Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_633_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Preface for First Edition (1988)
- •Preface for Second Edition (1998)
- •Preface for Third Edition (2003)
- •Preface for Fourth Edition (2013)
- •Contents
- •The Anatomical Era
- •1: General Introduction and History of Hernia Surgery
- •Ancient and Renaissance Hernia Surgery
- •The Middle Ages (AD500–AD1500)
- •The Era of Antisepsis and Asepsis
- •The Dawn of Anaesthesia
- •The Technological Era
- •The Extraperitoneal: Preperitoneal Approach to the Groin
- •Two Europeans: Lytle and Fruchaud
- •Inguinal Hernias in Soldiers in Georgian England
- •A Royal Rupture
- •Winston Churchill’s Hernia Repair
- •Tension-Free Hernia Repair
- •Mesh Technology (See Chap. 20)
- •Laparoscopic Repair
- •Incisional Hernia Repair
- •Simple Laparoplasty: Suturing
- •Organic Auto- or Heteroplasty: Grafting
- •Alloplasty: The Use of Prosthetics
- •Chronology of Hernia Surgery
- •References
- •2: Essential Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall
- •External Anatomy: Surface Markings and Surface Features
- •Skin
- •The Subcutaneous Layer
- •Musculoaponeurotic Plane
- •The Rectus Abdominis Muscle
- •The External Oblique Muscle
- •The Internal Oblique Muscle
- •The Transversus Abdominis Muscle
- •The Conjoint Tendon
- •The Linea Alba and the Rectus Sheath
- •Function of the Anterior Abdominal Wall
- •The Fascia Transversalis: The Space of Bogros
- •The Peritoneum: The View from Within
- •The Umbilicus
- •The Spermatic Cord
- •Comparative Anatomy
- •Radiological Anatomy
- •References
- •3: Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
- •Epidemiology
- •Demand for Groin Hernia Surgery in Adults
- •Inguinal Hernias in Adults
- •Femoral Hernias in Adults
- •Etiology of Primary Groin Hernia
- •Hernias “Under the Microscope”
- •A Curious Case of Recurrent Recurrence
- •Genetics in Pediatric Surgical Practice
- •The Genetics of Inheritance of the “Common” Indirect Inguinal Hernia
- •Intra-abdominal Diseases Causing Hernias
- •Inguinal Hernia and Appendectomy
- •Inguinal Hernia and Prostatic Surgery
- •Hernias Related to Trauma and Pelvic Fracture
- •Exertion and Groin Herniation
- •References
- •4: Incisional and Parastomal Hernia Prevention
- •Introduction
- •Mesh Prophylaxis Use at the Time of Midline Laparotomy Closure
- •Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Incisional Hernia Prophylaxis
- •Biologic Mesh IH Prophylaxis
- •Parastomal Hernia Prophylaxis
- •Parastomal Hernia Prophylaxis with Synthetic Mesh
- •PSH Prophylaxis with Biologic Mesh
- •References
- •5: The Application of Complex Systems Science to Healthcare and Hernia Disease
- •Introduction
- •Healthcare and the Application of Complex Systems Science
- •Developing a Program
- •Identifying Ideas for Improvement
- •Implementing Change, Examples of CQI
- •A Negative Anomaly: Minimizing Harm
- •Postoperative Pain Control
- •Eliminating Use of Drains in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
- •Summary
- •References
- •Local Anesthesia for Other Small Abdominal Wall Hernias
- •Postoperative Outcome of the Anesthetic Techniques
- •Postoperative Pain
- •Early Complications
- •Recovery
- •Recurrence
- •Patient Satisfaction
- •6: Anesthesia
- •Anesthesia for Groin Hernia Surgery
- •Background
- •Anesthetic Techniques
- •Preemptive Analgesia
- •General Anesthesia
- •Techniques
- •Regional Anesthesia
- •Techniques
- •Local Anesthesia
- •History
- •Local Anesthetic Agents
- •Local Anesthetic Techniques
- •Anatomy of the Groin Area
- •Inguinal Block Technique
- •Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
- •Complications of Local Anesthetics
- •Costs
- •References
- •7: Prostheses and Products for Hernioplasty
- •Introduction
- •Indications for Use of Prosthetic Materials
- •Prosthetic Materials: History
- •Absorbable Prosthetic Biomaterials
- •Biologic Products
- •Bovine Products
- •Cadaveric Products
- •Porcine Products
- •Hybrid Products
- •Flat Prosthetic Products
- •Miscellaneous Flat Products
- •Flat Mesh Devices for Inguinal Hernioplasty
- •Combination Flat Synthetic Prosthetics
- •Preformed Prosthetic Devices for Open Hernioplasty
- •Extraperitoneal Prosthetic Devices for Open Inguinal Hernioplasty
- •Pre-Shaped Products for Laparoscopic/Robotic Inguinal Hernioplasty
- •Prostheses for Incisional and Ventral Hernioplasty with an Absorbable Component
- •Combination Permanent Materials for Incisional and Ventral Hernioplasty
- •Stomal Hernia Prevention and Repair Products
- •Hiatal Hernia Repair Products
- •Fixation Devices
- •References
- •8: Progress in Synthetic Prosthetic Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Background on Hernia Mesh for Ventral Repair
- •Current Mesh Materials
- •New Research in Mesh Materials
- •Choosing the “Best” Mesh
- •Future of Hernia Mesh Materials
- •References
- •9: Logistics and Specialised Hernia Units
- •Introduction
- •Patient Pathway in a Hernia Centre
- •First Access in Hospital
- •Social Criteria
- •Medical Criteria
- •Surgical Criteria
- •Preoperative Screening and Selection
- •Day of Surgery
- •Operating Theatre
- •Post-operative Time and Discharge
- •Follow-Up
- •References
- •10: Outcomes Assessment and Registries
- •Introduction
- •Outcome
- •Complications
- •Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
- •Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements and Quality of Life Assessment
- •Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain
- •Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
- •Generic Quality of Life Scores Short-Form 36 (SF-36)
- •Carolina Comfort Scale™ (CCS™)
- •Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ) and Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (VHPQ)
- •EuraHS-Quality of Life Score (EuraHS-QoL)
- •Recurrence Rate
- •Registries
- •How Should We Evaluate and Register These Outcome Parameters?
