Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5759_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
93 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 35 The Fetal Spine 1267
CAUSES OF SCOLIOSIS OR KYPHOSIS
Hemivertebrae Butterfly vertebrae Block vertebrae Spina bifida Ventral abdominal wall defects Limb–body wall complex Amniotic band syndrome Arthrogryposis Skeletal dysplasias VACTERL* association Caudal regression syndrome
*Vertebral abnormalities, anal atresia, cardiac abnormalities, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal agenesis, and limb defects.
Possible associated anomalies must then be sought because prognosis depends on the coexistent anomalies.
A hemivertebra represents underdevelopment or nondevelopment of one half of a vertebral body; that is, one of the two early chondrification centers is deficient. The remaining ossification center is displaced laterally with respect to the vertebrae above and below it, leading to a short-segment mild scoliosis. The abnormalities can be detected prenatally and may be best portrayed with 3-D ultrasound.
30-33
Fetuses with an isolated hemiverte­bra have an excellent prognosis, whereas those with other fetal anomalies (e.g., Potter’s syndrome; cardiac, intesti­nal, intracranial, and limb anomalies) have a poor prog-
107
nosis. survival to approximately 50%. If oligohydramnios is also present, the mortality approaches 100%.
The presence of associated anomalies reduces
108
SACRAL AGENESIS
Sacral agenesis is an uncommon fetal abnormality that may be present in conditions such as caudal regression
sequence, sirenomelia sequence, cloacal exstrophy sequence, and the VACTERL association (vertebral
abnormalities, anal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal dysplasia, and limb defects). The caudal regression sequence (caudal regression syndrome) and the sireno­melia sequence are thought to be separate pathologic entities.
109,110
CAUDAL REGRESSION
In caudal regression or dysplasia, abnormalities of the lower spine and limbs occur, including sacral agenesis,
lumbar spine deficiency, and leg anomalies such as femoral hypoplasia (Fig. 35-20). Defects of the neural
tube and the genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and cardiac
systems are common. Occurrence is sporadic; caudal regression is more common in infants of mothers with diabetes mellitus. The etiology is not established. Sonog­raphy can demonstrate absence of the sacrum and short­ened femurs. The legs can be flexed and abducted at the hips, and there may be clubfoot. Sonography may detect associated urinary anomalies (renal agenesis, cystic dys­plasia, caliectasis) and gastrointestinal abnormalities (e.g., duodenal atresia).
111
The prognosis depends on the severity and extent of the skeletal abnormalities and asso­ciated anomalies. In sacral agenesis with no internal organ involvement, there are usually deficits in the legs and deficient control of bladder and bowel functions. In infants with internal organ involvement, the prognosis is related to these defects.
SIRENOMELIA
Sirenomelia sequence is a rare disorder in which the legs are fused and the feet are deformed or absent
35-21). The cause is probably an aberrant fetal artery
that branches from the upper abdominal aorta and passes into the umbilical cord to the placenta.
113
flow bypasses the lower fetal body. The distal abdominal aorta, the aorta’s distal branches, and subtended struc­tures are small and underdeveloped. This leads to mal­formations of spine, legs, kidneys, gut, and genitalia. Normally the umbilical arteries, which arise from the fetal iliac arteries, carry blood from the fetus into the umbilical cord and then into the placenta.
At sonography, there is advanced oligohydramnios because of reduced or absent renal function. The legs are fused, or there is a single leg. The feet are absent, or there may be a single foot. There may be sacral agenesis, defi­ciency of the lower lumbar spine, and thoracic anoma­lies. These findings may be difficult to appreciate because of the advanced oligohydramnios or anhydramnios. The prolonged anhydramnios causes pulmonary hypo­plasia, which is usually fatal. The risk of recurrence is the same as in the general population.
112
(Fig.
Arterial blood
109
SACROCOCCYGEAL TERATOMA
Fetal teratomas may arise from the sacrum or coccyx, from other midline structures from the level of the brain to the coccyx, or from the gonads. teratomas arise from the pluripotent cells of Hensen’s node located anterior to the coccyx. Sacrococcygeal teratomas contain all three germ layers (ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm) and thus may contain ele­ments of many tissues, including neural, respiratory, and gastrointestinal. Sacrococcygeal tumor is rare (1:35,000
115
births)
but the most common tumor of neonates. Females are affected four times more frequently than males. Sacrococcygeal teratomas are classified into four
114
Sacrococcygeal
1268 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
BA
DC
FIGURE 35-20. Caudal regression. A, Sagittal sonogram of spine at 21 weeks shows abrupt termination of ossified vertebral
bodies. B, Transverse view of pelvis with legs in long axis shows lack of ossified pelvic bones and atrophic musculature about the lower extremities. C, Transverse color Doppler image at level of bladder shows lack of ossified pelvic bones. D, In a different fetal specimen, radiograph shows abrupt termination (arrows) of the lumbar spine and absence of the sacrum. The pelvic bones are small and deformed.
F
A B C
FIGURE 35-21 Sirenomelia. A, Sagittal view of fetus at 12 weeks’ gestation shows unusual angulation of lower extremity. B, Long-
axis view of a single lower extremity. C, In a different fetus, radiograph shows single femur (F) and single tibia (T). Note the segmented defects in the vertebrae of the thoracic and lumbar spine (arrows).
