Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_705_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
40
R. N. ThaliaAttinger et al.
(HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and prior venous bypass to
increase blood ow to the leg. He was admitted to
the Plastic Surgery (LIMB) service with several
consulting specialties: general internal medicine
(GIM) for blood pressure and glucose control,
infectious disease (ID) for antibiotic therapy, vascular surgery to evaluate blood ow, and acute
pain service (APS) for pain management. An
angiogram was performed which showed little to
no blood ow to the right lower extremity and in
light of failed vascular intervention in the past
there was no further intervention possible. Given
the extent of the wounds and level of infection of
both the bone and the tissue the team recommended an amputation. After years of pain, infection, and multiple surgeries to the foot the patient
agreed to proceed with a below knee amputation.
The patient rst underwent a drainage amputation where cultures were taken and then dressed
with a negative pressure wound therapy (NWPT)
or vacuum assisted closure (VAC) device along
with a knee immobilizer to protect the residual
limb and prevent contractures, intravenous antibiotics were ordered by ID and physical therapy
began to work with the patient to assess his physical abilities. On the third post-operative day the
patient returned for his completion BKA along
with targeted muscle reinnervation.
Plan
Prior to surgery the patient met with prosthetists,
who gave him the opportunity to learn about the
process going forward and begin to get a glimpse
as to what life was going to look like for him
after surgery. Whenever possible, we try to
arrange peer support during the hospitalization;
sometimes this comes in the form of our monthly
virtual amputee support group, other times the
prosthetists are able to arrange for one-on-one
meetings. These visits/conversations with
patients prior to surgery is an invaluable resource
we often take advantage of for emotional support
during this difcult process. On the day of surgery, or the night prior, APS will place perineural catheters in the operative leg for localized
pain management in hopes of decreasing the
need for narcotic and improving overall pain
control.
The Case Manager met with the patient to
perform an initial assessment for discharge
needs. During the interview, the patient stated he
lived with his spouse in a multi-level home but
was able to have rst oor set up. He had been
receiving wound care from a home health agency
three times a week and using a rolling walker for
ambulation. Initial physical and occupational
therapy evaluation recommended acute rehab
(AR) placement. It is generally our recommendation that all new amputees spend at least 7–10
days in an AR to help retrain the mind to
acknowledge the missing limb. This helps to
reduce falls and in turn reduce risk of dehiscence
and hematoma to the residual limb. For those
who do not meet criteria for AR (the ability to
participate in at least 3 h per day of physical
therapy), we recommend a subacute rehab facility (SAR) with eventual upgrade to AR.CM discussed referral process and the patient chose
three facilities that are on par (within network)
with his insurance. The patient and his wife were
informed that he would transfer to the rst
accepting facility with a bed, authorized by
insurance when medically ready for discharge.
Typically, patients stay in the hospital for 4–5
days post-surgery at which time the incisional
VAC is removed to assess the incision prior to
discharge, pain can be well controlled and all
surgical drains can be removed. A discharge
summary outlining nal ID recommendations
which were oral antibiotics as the infected tissue
was completely removed by nature of an amputation, wound care, patient was placed in a short
term, one time use incisional Prevena VAC
which stays in place for 7 days and is then
changed to a dry sterile dressing, and an effective oral pain regimen was written for AR to follow. A follow-up in the outpatient clinic was
scheduled for 10 days from discharge.
Additionally, all amputees are invited to attend a
virtual support group which meets monthly. This
is especially benecial if the patient happens to
still be in- patient at the time of the meeting as
they are able to obtain real-time peer support.

3 Case Management oftheComplex Limb Salvage Admission
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
41
The Moderately Complex
Discharge: TheFree-Flap Patient
Background onFree Flaps
Patients undergoing a free tissue transfer (free
flap) have the longest, often most complex
hospitalizations. They undergo multiple
debridements prior to their final closure, as
well as a number of pre-operative clearances
and screenings such as angiography, vein mapping, lab studies to assess for any underlying
hypercoagulable states, and cardiac clearance
given the length of the surgery which often
requires over 6h under anesthesia. Their frequent need for a heparin drip and antibiotics
necessitates regular lab draws via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line early
in their hospital course. The sooner we can
identify these patients and begin the interdisciplinary coordination of care the better for
both mental and physical health. As previously
mentioned, remaining non- weight bearing and
offloading any pressure to the flap is of the
utmost importance whether that be in a mulitpodus boot with strict adherence to non- weight
bearing or with the use of external fixation.
