Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4433_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
58 Мб
Скачать
14 BAlAnCE FunCtion AssEssmEnt And mAnAgEmEnt
https://t.me/medicina_free
Darwin, E. (1794). Zoonomia; or, the laws of organic life (Vol. I).
London, UK.
Darwin, E. (1796). Zoonomia; or, the laws of organic life (Vol. II).
London, UK.
Flourens, P. (1824). Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés
et les functions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés. Paris, France: Crevot.
Flourens, P. (1842). Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés
et les functions du syst
(2nd ed.). Paris, France: Crevot.
Griffith, C. R. (1922). An historical survey of vestibular equilibra-
tion. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Harsch, V. (2006). Centrifuge “therapy” for psychiatric
patients in Germany in the early 1800s. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77, 157–160.
Lorente de Nó, R. (1933). Vestibulo-ocular reflex arc. Archives
of Neurology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 245–291.
Mach, E. (1875). Grundlinien der lehre von den bewegungsemp-
findungen. Leipzig, Germany.
Nobel Lectures Including Presentation of Speeches and Lau-
reates’ Biographies. Physiology or Medicine. 1901–1921. (1967). Bárány lecture, (1916). Published for the Nobel Foundation in 1967 (pp. 500–511). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Nylen, C. O. (1965). Robert Barany. Archive of Otolaryngology,
82, 316–319.
Purkyneˇ, J. E. (1820). Beiträge zur näheren kenntniß des
schwindels aus heautognostischen daten. Medizin Jahrbuch
Kaiser-könig
Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1927). The works of Aristotle, Volume 7.
Oxford: Clarendon. In N. J. Wade, (2003). Destined for dis-
öester Staates, 6, 79–125.
ème nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés
tinguished oblivion: The scientific vision of William Charles Wells (1757–1817). New York, NY: Springer.
Traynor, R. (2015). International giants in otology: Guichard
Joseph Duverney. Retrieved from https://hearinghealth-
matters.org/hearinginternational/2015/international­giants-in-otology-guichard-joseph-duverney/
Wade, N. (2000). William Charles Wells (1757–1817) and ves-
tibular research before Purkinje and Flourens. Journal of Vestibular Research, 10(3), 127–137.
Wade, N. J. (2003). Destined for distinguished oblivion: The scien-
tific vision of William Charles Wells (1757–1817). New York, NY: Springer.
Wade, N. (2010). The Darwins and Wells: From revolution to
evolution. Journal of the History of Neuroscience, 19, 85–104.
Wade, N., & Tatler, B. (2005). The moving tablet of the eye: The
origins of modern eye movement research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wells, W. C. (1792). An essay upon single vision with two eyes:
Together with experiments and observations on several other subjects in optics. William Charles Wells, M.D. London, UK:
Printed for T. Cadell, in the Strand.
Wells, W. C. (1794). Reply to Darwin on vision. Gentleman’s
Magazine, 64, 794–797.
Wells, W. C. (1794). Reply to Darwin on vision. Gentleman’s
Magazine, 64, 905–907.
White, W. J. (1964). A history of the centrifuge in aerospace medi-
cine. Santa Monica, CA: Douglas Aircraft Company, Bio­technology Branch.
William Charles Wells (1757–1817) South Carolinian Troy. (1969).
Journal of the American Medical Association, 209(1), 106–107.
2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Ontogeny of the Vestibular
System and Balance
Timothy A. Jones and Sherri M. Jones
introduCtion and baCkground
In the human, embryonic development begins at fer­tilization of the ovum and lasts until the end of the eighth week after fertilization. The fetal period then extends from the ninth week until birth (36 to 40 weeks after fertilization). There are a number of major events occurring during weeks 3 and 4 of embryonic develop­ment that are critical for normal formation of the head and neck, including the ear. This period includes the appearance of the cranial placodes and development of the pharyngeal apparatus. Disturbances in these and other important early processes, as may be pro­duced by genetic variation or exposure to physiologi­cal stressors, teratogens, or other factors, can lead to serious head and neck developmental abnormalities, including deafness and vestibular dysgenesis. Our purpose here is to present the normal ontogeny of ves­tibular sensors. Detailed consideration of the ontogeny of the auditory system as well as the consequences of genetic variation on vestibular and auditory develop­ment is available elsewhere (Jones & Jones, 2011). Con­sidered here are developmental events common to both modalities during the early formation of the inner ear and important differences in developmental programs where appropriate. We begin during embryonic devel­opment and in particular emphasize the appearance of the first outward structural sign of the emerging inner ear, the otic placode. The chapter concludes with ves­tibular functional maturation and subsequent acquisi­tion of postural control and balance.
