Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2611_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
60 Мб
Скачать
96
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
medicine, or psychiatry followed by a fellowship in pain management to learn medication management and inter­ventional techniques for acute, chronic, and cancer pain. Interventional pain management modalities performed by pain management specialists involve neuromodulation of specific targets to alleviate pain. The procedures they per­form include percutaneous needle injection of local anes­thetics or corticosteroids, radiofrequency (thermal) lesioning, cryotherapy, chemical neurolysis, or surgical implantation of intrathecal medication delivery pump sys­tems or neurostimulation devices. While invasive proce-
dures carry their own inherent risks such as bleeding or infection, they can drastically reduce or even obviate the need for conventional pharmacologic therapies that may have side effects or be burdensome to the individual.
For some patients, a nerve block, such as a celiac plexus block for pain from pancreatic cancer, can provide substan­tial relief. Intrathecal pumps may be most useful for patients with severe pain responsive to opioids but who experience intolerable side effects from systemic medica­tions (eg, sedation, urinary retention, constipation). In the palliative care setting, these pumps are appropriate when life expectancy is long enough to justify the discomfort and cost of surgical implantation.
Clinicians do not need to know all the details of inter­ventional pain procedures but should consider referring their patients to pain management specialists if standard treatments are inadequate or associated with intolerable side effects. For example, a common question is whether prolonged opioid therapy with its inherent risks is better than an injection or an implanted device. Beyond knowing the benefits and risks, fiscal considerations may be key.
Table 5–10 and Table 5–11 list the procedures and the agents typically used in interventional pain modalities.
Table 5–10. Interventional sites and techniques for
chronic pain by anatomic location. (Listed in alphabetical order within general location.)
Anatomic sites for neurostimulation
Dorsal column stimulation (spinal cord stimulation) Dorsal root ganglion stimulation Peripheral nerve or field stimulation
Joints
Intra-articular injections Joint denervation procedures
Neuraxial blockage (block in the CNS)
Noncontinuous Epidural (caudal, lumbar, thoracic, cervical; interlaminar vs
transforaminal) Intrathecal Continuous neuraxial drug delivery Epidural (tunneled catheter, port) Intrathecal (implanted intrathecal pump)
Paraneuraxial (planar blockade)
Paravertebral (intercostal) Pectoralis and serratus anterior Transversus abdominis plane/quadratus lumborum
Peripheral nerve (perineural blockade)
Brachial plexus and branches Lumbar plexus and branches
Sympathetic ganglion
Celiac plexus Cervical sympathetic blockade (stellate ganglion) Ganglion impar Gasserian ganglion Lumbar sympathetic blockade Sphenopalatine ganglion Superior hypogastric plexus
Krames E, Poree L et al. Implementing the SAFE Principles for
the development of pain medicine therapeutic algorithms that include neuromodulation techniques. Neuromodulation. 2009;12:104. [PMID: 22151283]
Krames ES … Poree L et al. Using the SAFE principles when
evaluating electrical stimulation therapies for the pain of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2011;14:299. [PMID: 21992423]
Poree L et al. Spinal cord stimulation as treatment for complex
regional pain syndrome should be considered earlier than last resort therapy. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:125. [PMID: 23441988]
INTRATHECAL DRUG DELIVERY
A. Indications
Intrathecal drug delivery therapy is indicated for patients with both malignant and nonmalignant pain and has been shown to be effective, cost-effective, and safe. It is generally accepted that intrathecal opioids have a 100- to 300-fold efficacy compared with oral opioids; therefore, the best
candidates may be patients with good analgesic benefit from opioids but burdensome side effects. Common indications
include cancer pain, chronic low-back pain (in particular, post-laminectomy syndrome), complex regional pain
syndrome, and other causes of nociceptive or neuropathic pain. In a randomized controlled trial comparing intrathe­cal therapy with comprehensive medication management in cancer pain, intrathecal therapy was shown to provide superior analgesia with fewer side effects and longer life expectancy. Due to the cost of implanting the device as well as the recovery time needed from surgical implantation, it is recommended that patients have a life expectancy of at least 2–3 months.
B. Procedure
Intrathecal drug delivery systems consist of a pump with a drug reservoir, typically implanted in the abdominal wall, connected to a catheter that delivers medications into the intrathecal space. Initial percutaneous trialing is indicated for patients with noncancer or cancer pain; such percuta­neous trialing may consist of either epidural or intrathecal delivery of bolus or continuous medication to determine efficacy and side effect profiles of planned therapeutic agent(s). Some cancer patients may not undergo a trial to avoid delaying final implantation. Subsequent implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery system involves two inci­sions: one in the spine to accommodate the catheter and anchor, and another in the lower abdominal region to
PALLIATIVE CARE & PAIN MANAGEMENT
CMDT 2025
97
Table 5–11. Agents used1 in neuromodulatory
therapies. (Listed in alphabetic order within classes.)
