Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_699_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
55 Мб
Скачать
78 Mesenteric physiology
Mesenteric lymphatics
l
(c) (d)
100 µm
(a) (b)
25 µm
100 µm
Surface
mesothelium
Submesothelia
connective
tissue
25 µm
Connective
tissue
septation
Lymphatic
vessels in
connective
tissue
Figure 6.7 Photomicrographs based on serial sections of mesentery. (a) Section stained with podoplanin (a lymphatic and mesothelial surface marker) demonstrating lymphatic channels beneath the surface mesothelium of the mesen­tery. (b)Corresponding serial section stained with Masson’s trichrome highlight connective tissue. Correlating A and B, the lymphatic channels identied occurred within the submesothelial connective tissue. (c) Podoplanin positive vessels (i.e., lymphatics) within the connective tissue septations that spanned the mesentery and together generated the connective tissue lattice. (d) Corresponding serial section stained with Masson’s trichrome to highlight connective tissue septations.
it is not unreasonable to suggest that cellular and molecu­lar activities associated with the greater omentum should be included in any discussion on mesenteric functionality. Atthe least, this could provide important clues of function and avenues for future research.
e omentum has appropriately been termed the “abdom­inal policeman,” as it adheres to areas of inammation and prevents the diusion of pathologic processes throughout the peritoneal cavity. In this manner, it can mechanically seal perforations, localize inammation, limit the spread of infection, and simultaneously prompt local revasculariza­tion and tissue regeneration [142–144].
e greater omentum contains adipocy tes, macrophages,
B cells, T cells, mast cells, and dendritic cells [145]. Lynch etal. noted that while iNKT and CD1d+ cells amass in the greater omentum, this phenomenon is reduced in obesity and in patients with colorectal cancer [144]. us, it would appear that the policeman activity of the greater omentum extends beyond the simple mechanical and may also include immune protection against the development of malignancy [146]. Lysaght et al. aimed to characterize T lymphocytes in visceral adiposity (using omentum) and peripheral blood from 35 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. T cell activation markers CD69 and CD107a were increased in
References 79
expression in omental CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, compared with corresponding levels in peripheral blood. CD45RO T cells were more prevalent in omentum compared with peripheral venous blood. While the relevance of these nd­ings is under investigation, they indicate that the greater omentum, like the mesentery, is likely to be far more active than previously appreciated [146]. ese observations have yet to be investigated in the context of the mesenteric com­ponent of visceral adiposity.
FUTURE STUDIES
From the earlier discussion, it can be seen that the mesen­tery does not act simply in a bystander manner providing a scaold for the passage of blood vessels to and from the intestine. It occupies a unique anatomic position between the intestine and the body proper. e histologic, connec­tive tissue, lymphatic, and immunologic continuity between all three mean it is optimally placed to exert a key inu­ence over local and systemic homeostatic processes. It is ideally placed to sample microbial environmental cues and orchestrate appropriate systemic as well as local mucosal responses. It is important to further investigate this regula­tory hub, or signal box, and to characterize its role in nor­mality and disease.
e mesentery is a highly active immunological, endo­crine, and metabolic organ. Mesenteric mesothelium has regenerative and pluripotential properties that are impor­tant in response to injury within the abdomen, but that may be deranged in hernia or adhesion development. Future studies should aim to investigate the regenerative capacity of mesenteric mesothelium and the role that this may have in abdominal pathology.
SUMMARY
Mesenteric physiology is an emerging eld. e recent clarication of mesenteric anatomy from duodenojejunal exure to mesorectal level provides an ideal platform to better characterize the physiologic relevance of this organ in general. Scientic and clinical communities are now provided with exciting opportunities that will enhance our understanding of its function in normality and hence its role in disease processes.
REFERENCES
1. Gray, H., Anatomy, Descriptive and Surgical. Henry
C. Lea, Philadelphia, PA, 1867, pp. 662–663.
2. Moore, K.L., A.F. Dalley, and A.M.R. Agur, Clinically
Oriented Anatomy. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, PA, 2013, pp. 219–221, 241–251.
3. Coffey, J.C., Surgical anatomy and anatomic
surgery—Clinical and scientic mutualism. Surgeon,
2013. 11(4): 177–182.
4. McConnell, A.A. and T.H. Garratt, Abnormalities
+
of xation of the ascending colon: The relation of symptoms to anatomical ndings. Br J Surg, 1923. 10: 532–557.
5. Coffey, J.C. and P. Dockery, Colorectal cancer: Surgery for colorectal cancer—Standardization required. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016. 13(5): 256–257.
6. Standring, S., Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Churchill Livingstone/ Elsevier, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2008, pp. 1099–1111, 1125 –1163.
7. Schoenwolf, G.C. etal., Larsen’s Human Embryology. Elsevier Health Sciences, London, U.K., 2014, pp.343–345, 346f, 347f, 356, 356f, 357.
