Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5759_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
93 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 33 The Fetal Face and Neck 1187
T
A
T
C
D
B
T
FE
FIGURE 33-23. Macroglossia. A, Macroglossia with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome at 33 weeks’ gestation. Note the enlarged
tongue (arrow) protruding from the mouth (curved arrows, lips). B to F, Macroglossia in association with lymphatic malformation at 35 weeks’ gestation. B and C, Coronal and sagittal sonograms show tongue protrusion (T) secondary to a lymphatic malformation involving both sides of the face and infiltrating the base of the tongue. D, Coronal sonogram shows the complex facial mass (cursors). E and F, Sagit- tal and coronal MR images show macroglossia (T) and the lymphatic malformation (arrows) infiltrating the deep facial structures.
1188 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
A B
FIGURE 33-24. Micrognathia with Pierre-Robin sequence. A, Sonographic, and B, MR, profiles of a 20-week fetus with
Pierre-Robin sequence show severe micrognathia/retrognathia (arrow). At follow-up at age 5 (not shown), the child is tracheostomy dependent secondary to airway issues.
Micrognathia and Retrognathia
Micrognathia is a small chin, and retrognathia (retrog­nathism) is a posteriorly displaced chin. These are distinct abnormalities that frequently occur together. Pierre-Robin sequence is the term used to describe an abnormally small and often posteriorly displaced lower jaw with associated cleft soft palate (Fig. 33-24). This finding is associated with syndromes (e.g., Stickler, velocardio facial, Miller-Diecker, Beckwith-Wiedemann, Treacher Collins, Pfeiffer), chromosomal anomalies (typically trisomy 18 or 13), and skeletal dysplasias (e.g., diastrophic, spondyloepiphyseal, congenital, camptom­elic). If the abnormality is severe enough to interfere with fetal swallowing in utero, polyhydramnios may result. Micrognathia can lead to substantial feeding difficulties and problems with airway management after birth.
Micrognathia is best seen on midsagittal views of the fetal face and is identified by subjective assessment by the sonologist. Although there have been attempts to standardize fetal jaw measurements
82-84
to identify micro­gnathia more objectively, there is no consensus on methodology. Three-dimensional sonography offers an additional method for the evaluation of micrognathia, because 2-D data can be manipulated to obtain a true sagittal view of the fetal face, which might otherwise not be possible. tional abnormalities,
85
Many fetuses with micrognathia have addi-
86
so the physician should carefully search for associated anomalies, and fetal karyotyping is recommended.
Agnathia is total or partial absence of the lower jaw
and is often associated with holoprosencephaly (Fig.
33-25). Microstomia is a small mouth, often associated
with agnathia and otocephaly.
5
SOFT TISSUE TUMORS
Soft tissue or bony tumors can cause alterations in head size or shape. A relatively common soft tissue lesion involving the face is a hemangioma (Fig. 33-26). Vascu- lar anomalies such as hemangiomas are the most common tumors of infancy, and most are medically insignificant. On fetal sonography, hemangiomas often present as echogenic, predominantly solid masses. These masses may contain detectable vascular channels with flow on Doppler ultrasound evaluation. Hemangiomas often increase in size during fetal life and can be infiltrative, affecting large areas. Classically, hemangiomas do not infiltrate bony structures. Hemangiomas can occur in any location and can involve the fetal face or neck. The adja­cent skull may be thinner and may be associated with brain anomalies as in Sturge-Weber syndrome.
87-90
NECK ABNORMALITIES
Nuchal Translucency and Thickening
The nuchal translucency (NT) is the fluid collection that forms posterior to the fetal neck during early development. Studies have shown that thickened-NT measurements in the first trimester are associated with
Chapter 33 The Fetal Face and Neck 1189
A B
FIGURE 33-25. Agnathia microstomia. A, Sagittal sonogram, and B, MR image, show the absent mandible. This is the same
fetus as in Figs. 33-9, A, and 33-16, A.
fetal aneuploidy, cardiac defects, other major malfor­mations, and adverse pregnancy outcome.
91-95
In the second trimester, the nuchal fold thickness is mea­sured in the suboccipital bregmatic plane. A measure­ment of 6 mm or greater from 15 to 22 weeks is associated with an increased risk of trisomy 21.