- •Case-Control Studies
- •Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
- •Hernia Registries
- •Development of Registries in Europe
- •References
- •11: Diagnosis of a Lump in the Adult Groin
- •Inguinal Hernia: The Adolescent and the Adult
- •Femoral Hernia
- •Differential Diagnoses of Groin Bulges
- •Hydrocele
- •Vascular Disease
- •Lymphadenopathy
- •Tumors
- •Secondary Tumors
- •Genital Anomalies
- •Obturator Hernia
- •Rarities
- •Clinical Examination of a Swelling in the Groin
- •Inguinoscrotal Pain
- •Clinical Examination of Patients with Groin Pain
- •Investigations in Occult Hernia and Groin Pain
- •Herniography
- •Ultrasonography
- •Computed Tomography
- •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •Laparoscopy
- •Clinical Dilemmas
- •References
- •12: Anterior Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia in Adults
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Who Needs an Operation?
- •‘One Fits All’ or a Tailored Repair?
- •Recurrent Hernia
- •The High-Risk Anaesthetic
- •Preoperative Pain
- •Bilateral Hernia
- •Groin Hernia in Women
- •Consent for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Suture or Mesh Repair
- •Operative Steps
- •Principles of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Patient Positioning and Theatre Set-up
- •Antibiotic Use
- •Operative Steps
- •Incision and Access
- •The Dissection of the Canal
- •The Management of the Hernia Sac
- •Indirect
- •No Contents
- •Small Bowel and/or Omentum, with or Without Adhesions
- •Sliding Hernia
- •Direct
- •Combined Direct and Indirect
- •The Reconstruction
- •The Open Anterior Mesh Repair (Lichtenstein Tension-Free Hernioplasty)
- •Mesh Fixation
- •Suture Repairs
- •Shouldice Repair
- •Dissection of Fascia Transversalis
- •Repair of Fascia Transversalis
- •Reinforcement with the Conjoint Tendon
- •Marcy/Zimmermann Suture Repair
- •McVay Repair
- •Closure
- •External Oblique Aponeurosis
- •Subcutaneous Tissue and Skin Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •13: Preperitoneal Open Repair of Groin Hernias Using Prosthetic Reinforcement
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Classical Preperitoneal Methods
- •Operative Technique: Stoppa and Wantz
- •‘Small Incision’ Preperitoneal Methods
- •Operative Techniques of Small Incision Repairs
- •Anaesthesia
- •The Ugahary Operation
- •The Kugel Repair
- •Results
- •TREPP
- •Indications For a ‘Classical’ Open Preperitoneal Repair
- •Indications For a ‘Small Incision’ Open Preperitoneal Repair
- •Summary
- •References
- •14: Tissue Repairs for Inguinal Hernia
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Bassini Repair
- •Shouldice Repair
- •McVay Repair
- •Desarda Repair
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •Selecting a Tissue-Based Repair
- •References
- •15: Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Extraperitoneal Operation
- •Anesthesia
- •Position of the Patient on the Table
- •Trocars and Trocar Position
- •Laparoscope
- •Developing the Extraperitoneal Space
- •Dissection
- •Indirect Inguinal Hernias in Males
- •Indirect Inguinal Hernias in Females
- •Direct Inguinal Hernias
- •Femoral Hernias
- •Recurrent Hernias
- •Bilateral Hernias
- •Fixation of the Mesh
- •Conversion to Open Repair
- •Contraindications to Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair
- •Transabdominal Hernia Repair
- •Chronic Pain After Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
- •Results
- •Disadvantages of Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
- •References
- •16: Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Conditions
- •Technical Steps
- •Reduction of the Hernia Content
- •Evaluation of the Surface Anatomy
- •Peritoneal Incision and True Preperitoneal Dissection
- •Hernia Sac Reduction
- •Zone of Medial Dissection
- •Zone of Psoas Dissection
- •Zone of Lateral Dissection
- •Mesh Placement and Fixation
- •Re-peritonealization of the Mesh
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •17: Single Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Port Placement
- •The TriPort+ (Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany)
- •The SILS Port (Covidien, Norwalk, Connecticut, USA)
- •The GelPort Laparoscopic System (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA)
- •The Surgery and Specialized Techniques
- •Mesh Insertion
- •Wound Closure
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •18: Massive Inguino-scrotal Hernia
- •Introduction
- •Anatomic Considerations
- •Inguino-scrotal Hernia
- •Pathology of Massive Inguino-scrotal Hernia
- •Preoperative Preparations
- •Patient Positioning and Theatre Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Post-operative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •19: Management of Abdominal Wall Hernias, Sports Hernias, and Athletic Pubalgia
- •Background and Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Diagnostic Evaluation
- •Terminology
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Imaging
- •Pathophysiology
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Surgical Approaches
- •Rehabilitation
- •Summary
- •References
- •20: Femoral Hernia
- •Anatomy
- •Epidemiology
- •Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation
- •Incarceration and Strangulation
- •Management of Femoral Hernias
- •Treatment Approaches
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Laparoscopic Approach
- •Open Preperitoneal Approach
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •Femoral Approach
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •Inguinal Approach
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •21: Inguinal Hernias in Babies and Children
- •Introduction
- •A Brief History of Paediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Embryology
- •Anatomy
- •Aetiology
- •Incidence
- •Presentation, Diagnosis and Differentials
- •Management Options
- •Timing of Surgery
- •Metachronous Contralateral Inguinal Hernia (MCIH)
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Consent
- •Anaesthesia for Inguinal Hernia
- •The World Health Organization (WHO) Checklist
- •Operative Options
- •Operative Steps: Open Repair (Figs. 21.5 and 21.6)
- •Patient Position and Theatre Set-Up
- •Incision and Access
- •Key Steps
- •Closure
- •Alternative Open Approach: The High Scrotal ‘Bianchi’ Approach
- •Operative Steps: Laparoscopic
- •Patient Position and Theatre Set-Up
- •Incision and Access
- •Closure
- •Alternative Minimally Invasive Techniques
- •Post-operative Management
- •Post-operative Complications
- •Summary
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •22: Management of Adverse Events After Inguinal Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