T
Chapter 35 The Fetal Spine 1269
B
SCT
S
A B
FIGURE 35-22. Sacrococcygeal teratoma. A, Sagittal sonogram shows type II sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) that is predomi-
nantly external but has a substantial intrapelvic component. The tumor extends up to level L5 and displaces the fetal urinary bladder (B) anteriorly. Note the calcifications (arrows) within the tumor. B, T2-weighted sagittal MR image demonstrates the extent and internal structure of the sacrococcygeal tumor (SCT); S, stomach. C, Lateral radiograph in a different neonate. (A and B courtesy Drs. Fong, Pantazi,
and Toi, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto.)
TYPES OF SACROCOCCYGEAL
SCT
SCT
C
PRESACRAL MASSES
TERATOMAS
Sacrococcygeal teratoma
Type I (47%): external mass predominant Type II (34%): external mass with significant
internal component
Type III (9%): internal mass predominant, with
smaller external component
Type IV (10%): presacral mass only
Chordoma Anterior myelomeningocele Neurenteric cyst Neuroblastoma Sarcoma Lipoma Bone tumor Lymphoma Rectal duplication
115
types:
type I, tumor predominantly external with only minimal presacral involvement; type II, tumor present­ing externally but with significant intrapelvic extension; type III, tumor apparent externally but with predomi­nant pelvic mass and extension into the abdomen; type IV, tumor presacral with no external presentation (Fig.
114
35-22).
At birth, 75% of sacrococcygeal teratomas are benign, 12% are immature, and 13% are malignant. Because malignant potential increases with the age of the infant, surgery must be performed shortly after birth.
Sonography usually demonstrates a mass in the rump or buttocks area adjacent to the spine
116
(Video 35-2).
Most teratomas (85%) are either solid or mixed (solid + cystic); 15% are mostly cystic, which is a benign sign. Calcifications are frequently present. Large masses may displace and distort neighboring structures, such as the rectum and urinary bladder (see Fig. 35-21). Compres­sion of the distal ureters may cause hydronephrosis. Larger solid tumors may develop substantial
venous shunting causing fetal cardiac failure and hydrops.
117
The development of hydrops in the presence
arterio-
of a sacrococcygeal teratoma carries a poor prognosis,
and these findings should precipitate a cesarean section for fetal salvage.
117-121
PRESACRAL FETAL MASS
The differential diagnosis of a presacral fetal mass also includes chordoma, anterior myelomeningocele, neuren­teric cyst, neuroblastoma, sarcoma, lipoma, bone tumor, lymphoma, and rectal duplication. Amniotic fluid AFP is often elevated in sacrococcygeal tumor, and AChE is often present in the amniotic fluid. These results exclude most other etiologies, except a myelomeningocele.
If a fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma is suspected from prenatal sonograms, serial sonograms should be arranged to monitor the pregnancy to assess for complications, especially signs of fetal cardiac failure. Complete fetal assessment should also include the internal characteris­tics of the tumor, the size of the tumor, and associated fetal anomalies.
For masses less than 4.5 cm diameter, without associ­ated abnormalities, elective vaginal delivery is recom­mended. For masses greater than 4.5 cm diameter,
1270 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
elective cesarean section may be advisable because of the risk of dystocia and hemorrhage during vaginal delivery. In utero surgery for arteriovenous shunting has been described for treatment of fetal hydrops from congestive heart failure in early pregnancy (<30 weeks), but this should be considered only in experienced hands.
117,118
References
1. Fishman MA. Birth defects and supplemental vitamins. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2000;2:117-122.
2. Shaer CM, Chescheir N, Schulkin J. Myelomeningocele: a review of the epidemiology, genetics, risk factors for conception, prenatal diag­nosis, and prognosis for affected individuals. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007;62:471-479.
3. Grosse SD, Collins JS. Folic acid supplementation and neural tube defect recurrence prevention. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2007;79:737-742.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Trends in folic acid supplement intake among women of reproductive age—California, 2002-2006. MMWR 2007;56:1106-1109.
5. Solomons NW. Food fortification with folic acid: has the other shoe dropped? Nutr Rev 2007;65:512-515.
6. De Wals P, Tairou F, van Allen MI, et al. Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med 2007;357:135-142.
7. Safdar OY, Al-Dabbagh AA, Abuelieneen WA, Kari JA. Decline in the incidence of neural tube defects after the national fortification of flour (1997-2005). Saudi Med J 2007;28:1227-1229.
8. Sayed AR, Bourne D, Pattinson R, et al. Decline in the prevalence of neural tube defects following folic acid fortification and its cost­benefit in South Africa. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008;82:211-216.
9. Jentink J, van de Vrie-Hoekstra NW, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Postma MJ. Economic evaluation of folic acid food fortification in The Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 2008;18:270-274.
Developmental Anatomy
10. Larsen WJ. Human embryology. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Liv­ingstone; 1997.
11. O’Rahilly R, Muller F, Meyer DB. The human vertebral column at the end of the embryonic period proper. 1. The column as a whole. J Anat 1980;131:565-575.