96,97
The measurement is taken in the midline from outer edge of the occipital bone to the outer edge of the skin (see Chapter 31).
Lymphatic Malformation (Cystic Hygroma)
Lymphatic malformation, known historically as cystic hygroma, is a septated fluid collection behind the fetal neck, thought to result from early maldevelopment of the lymphatic system. This abnormality is highly associated with Turner syndrome (XO), other chromosomal anom- alies, and cardiac structural abnormalities. When associ­ated with hydrops, fetal mortality is very high. As with an increased NT, if a lymphatic malformation is diagnosed and chromosomes are found to be normal, the fetus should still be carefully evaluated for cardiac abnormalities.
Lymphatic malformations can occur elsewhere in the head and neck and may be microcystic or macrocystic. They are presumed to result from obstructed lymphatic sacs that do not communicate with main lymphatic channels. Although benign, morbidity is associated with mass effect on the fetal airway when such masses arise in the face and neck (Fig. 33-27). In this setting, fetal MRI is often useful for evaluation of the fetal airway and for delivery planning. Fluid-filled lymphatic malformations, even when large, are much more malleable than solid
teratomas of the head and neck and are less likely to compromise the airway. When these malformations involve the tongue, cystic hygromas may interfere with swallowing and feeding after birth.
Cervical Teratoma
Teratoma is the most common tumor in neonates, with the majority located at the sacrum and coccyx. Approxi­mately 5% of teratomas arise in the neck or oropharynx. Cervical teratomas occur equally in males and females.
98
Sonographically, teratomas are usually complex masses composed of both cystic and solid elements and are often associated with regions of calcification. There is usually vascular flow within the solid portions of the mass. In the neck, they are usually anterolateral in location and can become quite large, often involving the thyroid gland. When they arise in the neck, teratomas may impinge on the airway, interfere with fetal swallowing, and result in polyhydramnios. Evaluation of the fetal airway is particularly important to delivery planning and is often best accomplished with fetal MRI (Fig. 33-28).
When teratomas arise in the neck, there can be hyper­extension of the fetal neck, best seen in sagittal views. Teratomas of the oropharynx (epignathus) often pro­trude from the mouth. Although most teratomas are histologically benign, prognosis depends on the degree of mass effect on the trachea and the ability to secure the infant’s airway at delivery. If there is substantial mass effect on the airway, the ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure may be necessary. This complex procedure requires a team of specialists for the mother and fetus and involves cesarean delivery, with
1190 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
A
C
D
B
FE
FIGURE 33-26. Hemangioma at 30 weeks’ gestation. A, Axial sonogram shows a large, lateral and posterior soft tissue
scalp mass (arrows). B, High-frequency coned-down view illustrates the heterogeneous echogenicity of the mass. C, Power Doppler view demonstrates the vascularity of the mass. D, Oblique sonogram of the fetal chest and neck show a greatly enlarged superior vena cava (arrowheads). The heart was also enlarged, and the fetus was in heart failure from the volume of blood circulating through the scalp mass. E, Coronal prenatal, and F, postnatal, MR images show the left scalp mass (arrows).
Chapter 33 The Fetal Face and Neck 1191
A B
FIGURE 33-27. Cervical lymphatic malformation at 29 weeks’ gestation (cystic hygroma). A, Axial sonogram,
and B, sagittal MR image, of a 29-week fetus with a septated cystic mass in the neck, consistent with a lymphatic malformation.
preservation of the maternal-fetal circulation through the placenta until the neonatal airway can be secured.
99-103
Thyromegaly and Goiter
Fetal goiter is rare (1 : 30,000-50,000 live births)
104
and most often related to maternal thyroid disease, such as Graves’ disease or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, with anti­bodies that cross the placenta and lead to fetal thyroid dysfunction. Maternal use of thyroid blocking agents (e.g., propylthiouracil) may also result in fetal goiter. Primary fetal thyroid dysfunction may also cause goiter.
Fetal goiter presents as a midline homogeneous solid mass in the anterior neck surrounding the trachea (Fig.
33-29). There may be increased blood flow to the goiter.
