Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2617_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
59 Мб
Скачать
468
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Ciaccio
nostic application for liquid biopsy. In all those cases where the traditional biopsy on a primary tumor is not feasible or informative, the molecular analysis conducted on CTC or ctDNA represents a valid and noninvasive alternative to char­acterize the tumor and select patients for targeted therapies.
Moreover, given the extreme dynamism with which the tumor evolves, it may develop resistance to targeted thera­pies by acquiring mutations that make the molecular target insensitive to the drug’s action. In these cases, the possibility of longitudinal monitoring, i.e., repeating serial controls over time, represents an exciting opportunity to identify the appearance of resistance mutations early. Unlike traditional biopsy, liquid biopsyallows this approach dueto the limited invasiveness of the diagnostic procedure, which involves a simple blood sample.
However, liquid biopsy may have the most signicant impact inthe early cancerdetection and early identication of itsprogression. For example, detection of minimal resid­ual disease after potentially curative therapy may lead to second-line therapies. In patients with localized tumors, evi­dence of CTC or ctDNA could help stratify the risk of recur­rence to select patients who may benet from adjuvant therapy effectively. This approach requires greater analytical sensitivity than is required by mutational analysis for tar­geted therapy, and most technology platforms available today cannot provide it. With the advent of technologies with increasingly higher analytical performance, it is conceivable that liquid biopsy could also be applied in screening high­risk subjects. Finally, the knowledge of CTCs and ctDNA can contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor evolution and its molecular heterogeneity, as well as identifying molecular targets for new drugs.
24h after complete resection of the tumor. The morphology of CTCs is highly heterogeneous. They may be damaged, have an apoptotic phenotype, or a morphology similar to cells in the corresponding tissue biopsy. The proliferative power of CTCs is extremely variable, even within the same patient.
Technologies fortheIsolation ofCTCs
The main limitation in isolating CTCs is that they are extremely rare compared to the total number of blood cells in circulation.
In most patients with tumor, the concentration of CTCs is around less than 10 cells/mL, and only in a few selected cases is it possible to nd several hundred ofCTCs per mL of blood.
In recent years, several technologies have been developed to isolate CTCs. Among the most important technical aspects, in addition to the already mentioned need to select cells at very low concentrations, we must also emphasize the need to ensure the lowest possible degree of molecular or morphological alterations for subsequent characterization. Moreover, keeping the degree of contamination by blood cells lowis desirable.
CTC isolation strategies can be classied generically based on cell selection mode. In particular, we distinguish:
– Methods based on the physical properties of CTCs (e.g.,
cell volume)
– Methods based on immunophenotyping (expression of
specic immunological biomarkers)
– Methods based on removing leukocytes without specic
molecular tags.
Circulating Tumor Cells
CTCs represent a biological material of great relevance because they offer, on the one hand, the possibility to under­standthe biological mechanisms underlying the metastatic spread of the primary tumor and, on the other hand, toevalu­ate the response to primary treatment and to early recognize the progression.
CTCs are released into the circulation from both the pri­mary tumor and metastases. How tumor cells are released into the circulation is not well understood. Active mecha­nisms, in which cells with more signicant metastatic potential, such as those that have undergone epithelial–mes­enchymal transition, and passive diffusion mechanisms of single cells or cell clustersmay be involved. In the circula­tion, CTCs can be found either as isolated cells or in large clusters of more than 50 cells. Once in circulation, CTCs have a short half- life. In patients with localized cancer undergoing surgical therapy, CTCs disappear approximately
Methods Based ontheCTCsPhysical Properties
Tumor cells are often larger than leukocytes (mean diameter 15μm vs. 10μm). Based on this observation, ltration-based isolation methods have been developed. The platforms sup­porting these methods have the advantage of being easy to use, but with a reduced quality of the isolated cells, since the passage through a static lter generates hemodynamic stress that can compromise the integrity of CTCs. This approach is also limited by the extreme variability of tumor cell volume, sometimes even smaller than that of leukocytes, and by the fact that patients undergoing chemotherapy may present bone marrow megakaryocytes in the circulation. Other isola­tion methods based on the physical properties of CTCs exploit their different density, electrical charge, or photo­acoustic resonance.
