Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4372_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
94 Мб
Скачать
25 Lip Reconstruction withLocal Flaps
https://t.me/med1917
235
25.6.1 Defects ofuptoOne-Third oftheLip
Width
In the vast majority of cases, up to one-third of the lower lip can be removed by simple wedge excision (Fig.25.6) and the resultant defect is then closed primarily in layers. In elderly patients, with greater tissue laxity, this is never a problem (Fig.25.7).
In a minority of cases, the wedge may have to be modied by extending the incision unilaterally or bilaterally along the labiomental fold and excising skin crescents. This technique aids in advancing the remaining lip centrally. When the cres­cents are bilaterally extended as far as the mandibular border, accompanied by mucosal release incisions, the technique is known as the Schuchardt procedure.
25.6.2 Defects ofOne-Third toOne-Half
oftheLip Width
Rarely, in some elderly patients with lax tissues, it may be possible to primarily close wedge excisions greater than one­third of the width of the lower lip. In the vast majority of cases, however, reconstruction of between one-third and
one-half of the lower lip is best performed by using residual lip tissues, or lip sharing. Such techniques preserve lip func­tion and have satisfactory aesthetic results, but they can cause microstomia. Arguably the best lip-sharing technique is the Karapandzic procedure [11]. This elegant rotation- advancement technique can be used on both lateral and cen­tral lower lip defects, and sometimes upper lip defects. A unilateral ap can sufce for lateral defects, but bilateral aps are required for central defects.
The Karapandzic technique (Figs.25.8, 25.9, and 25.10) creates paired full-thickness mucomusculocutaneous lip aps supplied by branches of the facial artery, and it pre­serves the sensory and motor nerves to the lip segments. It is crucial that the skin incisions are made at a distance from the lip margin equivalent to the height of the lip defect, espe­cially at the commissures, in order to restore normal lip height. It should be noted that the superior incisions are nor­mally placed lateral to the nasolabial creases for this purpose. The mucosal incisions are parallel to the skin incisions but are much shorter, usually about 2cm on each side. For cen­tral lower lip defects, the lip depressor muscles must be com­pletely divided bilaterally to allow the aps to move medially. For large defects, the superior incisions are deepened through skin, fat, and the supercial layer of facial muscles, preserv-
1
3
Fig. 25.6 Defects of up to one-third of the lower lip can be closed with various wedge techniques (1–3) or bilateral advancement aps (4)
2
4
236
https://t.me/med1917
R. Chalmers and O. A. Ahmed
ab
Fig. 25.7 (a) Modied wedge excision of lower lip squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in an elderly patient. (b) Closure of wedge excision
1
2
Fig. 25.8 Karapandzic technique: (1) Mark out the excision margin and ap. The ap should be the same height as the lip at all points around the ap. (2) After full-thickness excision (including mucosa), mobilise the crescenteric aps at equidistance from the free lip margin
ing only the buccinator and orbicularis oris. During this manoeuvre, the delicate vessels and nerves to the lip must be carefully preserved. It is important to note that the nerves enter the aps radially. After ap rotation, the supercial muscle layer should be reattached to the orbicularis. For rela­tively small defects, It is possible to rotate the aps without necessarily dividing the supercial facial muscles; instead, the muscles in the superior incisions can simply be teased until the aps are free to advance—the “cut as you go” approach. After ap rotation, the wounds are closed in layers from within outwards, paying careful attention to the muscle layer. The functional results of this reconstruction are very good, but microstomia is inevitable with large defects.
