Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4416_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
68 Мб
Скачать
Section 4 Trauma234
A
C
E
Figs. 17.22A to F
B
D
F
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE IN A REPORTING FORMAT
Structures Involved
Table 17.6
Frontal sinus
- Anterior table
- Posterior table
 Sinus oor
- Frontonasal duct
 Sinus opacication
Sinus expansion
Ethmoid sinus and bone
- Sinus septae
- Cribriform plate Fovea ethmoidalis
Orbit
 Medial wall (lamina
papyracea)
- Lateral wall
- Roof
- Floor
- Optic canal
 Superior orbital ssure Inferior orbital ssure
Maxillary sinus
- Anterior wall
- Roof
- Posteromedial wall Posterolateral wall
Pterygoid plates Pterygopalatine fossa
(N: Normal; F: Fracture; if displaced add D; O: Obstructed).
RT LT
N N
N N N N N N
N N N N
N N N N N N
F N
F N N N F N N N N N N N
O F N F N N N F N
N N N N
Sphenoid sinus
- Anterior wall
- Roof Posterior wall
Zygomatic bone
- Arch
 Zygomaticomaxillary suture
Mandible
 Condyle
- Ramus
Symphysis menti
Nasal cavity  Turbinates (superior,
middle, inferior)
- Nasal septum Nasal bone
Intracranial complications None
235Chapter 17 Imaging in Sinonasal Trauma
RT LT
N N N N N N
N N F N
N N N N N N
N N
N N
REFERENCES
1. Winegar BA, Murillo H, Tantiwongkosi B. Spectrum of critical imaging ndings in complex facial skeletal trauma. Radiographics. 2013;33(1):3-19.
2. Avery LL, Susarla SM, Novelline RA. Multidetector and three-dimensional CT evaluation of the patient with maxillofacial injury. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011;49(1):183-203.
3. Markowitz BL, Manson PN. Panfacial fractures: organization of treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16(1):105-14.
18
CHAPTER
Imaging of
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks
Atin Kumar, Ajay Garg
• Introduction
• Clinical and Laboratory Workup
• Clinical Course
• Role of Imaging
• Imaging Modalities
– Plain High-resolution Computed
Tomography Skull Base
Role Technique Findings Pitfall
– Computed Tomography
Cisternography
Role Technique Findings Pitfalls Disadvantages
– Magnetic Resonance
Cisternography (Plain)
Role Technique Findings Pitfalls
– Contrast Magnetic Resonance
Cisternography
Role Technique Findings Advantages Pitfall
– Radionuclide Cisternography
• Etiology
– Accidental Trauma – Iatrogenic Trauma – Secondary Leaks – Spontaneous Leaks
• Protocol for Evaluation
INTRODUCTION
Cerebrospinal uid (CSF) leak or stula is an abnormal communication of the sterile subarachnoid space with the sinonasal, sphenoid or tympanomastoid cavities caused by the presence of both an osseous and a dural defect.
It presents clinically with rhinorrhea or otorrhea.
It may allow the ora of the sinonasal cavity or the middle ear to spread to the intracranial compartment and lead to meningitis.
Hence, it requires an early diagnosis and timely repair.
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY WORKUP
Rule out other causes of nasal discharge such as allergic rhinitis, polyps, sinusitis or tumors.
Biochemical examination of uid for beta-2 transferrin levels which is a highly specic protein for CSF. If facility for testing is not available, then indirect method of conrmation of CSF is by evaluation of glucose and protein levels.
CLINICAL COURSE
Most of the acute leaks resolve spontaneously with conservative manage­ment, sometimes aided by decreasing CSF pressure by a lumbar or external ventricular drain.
Surgery required for nonhealing, long duration leaks (usually more than 7–10 days) or for associated conditions
Imaging required as a preclude for surgery.
ROLE OF IMAGING
To localize the exact site of the leak.
To diagnose any associated condition such as a tumor or encephalocele.
To provide a roadmap for surgery.