34 Liquid Biopsy
https://t.me/medicina_free
469
Immuno-phenotyping Methods
These CTC isolation methods are based on antibodies tar­geted to antigens expressed explicitly by tumor cells. This approach is among the most widespread and is exploited by some instrumental platforms, among which the best known is CellSearch®. The latter evaluates the contextual expression of several markers: a membrane marker, the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), and cytoplasmic markers, epi­thelial cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19 (CK). Based on this tech­nology, CD45+ leukocytes are negatively selected and excluded from the analysis, while CTC nuclei are evaluated by DAPI staining. Briey, after immunomagnetic capture by EpCAM recognition and enrichment, reagents are added to identify and count CTCs. Ultimately, the system recognizes as CTCs those cells whose characteristics correspond to those of a tumor cell, i.e., cells with EpCAM+, CK+, DAPI+, and CD45-phenotype.
Methods Based ontheLeukocytesRemoval
Among the new microuidic CTC isolation strategies, the most promising is the removal of leukocytes from the whole blood sample, leaving unlabeled CTCs for subsequent molecular characterization. This technology’s biological rationale is that leukocyte markers are well characterized while tumor cells can express different markers, even in the same patient. In addition, non-epithelial tumors, such as mel­anoma, do not express EpCAM, while others undergo epi­thelial–mesenchymal transition, which results in the loss of EpCAMexpression and otherepithelial markers. In the so­called CTC-iChip, an integrated microuidic device, magne­tophoresis rst separatesthe nucleated cells from the other blood components (platelets, erythrocytes, plasma). In the second step, the leukocytes are discarded by immunological marking. With this technology, the yield, i.e., the recovery of CTCs, is 97%, starting from a sample of 8 mL of whole blood. Moreover, the methodology is compatible with the standard cytopathological and molecular analyses foreseen for CTCs.
Molecular Characterization ofCTCs
Once isolated, CTCs should be counted and characterized. The classic characterization criterion is positivity for the cytokeratin marker and negativity for the leukocyte antigen CD45. Characterization of CTCs is performed by uores­cence microscopy, although not all platforms are equipped with a sufcient number of channels for staining with mul­tiple markers.
Although early studies of CTCs have suggested that their absolute value is associated with poorer survival, the kinetics of CTCs assessed post-therapy are of great clinical signi­cance. Indeed, it has been shown that CTCs decrease rapidly
in patients with a good therapeutic response. Interestingly, while CTC count in individual patients with advanced tumors correlates with clinical response to treatment, it does not cor­relate with tumor mass as assessed both morphologically, by imaging techniques, and biochemically by circulating tumor markers.
Molecular characterization of CTCs can also be per­formed by evaluating the expression of specic RNAs. Preliminary studies have demonstrated the efcacy of the analysis of specic translocations (e.g., EML4-ALK in non­small- cell lung cancer and TMPRSS2-ERG in prostate can­cer) on CTCs.
Finally, the recent introduction of NGS techniques has allowed an increasing characterization of CTCs, opening exciting scenarios on tumor biology and the diagnostic potential of these methods.
Circulating Tumor DNA
The presence of cell-free DNA in circulation has been widely documented. All living cells release discrete amounts of free DNA into circulation. Following normal cell turnover, cells in apoptosis release DNA fragments into the circulation. Under physiological conditions, apoptotic and necrotic cells are rapidly removed, and cfDNA levels are relatively low. More than 90% of healthy individuals have less than 25ng of cfDNA per mL.Under certain path­ological conditions, including inammation, exercise, tis­sue injury, or surgery, cfDNA levels can increase signicantly. Generally, cfDNA levels can increase up to magnitude even in patients with tumors. More specically, ctDNA refers to the proportion of free DNA released from cancer cells. Thus, in patients with cancer, a fraction of cfDNA derives from the tumor and is referred to as ctDNA. The ctDNA can originate from primary tumors, metastatic lesions, or CTCs. The fraction of ctDNA relative to the total circulating free DNA can range from <0.1% to >10%. The mechanisms of ctDNA release have not yet been elucidated. Proposed hypotheses include passive mechanisms, such as cell necrosis, and controlled release mechanisms, such as apoptosis. The hypothesis that ctDNA may result from cell necrosis is supported by the observa­tion that more advanced stage tumors, characterized by a higher degree of necrosis, are associated with higher levels of ctDNA.The hypothesis that ctDNA is released following apoptosis is supported by its high degree of fragmentation. Indeed, ctDNA is typically fragmented into segments of the same length, 160–180 bp, as the nucleosome-protected DNA observed in apoptotic cells. CtDNA can also be released within exosomes, although this mode appears more appropriate for low-molecular-weight nucleic acids such as miRNAs (Fig.34.1).
