Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 1037 - файл
.pdf
258 J. P. Hong and A. Datli
or not weighing against clinical situations with systemic sepsis, major tissue loss,
significant comorbid factors, poor patient compliance, and nonreconstructable
peripheral vascular disease. A non-healing ulcer itself should not be considered an
indication for amputation but be systemically approached by various disciplines of
medicine (Apelqvist 1998; Cavanagh et al. 1998). Majority of reconstruction that
needs microsurgical reconstruction are complex defects from diabetic foot, unstable
scars, radiation ulcers, and chronic osteomyelitis as shown in Table 1.
The biggest advantage of using a flap to cover the wound is providing a well
vascularized tissue over the defect. This provides the most resembling tissue after
healing and allows to have better function and aesthetic outcome. Most of all, the
tissue provides an adequate surface reducing the risk for recurrence especially for
the foot region or wounds over the hard bone. Also compared to other modalities
for healing such as NPWT or other conservative care, using flaps for reconstruction
allows a faster healing process minimizing the time needed for care. One must be
prudent in deciding which approach is adequate for each wound. Most likely,
wounds that are deep, complex and large can be considered for flap reconstruction
as mentioned before in this chapter.
General success rate for these patients were same for other chronic wounds
whereas the diabetic foot had slightly lower success rate. However, limb salvage
from diabetic foot using microsurgical approach showed success comparable to
non-diabetic patients (Fitzgerald O’Connor et al. 2011; Hong 2006; Colen 1987;
Searles and Colen 1991; Shenaq and Dinh 1989; Oishi et al. 1993). Meta-analysis
of a systematic review of free tissue transfer in 528 diabetes patients in 18 studies
showed that flap survival was 92% and limb salvage rate of 83.4% over a
28 months average follow-up period. This study indicates that free tissue transfer in
the management of non-traumatic lower extremity wounds in patients with diabetes
may avoid amputations (Fitzgerald O'Connor et al. 2011). In our previous study, we
showed similar findings using microsurgery which achieved an overall flap survival
rate of 91.7%, limb salvage rate of 84.9% and 5-year-survival of 86.8% (Oh et al.
2013). Now with the introduction of supermicrosurgery, we are able to use small
vessels to perform recons truction even on the patients with poor vascular status. In
our recent publication of 95 cases which used the supermicrosurgery approach, we
noted 9 total loss and 12 cases of minor complication (Suh et al. 2016b). Thirty-four
patients had one or less major artery after intervention but only had 4 cases of total
failure. The lack of major vessels was not a significant risk for failure thus supporting our approach of using collateral vessels for recipients. Overall in this series,
flap survival rate was 90.5% and overall limb salvage rate was 93.7% (Suh et al.
2016b). This approach extends the possibility for reconstruction in patients with
severe ischemic diabetic foot.
In chronic osteomyelitis, our experience of microsurgical reconstruction using
perforator flaps showed a flap survival of 95.8% (Hong et al. 2017). The treatment
has similar principles that requires aggressive surgical debridement removing all
fibrotic and ischemic bone and soft tissue surrounding the wound that impedes
antibiotic delivery followed by de finitive reconstruction with the objective of
restoring ambulatory function (Attinger and Bulan 2001). In the last 3 decades,
Surgical Flaps in Wound Healing—An Update on Evidence-Based Management 259
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
major surgical advancements to provide vascularized coverage to infected bone had
brought recurrence rates in chronic osteomyelitis down from 30% to10-15%
(Shannon et al. 1973; Anthony et al. 1991). Reconstruction can be complex
applying combine flaps to obliterate the dead space, reconstruct the bone defect and
resurface the skin defect. With multidisciplinary approach using proper antibiotics
and surgical approach, the recurrence rate after reconstruction was 8.3%, the primary remission rate was 91.6%, the secondary remission rate was 98.3%, and the
amputation rate was 1% in our series (Hong et al. 2017). Significant predictors of
recurrence were peripheral vascular disease and major vessel compromise, which
had 5.1 times higher odds of recurrence (Hong et al. 2017).
