Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_706_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Editor in Chief
- •Compile Secretary
- •Review Experts
- •Case Providers
- •1.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •1.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •1.1.3 Therapy
- •1.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •1.1.3.2 Treatment
- •1.1.4 Prognosis
- •1.2.1 Introduction
- •1.2.2 Case Background
- •1.2.2.2 Physical Examination
- •1.2.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •1.2.3 Therapy
- •1.2.3.1 Case Analysis
- •1.2.3.2 Treatment
- •1.2.4 Prognosis
- •1.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •2.1.1 Introduction
- •2.1.2 Case Background
- •Translators
- •1.1.1 Introduction
- •1.1.2 Case Background
- •2.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •2.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •2.1.3 Therapy
- •2.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •2.1.3.2 Treatment
- •2.1.4 Prognosis
- •2.2.1 Case Background
- •2.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •2.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •2.2.2 Therapy
- •2.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •2.2.2.2 Treatment
- •2.2.3 Prognosis
- •2.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •3.1.1 Introduction
- •3.1.2 Case Background
- •3.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •3.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •3.1.3 Therapy
- •3.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •3.1.3.2 Treatment
- •3.1.4 Prognosis
- •3.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •4.1.1 Introduction
- •4.1.2 Case Background
- •4.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •4.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •4.1.2.4 Primary Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Therapy
- •4.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •4.1.3.2 Treatment
- •4.1.4 Prognosis
- •4.2.1 Introduction
- •4.2.2 Case Background
- •4.2.2.2 Physical Examination
- •4.2.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •4.2.2.4 Primary Diagnosis
- •4.2.3 Therapy
- •4.2.3.1 Case Analysis
- •4.2.3.2 Treatment
- •4.2.4 Prognosis
- •4.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •5.1.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 Case Background
- •5.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •5.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •5.1.3 Therapy
- •5.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •5.1.3.2 Treatment
- •7.1.1 Introduction
- •7.1.2 Case Background
- •7.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •5.1.4 Prognosis
- •5.2.1 Case Background
- •5.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •5.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •5.2.2 Therapy
- •5.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •5.2.2.2 Treatment
- •5.2.3 Prognosis
- •5.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •6.1.1 Introduction
- •6.1.2 Case Background
- •6.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •6.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •6.1.3 Therapy
- •6.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •6.1.3.2 Treatment
- •6.1.4 Prognosis
- •6.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •7.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •7.1.2.4 Primary Diagnosis
- •7.1.3 Therapy
- •7.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •7.1.3.2 Treatment
- •7.1.4 Prognosis
- •7.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •8.1.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Case Background
- •8.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •8.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •8.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •8.1.3 Therapy
- •8.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •8.1.3.2 Therapy
- •8.1.4 Prognosis
- •8.1.5.2 Close Assessment Is Key during Preoperative Therapy
- •8.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •9.1.1 Introduction
- •9.1.2 Case Background
- •9.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •9.1.2.3 Auxiliary Inspection
- •9.1.3 Therapy
- •9.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •9.1.3.2 Treatment
- •9.1.3.4 Prognosis
- •9.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •10: Small Hypermitotic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •10.1.1 Introduction
- •10.1.2 Case Background
- •10.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •10.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •10.1.3 Therapy
- •10.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •10.1.3.2 Treatment
- •10.1.4 Prognosis
- •10.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •11: Mitotic Extremely High Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •11.1.1 Introduction
- •11.1.2 Case Background
- •11.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •11.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •11.1.2.4 Primary Diagnosis
- •11.1.3 Therapy
- •11.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •11.1.3.2 Treatment
- •11.1.4 Prognosis
- •11.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •12: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •12.1.1 Introduction
- •12.1.2 Case Background
- •12.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •12.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •12.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •12.1.3 Therapy
- •12.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •12.1.3.2 Treatment
- •12.1.4 Prognosis
- •12.2.1 Case Background
- •12.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •12.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •12.2.1.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •12.2.2 Therapy
- •12.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •12.2.2.2 Treatment
- •12.2.3 Prognosis
- •12.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •13: Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficient GIST
- •13.1.1 Introduction
- •13.1.2 Case Background
- •13.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •13.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •13.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •13.1.3 Therapy