470
Pr
CTCs release ctDNA
https://t.me/medicina_free
imary cancer/
metastasis
Release of ctDNA
Secretion
Necrosis
Apoptosis
Release of CTC
CTC
M. Ciaccio
Point mutations Rearrangements Insertions/deletions
ctDNA
Fig. 34.1 Primary tumor and/or metastasis release ctDNA into the cir­culation by secretion, necrosis, and apoptosis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), another source of ctDNA, are also released. The ctDNA has the
The clearance of ctDNA occurs in the spleen, kidney, and liver. Its half-life is very short, 16min according to some Authors, about 1h for the rapid phase, and 13h for the late phase, according to others. In any case, the half-life ismuch shorter than many of the protein markers.
same alterations as the tumor cell of origin (point mutations, large rear­rangements, insertions, deletions) and can be subjected to molecular analysis. (Copyright EDISES 2021. Reproduced with permission)
able methods is often insufcient to identify ctDNA mole­cules, which in some cases represent little more than 0.01% of total cfDNA.
Isolation of ctDNA is far more feasible than that of CTCs;
however, two factors make manipulation difcult:
The ctDNA can provide quantitative information by mea­suring the number of copies in the circulation, and qualitative information, by searching for tumor-specic mutations. In the rst case, given the extreme interindividual variability of ctDNA levels, it would seem to be the kinetics of ctDNA,
– The extreme interindividual variability in ctDNA
concentration;
– The “dilution” effect of circulating ctDNA because a
large amount of cfDNA from healthy cells is present and therefore its variations over time, rather than its absolute value, to provide clinically useful information about the effectiveness of therapy or the onset of relapse. In the second case, i.e., ctDNA mutational analysis, diagnostic applica­tions are based on the fact that mutations in ctDNA corre­spond exactly to mutations in the primary tumor, including both point mutations and copy number variations and rearrangements.
The most variable stage is preanalytical, particularly sam-
ple collection, handling, and storage. It is preferable to use EDTA-plasma rather than serum since coagulation may result in the breakdown of leukocytes with subsequent release of wild-type DNA and further dilution of ctDNA.Commercially available methods typically require
1.5–2mL of plasma. The stability of ctDNA is limited by the presence of circulating DNA activity, so sample processing should occur within hours of collection. Subsequent quanti-
Technologies forctDNA Isolation
cation is also not without criticality. In addition, other non-
oncologic diseases may affect cfDNA levels. Theoretically, since the tumor-specic mutations sought in ctDNA are not present in normal cells, it could represent an excellent opportunity to identify the presence of a tumor
ctDNA Mutational Analysis
mass noninvasively. However, ctDNA analysis to date is not helpful for diagnosis, detection of minimal residual disease, or prognostication because the sensitivity of currently avail-
The mutational analysis of ctDNA can be carried out basi-
cally by two approaches: a targeted one, i.e., aimed at nding
34 Liquid Biopsy
https://t.me/medicina_free
471
known mutations that fall in mutational hot spots of specic genes known to be associated with cancer (e.g., KRAS, EGFR, and BRAF in lung cancer, colon, and melanoma, respectively), and a non-targeted one, based on NGS tech­niques. In the latter case, knowledge of specic tumor­associated mutations is not requiredHowever,any molecular alteration in the ctDNA is identied within the limits of the analytical sensitivity of the method. Among the disadvan­tages of massive sequencing methods are the limited analyti­cal sensitivity, the still high costs, and the difculties in interpreting the results forclinical purposes.
Initially, the analysis of known point mutations of ctDNA (targeted approach) was performed by end-point Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR. More recently, digital-PCR, ARMS-PCR, or BEAMing technology have been developed to achieve higher analytical sensitivity. Most of these methods, however, allow the analysis of only a few loci; mutations in genes that do not present mutational hot spots, such as oncosuppressors, are not detected.
Application ofLiquid Biopsy toNon-small­Cell Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is characterized by several driver mutations, the best known of which are EGFR point mutations, ALK-EML4 translocations, and RAS mutations. There are now targeted drugs, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), which act only if the tumor has some of these mutations (target therapy). These therapies have doubled patient survival. However, after treatment with these drugs, it is possible to observe a tumor progression caused by developing resistance mecha­nisms that make these therapies ineffective. In some cases, the molecular mechanisms of resistance have been identied and include specic mutations in the molecular targets of the drug itself. This is the case of EGFR in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). It has been shown that the molecular alter­ations of these tumors are not homogeneously distributed (tumor heterogeneity) and that metastases may present a mutational prole completely different from that of the pri­mary tumor, making molecular analysis crucial when tumor progression is observed. Until now, tissue biopsy is consid­ered the gold standard for molecular investigations but is limited by some factors, including its invasiveness, the impossibility of accessing some sites, tumor heterogeneity, and reduced patient compliance. In contrast, searching for specic mutations of the EGFR gene on plasma (ctDNA) is a noninvasive investigation that allows longitudinal monitor­ing by serial sampling over time. For these reasons, liquid biopsy is a valuable tool for selecting those patients with NSCLC whocould benet from treatment with TKIs.
