Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4416_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать
A B C
Figs. 28.22A to C: Nonenhancing masses. (A) Mycetoma; (B) Retained secretions; and
(C)Frontalmucocele(withossifyingbroma).
407Chapter 28 Imaging Approach to Sinus Lesions
A B
Figs. 28.23A and B: Masses with mild-moderate enhancement. (A) Malignancies: Squamous
cellcarcinoma(SCC);and(B)Largeodontogeniclesions:Juvenileossifyingbroma.
Section 7 Clinico-Radiological Approach408
A
C
Figs. 28.24A to D: Masses with intense enhancement. (A) Antrochoanal polyp; (B) Sinonasal
angiomatouspolyp;(C)Juvenilenasopharyngealangiobroma;and(D)Hemangioma.
A
B
D
B
C
Figs. 28.25A to D: Specic patterns of enhancement. (A) Internal septal (linear) enhancement:
Antrochoanal polyp; (B) Smooth rim/mural enhancement: Sinusitis; (C) Cerebriform pattern: Inverted papilloma; and (D) Lobular: Sinonasal angiomatous polyp.
D
Table 28.5: Dierentials according to degree and
pattern of enhancement on CECT/CEMRI.
Nonenhancing (Figs. 28.22A to C)
• Mycetoma
• Retained
secretions
• Retention cyst
• Mucocele
(CECT: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography; CEMRI: Contrast-enhanced magnetic reso nance imaging).
Mild-Moderate (Figs. 28.23A and B)
• Malignancies
• Large odontogenic lesions
Intense (Figs. 28.24A to D)
• Antrochoanal polyp
• Sinonasal angiomatous polyp
• Hemangioma
• Juvenile nasopharyngeal
angiobroma.
Specic pattern (Figs. 28.25A to D)
• Internal septal (linear) enhancement:
Polyps
• Smooth rim/mural enhancement:
Sinusitis,retention cysts,and
mucocele
• Cerebriform pattern: Inverted
papilloma
• Heterogeneous enhancement with necrosis: Tumors
• Lobular: Sinonasal
angiomatous polyp.
409Chapter 28 Imaging Approach to Sinus Lesions
DIFFUSIONWEIGHTED IMAGING
In general, benign lesions show free diusion and malignant lesions show restriction. reshold apparent diusion coecient (ADC) value of 1.791 × 10–3 mm2/s has been suggested for dierentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobromas (Fig. 28.26A) show high mean ADC values (> 2.168 ± 0.270 × 10–3 mm2/s).
However, certain lesions may show discordant behavior:
Benign lesions which can show restricted diusion (Fig. 28.26B):
Meningioma ▶ Hemangiopericytoma ▶ Solitary brous tumor.
Malignant lesions which can show facilitated diusion (Figs. 28.27A
and B):
Chondrosarcoma ▶ Fibromyxoid sarcoma ▶ Adenocarcinoma ▶ Adenoid cystic carcinoma.
8
8
9
Section 7 Clinico-Radiological Approach410
A B
Figs. 28.26A and B: Benign lesions (DWI). (A) Facilitated diffusion with high ADC value (mean
> 2.168 ± 0.270 × 10–3 mm2/s): Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobroma; and (B) Restricted
diffusion:Meningioma.(ADC:Apparentdiffusioncoefcient;DWI:Diffusion-weightedimaging)
A B
Figs. 28.27A and B: Malignant lesions which can show facilitated diffusion. (A) Chondro-
sarcoma; and (B) Adenocarcinoma.
LOCATIONWISE RADIOLOGICAL APPROACH
Location within the sinonasal cavity is useful for suggesting possible
etiology.
e approach to lesions in the Nasal Cavity (Chapter 26) and Frontonasal:
Congenital lesions (Chapter 20) have been described elsewhere.
Specic sinuses (maxillary, frontal, sphenoethmoid) have certain disease
processes limited to the respective sinus.
Radiological Approach to Maxillary Sinus
Isolated involvement of unilateral maxillary sinus results from two
mechanisms.
is can be due to either ostium block or extension/complication of
dental lesion.
Flowchart 28.4: Unilateral maxillary sinus disease.
411Chapter 28 Imaging Approach to Sinus Lesions
A C
D F
Figs. 28.28A to F: Unilateral maxillary sinus involvement (ostium block). (A) Chronic
rhino sinusitis; (B) Mycetoma; (C) Antrochoanal polyp; (D) Angiomatous polyp; (E) Inverted papi lloma; and (F) Squamous cell carcinoma.
B
E
is is illustrated in Flowchart 28.4.
Lesions which expand the infundibulum with unilateral maxillary sinus
involvement include antrochoanal polyp, sinonasal angiomatous polyp, inverted papilloma, mycetoma, rhinoscleroma, and squamous cell carcinoma (Figs. 28.28 and 28.29).
4
Section 7 Clinico-Radiological Approach412
A B C
Figs. 28.29A to C: Unilateral maxillary sinus involvement (extension/complication of dental
lesion). (A) Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KOT); (B) Ameloblastoma; and (C) Infection
followingmaxillaryoordisruption.
Radiological Approach to Frontal Sinus Based on Various Considerations
Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: Although less common than maxillary
or ethmoid sinusitis, intracranial and orbital complications are more frequent from this site. Erosion of its anterior table results in subperiosteal swellings called “Pott’s puy tumor”.
Frontal sinus is also least common site of involvement with acute invasive
fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFRS), and is generally involved in combination with other paranasal sinuses.
On the other hand, in allergic frontal sinusitis, the frontal sinus is involved
in more than two-thirds of cases.
Frontal sinus is the most common site of a mucocele.
Cerebrospinal uid (CSF) rhinorrhea may occur when fractures involve
the posterior table, or with involvement of frontal sinus drainage pathway.