- •13.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •13.1.3.2 Treatment
- •13.1.4 Prognosis
- •13.2.1 Case Background
- •13.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •13.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •13.2.2 Primary Diagnosis
- •13.2.3 Therapy
- •13.2.3.1 Case Analysis
- •13.2.3.2 Treatment
- •13.2.4 Prognosis
- •13.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •14.1.1 Introduction
- •14.1.2 Case Background
- •14.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •14.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •14.1.3 Primary Diagnosis
- •14.1.4 Therapy
- •14.1.4.1 Case Analysis
- •14.1.4.2 Treatment
- •14.1.5 Prognosis
- •14.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •15.1.1 Introduction
- •15.1.2 Case Background
- •15.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •15.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •15.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •15.1.3 Therapy
- •15.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •15.1.3.2 Treatment
- •15.1.4 Prognosis
- •15.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •16: Multiple Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •16.1.1 Introduction
- •16.1.2 Case Background
- •16.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •16.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •16.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •16.1.3 Therapy
- •16.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •16.1.3.2 Treatment
- •16.1.4 Prognosis
- •16.2.1 Case Background
- •16.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •16.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •16.2.1.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •16.2.2 Therapy
- •16.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •16.2.2.2 Treatment
- •16.2.3 Prognosis
- •16.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •17: Hereditary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- •17.1.1 Introduction
- •17.1.2 Case Background
- •17.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •17.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •17.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •17.1.3 Therapy
- •17.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •17.1.3.2 Treatment
- •17.1.4 Prognosis
- •17.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •18.1.1 Introduction
- •18.1.2 Case Background
- •18.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •18.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •18.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •18.1.3 Therapy
- •18.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •18.1.3.2 Treatment
- •18.1.3.3 Postoperative Pathology
- •18.1.4 Prognosis
- •18.1.5.3 Adjuvant Therapy
- •18.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •19.1.1 Introduction
- •19.1.2 Case Background
- •19.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •19.1.2.3 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •19.1.3 Therapy
- •19.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •19.1.3.2 Treatment
- •19.1.4 Prognosis
- •19.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •20: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Progression During Adjuvant Therapy
- •20.1.1 Introduction
- •20.1.2 Case Background
- •20.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •20.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •20.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •20.1.3 Therapy
- •20.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •20.1.3.2 Treatment
- •20.1.4 Prognosis
- •20.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •21: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Recurrence After Stopping Adjuvant Therapy
- •21.1.1 Introduction
- •21.1.2 Case Background
- •21.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •21.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •21.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •21.1.3 Therapy
- •21.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •21.1.3.2 Treatment
- •21.1.3.3 Postoperative Pathology
- •21.1.4 Prognosis
- •21.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •22: Low Risk Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Recurrence 12 Years After Surgery
- •22.1.1 Introduction
- •22.1.2 Case Background
- •22.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •22.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •22.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •22.1.3 Therapy
- •22.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •22.1.3.2 Treatment
- •22.1.3.3 Postoperative Pathology
- •22.1.4 Prognosis
- •22.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •23.1.1 Introduction
- •23.1.2 Case Background
- •23.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •23.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •23.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •23.1.3 Therapy
- •23.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •23.1.3.2 Treatment
- •23.1.4 Prognosis
- •23.2.1 Case Background
- •23.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •23.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •23.2.1.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •23.2.2 Therapy
- •23.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •23.2.2.2 Treatment
- •September 2010
- •November 2013
- •December 2015
- •23.2.3 Prognosis
- •23.3 Expert Comments
- •References
- •24.1.1 Introduction
- •24.1.2 Case Background
- •24.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •24.1.2.3 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •24.1.3 Therapy
- •24.1.3.1 Auxiliary Examination
- •24.1.3.2 Case Analysis
- •24.1.4 Prognosis
- •24.2 Case Review
- •References
- •25.1.1 Introduction
- •25.1.2 Case Background
- •25.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •25.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •25.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •25.1.3 Therapy
- •25.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •25.1.3.2 Treatment
- •25.1.4 Prognosis
