Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 949 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
7 Мб
Скачать
Chapter 4. Initial Management andResuscitation
125
undefined. The 2008 U.S.Joint Theater Trauma System guide­lines for burn resuscitation described a stepwise approach to the hypotensive burn patient, as follows:
1. Vasopressin
2. Volume infusion to achieve central venous pressure (CVP)
or pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) targets
3. Norepinephrine up to 20mcg/min
4. Epinephrine or phenylephrine. Meanwhile, these patients
should be evaluated for missed injury, adrenal insufciency,
hypocalcemia, or other issues [35]
Our practice has evolved since that publication. Vasopressors are used more routinely. CVP is rarely moni­tored in the critically ill burn patient. Pulmonary artery catheters are placed less frequently, and use of predeter­mined CVP or PAWP targets is unusual. On the other hand, it is important to understand that the cavalier up-titration of alpha agonists during burn shock is potentially hazard­ous. An increasing requirement for such agents should prompt a comprehensive reevaluation of volume status, cardiac function, end-organ perfusion, and acid–base status. The risk/benefit ratio of volume vs. vasopressor infusions must be assessed.
Maintaining situational awareness of all the data that need to be monitored during a complicated burn resuscitation is challenging and starts with effective documentation. The Joint Trauma System flowsheet is one paper-based format, developed for the battlefield, that can be used to record the basic data [35]. Furthermore, decision support tools such as Burn Navigator (Arcos Medical, Houston, TX) can be used to document and display these data in a manner which was developed specifically for burn resuscitation. This system also makes recommendations on fluid infusion rates based on analysis of trends in the UO [36].
During hours 24–48 postburn, we routinely infuse 5% albumin in normal saline in accordance with the modified Brooke formula. The dose for this infusion is weight based, according to a sliding scale:
126
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. C. Cancio and J. M. Cancio
• 0.3mL/kg/TBSA for burn size 30–49%
• 0.4mL/kg/TBSA for burn size 50–69%
• 0.5mL/kg/TBSA for burn size 70–100%
Thus, an 80kg patient with a 70% burn would receive (80 *70*0.5mL)/24h=2800mL/24h=117mL/h. This infusion is given over 24h and is normally not titrated. Meanwhile, the LR infusion used during the first 24 h is weaned to off. As described below, initiation of an albumin infusion before the 24th postburn hour is sometimes used to rescue patients who are failing resuscitation.
Typically, burn patients spontaneously diurese their resuscitation volume over days 3–10 postburn. Increasingly, we have recognized the value of active “de-resuscitation” to offload this volume more quickly [37]. Beneficial effects of this strategy may include earlier extubation and, in patients who require excision of the burn wound, more successful healing of skin grafts [38]. De-resuscitation can be performed either pharmacologically using diuretics or by means of con­tinuous renal replacement therapy.
Complicated Resuscitation
Not all patients respond to resuscitation successfully; historically, about 12% of burn patients who died, did so during the first 48 h despite full resuscitative efforts [39]. Indications of resuscitation failure, in patients who have already received a substantial volume of fluids, include the following:
• Progressive metabolic acidosis
• Acute kidney injury
• Refractory oliguria or anuria
• Escalating vasoactive pressor doses
In this setting, it is tempting to respond with a further escalation in crystalloid resuscitation volume. This may be reasonable at first, but as the cumulative infusion volume nears 250mL/kg during the first 24h (the “Ivy Index”), the
Chapter 4. Initial Management andResuscitation
127
risk of abdominal and other compartment syndromes mounts [31]. In our experience, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in burn patients is associated with a mortality risk of nearly 100% if it requires decompressive laparotomy [40]. The group at UC Davis reported a 40% survival rate after decompressive laparotomy for ACS, but many of those patients were children who developed ACS in the setting of sepsis rather than burn shock [41]. Although a decompressive laparotomy may temporize ACS, it is often impossible to achieve timely abdominal closure, there is loss of domain, and the physiologic insult of an open abdomen compounds that of an extensive burn.