8. Coffey, J.C. etal., Mesenteric-based surgery exploits gastrointestinal, peritoneal, mesenteric and fascial continuity from duodenojejunal exure to the anorectal junction—A review. Dig Surg, 2015. 32(4): 291–300.
9. Culligan, K. etal., The mesocolon: A histological and electron microscopic characterization of the mesenteric attachment of the colon prior to and after surgical mobilization. Ann Surg, 2014. 260(6): 1048–1056.
10. Culligan, K. etal., The mesocolon: A prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis, 2012. 14(4): 421–428; discussion 428–430.
11. Quante, M. etal., Obesity-related immune responses and their impact on surgical outcomes. IntJ Obes, 2015. 39(6): 877– 883.
12. Feakins, R.M., Obesity and metabolic syndrome: Pathological effects on the gastrointestinal tract. Histopathology, 2016. 68(5): 630–640.
13. Farb, M.G. and N. Gokce, Visceral adiposopathy: Avascular perspective. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig,
2015. 21(2): 125–136.
14. Takahara, M. and I. Shimomura, Metabolic syndrome and lifestyle modication. Rev Endocr Metab Disord,
2014. 15(4): 317–327.
15. Ryo, M. etal., Clinical signicance of visceral adipos­ity assessed by computed tomography: A Japanese perspective. World J Radiol, 2014. 6(7): 409–416.
16. Lopez-Jaramillo, P. etal., The role of leptin/adipo­nectin ratio in metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig, 2014. 18(1): 37–45.
17. Kolovou, G.D. etal., Body mass index, lipid metab­olism and estrogens: Their impact on coronary heart disease. Curr Med Chem, 2014. 21(30): 3455–3465.
18. Kaur, J., A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract, 2014. 2014: 943162.
19. Castro, A.V. etal., Obesity, insulin resistance and comorbidities? Mechanisms of association. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol, 2014. 58(6): 600–609.
80 Mesenteric physiology
20. Amato, M.C. and C. Giordano, Visceral adiposity index: An indicator of adipose tissue dysfunction. IntJ Endocrinol, 2014. 2014: 730 827.
21. Zhao, J. and M.W. Lawless, Stop feeding cancer: Pro­inammatory role of visceral adiposity in liver cancer. Cytokine, 2013. 64(3): 626 – 637.
22. Connelly, T.M. etal., Volumetric fat ratio and not body mass index is predictive of ileocolectomy outcomes in Crohn’s disease patients. Dig Surg,
2014. 31(3): 219–224.
23. Keum, N. etal., Visceral adiposity and colorectal adenomas: Dose-response meta-analysis of observa­tional studies. Ann Oncol, 2015. 26(6): 1101–1109.
24. Kimura, Y. etal., Relationship between visceral fat and development of colorectal neoplasms using computed tomographic colonography and adipocy­tokine levels. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi, 2014. 111(11): 2121–2130.
25. Lee, J.Y. etal., Visceral fat accumulation is associated with colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. PLOS ONE, 2014. 9(11): e110587.
26. Wronska, A. and Z. Kmiec, Structural and biochemi­cal characteristics of various white adipose tissue depots. Acta Physiol, 2012. 205(2): 194–208.
27. Fried, S.K. etal., Lipoprotein lipase regulation by insulin and glucocorticoid in subcutaneous and omental adipose tissues of obese women and men. JClin Invest, 1993. 92(5): 2191–2198.
28. Bonen, A. etal., The fatty acid transporter FAT/CD36 is upregulated in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues in human obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes, 2006. 30(6): 877–883.
29. Drolet, R. etal., Fat depot-specic impact of visceral obesity on adipocyte adiponectin release in women. Obesity, 2009. 17(3): 424–430.
30. Erman, A. etal., Human growth hormone receptor (GHR) expression in obesity: I. GHR mRNA expression in omental and subcutaneous adipose tissues of obese women. Int J Obes, 2011. 35(12): 1511–1519.
31. Hoffstedt, J. etal., Variation in adrenergic regula­tion of lipolysis between omental and subcutaneous adipocytes from obese and non-obese men. J Lipid Res, 1997. 38(4): 795–804.
32. Hou, X.G. etal., Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue diacylglycerol acyltransferase activity in humans. Obesity, 2009. 17(6): 1129–113 4 .
33. Kraunsoe, R. etal., Mitochondrial respiration in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from patients with morbid obesity. J Physiol, 2010. 588(Pt12): 2023–2032.
34. Ortega, F.J. etal., Subcutaneous fat shows higher thyroid hormone receptor-alpha1 gene expression than omental fat. Obesity, 2009. 17(12): 2134–2141.
35. Ray, H. etal., Depot-specic differences in perilipin and hormone-sensitive lipase expression in lean and obese. Lipids Health Dis, 2009. 8: 58.
