mechanical strength in response to environmental stimuli. pH- triggered drug release
systems protect proteins in harsh gastric environments, facilitating more efcient oral delivery. Ionic
hydrogels with groups that ionize in response to pH changes cause the hydrogel network to swell,
known as pH- responsive hydrogels.
Nanogels, crosslinked polymer nanoparticles with hydrodynamic sizes ranging from 10 to 100
nanometers distributed in an aqueous medium while retaining their xed conformation, offer tailored
properties. They can control their scale, surface charge, network density, and chemical functional
groups for specic structural and functional needs.
Insulin molecules bound covalently to highly hydrophilic and multifunctional nanogels for nasal
delivery have shown promising results. Poly (N- vinyl pyrrolidone)- based nanogels covalently bound
to insulin cross the blood- brain barrier, displaying neuroprotection against amyloid ß- induced dysfunction post intranasal administration, compared to free insulin.
12.5.2 nanoPaRticles
Nanoparticles increase protein physicochemical stability in the gastrointestinal tract by encapsulating them in a polymeric matrix within a size range of 10– 1000 nm. Non- toxic, non- immunogenic
nanoparticles are crucial as oral protein carriers. They play pivotal roles in absorption, distribution,
removal, and in- vivo action in the gastrointestinal tract. Nanoparticles smaller than 100 nm are more
readily absorbed through the intestinal mucosa, while those larger than 500 nm have signicantly
lower absorption rates. Custom ligands on nanoparticle surfaces can target receptor- mediated transport pathways.
Nanoparticles can be delivered topically, periocularly, suprachoroidally, or intravitreally. However,
intravitreal injection of nanoparticles can cause vitreous clouding due to the light scattering properties of
polymeric particles. Challenges in delivering nano- formulations of proteins include loss of bioactivity, low
protein stability due to interactions with the nanoparticle matrix, and comprehensive nanoencapsulation
methods, limiting the development of ocular delivery systems employing nanoparticles.
Nanoparticles utilize both natural and synthetic polymers for preparation. Common materials
include polylactic acid, polylactic- co- glycolic acid, chitosan, gelatin, polymethylmethacrylate, and
poly- alkyl- cyanoacrylate. Chitosan is a deacetylated chitin copolymer made up of glucosamine and
N- acetyl- glucosamine., due to its biocompatibility, muco- adhesion, and low toxicity, stands out as an
excellent choice for protein delivery carriers, improving cellular uptake by opening close junctions.
Alginate, a natural anionic polymer, serves as a commonly used drug carrier in the pharmaceutical
industry. Its anionic surface charge facilitates gel formation when interacting electrostatically with
cationic materials. However, high porosity in alginate beads often leads to drug leakage. Combining
alginate with substances like chitosan or dextran sulfate mitigates this issue.
Various synthetic polymers, alongside natural polymer- based nanoparticles, serve as oral delivery
carriers for protein drugs. One representative polymer is polylactic- co- glycolic acid (PLGA), formed
from lactic acid and glycolic acid, creating a ring- opening copolymer known as PLGA. Its excellent
biodegradability and biocompatibility make PLGA an exceptional drug delivery vehicle for oral
protein delivery.
Redox- activated nanocarriers, sensitive to glutathione as a cellular redox regulator, have been
proposed as effective mechanisms for drug and gene delivery.
In recent years, the use of nanoparticles for delivering protein drugs through the nose has garnered
signicant interest. Mucoadhesive nanoparticles, particularly, tend to spend more time in the nasal
cavity. Chitosan nanoparticles have been extensively studied for insulin delivery through the nose.