2
and full thickness for 2cm from the postexcisional defect. With scis­sors, the blood and nerve supply around the commissure is preserved. (3) Tension-free rotation of the aps recreates the lower lip and vermilion
3
Defects of the lower lip not involving the commissure can be reconstructed by a “reversed” Abbe-Sabattini ap from the upper lip (Fig.25.11). To avoid excessive shortening of the upper lip and to evenly distribute tissues between the upper and lower lips, the ap should be half the width of the lip defect. These aps do lead to an insensate, adynamic seg­ment of lip; though a degree of reinnervation eventually occurs, they are better suited for upper lip reconstruction. Their main advantage is that they do not blunt the oral commissures.
ab
cd
25 Lip Reconstruction withLocal Flaps
https://t.me/med1917
237
Fig. 25.9 (a) Markings for resection of SCC of the right side of the lower lip, and design of a left-sided Karapandzic ap. (b) Karapandzic ap assessed for adequate mobilisation. (c) Karapandzic ap inset. (d) Good aesthetic and functional result
25.6.3 Defects Greater Than One-Half oftheLip Width
to use adjacent cheek tissues. Such reconstructions can achieve satisfactory aesthetic results, but function is always suboptimal.
For larger defects, lip-sharing procedures such as the Karapandzic lip reconstruction can be used when tissue lax­ity allows. This technique preserves lip function, but a degree of microstomia will inevitably occur and secondary revision is usually required. When the lip defect is greater than three quarters, there will usually be insufcient lip tissue for a sat­isfactory reconstruction. In such cases, the next best option is
The Bernard-von Burow procedure (Fig. 25.12) recon- structs the lower lip by medially advancing the cheeks. Cheek advancement is facilitated by the excision of full­thickness triangles of cheek tissue above and below the defect at the nasolabial fold. The width of the triangular exci­sion is equal to the width of the defect. When both cheeks are advanced, the base of each triangle is half the width of the lip
238
ab
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 25.10 (a) SCC of central lower lip and design of bilateral Karapandzic aps. Note that the width of the aps is equivalent to or greater than the height of the lip defect throughout. (b) Bilateral Karapandzic aps inset
R. Chalmers and O. A. Ahmed
2
1
Fig. 25.11 Reversed Abbe-Sabattini ap to for a lesion of one-third of the lower lip. (1) Lesion marked out for excision. (2) Flap design. (3) Full-thickness incision of the upper lip ap, with the medial free margin
4
5
3
of the upper lip inserted in the lateral margin of the lower lip excision. (4) Donor site closure. (5) The pedicle can be divided and inset at 14days
2
1
3
45
Fig. 25.12 Modied Bernard-von Burow technique for up to total lip reconstruction. (1) Lesion marked out and ap marked out with two superior and two inferior Burow’s triangles. (2) Burow’s triangles are excised into subcutaneous tissue lateral to nasolabial folds. (3) Around
the labiomental fold, Burow’s triangles are excised to allow medial rotation of the lower cheek aps. (4) Medial advancement of the cheek aps. (5) 3-layered closure of the midline with a mucosal ap recon­struction of the vermilion
25 Lip Reconstruction withLocal Flaps
https://t.me/med1917
239
1
Fig. 25.13 Unilateral Freeman modication of the Bernard-von Burow procedure. (1) Mark out excision margin and lateral nasolabial triangle. (2) Advance lower lip into defect. (3) Excision of tissue super-
3
defect. Tongue aps reconstruct the vermilion. Webster’s modication of this technique mobilises cheek mucosa to reconstruct the vermilion.
The Freeman modication of the Bernard-von Burow operation is probably the best current cheek advancement technique (Fig.25.13). Freeman converted the lower incision of the Bernard-von Burow operation from a horizontal one to a curved one, following the labiomental crease. Only skin and fat are removed in the triangular excisions, in contrast to
2
4
cial to the muscle will allow medial advancement, whilst incision of the muscle lateral to the commissure will facilitate a commissuroplasty
the full-thickness tissue excision of the older procedure. Bilateral cheek advancements can be used for total lower lip reconstruction, but there can be signicant facial scarring. For the best function, it is important to reconstruct the orbi­cularis muscle.
An alternative for total or subtotal lip reconstruction is to combine unilateral cheek advancement with a contralateral Karapandzic aps (Fig.25.14).