36. Virtanen, K.A. etal., Glucose uptake and perfusion in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue during insulin stimulation in nonobese and obese humans. JClin Endocrinol Metab, 2002. 87(8): 3902–3910.
37. Coffey, J.C. et al., The mesentery in Crohn’s disease: Friend or foe? Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2016. 32(4): 267–273.
38. Tracy, R.P., Is visceral adiposity the “enemy within”? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2001. 21(6): 881–883.
39. Danesh, J. etal., Association of brinogen, C-reactive protein, albumin, or leukocyte count with coronary heart disease: Meta-analyses of prospective studies. J Am Med Assoc, 1998. 279(18): 1477–1482.
40. Festa, A. etal., Chronic subclinical inammation as part of the insulin resistance syndrome: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Circulation,
2000. 102(1): 42– 47.
41. Loskutoff, D.J. and F. Samad, The adipocyte and hemostatic balance in obesity: Studies of PAI-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 1998. 18(1): 1–6.
42. Schmidt, M.I. etal., Markers of inamma­tion and prediction of diabetes mellitus in adults(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study):Acohortstudy. Lancet, 1999. 353(9165): 1649–1652.
43. Yudkin, J.S., Abnormalities of coagulation and brinolysis in insulin resistance. Evidence for a common antecedent? Diabet Care, 1999. 22(Suppl.3): C25–C30.
44. Yudkin, J.S. etal., C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: Associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: A poten­tial role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 1999. 19(4): 972–978.
45. Amato, M.C. etal., Visceral adiposity index and DHEAS are useful markers of diabetes risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol,
2015. 172(1): 79–88.
46. Moh, M.C. etal., Evaluation of body adiposity index as a predictor of aortic stiffness in multi-ethnic Asian population with type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res,
2015. 12(2): 111–118 .
47. Nazare, J.A. etal., Usefulness of measuring both body mass index and waist circumference for the estimation of visceral adiposity and related cardiometabolic risk prole (from the INSPIRE ME IAA Study). Am J Cardiol, 2015. 115(3): 307–315.
48. Needham, B.L. etal., Endogenous sex steroid hormones and glucose in a South-Asian popula­tion without diabetes: The Metabolic Syndrome and Atherosclerosis in South-Asians Living in America pilot study. Diabet Med, 2015. 32(9): 1193–1200.
49. Shah, R.V. etal., Visceral adiposity and the risk of metabolic syndrome across body mass index: The MESA study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014. 7(12):1221–1235.
References 81
50. Yamaoka, M. etal., Adipose hypothermia in obesity and its association with period homolog 1, insulin sensitivity, and inammation in fat. PLOS ONE, 2014. 9(11): e112813.
51. Yu, H. etal., Visceral fat area as a new predictor of short-term diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in Chinese patients with a body mass index less than 35kg/m. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2015. 11(1): 6 –11.
52. Guenther, M. etal., Adiposity distribution inuences circulating adiponectin levels. Transl Res, 2014. 164(4): 270–277.
53. Hartwig, S. etal., Identication of novel adipokines differential regulated in C57BL/Ks and C57BL/6. Arch Physiol Biochem, 2014. 120(5): 208–215.
54. Zubiria, M.G. etal., Relationship between impaired adipogenesis of retroperitoneal adipose tissue and hypertrophic obesity: Role of endogenous glucocorticoid excess. J Cell Mol Med, 2014. 18(8): 1549–1561.
55. Shah, S. etal., Cellular basis of tissue regeneration by omentum. PLOS ONE, 2012. 7(6): e38368.
56. Hoggard, N. etal., Using gene expression to predict differences in the secretome of human omental vs. subcutaneous adipose tissue. Obesity, 2012. 20(6): 1158 –1167.
57. Sadler, D., C.A. Mattacks, and C.M. Pond, Changes in adipocytes and dendritic cells in lymph node containing adipose depots during and after many weeks of mild inammation. J Anat, 2005. 207(6): 769–781.
58. Barbier, M. etal., Overexpression of leptin mRNA in mesenteric adipose tissue in inammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 2003. 27(11): 987–991.
59. Batra, A. etal., Mesenteric fat—Control site for bacterial translocation in colitis? Mucosal Immunol,
2012. 5(5): 580–591.
60. Desreumaux, P. etal., Inammatory alterations in mesenteric adipose tissue in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology, 1999. 117(1): 73–81.
61. Drouet, M. etal., Visceral fat and gut inammation. Nutrition, 2012. 28(2 ): 113 –117.
62. Heidemann, J. etal., Antiangiogenic treatment of mesenteric desmoid tumors with toremifene and interferon alfa-2b: Report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004. 47(1): 118–122.
63. Karagiannides, I. and C. Pothoulakis, Neuropeptides, mesenteric fat, and intestinal inammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008. 1144: 127–135.