12. Bagnall KM, Harris PF, Jones PR. A radiographic study of the human fetal spine. 2. The sequence of development of ossification centres in the vertebral column. J Anat 1977;124:791-802.
13. Ford DM, McFadden KD, Bagnall KM. Sequence of ossification in human vertebral neural arch centers. Anat Rec 1982;203:175-178.
14. Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, Grafe MR, Lou KV. Ossification of the fetal spine. Radiology 1991;181:561-565.
15. Braithwaite JM, Armstrong MA, Economides DL. Assessment of fetal anatomy at 12 to 13 weeks of gestation by transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:82-85.
16. Blumenfeld Z, Siegler E, Bronshtein M. The early diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:863-871.
17. Sebire NJ, Noble PL, Thorpe-Beeston JG, et al. Presence of the “lemon” sign in fetuses with spina bifida at the 10-14–week scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:403-405.
18. Bernard JP, Suarez B, Rambaud C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defect before 12 weeks’ gestation: direct and indirect ultraso­nographic semeiology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:406-
409.
19. Robbin ML, Filly RA, Goldstein RB. The normal location of the fetal conus medullaris. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13:541-546.
20. Zalel Y, Lehavi O, Aizenstein O, Achiron R. Development of the fetal spinal cord: time of ascendance of the normal conus medullaris as detected by sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1397-1401; quiz 1402-1403.
Scanning Techniques
21. Thiagarajah S, Henke J, Hogge WA, et al. Early diagnosis of spina bifida: the value of cranial ultrasound markers. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:54-57.
22. Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Barth RA, et al. Prevalence of ventricu­lomegaly in association with myelomeningocele: correlation with gestational age and severity of posterior fossa deformity. Radiology 1994;190:703-707.
23. Watson WJ, Chescheir NC, Katz VL, Seeds JW. The role of ultra­sound in evaluation of patients with elevated maternal serum alpha­fetoprotein: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:123-128.
24. Dyson RL, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:321-328.
25. Riccabona M, Johnson D, Pretorius DH, Nelson TR. Three-dimen­sional ultrasound: display modalities in the fetal spine and thorax. Eur J Radiol 1996;22:141-145.
26. Bonilla-Musoles F, Machado LE, Osborne NG, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasound in malformations of the medullary canal: report of four cases. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:622-626.
27. Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. A diagnostic approach for the evaluation of spina bifida by three-dimensional ultrasonog­raphy. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:619-626.
28. Schild RL, Wallny T, Fimmers R, Hansmann M. The size of the fetal thoracolumbar spine: a three-dimensional ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:468-472.
29. Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Riccabona M, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetal spine. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:434-438.
30. Wax JR, Watson WJ, Miller RC, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagno­sis of hemivertebrae: associations and outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1023-1027.
31. Kalache KD, Bamberg C, Proquitte H, et al. Three-dimensional multi-slice view: new prospects for evaluation of congenital anoma­lies in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1041-1049.
32. Merce LT, Barco MJ, Bau S. Three-dimensional volume sono­graphic study of fetal anatomy: intraobserver reproducibility and effect of examiner experience. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1053-
1063.
33. Gindes L, Benoit B, Pretorius DH, Achiron R. Abnormal number of fetal ribs on 3-dimensional ultrasonography: associated anomalies and outcomes in 75 fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1263-
1271.
Spina Bifida
34. Li Z, Ren A, Zhang L, et al. Extremely high prevalence of neural tube defects in a 4-county area in Shanxi Province, China. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76:237-240.
35. Cragan JD, Roberts HE, Edmonds LD, et al. Surveillance for anen­cephaly and spina bifida and the impact of prenatal diagnosis— United States, 1985-1994. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1995; 44:1-13.
36. EuroCat Working Group. Prevalence of neural tube defects in 20 regions of Europe and the impact of prenatal diagnosis, 1980-1986. J Epidemiol Community Health 1991;45:52-58.
37. Laurence KM, James N, Miller MH, et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of folate treatment before conception to prevent recurrence of neural-tube defects. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 1981; 282:1509-1511.
38. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 1991;338:131-137.
39. Werler MM, Shapiro S, Mitchell AA. Periconceptional folic acid exposure and risk of occurrent neural tube defects. JAMA 1993; 269:1257-1261.
40. Czeizel AE. Prevention of congenital abnormalities by periconcep­tional multivitamin supplementation. BMJ 1993;306:1645-1648.
41. Lumley J, Watson L, Watson M, Bower C. Periconceptional supple­mentation with folate and/or multivitamins for preventing neural tube defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD001056.
42. US Department of Health and Human Services. Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. MMWR 1992;41:1-7.
43. Expert Advisory Group: Folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defects. London: UK Department of Health; 1992.
44. Kadir RA, Sabin C, Whitlow B, et al. Neural tube defects and peri­conceptional folic acid in England and Wales: retrospective study. BMJ 1999;319:92-93.
45. Rosano A, Smithells D, Cacciani L, et al. Time trends in neural tube defects prevalence in relation to preventive strategies: an interna­tional study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:630-635.
Chapter 35 The Fetal Spine 1271
46. Sharpe G, Young G. Folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defects: most pregnant women do not take folic acid. BMJ 1995; 311:256.