Thus, we aim to keep the resuscitation volume below 250mL/kg/24 h. This requires ongoing awareness of the cur­rent infusion rate, the cumulative volume, and the projected 24-h volume. As a rule of thumb, an hourly infusion of 2000mL or more is cause for concern, as is a sustained infu­sion rate of 1500mL/h or more for several hours. By about 8–10 h postburn, it should be possible to extrapolate: the cumulative volume to the 24-h point, and to begin to make an assessment of the risk of exceeding 250mL/kg/24h (Fig.4.3). Interventions to salvage patients who are headed toward resuscitation failure include:
• Reassess volume and cardiac status via enhanced
monitoring (see above)
• Look for a missed injury, such as non-thermal trauma
• Measure bladder pressure; assess for ACS
• Initiate early albumin
• Initiate continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or
therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE)
• Initiate high-dose ascorbic acid therapy
Measurement of bladder pressure should be done routinely in patients whose predicted or actual infused volume exceeds 250 mL/kg. WSACS—the World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome—defines ACS as a bladder pressure of 20 mmHg with new onset organ failure [42]. In burn patients, others have recommended decompressive laparot-
128
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. C. Cancio and J. M. Cancio
F . Screen shot from the Burn Navigator burn resuscitation decision support system. This graph shows the cumulative fluid vol­ume. Extrapolation of the cumulative fluid volume curve to the 24th postburn hour allows an estimation of the risk of exceeding the Ivy index of 250 mL/kg by that hour. Reproduced with permission of Arcos Medical, Inc., Houston, TX
omy at a bladder pressure of 30mmHg and signs of physio­logic compromise [41]. Thus, a bladder pressure of 20–30mmHg could be defined as a “warning zone.” Short of decompressive laparotomy, burn patients with ACS may ben­efit from several interventions to include abdominal escha­rotomy, neuromuscular blockade, and paracentesis [43]. Placement of a diagnostic peritoneal lavage catheter into the abdomen may allow ongoing drainage to occur as resuscita­tion proceeds.
We routinely infuse 5% albumin in normal saline during hours 24–48 postburn, in accordance with the modified Brooke formula (see above). In light of evidence suggesting that microvascular permeability, at least in unburned tissues, begins to resolve around hours 8–12 postburn [11], we insti-
Chapter 4. Initial Management andResuscitation
tute albumin before the 24th postburn hour in patients whose trajectory indicates that they are headed toward exceeding the Ivy Index. We have observed that it is possible to decrease the fluid infusion rate within about 3h in many patients who receive early albumin [18].
At the US Army Burn Center, CRRT for the treatment of burn patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) was associated with decreased 28-day and hospital mortality, in comparison with matched case controls [44]. Although that study did not examine the use of CRRT during burn shock, we now routinely provide CRRT to patients during burn shock resuscitation who develop AKI, to include hyperkale­mia or metabolic acidosis refractory to medical management. CRRT also facilitates the off-loading of edema fluid during de-resuscitation. Another extracorporeal rescue strategy is TPE [45].
Finally, high-dose IV ascorbic acid (vitamin C) was studied by Tanaka and colleagues in Tokyo. In their randomized con­trolled single-center trial, patients were considered for enroll­ment if they were admitted within 2h of injury. Vitamin C at a dose of 66 mg/kg/h was started as soon as possible after admission and was continued for the first 24h postburn. It was associated with a decrease in resuscitation fluid require­ments, weight gain, wound edema, serum malondialdehyde levels, and ventilator days [46]. Since the proposed mecha­nism of action of vitamin C in burn shock is its anti-oxidant properties, it makes sense to begin it as soon as possible after admission, rather than as a later rescue therapy.
129
Management of theBurned Extremity
One of the most challenging aspects of early burn care is the management of the burned extremity. Extremities with deep circumferential burns are at risk of ischemic injury via a pro­cess we term “extremity eschar syndrome.” Whereas normal skin is elastic, full-thickness burns are inelastic. Furthermore, edema beneath the inelastic burn wound progressively
130
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. C. Cancio and J. M. Cancio
squeezes the extremity, acting like a tourniquet, and impeding venous outflow, capillary blood flow, and ultimately arterial inflow. To decrease edema formation, burned extremities (especially upper extremities) should be elevated by any available means at a level above the heart throughout resus­citation; see below for more information on the role of the rehabilitation team in positioning.