Whether or not a patient can mentally handle
external fixation is always a challenge.
Regardless of offloading method these patients
require long term IV antibiotics, frequent
wound care, and intense physical therapy. The
post-operative period is an arduous one.
Patients are kept NPO (nothing by mouth) for
the first night in case an emergent revision surgery is required. They are kept in bed, under a
bair hugger (warming blanket to improve
blood flow), with a continuous audible
Doppler along with a Vioptix Doppler to
assess skin oxygen saturation for 2 days postop. At that time, they can slowly begin to get
out of bed to a chair with continuous leg elevation until they are once week post-op and can
begin the dangle protocol where the patient
progressively places the limb in a dependent
position. Most free-flap patient remain in the
hospital for approximately 12–14 days post
final surgery.
Case
The patient is a 65-year-old African American
male with a past medical history of IDDM
HTN, CHF, prior left BKA and CKD Stage III,
who presented to the wound center with right
plantar heel ulcer. He underwent several
debridements in order to get the wound bed
clean and the aforementioned screenings prior
to receiving the free ap. His post-operative
course was uncomplicated but long and mentally taxing.
Case management met with the patient and
determined that he lived alone with his small dog
in an apartment. The apartment had approximately 20 steps to enter and no elevator access.
His treatment regimen required Daptomycin, a
notoriously expensive antibiotic, to be
administered IV daily for approximately 4 weeks.
He refused external xation and nursing reported
he was unable to maintain his non-weight bearing
status (“he walks all over that foot”). He had initially agreed to AR; however, due to delays in bed
availability he become increasingly dissatised
and eventually insisted on going home, as he was
worried about his dog who was being watched by
a neighbor.
Plan
The patient was placed in a total contact cast to
ofoad the ap as best as possible. The cast
itself meant that the clothes he has worn into
the hospital were not suitable and he had no
one to bring him a proper set. Because of the
PICC, he was unable to use traditional crutches
and so he was ordered a walker and platform
crutches as well as rented a knee scooter. Given
the high cost of daptomycin, SW was consulted
to assess the patient for nancial need and submitted a request to the case management
department to cover the cost of the daptomycin
through our contracted home infusion company. Social work was also able to provide him
the necessary clothes for discharge and to help
guide him through the application process for
medical transportation and community food
assistance. Weekly follow-up visits were set up
to ensure regular follow-up visits and cast
changes.

42
R. N. ThaliaAttinger et al.
The Complex Discharge
Case
The patient is a 31-year-old man with a PMH of
IDDM and substance abuse who presented to
clinic with a right hallux abscess and cellulitis
with gangrene, noted at the dorsal aspect of the
hallux. Osteomyelitis of the great toe was identied radiographically. He underwent several
debridements and ultimately a rst metatarsal
head resection and amputation of the second to
fourth digits. Given the level of infection a 4-week
course of outpatient IV antibiotics was initially
outlined. Ideally, he would remain non- weight
bearing but both nursing and physical therapy
documented that he is unable to do so. PT recommended SAR for the immediate post- operative
period to help reinforce non-weight bearing and
overall strengthening and conditioning along with
wound care and antibiotic therapy. He was notably aggressive toward staff throughout his stay,
often threatening to leave against medical advice
(AMA) and intermittently refusing care. Despite
his frequent outbursts and non- compliance, he
was deemed competent by psychiatry.
Case management met with the patient and
learned that he was undomiciled and lived in his
car, delivering food for a living. Patient is adamant that he wants to go home to “deal with
things” which was worrisome to the medical
team, given that his surgery was on the right foot,
and placing a total contact cast to ofoad the incision would make driving hazardous. To further
complicate matters, the patient had no health
insurance, so social work helped assist in completing an application for Medicaid or disability;
however, sadly, the patient was “over income,”
that is, his income, while low, was sufcient to
disqualify him from Medicare eligibility. The
SW, CM, and LIMB team spoke with him several
times in order to convince him that going home
(i.e., to his car) was not a good option, and he
eventually agreed to placement. He was referred
to a medical shelter, homeless hotel program, and
short-term rehab, but was denied at all facilities
due to his substance abuse history and documented combative behaviors.
