Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5192_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
67 Мб
Скачать
6.7 Neural Neoplasms
Antoni B myxoid area
Verocay body
Antoni A spindle cells
Fig. 6.25 Schwannoma (high mag). (From Rapini RP. Neural neoplasms. In: Practical Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012:367–377.)
■
Degenerative atypia is present in “ancient schwannomas” (benign)
■
Boards tip: almost never see epidermis in biopsy specimen since so deeply seated (typically appears “shelled-out”)
10% of cases are bilateral acoustic neuromas seen in NF2
patients
Neurobroma (NF)
Benign proliferation of Schwann cells 1 other nerve
components (broblasts, perineurial cells, intermediate cells, and axons)
Flesh-colored soft nodule w/ “buttonhole sign
Histology: dermal location; not as well-circumscribed as
PEN; wavy “buckled” nuclei; cells haphazardly arranged; loose, myxoid stroma with mast cells and thin, wavy collagen bers
■
S1001, neurolaments1
10% have multiple lesions raises concern for NF1
Plexiform neurobromas (“bag of worms”):
pathognomonic of NF1; ↑ risk of transformation to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)
Nerve sheath myxoma (“neurothekeoma”)
Formerly called “neurothekeoma” or “myxoid
neurothekeoma” → terms have been abandoned and replaced by “nerve sheath myxoma” (preferred current name)
Soft skin-colored nodule; most commonly hands/ngers
of 40- to 50-year-old adults
Histology: plexiform proliferation of discrete myxoid
lobules containing bland spindle cells
■
S1001 (unlike cellular neurothekeoma) (Fig. 6.26)
Cellular neurothekeoma
Benign neoplasm; uncertain histogenesis
Firm, pink papules on face of young adults (20–30 years
old); F . M
Fig. 6.26 Nerve sheath myxoma: the tumor is composed of discrete lobules separated by brous septa. (From Calonje E, Damaskou V, Lazar AJ. Connective tissue tumors. In: Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar AJ, Billings SD, eds. McKee’s Pathology of the Skin . 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020:1698–1894.)
Histology: dermal proliferation; nests and fascicles of
epithelioid cells (cells resemble Spitz nevus cells or sarcoidal histiocytes)
■
Boards favorite: always S100 negative (vs. classic “neurothekeoma”); but S100A61, NKI/C31, and PGP
9.51
Granular cell tumor
Benign (malignant in 1%); neural-crest/Schwann cell
derived
Most common in adults (particularly females and African
Americans)
90% solitary; rm asymptomatic nodule; tongue (#1),
but any site affected
Histology: pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia overlying
an ill-dened dermal proliferation of large polygonal cells with abundant pink, granular cytoplasm and a small
365
CHAPTER 6 Neoplastic Dermatology
Fig. 6.27 Granular cell tumor. The tumor cells are large with abundant eosino­philic cytoplasm and uniform vesicular nuclei. (From Brinster NK, Liu V, Diwan H, McKee PH. Granular cell tumor. In: Dermatopathology: A Volume in the High Yield Pathology Series. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011:510–511.)
nucleus, pink cytoplasmic inclusions (pustulo-ovoid bodies of Milian 5 aggregated lysosomes) (Fig. 6.27)
■
S1001
■
Boards favorite: if see SCC-like epidermal changes look in dermis for granular cell tumor!
