Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 881 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
9 Мб
Скачать
402
E. Rausa et al.
28.3 Neurotrauma
Physiology in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is determined by two phases. The rst phase consists in a cellular disruption or death leading to a neurological impairment. The second phase results in microenviromental changes, edema, and inammation. In EPs, these phases are exacerbated by the age-related physiological changes because aging decreases the brain’s plasticity and its ability to repair the damage. Additionally, TBI conduces to further cellular loss and may boost any disease pro­gression [28].
Medical treatment should evaluate several factors in EPs. Considering the high rate of EPs with hypertension, maintaining an appropriate blood pressure and, consequently, a correct cerebral oxygenation may be challenging [29]. In EPs, the heart ejection should be precisely calculated to determine all the further uid management. Currently, the mainstays in TBI treatment are as follows: (1) balance hypoxia and hypotension; (2) carefully avoid hypoperfusion from hyperventilation; (3) administer anticonvulsants over the rst 7days after the trauma; and (4) do not administer steroids [30].
As the brain volume in EPs is reduced and the dead space between the brain and the head bone is enlarged, the likelihood of a substantial brain swelling with a con­sequent increased intracranial pressure needing surgical intervention is rare. Mannitol remains the most efcient drug in the control of increased intracranial pressure in these patients, even though a decreased function of the astrocytic gap junctions may result in a mannitol hyperfunction worsening the cerebral edema. More recently, several studies have shown that statins reduce the risk of both in­hospital mortality and 12-month adverse outcome [31, 32].
From the surgical perspective, guidelines currently recommend evacuating an acute subdural hematoma when it is >10mm and/or midline shift is >5mm on CT scan, regardless of the patient’s Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) [30]. While this rec­ommendation is well established for young patients, it is vague and controversial with regard to EPs. However, EPs who underwent craniotomy for hematoma evacu­ation showed acceptable outcomes (in-hospital mortality 5–16%) and a similar abil­ity to return to the baseline when compared to younger counterparts. EPs may require more scrupulous care over the period of hospitalization and a longer hospital stay and rehabilitation. Historically, the vast majority of subdural hematoma cases were treated conservatively and resulted in a chronic event. Patients have occasion­ally reported headache and/or minor mental changes; less than 10% have reported substantial neurological symptoms [29].
Recent studies, however, pointed out that chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is not a disease free of long-term complications. Miranda etal. found that the CSDH effect in the long term in EPs leads to a mortality rate of 26.3% at 6months and 32% at 12months [33]; similar results are reported in patients after hip fractures [34]. It might be postulated that CSDH after TBI exacerbates preexisting comorbidities and affects the brain functions, resulting in an increased rate of mortality [33].
Further studies looking at specic TBI cohorts of EPs indicated “male gender” as a predictive factor for a worse outcome. Women reported better outcomes, and it is likely to be due to estrogen and progesterone, which act in the reparation process [35].
28 Trauma inGeriatric Age
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
403
It is well established that falls represent the most common mechanism for TBI.In this context, more efforts should be addressed toward the prevention of such inju­ries. Several studies listed a number of strategies to decrease the probability of these traumatic events happen. Incentivization has been suggested as an encouragement to compliance in elderly to medications, as the careful choice of the more appropri­ate antihypertensive (thiazide-type diuretic therapy reduces hip and pelvic fracture risk compared with other antihypertensive medications), and as the promotion of physical exercise to strengthen their musculoskeletal systems [36, 37].
Of note, the vast majority of EPs are on anticoagulation therapy, which deeply affects outcomes. Anticoagulants make treatment much more demanding and chal­lenging [38]. Howard etal. found a relationship between an increased risk of mor­tality in EPs and those on warfarin who fall [39]. However, this relationship has been debated in the literature, and the data are still contradictory.
Over the last decade, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are available worldwide. NOACs are as efcient as warfarin but relatively safer. The action mechanism con­sists in the direct inhibition of the coagulation cascade. NOACs have a shorter half­life compared to warfarin (8–16h vs 1week, respectively) and are, thus, easier to manage. The major limitation of NOACs is the lack of a specic antidote [40]. The RE-LY trial documented that low doses of NOACs decrease the risk of intracranial hemorrhage as compared with warfarin; conversely, high doses result in a similar risk [41].
