Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2611_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Authors
- •Preface
- •Dedication
- •YEAR IN REVIEW: KEY CLINICAL UPDATES IN CMDT 2025
- •2. Common Symptoms
- •3. Preoperative Evaluation & Perioperative Management
- •4. Geriatric Disorders
- •6. Dermatologic Disorders
- •7. Disorders of the Eyes & Lids
- •8. Otolaryngology Disorders
- •9. Pulmonary Disorders
- •10. Coronary Artery Disease, Valvular Disease, & Other Key Topics in Cardiology
- •11. Heart Failure & Cardiomyopathy
- •12. Disorders of Cardiac Rhythm
- •13. Systemic Hypertension
- •14. Blood Vessel & Lymphatic Disorders

96
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
medicine, or psychiatry followed by a fellowship in pain
management to learn medication management and interventional techniques for acute, chronic, and cancer pain.
Interventional pain management modalities performed by
pain management specialists involve neuromodulation of
specific targets to alleviate pain. The procedures they perform include percutaneous needle injection of local anesthetics or corticosteroids, radiofrequency (thermal)
lesioning, cryotherapy, chemical neurolysis, or surgical
implantation of intrathecal medication delivery pump systems or neurostimulation devices. While invasive proce-
dures carry their own inherent risks such as bleeding or
infection, they can drastically reduce or even obviate the need
for conventional pharmacologic therapies that may have side
effects or be burdensome to the individual.
For some patients, a nerve block, such as a celiac plexus
block for pain from pancreatic cancer, can provide substantial relief. Intrathecal pumps may be most useful for
patients with severe pain responsive to opioids but who
experience intolerable side effects from systemic medications (eg, sedation, urinary retention, constipation). In the
palliative care setting, these pumps are appropriate when
life expectancy is long enough to justify the discomfort and
cost of surgical implantation.
Clinicians do not need to know all the details of interventional pain procedures but should consider referring
their patients to pain management specialists if standard
treatments are inadequate or associated with intolerable
side effects. For example, a common question is whether
prolonged opioid therapy with its inherent risks is better
than an injection or an implanted device. Beyond knowing
the benefits and risks, fiscal considerations may be key.
Table 5–10 and Table 5–11 list the procedures and the
agents typically used in interventional pain modalities.
Table 5–10. Interventional sites and techniques for
chronic pain by anatomic location. (Listed in alphabetical
order within general location.)
Anatomic sites for neurostimulation
Dorsal column stimulation (spinal cord stimulation)
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation
Peripheral nerve or field stimulation
Joints
Intra-articular injections
Joint denervation procedures
Neuraxial blockage (block in the CNS)
Noncontinuous
Epidural (caudal, lumbar, thoracic, cervical; interlaminar vs
transforaminal)
Intrathecal
Continuous neuraxial drug delivery
Epidural (tunneled catheter, port)
Intrathecal (implanted intrathecal pump)
Paraneuraxial (planar blockade)
Paravertebral (intercostal)
Pectoralis and serratus anterior
Transversus abdominis plane/quadratus lumborum
Peripheral nerve (perineural blockade)
Brachial plexus and branches
Lumbar plexus and branches
Sympathetic ganglion
Celiac plexus
Cervical sympathetic blockade (stellate ganglion)
Ganglion impar
Gasserian ganglion
Lumbar sympathetic blockade
Sphenopalatine ganglion
Superior hypogastric plexus
Krames E, Poree L et al. Implementing the SAFE Principles for
the development of pain medicine therapeutic algorithms
that include neuromodulation techniques. Neuromodulation.
2009;12:104. [PMID: 22151283]
Krames ES … Poree L et al. Using the SAFE principles when
evaluating electrical stimulation therapies for the pain of
failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2011;14:299.
[PMID: 21992423]
Poree L et al. Spinal cord stimulation as treatment for complex
regional pain syndrome should be considered earlier than last
resort therapy. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:125. [PMID:
23441988]
INTRATHECAL DRUG DELIVERY
A. Indications
Intrathecal drug delivery therapy is indicated for patients
with both malignant and nonmalignant pain and has been
shown to be effective, cost-effective, and safe. It is generally
accepted that intrathecal opioids have a 100- to 300-fold
efficacy compared with oral opioids; therefore, the best
candidates may be patients with good analgesic benefit from
opioids but burdensome side effects. Common indications
include cancer pain, chronic low-back pain (in particular,
post-laminectomy syndrome), complex regional pain
syndrome, and other causes of nociceptive or neuropathic
pain. In a randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal therapy with comprehensive medication management
in cancer pain, intrathecal therapy was shown to provide
superior analgesia with fewer side effects and longer life
expectancy. Due to the cost of implanting the device as well
as the recovery time needed from surgical implantation, it
is recommended that patients have a life expectancy of at
least 2–3 months.