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)
Presents as a rapidly growing nodule within a plexiform
neurobroma (lifetime risk 5 2%–13%); may have a
large overlying CALM
Histology: densely cellular proliferation of atypical
spindle cells often with large areas of necrosis (“geographic necrosis”) and a high mitotic rate
■
Often only focally S1001
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Aggressive malignant neoplasm (deadlier than
melanoma); most common in elderly on head/neck; UV exposure is major risk factor; risk w/
immunosuppression
Erythematous to violaceous papulonodule which grows
rapidly and has high propensity for metastasis (LN metastasis 5 50%; distant metastasis 5 33%)
Pathogenesis: Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)
implicated in 80% of cases in the United States and
Europe; UVR also plays a major role
■
MCPyV integrates into host genome oncogene expression, Rb inhibition cell proliferation
MCPyV1: ↓ mutational burden and ↓ UV-signature mutations (vs. MCPyV recurrence risk)
■
UVR inactivating mutations in p53 and other tumor suppressor genes
Histology: inltrative or nodular dermal/subcutaneous
mass composed of sheets of uniform basaloid cells with high N:C ratio and nely speckled “salt-and-pepper”
tumors, which have higher
chromatin (usually without prominent nucleoli); numerous mitoses (often . 30/mm
2
) and apoptotic
cells
■
Positive stains: CK20 (paranuclear dot pattern, highly sensitive), neurolaments (paranuclear dot pattern, highly sensitive), chromogranin/synaptophysin, NSE, EMA, and CD56; MCPyV1 (80%)
■
Negative stains: TTF-1, CK7, S100, and CEA
Histologic DDx
■
Small cell lung carcinoma (main consideration!): TTF­11 and CK71; negative for CK20 and neurolaments
(lacks dot pattern)
■
Lymphoma: caution because MCC usually expresses PAX-51 (80%–90%) and TdT1 (70%)
Prognostic factors a/w poor outcomes
■
Clinical: male, immunosuppression, older age, head/ neck location, diameter . 2 cm, SLNB1
■
Histological: p631, inltrative (vs. nodular) growth pattern, lymphovascular invasion (detected via H&E or D2-40 immunostain), mast cell burden on histology, MCPyV
(debatable)
NCCN Workup and Treatment Guidelines
■
Initial workup
Given the high risk of MCC, additional initial workup warranted and includes:
♦ H&P, complete skin and LN exam ♦ Imaging is encouraged in most cases (whole-
body PET with fused axial imaging may be most sensitive for detecting metastasis at baseline)
♦ Consider quantication of serum MCPyV
oncoprotein antibodies
♦ If immunosuppressed, consider modication/
reduction of immunosuppression
■
Clinically node negative (N0)
Treatment
♦ No baseline risk factors excision with 1 to
2 cm margins and SLNB
If clear margins, negative SLNB, and no
adverse risk factors observe
If positive margins or other adverse risk factors
on excision specimen re-excision or RT
♦ One or more baseline risk factor excision with
individualized margins, SLNB, and adjuvant RT with multidisciplinary consultation
Baseline risk factors for MCC include:
Tumor size . 1 cm Chronic T-cell immunosuppression, HIV,
CLL, SOTR
H/N primary site Lymphovascular invasion
♦ SLNB negative
Observe if low risk Consider RT to nodal basin in high-risk
patients at increased risk for false-negative SLNB
♦ SLNB positive
Node dissection and/or radiation AND
adjuvant systemic therapy (preferably in a clinical trial, typically PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors)
♦ Recurrent locally advanced MCC consider
pembrolizumab
366

6.8 Smooth Muscle Neoplasms

■
Clinically node positive (N1)
Workup
♦ Imaging ♦ FNA or core biopsy
If negative excisional biopsy of LN or
radiographic surveillance
Treatment
♦ If node positive (N1) and no disseminated
metastasis (M0) on workup:
Node dissection and/or radiation AND
adjuvant systemic therapy (preferably in a clinical trial, typically PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors)
■
Disseminated MCC (M1)
Treatment (clinical trial preferred)
♦ Consider any of the following therapies or
combinations of:
Systemic therapy
Typically, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as
avelumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab
RT Surgery Palliative/supportive care
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (neuroblastoma)
Third most common childhood malignancy
Tumor of primitive neural crest cells of sympathetic
nervous system adrenal gland or retroperitoneum most common sites
■
In skin, usually metastatic although rarely can be primary
Clinical:
■
75% have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis
■
Cutaneous metastases are presenting sign in 30% w/ metastatic disease p/w multiple blue nodules on trunk and extremities
■
Peripheral blanching after stroking lesion, due to catecholamine release
■
“Raccoon eyes” (periorbital darkening/purpura) from orbital metastases
■
Urinary catecholamines (.90%)
■
Infants , 1 year old favorable prognosis; older children → poor prognosis
Histology: dermal or subcutaneous nodule composed of
small, round, blue cells
■
NSE1 and neurolaments1 → favors neuroblastoma over other small round blue cell tumors (lymphoma, MCC, small cell lung carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma)
■
FISH for n-Myc aids in diagnosis and is a/w worse prognosis
■
Pseudo Darier sign: stroking of lesion becomes red, painful, and elevated (as a result of contraction of smooth muscle)
Multiple lesions can occur as part of Reed syndrome (AD
inheritance, fumarate hydratase mutations, multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas and RCC) (Fig. 6.28)
Histology: ill-dened dermal proliferation of haphazardly
arrayed, intersecting fascicles of smooth muscle cells (spindle cells with bright pink cytoplasm and “cigar- shaped” nuclei); lacks mitotic activity (Fig. 6.29)
■
Stains: desmin1, SMA1, and caldesmon1; smooth muscle bers are pink-red with Masson trichrome stain
Fig. 6.28 Leiomyoma. Numerous grouped leiomyomata in a middle-aged woman manifesting as tender erythematous papules on the trunk. (From Brinster NK, Liu V, Diwan H, McKee PH. Leiomyoma and angioleiomyoma. In: Dermato- pathology: A Volume in the High Yield Pathology Series . Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011:523–524.)
