Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2593_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
67 Мб
Скачать
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Claesen M, Moustafa MA, Adline J, Vandervorst D, Poupaert JH. Evidence for an arene oxide-NIH shift pathway in the metabolic conversion of phenytoin to 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin in the rat and in man. Drug Metab Dispos. 1982;10(6):667–671.
Komatsu T, Yamazaki H, Asahi S, et al. Formation of a dihydroxy metabolite of phenytoin in human liver microsomes/cytosol: roles of cytochromes P450 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4. Drug Metab Dispos. 2000;28(11):1361–1368.
Karnes JH, Rettie AE, Somogyi AA, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2C9 and HLA-B genotypes and phenytoin dosing: 2020 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109(2):302–309. doi:10.1002/cpt.2008
Sandborn WJ. A review of immune modifier therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(3):423–433.
Eklund BI, Moberg M, Bergquist J, Mannervik B. Divergent activities of human glutathione transferases in the bioactivation of azathioprine. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;70(2):747–754. doi:10.1124/mol.106.025288
Rufo PA, Bousvaros A. Current therapy of inflammatory bowel disease in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2006;8(5):279–302. doi:10.2165/00148581­200608050-00002
Relling MV, Schwab M, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for thiopurine dosing based on TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes: 2018 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(5):1095–1105. doi:10.1002/cpt.1304
Zuckner J. Drug-related myopathies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1994;20(4):1017–1032.
Ramsey LB, Johnson SG, Caudle KE, et al. The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1 and simvastatin-induced myopathy: 2014 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(4):423–428. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.125
Phillips EJ, Sukasem C, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for HLA genotype and use of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine: 2017 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(4):574–581. doi:10.1002/cpt.1004
McCormack M, Alfirevic A, Bourgeois S, et al. HLA-A*3101 and carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Europeans. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(12):1134–1143. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1013297
Shiina T, Inoko H, Kulski JK. An update of the HLA genomic region, locus information and disease associations: 2004. Tissue Antigens. 2004;64(6):631–649. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0039.2004.00327.x
Wilson JT, Höjer B, Tomson G, Rane A, Sjöqvist F. High incidence of a concentration-dependent skin reaction in children treated with phenytoin. Br Med J. 1978;1(6127):1583–1586. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6127.1583
https://t.me/medicina_free
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
Pirmohamed M, Ostrov DA, Park BK. New genetic findings lead the way to a better understanding of fundamental mechanisms of drug hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(2):236–244. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.022
Martin MA, Hoffman JM, Freimuth RR, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for HLA-B genotype and abacavir dosing: 2014 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(5):499–500. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.38
Saito Y, Stamp LK, Caudle KE, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for human leukocyte antigen B (HLA-B) genotype and allopurinol dosing: 2015 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99(1):36–37. doi:10.1002/cpt.161
Ma JD, Lee KC, Kuo GM. HLA-B*5701 testing to predict abacavir hypersensitivity. PLoS Curr. 2010;2:RRN1203. doi:10.1371/currents.RRN1203
Dean L, Kane M. Allopurinol therapy and HLA-B*58:01 genotype. In: Pratt VM, Scott SA, Pirmohamed M, et al, eds. Medical Genetics Summaries. National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2012. Accessed January 28, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK127547/
Ferrell PB, McLeod HL. Carbamazepine, HLA-B*1502 and risk of Stevens­Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: US FDA recommendations. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9(10):1543–1546. doi:10.2217/14622416.9.10.1543
Mushiroda T, Takahashi Y, Onuma T, et al. Association of HLA-A*31:01 screening with the incidence of carbamazepine-induced cutaneous adverse reactions in a Japanese population. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(7):842–849. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0278
Gaedigk A. Complexities of CYP2D6 gene analysis and interpretation. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25(5):534–553. doi:10.3109/09540261.2013.825581
Riffel AK, Dehghani M, Hartshorne T, et al. CYP2D7 sequence variation interferes with TaqMan CYP2D6 (*) 15 and (*) 35 genotyping. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:312. doi:10.3389/fphar.2015.00312
Caudle KE, Sangkuhl K, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Standardizing CYP2D6 genotype to phenotype translation: consensus recommendations from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(1):116–124. doi:10.1111/cts.12692
Hicks JK, Bishop JR, Sangkuhl K, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98(2):127–134. doi:10.1002/cpt.147
Gasche Y, Daali Y, Fathi M, et al. Codeine intoxication associated with ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolism. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2827–2831. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041888
https://t.me/medicina_free
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
Crews KR, Monte AA, Huddart R, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for CYP2D6, OPRM1, and COMT genotypes and select opioid therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(4):888–