28.4 Pelvic Fracture
The pelvis is the strongest bone unit in the body and its fracture is considered to be secondary to high-energy injury (13–18%). However, comorbidities (osteoporosis, arthritis, and osteopenia), preexisting conditions (previous surgery, metastases), and age may weaken the bone pattern and make it prone to fracture even in cases of low­energy trauma [42].
Comparing EPs to their younger counterparts, differences in the mechanism, hospitalization, and outcomes are evident. While younger patients typically sustain such fractures from high-energy traumas, such as motor vehicle collisions, in EPs, low-energy trauma—usually falls from standing—is the most common cause [43]. Therefore, prevention of falls should be taken into consideration when striving to decrease the risk factors. In addition, pelvic fractures are more prevalent among males in younger patients and among females in EPs. The difference in prevalence between sexes is presumably attributable to the hormonal changes in females (estro­gen and progesterone decline) which unleash subsequent osteoporosis [44]. In 64% of pelvis fractures, preexisting osteoporosis is present and this rises to 94% in <60-year-old patients [45].
Mortality in EPs (7.6%) is mostly related to hemorrhage; this is four times higher than in younger patients, where morbidity is due to incomplete healing and/or nerve damage [46]. Pelvic fracture management is standardized in two groups, whether or not the patient is hemodynamically stable [47].
404
Anterior Posterior Compression
23
E. Rausa et al.
Due to the anatomy, pelvic trauma may involve different organs and systems (bones, genitourinary viscera, rectum, small intestine, major vessels, and pudendal nerves); thus, the management of such trauma may be demanding and require a polyspecialistic treatment. Moreover, in EPs, bones are weaker and ligaments and the skin are less exible; thus, the incidence of more complex fractures such as Morel-Lavallee, Malgaigne, or open-book fracture increases. Nonetheless, concom­itant drugs, such as anticoagulants, which EPs are often on, may contribute to per­sistent bleeding and increase of the hemodynamic instability risk [48].
Primary classication is based on the fracture stability. Stable fractures are dened as fractures of the pelvic ring, acetabular fractures, and pubic branch. Unstable fractures are characterized by pelvic fractures in more sites (Malgaigne fracture or open-book fracture). The Young and Burgess system is the most accepted worldwide (Fig.28.1) [49]. According to this classication, angiographic emboliza­tion is predominantly required in anterior posterior compression, in vertical shear, or in combined fracture patterns (Fig.28.1) [50].
1
Lateral Compression
1
Ver tical Shear
Fig. 28.1 Young and Burgess pelvic fracture classication
2
3
28 Trauma inGeriatric Age
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
405
According to ATLS, the rst assessment is based on clinical ndings and pain site. Physical examination is essential to determine the anatomical site entailed in the trauma, which requires further investigations. Bimanual compression of the iliac wings can rule out either vertical or rotational instability [51]. Pelvic X-ray repre­sents the rst radiological investigation. Inlet, outlet, or judet views may offer addi­tional data. CT scan may be useful in suspected active bleeding in order to dene the site of a subsequent angiographic embolization if necessary [52]. When underlying osteoporosis is suspected, an extensive investigation, including of levels of calcium, thyroid function, and sexual hormones in the serum, should be carried out [48].
As previously mentioned, management is primarily based on the clinical presen­tation. In EPs who have a poor physiological reserve to get through a trauma, a comprehensive assessment of the patient should be carried out. Comorbidities should be taken into consideration, especially for potential medication interactions. It is likely that home therapy might interact with drugs administered over the course of hospitalization, causing confusion and obnubilation. A prompt correction of coagulopathy in patients on anticoagulants is essential (Table28.1), while desmo­pressin may help to treat patients with chronic kidney disease [53].