Plan
This patient had several outside case managers
with whom the social worker and case manager
collaborated throughout his admission and eventually a safe discharge plan was ultimately agreed
upon by all involved. After much deliberation his
cousin agreed to let him stay with him temporarily. Our fear was that this welcome may be short
lived and therefore sent him home with dressings
and medications that were as low maintenance as
possible while still providing him the best possible chance to heal. He was placed in a well- padded
profore (multilayer compression) dressing9 with
a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot to ofoad
the forefoot. Given his substance abuse history he
was placed on oral antibiotics and set up with
weekly follow-up visits to ensure proper wound
care and frequent monitoring. Much to everyone’s surprise and delight this gentleman went on
to heal beautifully.
Other Barriers
Navigating the complex world of health insurance is an unfortunate reality in health care today.
The limb salvage patient is, more often than not,
a chronically ill patient whose time is spent in
and out of hospitals and rehabs. This compounded
with the fact that we work with patients from the
District of Columbia, Virginia, and Maryland
which requires early inquiry on the part of case
management and social work to help carve out
the best path. Patients having no insurance or
being out of rehab days or not qualifying for
home health aide can drastically shift the discharge plan at the nth hour.
The case manager and social worker review
the patient’s insurance status. If uninsured, the
social worker refers the patient to DECO for
assistance in applying for Medicaid or Emergency
Medicaid. If the patient does not have a secondary insurance, the patient is also referred to
DECO for possible Medicaid for secondary. In
9
https://www.smith-nephew.com/key-products/advanced-
wound- management/profore/.

3 Case Management oftheComplex Limb Salvage Admission
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
43
the case that the patient is undocumented and
unable to obtain Medicaid, the social worker can
then make a referral to Catholic Charities for
assistance with follow-up care and will consider
any potential needs: clothing for discharge, transportation, assistance with home medications at
discharge.
The social worker is also consulted to help
assess the patient’s home situation. If the patient
is particularly vulnerable, homeless, or older and
lives alone, the social worker considers what supports are available. If the patient has DC
Medicaid, they may be eligible for a home health
aid, and the social worker will collaborate with
the limb team in completing paperwork for an
assessment for home health aid service hours. If
the patient needs assisting living, the social
worker will connect the patient and family with
agencies like A Place for Mom or Care Patrol. If
the patient needs AR or SAR, the case manager
takes the lead in making referrals and facilitating
rehab discharges with the social worker remaining available as needed. If the patient does not
have insurance, does not qualify for Medicaid,
and/or is out of rehab days, the social worker will
refer the patient to the case management directors for a subsidy for home health aids through
Georgetown Home Care, may refer to the subsidized Georgetown NP Program, or subsidize necessary medications needed to ensure the patient
has a safe and successful discharge.
No account of the CM/SW aspects of care
would be faithful to real-life circumstances,
should it fail to acknowledge the infrequent but
unfortunate situations when the best efforts and
intentions of physicians, nurses, and CM/SW—
to treat with medical excellence and to arrange
placement with diligence and compassion—are
thwarted by a patient’s next-of-kin or other surrogate decision maker. A surrogate may suddenly
become unavailable to participate, for instance,
in AR or SAR site-selection, refuse to make a
selection from these sites despite the discharge
plan being safe and underwritten by insurance, or
fail to be forthcoming on matters nancial.
Reasons for such disengagement by responsible
parties are complex and may be related to cultural, socioeconomic, and demographic dispari-
ties. These situations are challenging and require
the patience and professionalism of all involved—
and the support of hospital administration.
The aforementioned ethics of the care of the
patient also pertain to ministry to the greater
good, especially when hospital beds are scarce
and hospital throughput must be optimized. In
circumstances where a family or other surrogate
becomes unavailable or uncooperative with discharge planning, it is incumbent upon the hospital—and ethically imperative for the patient’s
best interests—that the hospital take expeditious
measures to obtain a court-appointed guardian to
move the patient’s care forward. At our facility
this (thankfully) rare intervention is initiated by
the SW, in consultation with senior administrative physicians, and involves the hospital’s or
system’s legal team and other consultants.