Detailed knowledge regarding the development of vestibular and auditory function comes largely from the study of animals. Much of the information pre­sented below is based on studies using chick or mouse models, and the corresponding developmental ages in the human are given in weeks post fertilization based on the work of a number of investigators, including Bredberg (1968), Anniko (1983a), Dechesne (1992), Pujol, Lavigne-Rebillard, and Lenoir (1998), Jeffery and Spoor (2004), Sans and Dechesne (1985), and Sulik and Cotanche (2004). Much, if not all, of the postnatal developmental changes observed in mammalian mod­els occur prior to birth in the human. We will indicate human ages estimated or found to correspond to those of animal models, when possible.
During the first week of human development fol­lowing fertilization, the zygote undergoes cleavage to form a blastocyst which then attaches to the uterine wall (i.e., endometrium). By the end of the second week the blastocyst is fully implanted within the endome­trium and has formed the bilaminar embryonic disk (Figures 2–1A and D). The laminae are termed epiblast and hypoblast. The cells of the epiblast will give rise to all the cells of the adult. Cells of the hypoblast will form extra-embryonic structures. The basic anatomical axes and planes illustrated are already established by this stage prior to morphogenesis, which is initiated during gastrulation (week 3). The orientation of axes and planes shown are standard conventions and will be referenced throughout the chapter.
Morphogenesis begins with gastrulation, which is a process of epiblast cellular proliferation and migration
15
16 BALANCE FUNCTION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT
D
C
a
a
https://t.me/medicina_free
A.
Epiblast
Hypoblast
Superior/Cranial
C.
A/V P/D
Inferior/Caudal
A
Anterior Cranial
R
Embryonic
disc
B.
Connecting
stalk
L
V
Cranial
Rostral
V
Caudal
Dorsal
Ventral
P
D.
D
Two dimensional
dorsal view
Posterior Caudal
Intersecting planes
L
transverse
median
horizontal
A
R
P
figure 2–1. Anatomical axes and planes in the developing embryo. A. Isolated 3-dimen- sional bilaminar embryonic disk with connecting stalk. B. median (also called sagittal plane) and horizontal. the left-right ( terior (AP) and dorsal-ventral axes. left-right axes. C. Anatomical directions in the adult human, embryo, and one amphibian species. D. Schematic representation of an isolated bilaminar embryonic disk as seen from the dorsal view. Anterior-posterior and left-right axes are shown as dashed lines. From Genetics, Embryology, and Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems (2011) (p. 98) by Sherri M. Jones and Timothy A. Jones.
LR) and dorsal-ventral (DV) axes. The medial plane contains the anterior-pos-
The horizontal plane contains the anterior-posterior and
to produce three distinct germ layers: the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. All tissues develop from these three germ layers. With the induction of the neu­ral plate, progression of neurulation, and formation of the neural tube, a systematic regional segmentation emerges, which distinguishes the forebrain (prosen­cephalon), midbrain (mesencephalon), and hindbrain (rhomencephalon) of the incipient brain. The hind­brain is further segmented into seven neuromeres (rhombomeres), where the cells of each neuromere
Intersecting planes: transverse,
The transverse or lateral plane contains
acquire specific identities such that the cells of each neuromere have unique characteristics and collec­tively respond to external signals in a manner that dif­fers from neighboring segments. During this period (week 3), cranial placodes develop from ectodermal regions very near their respective neuromeres. Olfac­tory, visual, and auditory sensory organs as well as cranial sensory ganglia develop from their respective placodes. The inner ear develops from the otic placode (Figure 2–2).