896. doi:10.1002/cpt.2149 Zhou SF, Liu JP, Chowbay B. Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450
enzymes and its clinical impact. Drug Metab Rev. 2009;41(2):89–295. doi:10.1080/03602530902843483
Theuretzbacher U, Ihle F, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of voriconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(7):649–663. doi:10.2165/00003088-200645070-00002
Abidi MZ, D’Souza A, Kuppalli K, Ledeboer N, Hari P. CYP2C19*17 genetic polymorphism—an uncommon cause of voriconazole treatment failure. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;83(1):46–48. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.05.002
Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE. Developmental pharmacology—drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(12):1157–1167. doi:10.1056/NEJMra035092
Lu H, Rosenbaum S. Developmental pharmacokinetics in pediatric populations. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(4):262–276. doi:10.5863/1551-6776-19.4.262
Sadler NC, Nandhikonda P, Webb-Robertson BJ, et al. Hepatic cytochrome P450 activity, abundance, and expression throughout human development. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44(7):984–991. doi:10.1124/dmd.115.068593
Ward RM, Kearns GL. Proton pump inhibitors in pediatrics: mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and pharmacodynamics. Paediatr Drugs. 2013;15(2):119–131. doi:10.1007/s40272-013-0012-x
Koukouritaki SB, Manro JR, Marsh SA, et al. Developmental expression of human hepatic CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;308(3):965–974. doi:10.1124/jpet.103.060137
Brüggemann RJM, van der Linden JWM, Verweij PE, Burger DM, Warris A. Impact of therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole in a pediatric population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(6):533–534. doi:10.1097/INF.0b013e318204d227
Netzer C, Biller-Andorno N. Pharmacogenetic testing, informed consent and the problem of secondary information. Bioethics. 2004;18(4):344–360. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00401.x
Haga SB, LaPointe NMA. The potential impact of pharmacogenetic testing on medication adherence. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13(6):481–483. doi:10.1038/tpj.2013.33
Guggino WB, Banks-Schlegel SP. Macromolecular interactions and ion transport in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(7):815–820. doi:10.1164/rccm.200403-381WS
https://t.me/medicina_free
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
Davies JC, Wainwright CE, Canny GJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of ivacaftor in patients aged 6 to 11 years with cystic fibrosis with a G551D mutation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(11):1219–1225. doi:10.1164/rccm.201301­0153OC
Heijerman HGM, McKone EF, Downey DG, et al. Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;394(10212):1940–1948. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32597-8
Stanek EJ, Sanders CL, Taber KAJ, et al. Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(3):450–458. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.306
Wu AC, Fuhlbrigge AL. Economic evaluation of pharmacogenetic tests. Clin
Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(2):272–274. doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.127 Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling. FDA. Published
online August 18, 2021. Accessed January 28, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/science-and-research-drugs/table­pharmacogenomic-biomarkers-drug-labeling
Ehmann F, Caneva L, Prasad K, et al. Pharmacogenomic information in drug labels: European Medicines Agency perspective. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;15(3):201–210. doi:10.1038/tpj.2014.86
Bell GC, Crews KR, Wilkinson MR, et al. Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(e1):e93–e99. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001993
Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Stallings SC, Gordon AS, et al. Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(4):482–489. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.137
Miller DT, Lee K, Chung WK, et al. ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23(8):1381–1390. doi:10.1038/s41436-021­01172-3
COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS, COMMITTEE ON GENETICS, AND, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF MEDICAL GENETICS AND, GENOMICS SOCIAL, ETHICAL, LEGAL ISSUES COMMITTEE. Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):620–
622. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3680 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Incidental findings in
clinical genomics: a clarification. Genet Med. 2013;15(8):664–666. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.82
Prince AER, Roche MI. Genetic information, non-discrimination, and privacy protections in genetic counseling practice. J Genet Couns. 2014;23(6):891–
902. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9743-2
https://t.me/medicina_free
88. Mills R, Haga SB. Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14(8):957–968. doi:10.2217/pgs.13.76
https://t.me/medicina_free
1
5
Managing Drug Overdoses and Poisonings
Iris Sheinhait
CORE PRINCIPLES
CHAPTER CASES
GENERAL MANAGEMENT
The most important aspect of patient management is to support airway, breathing, and circulation (the “ABCs”). There is no “cookbook” method to treat all poisoned patients, so it is important to treat the patient, not the poison or the laboratory values. The assessment and treatment of the potentially poisoned patient can be separated into seven functions: (a) gather history of exposure, (b) evaluate clinical presentation (ie, “toxidromes”), (c) evaluate clinical laboratory patient data, (d) remove the toxic source (eg, irrigate eyes,
Case 5-4 (Questions 1, 3, 5, 6)
https://t.me/medicina_free
1
1
decontaminate exposed skin), (e) consider antidotes and specific treatment, (f) enhance systemic clearance, and (g) monitor patient outcome.
