Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5326_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
52 Мб
Скачать
138 Surface Modication of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
6 M KOH solution for anodic oxidation of Mg alloy, the formation of MgO coating was anticipated. On the other hand, when the potential was controlled in the passivation region, Mg(OH)
coating was produced.
2
Based on the anodic oxidation process of magnesium alloy in 6 and 10 M KOH
alkaline solution, MgO or Mg(OH)
coating on Mg allo y is prepared by anodic
2
electrodeposition at a constant potential of 1.0 V (vs. saturated calomel electrode) for 2 h. The Mg(OH) treatment in air at 400e450
coating is then converted to MgO by subsequent calcination
2
C(Hahn, Brunner, Kunze, Schmuki, & Virtanen,
2008; Latha, Li, Charles, Roger, & Wang, 2009)
6.2.2 Characterization of oxide coatings on Mg alloy
X-ray diffraction was employed to identify and investigate the phase composition of the oxide coatings formed by anodic oxidation of magnesium in different KOH solutions. Figure 6.2 shows the X-ray diffraction spectra of the as-grown and annealed samples. The XRD patterns, as shown in Figure 6.2a and b,indicate that the oxide coating formed in 6 M KOH solution, either at room temperature or after annea ling treatment, consists mainly of MgO, which is conrmed by the spe­cic peak at 2q ¼ 42.9 86e0441) besides the peaks of a-Mg. This fact mean s that Mg O coating lms can be obtained by simple anodic oxidation of magnesium allo y in 6 M KOH
(Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards card
10MKOH annealed
(d)
10MKOH
(c)
6MKOH
Intensity [a.u.]
annealed
6MKOH
(b)
(a)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2-theta / degree
Figure 6.2 X-ray diffraction spectra of as-grown and annealed samples (at 450C) for (a) anodizing in 6 M KOH at room temperature and (b) after annealing, as well as (c) anodizing in 10 M KOH at room temperature and (d) after annealing.
Anodic electrodeposition of MgO coatings to improve corrosion resistance in vivo 139
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
solution. In contrast , the XRD patterns of the magnesium oxidized in 10 M KOH solution, as shown in Figure 6.2c, reveal two peaks at 2q ¼ 18.3 tively, corresponding to Mg (OH)
crystal structure. After annealing treatment, these
2
and 38,respec-
two peaks disappeared; instead, a peak corresponding to MgO at 2q ¼ 42.9 emerged, as shown in Figure 6.2d, indicative of crystalline MgO formation.
Figure 6.3 shows the SEM surface morphologies of the oxide coatings formed at
room temperature and 50
C. Anodic oxidation of magnesium alloy in 6 M KOH
(a)
(b)
Figure 6.3 Surface morphology of MgO coatings produced by anodic oxidation in 6 M KOH (a) at room temperature (the inset is EDX analysis corresponding to the assigned area), (b) at
50
C, and (c) annealed at 450C for 2 h in air (the inset is a cross-section micrograph).
140 Surface Modication of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
(c)
Figure 6.3 (Continued)
solution at 1.0 V (vs. SCE) for 2 h at room temperature resulted in lamellar-like oxide coatings, as observed in Figure 6.3a. EDX analysis indicated that the oxide coating consists mainly of Mg and O, and the atomic ratio between Mg and O is approximately 1:1, implying that the oxide coatings consist of MgO, as evident by the inset in
Figure 6.3a. When the anodic oxidation temperature was raised up to 50
C while keeping other conditions unchanged, platelet-like MgO coatings were produced, as shown by Figure 6.3b. Figure 6.3c depicts the SEM micrograph of the as-formed MgO coatings after annealing treatment at 450
C for 6 h in air. It was found that the platelet-like morphology remains unchanged without any loss of structural morphology, indicating the as-prepared platelet-like MgO coatings were thermally stable. The cross-section micrograph, shown in the inset image in Figure 6.3c, disclosed that the thickness of adherent MgO coating on the Mg alloy surface is approximately 9.0 mm.