Hospital Administration
andtheLimb Service
It is a common misconception that Length-ofStay reduction and patient throughput responsibility is the sole domain of Case Management. As
noted previously, it is always easier to blame the
“downstream” person, the non-physician, nonnurse members of the team when throughput is
suboptimal and LOS, over budget; however, it
has been our experience that the persistence of
this misunderstanding is at the core of inertia in
the effort to ameliorate all aspects of inpatient
ow. Experience with throughput enhancement
in the COVID-19 era effectively has laid this misconception to rest. In this nal section, we shall
explore the essential role of a robust and engaged
hospital leadership in the provision of responsible and excellent care, while, simultaneously
tending to throughput challenges in an effort to
“keep the doors open,” and thereby to keep the
public served.
As noted, stafng and tasking of CM vary
broadly across institutions and may be driven by
the nature and scope of institution-specic services. For example, hospitals which specialize in
cancer treatment or orthopedic procedures may
have narrower and more specialized scopes of

44
R. N. ThaliaAttinger et al.
CM/SW activities than a full-service facility.
Within a full-service facility, the relative number
and distribution of service line in-patients may
dictate the distribution of CM.Small community
hospitals may use a hybrid model wherein a single CM executes both DP and UR actions,
whereas larger city hospitals or academic medical centers, such as our own, require dedicated,
separate CM and UR specialists to support the
volume and complexity of each work-type. And,
as in all things organizational, budgetary considerations and constraints may inevitably impact
both the number of CM on staff and on how they
are deployed. When it comes to the correct staffing model in any hospital, one size does not necessarily t all.
At our institution we employ differentiated
DP and UR case managers, with 50% of our personnel in each group. CMDP is deployed geographically by hospital wards, with each CMDP
covering two wards. Several internal Performance
Improvement initiatives, all of which maintained
this model, resulted in the uncovering of several
common discharge barriers, but none in a reduction in LOS.More recently, however, a pilot program in which a single CMDP was dedicated to
the Limb Service over a 3-month period resulted
in improved internal customer satisfaction among
physicians and nursing staff; additionally, a 0.9
day reduction in LOS was realized during this
period when compared with a historical control
of the same duration.10 These ndings lend themselves to consideration of funding for an extended
pilot study of similar metrics which might support augmentation of stafng.
Stepping back from the Limb Service specically, more generalized efforts to enhance patient
throughput bear mention, as all service lines may
partake of a collective benet. Just as the medical
and nursing teams collaborate with CM, PT, SW,
and others, so to, proactive engagement by the
hospital administrative team with all service lines
in standardized as well as specic ways brings
programmatic unity to the diversity of clinical
services. The aforementioned Multidisciplinary
Rounding of the Integrated Model of Care initia-
10
T.Deperio and A.Roberts (unpublished data).
tive is one example of a standardized safety and
throughput program that touches all service lines
equally.
Recognizing the toll of both COVID 19 disease and other diseases in the early phase of the
pandemic, a decision was made to maintain full
services at our institution during subsequent
waves of the disease. The challenge to hospitals
within our network was to develop and sustain an
intensive process of safe patient throughput and
efcient discharges. The organizational model to
accomplish this was the formation of physician,
nurse, and case management into executive
leadership triads, and through these groups, to
“connect the dots” of hospital access points, bed
tracking, and individual service line throughput
processes. Relying heavily on a proprietary electronic system of bed reservation, utilization,
cleaning, and reopening, we were able to identify
patients who are “ready for discharge today or
will be by tomorrow.” A list of these patients is
disseminated to the appropriate leadership of service lines daily, and live video teleconferencing
held thrice weekly. The list of all patients ready
or nearly ready for discharge was run daily, discharge barriers identied and escalated promptly.
Additionally, Executive Discharge Rounds were
conducted by physician, nurse, and CM leadership periodically and these rounds uncovered
both barriers and process improvement
opportunities.
The result of these interventions was a signicant reduction in LOS, in the use of full-capacity
beds and the number of ER boarders, and in the
amount of time spent on hospital “red-light.”
Similar MD, RN, and CM triads were created
for our top ve service lines, in-patient volumewise, and the executive triad the leadership triad
met with lower-volume service line leadership
separately. Procedural and consultative services
were engaged and a designation and prioritization of “discharge pending” patients was established for procedure and consultation workow.
The Limb Service, among others, was beneciary
of these enhanced throughput strategies.