When large, fetal goiters cause hyperextension of the neck, leading to interference with fetal swallowing and resultant polyhydramnios. Neck hyperextension can lead to fetal malpresentation and can cause difficulties at delivery. Cordocentesis may be necessary to determine if there is fetal hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. In the setting of fetal hypothyroidism, treatment with intra­amniotic thyroid hormone will often lead to a decrease in size of the fetal goiter.
105
Following treatment with
intrauterine thyroxine, fetal goiter may decrease in size,
and hyperextension of the fetal neck may resolve. In cases of fetal hyperthyroidism, it is important to evaluate for fetal tachycardia and high-output cardiac failure.
CONCLUSION
Prenatal sonographic evaluation of the fetal face and neck offers an opportunity to identify many abnormali­ties. These observations are often essential to prenatal counseling and prognosis because of the association of many of these abnormalities with syndromes and chro­mosomal anomalies. Appropriate diagnosis of abnor­malities allows for planning of the appropriate mode of delivery and therapy when the fetal airway is potentially compromised.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge with gratitude the assis­tance of librarians Alison Clapp and Miriam Geller and the administrative assistance of Susan Ivey, Department of Radiology, at Children’s Hospital Boston. Special thanks also to Ants Toi, MD, for the discussion on craniosynostosis.
1192 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
A
C
B
FIGURE 33-28. Cervical teratoma. A and B, 2-D
and 3-D sagittal sonograms of a 20-week fetus with a complex solid and cystic neck mass, which was a cervical teratoma. C, Sagittal MR image of same fetus at 34 weeks’ gestation.
Chapter 33 The Fetal Face and Neck 1193
A
C
B
D
FIGURE 33-29. Fetal goiter. A and B, 2-D and
3-D images of neck hyperextension in fetus with goiter at 24 weeks’ gestation. C, Different fetus at 30 weeks’ gestation with goiter. Coronal sonogram shows bilat­erally enlarged thyroid lobes (arrows) surrounding the normal midline trachea. D, Axial, and E, coronal, MR
E
images show that the enlarged fetal thyroid gland (arrows) does not compromise the airway.
1194 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
References
1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guidelines for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations,
2007.
Embryology and Development
2. Moore KL, Persaud T. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002.
3. Van de Water TR, Staecker H. Otolaryngology: basic science and clinical review. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006.
4. Brookes M, Zietman A. Clinical embryology: a color atlas and text. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2008.
5. Nyberg DA, McGahan JP, Pretorius DH, Pilu G. Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Williams & Williams;
2002.
6. Forrester JV, Dick AD, McMenamin PG, Lee WR. The eye: basic sciences in practice. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2002.
7. Haak MC, Bartelings MM, Jackson DG, et al. Increased nuchal translucency is associated with jugular lymphatic distension. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1086-1092.
Sonography of the Normal Fetal Face
8. Kurjak A, Azumendi G, Andonotopo W, et al. Three- and four­dimensional ultrasonography for the structural and functional evalu­ation of the fetal face. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:16-28.
9. Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE, et al. Fetal lip and primary palate: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultra­sound. Radiology 2000;217:236-239.
10. Campbell S, Lees C, Moscoso G, Hall P. Ultrasound antenatal diag­nosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D “reverse face” view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:12-18.
11. Chen ML, Chang CH, Yu CH, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1017-1023.
12. Lee W, Kirk JS, Shaheen KW, et al. Fetal cleft lip and palate detec­tion by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:314-320.
Abnormalities of the Head
13. Chervenak FA, Jeanty P, Cantraine F, et al. The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;149:512-517.
14. Thomas M. The lemon sign. Radiology 2003;228:206-207.
15. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Hirsch J, Mahony BS. Abnormalities of fetal cranial contour in sonographic detection of spina bifida: evaluation of the “lemon” sign. Radiology 1988;167:387-392.
16. Nicolaides K, Salvesen D, Snijders R, Gosden C. Strawberry-shaped skull in fetal trisomy 18. Fetal Diagn Ther 1992;7:132-137.
17. Slater BJ, Lenton KA, Kwan MD, et al. Cranial sutures: a brief review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:170e-178e.
18. Hajihosseini MK. Fibroblast growth factor signaling in cranial suture development and pathogenesis. Front Oral Biol 2008;12: 160-177.