The clinical examination and the radiological investigations looking at poten­tial bleeding dene the diagnostic phase. Once the site of bleeding is identied, and even supposing there is active bleeding but the patient is hemodynamically stable, conservative treatment (bed rest, minimally invasive interventions, and pain control) is preferred. Occasionally, the sites of hemorrhage are multiple, and in one third of pelvic fractures, sources of bleeding are outside of the pelvic borders [54].
Table 28.1 Commonly antiplatelet/anticoagulants agents
Antiplatelet/ anticoagulant agents (brand name) Warfarin (Coumadin) 20–60h 2–5days Vitamin K
Aspirin 20min Life of the
Clopidogrel (Plavix) 6–7h 7–10days Antiplatelet: ADP Prasugrel (Efent) 6–7h Ticlopidine (Ticlid) 12h
Abciximab (ReoPro) 10–30min 48h Antiplatelet: Eptibatide (Integrilin) 2.5h 96h Tiroban (Aggrastat) 2h 48h Fondaparinux (Arixtra) 17–21h 2–4days Bind antithrombin Protamine sulfate Enoxaparin (Lovenox) 4.5–7h 12h
Dabigatran (Pradaxa) 12–17h 2–4days Direct thrombin (II)
Half-life
Duration of action
platelet (7–10days)
Mechanism of action
antagonist (inhibits factors II, VII, IX, and X)
Antiplatelet: thromboxane inhibitor
receptor/P2Y12 inhibitors
glycoprotein IIb/ IIIa inhibitors
inhibitor
Reversal agents Fresh frozen plasma, vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate
Desmopressin; platelets may give temporary reversal Desmopressin; platelets may give temporary reversal
Desmopressin; platelets may give temporary reversal
(more effective with heparin) Unknown
406
E. Rausa et al.
Usually, any small amount of bleeding in hemodynamically stable patients is con­trolled by putting in place a pelvic binder, which stabilizes the fracture. Although arterial bleeding is unusual, its presence should be investigated with radiological investigations when suspected. Such bleeding is unlikely to be controlled with immobilization, and more invasive treatment (i.e., angioembolization and/or surgery) is required [55].
A mobilization as early as possible is recommended to prevent the bone resorp­tion and to decrease the risk of pulmonary infection and vascular or gastrointestinal complications. The average hospital stay for EPs who sustain a pelvic fracture is around 21days. Subsequently, a long rehabilitation is frequently required; however, a complete return to the motility at the baseline is rare, and EPs may need a cane to resume daily activities [56].
28.5 Penetrating Trauma
Trauma is the fth leading cause of death in EPs. Blunt trauma (falls, motor vehicle injuries, or pedestrian collision) is the most common, but outcomes are favorable [57]. The same cannot be said for penetrating trauma, which is relatively rare but with an extremely poor prognosis. This poor prognosis is due to the scarce physio­logical reserve in association with several comorbidities; of note is preexisting car­diovascular disease, which requires the administration of anticoagulants.
Penetrating trauma is most commonly due to a suicide attempt. Social context (urban setting) and comorbidities (depression and chronic pain) may deeply affect EP quality of life. Self-inicted injury rates increase with aging (46.2% between 65 and 74years of age and 51.5% over 75years of age). This type of injury represents a clear public issue [58].
In 80% of suicide attempts, rearms are predominantly employed, and the head is the site most commonly involved (54.2%), with an extremely high mortality (over 90%). Additional anatomical sites of penetrating trauma are the thorax (13.5%) and abdomen (8.2%). In assaulted patients, the thorax and abdomen are the most com­monly involved area (43%), followed by the extremities (16.9%). Higher mortality is recorded in suicide attempts (60%) as compared to assault-related patients (25%) or unintentional penetrating injuries (9%) [58].
Given the complex history and home therapy often present in EPs, these patients should be closely assessed and monitored. It has been demonstrated that the classic hemodynamic criteria (systolic BP <90mmHg or heart rate >120/min), which are typically applied in trauma team activation, are inadequate in EPs. Heffernan etal. compared the blood pressure and the heart rate in geriatric and younger patients and found that vital signs are unreliable in geriatric patients. In fact, this study showed that mortality in geriatric patients increases when the blood pressure and the heart rate are <110mmHg and >130beats/min, respectively. Conversely, in their younger counterparts, vital sign limits are <95mmHg and >90beats/min, respectively [22].