B. Procedure
Intrathecal drug delivery systems consist of a pump with a
drug reservoir, typically implanted in the abdominal wall,
connected to a catheter that delivers medications into the
intrathecal space. Initial percutaneous trialing is indicated
for patients with noncancer or cancer pain; such percutaneous trialing may consist of either epidural or intrathecal
delivery of bolus or continuous medication to determine
efficacy and side effect profiles of planned therapeutic
agent(s). Some cancer patients may not undergo a trial to
avoid delaying final implantation. Subsequent implantation
of an intrathecal drug delivery system involves two incisions: one in the spine to accommodate the catheter and
anchor, and another in the lower abdominal region to

PALLIATIVE CARE & PAIN MANAGEMENT
CMDT 2025
97
Table 5–11. Agents used1 in neuromodulatory
therapies. (Listed in alphabetic order within classes.)
Adjuvants
Clonidine
Dexmedetomidine
Others
Chemical neurolysis
Alcohol
Phenol
Corticosteroids
Dexamethasone
Methylprednisolone
Triamcinolone
Neurostimulation
Various patterns, frequency, amplitude, pulse width
Opioids
Hydromorphone
Fentanyl
Morphine
Thermal neurolysis
Cryoanalgesia
Radiofrequency ablation
Voltage-gated sodium channel blockade—local anesthetics
Bupivacaine
Lidocaine
Mepivacaine
Ropivacaine
1
Injected or applied.
List is not comprehensive but includes most commonly used
agents.
create a pocket to hold the pump. The catheter is tunneled
through the lower abdominal and flank subcutaneous tissues to connect to the pump. Both trial and implantation
are typically performed under sedation with local anesthetic infiltration; spinal anesthesia delivered from the
pump itself can also be utilized for pump implantation.
Some patients may require general anesthesia to tolerate
the implantation procedure.
C. Medications Used
According to the Polyanalgesic Conference Consensus
(PACC) guidelines for both malignant and nonmalignant
pain, first-line intrathecal delivery medications include
monotherapy with either morphine or ziconotide, a calcium channel inhibitor. However, the PACC guidelines also
state that de facto practice includes combination therapy
with opioids (eg, fentanyl, hydromorphone) and local anesthetic (eg, bupivacaine) and may include other medications
(eg, baclofen or clonidine). Respiratory depression and
sedation are two of the most concerning side effects of
many intrathecal medications. Side effects of morphine
and fentanyl include nausea, edema, constipation, urinary
retention, and pruritus but at a much lower rate than these
same medications administered systemically. While
ziconotide is FDA-approved, its use is limited due to side
effects including myositis and polyarthralgias as well as
psychiatric and neurologic adverse effects (it is contraindicated in patients with preexisting psychosis).
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
The main advantage of intrathecal delivery therapy is
targeted delivery of medication to the spinal cord with
increased efficacy and diminished side effects compared
with systemic analgesic medications. Intrathecal therapy
has been found to be effective with decreased side effects
and improved analgesia in 80% of cancer patients. The
increased efficacy is due to the 100- to 300-fold increased
potency of intrathecal medication compared with systemic medication. However, intrathecal therapy requires
regular pump refills and may be complicated by rare
adverse events including infections, catheter or pump
malfunctions requiring surgical revision, or development
of catheter tip granulomas, potentially leading to inadequate analgesia or neurologic deficits. Pump batteries may
last from 5 years to 10 years depending on usage. Fatalities surrounding intrathecal therapy have been linked to
respiratory depression when high doses and high cervical
catheters are used or when combined with high systemic
doses of medications; patients must be monitored for
respiratory depression or sedation when initiating or
increasing intrathecal therapeutic agents. Some intrathecal pumps need to be emptied prior to MRI; due to the
magnetic forces of the MRI, the entirety of the drug reservoir could inadvertently open. Therefore, it is critical
that the type of pump is known prior to placing the
patient and pump in an MRI machine. Additionally, anticoagulants and NSAIDs need to be stopped prior to pump
implantation and need to be held briefly after the implantation as well; this temporary cessation imposes the risk
of potentially causing blood clots.
E. Alternatives
For patients with limited life expectancy, continuous epidural drug delivery via an external pump or subcutaneous
port may be more appropriate. Systemic medications delivered orally, intravenously, topically, or even by a subcutaneous infusion (as in palliative care settings) are alternatives
to intrathecal therapy.