Adjuvants
Clonidine Dexmedetomidine Others
Chemical neurolysis
Alcohol Phenol
Corticosteroids
Dexamethasone Methylprednisolone Triamcinolone
Neurostimulation
Various patterns, frequency, amplitude, pulse width
Opioids
Hydromorphone Fentanyl Morphine
Thermal neurolysis
Cryoanalgesia Radiofrequency ablation
Voltage-gated sodium channel blockade—local anesthetics
Bupivacaine Lidocaine Mepivacaine Ropivacaine
1
Injected or applied. List is not comprehensive but includes most commonly used agents.
create a pocket to hold the pump. The catheter is tunneled through the lower abdominal and flank subcutaneous tis­sues to connect to the pump. Both trial and implantation are typically performed under sedation with local anes­thetic infiltration; spinal anesthesia delivered from the pump itself can also be utilized for pump implantation. Some patients may require general anesthesia to tolerate the implantation procedure.
C. Medications Used
According to the Polyanalgesic Conference Consensus (PACC) guidelines for both malignant and nonmalignant pain, first-line intrathecal delivery medications include monotherapy with either morphine or ziconotide, a cal­cium channel inhibitor. However, the PACC guidelines also state that de facto practice includes combination therapy with opioids (eg, fentanyl, hydromorphone) and local anes­thetic (eg, bupivacaine) and may include other medications (eg, baclofen or clonidine). Respiratory depression and sedation are two of the most concerning side effects of many intrathecal medications. Side effects of morphine and fentanyl include nausea, edema, constipation, urinary retention, and pruritus but at a much lower rate than these same medications administered systemically. While ziconotide is FDA-approved, its use is limited due to side effects including myositis and polyarthralgias as well as
psychiatric and neurologic adverse effects (it is contraindi­cated in patients with preexisting psychosis).
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
The main advantage of intrathecal delivery therapy is targeted delivery of medication to the spinal cord with increased efficacy and diminished side effects compared with systemic analgesic medications. Intrathecal therapy has been found to be effective with decreased side effects and improved analgesia in 80% of cancer patients. The increased efficacy is due to the 100- to 300-fold increased potency of intrathecal medication compared with sys­temic medication. However, intrathecal therapy requires regular pump refills and may be complicated by rare adverse events including infections, catheter or pump malfunctions requiring surgical revision, or development of catheter tip granulomas, potentially leading to inade­quate analgesia or neurologic deficits. Pump batteries may last from 5 years to 10 years depending on usage. Fatali­ties surrounding intrathecal therapy have been linked to respiratory depression when high doses and high cervical catheters are used or when combined with high systemic doses of medications; patients must be monitored for respiratory depression or sedation when initiating or increasing intrathecal therapeutic agents. Some intrathe­cal pumps need to be emptied prior to MRI; due to the magnetic forces of the MRI, the entirety of the drug res­ervoir could inadvertently open. Therefore, it is critical that the type of pump is known prior to placing the patient and pump in an MRI machine. Additionally, anti­coagulants and NSAIDs need to be stopped prior to pump implantation and need to be held briefly after the implan­tation as well; this temporary cessation imposes the risk of potentially causing blood clots.
E. Alternatives
For patients with limited life expectancy, continuous epi­dural drug delivery via an external pump or subcutaneous port may be more appropriate. Systemic medications deliv­ered orally, intravenously, topically, or even by a subcutane­ous infusion (as in palliative care settings) are alternatives to intrathecal therapy.
Abd-Elsayed A et al. Intrathecal drug delivery for chronic pain
syndromes: a review of considerations in practice manage­ment. Pain Physician. 2020;23:E591. [PMID: 33185379]
De Andres J et al. Intrathecal drug delivery: advances and appli-
cations in the management of chronic pain patient. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022;3:900566. [PMID: 35782225]
Perruchoud C et al. Management of cancer-related pain with
intrathecal drug delivery: a systematic review and meta­analysis of clinical studies. Neuromodulation. 2022:S1094. [PMID: 35088743]
Sindt JE et al. Initiation of intrathecal drug delivery dramatically
reduces systemic opioid use in patients with advanced cancer. Neuromodulation. 2020;23:978. [PMID: 32459393]
Spiegel MA et al. Evaluation of an intrathecal drug delivery pro-
tocol leads to rapid reduction of systemic opioids in the oncological population. J Palliat Med. 2021;24:418. [PMID: 32640912]
98
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
SPINAL STIMULATION
A. Indications
Spinal stimulation targets neuropathic pain in the trunk and limbs, such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, and radiculopathy. There is also growing literature around its use for neuropathic pain associated with cancer.