- •Urinary Retention
- •Bleeding
- •Hematoma
- •Seroma
- •Testicular Complications
- •Infertility
- •Bowel Complications
- •Intraoperative Bowel Injury
- •Missed Enterotomy
- •Bowel Obstruction
- •Bladder Injury
- •Immediate Neuropathic Pain
- •Infection
- •Hernia Recurrence
- •References
- •23: Chronic Pain After Inguinal Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Prevention
- •Treatment
- •Non-operative Therapies
- •Operative Therapies
- •Preoperative Counseling
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Prevention
- •Treatment
- •Incision and Access
- •Prevention
- •Treatment
- •Operative Steps
- •Prevention
- •Treatment
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Prevention
- •Treatment
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •24: The Open Abdomen: Indications and Management
- •Introduction
- •Indications for the Open Abdomen
- •Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
- •Causes of IAH/ACS
- •Diagnosis of IAH/ACS
- •Treatment of IAH/ACS
- •Medical Management of IAH/ACS [15]
- •Decreasing the Intra-abdominal Volume
- •Improving Abdominal Wall Compliance
- •Treatment of Other Factors
- •Surgical Management of IAH/ACS
- •Management of the Open Abdomen
- •Intensive Care
- •Nutrition
- •Management of the Open Abdominal Wound
- •Temporary Abdominal Closure (TAC)
- •Summary
- •References
- •25: Open Repair
- •Introduction
- •Signs and Symptoms
- •Conservative Management
- •Preoperative Care
- •Obesity
- •Diabetic Control
- •Smoking
- •Prevention of Infection
- •Nutrition
- •Loss of Domain
- •Pneumoperitoneum As an Aid in Surgical Treatment of Giant Hernias
- •Botox Injection
- •Principles of Open Repair
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Tissue Repair vs. Mesh Repair
- •Position of Patient
- •The Incision
- •Removal of Overlying Redundant Tissue
- •Exposure
- •Managing the Peritoneal Sac
- •Contents of the Sac
- •Visceroreduction
- •Panniculectomy
- •The Choices of Technique in Open Prosthetic Repair
- •Onlay (Prefascial, Chevrel) Technique
- •Incision and Dissection
- •Use of Drains
- •Sublay Repairs
- •Retromuscular/Rives
- •Preperitoneal Repair
- •Open Intraperitoneal Prosthetic Mesh Repair
- •Postoperative Care
- •Management of Drains
- •References
- •26: Component Separation of Abdominal Wall Muscles
- •Introduction
- •Anterior Component Separation
- •Posterior Component Separation
- •References
- •27: Minimally Invasive Sublay Mesh Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias with the MILOS Technique (Mini or Less Open Sublay Repair)
- •MILOS Operation of Diastasis Recti
- •Discussion
- •References
- •28: Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Intraoperative Considerations
- •Patient Preparation and Positioning
- •Abdominal Entry
- •Instruments
- •Prosthetic Biomaterials
- •Placement of the Prosthesis
- •Immediate Postoperative Considerations
- •Late Postoperative Considerations
- •Hernioplasty of Infrequent Defects
- •Results
- •Obesity and LIVH
- •References
- •29: Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair with Closure of the Fascial Defect
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Upper Midline Defects
- •Lower Midline Defects
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •30: Robotic Incisional Hernia Repair
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •31: Component Separation: Robotic Approach
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Double-Dock Robotic TAR Technique
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Single-Dock Rives-Stoppa Retromuscular Technique for Epigastric and Suprapubic Hernias
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Initial Access and Port Placement
- •Operative Steps
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •32: Postpartum Divarication Navel-Sparing Treatment by Multidisciplinary Approach
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •33: Umbilical, Epigastric, and Spigelian Hernias
- •Introduction
- •Embryology
- •Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall
- •Spigelian Hernia
- •History
- •Current Literature
- •Epigastric Hernia
- •History
- •Literature
- •Umbilical Hernia
- •History
- •Umbilical Hernia and Cirrhosis
- •Current Literature
- •Presentation and Diagnosis of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Open Repair of Primary Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Laparoscopic Repair of Primary Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias
- •Patient Positioning and Theater Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Tips and Pitfalls
- •References
- •34: Parastomal Hernia
- •Incidence of Parastomal Hernias
- •Prevention of Parastomal Hernias
- •Principles of Surgical Management of Parastomal Hernias
- •Repairing Parastomal Hernias
- •Mesh Repair of Parastomal Hernias
- •Technique of Extraperitoneal Prosthetic Repair
- •The Sugarbaker Technique of Open IPOM Repair
- •Technique of Stoma Relocation
- •References
- •35: Laparoscopic and Robotic Repair of Parastomal Hernias
- •Introduction
- •Laparoscopic Technique
- •Results of Laparoscopic Technique
- •Robotic Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •Results
- •References
- •36: Lumbar Hernia
- •Anatomy
- •Clinical Features
- •The Operation
- •Laparoscopic/Robotic Repair
- •General Technique Comments
- •Repair of True Fascial Defects
- •Repair of “Denervation Hernias”
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •37: Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
- •Sciatic Hernia
- •Anatomy
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Treatment
- •Obturator Hernia
- •Anatomy
- •Clinical Presentation
- •Treatment
- •Perineal Hernia
- •Anatomy
- •Presentation
- •Treatment
- •Supravesical Hernia
- •References
- •38: Umbilical Hernia in Babies and Children
- •Introduction
- •The History of Umbilical Hernia Management
- •Epidemiology
- •Embryology and Development
- •Predisposing Factors
- •Natural Progression
- •Presentation and Diagnosis
- •Complications
- •Management Options
- •Incidental Finding of Umbilical Hernia
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Preoperative Reduction
- •Surgical Options for Umbilical Hernia
- •Consent
- •Anaesthesia for Umbilical Hernia
- •The World Health Organisation (WHO) Checklist
- •Patient Positioning and Theatre Setup
- •Incision and Access
- •Operative Steps
- •Open
- •Minimally Invasive Techniques for Umbilical Hernia Repair

478
M. Śmetański and K .A. LeBlanc
References
1. Gardner GP, Josephs LG, Rosca M, et al. The retroperitoneal
incision. An evaluation of postoperative flank bulge. Arch Surg.