47. Wild J, Sutcliffe M, Schorah CJ, Levene MI. Prevention of neural­tube defects. Lancet 1997;350:30-31.
48. Huttly WJ, Wald NJ, Walters JC. Folic acid supplementation before pregnancy remains inadequate. BMJ 1999;319:1499.
49. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, et al. Impact of folic acid fortification of the U.S. food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA 2001;285:2981-2986.
50. Persad VL, van den Hof MC, Dube JM, Zimmer P. Incidence of open neural tube defects in Nova Scotia after folic acid fortification. CMAJ 2002;167:241-245.
51. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Descriptive epidemiology of lipomyelo­meningocele, Hawaii, 1986-2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004;70:953-956.
52. De Wals P, van Allen MI, Lowry RB, et al. Impact of folic acid food fortification on the birth prevalence of lipomyelomeningocele in Canada. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008;82:106-
109.
53. Main DM, Mennuti MT. Neural tube defects: issues in prenatal diagnosis and counselling. Obstet Gynecol 1986;67:1-16.
54. Lescale KB, Eddleman KA, Chervenak FA. The fetal neck and spine. In: McGahan JP, Porto M, editors. Diagnostic obstetrical ultra­sound. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1994. p. 195.
55. Ray JG, Wyatt PR, Thompson MD, et al. Vitamin B12 and the risk of neural tube defects in a folic-acid-fortified population. Epidemiol­ogy 2007;18:362-366.
56. Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Filly RA. Prenatally detected fetal myelomeningocele: is karyotype analysis warranted? Radiology 1995;194:491-494.
57. Sepulveda W, Corral E, Ayala C, et al. Chromosomal abnorma lities in fetuses with open neural tube defects: prenatal identification with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:352-
356.
58. Byrne J, Warburton D. Neural tube defects in spontaneous abor­tions. Am J Med Genet 1986;25:327-333.
59. Gregerson DM. Clinical consequences of spina bifida occulta. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997;20:546-550.
60. Norem CT, Schoen EJ, Walton DL, et al. Routine ultrasonography compared with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein for neural tube defect screening. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:747-752.
61. Filly RA, Callen PW, Goldstein RB. Alpha-fetoprotein screening programs: what every obstetric sonologist should know. Radiology 1993;188:1-9.
62. Ames MD, Schut L. Results of treatment of 171 consecutive myelo­meningoceles, 1963 to 1968. Pediatrics 1972;50:466-470.
63. Kollias SS, Goldstein RB, Cogen PH, Filly RA. Prenatally detected myelomeningoceles: sonographic accuracy in estimation of the spinal level. Radiology 1992;185:109-112.
64. Aaronson OS, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bruner JP, et al. Myelo­meningocele: prenatal evaluation–comparison between transab­dominal ultrasound and MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:839-
843.
65. Von Koch CS, Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Barkovich AJ. Fetal mag­netic resonance imaging enhances detection of spinal cord anomalies in patients with sonographically detected bony anomalies of the spine. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:781-789.
66. Biggio Jr JR, Owen J, Wenstrom KD, Oakes WJ. Can prenatal ultrasound findings predict ambulatory status in fetuses with open spina bifida? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1016-
1020.
67. Roberts AB, Campbell H, Boreham J, et al. Fetal head measurements in spina bifida. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:927-928.
68. Wald N, Cuckle H, Boreham J, Stirrat G. Small biparietal diameter of fetuses with spina bifida: implications for antenatal screening. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:219-221.
69. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, et al. Fetal hydrocephalus: sono­graphic detection and clinical significance of associated anomalies. Radiology 1987;163:187-191.
70. Nicolaides KH, Campbell S, Gabbe SG, Guidetti R. Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs. Lancet 1986; 2:72-74.
71. Pilu G, Romero R, Reece EA, et al. Subnormal cerebellum in fetuses with spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1052-
1056.
72. Goldstein RB, Podrasky AE, Filly RA, Callen PW. Effacement of the fetal cisterna magna in association with myelomeningocele. Radiol­ogy 1989;172:409-413.
73. Benacerraf BR, Stryker J, Frigoletto Jr FD. Abnormal ultrasound appearance of the cerebellum (banana sign): indirect sign of spina bifida. Radiology 1989;171:151-153.
74. Furness ME, Barbary JE, Verco PW. A pointer to spina bifida: fetal head shape in the second trimester. In: Gill RW, Dadd MJ, editors. WFUMB (World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology). Sidney: Pergamon Press; 1985. p. 296.
75. Campbell J, Gilbert WM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs in a high-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:247-250.
76. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, Mahony BS. Abnormalities of fetal cranial contour in sonographic detection of spina bifida: evaluation of the “lemon” sign. Radiology 1988;167:387-392.
77. Penso C, Redline RW, Benacerraf BR. A sonographic sign that predicts which fetuses with hydrocephalus have an associated neural tube defect. J Ultrasound Med 1987;6:307-311.
78. Sharrard WJ. The mechanism of paralytic deformity in spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 1962;4:310-313.
79. Lorber J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele: an analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol 1971;13:279-303.