6.8 SMOOTH MUSCLE NEOPLASMS
Pilar leiomyoma
Benign proliferation of smooth muscle arising from
arrector pili
Red-brown papules on trunk or extremities
■
Painful, especially with cold exposure
Fig. 6.29 Pilar leiomyoma. The reticular dermis is replaced by interlacing bundles of smooth muscle cells (H&E). (From Patterson JW. Tumors of muscle, cartilage, and bone. In: Weedon’s Skin Pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2016: 1029–1040.)
367
CHAPTER 6 Neoplastic Dermatology
Histologic DDx:
■
Smooth muscle hamartoma/Becker’s nevus: fewer and more discrete smooth muscle bundles interspersed in normal dermal collagen
■
Angioleiomyoma: larger and deeper; smooth muscle bundles circumferentially arrayed around collapsed vessels
Treatment: excision if solitary; if multiple gabapentin
or nifedipine (reduces smooth muscle contraction)
Genital Leiomyoma
Solitary lesions on the vulva, scrotum, and areola arising
from supercial network of smooth muscle found at these sites; asymptomatic
Histology: similar to pilar leiomyomas, but often larger,
less sharply circumscribed, and may have mitoses
Angioleiomyoma
Benign proliferation derived from smooth muscle in wall
of subcutaneous vessels
Most commonly middle-aged females on lower
extremity; frequently painful (Box 6.2)
Histology: subcutaneous, well-circumscribed nodule w/
compact fascicles of smooth muscle cells circularly arrayed around vessels with collapsed (“slit-like”) lumens
(Fig. 6.30)
■
Is a proliferation of muscle in vessel wall, not a proliferation of endothelial cells central vascular lumens are compressed by muscular wall “slit-like”
lumens surrounded by a ton of circularly arrayed smooth muscle
■
Stains: desmin1 (differentiates from myopericytoma), SMA1, calponin1 and h-caldesmon1
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS)
LMS divided into supercial and deep forms:
■
Deep LMS (subfascial variant): almost never encountered by dermatologists ( not discussed further); deep soft tissue sarcoma; often arises from smooth muscle walls of large vessels; usually fatal
■
Supercial LMS (suprafascial variant): most relevant variant for dermatologists; arises from arrector pili or genital/areolar smooth muscle; generally good
prognosis
Dermal LMS: most behave in indolent fashion, and some experts have argued they are not true malignancies; however, a 2014 study from Mayo Clinic reported a 10% metastatic rate with dermal LMS Subcutaneous LMS: arises from vascular smooth muscle; behaves more aggressively than dermal LMS → ↑ risk of metastases (esp. if diameter . 5 cm)
Red-brown nodules or plaques; most common on
extremities
Histology: ranges from low-grade (resemble leiomyoma,
but have cellularity, mitotic activity, and pleomorphism) to high-grade lesions (AFX-like)
■
Stains: desmin1 and SMA1
Box 6.2 Mnemonic: Painful Skin Lesions
“BANGLE(S)”
Blue rubber blebs Angiolipoma Neuroma Glomus tumors Leiomyoma Eccrine Spiradenoma
Fig. 6.30 Angioleiomyoma. (From Patterson JW. Tumors of muscle, cartilage,
and bone. In: Weedon’s Skin Pathology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021: 1081–1092.)

6.9 HEMATOLYMPHOID NEOPLASMS

Mycosis fungoides (MF)
Epidemiology
Accounts for 50% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas
Most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Onset typically in sixth or seventh decade, but can occur
in younger patients including children
Clinical features (Table 6.6)
Progression though patch, plaque, and tumor stages
Patch stage: irregular erythematous scaly patches occurring
in non–sun-exposed/bathing suit distribution; may be pruritic (Fig. 6.31A)
Plaque stage: well-demarcated variably shaped violaceous
to red-brown plaques; may be pruritic
Tumor stage: rapidly enlarging nodules with frequent
ulceration; arises in a background of patch and plaque
lesions (otherwise unlikely to be MF) (Fig. 6.31B)
Rare LN and visceral involvement
Histology
Patch stage: epidermotropic atypical lymphocytes
(enlarged w/ cerebriform, hyperchromatic nuclei) predominantly in the epidermis in clusters (Pautrier
368
6.9 Hematolymphoid Neoplasms
Table 6.6 Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Staging
Stage T N M B
IA
IB
IIA T1 or T2 N1: no dermatopathic histological evidence of MF
IIB
IIIA
IIIB T4 N0-N2 M0
IVA1 T1-T4 N0-N2 M0
IVA2 T1-T4 N3: lymph nodes involved w/ loss of normal
IVB T1-T4 N0-N3 M1: metastasis B0-B2
B, Blood; BSA, body surface area; M, metastasis; MF, mycosis fungoides; N, node; T, tumor.