19. Rawlins JT, Opperman LA. TGF-beta regulation of suture morpho­genesis and growth. Front Oral Biol 2008;12:178-196.
20. Hukki J, Saarinen P, Kangasniemi M. Single suture craniosynostosis: diagnosis and imaging. Front Oral Biol 2008;12:79-90.
21. Delahaye S, Bernard JP, Renier D, Ville Y. Prenatal ultrasound diag­nosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:347-353.
22. Flores-Sarnat L. New insights into craniosynostosis. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2002;9:274-291.
23. Gorincour G, Rypens F, Grignon A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cloverleaf skull: watch the hands! Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20: 296-300.
24. Dover MS. Abnormal skull shape: clinical management. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38(Suppl 3):484-487.
25. Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D. Management of cra­niosynostoses. Child Nerv Syst 2000;16:645-658.
26. Brunelle F, Baraton J, Renier D. Intracranial venous anomalies asso­ciated with atretic cephalocoeles. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30: 743-747.
Orbit Abnormalities
27. Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Toi A, et al. MRI of the fetal eyes: morpho­logic and biometric assessment for abnormal development with
ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic correlation. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:971-981.
28. Trout T, Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, McGahan JP. Significance of orbital measurements in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 1994;13: 937-943.
29. Tan ST, Mulliken JB. Hypertelorism: nosologic analysis of 90 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:317-327.
30. Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D’Alton ME. Fetology: diagnosis and management of the fetal patient. New York: McGraw-Hill;
2000.
31. Dilmen G, Koktener A, Turhan NO, Tez S. Growth of the fetal lens and orbit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;76:267-271.
32. Verma AS, Fitzpatrick DR. Anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007;2:47.
33. Warburg M. Classification of microphthalmos and coloboma. J Med Genet 1993;30:664-669.
34. Bault JP, Quarello E. Retinal coloboma: prenatal diagnosis using a new technique, the “virtual fetal eyeground.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:495-496.
35. Righini A, Avagliano L, Doneda C, et al. Prenatal magnetic reso­nance imaging of optic nerve head coloboma. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28:242-246.
36. Bateman JB. Microphthalmos. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1984;24:87-
107.
37. Cohen AJ, Mercandetti M, Brazzo BG. The lacrimal system. New York: Springer; 2006.
38. Wong RK, VanderVeen DK. Presentation and management of con­genital dacryocystocele. Pediatrics 2008;122:e1108-e1112.
39. Rahi JS, Dezateux C. Measuring and interpreting the incidence of congenital ocular anomalies: lessons from a national study of con­genital cataract in the UK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42: 1444-1448.
Ear Abnormalities
40. Shih JC, Shyu MK, Lee CN, et al. Antenatal depiction of the fetal ear with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:500-505.
41. Eavey RD. Microtia and significant auricular malformation: ninety­two pediatric patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 121:57-62.
42. Yeo L, Guzman ER, Ananth CV, et al. Prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy by sonographic ear length. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22: 565-576.
Midface Abnormalities
43. Lowe LH, Booth TN, Joglar JM, Rollins NK. Midface anomalies in children. Radiographics 2000;20:907-922; quiz 1106-1107, 1112.
44. Dietze I, Fritz B, Huhle D, et al. Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular investigation in a fetus with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome with pater­nally derived 4p deletion: case report and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19:251-260.
45. Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, et al. Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11-14 weeks of gestation: an observa­tional study. Lancet 2001;358:1665-1667.
46. Orlandi F, Bilardo CM, Campogrande M, et al. Measurement of nasal bone length at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy and its potential role in Down syndrome risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:36-39.
47. Otano L, Aiello H, Igarzabal L, et al. Association between first tri­mester absence of fetal nasal bone on ultrasound and Down syn­drome. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:930-932.
48. Vintzileos A, Walters C, Yeo L. Absent nasal bone in the prenatal detection of fetuses with trisomy 21 in a high-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:905-908.
49. Cusick W, Provenzano J, Sullivan CA, et al. Fetal nasal bone length in euploid and aneuploid fetuses between 11 and 20 weeks’ gestation: a prospective study. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:1327-
1333.