80. Nelson Jr MD, Bracchi M, Naidich TP, McLone DG. The natural history of repaired myelomeningocele. Radiographics 1988;8:695-
706.
81. Wong LY, Paulozzi LJ. Survival of infants with spina bifida: a popu­lation study, 1979-94. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:374-
378.
82. Oakeshott P, Hunt GM. Long-term outcome in open spina bifida. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:632-636.
83. Bliton MJ, Zaner RM. Over the cutting edge: how ethics consulta­tion illuminates the moral complexity of open-uterine fetal repair of spina bifida and patients’ decision making. J Clin Ethics 2001;12: 346-360.
84. Walsh DS, Adzick NS, Sutton LN, Johnson MP. The rationale for in utero repair of myelomeningocele. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16: 312-322.
85. Tulipan N, Bruner JP, Hernanz-Schulman M, et al. Effect of intra­uterine myelomeningocele repair on central nervous system structure and function. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999;31:183-188.
86. Fichter MA, Dornseifer U, Henke J, et al. Fetal spina bifida repair: current trends and prospects of intrauterine neurosurgery. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008;23:271-286.
87. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelome­ningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA 1999;282:1819-1825.
88. Holmes NM, Nguyen HT, Harrison MR, et al. Fetal intervention for myelomeningocele: effect on postnatal bladder function. J Urol 2001;166:2383-2386.
89. Holzbeierlein J, Pope JI, Adams MC, et al. The urodynamic profile of myelodysplasia in childhood with spinal closure during gestation. J Urol 2000;164:1336-1339.
90. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, et al. Improvement in hind­brain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 1999;282:1826-1831.
91. Steinbok P, Cochrane DD. The nature of congenital posterior cervi­cal or cervicothoracic midline cutaneous mass lesions: report of eight cases. J Neurosurg 1991;75:206-212.
Myelocystocele
92. Bhargava R, Hammond DI, Benzie RJ, et al. Prenatal demonstration of a cervical myelocystocele. Prenat Diagn 1992;12:653-659.
93. Steinbok P. Dysraphic lesions of the cervical spinal cord. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1995;6:367-376.
94. Byrd SE, Harvey C, McLone DG, Darling CF. Imaging of terminal myelocystoceles. J Natl Med Assoc 1996;88:510-516.
95. Choi S, McComb JG. Long-term outcome of terminal myelocysto­cele patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 2000;32:86-91.
96. Muthukumar N. Terminal and nonterminal myelocystoceles. J Neu­rosurg 2007;107:87-97.
97. Allen LM, Silverman RK. Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of fetal diastematomyelia: two cases of type I split cord malformation. Ultra­sound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:78-82.
1272 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
Diastematomyelia
98. Sonigo-Cohen P, Schmit P, Zerah M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:555-560.
99. Dabra A, Gupta R, Sidhu R, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of diaste­matomyelia in utero: a case report and literature review. Australas Radiol 2001;45:222-224.
100. Raghavendra BN, Epstein FJ, Pinto RS, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of diastematomyelia. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7:111-113.
101. Anderson NG, Jordan S, MacFarlane MR, Lovell-Smith M. Diaste­matomyelia: diagnosis by prenatal sonography. AJR Am J Roent­genol 1994;163:911-914.
102. Korsvik HE, Keller MS. Sonography of occult dysraphism in neo­nates and infants with MR imaging correlation. Radiographics 1992;12:297-306; discussion 307-308.
103. Has R, Yuksel A, Buyukkurt S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of diastema­tomyelia: presentation of eight cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:845-849.
104. Harrison LA, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE. Abnormal spinal curva­ture in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:473-479.
Scoliosis and Kyphosis
105. Patten RM, van Allen M, Mack LA, et al. Limb–body wall complex: in utero sonographic diagnosis of a complicated fetal malformation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:1019-1024.
106. Van Allen MI, Curry C, Walden CE, et al. Limb–body wall com­plex: II. Limb and spine defects. Am J Med Genet 1987;28:549-
565.
107. Benacerraf BR, Greene MF, Barss VA. Prenatal sonographic diagno­sis of congenital hemivertebra. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:257-
259.
108. Zelop CM, Pretorius DH, Benacerraf BR. Fetal hemivertebrae: asso­ciated anomalies, significance, and outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:412-416.
109. Twickler D, Budorick N, Pretorius D, et al. Caudal regression versus sirenomelia: sonographic clues. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:323-
330.
Sacral Agenesis
110. Sepulveda W, Corral E, Sanchez J, et al. Sirenomelia sequence versus renal agenesis: prenatal differentiation with power Doppler ultra­sound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:445-449.
111. Baxi L, Warren W, Collins MH, Timor-Tritsch IE. Early detection of caudal regression syndrome with transvaginal scanning. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:486-489.
Caudal Regression
112. Stocker JT, Heifetz SA. Sirenomelia. A morphological study of 33 cases and review of the literature. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1987;10: 7-50.
Sirenomelia
113. Stevenson RE, Jones KL, Phelan MC, et al. Vascular steal: the pathogenetic mechanism producing sirenomelia and associated defects of the viscera and soft tissues. Pediatrics 1986;78:451-457.