237Chapter 18 Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks
IMAGING MODALITIES
Plain High-resolution Computed Tomography Skull Base (Figs. 18.1A and B)
Role
is is the rst line of imaging and has an excellent accuracy with a sensitivity of 84–95%.
Best investigation to exactly delineate the defect as well as the surgical anatomy for planning and guidance.
Can be done even when the patient is not actively leaking.
Technique
High-resolution thin sections through the face and skull base including the mastoids in supine position.
Multiplanar reformats done in coronal and sagittal plane.
Findings
Detects site of bony defect or fractures.
Indirect signs include pneumocephalus, meningoencephaloceles and uid in paranasal sinuses just beneath the site of defects.
Pitfall
e bony defect detected may not be associated with a dural defect.
Section 4 Trauma238
A B
Figs. 18.1A and B: Normal high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) skull base.
Coronal reformatted CT image (A) (magnied in B) shows cribriform plates (dotted arrows) are joined to the roof of ethmoids (fovea ethmoidalis) (white arrows) by a thin bone of lateral
lamella.
Computed Tomography Cisternography (CT Cisternography)
Role
It is the most accurate method for investigation of active CSF leak with a sensitivity of 72–81% for detection of leaks.
It is done when the patient is having an active leak.
Considered as a gold standard.
Done in cases where there are multiple fractures.
Technique
Cotton pledgets are placed in both nostrils of the patient.
Take initial precontrast thin section multidetector computed tomography. (MDCT) in prone position.
Perform lumbar puncture with adequate sterile precautions.
Instill 10 mL of iodinated nonionic contrast (Iohexol) under uoroscopic guidance.
Keep the patient in reverse Trendelenburg position for 15 minutes to allow the contrast to reach cranium and distribute freely.
Obtain thin sections computed tomography (CT) of skull base in coronal plane with patient lying prone (Figs. 18.2A and B).
Findings
Cerebrospinal uid leaks are seen as areas of contrast pooling in the paranasal sinuses or nasal cavity adjacent to the site of defect.
Often the direct contrast column is seen extending through the bony defect.
Can measure Hounseld unit values in suspected regions and compare with precontrast images–a 2-fold increase in attenuation conrms the leak.
A B
Figs. 18.2A and B: Normal CT cisternography. (A) Coronal and (B) Sagittal reformatted
images. The contrast is seen to opacify the sulcal spaces within the intracranial compartment with intact base of skull. No contrast is seen to leak into the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses.
If doubtful, repeat localized section with change in patient position. e contrast will change in position.
If high ow leak is present, the intracranial contrast may show a washout in the ipsilateral compartment.
Change in position of contrast with change in patient position
Soue eect.
239Chapter 18 Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks
Pitfalls
Low ow stulas or thin hairline fractures may not be demonstrated due to higher viscosity of contrast.
Inadequate contrast distribution in region of interest either due to improper technique or adhesions in subarachnoid space secondary to bleed.
Dicult to appreciate small amount of dilute contrast medium adjacent to a surrounding bony structure or sometimes highly dense contrast which mimics bone.
Disadvantages
High radiation.
Risks associated with lumbar puncture.
Adverse reactions to contrast.
Magnetic Resonance Cisternography (Plain) (MR Cisternography) (Fig. 18.3A)
Role
A nonradiating and noninvasive method with a sensitivity of 94% for detecting leaks.
Section 4 Trauma240
It is good for characterization of the contents of the leak–can diagnose meningoencephaloceles by detecting meninges and brain tissue within. Intravenous contrast can be helpful for seeing dural enhancement in case of suspected meningoencephalocele.
Technique
Predominantly utilizes heavily T2-weighted 3D sequences [constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) or driven equilibrium (DRIVE) or fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA)]
Done in prone position.
Findings
Detects leak as a hyperintense signal intensity within the paranasal sinuses in continuation with CSF with an overlying defect at the bone­dura interface.
e signal of the leak is matching that of the CSF. e signal of uid due to rhinosinusitis, if present, is usually slightly less hyperintense and does not parallel that of CSF.
Herniation of brain content can also be detected.
Pitfalls
Indirect method of detecting leaks as uid intensity in the sinuses is presumed to be of CSF.