64. Kaser, A. and H. Tilg, “Metabolic aspects” in inammatory bowel diseases. Curr Drug Deliv, 2012. 9(4): 326–332.
65. Kawashima, D. etal., Augmented expression of secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine and EBI1 ligand chemokine in Crohn’s disease. J Clin Pathol,
2005. 58(10): 1057–1063.
66. Kredel, L.I. etal., Adipokines from local fat cells shape the macrophage compartment of the creeping fat in Crohn’s disease. Gut, 2013. 62(6): 852–862.
67. Magnusson, F.C. etal., Direct presentation of antigen by lymph node stromal cells protects against CD8 T-cell-mediated intestinal autoimmunity. Gastroenterology, 2008. 134(4): 1028 –1037.
68. Mahida, Y.R. etal., High circulating concentrations of interleukin-6 in active Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis. Gut, 1991. 32(12): 1531–1534.
69. Peyrin-Biroulet, L. etal., Mesenteric fat as a source of C reactive protein and as a target for bacterial translocation in Crohn’s disease. Gut, 2012. 61(1): 78–85.
70. Sakuraba, A. etal., Th1/Th17 immune response is induced by mesenteric lymph node dendritic cells in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology, 2009. 137(5): 1736 –1745.
71. Schafer, A. etal., Secretion of RANTES (CCL5) and interleukin-10 from mesenteric adipose tissue and from creeping fat in Crohn’s disease: Regulation by steroid treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006. 21(9): 1412–1418.
72. Schafer, A., J. Scholmerich, and C. Buchler, Mechanisms of disease: Adipocytokines and visceral adipose tissue—Emerging role in intestinal and mesenteric diseases. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2005. 2(2): 103 –111.
73. Yamamoto, K. etal., Production of adiponectin, an anti-inammatory protein, in mesenteric adi­pose tissue in Crohn’s disease. Gut, 2005. 54(6): 789–796.
74. Zuo, L. etal., Mesenteric adipocyte dysfunction in Crohn’s disease is associated with hypoxia. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2016. 22(1): 114–126.
75. Goncalves, P., F. Magro, and F. Martel, Metabolic inammation in inammatory bowel disease: Crosstalk between adipose tissue and bowel. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2015. 21(2): 453–467.
76. Magro, F., P. Sousa, and P. Ministro, C-reactive protein in Crohn’s disease: How informative is it? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014. 8(4): 393–408.
77. Kredel, L.I. and B. Siegmund, Adipose-tissue and intestinal inammation—Visceral obesity and creeping fat. Front Immunol, 2014. 5: 462.
78. Kredel, L., A. Batra, and B. Siegmund, Role of fat and adipokines in intestinal inammation. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2014. 30(6): 559–565.
79. Siegmund, B., Mesenteric fat in Crohn’s disease: The hot spot of inammation? Gut, 2012. 61(1): 3–5.
80. Rodrigues, V.S. etal., Serum levels and mesenteric fat tissue expression of adiponectin and leptin in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Exp Immunol,
2012. 170(3): 358–364.
81. Black, S., I. Kushner, and D. Samols, C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem, 2004. 279(47): 48487–48490.
82 Mesenteric physiology
82. Amato, M.C. etal., Visceral adiposity index (Visceral adiposityI) is predictive of an altered adipokine prole in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLOS ONE,
2014. 9(3): e91969.
83. Despres, J.P., Body fat distribution and risk of cardiovascular disease: An update. Circulation, 2012. 126(10): 1301–1313.
84. Fernandes, R.A. etal., The use of bioelectrical impedance to detect excess visceral and subcutane­ous fat. J Pediatr, 2007. 83(6): 529–534.
85. Tchernof, A. and J.P. Despres, Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: An update. Physiol Rev,
2013. 93(1): 359–404.
86. Ding, Y. etal., Association of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, adiponectin, and low­grade inammation with the course of the metabolic syndrome. Clin Biochem, 2015. 48(7–8): 503–507.
87. Holecki, M. etal., Inammation but not obesity or insulin resistance is associated with increased plasma broblast growth factor 23 concentration in the elderly. Clin Endocrinol, 2015. 82(6): 900–909.
88. Kaur, R. etal., C-reactive protein + 1059 G>C polymorphism in type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease patients. Meta Gene, 2013. 1: 82–92.
89. Rethorst, C.D., I. Bernstein, and M.H. Trivedi, Inammation, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in depression: Analysis of the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). J Clin Psychiatry, 2014. 75(12): e1428 – e1432.
90. Zuliani, G. etal., Insulin resistance and systemic inammation, but not metabolic syndrome phe­notype, predict 9years mortality in older adults. Atherosclerosis, 2014. 235(2): 538–545.
91. Nishiyama, C. etal., Trans-mesenteric neural crest cells are the principal source of the colonic enteric nervous system. Nat Neurosci, 2012. 15(9): 1211–1218.