- •25.2 Expert Comments
- •25.3.1 Introduction
- •25.3.2 Case Background
- •25.3.2.2 Physical Examination
- •25.3.2.3 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •25.3.3 Therapy
- •25.3.3.1 Case Analysis
- •25.3.3.2 Treatment
- •25.3.4 Prognosis
- •25.4.1 Case Background
- •25.4.1.2 Physical Examination
- •25.4.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •25.4.2 Therapy
- •25.4.2.1 Case Analysis
- •25.4.2.2 Treatment
- •25.4.3 Prognosis
- •25.5 Expert Comments
- •References
- •26.1.1 Introduction
- •26.1.2 Case Background
- •26.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •26.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •26.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •26.1.3 Therapy
- •26.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •26.1.3.2 Treatment
- •26.1.4 Prognosis
- •26.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •27.1.1 Introduction
- •27.1.2 Case Background
- •27.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •27.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •27.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •27.1.3 Therapy
- •27.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •27.1.3.2 Treatment
- •27.1.4 Prognosis
- •27.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •28.1.1 Introduction
- •28.1.2 Case Background
- •28.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •28.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •28.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •28.1.3 Therapy
- •28.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •28.1.3.2 Treatment
- •28.1.3.3 Postoperative Pathology
- •28.1.4 Prognosis
- •28.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •29.1.1 Introduction
- •29.1.2 Case Background
- •29.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •29.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •29.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •29.1.3 Therapy
- •29.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •29.1.3.2 Treatment
- •29.1.4 Prognosis
- •29.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •30.1.1 Introduction
- •30.1.2 Case Background
- •30.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •30.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •30.1.3 Therapy
- •30.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •30.1.3.2 Treatment
- •30.1.4 Prognosis
- •30.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •31.1.1 Introduction
- •31.1.2 Case Background
- •31.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •31.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •31.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •31.1.3 Therapy
- •31.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •31.1.3.2 Treatment
- •31.1.4 Prognosis
- •31.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •32.1.1 Introduction
- •32.1.2 Case Background
- •32.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •32.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •32.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •32.1.3 Therapy
- •32.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •32.1.3.2 Treatment
- •32.1.4 Prognosis
- •32.2 Expert Comments
- •References
- •33.1.1 Introduction
- •33.1.2 Case Background
- •33.1.2.2 Physical Examination
- •33.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •33.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •33.1.3 Therapy
- •33.1.3.1 Case Analysis
- •33.1.3.2 Therapy
- •33.1.4 Prognosis
- •33.2.1 Case Background
- •33.2.1.2 Physical Examination
- •33.2.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •33.2.1.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
- •33.2.2 Therapy
- •33.2.2.1 Case Analysis
- •33.2.2.2 Treatment
- •33.2.3 Prognosis
- •33.3.1 Case Background
- •33.3.1.2 Physical Examination
- •33.3.1.3 Auxiliary Examination
- •33.3.1.4 Primary Diagnosis
- •33.3.2 Therapy
- •33.3.2.1 Case Analysis
- •33.3.2.2 Treatment
- •33.3.2.3 Postoperative Pathology
- •33.3.3 Prognosis
- •33.3.4.4 Rhabdomyosarcoma
- •33.4 Expert Comments
- •References

25 Therapy forAdvanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
177
13. Xu H, Chen L, Shao Y, Zhu D, Zhi X, Zhang Q, Li F, Xu J, Liu
X, Xu Z. Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in the
genetic analysis of patients with advanced GIST. Mol Cancer
Ther. 2018;17(1):290–6. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535- 7163.
MCT- 17- 0436.
14. Liu MC, Oxnard GR, Klein EA, Swanton C, Seiden MV,
CCGA Consortium. Sensitive and specic multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free
DNA. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(6):745–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
annonc.2020.02.011.

Management ofTargeted Drug Adverse
Reaction
BoNi, JianLi, andLinShen
26
Keywords
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor · Targeted therapy
Adverse reaction
26.1 Case 36 A63-Year-Old Woman
withGIST Who Suered
fromInterstitial Lung Disease During
Imatinib-Targeted Therapy
BoNi and JianLi
26.1.1 Introduction
Imatinib is an effective treatment for GIST. The majority
of patients with GIST benet from imatinib treatment, but
adverse reaction is inevitable during the course of medication. A small number of patients cannot tolerate imatinib due to serious adverse reaction, so they require
second-line therapies. Targeted drugs can cause interstitial lung disease, mainly by affecting the EGFR signal
pathway, but the mechanism is not completely clear.
Similar ndings have been found in the pulmonary toxicity of other chemotherapeutic drugs, such as gemcitabine
and paclitaxel.
26.1.2 Case Background
The patient, a 63-year-old woman, presented with right
abdominal pain and diagnosed as a hysteromyoma at the
local hospital in June 2006. Gynecological exploratory surgery found small intestinal tumor. There was no tumor rupture or peritoneal or liver metastasis. A complete tumor
resection was performed. Postoperative pathology testing
revealed a small intestinal GIST, 4 cm × 3 cm in size, with a
mitotic count >5/50 HPF. Immunohistochemistry showed
CD117 (+), DOG1 (+), desmin (−), SMA (−), S-100 (−).
Genetic detection showed a point mutation in KIT exon 11.