T1: ,10% BSA T1a: patches T1b: plaques
T2: .10% BSA T2a: patches T2b: plaques
T3: tumors (lesions . 1 cm
diameter w/ deep infiltration)
T4: erythroderma (.80% BSA)
N0: no palpable nodes or histologic evidence of MF M0: no visceral
involvement
N0 M0 B0-B1
M0 B0-B1 N1a: clone-negative N1b: clone-positive N2: early involvement with MF, aggregates of atypi-
cal cells with preservation of nodal architecture N2a: clone-negative N2b: clone-positive
N0-N2 M0 B0-B1
N0-N2 M0 B0
M0 B0-B2
architecture
B0: ,5% peripheral lymphocytes
atypical B0a: clone-negative B0b: clone-positive B1: .5% of lymphocytes atypical
but , 1000/mL B1a: clone-negative B1b: clone-positive
B1: .5% of lymphocytes atypical but
,1000/mL
B2: .1000/mL circulating atypical
lymphocytes (Sézary cells)
A
Fig. 6.31 Mycosis fungoides. (A) Patch stage. (B) Tumor stage. (From James WD, Elston DM, McMahon PJ. Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, cutaneous T-cell lym­phoma, other malignant lymphomas, and allied diseases. In: Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin Clinical Atlas. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:501–516.)
microabscesses) and lined up at DEJ with clear halos surrounding the cells; supercial dermal band-like/ “lichenoid” lymphocytic inltrate (predominantly reactive lymphocytes); “wiry” papillary dermal brosis (Fig. 6.32)
B
■
Clue to epidermotropism (vs. exocytosis) 5
intraepidermal lymphocytes out of proportion to the degree of spongiosis
Plaque stage: more prominent epidermotropism w/ more
atypical lymphocytes in the dense dermal band-like inltrate
369
CHAPTER 6 Neoplastic Dermatology
Fig. 6.32 Mycosis fungoides. There is a band-like dermal inltrate with atypical lymphocytes in the basal epidermis (H&E). (From Patterson JW. Cutaneous inl­trates—lymphomatous and leukemic. In: Weedon’s Skin Pathology . 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2021:1225–1272.)
Tumor stage: density and depth of dermal inltrate of
atypical lymphocytes with decreased/absent epidermotropism
■
Large cell transformation dened by . 25% large cells (.4 times the size of a mature lymphocyte) 1/– CD30 expression (often present, but not required for diagnosis; CD30 negative a/w poor prognosis)
Immunophenotype:
■
Typical phenotype: CD31/CD41/CD8 mature T lymphocytes
■
Variable loss of pan T-cell markers: CD7 loss (most common, least specic) . CD5 and CD2 loss (less
common, more specic)
Histologic features are often ambiguous in early patch
stage → molecular testing for T-cell receptor gene rearrangement (TCR-GR) may be useful, but has pitfalls!
■
False positives: clonal rearrangements detected in some non­neoplastic inammatory dermatoses (including eczema) must correlate w/ clinical and histologic ndings
■
False negatives: common in very early patch stage
Hypopigmented MF (variant): favors darkly pigmented
patients; more common presentation in young patients; usually CD4 /CD81→ cytotoxic phenotype a/w more interface changes (apoptotic keratinocytes and pigment incontinence) explains hypopigmentation seen clinically
advanced MF and Sezary patients, but a/w high mortality and recurrence) represent other treatment options
Clinical variants
Folliculotropic: 10% of patients; head/neck area a/w
papules/acneiform lesions (early) to plaques with alopecia (advanced) (Fig. 6.33); histology: atypical inltrates involve follicular epithelium 1 follicular mucinosis; depth makes it more refractory to treatment worse prognosis (similar to tumor stage MF), sustained remission is rare
Pagetoid reticulosis (Woringer-Kolopp disease): rare,
progressive solitary psoriasiform plaque on distal extremities; histology: very prominent epidermotropism in a pagetoid pattern; good prognosis
Granulomatous slack skin: extremely rare; sagging skin