Abd-Elsayed A et al. Intrathecal drug delivery for chronic pain
syndromes: a review of considerations in practice management. Pain Physician. 2020;23:E591. [PMID: 33185379]
De Andres J et al. Intrathecal drug delivery: advances and appli-
cations in the management of chronic pain patient. Front Pain
Res (Lausanne). 2022;3:900566. [PMID: 35782225]
Perruchoud C et al. Management of cancer-related pain with
intrathecal drug delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical studies. Neuromodulation. 2022:S1094.
[PMID: 35088743]
Sindt JE et al. Initiation of intrathecal drug delivery dramatically
reduces systemic opioid use in patients with advanced cancer.
Neuromodulation. 2020;23:978. [PMID: 32459393]
Spiegel MA et al. Evaluation of an intrathecal drug delivery pro-
tocol leads to rapid reduction of systemic opioids in the
oncological population. J Palliat Med. 2021;24:418. [PMID:
32640912]

98
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
SPINAL STIMULATION
A. Indications
Spinal stimulation targets neuropathic pain in the trunk
and limbs, such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex
regional pain syndrome, and radiculopathy. There is also
growing literature around its use for neuropathic pain
associated with cancer.
B. Procedure
Neurostimulation devices consist of an implantable pulse
generator typically placed in the flank or abdomen just
under the skin and an array of electrical contacts on small
cylindrical or paddle leads placed in the epidural space.
Neurostimulation devices transmit electrical pulses to the
spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion to block pain transmission. Paddle leads require neurosurgical implantation with
laminotomy (and general anesthesia), while percutaneous
wire leads may be implanted under sedation. Patients
undergo a 3- to 7-day trial during which the leads are
attached to an external battery source and undergo programming with different pulse waveforms to assess therapeutic efficacy prior to surgical implantation of permanent
leads and implantable pulse generator.
C. Stimulation Parameters
Traditional neurostimulation resulted in paresthesias that
were used to mask pain. It was presumed that these paresthesias were the result of stimulation of the dorsal column
axons. Recent studies have revealed that analgesia can be
obtained independent of paresthesias by altering a variety
of spinal cord stimulation parameters, including constant
high-frequency stimulation and burst high-frequency
stimulation. More recent double-blind, randomized, controlled trials have revealed that both functional status and
pain scores could be significantly improved in spinal cord
stimulation systems that adapt the output to the patient’s
individual neural response in a closed loop fashion, thereby
providing long-term improvement in pain relief, sleep,
mood, disability, and opioid reduction. For more focal
neuropathic pain conditions such as postoperative inguinal
nerve injuries or thoracic postherpetic neuralgias, stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion can provide focal analgesia.
These newer, more versatile systems deliver paresthesiafree analgesia with analgesic response rates that have
steadily increased from about 50% with the traditional
devices to about 80%. The newer devices also have greater
longevity, and most are MRI compatible.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
Spinal cord stimulation is a reversible technology that may
provide superior analgesic efficacy while eliminating the
need for systemic medications. Literature suggests spinal
cord stimulation is efficacious in 80–90% of well-selected
patients, such as those with neuropathic low-back pain due
to post-laminectomy syndrome. In fact, spinal cord stimulation has now advanced to a higher position in the
treatment continuum; it can be considered before using
long-term moderate doses of systemic opioids. On the
other hand, because it is a surgical procedure, it may be
associated with complications, such as infection, lead
migration, device malfunction, or neurologic deficits.
While MRIs were contraindicated with some older systems, most newer systems allow for limited MRI imaging.
Batteries may require charging a few times a week but typically do not require replacement for 5–10 years. Similar to
intrathecal pumps, anticoagulants and NSAIDs need to be
stopped prior to implantation of spinal cord stimulation
devices because of the potential risks (eg, bleeding). The
implanting surgeon, prescribing physician, and patient
need to discuss the benefits and risks before proceeding. In
addition, a psychological evaluation is typically performed
prior to initiating therapy to rule out any severe untreated
psychological comorbidities and assess expectation of
treatment and appropriateness of implantation.
E. Alternatives
In addition to medication management for pain, two neuromodulatory techniques may serve as alternatives to dorsal horn and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Peripheral
nerve stimulation is an established technology; it targets
peripheral nerves using a similar system of a lead connected to a pulse generator. It may be most appropriate
when there is a very specific neurologic target. Transcuta-
neous electrical nerve stimulators (TENS) and systemic
pharmacologic therapies are alternatives.
Deer TR et al. A systematic literature review of spine neuro-
stimulation therapies for the treatment of pain. Pain Med.