240
a
b
https://t.me/med1917
c
R. Chalmers and O. A. Ahmed
Fig. 25.14 Combined unilateral cheek advancement with a contralateral Karapandzic ap. (a) Subtotal defect of the lower lip, with left cheek advancement performed and right Karapandzic ap designed. (b) Intraoperative appearance. (c) Immediate postoperative appearance
References
1. Sushruta. An English translation of the Sushruta Samhita, based on original Sanskrit text. Edited and published by Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna.
2. Dieffenbach JF.Chirurgische Erfahrungen Series 3. 1834;4:101.
3. Sabattini P.Cenno storico dell’origene e progressi della rinoplastica e cheiloplastica. Bologna: Bella Arti; 1938.
4. Abbe R.A new plastic operation for the relief of deformity due to double harelip. Med Records N Y. 1898;53:477.
5. Estlander JA.En method att fran den ena lappen fylla substans­forluster i den andran och i kinden. Nord Med Archiv. 1872;4:1–12.
6. von Burow CA.Beschreibung einer neuen Trasplantations-Method (Method der seitlichen Dreiecke) zum Wiederersatz verlorengegan­gener Teile des Gesichts. Berlin, Germany: Nauk; 1855.
7. Bernard C. Cancer de la lèvre inférieure: restauration à l’aide de lambeaux quadrilataires-latéreaux. Querison. 1852;5:162–4.
8. Freeman BS.Myoplastic modication of the Bernard cheiloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1958;21:453–60.
9. Webster RC, Coffey RJ, Kelleher RE.Total and partial reconstruc­tion of the lower lip with innervated muscle-bearing aps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;25:360.
10. McGregor IA. Reconstruction of the lower lip. Br J Plast Surg. 1983;36:40–7.
11. Karapandzic M.Reconstruction of lip defects by local arterial ap. Br J Plast Surg. 1974;27:93–7.
12. Harii K, Ohmori K, Ohmori S.Utilization of free composite tissue transfer by microvascular anastomoses for the repair of burn defor­mities. Burns. 1975;1:237–44.
13. Webster JP.Crescentic peri-alar cheek excision for upper lip ap advancement with a short history of upper lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;16:434.
Part X
https://t.me/med1917
Oral Cavity Surgery
Transoral Partial Glossectomy
https://t.me/med1917
ArpanTahim andZaidSadiq
26
26.1 Introduction
Transoral partial glossectomy is a key intervention in the sur­gical management of tongue cancer. Although there is con­siderable overlap in terminology, the term partial glossectomy typically refers to a procedure in which no more than one­third of the tongue is removed. When between a third to half of tongue tissue is removed, the term hemiglossectomy is more appropriate; subtotal glossectomy and total glossec- tomy refer to the removal of even greater proportions of the tongue. For many early, small cancers, a through-the-mouth (transoral) approach is sufcient, but depending on lesion site and size, greater access can be obtained via different oral and extraoral approaches such as a lip split or mandibulot­omy, or via the neck. This chapter discusses transoral partial glossectomy, exploring its indications, reviewing established
and newer surgical techniques, and discussing postoperative functional recovery.
26.2 Indications
The tongue has an embryologically and anatomically complex structure. It begins to develop in the fourth week of life from the oor of the primitive pharynx. Its anterior two thirds arises with the fusion, in the midline, of protrusions from the rst pharyn­geal arches. The posterior portion arises from the third and fourth pharyngeal arches. These embryonic origins go some way to explain its vascular and nerve supply. It is important to note that it is tumours affecting the anterior and anterior lateral tongue that are largely amenable to treatment via transoral approaches, as they are appropriately accessible (Fig.26.1).