114. Bloechle M, Bollmann R, Zienert A, et al. [Fetal teratoma: diagnosis and management]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1992;114:175-180.
Sacrococcygeal Teratoma; Presacral Fetal Mass
115. Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: Ameri­can Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey—1973. J Pediatr Surg 1974;9:389-398.
116. Sheth S, Nussbaum AR, Sanders RC, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radi­ology 1988;169:131-136.
117. Bond SJ, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Death due to high­output cardiac failure in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:1287-1291.
118. Langer JC, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Fetal hydrops and death from sacrococcygeal teratoma: rationale for fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1145-1150.
119. Gross SJ, Benzie RJ, Sermer M, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156:393-396.
120. Teal LN, Angtuaco TL, Jimenez JF, Quirk Jr JG. Fetal teratomas: antenatal diagnosis and clinical management. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:329-336.
121. Robertson FM, Crombleholme TM, Frantz 3rd ID, et al. Devascu­larization and staged resection of giant sacrococcygeal teratoma in the premature infant. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:309-311.
CHAPTER 36
The Fetal Chest
Rola Shaheen and Deborah Levine
Chapter Outline
DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES
IN THE CHEST
Pulmonary Development Normal Sonographic Features of the
Fetal Chest Normal Diaphragm Normal Thymus
PULMONARY HYPOPLASIA AND
APLASIA CONGENITAL PULMONARY
AIRWAY MALFORMATION
SPECTRUM
Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid
Malformation Bronchopulmonary Sequestration Congenital Lobar Emphysema
CONGENITAL HIGH AIRWAY
OBSTRUCTION BRONCHOGENIC CYST NEURENTERIC CYST PLEURAL EFFUSION PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
Familiarity with the normal development of the fetal
chest is important both for recognizing chest anomalies and for understanding the consequences of these anoma­lies. Accurate prenatal diagnosis of noncardiac thoracic lesions is essential in providing appropriate recommen­dations for fetal karyotyping and in planning for in utero intervention and mode of delivery. Sonography is impor­tant for recognition of thoracic lesions and assessment of their impact on mediastinal structures, because chest lesions can lead to compromised cardiac function and hydrops. Chest abnormalities may be associated with lethal pulmonary hypoplasia, fatal chromosomal abnor­malities, and lethal structural anomalies. However, some chest lesions resolve in utero with minimal sequelae. In cases with unclear sonographic diagnosis or planned in utero interventions, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful.
DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURES IN THE CHEST
Pulmonary Development
In the human lung, there are five distinct stages of devel­opment, during which the lung matures and the number of alveoli increases. but structurally immature; the greatest increase in number of alveoli occurs postnatally. During the first 3 years of life, the alveoli are formed through a septation
1,2
At birth, the lungs are functional
CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC
HERNIA
Left-Sided Hernia Right-Sided Hernia Other Hernias and Eventration Associated Anomalies Morbidity and Mortality In Utero Therapy
CONCLUSION
process that increases the gas exchange surface area. It is important to understand that this lung development process is ongoing, and that space-occupying lesions, or extrinsic abnormalities that do not allow for normal lung growth, can lead to improper lung development.
Normal Sonographic Features of the Fetal Chest
The fetal lungs are identified by ultrasound as homoge­neously echogenic tissue surrounding the heart, sepa­rated by the hypoechoic, dome-shaped diaphragm from the abdominal organs (Fig. 36-1, A and B). The fetal ribs are highly echogenic, curved bony structures arising near the spine and extending anteriorly to encompass more than half the thoracic circumference. Lung echogenicity varies during gestation, in general increasing in echo­genicity as lung development progresses.
Assessment of pulmonary size is important for evalu­ation of fetuses at risk for pulmonary hypoplasia, par­ticularly in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), pleural effusions, prolonged oligohydram- nios, and skeletal deformities. Methods to assess pul­monary size include measurement of the thoracic circumference nal thoracic area minus cardiac area in diastole on a transverse four-chamber view (3-D) lung volumetry with ultrasound or MRI.
3
(Table 36-1), lung area (defined as inter-
4
), and three-dimensional
5-7
The fetal lungs, thorax, and heart grow at similar rates, such that the normal cardiothoracic ratio remains
1273
1274 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
STAGES OF HUMAN LUNG
DEVELOPMENT
1. Embryonic stage. Extends to about 7 weeks.
2. Pseudoglandular stage. Extends from 6 to 16
weeks; the lungs resemble tubuloacinar glands, with epithelial tubes sprouting and branching into the surrounding mesenchyme.
3. Canalicular stage. Extends from 16 to 28
weeks; the cuboid epithelium differentiates into type I and type II cells, with production of surfactant and formation of the first, thin, air-blood barriers.
4. Saccular stage. Extends from 28 to 36 weeks;
the pulmonary parenchyma forms, the surrounding connective tissues thins, and the surfactant system matures.
5. Alveolar stage. Extends from the 36th week of
gestation to the first 3 years of life.
constant in the second and third trimesters. On a normal four-chamber transverse view of the heart, the heart should occupy approximately one-third to one-half the sonographic diameter of the thorax.
The cardiac position and axis are constant in normal fetuses. The apex of the heart points left and touches the anterior chest wall. The posterior aspect of the right atrium lies to the right of midline.