2020;21:1421. [PMID: 32034422]
Hofmeister M et al. Effectiveness of neurostimulation technolo-
gies for the management of chronic pain: a systematic review.
Neuromodulation. 2020;23:150. [PMID: 31310417]
Kapural L … Poree L et al. Durable multimodal and holistic
response for physiologic closed-loop spinal cord stimulation
supported by objective evidence from the EVOKE doubleblind randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med.
2023:rapm-2023-104639. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID:
37491149]
Mekhail N … Poree L et al; EVOKE Study Group. Durability of
clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of closed-loop spinal
cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain: a secondary
analysis of the Evoke randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol.
2022;79:251. Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:420. [PMID:
35156999]
Mekhail NA … Poree L et al; EVOKE Study Group. ECAP-con-
trolled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of
chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023:rapm2023-104751. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 37640452]
CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK & NEUROLYSIS
A. Indications
A celiac plexus block refers to injection of a long-acting anesthetic (eg, bupivacaine) with or without a corticosteroid (eg,
methylprednisolone); with steroids, the block can provide

PALLIATIVE CARE & PAIN MANAGEMENT
CMDT 2025
99
relief for a few weeks to months. Celiac plexus neurolysis
involves injection of a neurolytic agent (eg, alcohol or phenol);
it may provide pain relief more consistently for 2–6 months.
The most common indication is pancreatic cancer pain, but it
can be used for pain from other malignancies (eg, stomach,
liver, spleen, kidney, and GI tract) or from chronic pancreatitis.
Multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have
shown superiority of celiac plexus neurolysis to medication
management for pancreatic cancer, but evidence of its efficacy
for chronic pancreatitis is more mixed.
B. Procedure
The most common approach is a percutaneous posterior
approach under fluoroscopy guidance, with bilateral needles targeted to the celiac plexus at the level of T12–L1.
Alternatively, ultrasound, CT, or endoscopic guidance can
be used. Minimal sedation is required for the percutaneous
approaches, while heavy sedation or general anesthesia
may be required for endoscopic guidance.
C. Medications Used
Chemical neurolysis with alcohol or phenol is used to extend
the duration of the analgesia to 2 or more months compared
to a block with local anesthetic (eg, bupivacaine) and corticosteroid (eg, methylprednisolone), which produces an analgesic duration of weeks to months. For chemical neurolysis,
ethanol is used most often because it does not require
compounding, and importantly has a lower chance of permanent neurologic damage compared with phenol; however, it is more painful on injection.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
The primary advantage is improved analgesia without need
for systemic medications and their untoward effects. Neurolytic celiac plexus blockade is effective in 70–80% of patients.
Common side effects of celiac plexus interventions include
transient hypotension and transient diarrhea. Transient or
permanent spinal cord damage is rare (0–0.2%) with local
anesthetic, but inadvertent peripheral nerve injury is
increased with the use of alcohol or phenol.
E. Alternatives
Standard pain management is with oral or transdermal
systemic analgesic (eg, opioid) medication. Intrathecal
therapy also is an alternative, especially for cancer pain.
resulting from central or neuroforaminal stenosis in the
cervical, thoracic, or lumbosacral region. Both central and
neuroforaminal stenosis may be caused by degenerative
disk disease, disk herniation, or facet arthropathy. Epidural
corticosteroid injections are relatively safe and are appropriate after conservative measures, such as physical therapy
and analgesic medications, have been tried and found
unsuccessful.
B. Procedure
Fluoroscopy is typically used to assist with visualizing the
bony landmarks; either an interlaminar or a transforaminal
approach can be used. Interlaminar access is obtained by
placing a needle between the lamina of adjacent vertebral
levels, whereas transforaminal access is obtained by inserting a needle through the neuroforamen to access the epidural space. These needle insertion procedures can be
performed with topical local anesthetic or with minimal
sedation.
C. Medications Used
Typically, a particulate corticosteroid such as methylprednisolone is used alone or in combination with a local anesthetic. For the transforaminal approach, where inadvertent
vascular access is more of a concern, a nonparticulate corticosteroid such as dexamethasone may be preferred.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
Epidural corticosteroid injections are advantageous for
patients who have not responded to conservative therapy,
are not surgical candidates, or do not want surgery. The
best evidence of the effectiveness of epidural corticosteroid injections is the short-term improvement of radiculopathy in both the lumbar and cervical regions. In a
Cochrane analysis, side effects were noted in 10–24% of
surgical cases but no side effects were reported for any
conservative treatments. Disadvantages include possible
postdural puncture headache, transient weakness, and,
rarely, permanent neurologic deficits. Patients who are
receiving systemic anticoagulation may need to hold their
anticoagulants before receiving corticosteroid injections,
which could increase their risk of cardiovascular events;
these cases should be discussed with the clinician managing the anticoagulation prior to performing any epidural
corticosteroid injections.