Finally, in recent years, we have as a system
begun a program of “repatriation” of patients
from the tertiary care referral center, back to their

3 Case Management oftheComplex Limb Salvage Admission
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
45
hospital-of-origin. At the time of the original
concept development, there was very little, if any,
U.S.-based literature on why one might repatriate
a patient from a tertiary care hospital back to the
more remote community hospital whence he had
been transferred. This has not, to date, been a
common practice in USA. But repatriation of
patients back to their referring hospital has been
part of healthcare delivery in the UK, for some
time, on the very justication that the practice is
necessary to keep the correct number of hospital
beds at the correct level of acuity available to the
most people.
11
It has been for this precise reason that our network has adapted a capacity management strategy that includes the repatriation of select patients
to their hospital of origin, once the tertiary service has been fullled, they are awaiting placement or discharge, and if they consent to the
transfer. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this
practice has been invaluable to minimizing time
on hospital red-light and maintaining patient
referral inow.
Conclusion
The comprehensive, safe, and ethical care of the
complex limb patient, like all patients, involves
collegial coordination among physicians, nurses,
social workers, physical therapists, and others—
all in dialogue with the patient or the patient’s
family. Discharge planning for individual patients
should ideally begin on the day of admission,
with a projected discharge date set in place up
front. Barriers to discharge may be identied and
resolved or escalated via standardized interdisciplinary rounds and thrice weekly conference
calls. Hospital administrators can facilitate the
process by high-level barrier removal; repatriation to referring hospitals is an evolving concept
with great potential for regional or system capacity management. A Service Line-dedicated case
manager stafng model has been shown dramatically to reduce length-of-stay and to improve
internal customer satisfaction.
11
See, for example, https://sunnybrook.ca/
content/?page=discharge-planning-repatriation.

Integrating Inpatient Care toYour
Outpatient Wound Care Center:
Key toSuccessful Patient
Management
NancyR.Megas, KatherineS.Hubley,
andMargaretC.Kugler
4
Introduction
In 2020 the limb salvage service at MGUH performed over 2000 surgeries. In terms of patient
demographics, 34% of their patients required
hemodialysis, 79% were diabetic and 20% suffered from congestive heart failure. These were
not uncomplicated patients. A rotating team of
plastic surgery and podiatric surgery residents is
tasked with caring for and discharging these
patients. As patient volumes grew to MGUH’s
current levels it became evident that the resident
team needed additional support. Within acute
care hospitals, the use of nurse practitioners and
physician assistants is an established model of
care for acute and critically ill patients [1]. With
this in mind, in 2003 a full time nurse practitioner
joined the limb service to work exclusively with
their inpatients. As volumes continued to
increase, two additional nurse practitioners were
added resulting in an inpatient care team of three
nurse practitioners, six to eight residents, and one
fellow. While managing patients’ discharges is a
key focus, the nurse practitioners function in the
same clinical capacity as residents, elding questions and order requests, being paged to the bedside for emergent developments, interfacing with
N. R. Megas (*) · K. S. Hubley · M. C. Kugler
Plastic Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University
Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
e-mail: margaret.c.kugler@gunet.georgetown.edu
other services and responding to patient and family concerns.
As soon as an inpatient NP component was
added the limb service began to benet from
greater continuity of care given the NPs were
permanently part of the service. The NPs also
immediately provided unit-based clinical staff
with a consistent point of contact for the multidisciplinary team. These are the same benets
identied by Kleinpell and her colleagues in
their recent study of the benets of integrating
advanced practice providers in the acute care
setting [1].
Discharge Planning Begins
ontheDay ofAdmission
When a patient is admitted to the limb service,
nurse practitioners begin planning for discharge
by rounding on each new patient and discussing
certain expectations with them (Fig.4.1). These
guidelines address common barriers to discharge
such as: patients wanting to wait for a bed at a
preferred rehab or skilled nursing facility, patients
wanting to be seen by other services for nonemergent conditions, patients without transportation, and patients without a discharge
recommendation from physical therapy. By outlining expectations on the day of admission and
reiterating them regularly, the NPs prepare
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
C. E. Attinger, J. S. Steinberg (eds.), Functional Limb Salvage,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27725-2_4
47

48
GUIDELINES FOR PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL
We understand the enormous burden chronic wounds place on you and your family. We are here to help
heal and in turn, to lessen that burden. To do this we need your cooperation. Here are some simple
guidelines to maximize your success.