Sometimes dicult to dierentiate from secretions in sinuses.
Contrast Magnetic Resonance Cisternography (Fig.18.3B)
Role
is is performed with intrathecal administration of MR contrast agent and has a sensitivity close to 100% for high-ow leaks.
Used as a problem solving tool as o-label use of gadolinium contrast.
Technique
About 0.5–1 mL of intrathecal gadolinium contrast (Gd-DTPA) injected after lumbar puncture followed by same positional maneuvers as in CT cisternography.
Magnetic resonance (MR) is typically done after an hour of intrathecal contrast administration. However, the window for imaging is reported to be up to 24 hours.
T1-weighted 3D sequence is obtained in coronal plane with patient lying prone.
Findings
Shows CSF leaks as continuous column of hyperintense signal CSF on T1 image from intracranial compartment to within the paranasal sinuses through the defect in bone-dura interface.
A B
Figs. 18.3A and B: (A) Normal plain magnetic resonance cisternography; and (B) Con trast
magnetic resonance cisternography. Coronal reformatted images. The constructive
interference in steady-state (CISS) sequence shows: (A) the hyperintense cerebrospinal uid
in sulcal spaces limited to the intracranial compartment. In the contrast study (B) gadolinium
is seen to opacify the sulcal spaces within the intracranial compartment with intact base of skull on this T1 weighted coronal MR image. No contrast is seen to leak into the nasal cavity
or paranasal sinuses.
241Chapter 18 Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks
Advantages
Nonradiating
Better than plain MR cisternography for detection.
Lower dosage and better CSF distribution of contrast compared to CT cisternography.
Contrast stays longer in CSF. Hence, imaging can be done up to 24 hours–helps to detect intermittent leaks.
Pitfall
Safety of the intrathecal contrast not well established–not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for potential risk of neurotoxicity. However, many European studies have shown no signicant adverse eects with o-label use.
Radionuclide Cisternography
Performed after intrathecal administration of technitium-99 labeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA).
e radioactivity is measured after 24–48 hours in the pledgets placed in the nasal cavity for conrming presence of CSF leak.
More helpful for conrming presence of CSF leak and not so good for detection of site of leak.
Rarely used now in clinical practice.
Section 4 Trauma242
ETIOLOGY
e numerous causes of CSF rhinorrhea are:
Trauma: accidental or iatrogenic
Secondary leaks
• Tumor related
• Congenital defects
• Postradiation or chemotherapy
Spontaneous leaks.
Accidental Trauma (Figs. 18.4 to 18.6)
It is the most common etiology seen in 10–30% of all skull base fractures.
e patients present early within the rst few days.
Most common sites—cribriform plates, ethmoid roof, frontal sinus, sphenoid sinus, tegmen tympani.
Cerebrospinal uid may leak into the sinonasal cavity (in frontobasal fractures) or into the middle ear cavity and mastoid air cells (in temporal bone trauma).
Acute CSF rhinorrhea (80%) or otorrhea is the usual clinical presentation.
Most posttraumatic CSF leaks heal spontaneously with conservative management.
Meningitis may be seen in up to 50% of cases, if the leak does not resolve spontaneously or is not repaired.
Persistent leaks for longer than 7–10 days, in spite of CSF diversion, require intracranial or endoscopic repair.
Larger skull base defects (>1.5 cm) or severely comminuted fractures, with meningoencephalocele, also require surgical repair.
A B
Figs. 18.4A and B: Fracture anterior skull base. (A) Coronal and (B) Sagittal reformatted
high-resolution computed tomography skull base images in an 18-year-old male with road trafc injury shows a bony defect at the right ethmoid roof (arrows) with uid density seen in
ethmoid sinus just beneath the defect.
243Chapter 18 Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks
A
B
C
Figs. 18.5A to D: Traumatic cerebrospinal uid rhinorrhea. (A and B) CT cisternography––
bony defect at the left ethmoid roof with contrast column extending from intracranial compartment to the ethmoid sinus; (C and D) Contrast MR cisternography––conrms the ndings of CT.
D