Lau J et al. Interventional anesthesia and palliative care collabo-
ration to manage cancer pain: a narrative review. Can J
Anaesth. 2020;67:235. [PMID: 31571119]
Urits I et al. A comprehensive review of the celiac plexus block
for the management of chronic abdominal pain. Curr Pain
Headache Rep. 2020;24:42. [PMID: 32529305]
EPIDURAL CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION
A. Indications
Epidural corticosteroid injections are indicated for patients
with chronic neck pain, low-back pain, and radicular pain
E. Alternatives
Alternatives include conservative therapy, such as oral
analgesic medication management, physical therapy, pain
psychology, acupuncture, and surgery.
Verheijen EJA et al. Epidural steroid compared to placebo injec-
tion in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur
Spine J. 2021;30:3255. [PMID: 33974132]
Yang S et al. Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treat-
ment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2020;99:e21283. [PMID: 32791709]

100
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
» When to Refer
Patients should be referred to pain management specialists
if they have:
• Pain that does not respond to low-dose systemic opioids at typical doses or the opioids cause major adverse
effects at typical doses.
• Pain that cannot be controlled expeditiously or safely by
other clinicians.
• Neuropathic pain that does not respond to first-line
treatments.
• Complex medication management that requires high
dose of medications, especially long-acting opioids
such as buprenorphine or methadone.
• Severe pain from malignancy, including primary disease (eg, pancreatic cancer) or metastatic disease (eg,
bony metastases).
» When to Admit
• Severe exacerbation of pain not responsive to previous
stable oral opioids given around-the-clock plus breakthrough doses.
• Pain that is so severe that it cannot be controlled at
home.
• Uncontrollable side effects from opioids, including nausea, vomiting, myoclonus, and altered mental status.
• Need for a surgical procedure, such as implantation of
an intrathecal drug delivery pump or neurostimulation
device.

Dermatologic Disorders
Nathan W. Rojek, MD
Scott Worswick, MD
Kanade Shinkai, MD, PhD
Lindy P. Fox, MD
CMDT 2025
6
101
Dermatologic diseases are diagnosed by the types of lesions
they cause. Identify the morphology of the lesion(s) to
establish a differential diagnosis (Table 6–1), and obtain
the elements of the history, physical examination, and
appropriate laboratory and histopathologic tests to confirm
the diagnosis. Specific clinical situations, such as an immunocompromised or critically ill patients, lead to different
diagnostic considerations.
PRINCIPLES OF DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
» Frequently Used Treatment Measures
A. Bathing
Soap should be used only in the axillae and groin and on
the feet by persons with dry or inflamed skin. Soaking in
water for 10–15 minutes before applying topical corticosteroids or emollient enhances their efficacy (Soak and
Smear).
B. Topical Therapy
Nondermatologists should become familiar with a representative agent in each category for each indication
(eg, topical corticosteroid, topical retinoid, etc).
1. Corticosteroids—Topical corticosteroid creams, lotions,
ointments, gels, foams, and sprays are presented in
Table 6–2. Topical corticosteroids are divided into classes
based on potency. Agents within the same class are equivalent therapies; however, prices of topical corticosteroids
vary dramatically. For a given agent, higher lipophilicity
(greasiness) corresponds with increased potency such that
for the same compound and strength an ointment formulation is more potent than a cream which is more potent than
a lotion. The potency of a topical corticosteroid may be
dramatically increased by occlusion (covering with a
water-impermeable barrier) for at least 4 hours. Depending
on the location of the skin condition, gloves, plastic wrap,
moist pajamas covered by dry pajamas (wet wraps), or
plastic occlusive suits can be used. Caution should be used
in applying topical corticosteroids to areas of thin skin
(face, genitals, skin folds). Topical corticosteroid use on the
eyelids may result in glaucoma or cataracts. The clinician
may estimate the amount of topical corticosteroid needed
by using the “rule of nines” (as in burn evaluation; see
Figure 39–2). Approximately 20–30 g is needed to cover
the entire body surface of an adult. Systemic absorption
does occur with topical corticosteroids, but complications
of systemic corticosteroids are rare.
2. Emollients for dry skin (“moisturizers”)—Dry skin is a
result of abnormal function of the epidermis. Emollients
restore the epidermis by promoting keratinocyte differentiation and by producing innate antimicrobials; some
restore skin barrier lipids, including ceramides. Ointments
and creams, rather than lotions, are the best moisturizers.
