Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 1010 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
Part X
On Asymmetry in Sphincters
X
Chapter 34
Chapter 34 Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innerva-
469
Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innervation and Its Potential Role in the
34
Pathogenesis of Fecal and Urinary Incontinence – Report from the EU-sponsored Research Project OASIS (On Asymmetry In Sphincters)
Paul Enck,Fernando Azpiroz,Roberto Merletti
Contents
34.1 Assessment of Pelvic Floor Innervation
by Conventional Neurophysiological Techniques . . . . 470
34.1.1 Neurophysiology of the Pelvic Floor . . . . . . . . . . . 470
34.1.2 Unilateral Pudendal Neuropathy – Fact or Fiction? . . . 470
34.1.3 Evidence for Functional Asymmetry
of Pelvic Floor Innervation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
34.1.3.1 Intraoperative Monitoring of Pudendal Sensory
and Motor Pathways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
34.1.3.2 Central (Cortical) Representation of Motor
and Sensory Functions of the Pelvic Floor . . . . . . . . 472
34.1.3.3 Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Recording . . . . . . 472
34.1.4 Clinical Relevance of Asymmetry in Patients
with Incontinence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473
34.2 The Project OASIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474
34.2.1 Multiple-Electrode Array Surface EMG
to Study Sphincter Innervation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474
34.2.2 Background of Surface EMG Technology . . . . . . . . . 474
34.2.3 Muscle Anatomy and Concepts Behind
the Array Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475
34.2.4 An Anal Probe with Multiple Electrode Arrays . . . . . . 476
34.2.5 Signal Interpretation and Development
of Sphincter Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478
34.2.5.1 Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478
34.3 First Results of the OASIS Technique to Study Healthy,
Continent Subjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
34.3.1 EMG Signal Amplitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
34.3.2 Noninvasive Assessment
of Muscle Anatomical Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
34.3.3 Detection of Single Motor Unit Activities . . . . . . . . . 480
34.3.4 Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity . . . . 482
34.3.5 Differences in Sphincter Innervation
Between Men and Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 484
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488
34
470
Paul Enck, Fernando Azpiroz, Roberto Merletti
34.1 Assessment of Pelvic Floor Innervation by Conventional Neurophysiological Techniques
34.1.1 Neurophysiology of the Pelvic Floor
Incontinence to urine and/or stool can derive from a variety of clinical conditions, some of which are primary events where incontinence is an unavoidable consequence of the disease such as bladder and/or anal/rectal cancer or inflammation of the respec­tive storage organs. In many systemic disorders, incontinence occurs as the conse­quence of direct involvement of neural pathways to and from the bladder and anorec­tum such as in multiple sclerosis,diabetes mellitus, and other diseases.Finally,if inju­ry of the continence organs occurs with surgery (e.g., episiotomy) or trauma (e.g.,de­livery), incontinence may be the consequence (Hinninghofen and Enck 2003).In many cases, however, incontinence appears to be idiopathic, that is without an immediate preceding event, and is usually attributed to age-related degeneration of the neuro­muscular apparatus maintaining continence or to traumatic events in the past (e.g., childbirth). As neurophysiological diagnostic testing has revealed pathological find­ings in many of these patients, idiopathic incontinence is frequently also labeled neu­rogenic (Kiff and Swash 1984).
Except for the determination of the terminal motor latency of the pudendal nerve (PNTML) by a less invasive technique (Kiff and Swash 1984), where a glove-mounted surface electrode is used to stimulate the pudendal nerve through the rectal wall, and evoked responses are recorded from the anal sphincter by another pair of electrodes at the finger base, the neurophysiology of pelvic floor functions (Vodusek 2004) has nev­er been a clinical routine tool used by many investigators and in many patients. This is because needle EMG is an invasive and painful procedure for the patient and requires a great deal of experience on the side of the clinician.
Besides PNTML recording, surface EMG has only been used for assessment of the latencies of corticoanal afferent and efferent pathways – for the whole pathway as well as for fractions thereof – via recordings of somatosensory and motor evoked poten­tials (Enck et al. 1992),and mainly for research purposes only.
Consequently, very little is known about the normal neurophysiology of pelvic floor innervation in healthy volunteers,and contribution of its neuropathology to the pathogenesis of fecal and or urinary incontinence. This is especially true for the ques­tion of whether innervation of the pelvic floor sphincters is symmetrical or asymmet­rical in nature even in healthy volunteers, and whether this can be a contributing fac­tor to the occurrence of incontinence symptoms.
34.1.2 Unilateral Pudendal Neuropathy – Fact or Fiction?
Routine clinical experience with recording of PNTML (Kiff and Swash 1984) will occa­sionally result in differences in potential amplitudes and latencies, which have been at­tributed by some authors to unilateral pudendal neuropathy but were assumed to be due to technical difficulties to achieve a good electrode-to-pudendal nerve contact on both sides during rectal digital examination by others.
Of all patients with pelvic floor problems undergoing PNTML in a study by Sang­wan et al. (1996),8% had no response on both sides and 14% responses from one side only. In the remaining patients, 61% had normal and 39% had abnormal PNTML; of all
Chapter 34 Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innervation
patients with abnormal PNTML, 28% were delayed on both sides,and 71% on one side only. In total, one-quarter of patients had what the authors called unilateral pudendal neuropathy.In a similar but larger report from another group (Lubowski et al. 1988), 15% of PNTML investigations showed delayed or missing response on one side only.
However, another explanation for this phenomenon would be that despite its ana­tomical symmetry, pudendal nerve function may also be asymmetrical in some sub­jects, as is the case with other bilaterally innervated organs (e.g., the esophagus) (Hamdy et al.1997). If this holds true,is may carry significant clinical implications spe­cifically in those subjects with asymmetry of innervation, e.g., in case of unilateral trauma (Enck et al. 1996).A research hypothesis based on this assumption is illustrat­ed in Fig. 34.1 and was the basis of subsequently conducted research.
34.1.3 Evidence for Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innervation
Three approaches have been taken to evaluate functional asymmetry of pelvic floor innervation in healthy subjects and in patients.
34.1.3.1 Intraoperative Monitoring of Pudendal Sensory
and Motor Pathways
Deletis et al. (1992) investigated children in whom individual dorsal root action poten­tials from the S1–S3 roots were recorded intraoperatively after electrical stimulation of the dorsal penile or clitoral nerves, in preparation for surgery within the cauda equi­na. In most patients, pudendal afferent activity was present in S2 and S3 bilaterally; in some, the afferent activity was confined to a single root bilaterally, and in one,to a sin­gle root on one side. No lesion of the roots or rootlets carrying significant afferent ac­tivity was created during the rhizotomy, and no dysfunction in micturition resulted.In a replication study by the same groups (Huang et al. 1997), the pudendal afferent dis­tribution was often confined to a single level in 18% of the patients or even to a single root in 7.6%. None of the patients thus mapped developed long-term bowel or bladder complications when the dominant root was saved from rhizotomy. Recently, Deletis and co-workers (Krzan et al.1999) compared the radicular distribution of anal and pe-
471
Fig. 34.1. A research hypothesis of the clinical relevance of functional pudendal nerve asymme­try in case of unilateral trauma, i.e.,the same trauma can have entirely different consequences
34
472
Paul Enck, Fernando Azpiroz, Roberto Merletti
nile/clitoral afferents in 22 of these children and found that in more than half of the patients,the main carrier was identical,while in 41% the main carrier of anal afferents was caudal to that of penile/clitoral afferents. In 9% the main and only carrier of anal afferents was a single root.Dissociation of fecal and urinary incontinence could be ex­plained by different primary sacral carrier roots for anal and penile/clitoral afferents.
Sacral spinal root pacemaker implantation is a new technique in treatment of fecal incontinence but requires intraoperative decision as to which two of the six potential­ly functional sacral spinal nerves should carry the electrodes. Matzel et al. (1999) in­vestigated incontinent patients undergoing evaluation for chronic sacral spinal nerve stimulation and continent patients undergoing testing for treatment of neurogenic bladder.Both in continent as well as in incontinent patients,the dominant level was of­ten not symmetrical, and in many cases,the highest responses obtained from left- and right-side root stimulation were not on the same level.
34.1.3.2 Central (Cortical) Representation of Motor and Sensory Functions of the Pelvic Floor
Topographic cortical mapping of both cerebral hemispheres was performed by Turn­bull et al. (1999) in healthy subjects by applying suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to individual points on a scalp grid centered over the vertex and then recording the electromyographic responses from the external anal sphincter, rec­tum, and tibialis anterior muscles. Cortical mapping showed that the anal responses were bilaterally represented on the superior motor cortex of both cerebral hemi­spheres; a similar topography was found for the rectal responses. A similar study by another group that was undertaken (Witscher et al. 1998) in healthy volunteers showed latencies and motor thresholds to be similar between the dominant and the nondom­inant hemisphere, but the area over the nondominant hemisphere was significantly larger compared to the dominant one. In two out of ten cases, the intraindividual left : right area of activation was asymmetric (>30% difference), in one case each the left or the right side was dominant. This distribution was not related to handedness.
To compare cortical responses following electrical stimulation of the human anal canal to responses after stimulation of median and tibial nerves, Stottrop et al. (1998) employed magnetoencephalography (MEG). Electrical stimuli were applied to the anal canal, and to median and tibial nerves at different repetition rates,using below­pain-threshold intensities.Magnetic brain responses were averaged time-locked to the stimuli. Magnetic responses to stimulation of the anal canal were explained by unilat­eral (five subjects) or bilateral (two subjects) sources; at least in a subgroup of volun­teers this representation is asymmetrical.
34.1.3.3 Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Recording
As outlined above, individual differences between the left and right pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) can occasionally be found in healthy humans. This was first described as normal in healthy subjects by Hamdy et al.(1998).When they in­vestigated healthy subjects following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) condi­tioning of the motor pathway before applying PNTML stimuli, right or left pudendal nerve stimulation evoked anal responses of similar latencies but with significant asymmetric amplitudes in six of eight subjects (Hamdy et al.1999).
Chapter 34 Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innervation
To explore whether muscular function of the external anal sphincter (EAS) is sym­metrical or asymmetrical in healthy volunteers, healthy volunteers were investigated by needle EMG of the anal sphincter muscle (Middelsdorf et al. 1998),and significant intraindividual asymmetries of EMAP amplitudes were found in approximately one­third of cases. None of the differences found were directly related to gender and age of the subjects.
In summary, there is sufficient empirical evidence to assume that the left-to-right ratio of pelvic floor functions is asymmetrical in a subgroup of volunteers and/or pa­tients; based on the preliminary data cited above, this fraction may be about 20%, while in the remaining, the function may be symmetrical. It is currently open to dis­cussion whether this asymmetry is cortical in nature, or whether any cortical sign of asymmetry only reflects peripheral dominance of pudendal pathway utilization. This needs to be studied in more detail in the future.
34.1.4 Clinical Relevance of Asymmetry in Patients with Incontinence
Left and right side anal surface EMG (S-EMG) recordings by means of a modified anal plug electrode and a conventional S-EMG system was used to assess the innervation of the external anal sphincter at both sides in the anal canal separately in Wietek et al. (2002). Three cohorts were studied: nulliparous women in the third trimester (Study
1), primiparae within 6 months after nontraumatic vaginal delivery (Study 2), and women after childbirth-related third- or fourth-degree perineal tear 6–12 months postpartum (Study 3). Approximately 40% of nulliparous women reported signs of mild fecal incontinence; however, relative asymmetry was neither correlated to symp­tom severity nor to manometric measures (Study 1).In Study 2, 40% of women had an episiotomy performed, of which one-third developed severe incontinence.The associ­ation between asymmetry and incontinence did not reach significance level; however, comparison of pre and postpartum measures of S-EMG showed high reproducibility within subjects. In study 3,approximately 40% of women reported moderate to severe incontinence. Asymmetry and symptom severity were significantly correlated. Ma­nometry revealed a significant negative correlation between relative asymmetry and squeeze pressure but not with resting pressure. It was concluded that functional asym­metry of anal sphincter innervation is associated with incontinence symptoms, but only after childbirth-related injuries (trauma) (Wietek et al.2002).
With the same technique, a large series of consecutive patients with fecal inconti­nence were investigated during routine diagnostic work-up of an incontinence outpa­tient clinic (Hinninghofen et al. 2003) to assess the functional innervation of the left­and right-side external anal sphincter (EAS). Besides being investigated by mass sur­face EMG, all patients underwent conventional clinical diagnostic work-up including anorectal manometry,endoanal ultrasound, defecography, and other routines.A sym­metry index was computed (SI=mean(left-right)/max(left,right) of the EMG ampli­tude), defining the relative S-EMG amplitude symmetry between 0=symmetric and 1=asymmetric. A subgroup of 30% of the patients were regarded as asymmetric. More women than men were identified as asymmetric, and the association between female gender and asymmetry status was significant. Among the (female) patients with asymmetric innervation, two out of three had a history of deliveries. The symmetry status (SI) between women with childbirth was significantly higher than in those without, but the degree of asymmetry was not related to the number of childbirths.
473
34
474
Paul Enck, Fernando Azpiroz, Roberto Merletti
Asymmetry degree was also correlated with the results of diagnostic work-up to identify major determinants and consequences of relative asymmetry,but without the clinical investigators knowing the results of symmetry assessment. In both men and women, a significant and negative correlation of SI to the EAS squeeze pressure was found,and a positive association with sphincter defects detected during endosonogra­phy. Association with EAS squeeze pressure was stronger in men than in women, but in men, the SI was also correlated positively to resting pressure.
The symmetry status (SI) also correlated with the degree of incontinence, as as­sessed by the Wexner Score: patients with severe incontinence were significantly more frequently asymmetric than those with mild incontinence.
Functional asymmetry of EAS innervation appears to vary from physiological to pathophysiological grades, and in the latter case, results in decreased squeeze pres­sures of the EAS. However, overall moderate to weak correlations indicate other im­portant factors contributing to symptom development and severity on the one hand and asymmetry of sphincter innervation on the other.
34.2 The Project OASIS
34.2.1 Multiple-Electrode Array Surface EMG to Study Sphincter Innervation
While the above-cited literature gives preliminary evidence to the clinical relevance of functional asymmetry of sphincter innervation, important questions remain, which can only be resolved with a new technology that allows screening of pelvic floor inner­vation in large patient and volunteer cohorts.This in itself excludes conventional neu­rophysiological techniques based on needle EMG from this task. On the other hand, surface EMG has so far only been used to evaluate within-subject changes of pelvic floor function with therapy,e.g., after biofeedback training (Enck 1993), or latencies of somatosensory and somatomotor responses following central, spinal, or peripheral stimulation of the pathways (Kiff and Swash 1984; Sangwan et al. 1996; Swash 2002; Vodusek 2004). It is not regarded as an appropriate technique to diagnose pelvic floor innervation and its dysfunctions (Pullman et al. 2000).
A recently described new technology using multielectrode arrays (MEA) to study individual motor unit action potentials (MUAP) from large muscles in the body’s pe­riphery (Merletti et al. 1999a, b) was the starting point of a European Community­sponsored research project whose first results were reported recently (Hinninghofen et al. 2002; Liu et al.2002; Merletti et al.2004). It was named OASIS (On Asymmetry in Sphincters – The role of functional asymmetry in sphincter innervation for inconti­nence, QLRT-2001-00218) and included four clinical partners (from gastroenterology, surgery,gynecology, and urology), a technical partner for biomedical engineering, and two small industrial partners. It started working in January 2002 for a total of 3 years.
34.2.2 Background of Surface EMG Technology
Although the detection of surface EMG signals is relatively easy, the interpretation of the signal features for understanding physiological mechanisms and monitoring path­ological conditions is a complex task (Farina et al. 2004c).Surface EMG signals are in-
Chapter 34 Functional Asymmetry of Pelvic Floor Innervation
deed affected by many factors whose effect on the variables extracted from the signal is often not intuitive. As an example, it has been only recently recognized that EMG signals detected at different locations over the same muscle may have significantly dif­ferent amplitudes (Roy et al.1986; Jensen et al.1993), which implies that electrode loca­tion is of primary importance for comparing results (Hermes and Freriks 1997). The difficulties in interpreting results has led, in some cases, to rather strong critiques of this noninvasive technique (Haig et al. 1996; Pullman et al. 2000).
The most frequently used montage for surface EMG signal detection is the bipolar configuration, which consists in recording the difference between signals detected by two electrodes placed over the same muscle at a certain distance from each other. This detection modality has been used in many studies on the assessment of the external anal sphincter (EAS) functions (e.g., Kiesswetter 1976; Nielsen et al. 1985; O’Donnell et al. 1988; Binnie et al. 1991) with a variety of electrode shapes, sizes, and locations. Sig­nals recorded by the bipolar configuration are affected by anatomical, geometrical, physical and detection system parameters (Farina et al. 2002). Among these factors, the most relevant are the thickness of the layers interposed between the electrodes and the muscle,the tissue in-homogeneities, the length of the fibers, the interelectrode dis­tance, the shape and size of the electrodes and the relative location and orientation of the electrodes with respect to the muscle fibers. The relevance of these factors for the interpretation of results depends on the specific muscle architecture.
In recent years,efforts have overcome the limitations of the classic bipolar EMG re­cording technique (Zwarts and Stegeman 2003). The followed approach has been based on increasing the number of electrodes placed over the muscle in order to ob­tain a map of the potential distribution over the skin rather than a single local obser­vation. The use of multichannel surface EMG makes it possible to concomitantly de­tect bipolar EMG derivations from a number of locations over the muscle. The avail­ability of more than one detection point may be useful for the selection of the optimal locations to reliably extract the descriptive variables of the signal. Moreover, it pro­vides an insight into the mechanisms of generation of the signals, which may help in understanding and reducing the sources of artifact in the detection.
In the research field, multichannel surface EMG is being recorded from muscles of rather simple architecture. In the case of the EAS, the placement of many detection systems over the muscle presents important technological limitations. Recently, these limitations have been overcome, and systems for surface EMG detection from this muscle with up to 48 electrodes have been presented (Merletti et al. 2002, 2004; Enck et al. 2004a).
475
34.2.3 Muscle Anatomy and Concepts Behind the Array Detection
Muscles are composed of nearly parallel fibers that constitute the contractile structu­ral units. A motoneuron innervates a group of muscle fibers, which thus constitutes the smallest functional unit of the muscle. The motoneuron and the fibers it inner­vates are called a motor unit (MU). Muscle fibers of a MU are randomly distributed in the muscle (MU territory) and each axon reaches the fibers by the neuromuscular junctions. The pool of neuromuscular junctions of the fibers belonging to a MU is dis­tributed in a territory,termed innervation zone.
The electric impulse that propagates along the motoneuron and reaches the neuro­muscular junction determines the excitation of the muscle fiber membranes and the generation of propagating action potentials. A transmembrane current distribution
476
Paul Enck, Fernando Azpiroz, Roberto Merletti
(depolarization zone) corresponds to this potential distribution. The depolarization zones propagate without attenuation along the muscle fibers from the neuromuscular junctions to the two tendon endings (Fig. 34.2).The velocity with which the action po­tential propagates depends on the fiber diameter and type and is termed muscle fiber conduction velocity (CV). The intracellular action potentials generate and extinguish at the neuromuscular junctions and tendons, respectively. The summation of the ac­tion potentials generated by fibers innervated by a single motoneuron determines the MU action potential.
Each depolarization zone can be seen as a moving source of electric field at some depth below the skin. If the source moves along the fiber, the surface potential distri­bution will move with it. An electrode system placed on the skin will detect an inter­ference signal due to the contributions of the action potential trains of all the active MUs.Increasing contraction force results in activation (recruitment) of an increasing number of progressively larger MUs and in an increase in the frequency of activation (firing rate) of those already active (Henneman’s principle). The set of activation in­stants of a MU is termed firing pattern.
Figure 34.1a shows the characteristics of EMG signals detected at different locations along the biceps brachii muscle. The detection is performed by a number of equally spaced bipolar recordings, located along a line. This multichannel system is also known as linear electrode array (Masuda et al. 1998; Merletti et al. 1999a,2003). The ar­ray detects signals with similar shape, which propagate in two opposite directions starting from the innervation zone. The basic idea is to locate electrodes along the muscle fiber orientation covering the entire muscle length.
34
34.2.4 An Anal Probe with Multiple Electrode Arrays
Following the concepts behind the design of a linear array,in the case of the EAS it is necessary to locate electrodes around circumferences in order to follow the main mus­cle fiber orientation.As in the case of electrodes displaced longitudinally along recti­linear fibers (Fig. 34.2), the displacement of electrodes along a circumference allows the detection of the MU action potentials from their generation at the innervation zone to their extinction at the tendon endings. For this purpose, a specific probe was designed (Merletti et al. 2003,2004; Enck et al. 2004b).
The anal probe (Fig. 34.2) is composed of a rounded-tip plastic cylinder, 150 mm in length and 14 mm in diameter,holding a circumferential array of 16 equally spaced sil­ver bar electrodes, located at a distance of 20 mm from the probe tip and aligned with the probe axis.A flexible, multiwire cable encapsulated in silicone rubber is provided at the bottom of the probe,and is used to connect the circular array to a multichannel EMG amplifier.
A small plastic marking, encapsulated in the probe tip,indicates electrode 1 and the direction of numbering. A plastic fin at the end of the probe, also aligned with elec­trode 1, helps the operator in checking the orientation of the probe with respect to a fixed reference during and after insertion.
The probe is manufactured using a purposely designed machine, which injects melted biocompatible plastic (polystyrene) at a temperature of 250°C into a metallic mold, with a pressure of 120 atm and a variable injection speed. The probe can be ster­ilized chemically and is autoclavable.
By means of a multichannel electromyograph for surface EMG signals to which the probe is connected, each bipolar signal is amplified, band-pass filtered and acquired