Unstable scars frequently go through a wax and wane progress of healing for
ulcers. It may also cause severe contracture as the scars mature during healing. It
hinders the daily activities of the patient as epithelialization can easily breakdown
despite minimal stimuli. This occurs due to the lack of padding and durability of
normal cutaneous structure. In cases of severe contracture, there is an absolute lack
of normal skin after release. When there is extensive defect after removal of
unstable scar, microsurgical reconstruct ion is required. The principle of aggressive
debridement followed by definitive surgery is applied and this problem can be
overcome. The same can be said for radiation induced scars. The outcome may be
similar to any nondiabetic microsurgical reconstruction.
Conclusion
Along with multidisciplinary approach and good principle of wounds care, the
repair and restoration strategies using flaps and microsurgery has widened the
possibilities for limb salvage from complex acute and chronic wounds.
References
Abdelfattah U, Power HA, Song S, Min K, Suh HP, Hong JP. Algorithm for free perforator flap
selection in lower extremity reconstruction based on 563 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144
(5):1202–13.
Allahabadi S, Haroun KB, Musher DM, Lipsky BA, Barshes NR. Consensus on surgical aspects of
managing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2016;7:30079.
Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Alpert BS. The muscle flap in the treatment of chronic lower extremity
osteomyelitis: results in patients over 5 years after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88
(2):311–8.
Apelqvist J. Wound healing in diabetes. Outcome and costs. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1998;15
(1):21–39.
Aragon-Sanchez J, Lipsky BA. Modern management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The when,
how and why of conservative approaches. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018;16(1):35–50.
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system.
The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation. Diabetes Care.
1998;21(5):855–9.
260 J. P. Hong and A. Datli
Attinger CE, Bulan EJ. Debridement. The key initial first step in wound healing. Foot Ankle Clin.
2001;6(4):627–60.
Badia JM, Torres JM, Tur C, Sitges-Serra A. Saline wound irrigation reduces the postoperative
infection rate in guinea pigs. J Surg Res. 1996;63(2):457–9.
Behan FC. The keystone design perforator Island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg.
2003;73(3):112–20.
Bild DE, Selby JV, Sinnock P, Browner WS, Braveman P, Showstack JA. Lower-extremity
amputation in people with diabetes. Epidemiol Prevention Diabetes Care. 1989;12(1):24–31.
Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I, et al. Multicentre randomised
controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a bypass-surgery-first versus a
balloon-angioplasty-first revascularisation strategy for severe limb ischaemia due to infrain-
guinal disease. The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial.
Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(14):1–210, iii–iv.
Brocco E, Ninkovic S, Marin M, Whisstock C, Bruseghin M, Boschetti G, et al. Diabetic foot
management: multidisciplinary approach for advanced lesion rescue. J Cardiovasc Surg
(torino). 2018;59(5):670–84.
Brownrigg JR, Apelqvist J, Bakker K, Schaper NC, Hinchliffe RJ. Evidence-based management of
PAD & the diabetic foot. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(6):673–81.
Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS, Caputo GM. The non-healing diabetic foot wound: fact or fiction?
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1998;44(3A Suppl):6S–12S; discussion 3S.
Chang N, Mathes SJ. Comparison of the effect of bacterial inoculation in musculocutaneous and
random-pattern flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70(1):1–10.
Chen KT, Mardini S, Chuang DC, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Lin YT, et al. Timing of presentation of
the first signs of vascular compromise dictates the salvage outcome of free flap transfers. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(1):187–95.
Cho MJ, Kwon JG, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. The role of duplex ultrasound in microsurgical
reconstruction: review and technical considerations. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36(7):514–21.
Clemens MW, Attinger CE. Angiosomes and wound care in the diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Clin.
2010;15(3):439–64.
Colen LB. Limb salvage in the patient with severe peripheral vascular disease: the role of
microsurgical free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79(3):389–95.
Darling JD, McCallum JC, Soden PA, Korepta L, Guzman RJ, Wyers MC, et al. Results for
primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening
ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(2):466–75.
Datli A, Suh H, Kim YC, Choi DH, Hong JPJ. Free-style deepithelialized propeller flaps: an ideal
local flap to obliterate wounds with dead space. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(3):
e1249.
Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology
and recent trends in the United States. South Med J. 2002;95(8):875–83.
Endara M, Masden D, Goldstein J, Gondek S, Steinberg J, Attinger C. The role of chronic and
perioperative glucose management in high-risk surgical closures: a case for tighter glycemic
control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):996–1004.