Emollients are most effective when applied to wet skin.
Plain petrolatum is allergen-free and can be used if allergic
contact dermatitis to topical products is suspected.
The scaly appearance of dry skin may be improved by
emollients with concomitant use of keratolytics including
urea, lactic acid, or glycolic acid–containing products provided no inflammation (erythema or pruritus) is present.
3. Drying agents for weepy dermatoses—If the skin is
weepy from infection or inflammation, drying agents may
be beneficial. The best drying agent is water applied as
repeated compresses for 15–30 minutes, alone or with
aluminum salts (Burow solution, Domeboro tablets).
4. Topical antipruritics—Lotions that contain 0.5% each of
camphor and menthol (Sarna) or pramoxine hydrochloride 1% (with or without 0.5% menthol, eg, Prax, PrameGel,
Aveeno Anti-Itch lotion) are effective antipruritic agents.
Hydrocortisone, 1% or 2.5%, may be incorporated for its
anti-inflammatory effect (Pramosone cream, lotion, or
ointment). Doxepin cream 5% reduces pruritus but may
cause drowsiness. Pramoxine and doxepin are most effective when applied with topical corticosteroids. Topical
capsaicin and lidocaine can be effective in some forms of
neuropathic itch.
C. Systemic Antipruritic Drugs
1. Antihistamines and antidepressants—H1-blockers are
the agents of choice for pruritus due to histamine, such as
urticaria. Otherwise, they appear to benefit itchy patients
only by their sedating effects. Hydroxyzine 25–50 mg

102
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 6
Table 6–1. Morphologic categorization of skin lesions and diseases.
Pigmented Freckle, lentigo, seborrheic keratosis, nevus, blue nevus, halo nevus, melanoma
Scaly Psoriasis, dermatitis (atopic, stasis, seborrheic, chronic allergic contact or irritant contact), xerosis (dry skin),
Vesicular Herpes simplex, varicella, herpes zoster, pompholyx (vesicular dermatitis of palms and soles), vesicular
Weepy or encrusted Impetigo, acute contact allergic dermatitis, any vesicular dermatitis
Pustular Acne vulgaris, acne rosacea, folliculitis, candidiasis, miliaria pustulosa, pustular psoriasis, any vesicular
Figurate (“shaped”) erythema Urticaria, erythema multiforme, erythema migrans, cellulitis, erysipelas, erysipeloid, arthropod bites,
Bullous Impetigo, blistering dactylitis, pemphigus, pemphigoid, porphyria cutanea tarda, drug eruptions,
Papular Hyperkeratotic: warts, corns, seborrheic keratoses
1
Pruritus
Nodular, cystic Erythema nodosum, furuncle, cystic acne, follicular (epidermal) inclusion cyst, metastatic tumor to skin
Photodermatitis Drug eruption, polymorphic light eruption, lupus erythematosus
Morbilliform Drug eruption, viral infection, secondary syphilis
Erosive Any vesicular dermatitis, impetigo, aphthae, lichen planus, erythema multiforme, intertrigo
Ulcerated Decubiti, herpes simplex, skin cancers, parasitic infections, syphilis (chancre), chancroid, vasculitis, stasis,
1
Not a morphologic class but included because it is one of the most common dermatologic presentations.