The EGFR gene encodes for a transmembrane protein with an extracellular ligand-binding domain (EGF, TGFα), a
single transmembrane hydrophobic domain, and an intracel­lular domain with tyrosine kinase activity. The activation of the receptor is followed by dimerization, autophosphoryla­tion, and subsequent activation of several signal transduction pathways that regulate the processes of cell survival and/or apoptosis, angiogenesis (PIK3-AKT, JAK-STAT), cell dif­ferentiation and migration (RAS-RAF-MEK). The mecha­nism of action of TKI drugs involves their competition with ATP for binding to the receptor and blocking signal trans­duction. However, in unselected patients, the response to TKIs is limited to 10% of cases. These therapies’ success depends on activating mutations, including exon 19 deletions (Ex19Del) and L858R, which account for 85% of EGFR mutations. These mutations are considered oncogenic. They constitutively activate the EGFR receptor without ligand, supporting the survival and antiapoptotic signal via PI3K­AKT and ERK-MAPK.
These mutations, in addition to being “activating” against EGFR, make the cell sensitive to TKIs because they increase the afnity of EGFR for the drug by 5–10 times compared to the wild-type receptor. This allows the inhibition of EGFR without toxicity at an epidermal and gastrointestinal level due to the blockade of EGFR in healthy cells. As already mentioned, usingTKIs over time leads to the establishment of resistance in 60% of treated patients. From a molecular point of view, a possible cause is the occurrence of some mutations in EGFR, among which the best known is T790M.This mutation alters the ATP binding site to which TKIs also bind, thus canceling the sensitization induced by the other activating mutations. In addition to the mutations mentioned above, dozens of other mutations in the EGFR gene have been described whose effect on the activation sta­tus of the EGFR receptor and the action of TKIs has not yet been fully elucidated. These are uncommon and often asso­ciated with more frequent mutations, such as L858R or exon 19 deletions (Table34.1).
In 2014, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) approved the use of plasma to assess EGFR mutational status in patient candidates for TKIstreatment. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and positive for L858R activating mutations or exon 19 deletions on plasma are eligible for treatment with TKIs. Patients with TKI-treated NSCLC who
Table 34.1 Mutations affecting EGFR and indications for the TKI use
Mutation Exon Indications for the TKIs use L858R 21 Yes Ex19Del 19 Ye s T790M 20 No G719X 18 Yes? Ex20Ins 20 No? S768I 20 No? L861Q 21 No?
TKI Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
472
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Ciaccio
have the T790M mutation on plasma are eligible for treat­ment with new third-generation TKIs, which have been shown to be effective in progression after treatment with rst- and second-line TKIs caused by the occurrence of the EGFR T790M mutation.
Application ofLiquid Biopsy toOther Neoplasms
The study of CTCs and ctDNA has broadened our knowl­edge of tumor biology, opening new perspectives on the potential diagnostic applications that can be derived from them. Among the most promising examples of the clinical­assistance implications are breast, ovarian, prostate, colorec­tal, hepatocarcinoma, and melanoma.
In breast cancer, it remains essential to identify those patients undergoing surgery who may benet from adjuvant therapy. In these cases, identifying ctDNA or CTC after sur­gery could be decisive in planning appropriate follow-up programs. In particular, PIK3CA mutations in plasma before and after surgery have been associated with minimal residual disease. Moreover, the presence of CTC after the start of treatment correlates signicantly with a lower PFS (Progression Free Survival) and OS (Overall Survival) and, therefore, with a worse prognosis.