Fitzgerald O’Connor EJ, Vesely M, Holt PJ, Jones KG, Thompson MM, Hinchliffe RJ. A systematic
review of free tissue transfer in the management of non-traumatic lower extremity wounds in
patients with diabetes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(3):391–9.
Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care (new
Rochelle). 2015;4(9):560–82.
Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(7):1503–4.
Granick M, Boykin J, Gamelli R, Schultz G, Tenenhaus M. Toward a common language: surgical
wound bed preparation and debridement. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(Suppl 1):S1–10.
Holstein P, Ellitsgaard N, Olsen BB, Ellitsgaard V. Decreasing incidence of major amputations in
people with diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000;43(7):844–7.
Surgical Flaps in Wound Healing—An Update on Evidence-Based Management 261
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Hong JP. Reconstruction of the diabetic foot using the anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(5):1599–608.
Hong JP. The Color Duplex Ultrasound: The Reconstructive Surgeon’s Stethoscope. J Reconstr
Microsurg. 2022;38(3):169.
Hong JP, Hallock GG. Our Premise for Lower Extremity Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg.
2021;37(1):1.
Hong JP, Koshima I. Using perforators as recipient vessels (supermicrosurgery) for free flap
reconstruction of the knee region. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(3):291–3.
Hong JP, Oh TS. An algorithm for limb salvage for diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39
(3):341–52.
Hong JP, Chung YK, Chung SH. The effect of prostaglandin E1 versus ischemia-reperfusion
injury of musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47(3):316–21.
Hong JPJ, Goh TLH, Choi DH, Kim JJ, Suh HS. The efficacy of perforator flaps in the treatment of
chronic osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):179–88.
Hong JP, Park CJ, Suh HP. Importance of Vascularity and Selecting the Recipient Vessels of
Lower Extremity Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37(1):83– 8.
Hong JP, Hur J, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. The use of color duplex ultrasound for local perforator
flaps in the extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022a;38(3):233–7.
Hong JP, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. Using duplex ultrasound for recipient vessel selection.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022b;38(3):200–5.
Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional
model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(Suppl 1):205S–12S.
Jin SJ, Suh HP, Lee J, Hwang JH, Hong JPJ, Kim YK. Lipo-prostaglandin E1 increases immediate
arterial maximal flow velocity of free flap in patients undergoing reconstructive surgery. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(1):40–5.
Kedar DJ, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Propeller flaps in the posterior trunk. Semin Plast Surg.
2020;34(3):176–83.
Knox KR, Datiashvili RO, Granick MS. Surgical wound bed preparation of chronic and acute
wounds. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34(4):633–41.
Krishnan N, Becker DF. Characterization of a bifunctional PutA homologue from Bradyrhizobium
japonicum and identification of an active site residue that modulates proline reduction of the
flavin adenine dinucleotide cofactor. Biochemistry. 2005;44(25):9130–9.
Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, et al. Timing of pedicle
thrombosis and flap loss after free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1230–3.
Neligan P. Plastic surgery, 4th edn. London, Elsevier; 2018. 6 volumes p.
Nunan R, Harding KG, Martin P. Clinical challenges of chronic wounds: searching for an optimal
animal model to recapitulate their complexity. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(11):1205–13.
Oh TS, Hallock G, Hong JP. Freestyle propeller flaps to reconstruct defects of the posterior trunk:
a simple approach to a difficult problem. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(1):79–82.
Oh TS, Lee HS, Hong JP. Diabetic foot reconstruction using free
flaps increases 5-year-survival
rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(2):243–50.
Oishi SN, Levin LS, Pederson WC. Microsurgical management of extremity wounds in diabetics
with peripheral vascular disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(3):485–92.
Park SW, Oh TS, Eom JS, Sun YC, Suh HS, Hong JP. Freestyle multiple propeller flap
reconstruction (jigsaw puzzle approach) for complicated back defects. J Reconstr Microsurg.
2015;31(4):261–7.
Park JY, Suh HP, Kwon JG, Yu J, Lee J, Hwang JH, et al. Epidural Anesthesia and Arterial
Maximal Flow Velocity of Free Flap in Patients Having Microvascular Lower Extremity
Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(2):496–505.