Anodic oxidation of magnesium alloy in 10 M KOH solution at 1.0 V (vs. SCE) for 2 h at room temperature results in compact oxide coatings, as observed in Figure 6.4a. EDX analysis indicates the oxide coating consists mainly of Mg and O, and the atomic ratio between Mg and O is approximately 1:2; evidence of Mg(OH)
formation is
2
shown in the inset of Figure 6.4a. Dense oxide coatings were formed by anneal ing treatment at 450
C for 6 h in air, as shown by Figure 6.4b. The top left inset, showing the EDX investigation for the assigned area in Figure 6.4b, revealed that the atomic ratio between Mg and O is approximately 1:1, indicating a change in chemistry of the oxide coatings from Mg(OH)
to MgO due to dehydration of Mg(OH)2. The
2
EDX analyses are in good agreement with the XRD results in Figure 6 2. The lower left inset image shows the cross-section micrograph, indicative of a thickness of approximately 7.5 mm MgO coating on the surface of the Mg alloy.
Anodic electrodeposition of MgO coatings to improve corrosion resistance in vivo 141
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
(a)
(b)
Figure 6.4 Surface morphology of oxide coatings produced by anodic oxidation in 10 M KOH (a) at room temperature (the inset is EDX analysis corresponding to the assigned area), and (b) annealed at 450 area and the lower left inset is a cross-section micrograph).
C for 2 h in air (the top left inset is EDX analysis corresponding to the assigned
6.2.3 Corrosion resistance of the as-grown MgO coatings
The corrosion resistance of the MgO coating-modied Mg alloy was determined in a
3.5-wt% NaCl solution after 45 min of immersion time using a potentiodynamic polarization test, as shown in Figure 6.5. To avoid the presence of some degree of nonlinearity in the Tafel slope region of the obtained polarization curves, the Tafel
142 Surface Modication of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
0
a bare Mg alloy b MgO (6MKOH)
–1
c MgO (6MKOH, annealed) d MgO (10MKOH)
)
–2
2
–3
–4
–5
–6
Log current density (A / cm
–7
–8
a
c
b
d
–1.7
–1.6 –1.5 –1.4
Potential E / V vs. SCE
Figure 6.5 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of as-grown and annealed samples in 3.5-wt% NaCl solution.
constants were calculated as the slope of the points after the corrosion potential (E by 60 mV. The E slopes (b
and bc), were derived directly from the polarization curves by Tafel region
a
and corrosion current density (i
corr
), and anodic/cathodic Tafel
corr
corr
extrapolation. In general, the cathodic polarization curve is attributed to hydrogen evolution reaction due to the reduction of water, while the anodic polarization curve is associated with the dissolution of Mg, leading to the formation of Mg
2þ
(Ambat,
Aung, & Zhou, 2000). The polarization resistance (Rp) values were determined
from the SterneGeary equation (Stern & Geary, 1957):
bab
R
¼
p
2:303 i
c
corrðba
þ b
(6.4)
These results of potentiodynamic polarization are summ arized in Table 6.1. It was found that the polarization curve for annealed MgO coating formed in 6 M KOH showed a more positive shift than untreated MgO lm, likely due to the consolidation and higher crystallization of MgO coating after thermal treatment. Moreover, compared with the bare Mg alloy, the E
of annealed MgO coatings, formed in either
corr
6 or 10 M KOH, positively shifted approximately 100 and 260 mV, respectively, and the i
lowered more than 10 to 100 times, while the corrosion resistances increased
corr
by three and four orders. The positive shift of corrosion potentials accompanied by a decrease of corrosion currents and increase of polarization resistances indicate a decreased tendency to corrosion of MgO-coated samples. The polarization test
)
Anodic electrodeposition of MgO coatings to improve corrosion resistance in vivo 143
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table 6.1 Corrosion parameters of bare and MgO coatings modied
Mg alloy in 3.5-wt% NaCl
Samples E
Bare Mg alloy 1.62 1.25 10
MgO (6 M KOH) 1.53 2.16 10
MgO (6 M KOH,
(V) i
corr
(A/cm2)R
corr
1.51 6.30 10
4
5
6
(U cm2)
p
4.27 10
1.68 10
1.35 10
2
4
5
annealed)
MgO (10 M KOH) 1.46 6.02 10
6
2.84 10
5
results lead directly to the conclusion that MgO coating lm could signicantly improve overall corrosion protection of Mg alloy in NaCl solution.