Ph
speed your
is an issue ask them to come back once you’ve taken pain medication. Without notes in your chart from
PT and OT you can’t be discharged to rehab. In terms of activity, you should eat at least one of your daily
meals sitting up in a chair and spend at least two hours a day out of bed and in a chair.
Prescribed Diets –
your diet can slow wound healing-especially foods that increase your blood sugar. PLEASE don’t ask
family and friends to bring you food that isn’t on your prescribed diet
Lea
hospital campus– including outside and parking areas. If desired, patients will be provided with
substitutes to help with nicotine withdrawal.
Interaction
We strive to cultivate an environment of respect and responsibility. Patients, providers, and staff all
have the right to safe, civil, and non-derogatory relations. Failure to maintain these relations ma
result in referral to an outside practice for continued care, and dismissal from our practice
Interaction
for conditions other than your wounds. You should follow up with these specialties after discharge. Your
discharge won’t be delayed for you to follow up with them.
Discharge
rehabilitation, or home with home care or outpatient therapy. (See descriptions on the back) If discharge
to a rehab facility is recommended for you, your Case Manager will help you select
your medical needs, your preferences, and what your insurance covers. You will be discharged to the first
of these facilities that accepts you. It’s not possible to delay discharge in order to wait for acceptance at a
specific facility
to travel between their home and physical therapy several times per week.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
ysical and Occupational Therapy and Your Activity Level –Remaining as active as possible will
recovery. You should work with PT and OT therapists whenever they come to see you. If pain
You’ll be prescribed a diet specifically designed to help you heal. Eating foods not on
.
N. R. Megas et al.
ving the Nursing Unit – Smoking/Vaping and use of any tobacco products is prohibited on the entire
with Staff-
with other MGUH Specialties – During your hospitalization, other specialties may see you.
–Depending on your needs, you may be discharged to acute rehabilitation, sub-acute
2-3 facilities based on
· Acute Rehabilitation- Provides intensive rehabilitation and nursing services to patients who can tolerate 3
hours of therapy per day.
· Sub-Acute Rehabilitation Provides rehabilitation and nursing services to patients who can tolerate 1 hour of
therapy a day.
· Home with Home Therapy and Home Nursing –For patients who are “home bound” due to medical or
functional limitations. Your home care team will teach you and your family how to care for you at home. Home nursing
does not provide around-the-clock care.
· Home with Outpatient Therapy- This is for patients who are able to go home, and who are medically cleared
Levels of Post-Hospital Care:
Fig. 4.1 Guidelines for patients admitted to the hospital
y
.

4 Integrating Inpatient Care to Your Outpatient Wound Care Center: Key to Successful Patient…
49
patients to expect to be discharged as soon as
their surgeon deems them ready.
Multidisciplinary Discharge Rounds
Promote Information Sharing
A second element of the NP led discharge process is attendance at daily multidisciplinary discharge rounds (MDRs). These rounds include
case managers, bedside RNs and physical therapists. Multidisciplinary rounds have been demonstrated to improve care coordination including
discharge planning [1]. Multidisciplinary rounds
have also been shown to be an effective means to
facilitate accurate assessments of the social needs
of patients and their families, an area often overlooked in the discharge process [2].
At rounds the NPs advise the case management team of each patient’s surgical plan and
projected date of discharge. The feasibility of
various discharge plans is then assessed. For
example, despite being recommended for discharge home by the physical therapy team, certain patients requiring complex wound care and/
or IV antibiotics may require discharge to a
skilled nursing facility. Input from a patient’s
bedside nurses is crucial in these discussions as
they are the most reliable resources regarding a
patient’s abilities and temperament. The bedside
nurse also often provides valuable information
regarding variables that can lead to discharge
failures such as family dynamics or a change in
living arrangements.
When vetting possible discharge options the
NPs draw on their experience with particular
types of surgery to frequently advocate for disposition to an acute rehabilitation or skilled nursing
facility. For example, young healthy patients, status post below knee amputations are often recommended for discharge to their home. Too often,
though, these patients experience falls in the
home especially after awakening in the middle of
the night. Invariably they report they simply forgot about their amputation. NPs will advocate for
transition to acute rehab before going home to
give these patients the time to develop the mental
memory needed to be safe at home. Similarly the
NPs advocate for free muscle ap patients to be
discharged to a facility instead of home given the
initially fragile nature of these aps and the need
for skilled assessment of any changes they exhibit
in the postoperative period.
