Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 881 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
9 Мб
Скачать
412
Fig. 29.1 Small bowel
obstruction from adhesions
G. Perrone et al.
multifactorial nature of adhesion pathogenesis. Extensive literature on the subject demonstrates both the complexity of the issue and the myriad resources allocated to this condition, yet few interdisciplinary studies have been conducted involving experts from different elds. Currently the medical community only recognizes the “tip of the iceberg” and will continue treating the condition inadequately until it is more comprehensively explored [4]. In the case of suspected strangulation or after failed conservative management, open surgery is the preferred method for the surgi­cal treatment of adhesive SBO, but laparoscopy (Fig.29.2) is gaining widespread acceptance especially in a selected group of patients. “Good” surgical technique and anti-adhesive barriers are the main current concepts of adhesion prevention. The World Society of Emergency Surgery 2013 guidelines stated that in the absence of signs of strangulation or peritonitis, NOM can be prolonged up to 72h. After 72h of NOM without resolution, surgery is recommended. The risk of adhesions is greater in patients of less than 40years of age undergoing abdominal surgery. The increase in life expectancy has resulted in an increase of the “old youngs who underwent multiple surgeries” that in life have had several occlusive episodes. A Van Goor’s study underlines that patient age and three or more previous laparotomies appeared to be independent parameters predicting inadvertent enterotomy. Patients with inad­vertent enterotomy had signicantly more postoperative complications and urgent re-laparotomies, a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit and parenteral nutrition usage, and a longer postoperative hospital stay [5].
In an unselected patient series of intestinal obstruction, a history of previous gynecologic pathology is a signicant factor contributing to the total number of instances of intestinal obstruction in females. Surgical peritoneal closure may also result in an increase in the incidence of intestinal obstruction [6].
There are no guidelines for surgical management of malignant BO caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis, mainly when it involves the elderly; so, its treatment is still debated. In outlining indications and benets of palliative surgery for
29 Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 29.2 Laparoscopic lysis
of small bowel adhesions
413
obstructive carcinomatosis and in determining what prognostic factors, including age, have independent and signicant association with outcome, surgical palliation can provide relief of obstructive symptoms as well as improved survival in well­selected patients, even if elderly.
Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, small bowel tumors are notoriously difcult to diagnose and are often advanced at the time of denitive treatment. Small intestinal neoplasms are uncommon cancers. They may occur sporadically, in association with genetic diseases (e.g., familial adenomatous polyposis coli or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome) or in association with chronic intestinal inammatory dis­orders (e.g., Crohn’s disease or celiac sprue). Benign small intestinal tumors (e.g., leiomyoma, lipoma, hamartoma, or desmoid tumor) usually are asymptomatic but may present with complications. Primary malignancies of the small intestine, including adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, carcinoid, and lymphoma, are often symptomatic and may present with intestinal obstruction [7].
Since the small intestine is relatively inaccessible to routine endoscopy, diagno­sis of small intestinal neoplasms is often delayed for months after the onset of symptoms. Recently the increase of small bowel endoscopy and other diagnostic tools allows earlier nonoperative diagnosis. Even though radical resection of small bowel cancer plays an important role, 5-year overall survival remains low [
8].
SBO in an oncology patient is a common and serious medical problem which is associated with diagnostic as well as therapeutic dilemmas. While the condition is most commonly caused by postoperative adhesions and peritoneal carcinomatosis, other causes have been reported—linitis plastica caused by metastatic lobular carci­noma of the breast, patterns of malignant melanoma’s metastasis to the small bowel, intussusception in a patient treated for osteosarcoma with history of multiple metas­tases, a case of jejunal intussusception with gastrointestinal bleeding caused by metastatic testicular germ cell cancer.