2. ONTOGENY OF THE VESTIBULAR SYSTEM AND BALANCE 17
Otic Vesicle
CD
https://t.me/medicina_free
r6
r5
cross section
24d
OC
OP
D
hindbrain
SE
OP
21–23d
EN
delaminating
neuroblasts
NP
Mesoderm
Notochord
ED
OC
OP
SE
CC
NT
Lens
26–28d
OV
SAG
L
V
Figure 2–2. Formation of the otic vesicle (OV) from the otic placode (OP) over a period from approximately 3 to 4 weeks in the human embryo (follow arrows: 21–23 to 28–35 days post fertilization. [E8.5 to just beyond E10.5 in mouse]). d = days post fertilization.
D = endolymphatic duct; EN = endoderm; CC = central canal; CD = cochlear duct; D =
E dorsal; L = lateral; Mesoderm = mesenchyme presumptive mesoderm; NP = neural plate; NT = neural tube; OC = otic cup; OP = otic placode; OV = otic vesicle; r5-r6 = rhombomeres 5 and 6; SAG = statoacoustic ganglion; SE = surface ectoderm (epidermis); V = ventral. From Genetics, Embryology, and Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems (2011) (p. 158) by Sherri M. Jones and Timothy A. Jones.
OV
FORMATION OF THE OTIC
PLA
CODE AND OTIC VESICLE
The inner ear is formed from primordial ectodermal cells near neuromeres (rhombomeres) 5 and 6 in the embryonic hindbrain. These cells form a flat, thickened patch of ectoderm called the otic placode during week 3
SAG
28–35d
(see Figure 2–2). The otic placode appears morphologi­cally as the first step in the formation of the inner ear. A variety of genetic signals define a region of tissue committed to form the otic placode, and subsequent molecular signaling leads to the separation of the otic placode from epidermal tissue (reviewed by Ohyama, Groves, & Martin [2007]). According to Groves (2005), the cells ultimately forming the placode are not simply
18 BAlAnCE FunCtion AssEssmEnt And mAnAgEmEnt
https://t.me/medicina_free
gathered from adjacent cells, but rather it appears likely that the cells migrate from a wide area and somehow collect to form the placode.
Cells of the otic placode give rise to the otic vesicle (also called the otocyst) at about week 4 (day 26), from which sensory, nonsensory, and most neural cells of the inner ear will be derived (see Figure 2–2). The otic ves­icle, however, does not give rise to olivocochlear and vestibular efferent fibers or to autonomic innervation of blood vessels. Shortly after forming, the otic placode begins to bend and fold inward, producing a shallow dimple. This invagination of ectoderm continues until a deep pit is formed, which is called the otic pit or otic cup (see Figure 2–2). The dorsal edge of the otic tis­sue remains in close approximation to the hindbrain/ neural plate during this process. This association favors molecular signaling and formation of asymmetric molecular signal fields. Ultimately, the otic cup closes to form the otic vesicle. Closure of the otic cup and the proximal neural groove (thus forming the neural tube locally) occurs at about the same time during week 4.
During and after its formation, the otic vesicle is influenced by signals from the hindbrain as well as the mesenchyme surrounding the otic vesicle (known as the periotic mesenchyme or mesoderm) that becomes the bony labyrinth of the inner ear. Several important signaling molecules play a dominant role in establish­ing the dorsal-ventral morphological axis within the otocyst. The dorsal-ventral boundary of the otic vesi­cle (a line midway between the bottom and top of the otic vesicle) distinguishes the dorsal vestibular sensors from the ventral cochlear sensors. Molecular signals are thought to form gradients of influence along the dor­sal-ventral extent of otic tissue (Schneider-Maunoury & Pujades, 2007). Tissue elements at any given posi­tion experience a unique combination of signal levels and each combination of signals has the potential to favor one program of development or another. Molecu­lar signals within the otocyst and in the surrounding regions are also responsible for the order and layout of structures along the anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of the otic vesicle.
DELAMINATION AND FORMATION OF
THE STATOACOUSTIC GANGLION
the statoacoustic ganglion (Figures 2–2 and 2–3). This process is called delamination; it begins in epithelial regions of the presumptive utricle and cristae as early as week 4 (22 to 28 days) and represents the beginning of neurogenesis. The epithelial neuroblasts divide and ultimately differentiate into auditory and vestibular neurons. Delamination expands to include prosensory regions (i.e., regions containing cells that will become sensory hair cells) within or adjacent to the sacculus and eventually the cochlea. Delamination continues through periods as late as week 9. We will consider the formation of the statoacoustic ganglion in more detail later in the chapter.