Imatinib 600mg/d was taken orally after surgery, and mild
chest tightness occurred after 45days of treatment. Chest CT
showed mild interstitial affecting both pulmonary lobes
(Fig.26.1).
Imatinib was reduced to 400mg/d, but the symptoms of
chest tightness were aggravated, and fever occurred.
Re-evaluation of the chest CT scan revealed extensive groundglass opacities affecting both pulmonary lobes (Fig.26.2).
Upon discontinuation of imatinib and initiation of symptomatic management, there was a subsequent resolution of
the interstitial lesions in both pulmonary lobes (Fig.26.3).
Approximately 1 year after imatinib withdraw, a CT
revealed multiple pelvic metastases. And she was admitted to
the Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Peking
University Cancer Hospital.
B.Ni
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai
Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
J.Li (*) · L.Shen
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University
Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
e-mail: lin100@medmail.com.cn
© People’s Medical Publishing House, PR of China 2024
K. Tao, H. Cao (eds.), Clinical Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9392-5_26
179

180
Fig. 26.1 Chest CT showed mild interstitial changes affecting both pulmonary lobes with pleural effusion
B. Ni et al.
Fig. 26.2 Chest CT showed extensive ground-glass opacities affecting both pulmonary lobes
Fig. 26.3 Resolution of bilateral pulmonary interstitial lesions
26.1.2.1 Past History andFamily History
The patient reported no previous history of hypertension,
infectious diseases, such as hepatitis and tuberculosis, heart
disease, diabetes, trauma, food and drug allergies, blood
transfusions, and genetic history.
26.1.2.2 Physical Examination
The patient had mild anemia, no jaundice on the skin or
mucous membrane of the whole body, and a at abdomen.
An abdominal surgical incision is visible. There were no
varicose veins on the abdominal wall, no intestinal type, soft

26 Management ofTargeted Drug Adverse Reaction
181
abdomen, rebound tenderness, and the liver and spleen were
not palpable below the costal margin. Murphy’s sign was
negative, no mobile voiced sound, no palpable mass, normal
bowel sounds, and no sounds of air or water.
26.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
Blood Routine WBC 6.45×109 /L, RBC 3.6×1012/L ↓, Hb
106g/L ↓, PLT 148×109/L, NEUT% 66.5%, LY% 31.5%.
26.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
1. Postoperative GIST
2. Multiple pelvic metastases
3. Interstitial lung disease
4. Hysteromyoma
26.1.3 Therapy
26.1.3.1 Case Analysis
According to the medical history, the previous pulmonary
interstitial brosis was caused by imatinib therapy. The pelvic multiple metastases of GIST were not candidates for
surgical treatment. Imatinib treatment was expected to be
effective, but it was also likely to lead to repeat interstitial
lung disease (ILD). Considering his families’ willings, it
was recommended that sunitinib 37.5mg/d be administered
as second-line treatment. While the patient decided the
rechallenge of imatinib treatment, a reduced dose of 300
mg/d was administrated, and close observation of adverse
reaction was performed.
26.1.3.2 Treatment
After more than 2-week treatment of 300 mg/d imatinib, the
patient felt mild respiratory distress. A CT scan showed a
small amount of ground-glass opacity affecting the left pulmonary lobe. Considering the recurrence of drug-related
ILD, the targeted therapy with imatinib was replaced with
37.5 mg/d sunitinib.
26.1.4 Prognosis
Upon re-examination, the metastatic burden was slightly
smaller than before and there was no obvious pulmonary
interstitial change on chest CT, but the adverse reaction of
hand-foot erythrodysesthesia was obvious, resulting in the
reduction of sunitinib to 25 and 37.5mg/d alternately. The
patient has been taking medicine intermittently until now.
The CT scan obtained at the most recent follow-up revealed
stable pelvic metastases, with no evidence of interstitial pulmonary changes.
26.1.5 Experience ofDiagnosis andTherapy
The adverse reaction of imatinib are important factors which
determine medication compliance. Many patients reduce their
imatinib compliance due to improper treatment of drug
adverse reaction, which affects the treatment effect [1].
Interstitial lung disease is a relatively rare adverse reaction
during the TKI treatment of patients with GIST. However,
once diagnosed as interstitial lung disease caused by TKI, the
patients need close attention and appropriate treatment.