Recommended Readings
Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K (2013) Circulating tumor cells: liquid
biopsy of cancer. Clin Chem 59:110–118 Ashworth TR (1869) A case of cancer in which cells similar to those
in the tumors were seen in the blood after death. Aust Med J
14:146–149 Attard G, Swennenhuis JF, Olmos D, Reid AH, Vickers E, A’Hern R
etal (2009) Characterization of ERG, AR and PTEN gene status in
circulating tumor cells from patients with castration-resistant pros-
tate cancer. Cancer Res 69:2912–2918 Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Want Y, Agrawa N etal
(2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage
human malignancies. Sci Transl Med 6:224ra24 Bidard FC, Peeters DJ, Fehm T et al (2014) Clinical validity of
circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic breast can-
cer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol
15(4):406–414 Cho EH, Wendel M, Luttgen M, Yoshioka C, Marrinucci D, Lazar
D etal (2012) Characterization of circulating tumor cell aggre-
gates identified in patients with epithelial tumors. Phys Biol
9:016001 Cohen SJ, Alpaugh RK, Gross S, O’Hara SM, Smirnov DA, Terstappen
LW etal (2006) Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor
cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal
Cancer 6:125–129 Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC
etal (2004) Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and sur-
vival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:781–791
Danila DC, Heller G, Gignac GA, Gonzalez-Espinoza R, Anand A,
Tanaka E etal (2007) Circulating tumor cell number and prognosis in progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:7053–7058
Dawson SJ, Tsui DW, Murtaza M, Biggs H, Rueda OM, Chin SF etal
(2013) Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368:1199–1209
Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M etal
(2008) Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med 14:985–990
Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (2003)
Trans- forming single DNA molecules into uorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8817–8822
Engelman JA, Settleman J (2008) Acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase
inhibitors during cancer therapy. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18:73–79
Fan HC, Blumenfeld YJ, Chitkara U, Hudgins L, Quake SR (2010)
Analysis of the size distributions of fetal and maternal cell-free DNA by paired-end sequencing. Clin Chem 56:1279–1286
Gascoyne PR, Noshari J, Anderson TJ, Becker FF (2009) Isolation of
rare cells from cell mixtures by dielectrophoresis. Electrophoresis 30:1388–1398
Gertler R, Rosenberg R, Fuehrer K, Dahm M, Nekarda H, Siewert JR
(2003) Detection of circulating tumor cells in blood using an opti­mized density gradient centrifugation. Recent Results Cancer Res 162:149–155
Karabacak NM, Spuhler PS, Fachin F etal (2014) Microuidic, marker-
free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samples. Nat Protoc 9(3):694–710
Leon SA, Shapiro B, Sklaroff DM, Yaros MJ (1977) Free DNA in
the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer Res 37:646–650
Liotta LA, Saidel MG, Kleinerman J (1976) The signicance of hema-
togenous tumor cell clumps in the metastatic process. Cancer Res 36:889–894
Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura
CV etal (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung­cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359:366–377
Mandel P, Metais P (1948) Les acides nucleiques du plasma sanguin
chez l'homme. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 142:241–243
Ozkumur E, Shah AM, Ciciliano JC, Emmink BL, Miyamoto DT,
Brachtel E et al (2013) Inertial focusing for tumor antigen­dependent and -independent sorting of rare circulating tumor cells. Sci Transl Med 5:179ra47
Perkins G, Yap TA, Pope L, Cassidy AM, Dukes JP, Riisnaes R etal
(2012) Multi-purpose utility of circulating plasma DNA testing in patients with advanced cancers. PLoS One 7:e47020
Pilotto S, Rossi A, VavalaÃÄ T etal (2018) Outcomes of rst-generation
EGFR-TKIs against non-small-cell lung cancer Harboring uncom­mon EGFR mutations: a post hoc analysis of the BE-POSITIVE study. Clin Lung Cancer 19(1):93–104
Qian H, Gao F, Wang H, Ma F (2014) The efcacy and safety of
crizotinib in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. BMC Cancer 19(14):683
Reck M, van Zandwijk N, Gridelli C etal (2010) Erlotinib in advanced
non-small cell lung cancer: efcacy and safety ndings of the global phase IV Tarceva lung cancer survival treatment study. J Thorac Oncol 5(10):1616–1622
Siravegna G, Bardelli A (2014) Genotyping cell-free tumor DNA in the
blood to detect residual disease and drug resistance. Genome Biol 15(8):449
Stroun M, Anker P, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Maurice PA (1987) Isolation
and characterization of DNA from the plasma of cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:707–712
34 Liquid Biopsy
https://t.me/medicina_free
473
Stroun M, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Olson-Sand A, Anker P (2001) About
the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNA apoptosis