While the benet of MDRs can be intuited, in
2019 Patel and colleagues developed quantitative
analyses of their benet at the tertiary academic
medical center where they practiced. During their
study, 1584 patients were discharged from all
medicine teams, 825 from teams utilizing MDRs
and 759 from control teams. The proportion of
patients with discharge before noon (DBN)
orders was 41.2% on pilot versus 29.6% on control teams. Length of stay was 92.2 h versus
97.2h, and 30-day readmission rate was 16.0%
versus 18.3% for the pilot versus control teams,
respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was
12.6% compared with 18.9% for the pilot versus
control teams [3].
One outcome of MDRs is that limb NPs are
made aware of barriers to discharge such as a
patient who cannot maintain their prescribed
weight bearing status. In these cases the NPs will
frequently reach out to the patient’s surgeon to
develop alternative weight bearing restrictions. In
some cases a total contact cast (Fig.4.2) with a
walking boot may be applied on the day of discharge and the patient allowed to bear weight for
Fig. 4.2 Total Contact Cast-TCC-EZ
®

50
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
N. R. Megas et al.
transfers. In order to expedite discharges an
orthotics vendor is on site weekdays at MGUH.In
the case of a patient with a heel wound and strict
nonweight bearing orders, for example, the
orthotics team may be brought in to cast the
patient for a custom boot to ofoad the wound.
Communication Between All
Services Is Critical
With rare exception, internal medicine is consulted for the management of all limb patients’
comorbidities. As needed, other services such as
nephrology, endocrinology, and rheumatology
are also consulted. The limb service’s NPs serve
as critical liaisons with all consulting services.
The NPs review progress notes and speak with
the residents and attendings of consult services
daily to conrm agreement with the planned date
of discharge and establish what their requirements are for the patient in terms of new medication/supplies scripts and follow-up appointments.
Communication like this is the type of collaboration among providers that is repeatedly called for
throughout discussions of improved transitions
[4]. Prior to establishing collaboration between
limb NPs and consulting services, limb team residents would often issue a discharge order only to
have to cancel the order when a consulting service advised that from their point of view the
patient was not ready for discharge.
Antibiotic Therapy Requires Early
Consideration
An important aspect of discharge planning for
limb salvage patients is planning for their antibiotic therapy. MGUH’s Musculoskeletal Infectious
Disease service is consulted for all limb salvage
patients. The limb NP team confers daily with the
services’ attendings to understand which patients
may require IV antibiotics at discharge. They
then meet with the patient, advise them of the
need for a central line, and then order the appropriate line. Chronic kidney disease patients are
not candidates for PICC lines due to the possible
need for future dialysis access and will receive
alternative access such as a Hickman catheter.
These placements require pre- procedure NPO
status and sedation which must be taken into consideration in establishing a discharge timeline.
Patients already on hemodialysis who require IV
antibiotics after discharge can often have their
antibiotic administered at their dialysis facility.
The NP team interfaces with the patient’s hemodialysis facility, ordering the antibiotic and
appropriate lab tests. Keeping a close eye on discharge antibiotic plans wards off unexpected surprises such as discovering a patient ready to leave
does not have appropriate access for antibiotic
infusions.
Provider Involvement Contributes
toSuccessful Transitions
Kripalani and colleagues point out that the effectiveness of a patient transition is often enhanced
by the involvement of the attending physician
[2]. The limb NPs are in constant communication
with the team’s attending surgeons, advising
them when they need to see a particular patient to
pave the way for that patient’s discharge. Prior to
the NP team serving in this capacity, a well meaning resident would often walk into a patient’s
room and advise them they were being discharged
only to be told, “Absolutely. My doctor didn’t say
anything about leaving.” By alerting patients to
their discharge plan and then bringing attending
physicians into the discussion the NP team mediates this frequent barrier to discharge.
The limb team’s surgeons further contribute to
maximizing a patient’s potential for successful
discharge by identifying those patients at risk for
surgical site complications and ordering appropriate interventions. One of these interventions is
the use of negative pressure wound therapy
(NPWT) on closed incisions. While closed incisions are typically dressed with a sterile dressing,
limb salvage patients are at a higher risk for postoperative wound complications, such as infection, dehiscence, and hematoma and seroma
formation [5]. Shiroky and colleagues in a review
of 44 randomized controlled trials with N=5693
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