FORMATION OF PROSENSORY PATCHES
For warm-blooded vertebrates, there are six or seven sensory patches in the mature inner ear (utricle, sac­cule, cochlea, three cristae, and the macula lagena in birds). This list does not include the very small sensory patch called the crista neglecta, about which little is known (Montandon, Gacek, & Kimura, 1970). The sen­sory epithelia form in close association with the non­sensory components (i.e., cristae with canals, maculae with vestibule, and cochlea with cochlear duct). There is evidence that molecular signals from the sensory patches guide the surrounding nonsensory structures in morphogenesis (reviewed in Bok, Chang, & Wu, 2007).
Before such cooperative signaling can occur, the proneural and prosensory cells must be specified and distinguished from the surrounding epithelium. These precursor “neurosensory” cells (cells that in the future may take on a neural or sensory cell fate) are specified early in the development of the otocyst. A neurosen­sory domain (i.e., region of cells that will become hair cells or neurons) can be identified at late week 4 with the expression of genes that may be viewed as markers for cells destined to become neurons or sensory cells (Bok et al., 2007; Morsli, Choo, Ryan, Johnson, & Wu,
1998). Inactivation of these genes or of corresponding pathways interferes with the formation of the stato­acoustic ganglion and sensory organs. Those cells des­tined to become neural cells will soon delaminate (as described above) while the remaining cells will become the sensory epithelia.
Under the influence of specific proteins, proneural cells (neuroblasts, i.e., cells that will become afferent neurons) detach from and leave the epithelium of the otic cup and vesicle and then migrate medially and ventrally into the mesenchyme, ultimately to form
Sensory Patches
At late week 4, certain regions of the otic vesicle (regions A, B, and C of Figure 2–3) express specific
D
E
ED
https://t.me/medicina_free
P
A
4–5w
V
A
ED
B
C
delaminating
neuroblasts
A
pc
B
5w
hc
ac
um
A
pc
cd
ED
hc
sm
C
cd
5–6w
B
ac
um
C
figure 2–3. Lateral views of locations for important markers of prosensory and sensory domains during development. Regions forming the most dorsal sensory epithelia (cristae of semicircular canals) are distin­guished early by the expression of particular genes (labels A and B), whereas the more ventral regions are marked with a different combination of signals (labeled C). the sensory epithelia of the utricular macula (um), saccular macula (sm) and cochlear duct (cd) in that order. ac = anterior crista. hc = horizontal (lateral) crista. pc = posterior crista. Schematics are based on data from the mouse. Corresponding ages in human are given (weeks post fertilization). Adapted from Bok, Chang, and Wu, 2007 with permission from Interna- tional Journal of Developmental Biology, 51, 526.
The ventral prosensory domains elaborate
A
pc
organ of Corti
ED
hc
sm
9–10w
B
ac
um
C
19
20 BAlAnCE FunCtion AssEssmEnt And mAnAgEmEnt
https://t.me/medicina_free
genes that outline the neurosensory domain, including presumptive cristae, maculae, and cochlear prosensory fields as well as the proneural fields where neuroblasts delaminate. The dorsal fields (A and B of Figure 2–3) are distinguished from ventral prosensory regions (C of Figure 2–3) by being marked with different com­binations of gene signals. The patterns mark and dis­tinguish which domains become cristae and which become macular and cochlear sensors. The pattern of expression for one gene (Otx1) highlights the region of the presumptive lateral (horizontal) canal, and in its absence (Otx1
-/-
) the lateral canal fails to form (Morsli
et al., 1999).