Frontal sinus can also be site for encephalocele.
Frontal sinus is a common site for osteoma, ossifying broma, and
brous dysplasia.
Inverted papilloma can also occur in frontal sinus, through far less
frequently than the lateral nasal wall.
Rare in frontal sinus with squamous cell carcinoma still being the most
common (Figs. 28.30A to F).
Sphenoethmoidal Region (Figs. 28.31A to C)
e sphenoid sinus (SS) and posterior ethmoidal cells are in close
proximity, and their roof contributes to central skull base (CSB); these are hence often considered together.
Lesions in this region may originate from within the sinonasal cavity or
from adjoining structures. Pituitary gland lesions may extend into the SS inferiorly. Similarly, aggressive nasopharyngeal nasal masses may involve SS, while cavernous sinus lesions can enter from lateral walls. Posteriorly SS is bordered by the basisphenoid (joining upper part of
413Chapter 28 Imaging Approach to Sinus Lesions
A
C
B
D
E
Figs. 28.30A to F: Major disease entities of the frontal sinus. (A) Chronic sinusitis; (B)
Allergicfungalsinusitis;(C)Mucocele;(D)Osteoma;(E)Ossifyingbroma;and(F)Fibrous
dysplasia.
F
Section 7 Clinico-Radiological Approach414
A B
C
Figs. 28.31A to C: Disease entities of the
sphenoethmoidal region. (A) Extension of
juvenile nasopharyngeal angiobroma; (B)
Extension of pituitary macroadenoma; and (C) Mucocele.
clivus) and posterolaterally by the petro-occipital structures. Hence, osseous pathologies of these sites may also invade the sinus.
6
ere are several routes of spread from this region to cranium – superiorly
through planum ethmoidale and planum sphenoidale; laterally to caver­nous sinus and to superior orbital ssure and posteriorly to clivus and even posterior fossa.
Critical inferior and inferolateral relations are the vidian canal [vidian
artery—internal carotid artery (ICA) branch] and foramen rotundum (maxillary nerve) and inferolaterally the pterygoid plexus.
Anatomic variants of SS pose signicant surgical risk due to proximity to
critical structures particularly ICA and optic nerve.
Variable pneumatization of sphenoid can appear as pseudolesions on
both CT and MRI, as can the variable MR signal of basisphenoid.
Sphenoid bone mostly contains medullary bone predisposing it to
hematogenous spread of diseases.
IMPORTANT DIFFERENTIALS WITH ILLUSTRATIVE CASE FIGS. 28.32A TO F
e dierentiating features between sinusitis and malignancy in Table 28.6.
2,5
are detailed
415Chapter 28 Imaging Approach to Sinus Lesions
A
C
E
Figs. 28.32A to F: Differentiating features of chronic invasive fungal sinusitis and
malignancy. (A)Mildlyhyperdense,lessextensivesofttissueinsinusitis;(B)Heterogeneously enhancing, extensive soft tissue in malignancy; (C) Focal erosions with bone sclerosisin
sinusitis; (D) Extensive bone erosions in malignancy; (E) Hypointense signal on T2-weighted image (T2WI) in sinusitis; and (F) Intermediate T2 signal in malignancy.
B
D
F
Section 7 Clinico-Radiological Approach416
Table 28.6: Dierentiating features of sinusitis and malignancy.
Sinusitis (chronic invasive fungal sinusitis) Malignancy
CT
Soft tissue • Less extensive
• May be hyperdense
Bony changes • Sclerosis present
• Erosions in invasive forms
• Short,irregularusually
seen in region of normal dehiscence
MRI Chronic secretions:
• T1WI: Intermediate/ hypointense
• T2WI: Hypointense
Acute mucoid secretions
• T1WI: Hypointense
• T2WI: Hyperintense.
CEMR: Peripheral rim
enhancement/mucosal enhancement
Distribution More diffuse Mostly unilateral
Ancillaryndings Lymphadenopathy
(CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; T1WI: T1-weighted image; T2WI: T2-weighted image; CEMR: Contrast enhanced MRI)
• Extensive
• Isodense to muscle
• Sclerosis absent
• Erosive changes more extensive
• Certainareas,e.g.infratemporal
surface in case of maxillary sinus
erodedinmalignancy,butnotin
sinusitis
• T1WI: Hypointense
• T2WI: Intermediate
(higher than T1WI)
CEMR: Solid enhancement ± necrosis
REFERENCES
1. Broderick DF. e opacied paranasal sinus: Approach and dierential. Appl Radiol. 2015;44:9-17.
2. Mafee MF, Tran BH, Chapa AR. Imaging of rhinosinusitis and its complications: plain lm, CT, and MRI. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006;30:165-85.
3. Sen S, Chandra A, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Sinonasal tumors: Computed tomo­graphy and MR imaging features. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2015;25:595-618.
4. Whyte A, Chapeikin G. Opaque maxillary antrum: A pictorial review. Australas Radiol. 2005;49:203-13.
5. Sen S, Chandra A, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Imaging approach to sinonasal neo plasms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2015;25:577-93.
6. Connor SE. e Skull Base in the Evaluation of Sinonasal Disease: Role of Com puted Tomography and MR Imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2015;25:619-51.
7. Hur J, Kim JK, Byun JS, et al. Imaging characteristics of sinonasal organized hematoma. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(8):955-9.
8. Das A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, et al. Can diusion weighted imaging aid in dierentiating benign from malignant sinonasal masses?: A Useful Adjunct. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:345-55.
9. Das A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, et al. Benign neck masses showing restricted diu­sion: Is there a histological basis for discordant behavior? World J Radiol. 2016;8 (2):174 82.