While adhesions are the most common cause of SBO, hernias remain the most frequent cause of strangulation in patients presenting with this condition [9]. In the physical examination of an elderly patient with SBO, care should be taken to
414
G. Perrone et al.
examine the hernial sites; an irreducible mass or tenderness calls for immediate operation. Obstruction by widespread intraperitoneal malignancy is the result of xation and puckering of the bowel, often in several places. After the bowel has been decompressed, there is usually no call for any surgical procedure other than lateral anastomosis to relieve the obstruction. Abdominal hernias may be classied as groin hernias (femoral and inguinal) and ventral hernias (umbilical, epigastric, spigelian, and incisional). Strangulated hernias remain a signicant challenge, as they are sometimes difcult to diagnose purely by physical examination yet require urgent surgical intervention. Early surgical intervention of a strangulated hernia with obstruction is crucial as delayed diagnosis can lead to bowel resection with longer recovery and its attendant complications. Strangulated hernias can have seri­ous deleterious effects such as bowel obstruction, bacterial translocation, and intes­tinal wall necrosis (potentially resulting in bowel perforation). It poses a signicant risk to emergency hernia repair, as there is an increased incidence of surgical eld contamination, leading to high rates of postoperative infection and probably recur­rence. Patients should undergo emergency hernia repair immediately when intesti­nal strangulation is suspected (grade 1C recommendation). Unfortunately, morbidity and mortality rates remain high for patients who undergo emergency repair of abdominal hernias. Early diagnosis of strangulated obstruction maybe difcult, and delayed diagnosis can lead to septic complications. However, in the case of sus­pected bowel strangulation, the benets outweigh the risks of surgery, and patients should undergo immediate surgical intervention [10].
Lumbar hernias are rare conditions, and about 300 cases have been reported since the rst description by Barbette in 1672. Therefore, strangulation or incarceration is also exceptionally encountered. Lumbar hernia is seen mostly in association with other abdominal wall hernias in elderly patients. They can also be bilateral as seen in this case. It was reported that the coexistence of lumbar hernia and other abdominal wall hernia is observed in 13% of patients. These reports suggest that a patient pre­senting with a lumbar hernia should be explored for the presence of a coexisting hernia, such as inguinal, femoral, or obturator hernia. In our case, except for the contralateral lumbar hernia, no other type of abdominal wall hernia was seen [11].
Obturator hernia was rst described by Ronsil in 1724 [12]. The incidence is nearly 1% of all hernias [13]. With the nickname “little old lady’s hernia,” it usually occurs in multiparous and elderly emaciated women due to a wider pelvis and enlarged obturator canal. The other risk factors include chronic obstructive pulmo­nary disease, chronic constipation, and ascites. The cardinal clinical symptom is acute intestinal obstruction. The patient can have a positive Howship-Romberg sign, which is caused by the intermittent irritation of the obturator nerve. It was reported that 15–50% patients of obturator hernia may have positive Howship-Romberg. To examine the thigh, adductor reex might be valuable for differentiating osteoarthri­tis from obturator hernia. The loss of the adductor reex, named as the Hannington­Kiff sign, sometimes is observed on the affected side, while the patellar tendon reex was intact on the same side [14].
Paraduodenal hernia is an unusual form of internal hernia that results from a con­genital midgut malrotation. It is classied as either right or left, depending on
29 Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
415
anatomic features and embryologic origin. Left hernias are three times more common than right. Clinical symptoms may be intermittent and nonspecic, such as nausea, distention and abdominal pain, or sometimes acute SBO or ischemia. The average age at diagnosis is usually 38years. The paraduodenal hernia is an uncommon disorder characterized by extremely variable clinical manifestations, from absolute asymptom­atic to occlusion with ischemia or intestinal infarction. The importance of putting in the differential diagnosis of this disease in the case of occlusive pictures without an obvious cause is not to be underestimated. The instrumental images, and in particular the TACs, show quite a characteristic picture and are difcult to interpret by the radi­ologist or the experienced surgeon when not aware of this pathological condition. In a review of the literature, we found the disease in only six elderly patients (73–95years), most of them carrying a left paraduodenal hernia. This is indicative of the rarity of the disease and thus the likelihood of a correct diagnosis [15].
Nutritional status is very important, especially in older adults because of its effects on quality of life. Phytobezoar, for instance, that can lead to SBO has risk factors such as excessive consumption of foods with high-ber content and inade­quate chewing. These factors are related to dietary habits. Furthermore, the aging process and some related physiologic changes can predispose older adults to phyto­bezoar formation [16].
Internal abdominal hernias present an infrequent surgical diagnosis and are usu­ally encountered accidentally during surgery. They are generally considered as an extremely rare cause of ileus.