This difference is presumably attributable to a substantial physiological change in EPs causing a poor reserve, in addition to medications (such as beta-blockers, anticoagulants, and diuretics) which may affect the vital signs and lead to a mislead­ing trauma classication. In these patients, a sudden deterioration has always to be
28 Trauma inGeriatric Age
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
407
expected, even though hemodynamically stable on presentation; thus, prompt and aggressive treatment should be preferred [59].
Demetriades etal. found that assigning a specic activation code for severely injured patients over 70years of age reduced the risk of misleading trauma classi­cation and is helpful in enabling the prompt treatment of the patient. Applying these criteria, this study reported a consistent reduction in mortality (p=0.003) [11].
A recent study reported better outcomes for severely injured patients transported to trauma hospital rather than a non-trauma center [60]. As soon as the patient is admitted, a detailed history should be gathered and any home therapy scrupulously evaluated. As bleeding in EPs may be a challenge to control, the anticoagulants need to be promptly interrupted and the coagulopathy corrected if the ISS is high [59]. Multiple hemoglobin tests may help in assessing EPs whose vital signs are affected by anticoagulants and beta-blockers. In these patients, vital signs “wrongly” considered stable may conceal potentially life-threating bleeding. ATLS guidelines should be adopted. Radiological investigations need to be completed while monitor­ing vital signs continuously, and angioembolization or aggressive interventions should be considered in the rst phase of the evaluation [61].
Fluid administration needs to be managed carefully because the physiological response between hypovolemia and edema in EPs is extremely thin. However, a regulated hydration and bicarbonate administration reduce nephropathy. In trauma patients, thermoregulatory response may be dysregulated, causing hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy. Therefore, hypothermia prevention through the admin­istration of warm uids represents a mainstay in the management of trauma [62].
Surgical management is related to the injured area and whether or not vital signs are stable. If vital signs are stable, further investigations (such as CT scan, endos­copy, and bronchoscopy) should be considered and a conservative treatment evalu­ated. Patients with penetrating trauma to the neck need an emergency operation if the vascular or aerodigestive system is involved and vital signs are unstable. Historically, less than 15–20% of penetrating neck injuries need surgery [63, 64].
In cases of chest trauma with hemodynamic instability, the surgical approach pre­ferred is an emergency thoracotomy or median sternotomy, depending on the site involved. In cases of penetrating trauma to the lower part of the left thorax, a diagnostic laparoscopy might be considered to evaluate the diaphragm. The vast majority of cases of penetrating trauma to the chest (nearly 80%) may be managed with a chest drain [
65].
Penetrating trauma to the abdomen which results in peritonitis or in hemody­namic instability requires an emergency laparotomy [66]. An emergency laparos­copy should be taken into consideration in left thoracoabdominal trauma in order to rule out lacerations to the diaphragm [61].
References
1. Adams SD, Cotton BA, McGuire MF, Dipasupil E, Podbielski JM, Zaharia A, et al. Unique
pattern of complications in elderly trauma patients at a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(1):112–8.
2. Projections of future growth of the older. population. 2016. Available at: http://www.aoa.gov/
aoaroot/aging_statistics/future_growth/future_growth.aspx#age. Accessed 24 Feb 2017.
408
3. Wier LM, Levit K, Stranges E, etal. HCUP facts and gures: statistics on hospital-based care
in the United States, 2012. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports.jsp.
4. NHTSA Trafc Safety Facts. 2014. Older population. Available at: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.
gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812273.
5. Carpenter CR, Shelton E, Fowler S, Suffoletto B, Platts-Mills TF, Rothman RE, etal. Risk
factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(1):1–21.
6. Bergeron E, Lavoie A, Clas D, Moore L, Ratte S, Tetreault S, etal. Elderly trauma patients
with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia. J Trauma. 2003;54(3):478–85.