GASTROINTESTINAL DECONTAMINATION
The most appropriate method for gastrointestinal (GI) tract decontamination is unclear because sound comparative data for different methods of GI decontamination are not available. Lavage, emesis, and cathartics are rarely performed because there is no evidence that they improve patient outcome. Activated charcoal is generally safe to use, but it should not be administered if the benefit is not greater than the risk. Whole-bowel irrigation using a polyethylene glycol– balanced electrolyte solution can successfully remove substances (iron, lithium, sustained-release dosage forms) from the entire GI tract in a period of several hours.
Case 5-3 (Questions 6, 7)
Case 5-4 (Questions 11, 12, 16)
Case 5-5 (Question 3)
ANTIDOTES
An antidote is a drug that reverses the toxicity of another substance. Some antidotes displace drugs from receptor sites (eg, naloxone for opioids, flumazenil for benzodiazepines), and some can inhibit the formation of toxic metabolites (eg, N-acetylcysteine [NAC]
Case 5-4 (Questions 2, 4)
https://t.me/medicina_free
1
1
for acetaminophen, fomepizole for ethylene glycol and methanol).
TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY SCREENING
Urine drug screens can be useful in a patient with coma of unknown etiology, when the presented history is inconsistent with clinical findings, or when more than one drug might have been ingested. Qualitative screening is intended to identify unknown substances involved in the toxic exposure. A benzodiazepine screen can detect oxazepam, a common benzodiazepine metabolite, but it will not detect alprazolam and lorazepam because they are not metabolized to oxazepam. Opioid screens may not detect synthetic opioids such as fentanyl and methadone. Quantitative testing determines how much of a known drug is present and can help determine the severity of toxicity and the need for aggressive interventions (eg, hemodialysis in ethylene glycol, methanol, and salicylate).
Case 5-4 (Questions 1, 7, 8)
TOXIDROMES
A toxidrome is a consistent constellation of signs and symptoms associated with some specific classes of drugs. The most common toxidromes are those associated with anticholinergic activity, increased sympathetic activity, and
Case 5-4 (Questions 1, 2, 5)
https://t.me/medicina_free
1
central nervous system (CNS) stimulation or depression. Anticholinergic drugs increase heart rate and body temperature, decrease GI motility, dilate pupils, and produce drowsiness or delirium. Sympathomimetic drugs increase CNS activity, heart rate, body temperature, and blood pressure. Opioids, sedatives, hypnotics, and antidepressants depress the CNS, but the specific class of CNS depressants often cannot be easily identified.
SALICYLATES
Acute ingestion of 150 to 300 mg/kg aspirin causes mild-to-moderate intoxication, >300 mg/kg indicates severe poisoning, and >500 mg/kg is potentially lethal. Symptoms of intoxication include vomiting, tinnitus, delirium, tachypnea, metabolic acidosis, respiratory alkalosis, hypokalemia, irritability, hallucinations, stupor, coma, hyperthermia, coagulopathy, and seizures. Salicylate intoxication mimics other medical conditions and can be easily missed. Patients with a chronic salicylate exposure, acidosis, or CNS symptoms, and those who are elderly are at high risk and should be considered for early dialysis.
Case 5-1 (Questions 1–3)
Case 5-2 (Questions 1–6)
IRON
https://t.me/medicina_free
1
1
1
Acute elemental iron ingestions of <20 mg/kg are usually nontoxic; doses of 20 to 60 mg/kg result in mild-to-moderate toxicity, and doses of >60 mg/kg are potentially fatal. Symptoms of toxicity include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, hematemesis, bloody stools, CNS depression, hypotension, and shock. Patients with severe iron poisoning do not exhibit the second stage of the so-called recovery but continue to deteriorate.
Case 5-3 (Questions 1–14)
TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS
Severe toxicity has been associated with doses of 15 to 25 mg/kg. Symptoms include tachycardia with prolongation of the PR, QTc, and QRS intervals; ST and T-wave changes; acidosis; seizures; coma; hypotension; and acute respiratory distress syndrome. A QRS segment >100 milliseconds is commonly seen in severe tricyclic antidepressant overdoses.
Case 5-4 (Questions 9–17)
ACETAMINOPHEN
Toxicity is associated with acute ingestions >150 mg/kg or >7.5 g total in adults. Symptoms in patients with toxicity include vomiting, anorexia, abdominal pain, malaise, and progression to characteristic centrilobular hepatic necrosis.
Case 5-5 (Questions 1–15)
https://t.me/medicina_free