Anteroventral regions of the otocyst form in sequence: first the utricle, then the saccule, and finally the cochlea. As noted above, neuroblasts delaminate from this region and migrate anteriorly to form the statoacoustic ganglion over the period from week 4 to week 9. Initially, there is no distinction between pre­sumptive macular and cochlear regions (see Figure 2–3, week 4); however, development proceeds from dorsal to ventral revealing first the more dorsal utricular mac­ulae (see Figure 2–3, weeks 5 to 6) and then, later, the saccular macula and cochlea (see Figure 2–3, weeks 9 to 10). By week 5, the utricle is clearly segregated and (by late week 5) the saccule is easily recognized, but a clear segregation from cochlear fields is evident only after week 6 (Morsli et al., 1998). Segregation of these macular and cochlear sensory patches requires signals from nonsensory regions of the otic vesicle after week 4 (Nichols et al., 2008). In the absence of such signaling, the utricle, saccule, and cochlea form a combined mal­formed single mosaic sensory epithelium. The progres­sive segregation of sensory epithelia also appears to be linked to the simultaneous delamination process as cells migrate from the prosensory regions to become neurons of the statoacoustic ganglion (Fritzsch et al., 2002).
formation of the CoChlea and
Zone of non-Proliferation
The emerging cochlear duct can be seen initially as a lengthening of the ventral pole of the otocyst begin­ning at about week 5 in humans (see Figure 2–3). The duct continues to extend first ventromedially, then it turns abruptly, anteriorly forming a curved hook by late week 5 (Morsli et al., 1998). This represents initia­tion of the cochlear coil, and by the sixth week a full half turn is achieved (see Figure 2–3). The cochlea will continue to elongate and increase the number of coils (~2.5 turns in the human adult).
At the early stages of cochlea formation (e.g., weeks 5 to 6), the cochlear duct (Figures 2–3 and 2–4B) houses a thick (four to five cells thick) undifferentiated epithelium that forms a ridge or sheet extending from the base to apex. This ridge of cells contains prosensory cells that have segregated ventrally from the sacculus. The ridge contains the presumptive organ of Corti. All cochlear hair cells and supporting cells will arise from this epithelial ridge.
Elongation and coiling of the cochlea continues with the leading edge of extension represented at the apical tip. Beginning at about late week 5, a central strip of the apical epithelial ridge begins to exit the cell cycle and terminate mitosis (Figure 2–4) (Chen, John­son, Zoghbi, & Segil, 2002; Chen & Segil, 1999; Lee, Liu, & Segil, 2006). Over a period of about a week in humans (late week 5 to week 6), a wave of terminal mitosis sweeps along a central strip of the epithelial ridge from the cochlear apex to base. This is followed shortly afterward by a wave of cells exiting the cell cycle, which also moves along the central strip from the cochlear apex to base forming a cellular zone of nonproliferation (ZNP) along the epithelial ridge (see Figure 2–4) (Chen et al., 2002; Chen & Segil, 1999; Lee et al., 2006). These postmitotic cells form the undiffer­entiated prosensory domain of the organ of Corti, and its formation is presumably completed before weeks 7 to 8 in humans (Chen et al., 2002; Chen & Segil, 1999; Lee et al., 2006; Ruben, 1967).
By approximately week 8, the cochlear coil has reached 1.5 turns and the ZNP is in place (Chen & Segil, 1999). The region of the initial ventromedial cochlear extension in the otocyst continues to elongate during the coiling process, thus (importantly) increas­ing the distance between the saccular macula and the first turn of the cochlea (Morsli et al., 1998). Elongation of the cochlear epithelium after weeks 7 to 8 must be accomplished without ZNP cell division, since prosen­sory cells in the ZNP have exited the cell cycle. Com­pletion of the adult number of coils (~2.5 turns) is not accomplished until weeks 9 to 10 (Chen & Segil, 1999; Morsli et al., 1998; Sher, 1971; Suli & Cotanche, 2004). The cochlea continues to elongate in the human from 20 mm to 35 mm between 10 and 16 weeks (Bredberg, 1968; Sulik & Cotanche, 2004).
Coiling and elongation of the ZNP is thought to be accomplished largely through the process of con­vergent extension. For this reason, the cochlea is subject to abnormal morphogenesis (short, thickened organ of Corti) when alterations in planar cell polarity (PCP) sig­naling are present (Jones & Chen, 2007; Kelley & Chen, 2007; McKenzie, Krupin, & Kelley, 2004; Montcouquiol et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2005; Wang, Guo, & Nathans,
2. ONTOGENY OF THE VESTIBULAR SYSTEM AND BALANCE 21
A.
Radial neurites
F
l
a
c
e
O
ZNP
u
e
https://t.me/medicina_free
Cochlear Duct
ZNP
B.
Apical surface
L
5w
Cochlear duct
ROHC
Lumen
RIHC
ZNP
~8w
5.5w
KO
Roof
Floor
oor
7w
8w
M
GER
LER
figure 2–4. A. Formation of the zone of non-proliferation (ZNP, marked gray) in the cochlear duct at four periods of development, based on studies in the mouse model (e.g., Chen et al., 2002, Lee et al., 2006). Corresponding estimated ages for the human are shown. The ZNP appears first in the apex and then sweeps towards the base over the next week (48 hours in mouse). al., 2002, 9 to 10 (P0, mouse). During this latter period of elongation, the sensory epithelium thins and narrows. B. Schematic of the cochlear duct circa week 6 (E14 mouse). According to Lim and Rueda (1992), the greater epithelial ridge (GER) incorporates the region of inner hair cells, whereas the lesser epithelial ridge (LER) incorporates the region where outer hair cells will form. The zone of non-proliferation identifies the epithelial region of prospective inner and outer hair cells. Kolliker’s organ (KO) has been defined a number of ways. Here, Kolliker’s organ includes only that portion of the GER that does not include prospective sensory hair cells. RIHC = region of inner hair cells. ROHC = region of outer hair cells. From Genetics, Embryol- ogy, and Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems (2011) (pp. 164, 166) by Sherri M. Jones and Timothy A. Jones.
The formation of ZNP is completed by approximately week 6 (E14 mouse, Chen et
Lee et al., 2006), however, the cochlea continues to elongate and coil until weeks
Together they form the floor of the early cochlear duct, also called the epithelial ridge.
2006). Mutations in, or knock outs of, core PCP genes (or related signaling pathways) prevent elongation and result in a shortened cochlea. The extent to which
vestibular sensors depend on the convergent exten­sion process is not clear. However, like the cochlea, the vestibular epithelia start out as a layered partition of
22 BAlAnCE FunCtion AssEssmEnt And mAnAgEmEnt
https://t.me/medicina_free
four to five epithelial cells and at maturity are reduced to an apical layer of sensory cells supported by one or two non-sensory cells (Dechesne, 1992). Whether the thinning process involves convergent extension has not been clarified (to our knowledge).
hair Cell differentiation
Before differentiation can begin, vestibular and audi­tory prosensory epithelial cells must complete the last (or terminal) cell division. This is often referred to as terminal mitosis and is an event noted above in the formation of the cochlear ZNP. The postmitotic pro­sensory epithelial cells appear structurally like any other cells in the epithelium. There are no superficial structural distinctions and no obvious evidence of axial polarization. Prosensory cells must initiate differentia­tion before such outward distinctions will appear.
Vestibular afferent and efferent neurons are pres­ent in sensory regions at about week 6. Prosensory cells demonstrate ongoing mitosis at this time. Within vestibular epithelia there are temporal and spatial gra­dients over the course of mitosis. In general, central regions (apex of cristae and striolar regions of macu­lae) initiate and reach peak levels of mitosis well before peripheral regions (base cristae, edges of maculae). Terminal mitosis occurs in a similar order (Mbiene & Sans, 1986; Sans & Chat, 1982). Although these general trends may hold, for any given vestibular region there is a more or less continual eruption of new immature stereociliary bundles until late fetal periods, thus sug­gesting that some cells do not complete terminal cell division until very late.
Differentiation of prosensory cells of the cristae, maculae, and cochlea all require the induction of the gene atonal homolog 1 (Atoh1) (also known as mouse atonal homolog 1, Math1; Bermingham et al., 1999). Prosensory cells exit the cell cycle and ultimately must express Atoh1 before differentiating into hair cells. Atoh1 expression and differentiation of hair cells begin in the cristae and maculae well before similar levels are expressed in the cochlea (Bermingham et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2002; Lanford, Shailam, Norton, Gridley, & Kelley, 2000; Woods, Montcouquiol, & Kelley, 2004). Atoh1 expression is presumably present throughout the sensory epithelium by weeks 8 to 10 and then is downregulated during later fetal periods (Driver et al., 2013; Lanford et al., 2000; Shailam et al., 1999).