B. Procedure
Neurostimulation devices consist of an implantable pulse generator typically placed in the flank or abdomen just under the skin and an array of electrical contacts on small cylindrical or paddle leads placed in the epidural space.
Neurostimulation devices transmit electrical pulses to the spinal cord or dorsal root ganglion to block pain transmis­sion. Paddle leads require neurosurgical implantation with
laminotomy (and general anesthesia), while percutaneous wire leads may be implanted under sedation. Patients undergo a 3- to 7-day trial during which the leads are attached to an external battery source and undergo pro­gramming with different pulse waveforms to assess thera­peutic efficacy prior to surgical implantation of permanent leads and implantable pulse generator.
C. Stimulation Parameters
Traditional neurostimulation resulted in paresthesias that were used to mask pain. It was presumed that these pares­thesias were the result of stimulation of the dorsal column axons. Recent studies have revealed that analgesia can be obtained independent of paresthesias by altering a variety of spinal cord stimulation parameters, including constant high-frequency stimulation and burst high-frequency stimulation. More recent double-blind, randomized, con­trolled trials have revealed that both functional status and pain scores could be significantly improved in spinal cord stimulation systems that adapt the output to the patient’s individual neural response in a closed loop fashion, thereby providing long-term improvement in pain relief, sleep, mood, disability, and opioid reduction. For more focal neuropathic pain conditions such as postoperative inguinal nerve injuries or thoracic postherpetic neuralgias, stimula­tion of the dorsal root ganglion can provide focal analgesia. These newer, more versatile systems deliver paresthesia­free analgesia with analgesic response rates that have steadily increased from about 50% with the traditional devices to about 80%. The newer devices also have greater longevity, and most are MRI compatible.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
Spinal cord stimulation is a reversible technology that may provide superior analgesic efficacy while eliminating the need for systemic medications. Literature suggests spinal cord stimulation is efficacious in 80–90% of well-selected patients, such as those with neuropathic low-back pain due to post-laminectomy syndrome. In fact, spinal cord stimu­lation has now advanced to a higher position in the
treatment continuum; it can be considered before using long-term moderate doses of systemic opioids. On the other hand, because it is a surgical procedure, it may be associated with complications, such as infection, lead migration, device malfunction, or neurologic deficits. While MRIs were contraindicated with some older sys­tems, most newer systems allow for limited MRI imaging. Batteries may require charging a few times a week but typi­cally do not require replacement for 5–10 years. Similar to intrathecal pumps, anticoagulants and NSAIDs need to be stopped prior to implantation of spinal cord stimulation devices because of the potential risks (eg, bleeding). The implanting surgeon, prescribing physician, and patient need to discuss the benefits and risks before proceeding. In addition, a psychological evaluation is typically performed prior to initiating therapy to rule out any severe untreated psychological comorbidities and assess expectation of treatment and appropriateness of implantation.
E. Alternatives
In addition to medication management for pain, two neu­romodulatory techniques may serve as alternatives to dor­sal horn and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Peripheral nerve stimulation is an established technology; it targets peripheral nerves using a similar system of a lead con­nected to a pulse generator. It may be most appropriate when there is a very specific neurologic target. Transcuta- neous electrical nerve stimulators (TENS) and systemic pharmacologic therapies are alternatives.