Their positive charge enables prolonged contact with the nasal mucosal membrane, thereby enhancing insulin bioavailability. Intranasal administration of chitosan- N- acetyl- L- cysteine nanoparticles

https://t.me/med1917
296
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
and PEG- g- chitosan nanoparticles has shown improvements in insulin bioavailability. In intranasal
vaccination, chitosan, PLGA, and polystyrene polymeric nanoparticles have proven effective
in terms of antigen absorption. Trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles extend the antigen’s residence
time, enhancing IgA and IgG efciency. Similarly, nasal administration of mucoadhesive chitosan
nanoparticles signicantly improves nerve growth factor uptake in the brain.
Polymeric nanoparticles, due to their biocompatibility and ease of surface modication and
copolymerization, are commonly employed as carriers for pulmonary drug delivery. Among natural
polymeric carriers, chitosan, alginate, and gelatin are prevalent. In the realm of synthetic nanocarriers
for pulmonary drug delivery, Poloxamer, poly(lactic- co- glycolic) acid, and polyethylene glycol
stand out as the most frequently used.
Polymeric nanoparticles and a polymer- based thermo- gelling method prove benecial in ocular
drug delivery.
Carbon nanotubes, cylindrically shaped carbon structures with unique physicochemical properties, are easily manipulated on the surface and belong to the fullerene family. These nanotubes are
ideal for targeted or controlled drug delivery, biosensing, and bioimaging due to their exceptional
mechanical properties, high thermal conductivities, and capacity to penetrate cell membranes.
Nanoparticles exhibit lipid- uidizing properties, which inuence skin permeability by altering
the extracellular lipids in the stratum corneum.
Lipid- based nanocarriers, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, and nanostructured lipid
carriers, have been studied extensively for ocular protein delivery. Prolonged drug release may help
reduce the risk of ocular complications associated with multiple intravitreal injections, such as vitreous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and cataracts.
Solid- lipid nanoparticles offer several advantages, including physical stability, targetability, controlled release, fast scale- up, and non- toxicity, owing to their composition of physiological lipids.
They enhance drug absorption through the cornea, thereby increasing the ocular bioavailability of
both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs.
Niosomes, self- assembling nanovesicles composed of nonionic surfactants resembling liposomes,
are preferred for topical ocular drug delivery due to their chemical stability, biodegradability, biocompatibility, lack of immunogenicity, and low toxicity. They exhibit structural exibility, encapsulating both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. Discomes, a type of niosome with wide structures
(12– 16 mm) as a result of the addition of Solulan C24 (nonionic surfactant), are advantageous for
ocular administration, preventing drainage into the systemic pool due to their size and shape, tting
comfortably into the eye’s cul- de- sac. However, their development is still in the early stages.
While polymeric nanoparticles have demonstrated benets across various delivery routes, there
has been limited progress in developing them for rectal administration. Commonly used materials
for polymeric nanoparticles in rectal drug delivery include chitosan and its derivatives such as
PLGA, PLA, and methacrylic acid copolymers. Surface modications of these nanoparticles offer
additional benets such as site- specicity or prolonged circulation periods.
Nano- sized liposomes are employed for rectal administration of macromolecules, with some
studies investigating liposomal formulations. For mucosal immunization, updated nanoliposomes
containing hepatitis B surface antigen are suggested consisting of a 1,2- dipalmitoyl- sn- glycerol3- phosphocholine bilayer engulng a solid fat center (mainly glyceryl tripalmitate) and using
monophosphoryl lipid A as an adjuvant and containing hepatitis B surface antigen for mucosal
immunization, showing higher stability and signicant humoral and cellular immune responses in
rats following intracolonic administration. Solid lipid nanoparticles are also utilized for rectal drug
delivery, but evidence of their superiority over traditional formulations is yet to be provided.
Considering the hydrophobic nature of the stratum corneum, nanocarriers in lipophilic vehicles
should effectively penetrate it. Nano- emulsions, low viscosity isotropic dispersed systems composed
of two immiscible liquid phases, are generated through high- pressure homogenization, phaseinversion temperature, and micro- uidization. Their major disadvantage lies in physical instability

https://t.me/med1917
Formulation of Biopharmaceuticals
297
during long- term storage due to their thermodynamically unstable nature. Nano- emulsions achieve
a metastable state by optimizing particle size and surfactant composition. While less common in
transdermal antigen delivery due to their instability, nano- emulsions have shown promise in transcutaneous immunization when used as nano- dispersions.