The different polarization behaviors of the MgO coatings on magnesium alloy are mainly du e to their different structure and compact state. When the bare Mg alloy substrate was immersed in NaCl solution, loose and porous Mg(OH) on Mg alloy surface. With increasing anodic potential during polarization, corrosive intermediate (Cl
) was rapidly transferred through the outer porous layer and reached
formed quickly
2
the inner Mg alloy matrix, which then resulted in increasing polarization current. At the same time, the chloride ions can transform Mg(OH) High Cl
concentration will accelerate the transform reaction of Mg(OH)2to MgCl
to more soluble MgCl2.
2
2
and promote the dissolution of magnesium alloy (Altun & Sen, 2004). Therefore, the bare Mg alloy showed rapid corrosion rate. As evidenced by SEM, EDX, and XRD analysis, lamellar-like MgO coatings were produced on Mg alloy surface in 6 M KOH. After annealing treatment, the surface coating lm was fused and consol­idated to a thick layer, while the MgO coatings formed in 10 M KOH following annealing treatment were densely compact with a thickness of 7.5 mm. Thus, the as-grown MgO coating on Mg alloy surface may serve as a barrier, which could prevent the Mg matrix from direct contact with the corrosive medium as well as block the transportation of water and Cl
needed for the corrosion reaction into the under-
lying Mg alloy matrix.
It was reported that the protection afforded by the coating is proportional to the coating thickness (Gray & Luan, 2002). Accordingly, the MgO coating lm could protect substrate from corrosion attack by acting as a physical shield between metal andmedium,andthusthecorrosionprocessslowsdownbyadoubleeffectof adecreaseofchargetransferrateandthedecreaseofdiffusionux across the sur­face layer (Barchiche, Rocca, Juers, Hazan, & Steinmetz, 2007). Moreover, annealedMgOcoatingformedin10MKOHshowedsuperiorcorrosionresistance to that produced in 6 M KOH without performing thermal treatm ent, likely because there existed more micropores in the lamellar-like MgO lm than in densely compact MgO lm. App are nt ly, the corrosion properties of t he MgO coating are strongly dependent on their morphology, thickness, agglomeration state, and prep­aration process.
)
144 Surface Modication of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
6.2.4 Immersion behavior of MgO-coated Mg alloy in SBF
Regarding the immersion test, annealed MgO coating formed in 10 M KOH is discussed. Figure 6.6 shows the variation of the pH value of SBF as a function of immersion time. It can be seen that the pH values of the solutions corresponding to MgO-coated and bare Mg alloy specimens increased rapidly, from 7.2 to 8.6 in the initial 8 h of immersion. After that, the pH value of the solution for MgO-coated Mg alloy increased slowly with immersion time and became placid at 8.8, whereas the pH value of the solution for bare Mg specimens kept increasing and reached to
9.5 after 72 h of immersion. It is well known that magnesium is an active metal element with a low potential of
2.34 V against normal hydrogen electrode. When a magnesium alloy is exposed to corrosive electrolyte, the main reaction is the anodic Mg dissolution and cathodic hydrogen evolution, which can be described as follows (Song, Andrej, & St. John, 2001):
Mg/Mg
2H
2þ
O þ 2ee/2OHeþ H2[ (6.6)
2
þ 2e
e
(6.5)
In the case of MgO-coated Mg alloy, the MgO coatings function as a barrier, whi ch
could prevent the Mg matrix from direct contact wi th corrosive media as well as block the penetration of electrolytes. Accordingly, at the initial immersion stage, the corrosion attack is limited at the MgO coating layer. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that MgO and Mg(OH)
could stably exist in pH domains higher than
2
13.83 and 11.46, respectively (Zhang, Yan, Wang, & Li, 2005). As a result, MgO
coating lm will be subjected to progressive chemical dissolution in neutral aqueous solutions, according to following equations (Ambat et al., 2000):
9.5
9.0
8.5
pH value
8.0
7.5
(a)
(b)
7.0
Figure 6.6 The pH value of SBF as a function of immersion time for (a) the bare and (b) MgO-coated Mg alloy specimens.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
Time(h
Anodic electrodeposition of MgO coatings to improve corrosion resistance in vivo 145
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
MgO þ H2O/Mg(OH)
Mg(OH)
/Mg2þþ 2OH
2
As a result of the OH
2
e
ion formation, the pH at the specimen surface rises quickly
(6.7)
(6.8)
in the initial immersion stage. The slow increase of pH value of the solution for a specimen with MgO coating indicates a relatively slow chemical dissolution and an improvement of the corrosion resistance of MgO coatings.