Deer TR et al. A systematic literature review of spine neuro-
stimulation therapies for the treatment of pain. Pain Med. 2020;21:1421. [PMID: 32034422]
Hofmeister M et al. Effectiveness of neurostimulation technolo-
gies for the management of chronic pain: a systematic review. Neuromodulation. 2020;23:150. [PMID: 31310417]
Kapural L … Poree L et al. Durable multimodal and holistic
response for physiologic closed-loop spinal cord stimulation supported by objective evidence from the EVOKE double­blind randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023:rapm-2023-104639. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 37491149]
Mekhail N … Poree L et al; EVOKE Study Group. Durability of
clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain: a secondary analysis of the Evoke randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:251. Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2022;79:420. [PMID: 35156999]
Mekhail NA … Poree L et al; EVOKE Study Group. ECAP-con-
trolled closed-loop versus open-loop SCS for the treatment of chronic pain: 36-month results of the EVOKE blinded ran­domized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023:rapm­2023-104751. [Epub ahead of print] [PMID: 37640452]
CELIAC PLEXUS BLOCK & NEUROLYSIS
A. Indications
A celiac plexus block refers to injection of a long-acting anes­thetic (eg, bupivacaine) with or without a corticosteroid (eg, methylprednisolone); with steroids, the block can provide
PALLIATIVE CARE & PAIN MANAGEMENT
CMDT 2025
99
relief for a few weeks to months. Celiac plexus neurolysis involves injection of a neurolytic agent (eg, alcohol or phenol); it may provide pain relief more consistently for 2–6 months. The most common indication is pancreatic cancer pain, but it can be used for pain from other malignancies (eg, stomach, liver, spleen, kidney, and GI tract) or from chronic pancreatitis. Multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown superiority of celiac plexus neurolysis to medication management for pancreatic cancer, but evidence of its efficacy for chronic pancreatitis is more mixed.
B. Procedure
The most common approach is a percutaneous posterior approach under fluoroscopy guidance, with bilateral nee­dles targeted to the celiac plexus at the level of T12–L1. Alternatively, ultrasound, CT, or endoscopic guidance can be used. Minimal sedation is required for the percutaneous approaches, while heavy sedation or general anesthesia may be required for endoscopic guidance.
C. Medications Used
Chemical neurolysis with alcohol or phenol is used to extend the duration of the analgesia to 2 or more months compared to a block with local anesthetic (eg, bupivacaine) and corti­costeroid (eg, methylprednisolone), which produces an anal­gesic duration of weeks to months. For chemical neurolysis,
ethanol is used most often because it does not require compounding, and importantly has a lower chance of per­manent neurologic damage compared with phenol; how­ever, it is more painful on injection.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
The primary advantage is improved analgesia without need for systemic medications and their untoward effects. Neuro­lytic celiac plexus blockade is effective in 70–80% of patients. Common side effects of celiac plexus interventions include transient hypotension and transient diarrhea. Transient or permanent spinal cord damage is rare (0–0.2%) with local anesthetic, but inadvertent peripheral nerve injury is increased with the use of alcohol or phenol.
E. Alternatives
Standard pain management is with oral or transdermal systemic analgesic (eg, opioid) medication. Intrathecal therapy also is an alternative, especially for cancer pain.
resulting from central or neuroforaminal stenosis in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbosacral region. Both central and neuroforaminal stenosis may be caused by degenerative disk disease, disk herniation, or facet arthropathy. Epidural corticosteroid injections are relatively safe and are appro­priate after conservative measures, such as physical therapy and analgesic medications, have been tried and found unsuccessful.
B. Procedure
Fluoroscopy is typically used to assist with visualizing the bony landmarks; either an interlaminar or a transforaminal approach can be used. Interlaminar access is obtained by placing a needle between the lamina of adjacent vertebral levels, whereas transforaminal access is obtained by insert­ing a needle through the neuroforamen to access the epi­dural space. These needle insertion procedures can be performed with topical local anesthetic or with minimal sedation.
C. Medications Used
Typically, a particulate corticosteroid such as methylpred­nisolone is used alone or in combination with a local anes­thetic. For the transforaminal approach, where inadvertent vascular access is more of a concern, a nonparticulate cor­ticosteroid such as dexamethasone may be preferred.
D. Advantages and Disadvantages
Epidural corticosteroid injections are advantageous for patients who have not responded to conservative therapy, are not surgical candidates, or do not want surgery. The best evidence of the effectiveness of epidural corticoste­roid injections is the short-term improvement of radicu­lopathy in both the lumbar and cervical regions. In a Cochrane analysis, side effects were noted in 10–24% of surgical cases but no side effects were reported for any conservative treatments. Disadvantages include possible postdural puncture headache, transient weakness, and, rarely, permanent neurologic deficits. Patients who are receiving systemic anticoagulation may need to hold their anticoagulants before receiving corticosteroid injections, which could increase their risk of cardiovascular events; these cases should be discussed with the clinician manag­ing the anticoagulation prior to performing any epidural corticosteroid injections.