folds in the axilla/groin; granulomatous inammation w/ multinucleated giant cells, atypical lymphocytes, and prominent elastophagocytosis ( loss of elastic recoil); indolent course; usually evolves to classic MF; up to 30% develop Hodgkin lymphoma
Sézary syndrome
Erythroderma (intensely pruritic); lymphadenopathy and
neoplastic Sézary cells in the skin, blood, and LNs; considered distinct from MF
Must demonstrate a circulating population of CD4
1
neoplastic T-cells with an absolute count . 1000 cells/mL or expanded CD4
1
CD4
/CD7- cells $ 40% or CD41/CD26 cells $ 30%
1
T-cell population n CD4/CD8 ratio $ 10,
Histologic features may be nonspecic or resemble MF
(often more spongiosis, less epidermotropism than typical MF); CD4
1
/8 , PD-11, TOX1, KIRDL21
Treatment: ECP 1 systemic therapies (e.g., bexarotene);
chemotherapy, mogamulizumab, and alemtuzumab for worse cases; poor prognosis
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL)
a/w HTLV-1 virus → endemic in areas with high virus
prevalence (Japan, Caribbean, Central Africa)
p/w leukemia, lymphadenopathy, organomegaly,
hypercalcemia, and skin lesions; poor prognosis
Treatment
Patch/plaque stage: topical/intralesional steroids, topical
nitrogen mustard/mechlorethamine, topical bexarotene/ alitretinoin, and phototherapy, (NB UVB for patch and PUVA)
Can add methrotrexate (MTX) or pralatrexate, oral
acitretin or bexarotene for progressive disease
More advanced disease: histone deacetylase inhibitors
(vorinostat, romidepsin, resminostat), brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30 antibody) for transformed MF, mogamulizumab (anti-CCR4 antibody; useful because MF homes to skin using CCR4)
Systemic chemotherapy (e.g., CHOP, gemcitabine,
doxorubicin): reserved for advanced/rapidly progressive disease, risk of secondary infections; radiotherapy (local if few tumors vs. total skin electron beam for generalized plaques/tumors), ECP (for erythrodermic MF), and allogeneic stem cell transplant (effective for some
370
Fig. 6.33 Alopecia mucinosa. (From James WD, Elston DM, Treat JR, Rosenbach MA, Neuhaus IM. Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, other malignant lymphomas, and allied diseases. In: Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020:731–749.)
6.9 Hematolymphoid Neoplasms
Histopathology resembles MF, but has characteristic
oret” or “clover-leaf” malignant T cells
■
Immunophenotype: CD41/CD8 /CD251, PD-1
1
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP)
CD301 lymphoproliferative disorder, along with ALCL
(see below) and “borderline” cases—this group of
A
disorders are indolent with recurrences but good prognosis overall
Any age, but favors adults in 40s (vs. PLEVA, which favors
children); multiple (10–20 lesions usually), recurrent, ulcerative, and red-brown papulonodules on trunk and extremities individual lesions self-resolve in 1 to
2 months heals w/ atrophic varioliform scars (Fig. 6.34A)
Erythrocytes in epidermis
Edematous dermal papilla
Localized papule of
lymphocytes
Eosinophil
Neutrophil
Atypical lymphocytes
Erythrocyte
B
C
Fig. 6.34 Lymphomatoid papulosis. (A) Clinical presentation with varied skin lesions (e.g., papules, pustules, necrotic lesions) in different stages of evolution. (B) and (C) Diffuse inltrate, extending into the dermis, with atypical lymphocytes, as well as some neutrophils and neutrophils. ( A, From James WD, Elston DM, McMahon PJ. Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, other malignant lymphomas, and allied diseases. In: Andrews’ Diseases of the Skin Clinical Atlas Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:501–516. B and C, From Rapini RP. Myeloproliferative disorders. In: Rapini RP, ed. Practical Dermatopathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021:341–364.)