During differentiation of the sensory epithelium, a remarkable pattern of hair cells and supporting cells emerges. Our understanding of the molecular signals
orchestrating these events is more detailed for the cochlea than vestibular sensors, but in either case, there are many more questions to answer. One feature of both auditory and vestibular epithelia suggests a com­mon organizing mechanism. The presence of orderly patterned mosaics of hair cells and supporting cells in all inner ear sensory epithelia implies a role for Notch­mediated lateral inhibition (Lanford et al., 1999, 2000). In particular, all epithelia are arranged such that every hair cell is isolated from other hair cells by a ring of supporting cells or their processes. Lateral inhibition is one strategy that produces a “center on, surround off” pattern, where “on” refers to a hair cell and “off” to a non-sensory supporting cell.
In due course across the entire postmitotic sensory epithelium, a molecular scheme can be postulated to produce a mosaic of patches, where each patch is com­posed of a hair cell surrounded by supporting cells. This scheme is simplistic and incomplete, but it pro­vides a basis for us to begin to understand how such mosaics can be shaped by molecular signaling and how the remarkable structures of the vestibular system and cochlea may be formed.
Prior to differentiation, prosensory cells appear as homogeneous epithelial cells interconnected to each other by gap junctions (Dechesne, 1992; Ginzberg & Gilula, 1979). Gap junctions are subsequently lost only in cells committed to a hair cell fate. This occurs during the earliest period of hair cell differentiation (Bryant, Forge, & Richardson, 2005; Forge, Souter, & Denman­Johnson, 1997). Thus, one of the earliest events of hair cell differentiation includes the isolation of hair cells from surrounding supporting cells by eliminating direct electrochemical coupling between them.
Vestibular stereoCiliary bundles
The traditional definitive structural sign of hair cell differentiation is the elaboration of microvilli and formation of stereociliary bundles. Using scanning electron microscopy, vestibular hair cells can be defini­tively identified by about week 8 in the cristae with the appearance of stereociliary bundles (Bryant et al., 2005; Dechesne, 1992; Denman-Johnson & Forge, 1999; Mbiene & Sans, 1986). In contrast, the first morphologi­cal evidence of cochlear stereocilia begins to emerge between weeks 10 and 12 (Anniko, 1983b; Lim & Anniko, 1985; Pujol et al., 1998; Sulik & Cotanche, 2004).
The earliest hair cells appear with microvilli or ste­reocilia encircling a single kinocilium in the center of the cell (Figure 2–5). The first sign of intrinsic hair cell
Developing Vestibular Sensory Epithelium
Week 7 (cristae)
https://t.me/medicina_free
-Undifferentiated epithelial patch
-Microvilli
-Single central cilium
Week 8
-Differentiating hair cells
-Stereocilia surroundcentral kinocilium
-Early polarization
-Tip links may be present
Weeks 8–12
-Lateral and tip stereociliary links present
-Cuticular plate is forming
-Sharp Line of Polarization Reversal
-KC & S height continue to grow
S
HC
BB
Weeks 12–15
KC
S
HC
KC
BB
LPR
E16.5
-Cuticular plate is formed
-Bundle length increases
-KC & S height comparable
-Transduction channels appear
S
HC
S
KC
BB
KC
figure 2–5. Development of vestibular stereociliary bundles. Estimated human ages in weeks post fertiliza­tion are shown. The earliest stages of development are similar for both auditory and vestibular hair cells although vestibular hair bundles begin appearing much earlier than cochlear bundles. Later developmen­tal stages for auditory hair bundles are very different than those for vestibular bundles. Stereociliary bundles for vestibular epithelia are mature by weeks 20 to 23 (Dechesne, 1992). KC = kinocilium; S = stereocilia; HC = hair cell; BB = basal body; LPR = line of polarity reversal; CP = cuticular plate. From Genetics, Embryology, and Development of Auditory and Vestibular Systems (2011) (p. 174) by Sherri M. Jones and Timothy A. Jones.
CP
BB
HC
Maturation and
refinement continues
23