Patel GK. The role of nutrition in the management of lower extremity wounds. Int J Low Extrem
Wounds. 2005;4(1):12–22.
262 J. P. Hong and A. Datli
Power HA, Cho J, Kwon JG, Abdelfattah U, Pak CJ, Suh HP, et al. Are Perforators Reliable as
Recipient Arteries in Lower Extremity Reconstruction? Analysis of 423 Free Perforator Flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(3):750–60.
Rainer C, Schwabegger AH, Meirer R, Perkmann R, Ninkovic M. Microsurgical management of
the diabetic foot. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19(8):543–53.
Richmond NA, Maderal AD, Vivas AC. Evidence-based management of common chronic lower
extremity ulcers. Dermatol Ther. 2013;26(3):187–96.
Searles JM Jr, Colen LB. Foot reconstruction in diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular
insufficiency. Clin Plast Surg. 1991;18(3):467–83.
Shannon JG, Woolhouse FM, Eisinger PJ. The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis by saucerization
and immediate skin grafting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;96:98–107.
Shenaq SM, Dinh TA. Foot salvage in arteriolosclerotic and diabetic patients by free flaps after
vascular bypass: report of two cases. Microsurgery. 1989;10(4):310–4.
Shestak KC, Hendricks DL, Webster MW. Indirect revascularization of the lower extremity by
means of microvascular free-muscle flap–a preliminary report. J Vasc Surg. 1990;12(5):581–5.
Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y, Powers H, Suh YC, Christoffi P, et al. Direction of Flap Rotation in
Propeller Flaps: Does It Really Matter? J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019;35(8):549–56.
Sonntag BV, Murphy RX, Jr., Chernofsky MA, Chowdary RP. Microvascular steal phenomenon
in lower extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34(3):336–9; discussion 9–40.
Suh HP, Hong JP. The role of reconstructive microsurgery in treating lower-extremity chronic
wounds. Int Wound J. 2019;16(4):951–9.
Suh HS, Oh TS, Hong JP. Innovations in diabetic foot reconstruction using supermicrosurgery.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016a;32(Suppl 1):275–80.
Suh HS, Oh TS, Lee HS, Lee SH, Cho YP, Park JR, et al. A New Approach for Reconstruction of
Diabetic Foot Wounds Using the Angiosome and Supermicrosurgery Concept. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2016b;138(4):702e—9e.
Wax MK, Rosenthal E. Etiology of late free flap failures occurring after hospital discharge.
Laryngoscope. 2007;117(11):1961–3.
Wraight PR, Lawrence SM, Campbell DA, Colman PG. Creation of a multidisciplinary, evidence
based, clinical guideline for the assessment, investigation and management of acute diabetes
related foot complications. Diabet Med. 2005;22(2):127–36.
Wound Measurement is an Essential
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Part of Wound Management
Valentina Dini, Giammarco Granieri, Alessandra Michelucci,
and Marco Romanelli
Abstract
Wound assessment is an essential part of wound management to significantly
increase the quality of the pathway for patients with ulcerative diseases.
Nowadays, these pathologies are still an important comorbidity afflicting the
whole world in relevant epidemiological rates. Our lives are increasingly driven
by technology. In this chapter we have reviewed the most promising imaging
methods to improve the prognosis of wounds as well as the long-term quality of
life of these patients. Our intent is to provide a comprehensive overview of new
technologies and their potential and established use in wound care.
Keywords
Skin AssessmentWound size analysisHyperspectral imaging (HSI)Laser
doppler imaging (LDI)
spectroscopy (NIRS)
tomography (OCT)
(US)
(UHFUS)
V. Dini G. Granieri A. Michelucci M. Romanelli (&)
Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126 Pisa, Italy
e-mail: m.romanelli@med.unipi.it
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
R. Mani (ed.), Chronic Wound Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26110-7_13
High frequency ultrasound (HFUS)Ultra high frequency ultrasound
Fluorescence imagingConfocal microscopyUltrasound
Laser speckle imaging (LSI)Near-infrared
ThermographyVideomicroscopyOptical coherence
263
264 V. Dini et al.
Introduction
Imaging instruments have revolutionized the history of medicine from the optical
microscope to modern methods we are able to study the human organism by
exploiting waves and sound, electromagnetic with good submillim etre definition.