1994;129:753–6.
2. LeBlanc KA. Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia
recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia
repair. Hernia. 2016;20(1):85–9.
3. Hoffman RS, Smink DS, Noone R, et al. Surgical repair of the
abdominal bulge: correction of a complication of the flank incision
for retroperitoneal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:5.
4. Adamson RJW. A case of bilateral hernia through Petit’s triangle
with two associated abnormalities. Br J Surg. 1958;46:88–9.
5. Myers RN, Shearburn EW. The problem of recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Clin N Am. 1973;53:555–8.
6. Watson LF. Hernia: anatomy, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and the operative and injection treatment. 2nd ed. London: Harry Kimpton; 1938.
7. Geis WP, Saletta JD. Lumbar hernia. In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE,
editors. Hernia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1989.
8. Stumpf M, Conze J, Prescher A, et al. The lateral incisional hernia:
anatomical considerations for a standardized retromuscular sublay
repair. Hernia. 2009;13:293–7.
9. Yavuz N, Ersoy YE, Demirkesen O, et al. Laparoscopic incisional
lumbar hernia repair. Hernia. 2009;13:281–6.
10. Kretschmer HL. Lumbar hernia of the kidney. J Urol. 1851;65:
944–8.
11. Esposito TJ, Fedorak I. Traumatic lumbar hernia. Case report and
review of the literature. J Trauma. 1994;37:123–6.
12. McCarthy MC, Lemmon GW. Traumatic lumbar hernia: a seat belt
injury. J Trauma. 1996;40:121–2.
13. Burt BM, Afifi HY, Wanz GE, et al. Traumatic lumbar hernia:
reports of cases and comprehensive review of the literature. J
Trauma. 2004;57:1361–70.
14. Bathla L, Davies E, Fitzgibbons RJ, et al. Timing of traumatic lumbar hernia repair: is delayed repair safe? Report of two cases review
of the literature. Hernia. 2011;15:205–9.
15. Chatterjee S, Nam R, Fleshner N, et al. Permanent flank bulge is a
consequence of flank incision for radical nephrectomy in one half
of patients. Urol Oncol. 2004;22:36–9.
16. Copeman WSC, Ackerman WL. Fibrositis of the back. Q J Med.
1944;13:37–40.
17. Faille RJ. Low back pain and lumbar fat herniation. Am Surg.
1978;44:359–61.
18. McCarthy MP. Obturator hernia of the urinary bladder. Urology.
1976;7:312–4.
19. Zhou X, Nve JO, Chen G. Lumbar hernia: clinical analysis of 11
cases. Hernia. 2004;8:260–3.
20. Solaini L, di Francesco F, Gourgiotis S, et al. A very simple technique to repair Grynfeltt-Lesshaft hernia. Hernia. 2010;14:439–41.
21. Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Sigmon L, et al. A novel tech-
2005;9:22–6.
22. Aird I. Companion in surgical studies. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill
Livingstone; 1957.
23. Akita K, Niga S, Yamato Y, Munata T, Sato T. Anatomic basis of
chronic groin pain with special reference to sports hernia. Surg
Radiol Anat. 1999;21:1–5.
24. Iannitti DA, Biffl WL. Laparoscopic repair of traumatic lumbar
hernia. Hernia. 2007;11:537–40.
25. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ, et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal repair of lumbar incisional hernias: a combined suture
‘double-mesh’ technique. Hernia. 2008;12:27–31.
26. Moreno-Egea A, Torralba-Martinez JA, Morales G, Fernández T,
Girela E, Aguayo-Albasini JL. Open vs laparoscopic repair of secondary lumbar hernias. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:184–7.
27. Bittner R, Bingener-Casey J, Dietz U, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias
(International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part III. Surg Endosc.
2014;28:380–404.
28. Sun J, Chen X, Li J, Zhang Y, Dong F, Zheng M. Implementation
of the trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal (TAPE) technique in
laparoscopic lumbar hernia repair. BMC Surg. 2015;15:118.
29. Habib E. Retroperitoneoscopic tension-free repair of lumbar hernia. Hernia. 2003;7:150–2.
30. Salameh JR, Salloum EJ. Lumbar incisional hernias: diagnostic and
management dilemma. JSLS. 2004;8:391–4.
31. Zieren J, Menenakos C, Taymoorian K, et al. Flank hernia and bulging
after open nephrectomy: mesh repair by flank or median approach?
Report of a novel technique. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39:989–93.

Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
Michael S. Kavic, Suzanne M. Kavic, Mary K. Hanissee,
and Stephen M. Kavic
37
There are several large openings in the bony pelvic girdle,
including its floor that can allow for intestine or viscera to
pass through and develop a hernia. However, the near vertical walls of the pelvis mitigate against the development of
hernia—mitigate—but not completely deny hernia formation. Although rare, hernias of the deep pelvic structures can
occur and cause debilitating symptoms.
Unfortunately, physicians often ignore these symptoms
because hernias in the pelvic areas are difficult to see and to
palpate. For the most part, pelvic wall hernia is not even considered in females with vague abdominal or pelvic symptoms. Nonetheless, general surgeons need a thorough
knowledge of pelvic anatomy, particularly, potential hernia
sites in women, to avoid inadequate diagnostic workup and
examination. Patients, usually older female patients, suffer
the consequences of our inattention.
A good example of disease neglected by the general surgeons is chronic pelvic pain in females. Chronic pelvic pain
is a common problem in women accounting for 10–30% of
all gynecological visits. It is considered the principle indication for 20% of hysterectomies performed for benign disease
and approximately 40% of gynecological laparoscopies [1].