The incidence of the diverticulum of the SB varies from 0.2 to 1.3% in autopsy studies to 2.3% when assessed on enteroclysis. It occurs mostly in patients in the sixth decade of their life. Of all small bowel diverticula, jejunal diverticulum is the most common type. This rare entity is usually asymptomatic. However, they may cause chronic nonspecic symptoms for a long period of time like dyspepsia, chronic postprandial pain, nausea, vomiting, borborygmi, alternating diarrhea and constipation, weight loss, anemia, and steatorrhea or rarely lead to complications like hemorrhage, obstruction, and perforation. Obstruction can be due to enterolith, adhesions, intussusception, and volvulus. The condition is difcult to diagnose because patients generally present with symptoms that mimic other diseases. Only 27 cases of SBO by enterolith expelled from small bowel diverticula have been reported in the literature. Jejunal diverticular disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of mechanical small bowel obstruction without an obvious cause, especially in the elderly population.
The prevalence of inammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases in the elderly population. There is no increased risk for developing intestinal cancer among patients with elderly onset IBD in this population-based cohort. There are increased risks of developing lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders in all IBD.Thiopurine exposure was not found as associated with an increased risk to lymphoproliferative disorders. These data reinforce the difference between elderly onset IBD as compared with patients with a younger age at IBD onset [
17].
Among elderly patients, the incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is higher than that of Crohn’s disease (CD). Elderly patients with a new diagnosis of UC are more
416
G. Perrone et al.
likely to be male and have left-sided colitis. Elderly patients with a new diagnosis of CD are more likely to be female and have colonic disease. Conversely, increasing age at diagnosis has been associated with a lower likelihood of having any family history of IBD, perianal disease in CD, and extraintestinal manifestations. This increase in inammatory diseases in the elderly has meant that it is increasingly common to nd older people with bowel obstruction from Crohn’s disease [18].
The large bowel obstructions (LBO) are caused by carcinomas of the colon which slowly progress to give complete obstruction, inammatory disease, fecal impaction, sigmoid volvulus, and cecal volvulus. Malignancy accounts for 80% of LBO. Acute obstruction of the colon rectum is a more serious emergency than occlusion of SBO because of the risk of cecal distention, necrosis, and perforation. The onset of peritonitis due to cecal perforation in the elderly patient is insidious, and the seriousness of the situation may not be apparent until the patient goes into shock. Among patients with malignant large bowel tumors, obstruction in the left colon is more common than in the right colon.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major source of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population, and surgery is often the only denitive management option. Emergency surgery for acute colonic obstruction is associated with a signicant risk of mortality and morbidity and with a high percentage of stoma creation (either temporary or permanent). Right-sided colonic obstructions are usually treated by one-stage resection with primary anastomosis for all but the frailest patients, whereas controversy continues to revolve around emergency management of obstructed left colon cancer (OLCC). The WSES’s consensus conference of 2010 aimed to analyze the available scientic evidence on treatment modalities for OLCC and how this is implemented in clinical practice. The goal of the authors was to offer practical and scientically supported suggestions to manage OLCC.The committee made every effort to collect and classify the best available scientic evidence on treatment of OLCC [19].
Age itself is not a risk factor for the development of complications in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Age alone should not be a reason to avoid therapeutic or palliative surgery in these patients; instead patient selection should focus on clinical condition and ASA levels.
One-stage surgery appears to be superior to two- or three-stage procedures. Stenting is a promising option, allowing the resection to be carried out in an elective setting. Stenting appears to be a safe and effective addition to the armamentarium of treatment options for colorectal obstructions [20].