Particularly in the medical field, non-invasive imaging methods are gaining popularity because of their versatility and patient safety features. Our lives are driven
by technology but nowadays, chronic diabetic foot (DF) ulcers, venous ulcers,
pressure ulcers (PUs), ischemic ulcers, and other atypical lower-extremity wounds
continue to be major therapeutic challenges.
For some time now, many imaging methods developed in other fields of medicine have taken root in dermatology and thanks to the development of modern
software are limited not only to the correct follow-up of the lesions but also provide
prognostic and therapeutic indications with increasing accuracy. An effective and
accurate monitoring of skin lesions should be performed by measuring in an
objective, precise, and reproducible way the complete status and evolution of the
wound (Romanelli et al. 2007).
Some of these systems may in the future be equipped with artificial intelligence
software and smartphone capability so that they could better guide physicians and
nurses in the correct management of patients affected by ulcers (Li et al. 2020).
By increasing the use of imaging methods that allow quantitative analysis, it will
be possible to conduct more accurate and standardized studies to guide wound care
research.
Even in wound care, imaging has made great strides since the first outlines of
wounds were drawn by hand on sheets of acetate. The latest developed technologies
can also allow for the prediction of the probability of ulcer occurrence. Exploring
wounds not only at visible light but also at invisible wavelengths to the human eye,
we are allowed to investigate bacterial species sited in lesions, invisible otherwise
(Janowska et al. 2021).
To date, research is increasingly focusing on methods that allow for etiological
analysis and provide reproducible quantitative indications through dev ices that
integrate multiple imaging methods and allow for multiparametric analysis of
lesions. Instrument miniaturization and portability are undoubtedly other key goals
in wound imaging research.
Modern software allows us to not only identify the depth and the morphological
characteristics, but also to make three-dimensional reconstructions through algorithms (Lucas et al. 2021).
In this chapter various imaging methods from the most traditional to the most
modern, focusing on the role of wound care in the study of skin micro vascularization are addressed.
Despite the increasing accuracy of the imaging methods, many therapies can still
fail in terms of recurrence of wounds, with everything that involves the patient
quality of life (QoL) towards health professionals, and the health system
, due to
Wound Measurement is an Essential Part of Wound Management 265
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
many gaps in diagnostic methods that do not yet allow for an optimal differential
diagnosis involving diagnostic-therapeutic delays.
Finally, most of the digital imaging methods have allowed for the correct
management of complicated patients from centres of world excellence for this
pathology even using remote devices; like in these years of emergency due to the
pandemic, telemedicine has had a very important role due to the impossibility of
examining patients in close range (Kim et al. 2003).
In this chapter we will talk about “wound imaging” to describe the modalities in
which wound imaging can be differentiated from “wound monitoring”, term that
refers to methods of monitoring the evolution of the wound, and “wound assessment”, that encompasses all methods of assessing the status of wounds (Li et al.
2020).
Skin Assessment
Wound Size Analysis
The digitization of imaging methods has certainly revolutionized wound management. Through the acquisition of digital images, it is possible to capture details that
can escape the naked eye. Digital images are the most cost-effective (Treuillet et al.
2009), non-invasive, and the easiest approach for high-resolution wound recording
and size measurement (Queen and Harding 2020). Technology-based evidence of
wound healing can be derived from dimensional assessments of lesion area, wound
perimeter or axial length, and, in the case of neuropathic diabetic wounds, volume.
There is demonstrable benefit when caregivers have wound measurement data
available (Mani et al. 2016). The use of technology in wound measurement was
given a level of evidence and recommendation 1A by the consensus to Optimizing
Technology Use for Chronic Lower-Extremity Wound Healing.
The very high resolution, that modern digital images have reached, allows us to
have a very accurate analysis, not only of the lesion morphology, but also the
acquisition of colour images, that provides a qualitative estimate of the various
types of tissues present in the lesion and in the peri-wound skin (Jones and
Plassmann 2000). Due to its reliability, the acquisition of digital photographs has
become the gold standard for testing new imaging methods. A disadvantage of this
method, especially those performed with cheaper systems, is the inability to assess
lesion depth in two-dimensions. Without the depth, volumetric calculation of the
lesion becomes impossible.