About 78,000 hysterectomies are performed each year in the
United States for chronic pelvic pain [2]. It has been estimated that 70% of female patients who have chronic pelvic
M.S. Kavic, MD (*)
Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth Health Center,
Youngstown, OH, USA
Northeast Ohio Medical University, College of Medicine,
Rootstown, OH, USA
e-mail: Mkavic@aol.com; mkavic@sls.org
S.M. Kavic, MD
Loyola University Medical Center 630-953- 6669,
Maywood, IL 60153, USA
M.K. Hanissee, MD
Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center,
Baltimore, MD, USA
S.M. Kavic, MD
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
pain have disease in the reproductive genital tract; however,
10% of patients with chronic pelvic pain had gastrointestinal
tract disorders, 8% had musculoskeletal neurologic disease,
7% had myofascial abnormalities, and 5% had urologic
causes of chronic pelvic pain [3]. Chronic pelvic pain can
have many etiologies, and the general surgeon must not shirk
from actively participating in the evaluation of these patients.
Chronic pelvic pain has three main dimensions: (1) duration, pelvic pain lasting 6 months or more; (2) anatomic, pain
in the pelvis defined by physical findings at laparoscopy; and
(3) affective/behavioral, pelvic pain accompanied by significant alterations in physical activity such as work, recreation,
and sex, as well as changes in mood related to the chronic
pain [3]. Most standard laboratory and imaging studies such
as complete blood count, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound,
and computed tomographic studies are often within normal
limits.
Frequently dismissed as “female trouble,” chronic pelvic
pain has resisted intensive efforts to determine its cause.
Chronic pelvic pain can have many etiologies, and a multidisciplinary approach is frequently necessary for proper
patient evaluation [4]. Nevertheless, chronic pelvic pain is a
real entity, and it is now appreciated that obscure, rare conditions such as sciatic, obturator, supravesical, and perineal
hernia may cause chronic pain in women. A case in point is
the seldom diagnosed sciatic hernia.
Sciatic Hernia
Sciatic hernia, one of the rarest of abdominal and pelvic wall
hernias, was first described by Verdier in 1753 [5, 6]. It is the
protrusion of peritoneal sac and content through the greater
or lesser sciatic foramen. The hernia may occur superior to
the piriformis muscle (suprapiriformis), inferior to the piriformis (infrapiriformis), or through the lesser sciatic notch
(subspinous) (Fig. 37.1). Known variously as sacrosciatic
hernia, ischiatic hernia, ischiocele, hernia incisurae ischiadicae, or gluteal hernia, the hernia sac may contain the ovary,
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
K.A. LeBlanc et al. (eds.), Management of Abdominal Hernias, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63251-3_37
479

480
Fig. 37.1 Sciatic hernia. The
hernia may occur superior to
the piriformis muscle
(suprapiriformis), inferior to
the piriformis
(infrapiriformis), or through
the lesser sciatic notch
(subspinous)
M.S. Kavic et al.
tube, or intestine. Entrapment of these organs may cause
chronic pelvic pain or bowel obstruction.
There were only 39 cases of sciatic hernia reported in the
world literature up to 1958 [5, 6]. However, in 1998, Miklos
and colleagues reported 20 cases of sciatic hernia diagnosed
in a series of 1100 female patients who had diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain. All of these cases had the
ipsilateral ovary alone or fallopian tube contained within the
hernia sac. If this incidence of sciatic hernia in patients who
required diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain
(1.8%) is carried over into the general population, sciatic
hernia cannot be as rare as previously thought [7].
Anatomy
The sacrospinous ligament converts the greater sciatic notch
into the greater sciatic foramen which is filled with the piriformis muscle. In addition to the piriformis muscle, the
greater sciatic foramen transmits the gluteal vessels and
nerves, internal pudendal vessels and nerve, and nerves to
the obturator internus and quadratus femoris muscles. Above
the piriformis muscle, the suprapiriformis area allows for
passage of the superior gluteal artery, vein, and nerve. Below
the piriformis muscle lies the infrapiriformis space which
transmits the inferior gluteal vessels, posterior femoral cutaneous nerve, nerve to the obturator internus, internal pudendal vessels and nerves, and sciatic nerve.
The lesser sciatic notch is transformed into a foramen by
the sacrospinous ligament superiorly and the sacrotuberous
ligament inferiorly. The lesser sciatic foramen transmits the
tendon of the obturator internus, its nerve, and the internal
pudendal vessels [5]. In females, the abdominal opening of a
sciatic hernia is posterior to the broad ligament. In males, the
opening lies in the lateral pelvis between the urinary bladder
and rectum. Hernias below the sacrotuberous ligament are
considered to be perineal hernias [8].
Clinical Presentation
Sciatic hernias are rarely noted on physical examination as the
large gluteal muscles cover and overlap the sciatic foramen. To
further complicate matters, openings in the sciatic foramen are
small, and many of these cases present with incarceration and
obstruction. Frequently, the diagnosis is only revealed at laparotomy. Even so, the pain of chronic sciatica may call attention
to the gluteal area where physical examination may suggest a
gradually increasing infragluteal bulge or a bulge that is more
pronounced on standing and can cause pain with sitting [9].
Compression of the sciatic nerve can cause muscle weakness
of the lower leg with pain radiating down the posterior thigh
made worse with dorsiflexion. Herniography can be helpful in
delineating a sciatic hernia; however, a computerized tomography (CT) scan is the initial diagnostic imaging of choice.
Treatment
Sciatic hernias have been repaired by a transabdominal or
transgluteal approach [10, 11]. A transabdominal approach
is usually recommended as these hernias are difficult to diagnose, and most surgeons are more comfortable performing
an exploration for possible bowel obstruction in an open
manner. Laparoscopic access, however, can offer satisfactory
visualization of a sciatic hernia [7] (Fig. 37.2).