Doppler flowmetry of circumferentially burned extremities is performed hourly during resuscitation. The arteries to be monitored are the radial and ulnar arteries at the wrist; the superficial palmar arch of the hand; and the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries at the ankle/foot. Loss or pro­gressive diminution in the audible Doppler signal is an indi­cation for escharotomy.
Escharotomy is an incision through the full thickness of the burn eschar and into the underlying subcutaneous tissue. Escharotomies of the extremities are performed along the mid-medial and/or mid-lateral joint lines (Fig.4.2). Structures to avoid include the ulnar nerve at the elbow (place the inci­sion anterior to the medial epicondyle) and the superficial radial nerve at the wrist (which becomes subcutaneous about 9 cm proximal to the radial styloid) [47]. Successful escha­rotomy results in restoration of the distal Doppler signal. Doppler flow must be rechecked after the procedure, and hourly thereafter till resuscitation is complete.
The deeply burned hand is a problem of great concern. The following procedures should be performed by qualified surgeons. In a patient with deep dorsal hand burns, loss of the palmar arch Doppler signal despite the presence of radial and ulnar flow is an indication for dorsal hand escha­rotomies via incisions over the second and fourth metacar­pals, with care not to injure the extensor tendons. In addition, some authors recommend that interosseous (intrinsic) muscle fasciotomies should routinely accompany dorsal hand escharotomies [48, 49], although this has not been our usual practice.
Patients with deeply burned but still viable fingers who lose Doppler signal in the digital arteries may benefit from
Chapter 4. Initial Management andResuscitation
131
digital escharotomies. This is a matter of ongoing controversy in the burn literature with some advocating for digital escha­rotomies [49, 50], and some questioning the benefit [51]. There are limited studies, with one small prospective trial showing an improvement in the number of necrotic phalan­ges with digital escharotomies [52]. The incision for a digital escharotomy is performed along one side of the involved finger, between the neurovascular bundle (which lies at the level of the digital flexion crease) and the extensor tendon apparatus. This procedure can be bloody, and pinpoint elec­trocautery will likely be needed.
The advent of Nexobrid (MediWound Ltd, Industrial Zone Yavne, Israel), a rapidly acting, enzymatic debriding agent, may facilitate the prevention and treatment of extrem­ity eschar syndromes, especially of the hands. At present, NexoBrid is recommended for use by trained specialists [53]. FDA approval for marketing in the US has been obtained.
The extremity eschar syndrome should not be confused with a true intramuscular compartment syndrome. In the for­mer situation, the problem is edema beneath the burn eschar, and the remedy is an incision through the skin. In the latter situation, the problem is edema (or bleeding) beneath the investing fascia, and the treatment is a fasciotomy. To be sure, compartment syndrome does occur in burn patients, for example:
• With massive resuscitation, in either burned or unburned
extremities
• Following delayed escharotomy, via an ischemia-
reperfusion mechanism
• In the setting of concomitant mechanical trauma (e.g.,
crush, fracture, vascular ischemia-reperfusion)
• With burns that extend into the muscle
• Following high-voltage electrical injury
Thus, even patients who undergo apparently successful escharotomies must continue to receive monitoring of the Doppler signal and of the physical examination throughout
132
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. C. Cancio and J. M. Cancio
the resuscitation period. In patients diagnosed with compartment syndrome, operative fasciotomy is required.
Wound Care andPain Management
During first aid at the scene, immediate cooling of a burn wound with cool running water appears to be beneficial if it can be performed without causing hypothermia or delaying lifesaving interventions [54]. Any toxic chemicals must be rapidly decontaminated. Wound debridement is not an early priority in the management of a critically ill burn patient, but it should be completed during the first 24h postburn. At the US Army Burn Center and many other centers, a special room is dedicated to showering burn patients while they are recumbent on a shower cart. In other settings, it may be advantageous to use the operating room for initial debride­ment. Burn wound debridement is often an aggressive pro­cess intended to remove all sloughed epidermis, debris, dirt, and other material. An antiseptic such as chlorhexidine glu­conate is used. Once debridement has been completed, a topical antimicrobial or other burn dressing is applied as described in the Burn Wound Management chapter.