and active DNA release. Clin Chim Acta 313:139–142 Stott SL, Lee RJ, Nagrath S, Yu M, Miyamoto DT, Ulkus L etal (2010)
Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from
localized and metastatic prostate cancer patients. Sci Transl Med
2:25ra23 Tu HY, Ke EE, Yang JJ etal (2017 Dec) A comprehensive review of
uncommon EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung
cancer. Lung Cancer 114:96–102 Vona G, Sabile A, Louha M, Sitruk V, Romana S, Schutze K etal (2000)
Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells: a new method for the
immunomorphological and molecular characterization of circulat-
ing tumor cells. Am J Pathol 156:57–63
Yamada T, Nakamori S, Ohzato H, Oshima S, Aoki T, Higaki N etal
(1998) Detection of K-ras gene mutations in plasma DNA of patients with pancreatic adeno- carcinoma: correlation with clinico­pathological features. Clin Cancer Res 4:1527–1529
Yu M, Stott S, Toner M, Maheswaran S, Haber DA (2011) Circulating
tumor cells: approaches to isolation and characterization. J Cell Biol 192:373–382
Wang JY, Hsieh JS, Chang MY, Huang TJ, Chen FM, Cheng TL etal
(2004) Molecular detection of APC, K-ras, and p53 mutations in the serum of colorectal cancer patients as circulating biomarkers. World J Surg 28:721–726
Weight RM, Dale PS, Viator JA (2009) Detection of circulating mela-
noma cells in human blood using photoacoustic owmetry. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009:106–109
Biological Fluids
https://t.me/medicina_free
GaetatoBernardi, CosimoOttomano, andSabrinaBuoro
35
Introduction
Unlike blood, biological uids are not always repeatable materials that provide clinical information otherwise unavail­able to the caregiver. Despite their importance, their diagnos­tic power is not always known, nor are the pre-analytical precautions that should be part of the cultural baggage of anyone requesting a laboratory test. Biological uids are divided into serous (peritoneal, pleural, pericardial), syno­vial, and cephalorachidian. For each of these, the biochemis­try and cellular analysis tests of major interest in nonspecialist medicine are briey described.
This chapter only touches on topics such as analytics, which are fundamental for specialists in laboratory medi­cine. However, it is worth mentioning here a fundamental concept in clinical biochemistry: the matrix. This is dif­ferent between blood and biological fluids; for this rea­son, the determination of a measurand in the former creates different problems in the latter, forcing the spe­cialist to verify the reliability of analytical methods in each area.
Reference values (RV) are critical to classify the individ­ual health status. Unfortunately, the literature is not com­pletely univocal in this regard, so it is highly advisable to always refer to the RV of the laboratory.
Pathophysiology
The serous (pericardial, peritoneal, and pleural) and articular cavities physiologically contain minimal quantities of uid, similar to plasma in color and chemical-physical characteris­tics, whose function is essentially lubricating, favoring the endocavitary sliding of the viscera, covered by a serous membrane like the cavities that contain them.
The serous liquids are continuously formed by ultraltra­tion of the plasma and, in part, are reabsorbed through the capillaries of the serosae, so that the quantity and composi­tion remain constant. Liquids result from a dynamic process of formation and reabsorption in a game of pushes and counter- pushes of hydrostatic and colloid-osmotic pressure. In addition to this mechanism, there is also capillary perme­ability and lymphatic drainage.
Excess production or reduced reabsorption results in dis­ease. These phenomena are pathognomonic of each cavity (pleural, pericardial, peritoneal, and articular).
In pathological conditions, for inammatory, neoplastic, or traumatic lesions of the endocavitary organs, sometimes for an inammatory or neoplastic pathology of the serosae themselves, the amount of intracavitary uid increases, resulting in an effusion whose chemical-physical and cyto­logical characteristics are modied according to the patho­genic noxa, with common etiopathogenic features.
It is good practice to obtain the concentrations of the mea­surands useful for diagnosis in the affected uid and on the serum/plasma at the same time.
G. Bernardi (*) IRCSS Fondazione Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy
C. Ottomano Research Laboratory, Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientico (IRCCS) Synlab SDN Spa, Naples, Italy
S. Buoro Regional Reference Center for the Quality of Laboratory Medicine Services, Milan, Italy
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 M. Ciaccio (ed.), Clinical and Laboratory Medicine Textbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24958-7_35
475
476
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Bernardi et al.
Types ofAnalysis
The main laboratory tests useful for assessing any alterations in the endocavitary organs are macroscopic analysis and cytometric and biochemical examination.
Macroscopic Analysis
The color and appearance of uids in pathologic effusions may vary based on their different etiologies. The appearance is usually clear and straw yellow in transudates.