A. Tahim (*) Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, UK e-mail: arpan.tahim.17@ucl.ac.uk; a.tahim@nhs.net
Z. Sadiq Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK e-mail: zaidsadiq@nhs.net
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Simo et al. (eds.), Atlas of Head and Neck Surgery, Springer Surgery Atlas Series,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36593-5_26
243
244
or longitudinal
Anterior mandible
https://t.me/med1917
A. Tahim and Z. Sadiq
a b
Fig. 26.1 (a) An early left lateral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. (b) An anterior tongue squamous cell carcinoma affecting the entirety of the right tongue
Fig. 26.2 The intrinsic and extrinsic tongue musculature
Styloglossus
Palatoglossus
Superi muscles
Ver ticalis and transversus muscles
Inferior longitudinal muscles
Posterior mandible (cut)
Genioglossus (cut anteriorly)
Hyoglossus (cut)
The tongue consists of squamous epithelium overlying a complicated, dynamic muscular complex suspended from the lingual aspect of the mandible, the hyoid bone, and the styloid
Hyoid bone
process. There are four pairs of intrinsic muscles, with no bony origins (Fig. 26.2). Inferior and superior longitudinal muscles work to move the tip of the tongue up and down.
Submandi
ght arch
26 Transoral Partial Glossectomy
https://t.me/med1917
245
Sandwiched between these muscles lie the transversus mus­cle, which narrows and lengthens the tongue, and the verticalis muscle, which attens the tongue. Extrinsic tongue muscles include the genioglossus, which protrudes the tongue, and the hyoglossus, which depresses it. The styloglossus and palato­glossus muscles elevate and retract the tongue.
The tongue has a rich vascular system, supplied predomi­nantly from lingual arteries. The lingual artery passes medial to the hypoglossal nerve, between the hyoglossus and genio­glossus. It then travels submucosally with accompanying veins and the lingual nerve on the undersurface of the ante­rior tongue towards the tongue tip. The lingual nerve runs anteriorly along the inner aspect of the mandible, typically close to the lower third molars (Fig. 26.3). There is wide variation in its described course, but recent cadaveric studies suggest that it lies lateral to the submandibular duct at the distal molars. In the region of the second molar, it changes course to move medially into the oor of the mouth and crosses inferior to the submandibular duct. It then moves upwards and anteriorly, now medial to the submandibular duct, into the body of the anterior tongue, giving off several smaller terminal branches [1].
Squamous cell carcinoma is by far the commonest type of tongue cancer. It can present at the lateral border in approxi­mately 80% of cases, the dorsal surface in 6%, the ventral surface in 5%, and the posterior/base of the tongue in up to 8% [2, 3]. Lesions on the ventral surface of the tongue may
be difcult to differentiate from oor-of-mouth tumours, especially in the glossotonsillar fossa. When planning sur­gery, this differentiation is highly relevant and can impact speech and swallowing after resective surgery. Regardless of the location, appropriate clinical visualization of any lesion is vital, requiring good lighting and an unobstructed view. Although straightforward in anterior tongue lesions, lesions affecting the posterior third of the tongue may require exi­ble nasendoscopic assessment.
As with most oral cavity cancer, the key risk factors are smoking and high alcohol intake, but viral aetiologies are increasingly being implicated, particularly in the posterior tongue of younger patients. In keeping with oncological principles, tongue cancers should be staged based on size and depth of invasion, the presence of neck metastasis, and evidence of distant spread, with management discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting.
Typical staging involves clinical assessment, with xity of the tongue or ear pain strongly suggestive of advanced local disease. Further evaluation can be done with three dimensional cross-sectional imaging, although intraoral ultrasound scanning is increasingly seen as a useful adjunct to characterize local tumour characteristics such as depth of invasion [4]. Nodal spread is best evaluated using ultraso­nography, with particular attention paid to the lymph node basins where anterior tongue tumours most commonly spread: levels IIA (37.1%), III (20.9%), and 1B (13.5%) [5].
Outline of overlying mandible as seen from the right side
Styloglossus
Lingual nerve
bular
gland (cut)
Hyoid bone
Fig. 26.3 The relationship of the right lingual nerve, Wharton’s duct, and the overlying oral cavity landscape. The nerve lies lateral to the duct in the region of the distal molars before passing inferior to it in the
Tongue surface
Te rminal branches of the lingual nerve
Overlying dentition in the lower ri
Submandibular duct (opening into the floor of mouth)
Hyoglossus
Geniohyoid
region of the lower second molars, prior to entering the body of the anterior tongue