371
CHAPTER 6 Neoplastic Dermatology
Histology (all histological variants have the same clinical
presentation)
■
Type A (75%; most classic form, most important for Boards): wedge-shaped inltrate with clusters of large,
atypical, Reed-Sternberg-like CD301 (Ki-1) lymphocytes, mitotic activity and atypical mitoses, mixed inammation (lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils); overlying ulceration and parakeratotic
scale (see Fig. 6.34B and C)
■
Type B (MF-type, 10%–15%): histologically resembles patch/plaque MF; epidermotropic inltrate of small, hyperchromatic, cerebriform CD41 cells; CD30 usually negative (rarely see large CD301 cells in this variant)
■
Type C (ALCL-type, 10%): dense pan-dermal inltrate with sheets of CD41/CD82/CD301 large lymphocytes; histologically indistinguishable from anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and large cell transformation of tumor-stage MF → need clinical correlation
■
Type D (epidermotropic CD81 variant, ,5%): abundant epidermotropic CD4-/CD81/CD301 cells; histologically resembles aggressive epidermotropic T-cell lymphoma, but has much better prognosis need clinical correlation to ensure correct diagnosis; also could confuse histologically with pagetoid reticulosis (very different clinical presentation)
■
Type E (angioinvasive LyP; ,5%): Angiodestructive clusters of small-medium CD4
2
/CD81/CD30
1
lymphocytes, along with brinous vasculitis/thrombi; histologically resembles extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma,
■
Type 6p25.3 (chromosomal rearrangement of DUSP22-
gd-TCL, angioinvasive ALCL
IRF4): Biphasic growth pattern 5 small cerebriform lymphocytes in epidermis and dense collections of large, atypical lymphocytes in dermis; CD4
1
CD30
immunophenotype
2
/CD82/
TCGR clonal rearrangement in 40%–90% (not correlated w/
biologic behavior); identical clones may be demonstrated in peripheral blood of patients with severe disease
Excellent prognosis (.99% disease-specic survival;
overall survival at 10 years 5 92%)
Up to 25% of LyP patients have an associated malignant
lymphoma (MF . Hodgkin disease, ALCL . others);
may arise before, during or after LyP diagnosis; recommend Q6-12mo followup to assess for development of malignant lymphoma
■
Fascin, TGF-b pathway, CD30 promotor alterations all a/w hrisk of associated malignant lymphoma (MF, ALCL, HD, etc.)
■
Editor note (TH): I often wonder if LyP is not truly a disease sui generis, but rather a “clinical reaction pattern” or clinical phenotype that arises when a “pre-lymphomatous cell” with some oncogenic driver mutation for lymphoid cells attempts to grow into a full-blown lymphoma but lacks the necessary “second-hit” (may be one of the genes already shown to be a/w hrisk of developing a secondary malignant lymphoma) n without a second-hit, the lesion regresses/is partially killed off by the patient’s immune system n clinical lesion regression. This could explain
why LyP has one common clinical presentation despite having many histological variants with vastly different
immunophenotypes, and why multiple distinct types of malignant lymphomas have been seen to arise in
association with LyP. In fact, some experts have recently raised concern that Type B LyP may be better classied as papular MF. I think it is possible that LyP may just be a “common clinical phenomenon” that can be seen during the progression of multiple distinct types of malignant lymphomas early in their tumorigenesis (“lymphomagenesis”) when they have enough “juice” to get started (papules, nodules), but not enough to keep it going, so they regress. Over time, perhaps some of these aspiring lymphomas develop the necessary second-hit that allows them to become full-edged MF or pcALCL. Further research and time will tell!
Treatment: only treat if symptomatic, because treatment
does not prevent secondary lymphomas; MTX dramatic improvement in 90% (recurs within weeks of stopping), phototherapy is also rst line; brentuximab can be used if the former therapies are ineffective
Boards pearls
■
Type A LyP is distinguished from PLEVA by presence of
large CD301 cells, and “dirty inltrate” containing numerous eosinophils (never seen in PLEVA) and
neutrophils
■
25% have antecedent, concurrent, or subsequent malignant lymphomas (MF . ALCL, Hodgkin lymphoma . others)
■
Dermal hypersensitivity reactions (scabies, bug bites, and drug reactions) often have scattered CD301 cells may histologically mimic LyP
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL)
Must exclude systemic ALCL!!!