8
Familiarity with the normal anatomy and position of the fetal heart is crucial, along with in utero establish­ment of the right and left sides of the fetus. The reference to cardiac position and situs is identified by noting the left atrium lies posteriorly, closest to the spine, and the right ventricle lies anteriorly, close to the chest wall. Any deviation in the position of the heart should prompt a search for cardiac or pulmonary abnormality. Anatomy of the fetal heart, including size and position, can be easily influenced by extracardiac thoracic anomalies.
Normal Diaphragm
Early in embryogenesis, the narrow pleuroperitoneal duct connects the pleural and peritoneal cavities. The development of the diaphragm, at about 9 weeks, divides the two cavities. The normal diaphragm and diaphragm motion can be visualized as early as 10 weeks of gestation.
9-11
The diaphragm appears as a thin,
hypoechoic, arched line separating the chest from intra­abdominal contents (Fig. 36-1, C, D, and F). It is best recognized as a dome on each side on sagittal and coronal views, with no difference in the height of the diaphragm on either side.
12
The intact left hemidiaphragm is empha­sized by the presence of the fluid-filled stomach in the abdomen. On the right side, however, meticulous effort may be required to identify the hypoechoic linear mus­cular diaphragm between the liver and lung.
Normal Thymus
The fetal thymus can be identified as early as 14 weeks’ gestation in the anterior mediastinum. By the third tri­mester, the thymus is visualized as an ovoid, relatively hypoechoic structure thymus contains spindle-shaped echogenicities that dif­ferentiate it from the surrounding lungs.
13,14
(Fig. 36-1, G and I ). The
15
Thymus size varies greatly during gestation. Thymic imaging and mea­surements are not performed routinely on prenatal scans. However, prenatal identification and measurement of the fetal thymus is important when DiGeorge syndrome is suspected. In addition, a large thymus will sometimes be confused with a mediastinal mass. It is therefore impor­tant to recognize the normal appearance of the thymus. The normal thymic average transverse measurement is 12 mm at 19 weeks’ gestation and 33 mm at 33 weeks.15 The normal thymic average perimeter is 128 mm at 38 weeks.13 Acute fetal thymic involution has been reported in association with chorioamnionitis.
16
PULMONARY HYPOPLASIA AND APLASIA
Pulmonary hypoplasia is defined as a reduction in the number of cells, airways, and alveoli that results in an absolute decrease in the size and weight of the fetal lungs relative to gestational age. the fetal lungs, the more severe is the degree of pulmo­nary hypoplasia.
20
Pulmonary hypoplasia is a relatively common process that results in severe postnatal respira­tory distress and associated high neonatal mortality, with a high incidence of stillbirths (6.7%). turity of the lungs contributes to the nonviability of fetuses less than 24 weeks.
Pulmonary hypoplasia can be primary or secondary and can be unilateral or bilateral depending on the etiol­ogy and time of insult to the lungs. Primary pulmonary hypoplasia is very rare and is caused by a primary process in which the lung does not form normally. Unilateral pulmonary agenesis, in which no normal lung forms, has an incidence of 1 in 15,000 births and is associated with other congenital anomalies.
agenesis is incompatible with postnatal life.
Secondary causes of pulmonary hypoplasia include
masses that compress the lungs (e.g., CDH), skeletal malformations that do not allow the lungs to grow (e.g., thanatophoric dysplasia), and severe prolonged oligohy­dramnios (e.g., bilateral renal agenesis). Other factors that contribute to pulmonary hypoplasia include hor­monal influences, pulmonary fluid dynamics, and abnor­mal fetal breathing movements. of pulmonary hypoplasia are associated with major struc­tural or chromosomal abnormalities (Table 36-2).
Prenatal prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia and the degree of severity are crucial for parental counseling as
17-19
The earlier the insult to
18
The imma-
22
Bilateral pulmonary
23
The majority of cases
21
Lu
Chapter 36 The Fetal Chest 1275
Li
Li
Lu
A
Left
D
Right
E F
B
Right Left
C
G H
FIGURE 36-1. Normal fetal chest. A, Sagittal view of torso at 13 weeks. Note liver (Li), lungs (Lu), and diaphragm. B, Four-
chamber view of the heart surrounded by the homogeneous echogenic lungs at 18 weeks. C, Coronal, and D, sagittal, views of chest at 18 weeks show the dome-shaped hemidiaphragms (arrow) separating the lungs (Lu) from intraabdominal organs and the relative hypoechoic appearance of the liver (Li). E and F, Axial and sagittal views of fetal chest at 37 weeks. G, Normal appearance of fetal thymus (arrowheads) at 37 weeks’ gestation. H, Coronal T2-weighted MR image shows normal lungs and diaphragm at 37 weeks. I, Axial T2-weighted MR image of thymus (arrows) anterior to heart. The thymus is relatively hypoechoic to the surrounding lungs on ultrasound and relatively low intensity on MRI.
well as for postnatal management planning, especially for neonates requiring intensive respiratory care immedi­ately after birth. prenatal pulmonary hypoplasia lung volumes by 3-D ultrasound thoracic circumference
9,32
ratio,
lung-to-body weight ratio,24 and Doppler
studies of pulmonary arteries.