7. Ogilvie R, Curtis K, Lam M, McCloughen A, Foster K.The burden of youth: major traumatic
injury in adolescents and young adults managed in the Australian Capital Territory. J Trauma Nurs. 2014;21(5):218–27.
8. Vieira ER, Palmer RC, Chaves PH.Prevention of falls in older people living in the community.
BMJ. 2016;353:i1419.
9. Brown CV, Rix K, Klein AL, Ford B, Teixeira PG, Aydelotte J, etal. A comprehensive inves-
tigation of comorbidities, mechanisms, injury patterns, and outcomes in geriatric blunt trauma patients. Am Surg. 2016;82(11):1055–62.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and
Control. WISQARS fatal injuries: mortality reports. Available at: https://webappa.cdc.gov/
sasweb/ncipc/mortrate.html.
11. Demetriades D, Sava J, Alo K, Newton E, Velmahos GC, Murray JA, etal. Old age as a crite-
rion for trauma team activation. J Trauma. 2001;51(4):754–6. discussion 6-7.
12. Martin JT, Alkhoury F, O’Connor JA, Kyriakides TC, Bonadies JA. ‘Normal’ vital signs belie
occult hypoperfusion in geriatric trauma patients. Am Surg. 2010;76(1):65–9.
13. Tornetta P, Mostafavi H, Riina J, Turen C, Reimer B, Levine R, etal. Morbidity and mortality
in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999;46(4):702–6.
14. Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P, Aziz H, Fain MJ, Friese RS, etal. Predictors of mortality
in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):894–901.
15. Maxwell CA, Mion LC, Mukherjee K, Dietrich MS, Minnick A, May A, etal. Preinjury physi-
cal frailty and cognitive impairment among geriatric trauma patients determine postinjury functional recovery and survival. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(2):195–203.
16. Labib N, Nouh T, Winocour S, Deckelbaum D, Banici L, Fata P, etal. Severely injured geriat-
ric population: morbidity, mortality, and risk factors. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1908–14.
17. Pracht EE, Langland-Orban B, Flint L.Survival advantage for elderly trauma patients treated
in a designated trauma center. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):69–77.
18. Fleischman RJ, Adams AL, Hedges JR, Ma OJ, Mullins RJ, Newgard CD.The optimum fol-
low- up period for assessing mortality outcomes in injured older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(10):1843–9.
19. Davidson GH, Hamlat CA, Rivara FP, Koepsell TD, Jurkovich GJ, Arbabi S.Long-term sur-
vival of adult trauma patients. JAMA. 2011;305(10):1001–7.
20. Sammy I, Lecky F, Sutton A, Leaviss J, O’Cathain A.Factors affecting mortality in older
trauma patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2016;47(6):1170–83.
21. Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ.Right ventricular function in cardiovascular
disease, part I: anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation. 2008;117(11):1436–48.
22. Heffernan DS, Thakkar RK, Monaghan SF, Ravindran R, Adams CA Jr, Kozloff MS, etal.
Normal presenting vital signs are unreliable in geriatric blunt trauma victims. J Trauma. 2010;69(4):813–20.
23. Greenwald SE.Ageing of the conduit arteries. J Pathol. 2007;211(2):157–72.
24. Bonomo L, Larici AR, Maggi F, Schiavon F, Berletti R. Aging and the respiratory system.
Radiol Clin N Am. 2008;46(4):685–702, v–vi.
E. Rausa et al.
28 Trauma inGeriatric Age
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
409
25. Candela-Toha AM, Recio-Vazquez M, Delgado-Montero A, del Rey JM, Muriel A, Liano F,
etal. The calculation of baseline serum creatinine overestimates the diagnosis of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Nefrologia. 2012;32(1):53–8.
26. Lach HW, Lorenz RA, L’Ecuyer KM.Aging muscles and joints: mobilization. Crit Care Nurs
Clin North Am. 2014;26(1):105–13.
27. Vaughan MS, Vaughan RW, Cork RC. Postoperative hypothermia in adults: relationship of
age, anesthesia, and shivering to rewarming. Anesth Analg. 1981;60(10):746–51.