After the abdomen has been opened or pneumoperitoneum established for laparoscopic access, a thorough intraabdominal examination is performed. The liver, gallbladder,
stomach, intestine, appendix, uterus, tubes, ovaries, and peri-

37 Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
Fig. 37.2 Laparoscopic view of a sciatic hernia
481
Fig. 37.4 Mesh repair of a sciatic hernia
Obturator Hernia
An obturator hernia is an abnormal protrusion of preperitoneal fat or intestine through the obturator canal. These hernias are rarely visualized and are usually not found
preoperatively unless a palpable bulge is noted on rectal or
bimanual pelvic examination [13, 14]. An obturator hernia
may contain a “pilot tag” of preperitoneal tissue, large or
small bowel, appendix, uterus, tube, or ovary [15]. Herniation
through the obturator canal is rare, occurring in 0.073% of
all hernias in one series [16]. Two broad groups of patients
have been described who most frequently suffer obturator
hernia [15–17]:
Fig. 37.3 Sciatic hernia sac reduction
toneal surfaces are examined [12]. The entire pelvis is
inspected for hernias, adhesions, and endometriosis.
If a sciatic hernia is found, its content is reduced. Dusky
bowel should be observed for 5–10 min to see that adequate
circulation is reestablished. Nonviable bowel should be
resected with primary anastomosis. If the bowel is viable, a
preperitoneal incision is made superior to the hernia defect
and the hernia sac reduced (Fig. 37.3). The sciatic foramen is
visualized and completely covered with nonabsorbable synthetic mesh. There should be a 2.5–3.0 cm overlap of the
hernia defect with mesh circumferentially. The mesh is
secured with endohernia tacks or fasteners to the obturator
internus fascia laterally and coccygeus medially (Fig. 37.4).
The area is reperitonealized by closing the peritoneal incision with intracorporeal suture, tacks, or fasteners. The laparoscopic trocar sites or abdominal incision is then closed in
the standard manner.
1. Elderly patients, usually women, with a history of chronic
disease, weight loss, increased intra-abdominal pressure,
and attenuation of the obturator membrane
2. Women of childbearing age
Anatomy
The obturator foramen is the largest bony foramen in the
human body (Fig. 37.5). It is roughly circular in shape and
shielded by the obturator membrane. The internal opening
of the obturator canal is about 1 cm diameter and sited in
the superior midsection of the obturator membrane. The
obturator canal itself is a fibro-osseous tunnel about 2–3 cm
in length whose roof is formed by the obturator sulcus of
the pubic bone and its floor by the internal and external
obturator muscles and their fascia. The obturator nerve,
artery, and vein pass through the obturator canal with the
nerve typically superior to the artery and vein (Fig. 37.6).
After passing through the obturator canal, the obturator
nerve divides into an anterior and posterior branch. The

482
Fig. 37.5 Obturator anatomy
Fig. 37.6 Obturator nerve, artery, and vein
anterior branch courses over the superior border of the
obturator externus muscle to supply the adductor longus,
gracilis, and adductor brevis muscles. The posterior branch
pierces the obturator externus muscle to supply the adductor magnus and adductor brevis. Obturator hernia sacs that
follow the anterior division of the obturator nerve pass
between the pectineus and above the obturator externus
muscle. Hernia sacs that follow the posterior division of the
obturator nerve pass through the obturator externus
muscle.
M.S. Kavic et al.
Clinical Presentation
Historically, obturator hernia has been associated with four
signs or symptoms [15]:
1. Intestinal obstruction (elderly females, frequently
intermittent)
2. Howship-Romberg sign
3. History of previous attacks
4. Palpable mass (rare)
Although the first two are the most common signs, the
nature of intestinal obstruction is usually unclear and the
Howship-Romberg sign only recalled after exploration has
revealed the presence of obturator hernia. Upon exploration,
up to 50% can be associated with gangrenous bowel, resulting in high perioperative morbidity and mortality. The hernia
can also present with a medial thigh mass [18], but the most
common symptoms are crampy abdominal pain and obstructive symptoms [9]. The absence of bowel motion and a high
serum urea level at the time of operation have been shown to
be independent factors for mortality [19].
A palpable mass is occasionally noted on rectal or pelvic
examination. However, since obturator hernia is rarely considered in a differential diagnosis of vague abdominal pain,
the presence of a mass in the obturator region is rarely
sought.
John Howship first noted the pain characteristic of obtura-
tor hernia in 1840. He described this pain as extending down
the inner surface of the involved thigh, exacerbated by thigh
extension, adduction or medial rotation [20] (Fig. 37.7).
Howship’s sign was independently described by Moritz
Romberg in 1848 [21]. Although the Howship-Romberg sign
is pathognomonic of obturator hernia, by no means is it
invariably present. About 50% of patients will complain of
this radicular pain or paresthesia down the inner aspect of
their thigh caused by compression of the cutaneous branch of
the obturator nerve in the narrow confines of the obturator
canal [15, 22]. Karasaki described that the HowshipRomberg sign is present in 67% of anterior obturator hernias
and only 30% of posterior [23].
Some have suggested that an obturator hernia develops
over several stages. It first begins as a prehernia with a plug
of preperitoneal connective tissue or “pilot tag” entering the
obturator canal [15] (Fig. 37.8). This concept was supported
by a post mortem study of female cadavers. In this report, a
“pilot tag” was found in 64% of female cadavers that were
examined [24]. The second stage of obturator hernia formation continues with dimpling of the peritoneum over the
obturator canal and progresses to invagination of a peritoneal
sac (Fig. 37.9). Finally in the evolution of an obturator her-

37 Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
483
Fig. 37.9 Reduction of an obturator canal hernia
nia, bowel, uterus, tube, or ovary may enter the peritoneal
sac and pass along the obturator canal.
Chronic pelvic pain can result from incarceration of tube
or ovary in the obturator hernia. Symptomatic intestinal
obstruction can result from incarceration of small or large
bowel in the obturator canal [25]. Delay of diagnosis, however, is common as an obturator hernia is usually not visible
or even palpable because of its deep location between the
pectineus and adductor longus muscles.
More recently, computerized tomography has developed
into a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluation of patients with
possible obturator hernia. In two small series, CT scans
detected the presence of an obturator hernia in 87 and 100%
of the cases studied [13, 14]. Gas below the superior pubic
ramus on plain film is diagnostic [18].