92. Chan, J.A. and M.H. Kulke, Neuroendocrine tumors­current and future clinical advances. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 2016. 30(1): xiii–xiv.
93. Boland, B.S. etal., Validation of gene expression biomarker analysis for biopsy-based clinical trials in Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2015. 21(2): 323–330.
94. Cekic, C. etal., Evaluation of the relationship between serum ghrelin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels, and disease activity in inam­matory bowel diseases. Hepatogastroenterology,
2014. 61(133): 1196 –120 0.
95. Lopez-Hernandez, R. etal., Pro- and anti­inammatory cytokine gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms in inammatory bowel disease. Int JImmunogenet, 2015. 42(1): 38– 45.
96. Tsukahara, T. etal., Tumor necrosis factor alpha decreases glucagon-like peptide-2 expression by up-regulating g-protein-coupled receptor 120 in Crohn disease. Am J Pathol, 2015. 185(1): 185 –196.
97. Zhang, H. etal., Bioactive dietary peptides and amino acids in inammatory bowel disease. Amino Acids, 2015. 47(10): 2127–2141.
98. Wei, B. etal., Mesenteric B cells centrally inhibit CD4+ T cell colitis through interaction with regulatory T cell subsets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
2005. 102(6): 2010–2015.
99. Hammerschmidt, S.I. etal., Stromal mesenteric lymph node cells are essential for the generation of gut-homing T cells invivo. J Exp Med, 2008. 205(11): 2483–2490.
100. Diehl, G.E. etal., Microbiota restricts trafcking of bacteria to mesenteric lymph nodes by CX(3)CR1(hi) cells. Nature, 2013. 494(7435): 116–120.
101. Karlis, J. etal., Characterization of colonic and mesen­teric lymph node dendritic cell subpopulations in a murine adoptive transfer model of inammatory bowel disease. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2004. 10(6): 834–847.
102. Bialecki, M. etal., Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the determination of Crohn’s disease activity— Preliminary experience. Pol J Radiol, 2014. 79: 70–74.
103. Girlich, C. etal., Quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularisation in Crohn’s disease with contrast­enhanced ultrasound and perfusion analysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2009. 43(1–2): 141–148.
104. Girlich, C. etal., Comparison between a clinical activity index (Harvey-Bradshaw-Index), laboratory inammation markers and quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol, 2012. 81(6): 1105 –1109.
105. Schreyer, A.G. etal., Microcirculation and perfusion with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn’s disease: First results with linear contrast harmonic imaging (CHI). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2008. 40(2): 143–155.
106. Ripolles, T. etal., Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn’s disease: Technique, image interpretation and clinical applications. Insights Imaging, 2011. 2(6): 639–652.
107. Sideri, A. etal., Substance P mediates proinamma­tory cytokine release from mesenteric adipocytes in inammatory bowel disease patients. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015. 1(4): 420–432.
108. Leal, R.F. etal., Toll-like receptor 4, F4/80 and pro-inammatory cytokines in intestinal and mesenteric fat tissue of Crohn’s disease. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2013. 6(2): 98–104.
109. Jung, S.H. etal., The role of adipose tissue-associated macrophages and T lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of inammatory bowel disease. Cytokine, 2013. 61(2): 459–468.
110. Sibartie, S. etal., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) as a modifying factor in Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2010. 16(2): 296–304.
References 83
111. Karagiannides, I. etal., Induction of colitis causes inammatory responses in fat depots: Evidence for substance P pathways in human mesenteric preadipocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006. 103(13): 5207–5212.
112. Paul, G. etal., Proling adipocytokine secretion from creeping fat in Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis,
2006. 12(6): 471–477.
113. Schafer, A. etal., Vascular endothelial growth factor secretion from mesenteric adipose tissue and from creeping fat in Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2006. 21(9): 1419–1423.
114. Karki, S. etal., Wilms’ tumor 1 (Wt1) regulates pleural mesothelial cell plasticity and transition into myobroblasts in idiopathic pulmonary brosis. FASEB J, 2014. 28(3): 1122–1131.
115. Li, Y., J. Wang, and K. Asahina, Mesothelial cells give rise to hepatic stellate cells and myobro­blasts via mesothelial-mesenchymal transition in liver injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013. 110(6): 2324–2329.
116. Loureiro, J. etal., Tamoxifen ameliorates peritoneal membrane damage by blocking mesothelial to mesenchymal transition in peritoneal dialysis. PLOS ONE, 2013. 8(4): e 61165.
117. Nasreen, N. etal., Pleural mesothelial cell transformation into myobroblasts and haptotactic migration in response to TGF-beta1 invitro. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2009. 297(1): L115 – L124.
118. Sandoval, P. etal., Carcinoma-associated broblasts derive from mesothelial cells via mesothelial-to­mesenchymal transition in peritoneal metastasis. JPathol, 2013. 231(4): 517–531.