Modern systems provide the depth parameter by means of algorithms for red,
blue, green (RGB) images processed using image-processing algorithms (segmentation, edge detection, colour processing, active contour, and volumetric
information), allowing accurate boundary delineation and enabling
three-dimensional reconstruction (Li et al. 2020). This tool is recognize d daily for
266 V. Dini et al.
its versatility in clinical practices, it is the reference method to compare new wound
imaging devices.
Through this a completely non-invasive and safe method for the patient it is
possible to draw a multitude of parameters useful in the diagnostic-therapeutic path
of the lesion. In fact, digital imaging methods provide a qualitat ive and quantitative
measure of the lesion in an accurate way. Using digital images, it is possible to
automatically or semi-automatically establish the exact size of the skin lesions in
each spatial axis, but the quantitative analysis does not stop only at the estimate of
the size of the wounds (Fig. 1) (Foltynski et al. 2013). By implementing digital
photography with special analysis software, and the integration of technologies with
accurate accuracy such as laser scanning systems, it is possible to perform a
qualitative and quantitative analysis of the wound bed and wound edges to convert
even colour scales into reproducible qualitative-quantitative measures, e.g., it is
possible to quantify necrosis, fibrin, rate of re-epithelialization, or a particular type
of infection, providing a kind of global overview of the wound with reliable and
reproducible results even over time and for different ulcers (Romanelli et al. 2008;
Wannous et al. 2011). By means of digital planning it is possible to provide a
multiparametric analysis of the lesion by studying the margins (whether regular or
irregular), the chrom atic changes (indications of hyperaemia, necrosis or hyperkeratosis) and the newly formed epithelial tissue in advance.
Wound photography and the digital wound plan can therefore provide valuable
assistance to the clinician in terms of reducing the statistical error in serial measurements. Digital photography, however, provides neither information on the
pathophysiology or the biochemistry of the wound. With the various analyses and
the use of statistical models it will also be possible to predict the trend of chronic
wounds by monitoring the trend over time.
Standardization of any imaging method is the best way to consent for the
reproducibility of this method. To meet this need, American Professional Wound
Care Association has provided many useful guidelines to follow when acquiring
images of wounds (American Professional Wound Care Association 2019):
Fig. 1 Semi-automatic digital wound size analysis with laser scanner
Wound Measurement is an Essential Part of Wound Management 267
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
1. Use the same digital camera for successive images.
2. Use the same image resolution settings on the digital camera (several are
available).
3. Use the same light source, intensity, and angle.
4. Have the camera at the same angle, distance, rotation, and height from the
wound.
5. Choose either pre- or post-debridement for all images in a sequence.
6. Select the same magnification for the digital camera lens (“ zoom”).
7. Choose a naming convention and put case identification and number or date in
the image (this will not be required for a full digital solution).
8. Choose image archive software that will allow keyword searches and audio tags
with images.
9. Have the wound in the same relative position as previous images.
10. Use “fiducial” reference markers wherever possible to achieve consistency (i.e.,
patient code, date, scale).
Two other authors Sperring and Baker provided 10 tips for wound photography:
1. Use a digital camera owned by your place of work
2. Set the time and date on the camera
3. Get the light optimal
4. Take the first photograph of patient data
5. Make the wound the only focus
6. Standardise the views taken of the wound
7. Get the angle right to take a proportional image
8. Establish the wound location for the viewer
9. Close-up images establish detail for the viewer
10. Securely save and store the images
Consistent, critical components in both include the importance of light and angle
of capture. Both are imperative to ensure the photograph is as close to reality as
possible. This is especially important for any wound measurement (Queen and
Harding 2020).
Hyperspectral Imaging
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-invasive optical imaging method, based on
acquiring a series of continuous wavelength images to reveal the absorption
spectroscopic characteristics of tissue components by recording the intensity of
scattered light reflected from ulcerated tissue. Through this method, objective
information on the phenology, physiology, and biochemistry of wound patterns can
be obtained (Xu et al. 2012).
HSI can quantify oxygenated haemoglobin and deoxygenated haemoglobin
because they are the main tissue chromophores. With this technique we can
quantify wound oxygenation and perfusion parameters (Khaodhiar et al. 2007;
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025