28. Powers R.Neurobiology of aging. In: Cummings J, Coffey CE, editors. Textbook of geriatric
neuropsychiatry. Washington: American Psychiatric Press; 2000. p.33–79.
29. McIntyre A, Mehta S, Aubut J, Dijkers M, Teasell RW.Mortality among older adults after a
traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):31–40.
30. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, etal.
Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. I.Blood pressure and oxy­genation. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S7–13.
31. Schneider EB, Efron DT, MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ.Premorbid
statin use is associated with improved survival and functional outcomes in older head-injured individuals. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):815–9.
32. Wible EF, Laskowitz DT.Statins in traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7(1):62–73.
33. Miranda LB, Braxton E, Hobbs J, Quigley MR.Chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly: not
a benign disease. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):72–6.
34. Shoda N, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsuda S, Ohe K, Kadono Y, etal. Risk factors affect-
ing inhospital mortality after hip fracture: retrospective analysis using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3):e000416.
35. Gibson CL, Gray LJ, Bath PM, Murphy SP. Progesterone for the treatment of experimental
brain injury; a systematic review. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 2):318–28.
36. Kendrick D, Kumar A, Carpenter H, Zijlstra GA, Skelton DA, Cook JR, etal. Exercise for
reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;28(11):Cd009848.
37. Puttnam R, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, Cushman WC, Louis GT, etal. Association
of 3 different antihypertensive medications with hip and pelvic fracture risk in older adults: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):67–76.
38. De Bonis P, Trevisi G, de Waure C, Sferrazza A, Volpe M, Pompucci A, etal. Antiplatelet/anti-
coagulant agents and chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68732.
39. Howard JL, Cipolle MD, Horvat SA, Sabella VM, Reed JF, Fulda G, etal. Preinjury warfarin
worsens outcome in elderly patients who fall from standing. J Trauma. 2009;66(6):1518–22. discussion 23-4.
40. Kundu A, Sardar P, Chatterjee S, Aronow WS, Owan T, Ryan JJ.Minimizing the risk of bleed-
ing with NOACs in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(7):491–500.
41. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz M, Healey JS, Oldgren J, etal. Risk of
bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial brillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2363–72.
42. Lorich D, Gardener M, Helfet D.Trauma to the pelvis and extremities. In: Norton J, Barie P,
Bollinger R, Chang A, Lowry S, Mulvihill S, etal., editors. Surgery basic science and clinical evidence. NewYork: Springer; 2008. p.505–20.
43. Stahel PF, Hammerberg EM.History of pelvic fracture management: a review. World J Emerg
Surg. 2016;11:18.
44. Morris RO, Sonibare A, Green DJ, Masud T.Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes
in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(900):646–50.
45. Krappinger D, Kammerlander C, Hak DJ, Blauth M. Low-energy osteoporotic pelvic frac-
tures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(9):1167–75.
46. Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Evans JA, etal. The epidemiology
of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1066–73. discussion 72-3.
410
47. Dechert TA, Duane TM, Frykberg BP, Aboutanos MB, Malhotra AK, Ivatury RR. Elderly
patients with pelvic fracture: interventions and outcomes. Am Surg. 2009;75(4):291–5.
48. Bazylewicz D, Konda S.A Review of the denitive treatment of pelvic fractures. Bull Hosp Jt
Dis. 2016;74(1):6–11.
49. McCormack R, Strauss EJ, Alwattar BJ, Tejwani NC.Diagnosis and management of pelvic
fractures. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2010;68(4):281–91.
50. Rommens PM, Ossendorf C, Pairon P, Dietz SO, Wagner D, Hofmann A.Clinical pathways for
fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: personal experience and review of the literature. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(1):1–11.
51. Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Bif W, Horer TM, Catena F, etal. Pelvic trauma: WSES
classication and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:5.
52. Schicho A, Schmidt SA, Seeber K, Olivier A, Richter PH, Gebhard F.Pelvic X-ray misses out
on detecting sacral fractures in the elderly– Importance of CT imaging in blunt pelvic trauma. Injury. 2016;47(3):707–10.