Lau J et al. Interventional anesthesia and palliative care collabo-
ration to manage cancer pain: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67:235. [PMID: 31571119]
Urits I et al. A comprehensive review of the celiac plexus block
for the management of chronic abdominal pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24:42. [PMID: 32529305]
EPIDURAL CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION
A. Indications
Epidural corticosteroid injections are indicated for patients with chronic neck pain, low-back pain, and radicular pain
E. Alternatives
Alternatives include conservative therapy, such as oral analgesic medication management, physical therapy, pain psychology, acupuncture, and surgery.
Verheijen EJA et al. Epidural steroid compared to placebo injec-
tion in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:3255. [PMID: 33974132]
Yang S et al. Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treat-
ment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e21283. [PMID: 32791709]
100
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 5
» When to Refer
Patients should be referred to pain management specialists if they have:
• Pain that does not respond to low-dose systemic opi­oids at typical doses or the opioids cause major adverse effects at typical doses.
• Pain that cannot be controlled expeditiously or safely by other clinicians.
• Neuropathic pain that does not respond to first-line treatments.
• Complex medication management that requires high dose of medications, especially long-acting opioids such as buprenorphine or methadone.
• Severe pain from malignancy, including primary dis­ease (eg, pancreatic cancer) or metastatic disease (eg, bony metastases).
» When to Admit
• Severe exacerbation of pain not responsive to previous stable oral opioids given around-the-clock plus break­through doses.
• Pain that is so severe that it cannot be controlled at home.
• Uncontrollable side effects from opioids, including nau­sea, vomiting, myoclonus, and altered mental status.
• Need for a surgical procedure, such as implantation of an intrathecal drug delivery pump or neurostimulation device.

Dermatologic Disorders

Nathan W. Rojek, MD
Scott Worswick, MD
Kanade Shinkai, MD, PhD
Lindy P. Fox, MD
CMDT 2025
6
101
Dermatologic diseases are diagnosed by the types of lesions they cause. Identify the morphology of the lesion(s) to establish a differential diagnosis (Table 6–1), and obtain the elements of the history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory and histopathologic tests to confirm the diagnosis. Specific clinical situations, such as an immu­nocompromised or critically ill patients, lead to different diagnostic considerations.
PRINCIPLES OF DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY
» Frequently Used Treatment Measures
A. Bathing
Soap should be used only in the axillae and groin and on the feet by persons with dry or inflamed skin. Soaking in water for 10–15 minutes before applying topical corticoste­roids or emollient enhances their efficacy (Soak and Smear).
B. Topical Therapy
Nondermatologists should become familiar with a repre­sentative agent in each category for each indication (eg, topical corticosteroid, topical retinoid, etc).
1. Corticosteroids—Topical corticosteroid creams, lotions, ointments, gels, foams, and sprays are presented in Table 6–2. Topical corticosteroids are divided into classes based on potency. Agents within the same class are equiva­lent therapies; however, prices of topical corticosteroids vary dramatically. For a given agent, higher lipophilicity (greasiness) corresponds with increased potency such that for the same compound and strength an ointment formula­tion is more potent than a cream which is more potent than a lotion. The potency of a topical corticosteroid may be dramatically increased by occlusion (covering with a water-impermeable barrier) for at least 4 hours. Depending on the location of the skin condition, gloves, plastic wrap, moist pajamas covered by dry pajamas (wet wraps), or plastic occlusive suits can be used. Caution should be used in applying topical corticosteroids to areas of thin skin (face, genitals, skin folds). Topical corticosteroid use on the eyelids may result in glaucoma or cataracts. The clinician
may estimate the amount of topical corticosteroid needed by using the “rule of nines” (as in burn evaluation; see Figure 39–2). Approximately 20–30 g is needed to cover the entire body surface of an adult. Systemic absorption does occur with topical corticosteroids, but complications of systemic corticosteroids are rare.
2. Emollients for dry skin (“moisturizers”)—Dry skin is a result of abnormal function of the epidermis. Emollients restore the epidermis by promoting keratinocyte differen­tiation and by producing innate antimicrobials; some restore skin barrier lipids, including ceramides. Ointments and creams, rather than lotions, are the best moisturizers. Emollients are most effective when applied to wet skin. Plain petrolatum is allergen-free and can be used if allergic contact dermatitis to topical products is suspected.
The scaly appearance of dry skin may be improved by emollients with concomitant use of keratolytics including urea, lactic acid, or glycolic acid–containing products pro­vided no inflammation (erythema or pruritus) is present.