Other colorations of pathological effusions include red, brown, green, white, and black. The presence of blood gives the uid a red coloration, erythrocyte lysis, and oxidation of hemoglobin to methemoglobin result in a brownish (brown) coloration. If the uid has a frankly hematic appearance, the determination of the hematocrit, or rather the count of the hematocrits, can help to distinguish between massive bleed­ing and serous effusion. A greenish coloration indicates the presence of bile. Fluids with a whitish coloration indicate pus or chyle; in subjects with melanoma, a blackish color­ation may be observed. The ascitic uids of jaundiced patients assume a particularly pronounced yellow coloration.
The appearance, in addition to being clear, maybe tur­bid or opalescent. The turbid appearance of the uids is caused by increased cellularity or triglyceride concentra­tion, while the chylous effusion may have an opalescent appearance.
Differential cell counting is performed by light micros­copy on cytocentrifugate, after panoptic staining (May­Grünwald Giemsa MGG or Wright). The cytocentrifugation allows the concentration of the cells, dispersed in the liquid, in a small circular area of the slide, where they appear in monolayer.
Each individual cell population is expressed as an abso­lute value and/or as a percentage, depending on the type of liquid examined and the decision thresholds.
Cytometric analysis can also be performed by automatic analyzers, reducing costs and reporting times. The disper­sion of the replicates of the measurements (imprecision) also improves.
The cellular analysis of biological uids represents one of the main diagnostic criteria in the evaluation of the effusion etiopathogenesis.
The cellular component of the uids is generally made up of leukocytes (neutrophil granulocytes, lymphocytes, mono­cytes, more rarely eosinophilic and basophilic granulocytes), macrophages/histiocytes, mesothelial cells in cavity effu­sions, and synoviocytes in joint effusions (Figs.35.1, 35.2,
35.3, and 35.4).
Mesothelial cells are large cells with basophilic cyto­plasm on MGG staining (the intensity of basophilia varies according to the state of the cell), regular, slightly eccentric nucleus; sometimes it is possible to see the nucleolus. However, the morphology of mesothelial cells in effusions is varied and is closely inuenced by the time of onset of
Cytometric Examination
The cytometric examination consists in counting the total nucleated elements in the serous uids and their differentia­tion according to morphological characteristics.
For cytometric examination of liquids, with the exception of CSF, the sample must be collected in tubes with antico­agulant (EDTA), mixed both after collection and before anal­ysis. The liquid should be stored at room temperature, and the maximum time that can elapse between collection and analysis is about 2hours.
In synovial uid, the presence of hyaluronic acid, at a strongly acidic pH, causes the formation of a mucin clot that invalidates cell counts. The pre-treatment of the sample with hyaluronidase and the execution of the analysis at slightly acidic pH, or preferably neutral, improve the analysis.
The gold standard procedure for cell counting in biologi­cal uids is light microscopy using a counting chamber (Burker or Thoma chambers for uids of suspected high cel­lularity, or Fuchs-Rosenthal and Nageotte for low cellularity samples).
Fig. 35.1 Pleural effusion of an exudative nature in cytospin prepara­tion with May-Grünwald Giemsa stain (400×), where it is possible to recognize neutrophilic granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes. In addition, well-preserved mesothelial cells are present (large cells with abundant cytoplasm, strongly basophilic, and, in some cases, with small pericytoplasmic vacuoles; the nucleus is regular, slightly eccentric, and sometimes characterized by the presence of a nucleolus), malignant mesothelial cells conserved with numerous vacuoles, andnally mac­rophages (large cells, cytoplasm with many vacuoles, eccentric kidney nucleus and strongly thickened chromatin). Sometimes the morpho­logical distinction among mesothelial cells, macrophages, and mono­cytes can be difcult and is inuenced by the duration of the effusion and/or the time that has elapsed from the time of sampling to the execu­tion of the cytometric analysis
35 Biological Fluids
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 35.2 Peritoneal effusion of a subject with cirrhosis and spontane­ous bacterial peritonitis. Cytospin preparation with May-Grünwald Giemsa staining (1000×), where it is possible to recognize neutrophilic granulocytes, a lymphocyte in the upper right corner, while in the left­most neutrophil granulocyte, in the central group of the image, the phagocytosis of some bacteria
477
Fig. 35.3 Pericardial uid from a healthy subject undergoing surgery. Cytospin preparation with May-Grünwald Giemsa staining (400×), where it is possible to recognize rare neutrophil granulocytes, lympho­cytes, and monocytes. The predominant cell population is represented by mesothelial cells
Fig. 35.5 Pleural effusion of a subject with multiple myeloma evolved into plasma cell leukemia. There are lymphoplasmacytic and plasma cells in the pleural effusion, as in the peripheral blood. The cells present in the pleural effusion are CD138, CD38 positive, and CD56 negative. Cytospin preparation with May-Grünwald Giemsa staining (1000×)
the effusion. It is possible to nd mesothelial cells in mito­sis or binucleated if the hyperplasia is benign. This hetero­geneity sometimes makes it difcult to correctly identify mesothelial cells morphologically with respect to macro­phages and neoplastic cells, so much so that cytochemical, immunocytochemical, or immunouorescence techniques must be used. Finally, in the case of neoplastic effusions, malignant cells of various kinds are also present (Figs.35.5 and 35.6).
Fig. 35.4 Joint effusion of a subject with inammation, characterized by a high number of well-preserved neutrophils and by some rare monocytes, synoviocytes with morphology similar to mesothelial cells. Cytospin preparation with May-Grünwald Giemsa staining (400×)
478
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Bernardi et al.
Fig. 35.6 Peritoneal effusion of undetermined diagnosis; the prepara­tion contains neutrophil granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, meso­thelial cells, and atypical cells of probable neoplastic nature that make up the group of central cells. Subsequent cytological examination con­rms the presence of undifferentiated ovarian cancer metastatic cells. Cytospin preparation with May-Grünwald Giemsa stain (400×)
Pleural Fluid
The pleural cavity is an almost virtual space between the mesothelium of the parietal and visceral pleura, containing a modest amount of uid sufcient to facilitate movement between the two membranes.
Its increase, called pleural effusion, is due either to over­production, mainly in congestive heart failure, or to reduced reabsorption, mostly from lymphatic obstruction during neo­plasms. In summary, the most common conditions causing pleural effusion are heart failure, tumors, tuberculosis, and pulmonary embolism.
In the case of suspected pleural effusion, the patient’s clinical picture can be correctly framed by radiological and/ or ultrasound examinations to conrm its presence. In this case, thoracentesis is performed for both diagnostic and ther­apeutic purposes.
The distinction between exudate (increased capillary per­meability or decreased lymphatic reabsorption), transudate (increased hydrostatic pressure or decreased oncotic pres­sure), and chylous effusion (caused by trauma or neoplasm, usually lymphoma involving the thoracic duct) is a crucial diagnostic step.
Transudates are generally bilateral because they have a systemic etiology.
Exudates are frequently unilateral, associated with disor­ders that increase capillary permeability or interfere with ipsilateral lymphatic reabsorption.
Effusions from malignant neoplasms behave ambigu­ously: unlike what we might expect, they are unlikely to be exudative due to the concomitant presence of congestive heart failure.
Table 35.1
related interpretative criteria
Light’s criteria
Additional criteria
Biochemical analysis performed on the pleural uid and
Parameter Diagnostic cutoff for exudate Pleural uid/serum
protein ratio Pleural uid/serum LDH ratio Pleural uid LDH >2/3 upper limit of the
Pleural liquid cholesterol Pleural liquid cholesterol/serum ratio Pleural uid/serum bilirubin ratio
0.50
0.60
reference range of serum LDH >45mg/dL
>0.30
0.60
The main causes of a transudate are congestive heart fail­ure, liver cirrhosis, hypoproteinemia (e.g., nephrotic syn­drome), infections (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis, or other granulomatous diseases, such as sarcoidosis and his­toplasmosis; viral or mycoplasma pneumonias), neoplasms (bronchogenic carcinoma, metastatic carcinomas, lympho­mas, mesotheliomas), non-infectious inammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]), accumulation of uid of extrapleural origin (e.g., from pan­creatitis with increased lipid-lowering lipid), and exudate (from pancreatitis with increased pancreatic lipase and amy­lase, from esophageal rupture with increased pancreatic enzymes and acid pH, and nally, urinothorax).
The rst step in the biochemical evaluation of the effusion is to determine its origin, either transudative or exudative. For this purpose, Light’s criteria have been widely used in clinical practice over the past four decades (Table35.1).
In their initial work, Light etal. reported a sensitivity of 99% and a specicity of 98% in identifying the type of effu­sion, although in subsequent studies the specicity was lower (65–86%). Despite this limitation, Light’s criteria are con­sidered superior to clinical judgment alone in characterizing effusions.
Macroscopic Evaluation andCellular Analysis
In pleural effusions of transudative origin, the uid is gener­ally clear, light yellow, whereas in those of probable exuda­tive origin (neoplastic or infected), the uid is turbid (Table 35.2). The appearance of the uid may be hemor­rhagic, due to a sample collection not performed well or bleeding. In the latter case, the color of the uid may vary from red to brown depending on the time elapsed between the start of the hemorrhage and the collection.