53. Kaufmann JE, Vischer UM. Cellular mechanisms of the hemostatic effects of desmopressin
(DDAVP). J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(4):682–9.
54. White CE, Hsu JR, Holcomb JB. Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury.
2009;40(10):1023–30.
55. Wagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D, Hofmann A, Rommens PM. Fragility fractures of
the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(4):349–62.
56. Ojodu I, Pohlemann T, Hopp S, Rollmann MF, Holstein JH, Herath SC.Predictors of mortality
for complex fractures of the pelvic ring in the elderly: a twelve-year review from a German level I trauma center. Injury. 2015;46(10):1996–8.
57. Nagy KK, Smith RF, Roberts RR, Joseph KT, An GC, Bokhari F, etal. Prognosis of penetrat-
ing trauma in elderly patients: a comparison with younger patients. J Trauma. 2000;49(2):190–
3. discussion 3-4.
58. Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Schnuriger B, Barmparas G, Eberle BM, Lam L, etal. Gunshot inju-
ries in the elderly: patterns and outcomes. A national trauma databank analysis. World J Surg. 2011;35(3):528–34.
59. Talving P, Beneld R, Hadjizacharia P, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D.Coagulopathy in
severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. J Trauma. 2009;66(1):55–61. discussion -2.
60. Sugerman DE, Xu L, Pearson WS, Faul M.Patients with severe traumatic brain injury trans-
ferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1491–9.
61. Bif WL, Leppaniemi A.Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma. World J
Surg. 2015;39(6):1373–80.
62. Brown CV, Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Chan L, Demetriades D. Is noninvasive hemodynamic
monitoring appropriate for the elderly critically injured patient? J Trauma. 2005;58(1):102–7.
63. Montorfano MA, Pla F, Vera L, Cardillo O, Nigra SG, Montorfano LM.Point-of-care ultra-
sound and Doppler ultrasound evaluation of vascular injuries in penetrating and blunt trauma. Crit Ultrasound J. 2017;9(1):5.
64. Colip CG, Gorantla V, LeBedis CA, Soto JA, Anderson SW. Extremity CTA for pen-
etrating trauma: 10-year experience using a 64-detector row CT scanner. Emerg Radiol. 2016;24(3):223–32.
65. Kuhajda I, Zarogoulidis K, Kougioumtzi I, Huang H, Li Q, Dryllis G, etal. Penetrating trauma.
J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 4):S461–5.
66. Hajibandeh S, Gumber AO, Wong CS. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the manage-
ment of penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;34:127–36.
E. Rausa et al.
Bowel Obstructions
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
29
GennaroPerrone, LucaAnsaloni, FedericoCoccolini, SalomoneDi Saverio, MassimoSartelli, andFaustoCatena
In elderly patients, bowel obstruction (BO) accounts for 10–12% of the PS access for abdominal pain and are intestinal obstructions [1]. Obstruction is three times more common in older adults than in younger patients [2]. After biliary disease, BO is the second most common reason for emergency surgical interventions in this group [3].
The ileum is the most common site of obstruction (most mobile tube, smoother, thinner, therefore more exposed to adhesions and hernias compared to the large bowel). The three most common causes of all small bowel occlusions (SBO) are adhesions (50–75%), hernias (15%), and neoplasms (15%). Gallstone ileum is a rare disease that accounts for 1–4% of mechanical obstructions.
Intra-abdominal adhesions following abdominal surgery represent a major unsolved problem. They are the rst cause of SBO (Fig.29.1). Diagnosis is based on clinical evaluation, water-soluble contrast follow-through, and computed tomogra­phy scan. Adhesive SBO requires appropriate management with a proper diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. Indication and length of nonoperative management (NOM) and appropriate timing for surgery may represent an insidious issue. Single therapeu­tic strategies are typically unsuccessful in preventing peritoneal adhesions due to the
G. Perrone • F. Catena (*) Department of Emergency Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
L. Ansaloni • F. Coccolini General Surgery Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
S. Di Saverio Department of Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
M. Sartelli Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 A. Crucitti (ed.), Surgical Management of Elderly Patients,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60861-7_29
411