Solitary (.multiple [20%]), growing, ulcerated tumors up
to 10 cm (larger than LyP); usually adults, M . F; unlike LyP, lesions do not rapidly “come and go”
Frequently persists/relapses in skin; infrequent nodal
involvement (10%)
Histology: sheets of large, atypical CD30
comprising . 75% of inltrate
1
lymphocytes
Usually lack ALK translocations (vs. systemic ALCL);
EMA negative as well
6p25.3 rearrangements (DUSP22-IRF4) predicts good
prognosis in systemic ALCL; found in 25%–30% of pcALCL
Very good prognosis (90% 5-year survival)
■
Features a/w poor prognosis: older age, generalized skin involvement, no spontaneous remission, leg
involvement/extensive regional single-limb disease, solid organ transplant
Treatment: surgical excision or radiation (rst-line);
low-dose MTX (second-line); Brentuximab vedotin (anti-CD30 antibody) is a good option in recalcitrant cases or for spread to lymph nodes
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL)
Lymphoma composed of CD4–/ CD81/ CD56–/ TIA11/
Granzyme B1 (cytotoxic) T lymphocytes with a/b phenotype
■
Category previously included aggressive forms now re-classied as g/d-delta T-cell lymphoma (universally fatal)
372

6.10 Fibrohistiocytic Neoplasms

Any age affected; generalized subcutaneous nodules on
legs and trunk; lesion regression n focal lipoatrophy;
systemic symptoms may occur (e.g., fever, weight loss, h LFTs, cytopenia)
Histology: subcutaneous lobular inltrate of neoplastic
T cells that “rim” adipocytes; prominent necrotic debris
and cytophagocytosis (“beanbag cells”); lacks interface changes at DEJ and angiodestruction (vs. g/d-delta T-cell lymphoma); lacks nodular lymphoid aggregates and germinal center formation (vs. lupus profundus)
Good prognosis (80% 5-year survival), but 15% develop
hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (high mortality, may be a/w HAVCR2 mutations);
Treatment: steroids, MTX, cyclosporine
Primary cutaneous g/d T-cell lymphoma
Aggressive CD4 /CD8 (“double negative”) T-cell
lymphoma w/ expression of g/d T-cell receptor and cytotoxic markers (CD561, TIA-11, granzyme B1, and
perforin1)
■
b-F1 negative (vs. SPTCL, which is b-F11), TCR-d positive
Multiple eroded nodules and plaques 1 visceral involvement
Histology: dense dermal and subcutaneous lymphoid
inltrate w/ epidermotropism, lichenoid interface changes (major clue), vascular destruction, 1/– fat rimming (mimicking SPTCL)
■
Lichenoid interface changes distinguish from SPTCL (which never has epidermal involvement)
■
Lupus profundus is extremely hard to distinguish g/d stain is helpful; also lupus tends to have reactive lymphoid follicles with clusters of CD1231 plasmacytoid dendritic cells (not seen in g/d TCL)
Rapidly fatal
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type
1
EBV
lymphoma with NK phenotype
Abrupt onset of ulcerated tumors, most commonly on
nasal region
Histology: variably sized neoplastic cells with prominent
vascular destruction, 1/– epidermotropism
CD21/CD561 and CD31 (cytoplasmic, not surface)
Usually fatal
Aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic (CD81) T-cell lymphoma
Primary cutaneous CD4-positive small/ medium pleomorphic T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder
Presents as a solitary plaque or nodule on the head/neck
(.upper trunk) with an excellent prognosis
Histology: dense dermal/subcutaneous inltrate of small
to medium lymphocytes; minimal to no epidermotropism; MF-like immunophenotype (CD4 CD8
/CD30 )
1
/
Histology and immunophenotype indistinguishable from
tumor stage MF → need clinical correlation (lacks preceding MF patches/plaques)
CD81 acral T-cell lymphoma
Usually 1 or a few nodules on acral sites
Histology: dense dermal inltrate of small-to-medium
atypical lymphocytes (CD31, CD81, TIA-11) with nuclear atypia; no epidermotropism; perinuclear dot pattern with CD68 stain
Indolent course with good prognosis; surgical excision or
radiotherapy if needed
Primary cutaneous B-cell neoplasms
B-cell neoplasms limited to the skin after systemic workup
(except intravascular B-cell lymphoma); relatively less common than T-cell neoplasms
IgH clonality studies are useful in differentiating low-grade
B-cell lymphomas from cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia
Typically CD201 and CD79a1 (Table 6.7)
Leukemia cutis
Most commonly acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
■
Generally there is preceding marrow and peripheral blood involvement, but aleukemic forms can occur
Violaceous papules and nodules at any location
Skin involvement is most common with myelomonocytic
and monocytic types
Histology: Grenz zone, diffuse dermal inltrate
of myeloid blasts (monotonous cells with high
N:C ratio and ne chromatin); may be seen in sheets, nodules, perivascularly, or as inltrative cords (“Indian-ling”)
MPO1, CD117 (c-KIT)1, CD131, CD331, and
CD341
Boards fodder: chloromas 5 green nodules in the setting
of AML, because of myeloperoxidase activity
Old name 5 Ketron-Goodman type of pagetoid
reticulosis