119. Strippoli, R. etal., Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transi­tion of peritoneal mesothelial cells is regulated by an ERK/NF-kappaB/Snail1 pathway. Dis Model Mech,
2008. 1(4–5): 264–274.
120. Balogh, P. etal., Estrogen receptor alpha is expressed in mesenteric mesothelial cells and is internalized in caveolae upon Freund’s adjuvant treatment. PLOS ONE, 2013. 8(11): e79508.
121. Li, C. and J.F. Kuemmerle, Mechanisms that medi­ate the development of brosis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inamm Bowel Dis, 2014. 20(7): 1250–1258.
122. Sazuka, S. etal., Fibrocytes are involved in inamma­tion as well as brosis in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci, 2014. 59(4): 760 –768.
123. Burke, J.P. etal., Bacterial lipopolysaccharide promotes probrotic activation of intestinal broblasts. Br J Surg, 2010. 97(7): 1126–1134.
124. Burke, J.P. etal., Endoglin negatively regu­lates transforming growth factor beta1-induced probrotic responses in intestinal broblasts. BrJSurg, 2010. 97(6): 892–901.
125. Burke, J.P. etal., Simvastatin impairs smad-3 phosphorylation and modulates transforming growth factor beta1-mediated activation of intestinal broblasts. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(5): 541–551.
126. Sahebally, S.M. etal., Circulating brocytes and Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg, 2013. 100(12): 1549–1556.
127. diZerega, G., Peritoneal Surgery. Springer, New York, 1999, pp. 162–163, 422–442, 484.
128. Garriga, V. etal., US of the tunica vaginalis testis: Anatomic relationships and pathologic conditions. Radiographics, 2009. 29(7): 2017–2032.
129. Raftery, A.T., Regeneration of parietal and visceral peri­toneum in the immature animal: A light and electron microscopical study. Br J Surg, 1973. 60(12): 969–975.
130. Hubbard, T.B., Jr. etal., The pathology of peritoneal repair: Its relation to the formation of adhesions. Ann Surg, 1967. 165(6): 908 –916.
131. Glucksman, D.L., Serosal integrity and intestinal adhesions. Surgery, 1966. 60(5): 1009–1011.
132. Eskeland, G., Regeneration of parietal peritoneum in rats. 1. A light microscopical study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand, 1966. 68(3): 355–378.
133. Ellis, H., W. Harrison, and T.B. Hugh, The healing of peritoneum under normal and pathological condi­tions. Br J Surg, 1965. 52: 471–476.
134. Milligan, D.W. and A.T. Raftery, Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: A light and electron microscopical study. Br J Surg, 1974. 61(4): 274–280.
135. Brosens, I.A., P.R. Koninckx, and P.A. Corveleyn, A study of plasma progesterone, oestradiol-17beta, pro­lactin and LH levels, and of the luteal phase appear­ance of the ovaries in patients with endometriosis and infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1978. 85(4): 246–250.
136. Dhont, M. etal., Ovulation stigma and concentration of progesterone and estradiol in peritoneal uid: Relation with fertility and endometriosis. Fertil Steril,
1984. 41(6): 872–877.
137. Berkovich, L. etal., Evaluation of peritoneal CEA levels following colorectal cancer surgery. JSurgOncol, 2014. 110(4): 458 –462.
138. Blackburn, S.C. and M.P. Stanton, Anatomy and physiology of the peritoneum. Semin Pediatr Surg,
2014. 23(6): 326–330.
139. Passot, G. etal., Intra-operative peritoneal lavage for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol, 2014. 20(8): 1935–1939.
140. Culligan, K. etal., A detailed appraisal of meso­colic lymphangiology—An immunohistochemical and stereological analysis. J Anat, 2014. 225(4): 463–472.
141. Boni, L. etal., Injection of colorectal cancer cells in mesenteric and antimesenteric sides of the colon results in different patterns of metastatic diffusion: An experimental study in rats. World J Surg Oncol,
2005. 3: 69.
84 Mesenteric physiology
142. Platell, C. etal., The omentum. World J
Gastroenterol, 2000. 6(2): 169–176.
143. Litbarg, N.O. etal., Activated omentum becomes rich in factors that promote healing and tissue regenera­tion. Cell Tissue Res, 2007. 328(3): 487–497.
144. Lynch, L. etal., Invariant NKT cells and CD1d(+) cells amass in human omentum and are depleted in patients with cancer and obesity. Eur J Immunol,
2009. 39(7): 1893–1901.
145. Bianchini, F., R. Kaaks, and H. Vainio, Overweight,
obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol, 2002. 3(9): 565 –574.
146. Lysaght, J. etal., T lymphocyte activation in visceral adipose tissue of patients with oesophageal adeno­carcinoma. Br J Surg, 2011. 98(7): 964–974.