Polymeric micelles, sized between 10 and 100 nm, consist of amphiphilic block copolymers
forming a shell of hydrophilic chains and a core of hydrophobic chains. They self- assemble in
aqueous media, forming an organized supramolecular structure at concentrations surpassing
their critical micellar concentrations. Poloxamer 407, poloxamer 188, methoxy poly (ethylene
glycol)- poly(e- caprolactone), poly (butylene oxide)- poly (ethylene oxide)- poly (butylene oxide),
polyhydroxyethylaspartamide, and isopropylacrylamide are some polymers used to create polymeric micelles for ocular distribution.
Dendrimers, small polymeric carriers capable of capturing and conjugating high- molecularweight molecules, exhibit treelike structures with well- dened, homogeneous, and monodisperse
radial symmetry. Commonly utilized dendrimers include polyamidoamines, polyamines, polyamides
(polypeptides), poly (aryl ethers), polyesters, and carbohydrates.
12.5.3 liPosoMes
Liposomes serve as carriers to encapsulate proteins within the aqueous core, enhancing membrane
permeability for protein drugs. The structural similarity of liposomes to cellular membranes aids
in intestinal absorption. However, they do have drawbacks as oral protein carriers due to chemical
and enzymatic instability in the gastrointestinal tract. To address stability issues, surface coating
becomes essential for oral drug delivery in liposomes. Various approaches, such as altering the
liposomal surface using ligands interacting with specic receptors on cellular membranes, present
promising possibilities. Lectins, a type of plant- derived glycoprotein, are a potential ligand for specic binding to mucosal carbohydrate receptors.
Liposomes, bilayer vesicles comprising phospholipids, encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic
compounds within their aqueous core or bilayer structure. These phospholipid molecules arrange
molecularly in water, exposing hydrophilic phosphate head groups to the aqueous environment due
to their amphiphilic nature. Upon linking of hydrocarbon chains, a lipid lm forms. Upon addition
of water and stirring, this lipid layer transforms into covered vesicles. Liposomes may exist as
single bilayer (unilamellar) or multiple bilayers (multilamellar), with sizes ranging from 20– 100 nm
for small unilamellar vesicles to 100– 1000 nm for large unilamellar vesicles (large unilamellar
vesicles). Various methods such as dry lipid hydration, freeze- thawing extrusion, reverse evaporation, and double emulsication are employed to produce liposomes. The main steps involve lipid
lm hydration, mechanical dispersion for liposome formation, and solvent removal. While vigorous
shaking is commonly used, it results in polydispersed multilamellar vesicles. Extrusion through
a narrow orice manipulates liposome size to produce monodispersed small unilamellar vesicle
liposomes. Several physical stresses during liposome preparation, including heat, organic solvents,
and agitation, can impact protein stability.
Proteins in liposome polymeric particles exhibit prolonged release when encapsulated. Bilayer
destabilization causes liposome breakdown, releasing encapsulated agents. Processes like protonation of phospholipid head groups and acid- catalyzed bilayer hydrolysis contribute to biolayer
breakdown in vivo, consequently altering the drug’s kinetic prole. Surface PEGylation reduces
protein interactions with biological uids, preventing liposome aggregation and enhancing stability.
Archaeosomes, a lipid- based oral delivery system derived from polar lipids of various
Archaeobacteria, possess unique structural features enabling stability under extreme conditions,
including high temperatures, varying pH levels, and in the presence of phospholipases and bile salts.
This potential for improved gastrointestinal stability has led to considerable interest in their use as
protein carriers, including in vaccines. Nasal administration of drug- loaded liposomes has proven
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