Limited literature suggests that interstitial lung disease may
affect individuals of Asian descent more than other races and
males more than females [2]. It is proved that the existence of
interstitial lung disease before treatment is the risk factor of
this disease resulted from TKI therapy [3]. The mechanisms of
interstitial lung disease caused by TKI remain debatable. The
main hypotheses are hypersensitivity reaction, the pharmacological action of TKI, the inhibition of PDGFRA inducing
pulmonary brosis, and inammatory cell inltration [4, 5].
The symptoms are usually fever of unknown origin, cough,
dyspnea, and hypereosinophilia. Chest X-ray, CT, and highresolution CT may help diagnose interstitial lung disease.
Typical CT characteristics include ground-glass attenuation,
irregular liner or reticular areas of attenuation with bronchiectasis and bronchiectasis. Among the thousands of GISTs
treated in our center, only four cases of pulmonary interstitial
brosis secondary to imatinib therapy have been encountered,
which is consistent with the overall incidence reported in the
literature [6]. The patient experienced severe pulmonary interstitial brosis, and the timing of occurrence was consistent
with a previous literature report. Regardless of the improper
selection of the initial treatment dose, the time and course of
pulmonary interstitial brosis showed a signicant correlation
with imatinib treatment. At the same time, mild interstitial
changes in both lungs were seen in the rst CT.From the perspective of treatment, the possibility of adverse reactions
related to imatinib treatment should be considered at that time,
and imatinib treatment should be terminated immediately,
which may avoid the aggravation of subsequent lung injury. In
this case, the patient’s condition was relieved after drug withdrawal, so it could be determined that imatinib treatment
caused the interstitial pneumonia. For such patients with serious side effects, they should resolutely choose to stop the drug
before further treatment. For example, the continued application of imatinib can lead to repeated attacks of interstitial
pneumonia, severe pulmonary brosis, and respiratory failure.
Since the blood concentration of imatinib had not been measured prior to ceasing therapy, only sunitinib (second-line
drug) could be selected.
The measurement of blood drug concentration is an
important index to evaluate the bioavailability of drugs. At

182
B. Ni et al.
the same time, we have also found that a higher blood drug
concentration is associated with more serious side effects.
Given our understanding of imatinib’s bioavailability, for
patients experiencing severe adverse reaction, we can
adjust the dosage based on blood concentration levels. This
allows us to reduce the severity of adverse reaction,
enabling patients to use the medication more safely and
rationally.
26.2 Expert Comments
LinShen
The reported incidence of interstitial lung disease, also
known as interstitial pneumonia, caused by imatinib is about
0.5% [6]. In addition, interstitial lung disease has also been
reported in the course of treatment with many small molecule TKIs, such as getinib and afatinib [7]. Interstitial lung
disease caused by imatinib is mostly reversed after termination of imatinib treatment, without serious complications [8].
Therefore, there is no need to be too concerned about similar
adverse reactions. The key to treatment lies in early evaluation and accurate diagnosis. Once it is diagnosed as lung
injury caused by a TKI, the offending medication should be
ceased immediately [9].
At present, the clinical problem is whether imatinib can
continue to be used for follow-up treatment once it is determined that imatinib causes interstitial lung disease and the
patient’s lung injury recovers.
Among the four patients with interstitial lung disease
encountered in our center, one patient with mild pulmonary
interstitial brosis was treated with imatinib again without
lung injury, and the other three patients, who experienced
relatively severe pulmonary interstitial brosis, had their
therapy replaced with second-line drugs. Therefore, the follow- up treatment after the incidence of interstitial lung disease should be comprehensively considered in combination
with various factors, such as the patient’s condition, GIST
status, status of basic lung diseases, severity of pulmonary
interstitial brosis, patient’s willingness to continue treat-
ment, and replacement second-line drug treatment. The
changes of chest CT should also be closely monitored during
follow-up treatment.
References
1. Blay JY, Rutkowski P. Adherence to imatinib therapy in
patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Treat Rev.
2014;40(2):242–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.07.005.
2. Loong HH, Yeo W.Imatinib-induced interstitial lung disease and
sunitinib-associated intra-tumour haemorrhage. Hong Kong Med J.
2008;14(6):495–8.
3. Bergeron A, Bergot E, Vilela G, Ades L, Devergie A, Espérou
H, Socié G, Calvo F, Gluckman E, Ribaud P, Rousselot P, Tazi
A. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis related to imatinib mesylate. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(20):4271–2. https://doi.org/10.1200/
JCO.2002.99.179.
4. Yamasawa H, Sugiyama Y, Bando M, Ohno S.Drug-induced pneumonitis associated with imatinib mesylate in a patient with idiopathic pulmonary brosis. Respiration. 2008;75(3):350–4. https://
doi.org/10.1159/000091272.