Fig. 37.7 Palpation of the obturator hernia
Fig. 37.8 Obturator canal pilot tag
Treatment
Despite advances in imaging technology, the mainstay of
diagnoses and treatment remains abdominal exploration.
Exploration may be via open laparotomy or with laparoscopic visualization. Literature supports that laparoscopy is a
safe and effective surgical option and has even been associated with decreased complications and hospital days
[26–28].
Regardless of the method used to obtain access, the entire
pelvis must be examined and evaluated. If bilateral obturator
defects are found, both hernias should be repaired.
After an obturator hernia has been identified, contents of
the sac are reduced and a preperitoneal dissection is done to
expose the internal obturator opening and obturator canal. At
this point, the internal opening of the obturator canal can be
closed with permanent monofilament suture securing periosteum of the symphysis pubis to fascia of the internal obtura-

484
M.S. Kavic et al.
tor muscle. It is necessary to take care not to injure the
obturator nerve or obturator vessels. An alternative method
to repair obturator hernia is to use permanent synthetic mesh
to secure the breach in the obturator membrane.
Polypropylene, polyester, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh can be used. Mesh must cover the entire defect
with a 2.5–3.0 cm overlap circumferentially and secured
with adequate fixation. In addition to the obturator opening,
it is usual to cover the entire myopectineal orifice—femoral
and inguinal orifices—with mesh (Fig. 37.10).
After the mesh has been secured, the operative area is
reperitonealized. Typically, the peritoneal incision is closed
with an intracorporeal running suture of 2-0 absorbable
suture; polydioxanone or polyglactin 910 are suitable choices
(Fig. 37.11).
Perineal Hernia
Perineal hernias are very rare hernias that insinuate themselves through muscle and fascia of the pelvic floor (pelvic
diaphragm) into the perineum (Fig. 37.12). The first report of
a perineal hernia was documented in 1743 by de Garangeot.
Moscowitz was the first to treat a perineal hernia surgically
in 1916. Perineal hernias have also been called ischiorectal
hernias, subpubic hernias, pudendal hernias, posterior labial
hernias, hernias of the pouch of Douglas, and vaginal hernias. Perineal hernias are commonly found in women and are
true hernias with a distinct peritoneal sac.
Congenital perineal hernias are very rare, with only nine
cases being reported in the literature [29]. Acquired (incisional) perineal hernias occur in both males and females
after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and after pelvic operations for genital malignancy (radical prostatectomy
and gynecological exenteration), though still being very rare
with rates of less than 1% and 3–7%, respectively [30].
Factors thought to contribute to perineal hernia include
the broad female pelvis, childbirth, injuries incident to childbirth, obesity, exenteration procedures for pelvic cancer,
abdominal perineal resection, and, in men, perineal prostatectomy. Perineal hernias may present anterior or posterior to
the superficial perineal muscle, through the levator ani, or
between the levator ani and coccygeus muscle.
Fig. 37.10 Obturator hernia mesh repair with tacks
Fig. 37.11 Closure of the peritoneum in obturator hernia repair
Anatomy
A pudendal hernia is an anterior perineal hernia that occurs
only in females. This hernia is also known as a labial hernia
and may protrude into the labium majus as an overt mass. A
pudendal hernia exits the pelvis through a triangle bounded
by the bulbocavernosus, ischiocavernosus, and transversus
perineal muscles [24]. A posterior perineal hernia may
emerge between fibers of the levator ani or between the levator ani and coccygeus muscles [31, 32]. Hernia contents can
be intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal, and contents usually
include the bowel and omentum, though unusual contents
such as bladder diverticulum and leiomyoma have been
reported [29].
Presentation
Perineal hernias are bounded by compliant muscle and soft
tissue and, as such, rarely cause intestinal obstruction. They
can, however, cause chronic pelvic pain. Typically, perineal
hernias present as a palpable, soft bulge in the perineum that

37 Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
Fig. 37.12 Location of
perineal hernias
485
Fig. 37.13 Perineal herniography (Note: the arrow is an X-ray mark
and is irrelevant to the present discussion)
is easily reducible or reduces itself when the patient is
recumbent. If an overt perineal bulge is not evident, herniography with intra-abdominal instillation of radiopaque
dye may be used to further refine a diagnosis of perineal
hernia (Figs. 37.13, 37.14, 37.15, and 37.16). A contrasted
CT scan is also helpful in identifying these hernias.
Fig. 37.14 Perineal herniography
Treatment
The only definitive treatment for perineal hernia is surgical
repair. Access to a perineal hernia can be obtained via a perineal incision, or transabdominally using open laparotomy or
laparoscopic techniques. Traditionally, these hernias have

486
M.S. Kavic et al.
Fig. 37.15 Perineal herniography. If an overt perineal bulge is not evident, herniography with intraabdominal instillation of radiopaque dye
may be used to further refine a diagnosis of perineal hernia
Fig. 37.16 Perineal herniography: X-ray fluoroscopy over 1 h
to fix the mesh, and the operative area is reperitonealized
closing the peritoneal incision with intracorporeal absorbable suture.
Supravesical Hernia
Supravesical hernias are herniation of abdominal content
through a supravesical fossa of the anterior abdominal wall.
They are classified as either external or internal supravesical
hernias [32]. External supravesical hernias pass inferiorly
through the supravesical fossa to present medially as direct
inguinal hernias or intraparietal hernias of the anterior inferior abdominal wall. Internal supravesical hernias pass
downward to enter the retropubic space of Retzius
(Fig. 37.17).
The diagnosis of supravesical hernias that exit through the
posterior inguinal wall or femoral canal may be obvious.
However, an internal supravesical hernia that passes into the
retropubic space of Retzius is usually more difficult to diagnose. Although a small bowel series, ultrasound, or computed tomography may aid in the workup, diagnosis is
usually made at abdominal exploration.
Management of supravesical hernia is that of operative
repair. Hernias that present as external supravesical hernias
(i.e., as direct hernias) may be managed with traditional Bassini
or Shouldice herniorrhaphy techniques or Lichtenstein anterior
hernioplasty with mesh. A laparoscopic repair is also feasible.