3. Drying agents for weepy dermatoses—If the skin is weepy from infection or inflammation, drying agents may be beneficial. The best drying agent is water applied as repeated compresses for 15–30 minutes, alone or with aluminum salts (Burow solution, Domeboro tablets).
4. Topical antipruritics—Lotions that contain 0.5% each of camphor and menthol (Sarna) or pramoxine hydrochlo­ride 1% (with or without 0.5% menthol, eg, Prax, PrameGel, Aveeno Anti-Itch lotion) are effective antipruritic agents. Hydrocortisone, 1% or 2.5%, may be incorporated for its anti-inflammatory effect (Pramosone cream, lotion, or ointment). Doxepin cream 5% reduces pruritus but may cause drowsiness. Pramoxine and doxepin are most effec­tive when applied with topical corticosteroids. Topical capsaicin and lidocaine can be effective in some forms of neuropathic itch.
C. Systemic Antipruritic Drugs
1. Antihistamines and antidepressants—H1-blockers are
the agents of choice for pruritus due to histamine, such as urticaria. Otherwise, they appear to benefit itchy patients only by their sedating effects. Hydroxyzine 25–50 mg
102
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 6
Table 6–1. Morphologic categorization of skin lesions and diseases.
Pigmented Freckle, lentigo, seborrheic keratosis, nevus, blue nevus, halo nevus, melanoma
Scaly Psoriasis, dermatitis (atopic, stasis, seborrheic, chronic allergic contact or irritant contact), xerosis (dry skin),
Vesicular Herpes simplex, varicella, herpes zoster, pompholyx (vesicular dermatitis of palms and soles), vesicular
Weepy or encrusted Impetigo, acute contact allergic dermatitis, any vesicular dermatitis
Pustular Acne vulgaris, acne rosacea, folliculitis, candidiasis, miliaria pustulosa, pustular psoriasis, any vesicular
Figurate (“shaped”) erythema Urticaria, erythema multiforme, erythema migrans, cellulitis, erysipelas, erysipeloid, arthropod bites,
Bullous Impetigo, blistering dactylitis, pemphigus, pemphigoid, porphyria cutanea tarda, drug eruptions,
Papular Hyperkeratotic: warts, corns, seborrheic keratoses
1
Pruritus
Nodular, cystic Erythema nodosum, furuncle, cystic acne, follicular (epidermal) inclusion cyst, metastatic tumor to skin
Photodermatitis Drug eruption, polymorphic light eruption, lupus erythematosus
Morbilliform Drug eruption, viral infection, secondary syphilis
Erosive Any vesicular dermatitis, impetigo, aphthae, lichen planus, erythema multiforme, intertrigo
Ulcerated Decubiti, herpes simplex, skin cancers, parasitic infections, syphilis (chancre), chancroid, vasculitis, stasis,
1
Not a morphologic class but included because it is one of the most common dermatologic presentations.
lichen simplex chronicus, tinea pedis/cruris/corporis, tinea versicolor, secondary syphilis, pityriasis rosea, discoid lupus erythematosus, exfoliative dermatitis, drug eruption, actinic keratosis, Bowen disease
tinea, autoeczematization, dermatitis herpetiformis, miliaria crystallina, scabies, photosensitivity, acute contact allergic dermatitis, drug eruption
dermatitis, drug eruption
erythema annulare centrifigum, erythema marginatum, erythema chronicum migrans
erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis
Purple-violet: lichen planus, drug eruptions, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma cutis, Sweet syndrome Flesh-colored, umbilicated: molluscum contagiosum Pearly: basal cell carcinoma, intradermal nevi Small, red, inflammatory: acne, rosacea, miliaria rubra, candidiasis, scabies, folliculitis
Xerosis, scabies, pediculosis, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, bites, systemic causes, anogenital
pruritus
arterial disease, pyoderma gangrenosum
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Corticosteroids (Listed in Order of Increasing Potency)
Hydrocortisone
acetate
Cream 2.5%
Alclometasone
dipropionate (Aclovate)
Desonide Cream 0.05%
Formulations,
Strengths
Cream 1% Ointment 1% Solution 1%
Ointment 2.5%
Cream 0.05% Ointment 0.05%
Ointment 0.05% Lotion 0.05%
Frequency of
Application
Twice daily Low Seborrheic dermatitis
As for 1% hydrocortisone Perhaps better for pruritus ani
Twice daily Low As for hydrocortisone More efficacious than hydrocortisone
Twice daily Low As for hydrocortisone
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