5. Min JH, Lee HY, Lim H, Ahn MJ, Park K, Chung MP, Lee KS.Druginduced interstitial lung disease in tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a review on current insight.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;68(5):1099–109. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00280- 011- 1737- 2.
6. Ohnishi K, Sakai F, Kudoh S, Ohno R. Twenty-seven cases of
drug-induced interstitial lung disease associated with imatinib
mesylate. Leukemia. 2006;20(6):1162–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/
sj.leu.2404207.
7. Ohmori T, Yamaoka T, Ando K, Kusumoto S, Kishino Y, Manabe R,
Sagara H.Molecular and clinical features of EGFR-TKI-associated
lung injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):792. https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms22020792.
8. Go SW, Kim BK, Lee SH, Kim TJ, Huh JY, Lee JM, Hah JH, Kim
DW, Cho MJ, Kim TW, Kang JY.Successful rechallenge with imatinib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia who previously
experienced imatinib mesylate induced pneumonitis. Successful
rechallenge with imatinib in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia who previously experienced imatinib mesylate induced pneumonitis. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2013;75(6):256–9. https://doi.
org/10.4046/trd.2013.75.6.256.
9. Li J, Wang M, Zhang B, Wu X, Lin TL, Liu XF, Zhou Y, Zhang XH,
Xu H, Shen LJ, Zou J, Lu P, Zhang D, Gu WJ, Zhang MX, Pan J,
Cao H, Chinese Society of Surgeons for Gastrointestinal Stromal
Tumor of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Chinese consensus on management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated side
effects in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol.
2018;24(46):5189–202. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5189.

Part VI
Management of Patients with Special
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Senile Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
withCoronary Heart Disease
ChunZhuang, TianlongLing, andGuoqingLiao
27
Keywords
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor · Advanced age ·
Coronary artery bypass grafting · Surgery
27.1 Case 37 An83-Year-Old Man
withGastric GIST withSimultaneous
Gastrointestinal Bleeding
andCoronary Three-Vessel Disease
ChunZhuang and TianlongLing
27.1.1 Introduction
With the increase in the elderly population year by year, population aging has become an increasingly serious social
problem in China. Often, GISTs are diagnosed in middleaged and elderly people. The clinical characteristics and
treatment for elderly patients with GIST have certain particularity, which needs close attention from clinicians. Due to
the common delay of treatment in elderly patients with GIST,
the symptoms are often obvious, and the tumor stage is late.
In addition, elderly patients are often complicated by various
chronic diseases or organ dysfunction, which makes treatment more difcult. For some elderly patients with GIST and
signicant visceral insufciency, it is necessary to carry out
diagnosis and treatment through multidisciplinary cooperation (i.e., with a MDT).
C.Zhuang · T.Ling (*)
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai
Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
G.Liao
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central
South University, Changsha, China
e-mail: liaoguoqing@medmail.com.cn
27.1.2 Case Background
The patient, an 83-year-old man, was admitted to the local
hospital on May 11, 2016, for investigation of repeated black
stool for 2 months with dizziness and fatigue. Gastroscopy
revealed possible GIST and the patient was admitted to the
hospital for surgery. Preoperative coronary CT angiography
showed coronary atherosclerosis, limited occlusion of the
proximal part of the left anterior descending artery, severe stenosis of the local lumen of the proximal part of the right coronary artery, and multiple mild stenosis of the remaining lumen.
The attending physician considered that there was high risk
for surgery and did not recommend surgical treatment at that
time. On July 27, 2016, the patient visited Renji Hospital
Afliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
and underwent coronary angiography, which indicated coronary heart disease and serious lesions of three coronary arteries. Because the patient had serious lesions in three coronary
arteries and gastric GIST with chronic bleeding, after MDT
discussion, the patient decided to have surgery for both conditions at the same time and was admitted to the hospital.
27.1.2.1 Past History andFamily History
The patient had a >20-year history of hypertension which
was controlled with drugs. The patient reported no history of
drug allergies, their parents were deceased, and there was no
similar medical history in the family.
27.1.2.2 Physical Examination
The patient’s vital signs were stable, the patient exhibited
apparent anemia, and the skin and mucous membrane were
free of yellow staining. The abdomen was at and soft, with
no tenderness, rebound tenderness, palpable abdominal
mass, or guarding. The bowel sounds were normal.