50. Rosen T, D’Alton ME, Platt LD, Wapner R. First-trimester ultra­sound assessment of the nasal bone to screen for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:399-404.
51. Cicero S, Dezerega V, Andrade E, et al. Learning curve for sono­graphic examination of the fetal nasal bone at 11-14 weeks. Ultra­sound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:135-137.
52. Sadler T. Langman’s medical embryology. Philadelphia: Lippincott– Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
Chapter 33 The Fetal Face and Neck 1195
53. Kirschner RE, LaRossa D. Cleft lip and palate. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33:1191-1215, v-vi.
54. Berge SJ, Plath H, van de Vondel PT, et al. Fetal cleft lip and palate: sonographic diagnosis, chromosomal abnormalities, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome in 70 fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:422-431.
55. Chmait R, Pretorius D, Moore T, et al. Prenatal detection of associ­ated anomalies in fetuses diagnosed with cleft lip with or without cleft palate in utero. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:173-
176.
56. Calzolari E, Pierini A, Astolfi G, et al. Associated anomalies in multi­malformed infants with cleft lip and palate: an epidemiologic study of nearly 6 million births in 23 EuroCat registries. Am J Med Genet A 2007;143:528-537.
57. Nyberg DA, Sickler GK, Hegge FN, et al. Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: ultrasound classification and correlation with outcome. Radiology 1995;195:677-684.
58. Walker SJ, Ball RH, Babcook CJ, Feldkamp MM. Prevalence of aneuploidy and additional anatomic abnormalities in fetuses and neonates with cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a population­based study in Utah. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:1175-1180; quiz 1181-1182.
59. Perrotin F, de Poncheville LM, Marret H, et al. Chromosomal defects and associated malformations in fetal cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;99:19-24.
60. Benacerraf BR. Ultrasound of fetal syndromes. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
61. Stoll C, Clementi M. Prenatal diagnosis of dysmorphic syndromes by routine fetal ultrasound examination across Europe. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:543-551.
62. Shaikh D, Mercer NS, Sohan K, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:288-289.
63. Cash C, Set P, Coleman N. The accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in the detection of facial clefts in a low-risk screening population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:432-436.
64. Clementi M, Tenconi R, Bianchi F, Stoll C. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. EuroScan study group. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:870-875.
65. Robinson JN, McElrath TF, Benson CB, et al. Prenatal ultrasonog­raphy and the diagnosis of fetal cleft lip. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:1165-1170; quiz 1172-1173.
66. Hanikeri M, Savundra J, Gillett D, et al. Antenatal transabdominal ultrasound detection of cleft lip and palate in Western Australia from 1996 to 2003. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:61-66.
67. Ghi T, Perolo A, Banzi C, et al. Two-dimensional ultrasound is accurate in the diagnosis of fetal craniofacial malformation. Ultra­sound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:543-551.
68. Wang LM, Leung KY, Tang M. Prenatal evaluation of facial clefts by three-dimensional extended imaging. Prenat Diagn 2007;27: 722-729.
69. McGahan MC, Ramos GA, Landry C, et al. Multislice display of the fetal face using 3-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1573-1581.
70. Ghi T, Tani G, Savelli L, et al. Prenatal imaging of facial clefts by magnetic resonance imaging with emphasis on the posterior palate. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:970-975.
71. Stroustrup Smith A, Estroff JA, Barnewolt CE, et al. Prenatal diag­nosis of cleft lip and cleft palate using MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:229-235.
72. Cohen Jr MM. Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic, and molecu­lar dimensions. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76: 658-673.
73. Longaker MT, Lipshutz GS, Kawamoto Jr HK. Reconstruction of Tessier no. 4 clefts revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1501-
1507.
74. Tessier P. Anatomical classification: facial, cranio-facial and latero­facial clefts. J Maxillofac Surg 1976;4:69-92.
75. Benacerraf BR, Sadow PM, Barnewolt CE, et al. Cleft of the second­ary palate without cleft lip diagnosed with three-dimensional ultra­sound and magnetic resonance imaging in a fetus with Fryns’ syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:566-570.
76. Pilu G, Segata M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three­dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29: 166-169.