1
Pruritus ani Intertrigo
For lesions on face or
body folds resistant to hydrocortisone
Not the same as valerate or
hydrocortisone butyrate
Not for poison oak OTC lotion
(Aquanil HC), OTC solution (Scalpicin)
Not clearly better than 1% More expensive Not OTC
Perhaps causes less atrophy
More efficacious than hydrocortisone Can cause rosacea or atrophy Not fluorinated
(continued)
DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS
CMDT 2025
103
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Clocortolone
(Cloderm)
Prednicarbate
(Dermatop)
Triamcinolone
acetonide
Cream 0.025%
Fluocinolone
acetonide
Solution 0.01% Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone
Mometasone
furoate (Elocon)
Desoximetasone Cream 0.05%
Diflorasone
diacetate
Fluocinonide
(Lidex)
Betamethasone
dipropionate (Diprolene)
Clobetasol
propionate (Temovate)
Halobetasol
propionate (Ultravate)
Flurandrenolide
(Cordran)
Formulations,
Strengths
Cream 0.1% Three times
Emollient cream
0.1%
Ointment 0.1%
Cream 0.1% Ointment 0.1% Lotion 0.1%
Ointment 0.025%
Cream 0.025% Ointment 0.025%
Cream 0.1% Ointment 0.1% Lotion 0.1%
Cream 0.25% Gel 0.05% Ointment 0.25%
Cream 0.05% Ointment 0.05%
Cream 0.05% Gel 0.05% Ointment 0.05% Solution 0.05%
Cream 0.05% Ointment 0.05% Lotion 0.05%
Cream 0.05% Ointment 0.05% Lotion 0.05%
Cream 0.05% Ointment 0.05%
Tape: $857.28/24 ×
3 roll
Lotion 0.05%
Frequency of
Application
daily
Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone May cause less atrophy
Twice daily Medium Eczema on extensor areas
Twice daily Medium As for 0.1% strength Possibly less efficacy and few
Twice daily Medium As for triamcinolone
Once daily Medium As for triamcinolone Often used inappropriately on the
Twice daily High As for triamcinolone Comparable potency to fluocinonide
Twice daily High Nummular dermatitis
Twice daily High As for betamethasone
Twice daily Ultra-high For lesions resistant to
Twice daily Ultra-high As for betamethasone
Twice daily Ultra-high As for clobetasol Same restrictions as clobetasol
Every 12 hours Ultra-high Lichen simplex chronicus Tape version protects the skin and
1
(continued)
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
Medium Contact dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis
Used for psoriasis with tar Seborrheic dermatitis and
psoriasis on scalp
Allergic contact dermatitis Lichen simplex chronicus
Gel useful for poison oak
high-potency
corticosteroids
Lichen planus Insect bites
dipropionate
Does not cross-react with other
corticosteroids chemically and can be used in patients allergic to other corticosteroids
No generic formulations Preservative-free
Caution in body folds, face Economical in 0.5-lb and 1-lb sizes
for treatment of large body surfaces
Economical as solution for scalp
advantages over 0.1% formulation
face or on children
Not fluorinated
Suggested for use when allergic
contact dermatitis to topical corticosteroid is suspected; ointment useful when allergic contact dermatitis to propylene glycol is suspected
Economical generics Lidex cream can cause stinging on
eczema
Lidex emollient cream preferred
Economical generics available
Somewhat more potent than
diflorasone Limited to 2 continuous weeks of use Limited to 50 g or less per week Cream may cause stinging; use
“emollient cream” formulation Generic available
Cream does not cause stinging Compatible with calcipotriene
(Dovonex)
prevents scratching
(continued)
104
CMDT 2025
CHAPTER 6
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
Agent
Nonsteroidal Anti-inammatory Agents Useful for Dermatitis (Listed Alphabetically)
Crisaborole
(Eucrisa)
Pimecrolimus3
(Elidel)
Ruxolitinib
(Opzelura)
Tacrolimus2
(Protopic)
Antibiotics (for Acne) (Listed Alphabetically)
Clindamycin
phosphate
Clindamycin/
Benzoyl peroxide (BenzaClin)
Dapsone Gel 5% Once daily N/A Mild papulopustular acne More expensive, well tolerated
Erythromycin Solution 2%
Erythromycin/
Benzoyl peroxide (Benzamycin)
Minocycline Foam: 4% Once daily N/A As for clindamycin No generic
Antibiotics (for Impetigo)
Mupirocin
(Bactroban)
Formulations,
Strengths
Ointment 2% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Cream 1% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Cream 1.5% Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing
Ointment 0.1% Ointment 0.03%
Solution 1% Gel 1% Lotion 1% Pledget 1%
Gel Twice daily N/A As for benzamycin No generic
Gel 2% Pledget 2%
Gel Twice daily N/A As for clindamycin
Ointment 2% Cream 2%
Frequency of
Application
Twice daily N/A Atopic dermatitis Steroid substitute not causing atrophy
Twice daily N/A Mild papular acne Lotion is less drying than solution,
Twice daily N/A As for clindamycin Many different manufacturers
Three times
daily
1
(continued)
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
atrophy or striae
May sting or burn on initial
application
atrophy or striae
atrophy or striae
Many potential systemic side effects
including malignancy, infection and cardiovascular
or striae
Burns in ≥ 40% of patients with
eczema
May cause flushing with ingestion of
alcohol
gel, or pledgets for patients with sensitive skin
Recommend use with benzoyl
peroxide to avoid antibiotic resistance from monotherapy
More effective than either agent
alone
Recommend use with benzoyl
peroxide to avoid antibiotic resis­tance from monotherapy
Economical Recommend use with benzoyl perox-
ide to avoid antibiotic resistance from monotherapy
Can help treat comedonal
acne
N/A Impetigo, folliculitis Because of cost, use limited to tiny
No generic More expensive More effective than other topical
antibiotics
Main jar requires refrigeration
More expensive May cause skin yellowing (temporary,
washes off)
areas of impetigo
Used in the nose twice daily for 5 days
to reduce staphylococcal carriage
(continued)
DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS
Table 6–2. Useful topical dermatologic therapeutic agents.
1
(continued)
CMDT 2025
105
Agent
Retapamulin
(Altabax)
Ozenoxacin
(Ozanex)
Antifungals: Imidazoles (Listed Alphabetically)
Clotrimazole Cream 1%: OTC
Econazole
(Spectazole)
Ketoconazole
(Nizoral)
Miconazole Cream 2%: OTC Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole As for clotrimazole
Oxiconazole
(Oxistat)
Sertaconazole
(Ertaczo)
Sulconazole
(Exelderm)
Other Antifungals (Listed Alphabetically)
Butenafine
(Mentax)
Ciclopirox
(Loprox) (Penlac)
Efinaconazole
(Jublia)
Naftifine (Naftin) Cream 1%
Tavaborole
(Kerydin)
Terbinafine
(Lamisil)
Antipruritics (Listed Alphabetically)
Camphor/
menthol (Sarna)
Capsaicin
(various)
Doxepin
(Zonalon)
Formulations,
Strengths
Ointment 1% Twice daily N/A Impetigo For Staphylococcus aureus or
Cream 1% Twice daily
Solution 1%
Cream 1% Once daily N/A As for clotrimazole Somewhat more effective than
Cream 2% g Once daily N/A As for clotrimazole Somewhat more effective than
Cream 1% Lotion 1%
Cream 2% Twice daily N/A Refractory tinea pedis By prescription
Cream 1% Solution 1%
Cream 1%: OTC Once daily N/A Dermatophytes Fast response; high cure rate;
Cream 0.77% Lotion 0.77% Solution 8%
Solution 10% Once daily for
Gel 1%
Solution 5% Once daily for
Cream 1%: OTC Once daily N/A Dermatophytes Fast clinical response
Lotion 0.5%/0.5% Two to three
Cream 0.025% Cream 0.075%
Cream 5% Four times daily N/A Topical antipruritic, best
Frequency of
Application
(5 days)
Twice daily N/A Dermatophyte and
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole No generic
Twice daily N/A As for clotrimazole No generic
48 weeks
Once daily N/A Dermatophytes No generic
48 weeks
times daily
Three to four
times daily
Potency
Class Common Indications Comments
Streptococcus pyogenes infection Typically reserved for mupirocin-
resistant infections
N/A Impetigo Topical fluoroquinolone
Candida infections
N/A Onychomycosis No generic; more effective than
N/A Onychomycosis No generic available
N/A Mild eczema, xerosis, mild
contact dermatitis
N/A Topical antipruritic, best
used for neuropathic itching
used in combination with appropriate topical corticosteroid to enhance efficacy
Activity against MRSA
Available OTC Inexpensive generic cream available
clotrimazole and miconazole
clotrimazole and miconazole
More expensive
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
expensive Available OTC
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
ciclopirox for nail disease
Somewhat more effective than
clotrimazole and miconazole
OTC
Burning/stinging with initial
application that subsides with
consistent ongoing use
Can cause sedation
(continued)