27.1.2.3 Auxiliary Examination
Gastroscopy A 4.0cm×4.0cm lesion from the lesser cur-
vature of the stomach protruded intraluminally. The top of
© People’s Medical Publishing House, PR of China 2024
K. Tao, H. Cao (eds.), Clinical Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9392-5_27
185

186
C. Zhuang et al.
the lesion was ulcerated, and covered with dirty moss, the
mucosa was fragile, and bled easily. Gastroendoscopic diagnosis: Gastric tumor, possible GIST.
Enhanced CT of Upper and Lower Abdomen Soft tissue
mass, possible GIST, on the lesser curvature of stomach,
3.5cm×3.2cm in size, accompanied by enlargement of sur-
rounding lymph nodes, gallstones, and cholecystitis (Fig.27.1).
Cardiac Doppler Color Ultrasound The result revealed
left atrial enlargement, thickening of the basal segment of the
ventricular septum, calcication of the mitral and aortic
valves, normal left ventricular systolic function, decreased
left ventricular diastolic function, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 63%.
Coronary Angiography The result revealed coronary
heart disease, serious lesions of three coronary arteries,
posterior occlusion of the rst diagonal branch in the middle of the anterior descending branch, posterior occlusion
of the rst blunt marginal branch in the middle of the circumex branch, and 95% stenosis at the opening of the
right coronary artery (Fig.27.2).
27.1.2.4 Preliminary Diagnosis
1. Soft tissue tumor on the lesser curvature of the stomach:
likely GIST
2. Coronary atherosclerotic multi-vessel disease
3. Hypertension, grade 3, very high risk
4. Gallstones
Fig. 27.1 Abdominal CT revealed a soft tissue mass on the lesser curvature of the stomach

27 Senile Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors withCoronary Heart Disease
Fig. 27.2 Coronary angiography showed severe lesions in the three coronary arteries
27.1.3 Therapy
27.1.3.1 Case Analysis
The patient was an elderly man who was treated for gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroscopy and imaging showed GIST on
the lesser curvature of the stomach, and the surgical indication was clear. However, the general health of the patient was
poor, the three branches of the coronary artery were seriously diseased, and the operation risk was very high. The
MDT discussions suggested that postoperative anticoagulant
therapy following coronary stent implantation could worsen
gastrointestinal bleeding. Simultaneous coronary artery
bypass grafting and gastric GIST resection was, therefore,
considered. Due to the high risk of general anesthesia and
operation, close monitoring would be required during the
perioperative period.
Fig. 27.3 The gross specimen of tumor specimens
187
27.1.3.2 Treatment
On August 15, 2016, non-stop coronary artery bypass grafting was performed under general anesthesia. The appearance
of coronary lesions was consistent with the preoperative
angiography. Aortic calcication was severe. The operation
was performed routinely, and the left internal mammary
artery (LIMA) was abandoned due to poor blood ow. With
the help of easy buckle, shunt bolt and non-stop jumping
bypass xator, coronary artery by-pass surgery was performed. Subsequently, partial gastrectomy was performed
for GIST removal. Intraoperatively, the tumor was found on
the small curvature of the stomach below the gastric cardia,
with a diameter of 4.5cm and ulceration with bleeding on
the surface. The gastric body was separated along the greater
curvature of the gastric fundus, the left side of the cardia was
freed, and the hepatogastric ligament was separated from the
mass. The serosa of the gastric wall was incised on the lesser
curvature, and the mass, with envelope, was completely
removed. The gastric mucosa was continuously sutured with
2-0 absorbable suture, and the seromuscular layer was
sutured intermittently. The operation was successful, and the
patient was treated with antibiotics, cardiotonic agents, coronary dilation, and antiplatelet therapy (Fig.27.3).
27.1.3.3 Postoperative Pathology andGenetic
Testing
Pathological Diagnosis Gastric GIST, 4.0 cm × 3.0 cm
×2.5cm in size, mitotic count <2/50 HPF, classied as low
risk according to the modied NIH criteria.
Immunohistochemistry CD117 (+), CD34 (+), DOG-1
(+), SMA (−), S-100 (−), Ki-67 (+), ALK (−), β-catenin (+).
Genetic Testing Mutations in exon 11 of KIT: a heterozy-
gous mutation in codon 555, GTA>CCA, resulting in change
of valine to proline; a heterozygous mutation in codon 556,
CAG>CAT, change of glutamine to histidine; and a loss of
codons 557–559, resulting in loss of coding amino acids
tryptophan, lysine, and valine. Exons 9, 13 and 17 of KIT and
exons 12 and 18 of PDGFRA were wild type.