Hernia in the retropubic space of Retzius—internal supravesical hernia—may be better served with a transabdominal laparoscopic approach that permits a complete visualization of
abdomen and pelvis. As with other hernias of the abdomen and
pelvic wall, a preperitoneal dissection is performed after reduction of hernia content. Hernioplasty with appropriate synthetic
mesh and adequate overlap of hernia margins is followed by
reperitonealization of the operative site.
been repaired by closure of the perineal defect with nonabsorbable suture and the patient’s own tissues. This procedure, while grounded in the principles of classic open
surgery, has the disadvantage of using attenuated muscle and
fascia to secure the repair.
Another approach that is gaining favor for the evaluation
of abdominal and pelvic wall hernias has been that of laparoscopy [12]. A transabdominal laparoscopic examination
offers the benefit of minimal access with maximum visualization of potential hernia sites in the abdominal and pelvic
cavities. Once a perineal hernia has been visualized, its contents are reduced and a preperitoneal dissection carried out to
define the borders of the hernia defect. Permanent synthetic
mesh is used to cover and overlap the hernia defect with a
3 cm margin. Laparoscopic suture, staples, or tacks are used
Conclusion
In years past, diagnosis of hernia was only seriously
entertained when a mass was seen or a bulge was palpable
at a hernia’s point of presentation. This mindset did not
include the possibility of non-visualized, non-palpable
symptomatic hernias that were evident only at their site of
origin [33–36]. All the same, nonpalpable, clinically significant occult hernias do exist and in one series constituted 8% of those hernia cases repaired [33].
Occult symptomatic abdominal and pelvic wall hernias can be visualized at their site of origin with advanced
imaging and during laparoscopic exploration. The use of
laparoscopic visualization allows for the diagnosis and
repair of common and rare abdominal and pelvic wall
hernias at their site of origin rather that at their point of
presentation. A principle of hernia repair that was first

37 Hernias of the Pelvic Wall
Fig. 37.17 Supravesical
retropubic hernia
487
clearly articulated by Henri Fruchaud in his 1956 insightful discussion of groin anatomy and description of an
abdominal myopectineal orifice [36].
References
1. Howard FM. The role of laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain: promise and pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol Surg. 1993;48(6):357–87.
2. Kloch SC. Psychosomatic issues in obstetrics and gynecology. In:
Ryan KJ, Berkowitz R, Barberi RL, editors. Kistner’s gynecology.
Principles and practice. 6th ed. Mosby Yearbook Inc: St. Louis;
1995. p. 391–411.
3. Carter JE. Surgical treatment for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS.
1998;2(2):129–39.
4. Rapkin AJ, Mayer EA. Gastroenterologic causes of chronic pelvic
pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1993;20(4):663–83.
5. Black S. Sciatic hernia. In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE, editors. Hernia.
2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1978. p. 443–52.
6. Watson LF. Hernia: anatomy, etiology, symptoms, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. 3rd ed. CV Mosby: St
Louis; 1948.
7. Miklos JR, O’Reilly MJ, Saye WB. Sciatic hernia: a cause of chronic
pelvic pain in women. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(6):998–1001.
8. Cali RL, Pitsch RM, Blatchford GJ, et al. Rare pelvic floor hernias:
report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum.
1991;25:604–12.
9. Porrett PM. The surgical review: an integrated basic and clinical
science study guide. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins; 2010. p. 85–123.
10. Gaffney LB, Schand J. Sciatic hernia: a case of congenital occurrence. Am J Surg. 1958;95:974.
11. Losanoff J, Kjossen K. Sciatic hernia. Acta Chir Belg.
1995;95(6):269–70.
12. Kavic MS. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Amsterdam: Harwood
Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 33–40.
13. Haraguchi M, Matsuo S, Kanetaka K, Tokai H, Azyma T,
Yamaguchi S, Kanematsu T. Obturator hernia in an aging society.
Ann Acad Med. 2007;36(6):413–5.
14. Nakayama T, Kobayashi S, Shiraishi K, Nishiumi T, Mori S, Isobe
K, Furuta Y. Diagnosis and treatment of obturator hernia. Keio J
Med. 2002;51(3):129–32.
15. Gray SW, Skandalakis JE. Strangulated obturator hernia. In:
Nyhus LM, Condon RE, editors. Hernia. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB
Lippincott; 1978. p. 427–42.
16. Bjork KJ, Mucha P, Cahill DR. Obturator hernia. Surg Gynecol
Obstet. 1988;167(3):217–22.
17. Ritz TA, Deshmukh N. Obturator hernia. South Med J.
1990;83:709–12.
18. Fiser SM. The absite review. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Health; 2014. p. 246–7.
19. Chan KV, Chan CK, Yau KW, Cheung MT. Surgical moritiy and
mortality in obturator hernia: a 10-year retrospective risk factor
evaluation. Hernia. 2014;18(3):387–92.
20. Howship J. Practical remarks on the discrimination and appearances of surgical disease. London: John Churchill; 1840.
21. Romberg MH. Die operation des singeklemmten bruches des
eirunden loches. Operatio hernia foraminis ovales incarceratae.
In: Dieffenbach JF, editor. Die operative chirurgie, vol. 2. Leipzig:
F.A. Brockhaus; 1848.
22. Chung CC, Mok CO, Kwong KH, Ng EK, Lau WY, Li
AK. Obturator hernia revisited: a review of 12 cases in 7 years. J R
Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42:82–4.
23. Karasaki T, Nakagawa T, Tanaka N. Obturator hernia: the relationship between anatomical classification and the Howship-Romberg
sign. Hernia. 2014;18(3):413–6.
24. Singer R, Leary PM, Hofmeyer NG. Obturator hernia. S Afr Med J.
1955;29:74.
25. Xiaoyan C, Xiangyang S, Xiujun C. Stangulated intestinal obstruction secondary to a typical obturator hernia: a case report with literature review. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):213–6.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