24
Proposed methods for prediction of
30,31
25
include estimation of
26,27
or by MRI,
(Table 36-1), lung-to-head
33
28,29
Prognosis and management are variable and depend on the severity and nature of the associated conditions. For example, absence of fetal breathing movements in
the setting of oligohydramnios in pregnancies resulting from premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is an accurate predictor for pulmonary hypoplasia. the spectrum of outcomes ranges from mild respiratory insufficiency to neonatal death.
In cases of unilateral pulmonary hypoplasia or aplasia, there is mediastinal shift to the side of the hypoplastic lung, with no associated mass in the contralateral lung to explain the degree of mediastinal shift The contralateral lung will often be enlarged and echo-
22
genic.
Unilateral pulmonary hypoplasia can also be
I
4
Clinically,
34
(Fig. 36-2).
1276 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
TABLE 36-1. NORMAL THORACIC CIRCUMFERENCE AND LENGTH CORRELATED WITH
MENSTRUAL (GESTATIONAL) AGE*
Predictive Percentiles
AGE (WK)
2.5 5 10 25 50 75 90 95 97.5
16 5.9 6.4 7.0 8.0 9.1 10.3 11.3 11.9 12.4 17 6.8 7.3 7.9 8.9 10.1 11.2 12.2 12.8 13.3 18 7.7 8.2 8.8 9.8 11.0 12.1 13.1 13.7 14.2 19 8.6 9.1 9.7 10.7 11.9 13.0 14.0 14.6 15.1 20 9.5 10.0 10.6 11.7 12.9 13.9 15.0 15.5 16.0 21 10.4 11.0 11.6 12.6 13.7 14.8 15.8 16.4 16.9 22 11.3 11.9 12.5 13.5 14.6 15.7 16.7 17.3 17.8 23 12.2 12.8 13.4 14.4 15.5 16.6 17.6 18.2 18.8 24 13.2 13.7 14.3 15.3 16.4 17.5 18.5 19.1 19.7 25 14.1 14.6 15.2 16.2 17.3 18.4 19.4 20.0 20.6 26 15.0 15.5 16.1 17.1 18.2 19.3 20.3 21.0 21.5 27 15.9 16.4 17.0 18.0 19.1 20.2 21.3 21.9 22.4 28 16.8 17.3 17.9 18.9 20.0 21.2 22.2 22.8 23.3 29 17.7 30 18.6 19.1 19.7 20.7 21.9 23.0 24.0 24.6 25.1 31 19.5 20.0 20.6 21.6 22.8 23.9 24.9 25.5 26.0 32 20.4 20.9 21.5 22.6 23.7 24.8 25.8 26.4 26.9 33 21.3 21.8 22.5 23.5 24.6 25.7 26.7 27.3 27.8 34 22.2 22.8 23.4 24.4 25.5 26.6 27.6 28.2 28.7 35 23.1 23.7 24.3 25.3 26.4 27.5 28.5 29.1 29.6 36 24.0 24.6 25.2 26.2 27.3 28.4 29.4 30.0 30.6 37 24.9 25.5 26.1 27.1 28.2 29.3 30.3 30.9 31.5 38 25.9 26.4 27.0 28.0 29.1 30.2 31.2 31.9 32.4 39 26.8 27.3 27.9 28.9 30.0 31.1 32.2 32.8 33.3 40 27.7 28.2 28.8 29.8 30.9 32.1 33.1 33.7 34.2
16 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.0 3.2 17 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 18 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.6 19 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.8 20 1.6 1.8 2.30 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.8 4.0 21 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.1 22 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.3 23 2.2 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.3 4.5 24 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.5 4.7 25 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.7 4.9 26 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 4.9 5.1 27 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.1 5.3 28 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.4 29 3.3 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.2 5.5 5.6 30 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.1 5.4 5.6 31 3.7 3.9 4.1 4.5 4.9 5.3 5.6 5.8 6.0 32 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.6 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.2 33 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.4 34 4.2 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.6 35 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.6 6.8 36 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.2 6.5 6.8 7.0 37 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.7 7.0 7.1 38 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.8 6.2 6.6 6.9 7.1 7.3 39 5.2 5.4 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.8 7.1 7.3 7.5 40 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.1 6.5 6.9 7.3 7.5 7.7
18.2 18.8 19.8 21.0 22.1 23.1 23.7 24.2
Thoracic Circumference (CM)
Thoracic Length (cm)
2.2 2.6 3.0 3.2 3.4
5.8
*From Chitkara U, Rosenberg J, Chevanak FA, et al. Prenatal sonographic assessment of thorax: normal values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1069-1074.
produced by space-occupying lesions, such as congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation (CCAM), CDH, or pleural effusion. The extent of pulmonary hypoplasia for
CONGENITAL PULMONARY MALFORMATION SPECTRUM
a given amount of visualized lung is greater in fetuses with CDH than with CCAM, suggesting that in CDH there is a mechanism other than mass effect that limits pulmonary development.
An echogenic lesion in the fetal thorax (Table 36-3) or a cystic lesion in the fetal thorax (Table 36-4) can be part of the congenital pulmonary airway malformation