Adequate debridement requires adequate analgesia. Conscious sedation may be helpful, but general anesthesia is rarely needed. Analgesia may consist of intermittent IV boluses or a continuous rate infusion of narcotics and/or ket­amine. Intravenous sedatives with a sympatholytic effect such as propofol may be poorly tolerated during burn shock. Intermittent low-dose lorazepam or an infusion of midazolam may be better tolerated during this phase of care.
Supportive Care
Because of increased blood flow to the injured surface of the body, impaired thermoregulation, and loss of the cutaneous barrier to evaporative water loss, burn patients are at high
Chapter 4. Initial Management andResuscitation
risk of hypothermia. During debridement and indeed throughout the resuscitation period, prevention of hypother­mia is essential, and the primary method for accomplishing this is a warm environment.
Patients with burn size of 20% or greater, and those who are mechanically ventilated, require prophylaxis against stress gastroduodenal ulceration (Curling’s ulcer). We use a proton-pump inhibitor for this purpose. We provide deep­venous- thrombosis prophylaxis with subcutaneous low­molecular weight or unfractionated heparin.
We aim to provide enteral nutrition within 24h of injury, via a nasogastric or nasoduodenal tube [55]. Reasons for delay during the burn shock period may include a high vaso­pressor dose (e.g., norepinephrine >10 mcg/min) or lactic acidosis (e.g., lactate >3mmol/L).
Care of the eyes during burn resuscitation includes evaluation upon admission for corneal injury and measurement of intraocular pressures. If undiagnosed and untreated, corneal injuries in burn patients may become infected, ulcerate, and perforate, leading to blindness. Like abdominal and extremity compartment syndromes, orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is more likely in patients who receive >250mL/kg dur­ing the first 24h postburn. However, it can also occur in patients with facial burns who receive no fluid resuscitation at all [56]. OCS, another vision-threatening complication, is easily treated with lateral canthotomy and cantholysis. This speaks to the value of early and ongoing evaluation of patients with extensive burns and those with facial burns by an ophthalmologist.
133
Role oftheRehabilitation Team
Rehabilitation was traditionally viewed as a separate “phase” in the care of injured patients, but today we recognize the long-term functional impact of interventions made by thera­pists during the immediate postburn hours. Accordingly, assessment by the rehabilitation team (occupational and/or physical therapists) should take place on the day of admis-
134
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. C. Cancio and J. M. Cancio
sion. A comprehensive burn evaluation should include the following elements [57, 58]:
• History of how injury occurred
• Patient’s preinjury functional and activity level
• Location and depth of burn injury, to include TBSA burn
and calculation of cutaneous functional units (CFUs)
• Associated injuries such as fractures, inhalation injury,
exposed tendon/bone
• Edema, range of motion, strength, sensation measurements
• Activities of daily living assessment
• Functional mobility status
• Positioning needs
• Short-term and long-term goals
• Treatment plan
Since the hands are involved in more than 80% of patients with severe burns [59], monitoring hand edema is of signifi­cant importance during initial resuscitation. Use of a figure­of- eight hand edema measurement technique has been shown to be reliable and valid in the burn population [60]. This is a practical technique that can be performed rapidly and can be used to examine the efficacy of initial edema man­agement techniques during resuscitation.
Positioning programs should be initiated immediately upon admission, as edema generally peaks within 12–48 h postburn [61]. The focus should be on reduction of edema, minimizing the risk of peripheral neuropathy, and promoting joint alignment [57]. This is especially prudent in burns of extremities that are deep-partial to full-thickness in depth, as well as in burns involving over 20% TBSA. In larger burns, edema formation is more severe and lasts longer, due to increased capillary permeability and the massive fluid vol­umes required for resuscitation [62].
Positioning programs should be individualized, closely monitored, and adjusted depending on the patient’s medical status [57]. Generally speaking, elevation of the extremities includes placement of the involved hand or foot above the