77. Faure JM, Baumler M, Boulot P, et al. Prenatal assessment of the normal fetal soft palate by three-dimensional ultrasound examina­tion: is there an objective technique? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:652-656.
78. Faure JM, Captier G, Baumler M, Boulot P. Sonographic assessment of normal fetal palate using three-dimensional imaging: a new tech­nique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:159-165.
79. Wong HS, Tait J, Pringle KC. Viewing of the soft and the hard palate on routine 3-D ultrasound sweep of the fetal face: a feasibility study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008;24:146-154.
80. Levine D, Cavazos C, Kazan-Tannus JF, et al. Evaluation of real­time single-shot fast spin-echo MRI for visualization of the fetal midline corpus callosum and secondary palate. AJR Am J Roent­genol 2006;187:1505-1511.
Lower Face Abnormalities
81. Neville B, Damm D, Allen C, Bouquot J. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
82. Otto C, Platt LD. The fetal mandible measurement: an objective determination of fetal jaw size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991; 1:12-17.
83. Chitty LS, Campbell S, Altman DG. Measurement of the fetal mandible: feasibility and construction of a centile chart. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:749-756.
84. Paladini D, Morra T, Teodoro A, et al. Objective diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus: the jaw index. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93: 382-386.
85. Lee W, McNie B, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Three-dimensional ultra­sonographic presentation of micrognathia. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:775-781.
86. Vettraino IM, Lee W, Bronsteen RA, et al. Clinical outcome of fetuses with sonographic diagnosis of isolated micrognathia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:801-805.
Soft Tissue Tumors
87. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial charac­teristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:412-422.
88. Enjolras O, Mulliken JB. Vascular tumors and vascular malforma­tions (new issues). Adv Dermatol 1997;13:375-423.
89. Mulliken JB, Anupindi S, Ezekowitz RA, Mihm Jr MC. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopath­ological exercises. Case 13-2004. A newborn girl with a large cutane­ous lesion, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1764-1775.
90. Legiehn GM, Heran MK. Venous malformations: classification, development, diagnosis, and interventional radiologic management. Radiol Clin North Am 2008;46:545-597, vi.
Neck Abnormalities
91. Hyett J, Perdu M, Sharland G, et al. Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ 1999;318:81-
85.
92. Souka AP, Krampl E, Bakalis S, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:9-17.
93. Michailidis GD, Economides DL. Nuchal translucency measure­ment and pregnancy outcome in karyotypically normal fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:102-105.
94. Makrydimas G, Sotiriadis A, Ioannidis JP. Screening performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1330-1335.
95. Tanriverdi HA, Ertan AK, Hendrik HJ, et al. Outcome of cystic hygroma in fetuses with normal karyotypes depends on associated findings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;118:40-46.
96. Benacerraf BR, Frigoletto Jr FD. Soft tissue nuchal fold in the sec­ond-trimester fetus: standards for normal measurements compared with those in Down syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157: 1146-1149.
97. Benacerraf BR, Gelman R, Frigoletto Jr FD. Sonographic identifica­tion of second-trimester fetuses with Down’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1371-1376.
98. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Kennedy A, Koeller KK. From the archives of the AFIP: a comprehensive review of fetal tumors with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2005;25:215-242.
1196 PART IV Obstetric Sonography
99. Hirose S, Farmer DL, Lee H, et al. The ex utero intrapartum treat­ment procedure: looking back at the EXIT. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39:375-380, discussion.
100. Otteson TD, Hackam DJ, Mandell DL. The ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure: new challenges. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:686-689.
101. Bouchard S, Johnson MP, Flake AW, et al. The EXIT procedure: experience and outcome in 31 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37: 418-426.
102. Wagner W, Harrison MR. Fetal operations in the head and neck area: current state. Head Neck 2002;24:482-490.
103. Leva E, Pansini L, Fava G, et al. The role of the surgeon in the case of a giant neck mass in the EXIT procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:748-750.
104. Fisher DA, Klein AH. Thyroid development and disorders of thyroid function in the newborn. N Engl J Med 1981;304:702-
712.
105. Morine M, Takeda T, Minekawa R, et al. Antenatal diagnosis and treatment of a case of fetal goitrous hypothyroidism associated with high-output cardiac failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19: 506-509.