The corrosion behavior of MgO-coated Mg alloy specimens was also evaluated by immersion tests in SBF. At the beginning of immersion, large numbers of hydrogen bubbles are evidently observed arising from the surface of the bare Mg alloy sub­strate due to the reaction of substrate with the corrosive electrolyte, while almost no hydrogen evolution is found on the surface of MgO-coated Mg alloy in the 72-h immersion period, which indicates that the MgO coatings effectively retard the hydrogen gas evolution. After a few hours, the bare Mg samples were covered with white corrosion products. As the immersion time increased, the amount of corrosion products formed on the untreated specimen increased and detached corro­sion products were observed on the bottom of the beaker. On the other hand, the appearance of MgO-coated Mg alloy specimens had no signicant changes.
Surface morphologies after immersion in SBF for 72 h were examined to compare the corrosion resistance of Mg alloy with and without MgO coatings. The surface appearance of the samples after the immersion tests are shown in Figure 6.7, which reveals large differences in the degree of corrosion attack during the immersion period. The micrograph depicted in Figure 6.7a shows that the bare Mg alloy surface was totally covered with corrosion products with a big concave pit after 72 h of im­mersion in SBF, implying that locally severe corrosion occurred on the surface and the corrosion products in pits were detached away into solution. On the other hand, after the total immersion tests, a small amount of corrosion products were observed on the surface of the MgO-coated specimens, as shown by Figure 6.7b, but there were no detached corrosion products throughout the immersion test, indicating a much milder corrosion.
To get better insight on the corroded surface appearance of Mg alloy with and without MgO coatings after immersion tests, the corrosion products and MgO coat­ings were removed by chromic acid. Figure 6.8 shows the SEM surface morphol- ogies of the as-cleaned Mg alloy specimens. As can be seen in Figure 6.8a,thereare deep pits (indicated by arrows ) on the bare Mg all oy surface, implying that the un­treatedMgalloysufferedfrom localized severe corrosion attack. It is well known that the presence of pits is detrimental to the overall corrosion resistance, and the destruction of Mg alloy will proceed by means of pitting corrosion from one or more of them (Zhang et al., 2005). On the other hand, there is no obvious corrosion site area visible on the MgO-coated Mg alloy surface after the removal of MgO coatings, as shown in Figure 6.8b. Zooming in, only slightly corrosion-attacked spots exist on the as-cleaned Mg alloy substrate, as shown by the inset in
Figure 6.8b. This is likely due to the penetration of water and electrolytes into
the underlying Mg alloy matrix through the micropores existing in the MgO
146 Surface Modication of Magnesium and its Alloys for Biomedical Applications
Figure 6.7 Surface morphologies after immersion in SBF for 72 h for (a) the bare and (b) MgO-coated Mg alloy specimens.
coatings, resulting in the corrosion attack. However, this decreased corrosion reac­tion reveals that the MgO coating lm on Mg alloy could effectively protect the substrate from corrosion attacks during the immersion tests by acting as a barrier against corrosive electrolyte ingress into the underlying Mg alloy matrix. Conse­quently, the immersion tests indicate a much milder and more uniform corrosion attack for the MgO-coated Mg alloy specimens, consistent with the electrochemical
Anodic electrodeposition of MgO coatings to improve corrosion resistance in vivo 147
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Figure 6.8 After 72 h of immersion in SBF. (a) The locally severe attacked surface morphology of the bare Mg alloy after the removal of corrosion products. (b) Slightly corroded surface morphology of Mg alloy after removal of the corrosion products and MgO coating layer. Inset is an enlarged image.