Volvulus of the intestine is a surgical emergency. Volvulus of the small bowel is more common in children and is most often secondary to malrotation. Colonic vol­vulus is a rare cause of large bowel obstruction but more common than small bowel volvulus in the elderly. Cecal volvulus (Fig.29.3) is most commonly due to lack of xation. Colonic volvulus has a specic radiographic appearance; however, small bowel volvulus is difcult to distinguish from other causes of small bowel obstruc­tion by radiographic means. New surgical techniques with minimally invasive sur­gery are increasingly being applied to this old problem with good results in selected cases. The incidence of small bowel volvulus in adults varies widely with
29 Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 29.3 Cecum volvulus
417
geographic location. In the Western world, it is rare and accounts for 1.7–6.2% of all SBO.Obstructions can be viewed as either primary (in a normal abdominal cav­ity) or, more commonly, secondary (due to anatomic malformations, malrotation, adhesions, tumors, or diverticula). Presentation is that of an acute small bowel obstruction, with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Peritoneal signs, palpable mass, fever, and leukocytosis are indicators of gangrenous bowel. Plain abdominal radiographs usually show a nonspecic pattern of SBO.Treatment is laparotomy with either detorsion or resection if the bowel involved is compromised, with cor­rection of the underlying cause as appropriate. Volvulus of the colon accounts for 10–13% of all large bowel obstruction in the United States. It can involve any seg­ment but most frequently occurs in the sigmoid or cecum. Volvulus of the sigmoid colon is the most common large bowel volvulus; it occurs in 70–80% of cases. It is usually secondary to a redundant colon, which may be associated with several ill­nesses. It is more common in the elderly, institutionalized patient. Typical radio­graphic ndings are the “bent inner tube” with the point usually directed to the right upper quadrant. The preferred approach in the stable patient who can undergo a bowel preparation would be elective sigmoid resection. Other options range from cecostomy, transverse colostomy, sigmoid colostomy, operative detorsion, and emergent resection [Hartmann procedure, obstructive resection (Paul-Mikulicz), primary anastomosis] to elective resection with primary anastomosis. Other less frequently used options would include tube sigmoidostomy, mesocoloplasty, sig­moidopexy to the transverse colon, sigmoidopexy to the parietes, and xations of the sigmoid mesentery. In patients with peritoneal signs where compromised bowel is suspected, denitive treatment with laparotomy and bowel resection is indicated. Ten to twenty percent of colonic volvulus is cecal volvulus. It is associated with lack of xation of the right colon to the peritoneum and is more prevalent in a younger patient population. It manifests in two main forms: axial rotation of the cecum and
418
G. Perrone et al.
the ileum around the mesentery (true volvulus) and the less common cecal bascule, where the bowel folds up on itself. Radiographic ndings are those of large bowel obstruction with a “coffee bean” deformity directed toward the left upper quadrant. Patients with cecal volvulus are more likely to need initial surgical treatment, with cecopexy, cecostomy, or resection. Detorsion alone is not recommended due to the high recurrence rate. Volvulus of the transverse colon is rare (2–4%), and splenic exure volvulus is the least common site. Diagnosis is usually intraoperative, and resection is the preferred treatment. A minimally invasive approach is feasible both in the acute and especially the elective settings but depends on the surgeon’s experi­ence [21].
The incidence of diverticulitis increases with age. Although left-sided colonic diverticulosis is more common among elderly patients, the most common acute mode of presentation is intestinal obstruction due to an exacerbation of the peridi­verticular inammation or to the adhesion of a loop of small bowel to the inamed colon. The obstruction may be complete and require a defunctioning proximal colostomy for its relief. The decision regarding surgical treatment must be based on the severity of the underling diverticulitis, the degree of intestinal obstruction, and also the claried presence of malignant colorectal disease [22].
The fecal impactions (“fecaloma”) are dehydrated fecal masses that form in the bulb rectal, especially in bedridden elderly patients, who, sometimes, for reasons of central vascular disease and/or dementia, have no cognizance of reection of defe­cation. So, the incomplete evacuation of stool may lead to the formation of a large mass of hard and unmovable stool in the rectum, in fact, “fecal impaction.” The rectosigma becomes distended, and the hard irregular mass (stercoroma) is not suf­ciently plastic to be expelled through the disproportionately small anal canal by the patient, who tries a generally weak defecation. The RX direct abdomen is an examination which is usually performed to assess whether there are “air-uid lev­els” or worse “free air in the abdomen,” radiological signs of acute surgical abdo­men, or more simply “signs of fecal impaction,” e.g., U-bends, vision of feces in the rectal ampoule, etc., or even bowel obstruction.
The frequency of fecal impaction is higher in geriatric patients admitted and treated in psychiatric hospitals. Patients who are immobilized for a long period (e.g., those with myocardial infarction or orthopedic problems) tend to develop a fecal impaction if not administered with mild laxatives for constipation. A careful rectal examination is not harmful in these patients and should be done routinely for early detection of impaction or occult intestinal bleeding.
Interesting complications but with rare conditions that accompany fecal packing are hernia, volvulus applicant megacolon, ileus, adynamic and leveling with gaseous distention, rectal prolapse, dystocia, and intestinal obstruction [23]. A fecaloma in the small intestine is extremely rare. However, this should be considered in differential diagnosis when symptoms of acute mechanical SBO develop in a child with constipa­tion. Diagnosis is usually made from radiographic ndings of a mobile intraluminal mass with a smooth outline and no mucosal attachment. Most fecalomas are success­fully treated by conservative methods such as laxatives, enemas, and rectal evacua­tion. When conservative treatments have failed, a surgical intervention may be needed.
29 Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
419
Laparoscopic techniques are gradually replacing many common surgical proce­dures that are performed in an increasingly aging population. Laparoscopy places different physiologic demands on the body to open surgery. PubMed was searched for evidence related to the use of laparoscopy in the elderly population to treat com­mon surgical pathologies. Randomized trials, systematic reviews, and meta- analyses were preferred. Currently, over 40% of all surgeries performed in the United States are on patients older than 65years. By the end of the twenty-rst century, Americans are expected to live 20years longer than the current average. However, elderly patients clearly show higher rates of surgical morbidity and mortality overall. Laparoscopic techniques show decreased wound complications, postoperative ileum, intraoperative blood loss, and reduced need for postoperative rehabilitation. In conclusion, laparoscopic surgery is safe in the elderly population and affords multiple advantages including decreased pain and convalescence. However, the physiology of laparoscopy places demands on elderly patients that typically present with more medical comorbidities. Elderly patients represent a large cohort of surgi­cal patients and are therefore profoundly affected by this shift in care. Where fea­sible, laparoscopic surgery is becoming the gold standard in the treatment of many common pathologies that disproportionately affect elderly patients. The benets of laparoscopy have been well documented, including decreased postoperative pain, decreased length of hospital stay, improved cosmesis, and a quicker return to nor­mal activity. On the contrary, laparoscopy may be more technically challenging, owing to a signicant learning curve among surgeons, and carries with it a distinct milieu of physiologic demands on the elderly patient. The surgical requirements for laparoscopic surgery place unique physiological demands on the patient and present a distinct challenge in the elderly patient. The insufation of carbon dioxide gas can create acid-base disturbances, changes in blood gas balance, and alterations of car­diovascular and pulmonary physiology. While most of these changes do not result in clinical signicance, they can become more of a factor in patients with comorbid­ity conditions, especially those that result in decreased cardiopulmonary reserve, as is common in elderly patients [
24].
Utilization of abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) in geriatric patients pre­senting to the emergency department (ED) with acute abdominal symptoms strongly inuences clinical management and signicantly affects disposition. As the US popu­lation ages, the clinical impact of emergent CT in the elderly will intensify [25].
Intussusception is dened as a segment of the gastrointestinal tract and mesen­tery within the lumen of an adjacent segment. It is a rare condition that in adults can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract from the stomach to the rectum. Only 5% of all intussusceptions are presented in adults and in 1–5% of all cases of intes­tinal obstruction.
Conclusions
Most operations on elderly subjects are performed to correct or avert serious
lesions. Once a decision is made that surgical treatment is indicated, the advanced
age of the patient is a good reason for operating without delay. The improved
outlook in recent years can be attributed to a more hopeful attitude on the part of
420
G. Perrone et al.
the surgeon, better anesthesia, and an increase in our knowledge. It is in the care
of the sick, elderly, surgical patient that the value of a medical team drawn from
several specialties is most evident.
References
1. Kizer KW, Vassar MJ.Emergency department diagnosis of abdominal disorders in the elderly.
Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:357–62.
2. Telfer S, Fenyo G, Holt PR, etal. Acute abdominal pain in patients over 50 years of age. Scand
J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1998;144:47–50.
3. Hendrickson MH, Naparst TR.Abdominal surgical emergencies in the elderly. Emerg Med
Clin North Am. 2003;21:937–69.
4. Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Manfredi R, Campanati L, Poiasina E, Bertoli P, Capponi MG,
Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Cucchi M, Lazzareschi D, Pisano M, Catena F.Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the “ignored iceberg” of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8:6.
5. Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van
Goor H.Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy. Br J Surg. 2000;87:467–71.
6. Stricker B, Blanco J, Fox HE. The gynecologic contribution to intestinal obstruction in
females. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:617–20.
7. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, Gagliardi S, Di Saverio S, De Cataldis A, Taffurelli M.Small
bowel tumours in emergency surgery: specicity of clinical presentation. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:997–9.
8. Coco C, Rizzo G, Manno A, Mattana C, Verbo A. Surgical treatment of small bowel neo-
plasms. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:327–33.
9. Ihedioha U, Alani A, Modak P, Chong P, O’Dwyer PJ.Hernias are the most common cause of
strangulation in patients presenting with small bowel obstruction. Hernia. 2006;10:338–40.
10. Sartelli M, Coccolini F, van Ramshorst GH, Campanelli G, Mandalà V, Ansaloni L, Moore EE,
Peitzman A, Velmahos G, Moore FA, Leppaniemi A, Burlew CC, Bif W, Koike K, Kluger Y, Fraga GP, Ordonez CA, Di Saverio S, Agresta F, Sakakushev B, Gerych I, Wani I, Kelly MD, Gomes CA, Faro MP Jr, Taviloglu K, Demetrashvili Z, Lee JG, Vettoretto N, Guercioni G, Tranà C, Cui Y, Kok KYY, Ghnnam WM, Abbas AE-S, Sato N, Marwah S, Rangarajan M, Ben-Ishay O, Adesunkanmi ARK, Lohse HAS, Kenig J, Mandalà S, Patrizi A, Scibé R, Catena F.WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8:50.
11. Fokou M, Fotso P, Ngowe MN, Essomba A, Sosso M.Strangulated or incarcerated spontane-
ous lumbar hernia as exceptional cause of intestinal obstruction: case report and review of the literature. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:44.
12. Ziegler DW, Rhoads JE Jr. Obturator hernia needs a laparotomy, not a diagnosis. Am J Surg.
1995;170:67–8.
13. Lo CY, Lorentz TG, Lau PW.Obturator hernia presenting as small bowel obstruction. Am J
Surg. 1994;167:396–8.
14. Hannington-Kiff JG.Absent thigh adductor reex in obturator hernia. Lancet. 1980;1:180.
15. Andreani S, Cimbanassi S, Pugliese R, Chiara O.An unusual cause of small bowel obstruction
in the elderly. Ann Ital Chir. 2006;77:513–6.
16. Akrami M, Sasani MR.Dietary habits affect quality of life: bowel obstruction caused by phy-
tobezoar. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45:1080–2.
29 Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
421
17. Cheddani H, Dauchet L, Fumery M, Charpentier C, Marie Bouvier A, Dupas JL, Pariente B,
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Savoye G, Gower-Rousseau C.Cancer in elderly onset inammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1428–36.
18. Stepaniuk P, Bernstein CN, Targownik LE, Singh H.Characterization of inammatory bowel
disease in elderly patients: a review of epidemiology, current practices and outcomes of current management strategies. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;29:327–33.
19. Ansaloni L, Andersson RE, Bazzoli F, Catena F, Cennamo V, Di Saverio S, Fuccio L, Jeekel H,
Leppäniemi A, Moore E, Pinna AD, Pisano M, Repici A, Sugarbaker PH, Tuech J-J.Guidelines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society. World J Emerg Surg. 2010;5:29.
20. Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical
trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2012;99:469–76.
21. Valsdottir E, Marks JH. Volvulus: small bowel and colon. Clin Colon Rectal Surg.
2008;21:91–3.
22. Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Grifths EA, Abu-Zidan FM, Di Saverio S,
Ulrych J, Kluger Y, Ben-Ishay O, Moore FA, Ivatury RR, Coimbra R, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Chiara O, Kashuk J, Sakakushev B, Weber DG, Lati R, Bif W, Bala M, Karamarkovic A, Inaba K, Ordonez CA, Hecker A, Augustin G, Demetrashvili Z, Melo RB, Marwah S, Zachariah SK, Shelat VG, McFarlane M, Rems M, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Pereira GA Jr, Negoi I, Cui Y, Sato N, Vereczkei A, Bellanova G, Birindelli A, Di Carlo I, Kok KY, Gachabayov M, Gkiokas G, Bouliaris K, Çolak E, Isik A, Rios-Cruz D, Soto R, Moore EE.WSES guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emer­gency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:37.
23. Falcón BS, López MB, Muñoz BM, Sánchez AÁ, Rey E.Fecal impaction: a systematic review
of its medical complications. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:4.
24. Bates AT, Divino C.Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly: a review of the literature. Aging Dis.
2015;6:149–55.
25. Gardner CS, Jaffe TA, Nelson RC.Impact of CT in elderly patients presenting to the emer-
gency department with acute abdominal pain. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2877–82.