lichen simplex chronicus, tinea pedis/cruris/corporis, tinea versicolor, secondary syphilis, pityriasis rosea,
discoid lupus erythematosus, exfoliative dermatitis, drug eruption, actinic keratosis, Bowen disease
tinea, autoeczematization, dermatitis herpetiformis, miliaria crystallina, scabies, photosensitivity, acute
contact allergic dermatitis, drug eruption
dermatitis, drug eruption
erythema annulare centrifigum, erythema marginatum, erythema chronicum migrans
erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis
Purple-violet: lichen planus, drug eruptions, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma cutis, Sweet syndrome
Flesh-colored, umbilicated: molluscum contagiosum
Pearly: basal cell carcinoma, intradermal nevi
Small, red, inflammatory: acne, rosacea, miliaria rubra, candidiasis, scabies, folliculitis
Xerosis, scabies, pediculosis, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, bites, systemic causes, anogenital
pruritus
arterial disease, pyoderma gangrenosum
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Corticosteroids (Listed in Order of Increasing Potency)
Hydrocortisone
acetate
Cream 2.5%
Alclometasone
dipropionate
(Aclovate)
Desonide Cream 0.05%
Formulations,
Strengths
Cream 1%
Ointment 1%
Solution 1%
Ointment 2.5%
Cream 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Lotion 0.05%
Frequency of
Application
Twice daily Low Seborrheic dermatitis
As for 1% hydrocortisone Perhaps better for pruritus ani
Twice daily Low As for hydrocortisone More efficacious than hydrocortisone
Twice daily Low As for hydrocortisone
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
1
Pruritus ani
Intertrigo
For lesions on face or
body folds resistant to
hydrocortisone
Not the same as valerate or
hydrocortisone butyrate
Not for poison oak OTC lotion
(Aquanil HC), OTC solution
(Scalpicin)
Not clearly better than 1%
More expensive
Not OTC
Perhaps causes less atrophy
More efficacious than hydrocortisone
Can cause rosacea or atrophy
Not fluorinated
(continued)

DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS
CMDT 2025
103
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Clocortolone
(Cloderm)
Prednicarbate
(Dermatop)
Triamcinolone
acetonide
Cream 0.025%
Fluocinolone
acetonide
Solution 0.01% Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone
Mometasone
furoate
(Elocon)
Desoximetasone Cream 0.05%
Diflorasone
diacetate
Fluocinonide
(Lidex)
Betamethasone
dipropionate
(Diprolene)
Clobetasol
propionate
(Temovate)
Halobetasol
propionate
(Ultravate)
Flurandrenolide
(Cordran)
Formulations,
Strengths
Cream 0.1% Three times
Emollient cream
0.1%
Ointment 0.1%
Cream 0.1%
Ointment 0.1%
Lotion 0.1%
Ointment 0.025%
Cream 0.025%
Ointment 0.025%
Cream 0.1%
Ointment 0.1%
Lotion 0.1%
Cream 0.25%
Gel 0.05%
Ointment 0.25%
Cream 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Cream 0.05%
Gel 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Solution 0.05%
Cream 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Lotion 0.05%
Cream 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Lotion 0.05%
Cream 0.05%
Ointment 0.05%
Tape: $857.28/24″ ×
3″ roll
Lotion 0.05%
Frequency of
Application
daily
Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone May cause less atrophy
Twice daily Medium Eczema on extensor areas
Twice daily Medium As for 0.1% strength Possibly less efficacy and few
Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone
Once daily Medium As for triamcinolone Often used inappropriately on the
Twice daily High As for triamcinolone Comparable potency to fluocinonide
Twice daily High Nummular dermatitis
Twice daily High As for betamethasone
Twice daily Ultra-high For lesions resistant to
Twice daily Ultra-high As for betamethasone
Twice daily Ultra-high As for clobetasol Same restrictions as clobetasol
Every 12 hours Ultra-high Lichen simplex chronicus Tape version protects the skin and
1
(continued)
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
Medium Contact dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis
Used for psoriasis with tar
Seborrheic dermatitis and
psoriasis on scalp
Allergic contact dermatitis
Lichen simplex chronicus
Gel useful for poison oak
high-potency
corticosteroids
Lichen planus
Insect bites
dipropionate
Does not cross-react with other
corticosteroids chemically and can
be used in patients allergic to other
corticosteroids
No generic formulations
Preservative-free
Caution in body folds, face
Economical in 0.5-lb and 1-lb sizes
for treatment of large body surfaces
Economical as solution for scalp
advantages over 0.1% formulation
face or on children
Not fluorinated
Suggested for use when allergic
contact dermatitis to topical
corticosteroid is suspected;
ointment useful when allergic
contact dermatitis to propylene
glycol is suspected
Economical generics
Lidex cream can cause stinging on
eczema
Lidex emollient cream preferred
Economical generics available
Somewhat more potent than
diflorasone
Limited to 2 continuous weeks of use
Limited to 50 g or less per week
Cream may cause stinging; use
“emollient cream” formulation
Generic available
Cream does not cause stinging
Compatible with calcipotriene