Eruptive ulcerated tumors with visceral involvement
Histology: malignant, cytotoxic, CD81 inltrate with
prominent epidermotropism and angiodestruction
■
Histologically indistinguishable from other epidermotropic CD81 lymphomas (MF, pagetoid reticulosis, and type D LyP) distinction best made clinically
Usually fatal
6.10 FIBROHISTIOCYTIC NEOPLASMS
Dermatobroma (DF)
Common benign brohistiocytic lesion; favors adults
(F . M); most commonly on lower extremities
Firm dermal papules w/ overlying pigmentation and
dimple” sign (moves downward when pinched)
Unclear pathogenesis, may be related to prior trauma/bug
bite
373
CHAPTER 6 Neoplastic Dermatology
Table 6.7 Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas
Clinical Features Histopathologic Features
Primary cutaneous
follicle center cell lymphoma
Primary cutaneous
marginal zone lymphoma
Primary cutaneous
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type
Intravascular B-cell
lymphoma
Violaceous, usually solitary papule or nodule on the
scalp/forehead or back (“Crosti lymphoma”); excellent prognosis
Purple to brown nodule on the upper extremities or
trunk; excellent prognosis
Elderly, F . M; red to brown nodule on distal
extremity (leg #1), but can occur at other sites; must exclude systemic disease; less favorable prognosis (5-year survival 5 50%)
Purple patches and plaques; trunk/thighs; usually
systemic involvement including CNS (neuro deficits), but can be limited to the skin
Irregularly shaped neoplastic follicles; lacks a well-dened mantle zone and
tingible body macrophages
-Usually lacks t(14;18) IgH-Bcl-2 translocation characteristic of systemic
follicular lymphoma
-BCL-6(1) and BCL-2(–)
-Boards Mnemonic: Severity of cutaneous B-Cell lymphomas correlates
with their “BCL score:” Marginal zone lymphoma (least dangerous, low­est “BCL score” 5 2, because BCL-2 1) , Primary cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma (second least dangerous, second lowest “BCL score” 5 6, because BCL-61) , pcDLBCL (highest danger level, highest “BCL score” 5 8, because BCL-21 and BCL-61)”
Nodular dermal inltrate with prominent monocytoid B cells (small lympho-
cytes with clear halo) and often numerous plasma cells (major clue), some with Dutcher bodies
-BCL-6(–) and BCL-2(1)
Dense sheets of large round, markedly atypical lymphocytes w/ mitoses
and apoptotic debris in dermis and possibly subcutis; Grenz zone
-Bcl-21, BCL-61 (most cases), and MUM-1 1
Large atypical CD201 B lymphocytes within vessels
Histology: dermal spindle cell proliferation with
whorled/curlicue pattern, peripheral collagen trapping, admixed inammatory cells, Touton-type giant cells that may contain hemosiderin, overlying epidermal
hyperplasia (“tabled rete”), basal hyperpigmentation and folliculosebaceous induction (Boards tip—induction may resemble supercial BCC!!!); frequently abuts but never deeply inltrates fat
■
Immunophenotype:
Positive: Factor XIIIa, CD10 (strong, diffuse), stromelysin-3 (distinguishes from DFSP) Negative: CD34, S100, and pan-keratin
Key distinguishing features of DF (vs. DFSP):
■
Collagen trapping (best appreciated at periphery)
■
Touton-type giant cells and foamy histiocytes (never seen in DFSP)
■
Hemosiderin-laden histiocytes/Touton giant cells (never seen in DFSP)
■
DF only “irts” with upper part of fat, but never penetrates it deeply (Fig. 6.35)
■
Epidermal and folliculosebaceous induction (rarely seen in DFSP)
■
Factor XIIIa1, stromelysin-31, and CD34 negative
DF variants:
■
Cellular DF: cellularity, cells arranged in longer fascicles; more mitoses; most common type to be confused w/ DFSP (see above clues)
■
Hemosiderotic: prominent hemosiderin and small blood vessels
■
Lipidized/xanthomatous: prominent foam cells
■
Aneurysmal: large cavernous vascular spaces; clinically worrisome for melanoma or malignant vascular lesion
■
DF with “monster” cells: contains large, bizarre, and highly pleomorphic cells; mitoses are rare, never see atypical mitoses
Risk of local recurrence w/ aneurysmal, atypical, and
cellular DFs re-excision recommended
Fig. 6.35 Cellular dermatobroma (cellular benign brous histiocytoma). Stellate­shaped lesion that extends into the supercial subcutis along brous septa. (From Buehler F, Billings SD. Soft tissue tumors and tumor-like reactions. In: Busam KJ, ed. Dermatopathology: A Volume in the Series: Foundations in Diag- nostic Pathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016:513–594.)
Dermatobrosarcoma protuberans
Tumor of intermediate malignant potential characterized
by t(17;22) COL1A1-PDGFB fusion
■
Most common abnormality: supernumerary ring chromosomes (chr22 most commonly)
Young to middle-aged adults; M F; favors trunk (shoulder
#1), proximal extremities, and groin » head/neck
Mnemonic: “DFSP affects people 17 to 22 years old
Called Pat” helps remember young age (17–22) and the order of the fused genes (17 5 COL1A1; 22 5 PDGFB)
Firm plaque that expands and develops multinodular
appearance (Fig. 6.36)
374
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана