Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 949 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
7 Мб
Скачать
302
M. Hunter and D. T. Harrington
Cardiovascular System
Severe burns create a mixed picture of shock in the first days after the injury. Due to release of inflammatory medi­ators, cardiac contractility is decreased, and cardiac output will be impaired. In addition, patients are simultaneously losing free fluid from wounds through evaporation as well as losing intravascular volume through capillary leak into tissue causing edema. In short, severely burned patients can have a mix of distributive, hypovolemic, and cardiogenic shock in the first 24–48h after their injury [3]. In this set­ting, burn resuscitation is a lifesaving intervention for the severely burned patient.
Burn Resuscitation
The most important components of burn resuscitation are quick initiation of crystalloid resuscitation and a closed loop protocol that allows intensive care providers to titrate the resuscitation to each patient. A formula like the modi­fied Brooke Formula (2mL/kg/%TBSA burned) estimates the amount of fluid required in the first 24h with half to be given in the first 8h. Providers can use this formula to calculate an initial fluid rate, but the hourly titration of the intravenous rate is based on the patient’s response includ­ing urine output. Recommended urine output is 0.5 mL/ kg/h in adults and 1.0 mL/kg/h in children. Many centers have adopted a closed loop, computer supported protocol to assist providers with resuscitation [4]. The importance of having a protocol, written or computer-assisted, that can adjust to the fluid demands of each patient cannot be over­stated. Burn patients with inhalation injury, significant electrical injury, or intoxication with alcohol or drugs will require more resuscitation [5].
14 ICU Care ofBurn Patients
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
303
Invasive Monitoring
In order to facilitate burn resuscitation, patients should have a Foley catheter placed to monitor urine output and an arterial line to monitor mean arterial pressure (MAP). Arterial lines are often needed as blood pressure cuffs can be inaccurate due to tissue edema. In addition, tissue edema can cause issues with placement and maintenance of periph­eral intravenous catheters, and some severely burned patients will require placement of a central venous catheter. These should be placed through unburned skin if possible to reduce risk of infection, but can go through burned skin if necessary [2]. Catheters placed through burned skin need to be changed more frequently than catheters placed through unburned skin.
In the first 24–48h, most severely burned patients will not have normal hemodynamics. Due to the decreased cardiac output, a MAP between 50 and 60mmHg can be tolerated if urine output and mental status are adequate. Due to the sys­temic inflammatory response to injury, severely burned patients will have a baseline tachycardia. Goal heart rate should be less than about 130 beats/minute [4].
Fluid Creep
While it is important to quickly escalate fluid resuscitation to combat shock in severely burned patients, it is equally important to consider de-escalation of fluid infusions to avoid complications from over-resuscitation as the patient’s burn shock physiologic changes abate over the 18–24h post­burn period. Due to the high fluid requirements needed, patients with large TBSA burns are at risk of compartment syndrome, pulmonary edema, and even cerebral edema in the setting of burn resuscitation. This phenomenon of excess
304
M. Hunter and D. T. Harrington
fluid resuscitation that was seen in many burn centers from 1990 to 2010 was called “Fluid Creep” [5]. In order to pre­vent this, many burn centers utilize “colloid rescue” in the first 24h to reduce volume of fluid. In addition to colloid use, protocols for burn resuscitation should have a feedback sys­tem that has providers turning down fluid rates as patients reach goal parameters [4]. Other factors that have been asso­ciated with fluid creep are the potential overuse of mechani­cal ventilation in the first 48 h after burn and overzealous use of narcotics. Both interventions should be thoughtfully used in the acute burn setting.
Pulmonary
The effect of severe burns on the pulmonary system can be from direct effect due to inhalation injury, from systemic injury from the systemic inflammatory response to injury or impairment of oxidative metabolism from cyanide and car­bon monoxide poisoning. Here, we will cover some topics specific to burn patients in the intensive care unit.
Airway Injury
Inhalation injury can cause significant concern for upper airway edema. Thermal injury will be absorbed in the upper airway, except in the case of steam which can reach further down the respiratory tract. Traditionally, patients with evi­dence of facial burns or soot around mouth and nares were considered at risk for inhalation injury. However, these signs have been shown to have a poor correlation with need for intubation. While the best assessment of upper airway injury is a nasolaryngoscopy for direct visualization [6], often providers must rely on patient history and clinical exam to determine the likelihood of upper airway injury and need for intubation.
14 ICU Care ofBurn Patients
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
305
Airspace Injury
Oxygenation can be compromised in severe burns due to direct injury from inhaled soot, mists, and fumes or indirect injury from systemic factors. Inhalation of chemicals or irri­tants in smoke can damage lungs leading to hypoxia and need for intubation. Inhalation injury is associated with an increased need for resuscitation as well as an increased risk of mortality. Diagnosis relies on clinical judgment and should be supported by evidence of inhalation injury on bronchoscopy. Treatment for lower airway inhalation injury is supportive. Patients will have significant sloughing of mucosa and forma­tion of fibrin casts requiring aggressive pulmonary toilet. For those requiring intubation, lung protective ventilation is rec­ommended, and bronchodilators may have some benefit [7].
In addition to direct injury, severely burned patients are at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from the significant systemic inflammatory response to their injury. This can occur in up to 30% of burn patients requiring intensive care [2]. This presents as increasing hypoxia occurring days after the injury with bilateral opacities on chest radiograph as defined by the Berlin Criteria. Treatment is supportive with lung protective mechanical ventilation aiming for target tidal volumes of 6mL/ kg of predicted body weight and plateau pressures of <30 cmH2O. For patients with severe ARDS, other strategies such as paralysis and proning can improve oxygenation. If all else fails, providers can consider extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [8]. Therapy for ARDS is also to look for and treat any potential underlying drivers of this inflammatory insult. Identifying and treating sepsis and expeditious removal of any residual eschar should also be performed [5].
Ventilation
Ventilation is an important consideration in the severely burned patient. Patients will be compensating for a metabolic acidosis from tissue hypoperfusion in the setting of shock. Patients with
306
M. Hunter and D. T. Harrington
large burns or circumferential burns to the torso may require escharotomies to allow for improved ventilation [2].
Toxins
Fire environments produce cyanide and carbon monoxide. Both these toxins poison the ability of the cell to use oxygen in oxidative metabolism. Direct measurement of the percent­age of hemoglobin bound with carbon monoxide is readily available by blood gas measurement or co-oximeter but mea­surement of cyanide levels often takes 24–36h in many cen­ters. Development of a metabolic acidosis or unexpected decrease in mental status should prompt a workup and treat­ment for these potentially life-threatening toxins.
Infection andSepsis
Skin is an important part of our defense against infection. Severe burn injury not only causes direct destruction of a bar­rier to infection but also a global depression of the immune system leading to an increased risk of infection [9]. Infections account for 51% of deaths in burn patients with pneumonia, cellulitis, urinary tract infection, and burn wound infection as the top sources [10]. However, in the setting of a systemic inflammatory response to injury, diagnosis can be difficult in the severely burned patient. For each type of infection, it is important to consider early source control and early empiric antibiotics with narrowing according to culture data as soon as possible. Below are some considerations for common infections in severely burned patients.
Prevention
The most important part of infection control in critically ill burn patients is prevention. First, treatment of burn wounds with early excision and skin grafting reduces the systemic
14 ICU Care ofBurn Patients
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
307
inflammatory effects as well as restoring a barrier against infection. While wounds are open, topical antimicrobials can combat bacterial growth [10].
Burn patients with greater than 20% TBSA burns should have a private room with an elevated ambient temperature to prevent hypothermia. In addition to strict hand hygiene, pro­viders and visitors should wear gowns, gloves, hats, and masks to reduce the risk of contamination. These measures have been shown to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection in the burn patient [11]. These precautions should be maintained until less than 20% TBSA burns are open.
To prevent catheter associated infections, it is important to assess the need for these catheters daily and remove central lines and Foley catheters as soon as they are no longer needed. Central lines through intact skin can be changed as per routine institutional protocols, but catheters through burn skin may need to be replaced every 3–5days [12].
Sepsis
Detecting sepsis in the severely burned patient requires pro­viders to pay close attention to the patient’s overall condition to see changes in hemodynamics, metabolism, and laboratory values. Providers cannot rely on absolute values alone to dif­ferentiate sepsis from the background of a systemic inflamma­tory response to injury which most all burn patients manifest. In 2007, the American Burn Association Consensus Conference found that the definition of sepsis used for non- burned patients did not describe sepsis in burn patients adequately. This con­sensus conference defined sepsis as “a change in the burn patient that triggers the concern for infection” [13]. Sepsis requires three or more of the following criteria:
• Temperature >39°C or <36.5°C
• Progressive tachycardia >110 beats/minute
• Progressive tachypnea >25 breaths per minute or minute
ventilation >12L/min
• Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mcL
308
M. Hunter and D. T. Harrington
• Hyperglycemia in the absence of pre-existing diabetes
mellitus
• Inability to continue enteral feeding >24h
AND
• Culture positive infection OR pathologic tissue source
identification OR clinical response to antimicrobials
Pneumonia
The diagnosis of pneumonia can be obscured with a presence of ARDS and/or inhalation injury. Scoring systems such as the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) can guide providers on screening ventilated patients for ventilator­associated pneumonia (VAP) [14]. For ventilated patients where pneumonia is suspected, providers can obtain culture data with bronchoalveolar-lavage (BAL) to help confirm the diagnosis and narrow antibiotic coverage.
Burn Wound Infections
Diagnosing a burn wound infection takes careful clinical judgment. Wounds will become colonized with bacteria within 24h of burn injury; therefore, the presence of bacteria does not equate with an infection. In order to diagnose a wound infection, a quantitative wound culture should be taken and show >105 bacteria/gram of tissue in the setting of infection or sepsis. Clinical suspicion can also be used. Cellulitis, early tinctorial change of the burn eschar, and premature separation of the burn eschar should raise a clini­cal suspicion for burn wound infection or sepsis. Treatment includes intravenous antibiotics and urgent debridement of infected tissue [13]. In some cases, due to use of broad spec­trum antibiotics and the immunocompromised state of major burns, patients can develop invasive fungal infections. Yeast infections can be treated with topical and systemic antifun-
14 ICU Care ofBurn Patients
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
309
gals as well as debridement. However, fungal infections carry a high mortality and need to be treated with radical debride­ment and possible amputation for source control [10].
Metabolism
The body’s metabolic response to a large burn is activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and creates a profound hyper­metabolic and catabolic state which approaches double the basal rate [9]. As a result, patients have an increased caloric need that can approach as high as 110–150% of non-burned patients [6]. This leads to breakdown of proteins and weight loss. Significant weight loss can lead to immune dysfunction and delayed wound healing [15].
Nutrition
The importance of adequate nutrition in burn patients cannot be overstated. The best measurement of a burn patient’s caloric need is through indirect calorimetry. However, if this is not available, caloric needs can be estimated using equa­tions such as the Harris Benedict equation to estimate basal energy expenditure and adjust for demands of burn injury by using a multiplier of 1.5 [15]. Enteral feeding should be initi­ated as early as is feasible and routinely within the first 24h. In large burn injury, diets and tube feedings should be high in protein and carbohydrates and low in fat [16]. Burn patients are at risk for swallowing dysfunction. Inhalation injury, long­term intubation, placement of a tracheostomy tube, long- term use of nasogastric tubes, and extensive burns to the neck are risk factors for swallowing dysfunction. Patients with any of these risk factors should have a comprehensive bedside swal­lowing evaluation. Aspiration detected on bedside evaluation should lead to a nothing by mouth status. If no aspiration is detected on bedside evaluation, then the patient should have a definitive test to rule-out aspiration such as a modified
310
M. Hunter and D. T. Harrington
barium swallow (MBS) or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). These definitive evaluations of swal­lowing are necessary because bedside evaluation alone has a false negative rate and subsequent silent aspiration of up to 25–30%.
Hyperglycemia
Due to the profound stress response in large burn injuries, many patients develop insulin resistance resulting in hyper­glycemia. This can lead to poor wound healing and loss of skin grafts. This insulin resistance can persist for months after a large burn injury. Blood glucose should be followed closely in all patients with large burns, even those without a history of diabetes. Subcutaneous insulin can be used to control blood glucose, and in severe cases continuous intravenous insulin can be used in the acute setting [16].
Renal
Patients with severe burn injuries are at risk for acute kidney injury at different phases of their course. About 30% of severely burned patients will develop acute kidney injury, and this is associated with an increased mortality [6]. Early kidney injury is related to burn shock or in some cases compartment syndrome or direct injury to muscles leading to rhabdomy­olysis. In both cases, a robust burn resuscitation is the best response to early kidney injury. Acute kidney injury that develops after the initial resuscitation is most often related to sepsis. Source control and treatment of infection are neces­sary to prevent ongoing injury.
14 ICU Care ofBurn Patients
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
311
Renal Replacement Therapy
Rarely, burn patients will progress to renal failure and require renal replacement therapy. However, progression to renal failure is a poor prognostic indicator and is associated with up to 80% mortality in the burn population. Intermittent hemo­dialysis can be used for patients with adequate blood pres­sure. However, more often burn patients in the ICU require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) due to hemo­dynamic instability [17].
Palliative Care
Palliative care is an important concept in the treatment of severely burned patients. Burn patients have significant pain and stress both from the injury and from the treatment in the intensive care unit. It is important to have good communica­tion with patients and their families about the prognosis and course of their treatment as well as understand the goals of each patient [17]. The use of palliative care teams have been used in some burn centers with positive effects.
Prognosis
While there are several models for determining mortality in burn patients, three factors are crucial in determining progno­sis: patient age, TBSA burned, and the presence of inhalation injury [18]. One of the most widely used is the Revised Baux Score [Age + Percent Burn + 17 × (Inhalation Injury, with 1=yes, 0=no)] which takes into account these factors [19]. In addition to mortality, burn providers should discuss the expectations of rehabilitation.