(Dovonex)
prevents scratching
(continued)

104
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 6
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Nonsteroidal Anti-inammatory Agents Useful for Dermatitis (Listed Alphabetically)
Crisaborole
(Eucrisa)
Pimecrolimus3
(Elidel)
Ruxolitinib
(Opzelura)
Tacrolimus2
(Protopic)
Antibiotics (for Acne) (Listed Alphabetically)
Clindamycin
phosphate
Clindamycin/
Benzoyl
peroxide
(BenzaClin)
Dapsone Gel 5% Once daily N/A Mild papulopustular acne More expensive, well tolerated
Erythromycin Solution 2%
Erythromycin/
Benzoyl
peroxide
(Benzamycin)
Minocycline Foam: 4% Once daily N/A As for clindamycin No generic
Antibiotics (for Impetigo)
Mupirocin
(Bactroban)
Formulations,
Strengths
Ointment 2% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Cream 1% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Cream 1.5% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Ointment 0.1%
Ointment 0.03%
Solution 1%
Gel 1%
Lotion 1%
Pledget 1%
Gel Twice daily N/A As for benzamycin No generic
Gel 2%
Pledget 2%
Gel Twice daily N/A As for clindamycin
Ointment 2%
Cream 2%
Frequency of
Application
Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing atrophy
Twice daily N/A Mild papular acne Lotion is less drying than solution,
Twice daily N/A As for clindamycin Many different manufacturers
Three times
daily
1
(continued)
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
atrophy or striae
May sting or burn on initial
application
atrophy or striae
atrophy or striae
Many potential systemic side effects
including malignancy, infection
and cardiovascular
or striae
Burns in ≥ 40% of patients with
eczema
May cause flushing with ingestion of
alcohol
gel, or pledgets for patients with
sensitive skin
Recommend use with benzoyl
peroxide to avoid antibiotic
resistance from monotherapy
More effective than either agent
alone
Recommend use with benzoyl
peroxide to avoid antibiotic resistance from monotherapy
Economical
Recommend use with benzoyl perox-
ide to avoid antibiotic resistance
from monotherapy
Can help treat comedonal
acne
N/A Impetigo, folliculitis Because of cost, use limited to tiny
No generic
More expensive
More effective than other topical
antibiotics
Main jar requires refrigeration
More expensive
May cause skin yellowing (temporary,
washes off)
areas of impetigo
Used in the nose twice daily for 5 days
to reduce staphylococcal carriage
(continued)

DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
1
(continued)
CMDT 2025
105
Agent
Retapamulin
(Altabax)
Ozenoxacin
(Ozanex)
Antifungals: Imidazoles (Listed Alphabetically)
Clotrimazole Cream 1%: OTC
Econazole
(Spectazole)
Ketoconazole
(Nizoral)
Miconazole Cream 2%: OTC Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole As for clotrimazole
Oxiconazole
(Oxistat)
Sertaconazole
(Ertaczo)
Sulconazole
(Exelderm)
Other Antifungals (Listed Alphabetically)
Butenafine
(Mentax)
Ciclopirox
(Loprox)
(Penlac)
Efinaconazole
(Jublia)
Naftifine (Naftin) Cream 1%
Tavaborole
(Kerydin)
Terbinafine
(Lamisil)
Antipruritics (Listed Alphabetically)
Camphor/
menthol
(Sarna)
Capsaicin
(various)
Doxepin
(Zonalon)
Formulations,
Strengths
Ointment 1% Twice daily N/A Impetigo For Staphylococcus aureus or
Cream 1% Twice daily
Solution 1%
Cream 1% Once daily N/A As for clotrimazole Somewhat more effective than
Cream 2% g Once daily N/A As for clotrimazole Somewhat more effective than
Cream 1%
Lotion 1%
Cream 2% Twice daily N/A Refractory tinea pedis By prescription
Cream 1%
Solution 1%
Cream 1%: OTC Once daily N/A Dermatophytes Fast response; high cure rate;
Cream 0.77%
Lotion 0.77%
Solution 8%
Solution 10% Once daily for
Gel 1%
Solution 5% Once daily for
Cream 1%: OTC Once daily N/A Dermatophytes Fast clinical response
Lotion 0.5%/0.5% Two to three
Cream 0.025%
Cream 0.075%
Cream 5% Four times daily N/A Topical antipruritic, best
Frequency of
Application
(5 days)
Twice daily N/A Dermatophyte and
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole No generic
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole No generic
48 weeks
Once daily N/A Dermatophytes No generic
48 weeks
times daily
Three to four
times daily
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
Streptococcus pyogenes infection
Typically reserved for mupirocin-
resistant infections
N/A Impetigo Topical fluoroquinolone
Candida infections
N/A Onychomycosis No generic; more effective than
N/A Onychomycosis No generic available
N/A Mild eczema, xerosis, mild
contact dermatitis
N/A Topical antipruritic, best
used for neuropathic
itching
used in combination
with appropriate
topical corticosteroid
to enhance efficacy
Activity against MRSA
Available OTC
Inexpensive generic cream available
clotrimazole and miconazole
clotrimazole and miconazole
More expensive
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
expensive
Available OTC
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
ciclopirox for nail disease
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
OTC
Burning/stinging with initial
application that subsides with
consistent ongoing use
Can cause sedation
(continued)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