7

Pathology of the mesentery

J. CALVIN COFFEY, JONATHON RODDY, MIRANDA KIERNAN, AND SHAHEEL M. SAHEBALLY
Aim 85 Introduction 85 Primary mesenteropathies 86 Crohn’s disease (primary mesenteropathy) 86
Mesenteric manifestations in Crohn’sdisease 86 Mesenteric manifestations correlate with local and
systemic disease manifestations inCrohn’s disease 87
Mesenteric and mucosal abnormalities directly
correlate in Crohn’s disease 87
Mesenteric and intestinal mesenchymal abnormalities
overlap 87 Mesenteric and mucosal transcriptional proles 87 Fibrocytes are a biomarker in Crohn’s disease 87 Circulating brocytes and disease activity in Crohn’s
disease 90 Circulating brocyte levels change following intestinal
resection in Crohn’sdisease 90 Miscellaneous support for mesenteric involvement 90 Appendicitis and Crohn’s disease 90 CRP production in Crohn’s disease 90 Mesenteric production of substance P inCrohn’s
disease 90 Summary 90
Non- (i.e., mal) rotation 92
Anatomy 92 Clinical implications of non (i.e., mal) rotation 93 Molecular basis of non (i.e., mal) rotation 93
Volvulus 93 Epiploic appendagitis 95 Mesenteric ischemia 95 Internal herniation 95 Desmoid tumor 95 Mesenteric cysts 97 Sclerosing mesenteritis 97 IgG4-related sclerosing mesenteritis 97 Mesenteric neurologic pathology 97 Secondary mesenteropathies 97 Appendicitis 98 Phlegmon 98 Mesenteric adenitis 98 Lymphoma 99 Peritoneal carcinomatosis 99 Neuroendocrine tumors 100 Castleman’s disease 101 Mesenteric lymph node cavitation syndrome 101 Indeterminate mesenteropathies 101 Adhesion formation 101 Congenital adhesion formation 101 Diabetes and metabolic syndrome 103 Irritable bowel syndrome 103 Future directions 103 Summary 104 References 104
The problem, when solved, will be simple.
On wall of General Motors
Research Laboratory
AIM
e rst aim is to dene the concept of a mesenteropathy and describe a classication system for these. A second aim is to describe the mesenteric and peritoneal manifestations of mesenteropathy subtypes.
INTRODUCTION
e functional and anatomical distinctiveness of the mes­entery has generated increasing interest in mesenteric diseases. In keeping with this, a range of pathologies can be identied that are readily and directly associated with the mesentery. Several more are increasingly associated through recent experimental ndings. As with diseases of other organs, the mesentery appears to be vulnerable to a range of pathologies including inammatory, vascular, con­nective tissue, and neoplastic.
85
86 Pathology of the mesentery
Table 7.1 Mesenteropathies
Primary Secondary Indeterminate
Crohn’s disease Mesenteric adenitis Adhesions Ischemia Appendicitis Diabetes mellitus Mal or nonrotation Phlegmon Atherosclerosis Volvulus Metastatic disease Metabolic syndrome Internal herniation Desmoid tumors Irritable bowel syndrome Cysts Peritoneal carcinomatosis Schwannoma Castleman’s disease Sclerosing mesenteritis Primary—IG4 Lymphoma
Epiploic appendagitis
Mesenteropathies
Subtypes
Secondary—dialysis Mesenteric cavitation syndrome
A mesenteropathy is an abnormality of the mesentery. A primary mesenteropathy is one that arises primarily within the mesentery and can spread to involve adjacent structures (i.e., the intestine) (Table 7.1). A secondary mesenteropathy is one where the primary abnormality originates outside the mesentery but which secondarily involves the mesentery. Indeterminate mesenteropathies are conditions that receive contributions from the mesen­tery (as well as other sources) that are of pathobiological relevance.
It should be said that this is an emerging eld. Disease entities are positioned in the earlier classication system according to the weight of supportive data available. is is not meant to be denitive or exhaustive and aims to provide a platform from which abnormalities of the mesentery can be investigated in a systematic manner.
PRIMARY MESENTEROPATHIES
ese are abnormalities that arise primarily within the mesentery but can progress to involve local or systemic organs.
CROHN’S DISEASE (PRIMARY MESENTEROPATHY)
Recent ndings challenge the classic notion that Crohn’s disease arises from the mucosa of the intestine. It is feasible that Crohn’s disease represents a true primary mesenteropa- thy, that is, a disease arising in the mesentery. As this rep­resents a considerable shiin current thinking, the data to support it will be discussed in detail.
Both the etiology and pathobiology of Crohn’s dis­ease remain under investigation. Surgical excision rates are unchanged despite the emergence of new treatment regimens [1]. As a result, investigators are turning to alternative hypotheses to explain this disease. The most widely held theory is that Crohn’s is an inflammatory and fibrotic disorder originating in the gastrointestinal tract and progressing transmurally to the mesentery [2]. Although transmural mesenchymal abnormalities are hallmarks of Crohn’s disease, their cellular and molec­ular basis remain unknown [3]. The following section explores data supporting the theory that Crohn’s dis­ease is a primary mesenteropathy (i.e., the “outside-in hypothesis”).