27.1.4 Prognosis
The patient was given a semiliquid diet for 5days after surgery and was discharged from the hospital 12days after the
operation. He did not receive postoperative imatinib adju-

188
C. Zhuang et al.
vant therapy. Until December 2018, outpatient and telephone
follow-up showed that the patient had good quality of life
and did not complain of obvious discomfort.
27.1.5 Experience ofDiagnosis andTherapy
The elderly patient in this case had been admitted to the local
hospital and surgery for GIST was planned. The ejection
fraction of preoperative color Doppler ultrasound was greater
than 60%, which did not show clear surgical contraindications. However, during a preoperative evaluation, the anesthesiologist noted that the patient experienced chest pain
when fatigued. Therefore, the attending physician suspended
the operation and requested coronary computed tomography
angiography, which revealed serious coronary lesions and
led to the cancellation of the procedure. This highlights that
if the preoperative evaluation is not detailed and comprehensive, the consequences may be severe and life-threatening.
There are an increasing number of cases of gastrointestinal
malignancies with major comorbidities [1]. Malignant digestive tract tumors and coronary artery disease both require
timely treatment. When the above two diseases coexist, which
condition requires the highest priority treatment should be
determined according to the actual situation. Coronary
multi-branch lesions may lead to sudden cardiac death at any
time, which should be treated rst [2]. The biological behavior
of GIST is relatively inert. If this patient had no ulcer bleeding
related to the tumor, coronary stent implantation could have
been performed rst, and gastric tumor resection could be performed within a time limit after the heart condition was stable.
However, this patient had gastrointestinal bleeding and the
requirement for anticoagulant therapy after coronary stent
implantation would aggravate gastrointestinal bleeding [3].
There were contradictions for treatment, which also presented
difculty in the treatment of this case. Finally, the results of
investigations showed that simultaneous coronary artery
bypass grafting and gastric tumor resection were reasonable
treatment options for this case.
Focusing on the diagnosis and treatment plan of middleaged and elderly patients in this case, the hospital organized
MDT discussions before and after investigations. After the
rst discussion, it was decided to assess the severity of coronary artery disease by coronary angiography rst, and at the
second discussion, a consensus was reached to operate on
both conditions at the same time according to the results of
coronary angiography and formulate a specic implementation plan. Representatives from the gastrointestinal surgery,
cardiology, cardiac surgery, anesthesiology, critical medi-
cine, oncology, gastroenterology, clinical nutrition, and other
relevant departments participated in the MDT collaborative
diagnosis and treatment of this case. Through the whole
treatment process, various disciplines worked seamlessly to
carry out careful perioperative preparations for the treatment, ensuring the success of the treatment. Patients have the
opportunity to get the best treatment choice from the MDT
discussion, and a treatment plan jointly formulated by many
experts also effectively reduces the medical risk.
In this case, the GIST was located on the lesser curvature
below the cardia, with a diameter of about 4cm. The nal
surgical scheme was to perform coronary artery bypass
grafting rst, followed by abdominal surgery. Abdominal
surgery was performed using open gastrectomy with an incision of the gastric wall and complete resection along the outside of the tumor capsule. The following points should be
considered in the selection of operation methods: (1) The
risk of coronary artery bypass grafting is greater than that of
abdominal surgery, and as it is aseptic surgery, needs to be
performed rst. Additionally, coronary artery bypass grafting should be carried out rst to minimize the risk of cardiovascular accident during the operation; (2) Given the patient’s
advanced age and cardiopulmonary dysfunction, laparoscopic surgery was not recommended after coronary bypass.
(3) Surgeons should choose the most direct and effective way
of performing laparotomy to avoid prolonged operation time
and the impact of excessive surgical trauma on patients.
27.2 Expert Comments
GuoqingLiao
The clinical manifestations of GIST are nonspecic. Elderly
patients visit relatively late, and their condition is often complicated by diseases of the respiratory and circulatory systems, and the operative risk is relatively high [4]. Additionally,
elderly patients often have poor nutritional status, which can
slow postoperative recovery. At the same time, basic diseases
also seriously affect the recovery of patients. Elderly patients
often face challenges with quality of life and may struggle
with treatment compliance, making regular follow-up challenging. Therefore, for elderly GIST patients, we should
strive to improve the early diagnosis rate, make a clear diagnosis before operation, fully evaluate the operation risk, and
actively carry out MDT consultation to reduce the surgical
risk [5]. Reasonable and standardized comprehensive treatment should be given after operation to improve the prognosis of elderly patients with GIST.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