Mesenteric manifestations inCrohn’sdisease
Mesenteric abnormalities in Crohn’s disease include fat wrapping and mesenteric thickening. Fat wrapping is unique to Crohn’s disease and represents the advancement of mesenteric fat over the intestinal surface. Mesenteric thickening is also a prominent feature and creates signi­cant technical diculties for surgeons [4–8].
A direct correlation occurs between fat wrapping and increased risk of future surgery for recurrent disease (Figure 7.1) [5,6,8,9]. In patients in whom fat wrapping extends over 50% of the intestinal circumference, the time to surgical recurrence is reduced. In a multivariate analysis examining the predictive role of smoking and other factors, fat wrapping remains the single strongest predictor of surgical recurrence. ese points reinforce the concept that increasing levels of mesenteric disease
Crohn’s disease (primary mesenteropathy) 87
Mesenteric fat wrapping
Mucosal ulceration
Mesenteric fat wrapping
Figure 7.1 Mesenteric and mucosal Crohn's disease as observed following an ileocolic resection in a patient with stricturing Crohn's disease.
predict the rate and severity of recurrence in Crohn’s dis­ease (Figure 7.1). ey support the suggestion that mesen- teric-based events are of importance in the pathobiology of Crohn’s disease.
Mesenteric manifestations correlate with local and systemic disease manifestations inCrohn’s disease
In inammatory bowel disease, disease manifestations outside the intestinal tract (i.e., extraintestinal disease manifestations) can eect eyes, joints, skin, and other systems [10]. Although mesenteric disease manifestations are characteristic of Crohn’s disease, they are remark­ably understudied. Fat wrapping and mesenteric thicken­ing may be conceptually combined to generate a scoring mechanism that allows the quantitation of mesenteric disease, and its correlation with other disease activity scoring systems (Figure 7.2). Emerging data indicate that the mesenteric disease scores correlate with the Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI), as well as with increasing levels of mucosal disease. Data suggests that smoking leads to a signicant deterioration in mesenteric disease scores. is is highly relevant as smoking is known to worsen Crohn’s disease and increases the risk of disease recurrence requiring surgery [8,11–13]. is combination of ndings suggests that the mesentery is sensitive to the negative eects of smoking in Crohn's disease. It suggests that mesenteric events are of primary pathobiologic sig­nicance in this condition (Figure 7.2).
Mesenteric and mucosal abnormalities directly correlate in Crohn’s disease
Examination of postoperative specimens in Crohn's disease demonstrates a zone at which the mesentery changes from normal to abnormal. is is a short zone at which mucosal disease appears to commence. A sharp demarcation separates normal and abnormal mucosa. Mucosal ulceration in Crohn’s disease invariably commences adjacent the mesentery and not at the opposing antimesenteric side of the mucosa. is is referred to as axial polarity (Figure7.3) [7,8,14,15]. Although the molecular basis for this observation is unknown, increas­ing evidence points to involvement of mesentery-derived cytokines such as TNF-α. Mesenteric adipocytes are major sources of TNF-α [16,17]. TNF-α upregulates expression of brogenic and mitogenic genes, prolongs inammation, and increases expression of other inammatory cytokines.
Mesenteric and intestinal mesenchymal abnormalities overlap
Recent investigation of the histology of the mesentery dem­onstrates a connective tissue continuity between it and adja­cent intestinal tract [19]. When the mesentery and associated intestine are examined in Crohn’s disease, similar mesenchy­mal abnormalities occur in both. ese include adipocyte hyperplasia, increases in connective tissue, and brocytosis. An overlap occurs at the interface between the mesentery and intestine (i.e., the intestinal hilum) and mayexplain the trans- mural features of mesenchymal abnormalities in Crohn’s.
Mesenteric and mucosal transcriptional proles
It is now feasible, using in silico techniques, to compare mucosal and mesenteric gene expression in Crohn’s disease [20]. In addition, abnormalities in gene expression can be linked to disease processes through network linkage instru­ments such as Ingenuity® [21]. When this is completed for mucosal gene expression in Crohn’s disease, emerging nd­ings indicate that the diseases associated are linked with vascular and metabolic disorders. In contrast, diseases asso­ciated with abnormal mesenteric gene expression appear to be more associated with mesenchymal and inammatory disorders. us, it seems that the transcriptional environ­ment within the mesentery, but not in the mucosa, supports the mesenchymal hallmarks of Crohn’s disease.
Fibrocytes are a biomarker in Crohn’s disease
Given the above, quantitation of mesenteric manifestations would be useful in terms of tailoring treatment in patients with Crohn’s disease. While mesenteric manifestations can